|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 94 No. 12 (December 15), 1999:
pp. 4263-4273
Vaccines With Interleukin-12-Transduced Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells
Elicit Very Potent Therapeutic and Long-Lasting Protective Immunity
By
Kyriaki Dunussi-Joannopoulos,
Kathlene Runyon,
Jamie Erickson,
Robert G. Schaub,
Robert G. Hawley, and
John P. Leonard
From the Department of Preclinical Research and Development, Genetics
Institute, Andover, MA; and the Hematopoiesis Department, Holland
Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a heterodimeric cytokine mediating a
dynamic interplay between T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs).
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that recombinant murine IL-12
(rmIL-12) promotes specific antitumor immunity mediated by T cells in
several types of tumors. However, the in vivo antitumor properties of
IL-12 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not been previously
reported. We show here in a murine AML model that systemic administration of rmIL-12 significantly delays tumor growth but is
incapable of rescuing mice from lethal leukemia. In contrast, AML cells
genetically modified to express IL-12 (IL12-AML) using murine stem cell
virus (MSCV) p40 + p35 elicit very potent antileukemic activity.
Vaccines with lethally irradiated IL12-AML cells protect naive mice
against challenge with wild-type AML cells and, more importantly, can cure mice bearing a considerable leukemic burden. Immunized mice show no signs of systemic IL-12 toxicity and their spleen histology is comparable with naive mice spleen. In vivo depletion of IL-12, interferon- (IFN- ), or CD8+ T
cells after injections with live IL12-AML cells abrogates completely the antileukemia immune responses. Studies on the in vitro effects of
IFN- on AML cells demonstrate enhanced expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and accessory molecules
and induction of the costimulatory molecules B7.1 and B7.2, but no
significant direct antiproliferative effect. 51Cr release
assays show that rejection of live IL12-AML cells supports the
development of long-lasting leukemia-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte
(CTL) activity. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that IL12-AML vaccination is a safe and potent immunotherapeutic approach that has a great potential to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with AML.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DESPITE THE BROAD USE of the term
vaccines in tumor immunology, current cell-based cancer vaccines are
always therapeutic, aiming to activate host immune responses against
tumor antigens to which the immune system has already been
exposed.1-3 Under these conditions, for tumor cell vaccines
to confer a favorable clinical outcome, they must circumvent host
immune mechanisms conferring the nonresponsiveness (T-cell tolerance)
to cancer.4,5 Recent molecular immunology studies focused
on pathways of T-cell activation have deciphered several critical steps
that can lead to cancer tolerance. It has been clearly demonstrated
that effective antigen recognition by T cells can only occur when the
surrounding tissues carry danger signals as a result of local
inflammation and tissue damage. The most important carriers of these
signals, the host antigen-presenting cells (APCs), provide T cells with membrane-bound and soluble molecules, which are absolutely necessary for their costimulation and consequent expansion upon encountering new
antigens.6,7 The expression of T-cell costimulatory
molecules on APCs and the type of T-cell activation and differentiation largely depends on the cytokine environment at the time of antigen recognition.8-10
The hypothesis that lack of appropriate costimulatory and
cytokine-mediated signals are major causes enabling most tumor types to
induce T-cell tolerance has been confirmed during recent years in
numerous studies on gene therapy tumor models (reviewed in Chen et
al,11 Dranoff and Mulligan,12 and
Pardoll13). In these studies, tumor cells are genetically
engineered to express genes encoding various cytokine and costimulatory
molecules or the combination of both. In this context, the members of
the B7 family costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7.1) and CD86 (B7.2) have shown efficacy at inducing protective and therapeutic immunity against
a number of murine tumors.14-16 Among the different
cytokine genes that have been used to enhance tumor immunogenicity,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and
interleukin-12 (IL-12) appear to be the most potent
molecules.17-20 It has been recently reported that the
expression of both B7.1 and IL-12 molecules at the tumor site enhances
the antitumor efficacy achieved with either molecule
alone.21,22 A critical issue that has emerged from these
studies is that the sustained local release of low amounts of cytokines
leads to the development of dramatic local tissue changes, mostly
having the character of local inflammation, without causing any adverse
systemic effects.
IL-12, a heterodimeric disulfide-linked glycoprotein consisting of a
35- and a 40-kD subunit, has a relatively short history. It was
originally identified in 1989 as natural killer (NK) cell stimulatory
factor (NKCS),23 and it was soon demonstrated that it
mediates a number of important biological properties, including stimulation of cytotoxicity and proliferation of NK cells and cytotoxic
T lymphocytes (CTL), induction of cytokine and chemokine secretion,
especially interferon- (IFN- ), and generation of T helper type 1 (Th1) cells.24,25 The primary physiologic sources of IL-12
appear to be APCs, such as macrophages and dendritic cells.26 During the last 4 to 5 years, IL-12 has been
demonstrated to be one of the most potent antitumor cytokines. Systemic
administration of recombinant murine IL-12 (rmIL-12) in several tumor
models mediates profound T-cell-mediated antitumor effects in vivo,
leading to regression of established tumor masses, which is frequently associated with the generation of antitumor immunological
memory.27-30 However, by the same token, prolonged systemic
administration of rIL-12 has been related with systemic
toxicity.31,32 To address this problem, several studies on
experimental tumors have evaluated the therapeutic potential of
IL-12-based tumor cell vaccines and, with few exceptions, the vaccines
were found to cure or significantly improve the survival of mice
bearing a variety of tumors.19,33 The antitumor activity of
systemic or local release of IL-12 is largely mediated by IFN-
secreted at the tumor site by stimulated NK and T
cells,28,34 along with upregulation of major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression on tumor cells,35 NOS induction,36,37 release of other
cytokines,38 and inhibition of angiogenesis through the
induction of the chemokine IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) by both
tumor cells and infiltrating T cells.39-41
Vitale et al42 and Stine et al43 have recently
demonstrated that IL-12 alone or in combination with low-dose IL-2
promotes the lysis of AML blasts in vitro. However, the in vivo
activity of IL-12 in AML has not been previously reported. The
compelling need to evaluate new therapeutic modalities in AML stems
from the fact that AML remains one of the least responsive tumors to therapy. Despite the fact that effective induction chemotherapy regimens induce remission in 60% to 80% of the patients, long-term survival is only achieved in a minority of patients.44,45
At present, it appears highly unrealistic that even the most promising immunomodulatory approaches will replace remission-induction
chemotherapy protocols in AML. However, it is reasonable to argue that
potent preclinical immunotherapy strategies should be tested as
adjuvant therapy in AML patients in remission, most of whom are
harboring minimal residual disease (MRD).
