|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 94 No. 6 (September 15), 1999:
pp. 2007-2019
Defensin Promotes the Binding of Lipoprotein(a) to Vascular Matrix
By
Khalil Bdeir,
William Cane,
Gabriela Canziani,
Irwin Chaiken,
John Weisel,
Marlys L. Koschinsky,
Richard M. Lawn,
Peter G. Bannerman,
Bruce S. Sachais,
Alice Kuo,
Mark A. Hancock,
John Tomaszewski,
P.N. Raghunath,
Tomas Ganz,
Abd Al-Roof Higazi, and
Douglas B. Cines
From the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medicine,
Cell Biology, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
PA; the School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Delaware,
Newark, DE; the Department of Biochemistry, Queen's University,
Kingston, Ontario, Canada; the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA; the Division of Pulmonary and
Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los
Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; and the Department of Clinical Biochemistry,
Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Centers, Jerusalem, Israel.
 |
ABSTRACT |
Retention of lipoproteins within the vasculature is a central event
in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. However, the signals that
mediate this process are only partially understood. Prompted by
putative links between inflammation and atherosclerosis, we previously
reported that -defensins released by neutrophils are present in
human atherosclerotic lesions and promote the binding of lipoprotein(a)
[Lp(a)] to vascular cells without a concomitant increase in
degradation. We have now tested the hypothesis that this accumulation
results from the propensity of defensin to form stable complexes with
Lp(a) that divert the lipoprotein from its normal cellular degradative
pathways to the extracellular matrix (ECM). In accord with this
hypothesis, defensin stimulated the binding of Lp(a) to vascular
matrices approximately 40-fold and binding of the reactants to the
matrix was essentially irreversible. Defensin formed stable,
multivalent complexes with Lp(a) and with its components, apoprotein
(a) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), as assessed by
optical biosensor analysis, gel filtration, and immunoelectron
microscopy. Binding of defensin/Lp(a) complexes to matrix was inhibited
(>90%) by heparin and by antibodies to fibronectin (>70%), but
not by antibodies to vitronectin or thrombospondin. Defensin increased
the binding of Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) to purified fibronectin more than
30-fold. Whereas defensin and Lp(a) readily traversed the endothelial
cell membranes individually, defensin/Lp(a) complexes lodged on the
cell surface. These studies demonstrate that -defensins released
from activated or senescent neutrophils stimulate the binding of an
atherogenic lipoprotein to the ECM of endothelial cells, a process that
may contribute to lipoprotein accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE DEVELOPMENT OF atherosclerosis
results from an interplay among diverse factors, including endothelial
cell denudation and activation, adherence and activation of platelets,
hyperlipidemia, oxidation of lipoproteins, infiltration of the vessel
wall by macrophages and their conversion to foam cells, and smooth
muscle cell proliferation and migration, among others.1
Although many prospective and cross-sectional studies demonstrate that
elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]1 are risk factors for atherosclerosis (eg,
see Bostom et al2 and Assmann et al3), the
overall complexity of the process may help to explain why no single
factor correlates with disease incidence or severity in all
individuals.4 Indeed, dyslipoproteinemia and other known
risk factors have been estimated to account for only approximately half
of the interindividual variability in the risk of developing
atherosclerosis.5,6
Plasma levels of Lp(a) and other lipoproteins may not correlate with
pathogenic events more closely, because additional factors regulate
their interaction with the vasculature. The rate of lipoprotein transport into vessel walls exceeds the rate of egress or
catabolism.7,8 This suggests that factors contributing to
the retention of lipoproteins in vessel walls may contribute to
atherogenesis.5,9,10 Vascular retention may be a
prerequisite for subsequent injurious events such as monocyte
migration,11 lipoprotein oxidation, uptake by scavenger
receptors, generation of foam cells, and the induction of smooth muscle
cell proliferation. In accord with this concept, reducing vascular
retention time of lipoproteins may help to limit oxidant-induced
vascular injury.12 Yet, considerable gaps remain in our
understanding of how lipoproteins such as Lp(a) accumulate in
atherosclerotic vessels13.
Lp(a) closely resembles LDL in its content of cholesterol,
phospholipid, and apolipoprotein B-100, but differs by the presence of
an attached glycoprotein, known as apoprotein (a)
[apo(a)], which invests the molecule with additional
properties. Apo(a) is a modular protein composed of multiple tandem
repeats of a sequence that closely resembles plasminogen kringle IV at
its amino terminus followed by sequences that closely resemble kringle V and the protease domain of plasminogen.14 All apo(a)
isoforms contain 10 distinct classes of kringle IV repeats. The
variable number (<10 to >50 copies) of type IV-2 repeats is
responsible for the size heterogeneity among Lp(a)
isoforms.15 The sequence of kringle IV type 10 (alternately
designated KIV-37) resembles that of plasminogen kringle IV most
closely, especially with respect to the composition of its
lysine-binding site (LBS; see below). Apo(a) binds to apoB initially
through noncovalent associations involving kringle IV types
6-816 and subsequently by covalent binding through
Cys4057 in kringle IV-9.17
Lp(a) binds to fibrin, fibronectin, proteoglycans, and cell
surfaces18-21 through kringle (LBS)-dependent and, perhaps,
kringle-independent processes.22 Residues in kringle IV-37
that contribute to binding have been identified through the study of
primate homologues,23 recombinant kringles,24
natural polymorphisms in the human protein,23,25 and, more
recently, the study of transgenic mice expressing apo(a) variants.26,27 Apo(a) contains binding sites for fibrin
that are masked in the Lp(a) particle but are exposed by proteolytic digestion.23 Lp(a) competes with plasminogen for binding to fibrin and to cells18,19,28 and inhibits plasmin-dependent fibrinolysis directly.29,30 Inhibition of plasmin formation may contribute to the terminal thrombotic complications associated with
plaque rupture and impede the activation of latent transforming growth
factor (TGF ), a potent inhibitor of smooth muscle
cell (SMC) proliferation.31,32
Notwithstanding this knowledge, the mechanism by which the retention of
Lp(a) in the vasculature is regulated is only partially understood. One
insight in this process comes from the emerging appreciation of the
relationship between inflammation and atherosclerosis (see
Ridker33 and Tracy et al34 for review). For
example, macrophages play a central role in the development of
atherosclerosis.1,35 In addition, plasma concentrations of
ferritin, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein have been
identified as independent risk factors in the development of ischemic
events and the probability of response to certain forms of
therapy.36 A correlation between neutrophil numbers and
atherosclerosis has also been observed in numerous studies (eg,
Weijemberg et al37 and Zalokar et al38). Neutrophil activation leads to diverse biochemical changes, including the generation of hydrogen peroxide and oxygen radicals and the release
of lysosomal enzymes that may alter vascular function.
Activated neutrophils also release -defensins, a family of closely
related peptides that comprise approximately 5% of their total protein
content.39 Defensins are incorporated into the cell
membranes of prokaryotic organisms within phagolysosomes, disrupting
ion fluxes and eventuating in lysis of the organisms.40 However, defensins are also released into the circulation during phagocytosis, a result of which plasma concentrations, which are normally less than 15 nmol/L, may approach 50 µmol/L during severe infection.41,42
-Defensins are small (29 to 35 amino acid) peptides with structural
features suggesting that they may regulate the binding of lipoproteins
to the vasculature.43,44 One surface of the defensin
molecule is hydrophobic, which enables these proteins to polymerize in
lipid membranes and, conceivably, in lipoproteins. The other surface is
hydrophilic and contains 3 free arginines that may enable defensin to
bind to lipoprotein receptors as well as to proteoglycans, analogous to
mechanism by which cationic residues contribute to the binding of
apoB.45,46
We have previously reported that -defensins are found in human
atherosclerotic lesions.47,48 We also observed that
-defensins bind to cultured human endothelial cells and vascular
smooth muscle cells, inhibit tissue type plasminogen activator-mediated
fibrinolysis,48-50 and promote binding of
Lp(a).48 It is of interest that the enhanced binding of
Lp(a) was not accompanied by an increase in lipoprotein degradation.
The purpose of this study was to consider 2 nonmutually exclusive
hypotheses to explain how defensin promotes the accumulation of Lp(a)
by vascular cells, ie, that defensin promotes the binding of Lp(a) to
vascular matrices and/or that defensin inhibits the processes by which
the lipoprotein is degraded.51,52
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials
Defensin.
Defensins (human neutrophil peptides 1 and 2) were prepared from human
plasma and radiolabeled as described previously40,50; each
protein migrated as a single band on sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Rabbit
polyclonal and mouse monoclonal anti-HNP-1, which recognize HNP-2 and
HNP-3, but not HNP-4 or HD-5, were prepared as described.53
Lipoproteins.
Lipoproteins were isolated from human plasma by ultracentrifugation at
1.21 g/mL. Lp(a) was isolated using lysine-sepharose chromatography.