Recently, we and others have shown in preclinical studies that vaccines
with gene-modified AML cells represent a potent immunotherapeutic approach.46-49 We have demonstrated in an SJL primary
leukemia model that vaccines with AML cells expressing costimulatory
molecules (B7.1) or cytokines (GM-CSF) cure leukemic mice and protect
naive mice against subsequent challenge with wild-type
(wt) AML cells.47 The efficacy of the AML
cell-based vaccines provides convincing evidence that leukemia-specific
antigens exist on AML cells and, more importantly, emphasize that the
AML antigens recognized by the immune system do not cross-react with
epitopes on normal hematopoietic progenitors. In this report, we extend
our studies to evaluate the efficacy of the cytokine IL-12 in the SJL
AML model. Our results demonstrate that, within the same model,
systemic and local release of IL-12 confer distinct clinical effects.
Although systemic administration of rmIL-12 leads to significantly
delayed leukemia growth and prolonged survival, ultimately it cannot
prevent the progression from residual to lethal leukemia. In contrast,
vaccines with AML cells expressing IL-12 elicit very potent
antileukemia immunity, leading to the curing of leukemic
mice
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mice.
Female SJL/J mice (H-2s), which were 6 to 8 weeks old, were
purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). The animals were
kept at the animal facility of Genetics Institute according to the
institute's guidelines.
Murine AML model.
The murine AML model used in this study has been previously
described.46 Briefly, radiation-induced AML cells are
maintained by growth in syngeneic SJL/J female mice. Mice injected
intravenously (IV) or intraperitoneally (IP) with 104 AML
cells develop systemic lethal leukemia in 4 to 5 weeks. In all
experiments, freshly isolated or frozen spleen mononuclear cells from
leukemic mice (killed just before succumbing to leukemia) were used.
Flow cytometry shows that essentially 100% of these cells express the
myeloid-specific antigen Gr-1.
rmIL-12 administration.
Mice were injected IV (tail vein) with live 105 AML cells
and subsequently received subcutaneous (SC) injections of rmIL-12 (Genetics Institute, Andover, MA) at various doses and schedules. Mice
were observed for signs of toxicity and monitored daily for survival.
Retroviral constructs and murine IL-12 transduction of AML cells.
The retroviral vector encoding murine IL-12 and producer clones have
been previously described.50 Briefly, the vector uses the
LTR of the murine stem cell virus (MSCV) and contains the puromycin
N-acetyltransferase (pac) gene under the control of an
internal phosphoglycerate kinase (pgk) gene promoter. An
encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES)
permits the translation of the p35 gene from the same
LTR-directed RNA transcript as the p40 gene. The retroviral
construct was transfected into helper- free ecotropic packaging
GP+E-86 cells and producer clones (GP+E-86/MSCVmIL-12) secreting high titer of virus were used for AML cell infection. Producer cells secreting empty virus (GP+E-86/MSCVpac) were used for infection of control cells. Cells were main- tained at
37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
fetal calf serum, 2% glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and
1 µg/mL puromycin. Infection of AML cells with recombinant
viruses has been previously described.46 Briefly,
frozen spleen AML cells (5 to 7 × 105/mL) were
exposed twice to viral supernatant for 4 to 6 hours in the presence of
8 µg/mL polybrene and 15% WEHI-3B-conditioned media.
Designated numbers of infected, unselected cells were used for in
vivo injections.
Recombinant murine IL-12 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Levels of rmIL-12 secreted by irradiated and nonirradiated IL12-AML
cells, cultured for 24 hours at 106 cells/mL, were
determined using the InterTest-12X mouse rmIL-12p70 ELISA kit (Genzyme,
Cambridge, MA). The kit is a solid-phase ELISA using the multiple
antibody sandwich principle and is used for the quantitation of mouse
rmIL-12p70 heterodimer levels. The sensitivity of the assay is 5 pg/mL.
In vivo immunization studies.
For the in vivo immunization studies, groups of leukemic or naive SJL/J
mice (8 to 10/group) were injected IV (tail vein) with live or
irradiated (7,335 cGy from a 137Cs source discharging 815 cGy/min) IL12-AML or control pac-AML cells. In most of the experiments,
105 cells were used and were diluted in 200 to 300 µL of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
In vivo depletion studies.