The fraction that binds to lysine-sepharose was brought to 7.5% CsCl
(wt/wt) and centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 27 hours to separate Lp(a)
from triglyceride-rich material. LDL was purified from the fraction
that did not bind to the lysine sepharose, as described.54
All lipoprotein preparations were filtered under sterile conditions,
aliquoted into plastic tubes, and stored under N2 at
4°C without exposure to light in 0.01% Na2EDTA, 0.1%
NaN3, and 1 mmol/L benzamidine until use. The purity of
Lp(a) and the apparent molecular weight (Mr) of the apo(a) was determined by SDS-PAGE (3% to 9% acrylamide gradient gel) stained
with Coomassie blue under reduced and nonreduced
conditions.54 Most studies were performed using Lp(a)
containing apo(a) (Mr ~500 kD) on SDS-PAGE. Native apo(a) was
isolated from Lp(a) as described.55 Lp(a) and apo(a) were
radiolabeled with 125I using a modification of the iodine
monochloride method54,56 to a specific activity of 3.1 × 105 cpm/pmol. In some experiments, Lp(a) was
oxidized as described.57 The oxidation state of the Lp(a)
was monitored by measuring thiobarbituric acid reactive
substances.58 The migration of oxidized and nonoxidized 125I-Lp(a) was analyzed on 0.5% native agarose gels
(Paragon Lipoprotein "Lipo" electrophoresis kit; Beckman
instruments, Inc, Fullerton, CA) by autoradiography. All preparations
studied were free of oxidized Lp(a) (see Fig 4). To measure the effect
of defensin on the oxidation state of Lp(a),
125I-oxidized or nonoxidized Lp(a) (20 nmol/L) was
incubated in the presence or absence of defensin (10 µmol/L) in
Tris-buffered saline (TBS)/4 mmol/L calcium, and 0.01%
Tween 20 (TBS/Ca/T) buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)
for 1 hour at 37°C. Migration of the labeled proteins under native
conditions on 0.5% agarose gel was analyzed using autoradiography.
Recombinant apo(a) [r-apo(a)], 17K (kringles; Mr ~525 kD), was
prepared as described.59
Antibodies.
Rabbit polyclonal antisera against human TSP-1 was the kind gift of Dr
Jack Lawler (Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA). The IgG
fractions of this antisera and normal rabbit sera were isolated using
protein-G agarose (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD; catalogue no.
15920-010). Human plasma fibronectin was purchased from Life
Technologies (catalogue no. 33016-023); affinity-purified polyclonal
sheep IgG antihuman vitronectin was from Enzyme Research Laboratories,
Inc (Indianaoplis, IN; catalogue no. SAVN-AP); affinity-purified rabbit
IgG antihuman fibronectin was from Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis, MO;
catalogue no. F-3648); and bovine lung heparin was from Sigma
(catalogue no. H-9133).
Cell Culture and Isolation of Extracellular Matrix (ECM)
Cultures of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and
umbilical vein smooth muscle cells (HVSMC) were prepared and characterized as described.60 Human SMC from descending
abdominal aorta were purchased from Clonetics (San Diego, CA). CHO
cells deficient in xylosyl transferase
(XT / )61 were provided by J. Esko
(University of California, San Diego, CA) and K. Williams (Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA). ECM was prepared
as described.62 Briefly, HUVEC or each source of SMC were
seeded onto 96-well Falcon Multiwell tissue culture dishes (Becton
Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) at an initial density of 2 to 3 × 104 cells/well. Five to 7 days after the cells reached
confluency, the monolayer was washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS). The cells were incubated for 3 minutes at 22°C with
PBS/0.5% Triton X-100 and then with NH4OH (25 mmol/L) for
an additional 8 minutes at 22°C. Detached cells were removed by
washing the plate 4 times with TBS containing calcium (10 mmol/L Tris,
150 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.5, and 4 mmol/L CaCl2;
TBS/Ca2+). The matrices contained no intact cells as judged
by light microscopy. Matrix-coated wells were dried and stored at
80°C until use. ECM-coated plates were used within 1 week of
preparation, with no change in activity. In other experiments, 96-well
plates (Immulon 2; Dynatech Labs Inc, Chantilly, VA) were incubated
with purified fibronectin (5 µg/mL in TBS/Ca2+) for 12 hours at 4°C and washed as described above before use.
Binding of Lp(a) to ECM or Coated Fibronectin
To measure the binding of Lp(a), wells were coated with HUVEC- or
HVSMC-derived ECM or with purified human fibronectin. Unreactive sites
were blocked by adding 0.3% BSA in TBS/Ca2+ containing
0.05% Tween-20 (TBS/Ca/T) for 1 hour at 22°C, and the wells were
washed 3 times with binding buffer composed of TBS/Ca/T and 0.1% BSA.
125I-Lp(a) or 125I-apo(a) was added alone or in
the presence of various concentrations of defensin or defensin plus
potential inhibitors (eg, heparin and -aminocaproic acid [ ACA])
in the same buffer for 1 hour at 37°C. Unbound ligand was removed,
the wells were washed 4 times with binding buffer, 2 N NaOH was added,
and the matrix-associated radioactivity was counted. To measure the
rate of Lp(a) elution, 125I-Lp(a) was incubated with cell
matrix alone or in the presence of defensin. The matrix was then washed
4 times, binding buffer was added, and the radioactivity eluting into
the buffer at 37°C was measured at various times over the next 72 hours. To identify Lp(a) binding sites, HUVEC- or HVSMC-derived
matrices were preincubated with the IgG fraction of
antibodies to specific matrix proteins (50 µg/mL) or with the same
concentration of control IgG for 30 minutes at 22°C.
125I-Lp(a) in the presence or absence of defensin was then
added for 1 hour at 37°C, the matrices were washed, and the bound
radioactivity was measured as described above.
Binding of Defensin to Lp(a)
Binding of defensin to Lp(a) and its components was measured using gel
filtration, surface plasmon resonance, and immunoelectron microscopy.
Gel filtration.
Gel filtration experiments were performed under conditions similar to
those used to measure binding of Lp(a)/defensin to cell matrices.
Specifically, 125I-HNP-1 (0.019 to 10 µmol/L) was
incubated alone or in the presence of 10 nmol/L Lp(a) or BSA in
TBS/Ca/T (final volume, 60 µL) for 1 hour at 37°C. The proteins
were passed over a Bio-spin 30 column (Bio-Gel P-30 polyacrylamide gel,
catalogue no. 732-6006; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and the
radioactivity in the excluded volume was measured; small proteins like
defensin (3.5 kD) are expected to be retained in the these columns
(exclusion limit, ~40 kD). Binding of 125I-HNP-1 to BSA
measured in parallel was minimal and was subtracted from each data
point as a control for nonspecific interactions.
Surface plasmon resonance.
Binding kinetics of defensin to Lp(a) and to its components was
measured using a B2000 optical biosensor (Biacore AB, Uppsala, Sweden).63 This method detects binding interactions in real time and enables association and dissociation rate constants to be
estimated. For these studies, Lp(a), native apo(a), LDL, and recombinant apo(a) were coupled to CM5-research grade sensor chip flow
cells (Biacore AB) using standard
procedures.64 The sensor surface was activated for 7 minutes with an equimolar mixture of 0.1 mol/L
N-hydroxysuccinimide/N-ethyl-N'-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]
carbodiimide hydrochloride (Pierce, Rockford, IL) 1:1 (vol/vol) at a
flow rate of 5 µL/min. Protein was then immobilized to the sensor
surface at a flow rate of at least 10 µL/min, and the unreacted amine
groups were blocked with 1 mol/L ethanolamine, pH 8.5. Sensor surfaces
were coated with ligands (15 µg/mL) in 10 mmol/L NaAc buffer, pH 4.0. Newly immobilized ligand surfaces were equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4, 0.005% Tween-20 (binding and running buffer). Surfaces were
regenerated after each binding interaction by short pulses (20 to 30 seconds) of 10 mmol/L NaAc buffer, pH 2.5 to 3.0, or 5 mmol/L HCl, pH 2.5. Binding of 0.019 to 10 µmol/L defensin (HNP-1 or
HNP-2) was measured at 25°C at a flow rate of 30 µL/min. The bulk
shift due to interaction of defensin with similarly
activated/inactivated uncoated chips was subtracted from the binding
signal at each concentration to correct for nonspecific interactions.
Immobilized BSA was used as an additional control for protein binding.
Binding of defensin to sensor surface-immobilized Lp(a), apo(a), or LDL
was detected by a change in the refractive index of the solution in
immediate contact with the sensor surface as a function of
time.65 Kinetic data were evaluated as described previously.66 The ordinate intercept of the extrapolated
linear portion of the derivative of the binding signal that corresponds to the signal at steady state in resonance units (RU) was plotted as a
function of concentration of defensin in the inserts to Fig 5. At the
lower concentrations of defensin, binding at steady state (Req) was
also calculated using the BIAevaluation software (version 3.0, 1997;
Biacore AB). Values obtained by each method were in
excellent agreement. These values were then used to estimate the
equillibrium dissociation constants (kds).