The following antibodies were used for in vivo depletion studies:
C17.15, rat antimouse IL-12 monoclonal antibody (MoAb; Genetics Institute); XGM1.2, rat antimouse IFN- MoAb; and GK1.5 and 53-6.7, rat antimouse CD4 and CD8 MoAb, respectively (PharMingen, San Diego,
CA). Control mice received the same amount of rat IgG as an isotype control.
Proliferation assays.
AML cells were cultured at 4 × 105 cells/well in
U-bottomed 96-well plates in the presence of rmIL-12 (10 ng/mL) or
rmIFN- (100 U/mL; PharMingen). Proliferation of responder cells was
measured after 48 hours by the incorporation of 3H
thymidine (1 µCi/well) for the last 20 hours of incubation.
Immunostaining and flow cytometry analysis.
AML cells were cultured at 2 × 106 cells/mL in the
presence of rmIL-12 (10 ng/mL) or rmIFN- (100 U/mL). After 48 hours
in culture, cells were harvested and stained as previously
described.46 The following MoAbs (PharMingen) were used for
flow cytometry studies: Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), CD18 (C71/16), CD11a (2D7),
CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (HL3), CD40 (HM40-3), CD48 (HM48-1), CD54 (3E2),
CD95 (Jo2), CD3e (145-2C11), CD4 (L3T4), CD8a (53-6.7), CD45R/B220
(RA3-6B2), CD80 (1G10), CD86 (GL1), and H-2Ds (KH43). For
MHC class II antigens, an anti-I-Ab MoAb (KH74) was used
(cross-reacts with I-As).
Spleen histology-immunohistochemistry.
Spleens were collected and bisected; one half was cryopreserved in
optimum cutting temperature (OCT; Tissue-Tek; Sakura Finetek, Inc,
Torrance, CA) by liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane method, and the other half was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. For
histological evaluation, 5-µm sections from paraffin-embedded tissues
were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H+E). For
immunohistochemistry, cryopreserved samples were cryosectioned onto
capillary gap microslides and fixed in acetone before storing at
20°C. Immediately before staining, stored cryosections were
fixed in cold acetone for 5 minutes, air-dried, blocked with
avidin/biotin block (Zymed Laboratories, Inc, South Francisco, CA), and
finally washed in PBS. Next, the slides were assembled on an automated
immunostainer (Ventana Tech Mate 500; Ventana Medical
Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and stained with various MoAbs diluted to
final concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 µg/mL. The following MoAbs
were used: Gr-1 (RB6-8C5), CD4 (L3T4), CD8a (53-6.7), and CD45R/B220
(RA3-6B2) (PharMingen). Serial sections stained with the appropriate
isotype Igs were used as negative controls. An indirect
streptavidin-peroxidase method was used with DAB (3, 3'
diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as color chromogen. For the B220
staining, paraffin-embedded samples were stained using AEC
(3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole) as the color chromogen.
51Cr release CTL assays.
Spleens were collected and single-cell suspensions were prepared.
Splenocytes (5 × 106) were cocultured with irradiated
(7,335 cGy) AML cells (1 × 105) in 2 mL complete
RPMI/well of a 24-well tissue culture plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA).
Six days later, splenocytes were harvested and used as effector cells
in CTL assays. Autologous AML cells or control EL-4 tumor cells (2 × 106) were labeled with 200 µCi of
51Cr (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) for 90 minutes,
washed twice, and used as targets (5,000/well) in the CTL assays. The
standard 4-hour CTL assays were set up with various effector to target (E:T) ratios in a total volume of 0.2 mL/well in a 96-well microtiter plate. All conditions were set up in quadruplicate. After 4 hours of
incubation, 75 µL of supernatant was harvested from each well and
mixed with 125 µL of liquid scintillation cocktail (Optiphase Suprmix; Wallac, Turku, Finland), and the quantity of 51Cr
was determined using a microbeta counter. Results are expressed as the
percentage of specific lysis, which was calculated as follows: 100 × (sample cpm spontaneous cpm)/(maximum cpm spontaneous cpm). The cpm of supernatant from wells containing target
cells in normal media and from wells containing target cells in 1%
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) served as the spontaneous and
the maximum release, respectively.
Statistical analysis.
Most individual experiments consisted of 10 mice per treatment group.
The data analyzed represent the results of 1 or 2 individual experiments. The statistical survival analysis was performed using the
standard Mantel-Cox logrank test. Cytokine values secreted by
transduced AML cells and AML cells proliferation results are mean ± SD. The statistical significance between various groups was analyzed
using the Student's t-test.
 |
RESULTS |
Systemic rmIL-12 administration significantly delays leukemia growth.
We first investigated the effect of rmIL-12 administration on the tumor
growth. In this AML model, untreated mice develop lethal leukemia 4 to
5 weeks after AML inoculation. Various doses and schedules of rmIL-12
administration were tested (including continuous low dose of 0.5 µg/d
during the entire period of the experiment), and the best results were
achieved when leukemic mice received 2.5 µg/injection of rmIL-12 SC
on days 0 through 4, 14 through 18, and 28 through 32. During the
course of rmIL-12 administration, mice did not develop any clinical
signs of toxicity. Spleen histology and fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS) analysis 4 weeks after leukemia
inoculation showed that rmIL-12-treated mice had comparable spleen
histology and cell subsets with naive mice (data not shown). However,
although IL-12-treated mice had a statistically significant prolonged
survival compared with control untreated animals (P < .001),
this type of treatment could not prevent the development of lethal
leukemia (Fig 1).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Effect of systemic administration of rmIL-12 on leukemia
growth. SJL mice (8 to 10 mice/group) were injected IV (tail vein) with
live 105 AML cells on day 0. rmIL-12 was administered SC
(2.5 µg/injection) on days 0 through 4, 14 through 18, and 28 through
32 ( ). Control mice ( ) received injections with PBS. A solid
arrow indicates the time of spleen histology and FACScan analysis. This
graph is representative of 4 independent experiments.
|
|
IL-12 gene transduction of AML cells.