Electron microscopy.
Rotary-shadowed samples were prepared by spraying a dilute solution of
protein (final concentration, ~40 µg/mL) in a volatile buffer (0.05 mol/L ammonium formate at pH 7.4) and 70% glycerol onto freshly
cleaved mica and shadowing with tungsten followed by deposition of a
carbon film in a vacuum evaporator (Denton Vacuum Co, Cherry Hill,
NJ).67,68 Ratios of Lp(a) to defensin were
generally 1:10 or 1:22, and samples were incubated for 30 minutes at
22°C. A 10× excess of rabbit anti-HNP-1 sera was incubated for an additional 30 minutes at 22°C. All experiments were repeated several times and many micrographs were taken of randomly selected areas to ensure that the results were reproducible and representative. All of the specimens were examined in a Philips 400 electron microscope (Philips Electronic Instruments Co, Mahwah, NJ), usually operating at
80 kV.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to examine the effect of
defensin on the endocytosis of Lp(a). Subconfluent monolayers of HUVEC
were grown on fibronectin-coated glass coverslips overnight. The cells
were washed 3 times with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM;
Life Technologies) supplemented with 1% BSA. Defensin (10 µmol/L),
Lp(a) (40 nmol/L), or defensin plus Lp(a) was added in the same media
for 1 hour either at 4°C or at 37°C for 30 minutes. Cells
treated with defensin or defensin/Lp(a) in this manner were greater
than 95% viable as judged by exclusion of trypan blue. The cells were
rinsed in PBS to remove unbound ligands and fixed in 2%
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 minutes, followed by cold methanol
( 20°C) for 8 minutes. The coverslips were incubated with a
mouse monoclonal antidefensin antibody (5 µg/mL) and/or affinity-purified rabbit anti-Lp(a) antibody (5 µg/mL; Cortex Biochem, San Leandro, CA; catalogue no. CR9018RP) for 1 hour. Coverslips incubated with the same concentrations of nonimmune mouse
sera or IgG isolated from normal rabbit sera served as the negative
controls. The Ig-treated cells were washed and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated donkey antirabbit Ig or rhodamine tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated
donkey antimouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was added for 30 minutes. Cell nuclei were stained with 2 µg/mL
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Immunolabeled cells
were sectioned optically using a computer-interfaced, laser-scanning
microscope (Leica TCS 4D confocal microscope; Leica, Exton,
PA). This equipment is fitted with both an argon and
krypton-argon laser, permitting simultaneous analysis of fluorescein
and rhodamine chromophores, with the option of rescanning for
UV-excitable fluorochromes. The output, which is up to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels, is linked to an image-processing workstation, permitting
pixel by pixel quantification, registration, and averaging of multiple images.
Formation of Foam Cells
J774 murine macrophages were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2 mmol/L glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) in 24 Multiwell dishes
(Falcon, Plymouth, UK). The cells were washed free of FCS and the
medium was replaced with DMEM containing 200 nmol/L native or oxidized
Lp(a) in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/L defensin (HNP-2).
3H-oleic acid (OA; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) was
added (100 µmol/L) as an oleate:albumin complex (3:1 molar ratio) for
24 hours at 37°C and the incorporation of 3H-OA was
measured. To do so, the medium was collected, the cells were washed 4 times with PBS, and 1 mL absolute ethanol was added for 2 hours. The
ethanol extract was separated by thin-layer chromatography on silica
gels (Analtech, Inc, Newark, DE). Bands were identified with iodine and isolated, and the radioactivity in the cholesterol ester fraction was counted.
 |
RESULTS |
We previously reported that leukocyte defensins promote the binding of
Lp(a) to cultured human endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells
without a concomitant increase in degradation. We investigated 2 possible mechanisms to explain these findings: ie, that defensin
promotes the binding and retention of Lp(a) on vascular matrices and/or
that defensin promotes the binding of Lp(a) to cellular receptors but
protects it from degradation.
Defensin Promotes Binding of Lp(a) to Endothelial Cell Matrix
We asked first whether defensin promotes the binding and retention of
Lp(a) by vascular matrices. Binding of Lp(a) (20 nmol/L) to HUVEC
matrix was stimulated approximately 40-fold by 10 µmol/L defensin
(Fig 1A). Binding of 125I-Lp(a)
in the presence of defensin [defensin/Lp(a)] was inhibited greater
than 80% by 20-fold molar excess unlabeled Lp(a) (Fig 1A). Defensin
did not stimulate the binding of 125I-Lp(a) in the absence
of matrix (not shown). Defensin promoted 125I-Lp(a) binding
to HUVEC matrix in a dose-dependent and saturable manner (Fig 1B).
Binding of Lp(a) approached saturation at a defensin concentration of
10 µmol/L, consistent with previous results using intact
cells.48,50 Identical results were obtained using oxidized 125I-Lp(a) or Lp(a) containing the apo(a) isoform (Mr
~350 kD) and when matrices derived from HVSMC were studied (not
shown). The binding of defensin/125I-Lp(a) to matrix was
essentially irreversible. Whereas approximately 30% of the bound
ligand dissociated from the matrix over the initial 3 hours, there was
no further loss over the succeeding 72 hours (Fig 2). Thus, defensin caused a sustained
net 40-fold increase in matrix-bound Lp(a).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Defensin promotes the binding of Lp(a) to HUVEC matrix.
(A) 125I-Lp(a) (20 nmol/L) or mixtures of defensin (10 µmol/L) plus 125I-Lp(a) (20 nmol/L) were incubated with
HUVEC matrix in the presence of buffer ( , ) or 20-fold
molar excess cold Lp(a) ( ) for 1 hour at 37°C, and
the bound radioactivity was measured. The mean ± SD of 3 experiments
is shown. This corresponds to an increase in bound Lp(a) from a mean of
2.9 fmol in the absence of defensin to 96 fmol in the presence of
defensin. The mean ± SD of 3 experiments is shown. (B)
125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) was incubated with HUVEC matrix in
the presence of the indicated concentrations of defensin for 1 hour at
37°C, and the bound radioactivity was measured. The data are
expressed relative to the binding of 125I-Lp(a) alone. The
mean ± SD of 3 experiments is shown.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Defensin and defensin/125I-Lp(a) bind tightly
to HUVEC matrix. 125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L; ) or 2.5 µmol/L defensin/10 nmol/L 125I-Lp(a) ( ) were incubated
with HUVEC matrix as described in the legend to Fig 1 for 1 hour at
37°C. The matrix was washed 4 times with 200 µL binding buffer,
200 µL binding buffer was added for the indicated times, and the
bound radioactivity was measured. The mean of 2 experiments
performed in triplicate is shown.
|
|
Binding of Lp(a) to matrix in the presence of defensin acquired marked
sensitivity to inhibition by heparin (Fig
3A; half maximal 0.01 U/mL, Fig 3B). In contrast, the binding to matrix of neither 125I-defensin (2.5 µmol/L) nor
125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) added individually was inhibited by
heparin at concentrations as high as 6 U/mL. Experiments were then
perfomed to evaluate 3 possible explanations for these observations:
(1) defensin might form stable complexes with Lp(a) generating
heparin-sensitive epitopes that promote binding to matrix; (2) heparin
might inhibit the formation of these complexes or block the induced
epitope directly; or (3) defensin might neutralize negatively charged residues on the matrix, permitting Lp(a) access to its binding sites.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Binding of defensin/125I-Lp(a) to matrix is
heparin sensitive. (A) 125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) or a mixture
of defensin (2.5 µmol/L) plus 125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) or
125I-defensin (2.5 µmol/L) were incubated with HUVEC
matrix in the presence of buffer ( ) or heparin (2 U/mL; ) for 1 hour at 37°C, and the bound radioactivity was measured. The mean ± SD of 3 experiments is shown. (B) Heparin inhibits the binding of
defensin (2.5 µmol/L)/125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) complexes to
matrix in a dose-dependent manner. The complexes were incubated with
HUVEC matrix in the presence of the indicated concentrations of
heparin, and the bound radioactivity was measured. Bound radioactivity
is expressed relative to the binding of Lp(a) alone. The mean ± SD of
3 experiments is shown.
|
|
Formation of Stable Complexes Between Defensin and Lp(a)
Several approaches were used to determine whether defensin forms
complexes with Lp(a), the portion(s) of the lipoprotein involved, and
the capacity of such complexes to bind to matrix. Formation of
complexes between defensin and Lp(a) was evident by immunoelectron microscopy (Fig 4). Anti-defensin antibody
bound to Lp(a) particles preincubated with defensin were readily
detected, whereas no binding of the antibodies to Lp(a) alone was seen
in this case (Fig 4) or when nonimmune sera was incubated with
defensin/Lp(a) mixtures (not shown).