The levels of rmIL-12 secreted by IL-12-transduced AML cells
(IL12-AML) were 2.2 ± 3.4 ng/106 cells/mL/24 h and were
comparable to production levels reported in other IL-12 gene transfer
studies. wt AML cells cultured under the same conditions did not
secrete detectable amounts of rmIL-12. Irradiation of IL12-AML cells
did not abrogate rmIL-12 secretion in vitro for at least 4 days (data
not shown). After 3 to 5 days of culture, the in vitro growth
characteristics of IL12-AML cells, including cell morphology and growth
rate, as well as MHC, costimulatory, and adhesion molecule expression,
were similar to those of mock-infected AML cells (data not shown).
IL12-AML cells have reduced tumorigenicity.
Studies on gene therapy tumor models have shown that a dissociation may
exist between the tumorigenicity of live cells and the immunogenicity
of irradiated transduced tumor cells, suggesting that mechanisms
responsible for tumor growth inhibition and immune memory may not be
the same.51,52 In this context, Dranoff et al17
have demonstrated that irradiated, GM-CSF-transduced murine melanoma
cells are potent prophylactic vaccines, whereas live transduced cells
are not rejected. In contrast, we have shown in previous studies that
leukemogenic numbers of live B7.2-expressing, IL-4-expressing, and
tumor necrosis factor- -expressing AML cells are
rejected, whereas irradiated cells do not protect mice against wt AML
challenge.53 To assess directly the effect of the cytokine IL-12 upon the tumorigenicity of the AML cells, live transduced cells
were inoculated into syngeneic SJL mice. Groups of mice were injected
IV with increasing numbers (105 to 2 × 106) of IL12-AML or mock-infected pac-AML cells. All mice
inoculated with IL12-AML cells rejected the leukemic cells, did not
develop any clinical signs of toxicity, and remained alive and
tumor-free for more than 6 months. In contrast, 100% of the mice
injected with pac-AML cells developed leukemia and died after 4 to 5 weeks (Fig 2). These results clearly show
that local secretion of rmIL-12 by IL12-AML cells supports the
generation of effective antileukemic immune responses capable of
eliminating high numbers (ie, 2 × 106) of leukemic
cells.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
IL-12 expression reduces significantly the tumorigenicity
of AML cells. SJL mice (8 to 10 mice/group) were injected IV with
increasing numbers of live IL12-AML cells or control pac-AML cells.
Mice injected with 105 ( ) or 2 × 106 ( )
IL12-AML cells do not develop leukemia. Control mice injected with
105 pac-AML cells ( ) develop lethal leukemia. This graph
is representative of 3 independent experiments.
|
|
Irradiated IL12-AML cells induce prophylactic and therapeutic
immunity.
In clinical trials with tumor cell vaccines, cancer patients are
vaccinated with irradiated, genetically modified tumor cells. Therefore, we evaluated the capacity of irradiated IL12-AML cells to
protect naive mice from live wt AML challenge or to cure mice with
already established leukemia. In this model, vaccinations with
irradiated wt AML cells confer no detectable antileukemia immunity.46 Mice were injected with 105
irradiated (7,335 cGy) IL12-AML or pac-AML cells and 1 week later were
challenged with 105 live wt AML cells. All mice immunized
with irradiated IL12-AML cells developed antileukemia immunity and
survived the AML challenge, whereas the challenge was lethal to all
mice immunized with irradiated pac-AML cells
(Fig 3A).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Vaccines with irradiated 12-AML cells induce systemic
prophylactic and therapeutic immunity. (A) SJL mice (10 mice/ group)
were vaccinated IV with irradiated 105 IL12-AML or control
pac-AML cells and inoculated 1 week later with live 105 wt
AML cells. Mice vaccinated with IL12-AML ( ) cells develop
antileukemia prophylactic immunity and are resistant to AML challenge,
whereas control vaccinated mice ( ) develop lethal leukemia. (B)
Groups of SJL mice were injected IV with live 105 AML
cells. On day 8 ( ), 10 ( ), or 15 ( ) after AML inoculation,
they were vaccinated IV with irradiated 105 IL12-AML cells.
Control leukemic mice ( ) did not receive vaccines. The day-8 vaccine
experiment was performed twice with identical results.
|
|
We next determined if vaccination with irradiated IL12-AML cells could
cure leukemic mice. In these experiments, mice were first injected with
105 live wt AML cells and then vaccinated with irradiated
IL12-AML or control cells. As shown in Fig 3B, the survival of mice
vaccinated on day 8, 10, or 15 after leukemia inoculation was 100%,
90%, and 60%, respectively. Although day 8 and 10 vaccines did not have statistically significant difference in clinical outcome (P > .3), day 15 vaccines showed significantly less efficacy
than earlier (day 8) vaccines (P < .03). These results are
consistent with previous observations that late AML vaccines (2 weeks
after tumor inoculation) are always less efficacious than week 1 vaccines, most likely due to a larger tumor burden.47
Collectively, these data clearly demonstrate that release of rmIL-12 at
the tumor site can promote both the development of protective immunity
and the complete regression of an established leukemic burden (up until
the follow-up monitoring was terminated after 8 months, the mice
remained tumor-free).