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
ImmunoEM appearance of defensin/Lp(a) complex. Electron
micrographs of defensin/Lp(a) complexes. Lp(a) was incubated alone or
in the presence of 1:10 molar ratio of defensin for 30 minutes at
22°C followed by incubation with anti-defensin sera for 30 minutes
at 22°C. All specimens were rotary shadowed with tungsten. A
gallery of selected examples of individual Lp(a) molecules attached to
anti-defensin antibody in the presence and absence (lower panel, far
right) of defensin is shown. No binding was seen when nonimmune sera
was substituted for anti-defensin sera. The arrows denote the location
of the anti-defensin antibodies.
|
|
The kinetics of defensin binding to immobilized Lp(a) and its
components, LDL and apo(a), was then measured as surface plasmon resonance. Defensin bound to intact Lp(a) in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig 5A). Binding to Lp(a) appears to
involve higher and lower affinity components. A similar conclusion was
evident from the analysis of the dR/dt vs R plots (see inserts to Fig
5A through C). Binding of defensin to Lp(a) was readily evident at
concentrations well below those at which appreciable binding was
observed to blank surfaces. In addition, binding of defensin to
immobilized albumin (inset to Fig 5D) and to the amino-terminal
fragment of urokinase (not shown) was approximately 10% of the binding
to Lp(a) over the same range of concentrations. The first component of
binding appeared to reach saturation at a defensin concentration of
approximately 600 nmol/L. The apparent stoichiometry of interaction between defensin and Lp(a), estimated from the ratio of immobilized and
bound mass proportional to response, exceeded 1 at concentrations of
defensin greater than 625 nmol/L. At concentrations of defensin greater
than 1.25 µmol/L, binding to an apparently lower affinity site
predominated. This signal was not an artifact of coating or
self-association of ligand, in that no aggregation of defensin was
observed using empty or BSA-coated sensor surfaces. In addition, the
same pattern of binding was seen at a lower Lp(a) surface density (400 RU, not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
Binding of defensin to Lp(a) and its components assessed
using the optical biosensor. Defensin (9 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L) was
incubated with immobilized Lp(a) (5,000 RU; A) or its components: LDL
(445 RU; B), native apo(a) (1,400 RU; C), and recombinant apo(a) (900 RU; D). The interaction of defensin with a high surface density of
immobilized BSA (2,400 RU) is shown in the insert to (D). Both the
association and dissociation phases are shown. The inserts in (A)
through (C) show both dR/dt × R plots (at 5 µmol/L defensin) and
the binding isotherms at equilibrium to each component.
|
|
We next asked whether defensin bound to the apo(a) or to the LDL
components of Lp(a). The sensorgrams in Fig 5C and D show that defensin
bound to both natural and recombinant apo(a) with the high- and
low-affinity components seen with intact Lp(a). The maximum binding
response was again greater than 1:1. Defensin also bound in a
dose-dependent and saturable manner to LDL (Fig 5B). A hyperbolic
binding isotherm was obtained, consistent with a single class of
binding sites at all concentrations of defensin studied
(0 to 5 µmol/L). Binding of defensin to LDL showed a
10-fold lower affinity than binding to isolated apo(a). Analysis of
dR/dt versus R plots also suggest that defensin bound to LDL with a simple kinetic. However, the binding capacity of immobilized LDL somewhat exceeded the predicted values for a 1:1 interaction. Dissociation of defensin from the Lp(a) surface was rapid, but the
signal did not return to baseline after buffer wash (>450-second-long washes). Defensin dissociated more rapidly from apo(a) (native and
recombinant) than from Lp(a), but in each case the dissociation appeared to be biphasic, similar to the dissociation of defensin from
Lp(a). Defensin dissociated even more rapidly from immobilized LDL than
from either Lp(a) or apo(a) (return to baseline signal ~300 seconds).
Binding of 125I-defensin to Lp(a) was then assessed under
conditions similar to those used to study binding to ECM using gel filtration. A dose-dependent increase in binding of defensin to Lp(a)
was observed over the same range of concentrations evident using the
optical biosensor approach. Complex formation was again evident at
concentrations below those associated with stimulation of matrix
binding. At defensin concentrations greater than 1 to 1.5 µmol/L,
formation of defensin/Lp(a) complexes (Fig
6) closely paralleled matrix binding (Fig 1). Defensin also retarded
the migration of unoxidized and oxidized 125I-Lp(a) on
native agarose gels (Fig 7). Formation of
defensin/Lp(a) complexes was not inhibited by heparin at concentrations
as high as 10 U/mL or by 100 mmol/L ACA assessed
either by gel filtration or optical biosensor analysis (not shown).