Vaccinated leukemic mice have spleen histopathology comparable with
naive mice.
In our studies, mice injected with either live or irradiated IL12-AML
cells never developed any clinical signs of toxicity. To obtain
information on organ histology of vaccinated mice, we compared spleens
from IL12-AML or pac-AML vaccinated mice and naive SJL mice. In this
experiment, mice were injected with live wt AML cells and 1 week later
were immunized with irradiated IL12-AML or control pac-AML cells. The
spleens were removed 31 days after leukemia inoculation, at the time
when the control (pac-AML) vaccinated mice had become moribund. Spleen
histology showed that the naive spleen and the spleen from IL12-AML
vaccinated mouse were comparable, both having appreciable hematopoiesis
present and normal complements of what appeared to be relatively active
lymphoid tissue or white pulp. In contrast, the spleen from the control
vaccinated mouse had virtually complete obliteration of splenic
architecture with a diffuse infiltrate of myeloid leukemic cells (data
not shown). Spleen immunohistochemistry using the lymphoid antigens
CD3, CD4, CD8, and B220 and the myeloid antigen Gr-1 (it is not
expressed on lymphoid and erythroid cells) confirmed comparable normal
architecture and distribution of lymphoid and myeloid cells in the
naive and IL12-AML spleen. In the control vaccinated spleen, very few
cells stained positive for lymphoid markers and the spleen was
diffusely infiltrated by Gr-1-positive cells
(Fig 4). Taken together, spleen histology
demonstrates that the local secretion of rmIL-12 by irradiated tumor
cells, which presumably leads to transient local recruitment of immune
cells and consequent tumor rejection, does not result in any long-term
microscopic alterations from the normal splenic architecture.

View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Vaccinated leukemic mice have spleen features comparable
with naive mice. Spleen immunohistochemistry of (A) control
pac-AML-vaccinated leukemic mouse; (B) IL12-AML-vaccinated leukemic
mouse; and (C) naive SJL mouse. The spleen from pac-AML-vaccinated
mouse is almost completely infiltrated by Gr-1-positive cells and has
very few residual B220 (B cells) and CD4/CD8 (T cells) positive cells.
In contrast, the distribution of myeloid and lymphoid cells in the
IL12-AML spleen is comparable with naive spleen.
|
|
In vivo depletion of IL-12 or IFN- abrogates
antileukemia immune responses.
To evaluate the role of IL-12 in the generation of antileukemia
immunity, mice that were vaccinated with irradiated IL12-AML cells were
treated in vivo with antimouse IL-12 MoAb and were challenged 1 week
later with live wt AML cells. As shown in
Fig 5A, control mice that were treated with
control isotype rat IgG were resistant to the AML challenge, whereas
all mice treated with anti-IL-12 MoAb developed lethal leukemia. In
most tumor models analyzed in the literature, the antitumor effects of
rmIL-12 are at least in part mediated by the secondary secretion of
IFN- .38,54 This is based on the observation that,
although IFN- production alone is not sufficient to induce
significant therapeutic effects,34 the coadministration of
IFN- neutralizing MoAb abrogates the antitumor efficacy of
IL-12.27,28 To determine the importance of endogenous
IFN- production in IL12-AML rejection, SJL mice were injected with
live IL12-AML cells and treated with purified anti-IFN- MoAb.
Control mice received either saline or control isotype IgG. As shown in
Fig 5B, depletion of IFN- completely abrogated the rmIL-12-mediated
antitumor effect and 100% of treated mice developed leukemia.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
Effects of the in vivo depletion of IL-12 or IFN- on
leukemia growth. (A) SJL mice (10 mice/group) were injected IP on days
1, 0, 2, 4, and 6 with 200 µg of either anti-IL-12 MoAb or rat
IgG as an isotype control. On day 0 the mice were immunized IV with
irradiated 105 IL12-AML cells, and on day 7, they
were challenged with live wt 105 AML cells. In vivo
depletion of IL-12 during the immunization with irradiated IL12-AML
cells leads to abrogation of protective immunity, and all of the
mice developed lethal leukemia. Control mice were resistant to AML
challenge. (B) SJL mice were injected IV with live 105
IL12-AML cells on day 0 and then injected IP on days 0, 1, 2, and 7 with purified preparations (320 µg/injection) of hybridoma XGM1.2
( ). Control mice were injected with IL12-AML cells and received
either no therapy ( ) or the same amount of IgG1 as an isotype
control ( ). Mice depleted of IFN- develop lethal leukemia, and
both groups of control mice reject the live IL12-AML cells.
|
|
In vitro effects of rmIL-12 and rmIFN- on AML cells.
The cytokines IL-12 and IFN- may exert their in vivo antitumor
effects by activating the host's immune responses and/or by acting
directly on tumor cells. We therefore examined the immunophenotype, proliferative response, and survival of AML cells cultured in vitro
with either cytokine or the combination of both. After 48 hours, the
AML cells were stained with various MoAbs (described in Materials and
Methods) that are directed against a wide range of cell surface
molecules. We only present here the differences observed when cytokines
were included in the culture. As shown in
Fig 6A, AML cells had increased expression
of costimulatory, MHC class I and II, and adhesion molecules when they
were exposed to rmIFN- , whereas rmIL-12 had very little or no effect
on the phenotype of the AML cells. The AML cell phenotype acquired with both cytokines did not differ from the rmIFN- phenotype (data not
shown). In addition to the surface markers described above, we also
stained the AML cells with Annexin V (detects apoptotic cells), and no
positive cells were detected 48 hours after the initiation of the
cultures (data not shown). Proliferation assays showed that, although
AML cells cultured with IFN- exhibited a statistically significant
difference in proliferative response compared with media alone
(P < .01), it is highly unlikely that this difference is
significant with regard to mechanisms of tumor rejection (Fig 6B).
Lastly, the viability of AML cells after 48 hours in culture, as
assessed by trypan-blue exclusion, showed that there were no
statistical differences in survival between the various AML culture
groups (Fig 6C). These in vitro data suggest that direct killing of
tumor cells by IL-12 or IFN- is unlikely to be an immediate primary
mechanism leading to tumor rejection. In contrast, FACS analysis data
strongly indicate that the heightened expression of molecules known to
be very important or necessary for T-cell activation/costimulation may
be important in orchestrating the complex immune events leading to
antileukemia immunity.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
In vitro effects of IFN- on AML cells. (A) AML cells
were cultured at 2 × 106 cells/mL with either 100 U/mL
rmIFN- or 10 ng/mL rmIL-12. Control AML cells were cultured in RPMI
alone. After 48 hours, cells were harvested and stained as described in
Materials and Methods. In all panels, solid histograms represent the
expression of the indicated markers by AML cells cultured in RPMI
alone. A total of 10,000 cells were analyzed by FACS for each sample.
(B) AML cells were cultured at 4 × 105 cells/well in
U-bottomed 96-well plates in the presence of 100 U/mL rmIFN- or 10 ng/mL rmIL-12. 3H thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added during
the last 20 hours of culture. Results are representative of 2 independent experiments and are shown as the mean ± SD of 8 cultures.
(C) AML cells were cultured as described in (A). After 48 hours, cells
were harvested and their viability was assessed by trypan blue
exclusion. Results are representative of 2 independent experiments and
are shown as the mean ± SD of triplicate culture.
|
|
IL12-AML cell rejection is CD8+ T-cell dependent and
supports the development of long-lasting, leukemia-specific
CTL activity.
The mechanisms responsible for tumor rejection in cytokine gene
immunotherapy may not be the same as those required for immune memory.
Several types of immune cells, such as macrophages, eosinophils, and
neutrophils, that are recruited locally by the secreted cytokine may
participate in tumor killing, but the induction of memory cells is
exclusively CD8+ T-cell dependent.12,51 To
delineate the role of T-cell subsets in the rejection of live IL12-AML
cells, we performed in vivo depletion of CD4+ or
CD8+ T cells. As shown in Fig
7A, all CD8+-depleted vaccinated mice developed leukemia at
the same time as control animals, whereas from the
CD4+-depleted group only 20% developed leukemia, with 80%
of the mice rejecting live IL12-AML cells. These results demonstrate
the absolute requirement for CD8+ T cells in tumor
rejection, whereas the participation of CD4+ T cells was
not necessary in most of the vaccinated mice. In an attempt to address
the issue of CTL memory persistence in the AML model, we challenged
mice with wt AML cells 4 months after the rejection of live IL12-AML
cells. All the mice in this experiment were resistant to the challenge
(Fig 7B). Three months later, spleens from these mice were removed and
assayed for in vitro leukemia-specific CTL activity. As shown in Fig
7C, splenocytes from immunized mice generated a cytolytic response upon
stimulation with wt AML cells. The response was AML-specific, because
the same cells did not lyse alloantigen-presenting EL-4
(H-2b) cells. These results indicate that, in this model,
the rejection of live IL12-AML cells is mediated almost exclusively by
CD8+ T cells, which then develop into long-lived
leukemia-specific memory cells.


View larger version (2054K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 7.
Rejection of live IL12-AML cells is CD8+
T-cell dependent and generates long-lasting leukemia-specific immunity.
(A) Groups of SJL mice were injected IP on 3 consecutive days with 150 µg of purified MoAb of either 53.672 hybridoma ( ) or GK1.5
hybridoma ( ). One day after the last injection, 1 mouse from each
group was killed and the depletion was verified in spleen cells by flow
cytometry. The remaining mice were injected IV with 105
live IL12-AML cells, and the antibody injections continued twice weekly
for 3 weeks. Control mice were treated with isotype control rat IgG
( ). All mice depleted of CD8+ T cells developed lethal
leukemia, whereas only 20% of CD4+ T-cell-depleted mice
developed leukemia and 80% rejected the IL12-AML cells. All of the
control mice rejected the IL12-AML cells. (B) Groups of mice were
injected IV with 105 live IL12-AML ( ) or control ( )
cells. All IL12-AML-injected mice rejected the leukemic cells, whereas
all control mice developed lethal leukemia. Mice that rejected IL12-AML
cells were challenged 4 months later with 105 live wt AML
cells. All of the challenged mice were immune against AML cells and did
not develop leukemia. Three months after the challenge, 3 mice were
killed and their splenocytes were used for CTL assays. (C)
Splenocytes from vaccinated mice were stimulated in vitro with
irradiated AML cells as described in Materials and Methods. Six days
later, cells were harvested and used as effector cells in the indicated
E:T ratios. Target cells (autologous H-2s AML or control
H-2b EL-4 cells) were incubated with 51Cr for
90 minutes. The standard 4-hour CTL assays were set up in a total
volume of 0.2 mL/well in 96-well microtiter plates. All conditions were
set up in quadruplicate. As the control in the experiment, normal SJL
splenocytes were tested for CTL activity on AML (naive/AML) and EL-4
cells (naive/EL-4). Splenocytes from vaccinated mice lysed autologous
AML (vac/AML) but not EL-4 cells (vac/EL-4).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we have used a murine primary AML model to assess the
in vivo activity of the cytokine IL-12. The results we present show
that local release of rmIL-12 by retrovirally transduced AML cells
supports the generation of both therapeutic and long-lasting protective
immunity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in this AML model, the
antileukemia immune responses mediated by IL12-AML vaccines are both
IL-12 and IFN- dependent. Of particular importance and clinical
relevance is that this immunization approach has the potential to
eradicate an established leukemic burden without any adverse systemic effects.
At present, gene transduction of autologous tumor cells for vaccination
remains highly individualized and labor intensive. Therefore, we
initiated our AML studies with a simpler therapeutic approach by
treating leukemic mice systemically with rmIL-12. Numerous studies have
demonstrated that systemic rmIL-12 administration mediates antitumor
effects in vivo (reviewed in Brunda et al55). Unfortunately, this type of treatment also leads to dose-dependent toxicity both in mice56 and in humans.57 In the
SJL AML model, systemic treatment with rmIL-12 during the course of the
disease is clinically well tolerated, with treated leukemic mice having no signs of leukemia in the spleen at the time when control animals develop lethal disease (4 weeks after leukemia inoculation). However, neither continuation nor discontinuation of rmIL-12 treatment is able
to prevent leukemia recurrence, and all treated mice die after 2 to 3 weeks. It is conceivable that, although systemic rmIL-12 treatment
supports the development of antileukemia effector responses, it does
not generate memory cytolytic T cells necessary to control the
outgrowth of residual leukemic cells. One possible explanation is that
rmIL-12 initiates nonspecific AML killing that is primarily mediated by
activated NK cells. However, SJL mice are genetically low-NK strain,
and it has been documented that the very low endogenous levels of NK
cytotoxic activity can be poorly augmented with conventional NK
inducers such as polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly
I:C).58 This motivated us to test the in vitro NK activity
of naive SJL mice after in vivo treatment with rmIL-12 in comparison to
treatment with poly I:C as control. Neither treatment resulted in
increased target cell lysis by NK cells (data not shown), suggesting
that NK-mediated, MHC-unrestricted cytotoxicity has a very limited, if
any, role in the generation of the antileukemia immune responses. A
second explanation for the leukemia recurrence in rmIL-12-treated mice
is the potential for immunosuppression as a consequence of chronic
dosing with rIL-12.32,59 Recently, Koblish et
al37 have demonstrated that the high IFN- levels induced
by IL-12 activate macrophages to produce nitric oxide (NO), which, in
turn, leads to suppression of T-cell responses. It has been proposed
that the use of lower or fewer doses of rIL-12 may overcome the
problems related to its transient immunosuppressive side
effects.32 Our attempts to balance a proper, nontoxic
dose/schedule of systemic rmIL-12 and a favorable clinical outcome in
the AML model were unsuccessful, most probably due to the overwhelming tumor kinetics related to AML.
In contrast to systemic rmIL-12 administration, vaccines with
irradiated IL12-AML cells can cure leukemic mice bearing a considerable leukemic burden and can protect naive mice against challenge with wt
AML cells. The potency of IL12-AML vaccines to generate effector and
memory CTLs most probably relies on a sustained low amount of IL-12
released at the tumor site that is adequate to fuel and control local
antileukemia responses without mediating any signals alarming for
downregulatory mechanisms. This scenario is supported by a recent
report demonstrating that IL-12 is a heparin-binding cytokine.60 This property suggests that IL-12 will be
trapped close to its sites of secretion in the tissues by binding to
heparin-like glycosaminoglycans, thus favoring a prolonged paracrine
role without systemic toxic effects.
The critical requirement of IFN- for the IL-12-mediated antitumor
effects has been observed in several tumor models.27,36 In
the AML model, treatment of anti-IFN- MoAb before and concurrent with IL12-AML vaccination abrogates the antileukemia efficacy of the
vaccines. IFN- has been shown to possess both direct antitumor activity and immunomodulating properties, including activation of
macrophages and enhancement of T-cell-mediated
immunity.27,28 We have been unable to show in the SJL AML
model that IFN- has a significant in vitro direct effect on the
proliferation and survival of AML cells for at least 48 hours. However,
in vitro studies show that IFN- increases or induces the expression
of MHC, accessory, and B7 costimulatory molecules on AML cells. Because the biological effects of T-cell-mediated immune responses are controlled by the interaction between T-cell receptor (TCR) and the
respective peptide ligand(s) presented by MHC molecules, increased MHC
expression by AML cells may represent a critical event in the
initiation of the cytolytic T-cell responses against the leukemic cells. Equally important, induction of the costimulatory molecules B7.1
and B7.2 and increased expression of accessory molecules such as the
integrin Mac-1 and the adhesion molecule ICAM-1 leads to the hypothesis
that prolonged AML-T-cell cross-talk mediated by these molecules
significantly contributes to the generation and enhancement of
leukemia-specific T-cell responses.61
It has recently been demonstrated that IFN- induces the paracrine
secretion of chemokines such as IP-10 and monokine induced by IFN-
(MIG).39,41 This family of proteins is involved in the
local recruitment of leukocytes that can mediate an inflammatory response and in the inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation, resulting in inhibition of angiogenesis.62,63 This immune
mechanism could also be implicated in the IL-12/IFN- -mediated
leukemia rejection. Indeed, we have data from gene expression analysis using a murine 6,500 gene chip that show that IP-10 is among several molecules induced by IFN- in AML cells (B. Clancy, unpublished data). It is well established now that solid tumors
promote angiogenesis, and there is increasing evidence that its
blockade results in tumor regression.64,65 At present, it
is not known if AML cells need new vessel formation for their survival
and if AML cells in fact promote angiogenesis, as is the case for solid
tumors. In an attempt to address this issue, we used Matrigel implants as an in vivo assay for AML angiogenesis. Surprisingly, repeated experiments showed that Matrigel implants containing SJL AML cells or
murine lymphoma EL-4 cells had no evidence of vascularization 5 days
after implantation into syngeneic animals (S. Hunter, unpublished data). In the same type of experiments, murine solid
tumor cells (ie, MB49 bladder carcinoma cells) promote significant
vascularization. These observations raise serious questions as to how,
if at all, induction of IP-10 expression participates in the
antileukemia response. It also emphasizes that the role of angiogenesis
and antiangiogenic compounds in systemic hematologic malignancies is a
very important issue that needs to be resolved.
Our challenge experiments have shown that mice are immune against wt
AML cells 4 months after the rejection of live IL12-AML cells. Whereas
the participation of CD4+ T cells in IL12-AML rejection
appears unnecessary, the presence of CD8+ T cells is
absolutely necessary for effective antileukemia immune responses. At
present, the molecular mechanisms controlling the maintenance of memory
T cells in tumors are largely unknown. Although it was suggested
several years ago, it has only recently been demonstrated that
cross-reactive peptides may play an important role in the expansion and
reactivation of CTL clones from the memory CTL pool and may be involved
in the long-term maintenance of antigen-specific T-cell
memory.66 An extrapolation from the findings in these
experimental systems implies that persistence of leukemia-specific
antigens is not necessarily required for memory CTL maintenance. We
plan to address this issue in the AML system in future studies with
adoptive T-cell transfer experiments.
In summary, we have shown that vaccination of mice with IL12-AML cells
initiates immune responses leading to cure of leukemic mice and to
protection of naive mice against wt AML challenge. We have also shown
that, in the SJL AML model, IFN- has an indispensable role for the
efficacy of the vaccines. We have demonstrated that IFN- enhances
the expression of several molecules on AML cells that are known to
strengthen APC-T-cell interactions, thus facilitating the development
of effector T cells and memory CTL.
From a clinical standpoint, the large safety profile of the IL12-AML
vaccines presented here, together with previously established safety
issues in other cytokine gene therapy studies, is of critical importance in allowing outpatient testing of AML patients in the adjuvant therapy situation. The practical considerations for
large-scale testing and application of autologous tumor vaccines are
simpler in AML than in any other solid tumor type. This is because the requirement for availability of large numbers of tumor cells can be
easily addressed in liquid malignancies such as AML. Our efforts are
currently being directed toward optimizing phase I clinical trial
designs, and we anticipate that AML cell vaccines will ultimately become part of standard AML treatment in the eradication of MRD.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors thank Sharon Hunter and Joyce Johnson for technical help,
Dr Brian Clancy for the gene chip experiments, Dr Page Bouchard for
reviewing the spleen histology slides, and Dr Stan Wolf for critical
review of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted April 19, 1999; accepted August 23, 1999.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. This article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address reprint requests to Kyriaki Dunussi-Joannopoulos, MD, PhD,
Genetics Institute, 1 Burtt Rd, Andover, MA 01810.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Pardoll DM:
Cancer vaccines.
Nat Med
4:525, 1998
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Hodi FS, Dranoff G:
Genetically modified tumor cell vaccines.
Cancer Gene Ther
7:471, 1998
3.
Simons JW, Mikhak B:
Ex-vivo gene therapy using cytokine-transduced tumor vaccines: Molecular and clinical pharmacology.
Semin Oncol
25:661, 1998
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Nanda NK, Sercarz EE:
Induction of anti-self-immunity to cure cancer.
Cell
82:13, 1995
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Sotomayor EM, Borrello I, Levitsky HI:
Tolerance and cancer: A critical issue in tumor immunology.
Crit Rev Oncog
7:433, 1996
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Schwartz RH:
Costimulation of T lymphocytes: The Role of CD28, CTLA-4, and B7//BB1 in interleukin-2 production and immunotherapy.
Cell
71:1065, 1992
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
June CH, Bluestone JA, Nadler LM, Thompson CB:
The B7 and CD28 receptor families.
Immunol Today
15:321, 1994
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Palm N, Germann T, Goedert S, Hoehn P, Koelsch S, Rude E, Schmitt E:
Co-development of naive CD4+ cells towards T helper type 1 or T helper type 2 cells induced by a combination of IL-12 and IL-4.
Immunobiology
196:475, 1996
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Wenner CA, Guler ML, Macatonia SE, O'Garra A, Murphy KM:
Roles of IFN-gamma and IFN-alpha in IL-12-induced T helper cell-1 development.
J Immunol
156:1442, 1996
[Abstract]
10.
Bradley LM, Dalton DK, Croft M:
A direct role for IFN-gamma in regulation of Th1 cell development.
J Immunol
157:1350, 1996
[Abstract]
11.
Chen L, Linsley PS, Hellström KE:
Costimulation of T cells for tumor immunity.
Immunol Today
14:483, 1993
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|