This result implies that defensin forms stable soluble complexes with
Lp(a) that acquire novel epitopes that enhance their capacity to bind
to matrix. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of heparin occurs after
complex formation and before binding to matrix.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
Binding of 125I-defensin to Lp(a) assessed by
gel filtration. Fixed amounts Lp(a) or BSA (10 nmol/L each) were
incubated with the indicated concentrations of
125I-defensin (HNP-1) for 1 hour at 37°C. The mixtures
were loaded on a Bio-spin 30 columns, and the excluded radioactivity
was measured. The amount of 125I-defensin/PBS and the
amount of 125I-defensin/BSA in the void volume were
identical at each concentration and were taken as measure of
nonspecific binding. The insert shows the void volume of columns
containing 125I-defensin plus Lp(a), BSA, and buffer.
|
|

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 7.
Migration of defensin/125I-Lp(a) complexes on
native gels. Unoxidized and oxidized 125I-Lp(a) (20 nmol/L)
was incubated with defensin (HNP-1; 10 µmol/L) or buffer for 1 hour
at 37°C, and the migration of the labeled lipoproteins towards the
positive electrode on 0.5% agarose gels was analyzed using
autoradiography. Lane 1, native Lp(a); lane 2, Lp(a)/defensin; lane 3, oxidized Lp(a); lane 4, oxidized Lp(a)/defensin.
|
|
Characterization of Defensin/Lp(a) Binding to Matrix
Studies were then performed to identify the binding site(s) for
defensin/Lp(a) complexes in matrix based on the inhibitory effect of
heparin. One set of potential binding domains are proteoglycan components of the matrix. To examine this possibility, we measured the
binding of defensin/125I-Lp(a) to matrices derived from a
CHO cell line (XT / ) that does not synthesize
heparan or chondroitin suflate-containing proteoglycans. Binding of
defensin/125I-Lp(a) to XT / matrix
was reduced by only 30% compared with matrix from control CHO cells
(not shown).
A second set of potential binding sites includes matrix-associated
proteins that contain heparin binding domains. In accord with this,
binding of defensin/Lp(a) to matrix was inhibited 63.3% ± 3.1% by
anti-fibronectin antibodies (P < .0001 v control Ig 15.4% ± 4.7%), whereas binding was little affected by antibodies to 2 other heparin-binding matrix proteins: thrombospondin (24.3%, P > .05 v control Ig) and vitronectin (0% ± 1.5%, P > .05). Anti-fibronectin antibodies also inhibited
the binding of defensin/Lp(a) complexes to matrix derived from HVSMC
grown in the absence of exogenous fibronectin (not shown).
The interaction of defensin/Lp(a) and defensin/apo(a) with fibronectin
was then studied in more detail. Defensin (5 to 10 µmol/L) stimulated
the binding of 125I-Lp(a) to fibronectin-coated microtiter
wells greater than 30-fold, but had minimal effect on binding to
albumin-coated wells (Fig 8A). Stimulation of apo(a) and Lp(a) binding to fibronectin by defensin
was also evident using optical biosensor analysis (Fig 8B). Fibronectin
(10 nmol/L) bound to apo(a) only in the presence of defensin (Fig 8B1).
Defensin also stimulated the binding of Fn at concentrations (50 nmol/L) at which direct binding to apo(a) could not be detected.
Binding of Fn to Lp(a) also depended on the presence of defensin and
increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 8B2).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 8.
Defensin stimulates the binding of Lp(a) to
purified fibronectin. (A) Solid-phase radioligand binding. Microtiter
wells were coated with 5 µg/mL fibronectin ( ) or BSA ( ),
unreactive sites were blocked with 0.3% BSA, and the binding of
125I-Lp(a) (10 nmol/L) alone or in the presence of the
indicated concentrations of defensin was measured. The mean ± SD of 2 experiments performed in triplicate is shown. (B) Surface plasmon
resonance. (B1) Immobilized apo(a) (960 RU) was incubated with
fibronectin alone (10 and 50 nmol/L) or after preincubation of the chip
with 5 µmol/L defensin. The surface was regenerated at 2,000 seconds,
ie, between the 2 sets of incubation with fibronectin. (B2) Immobilized
Lp(a) was preincubated with defensin (0, 312, 625, 1,250, and 2,500 nmol/L; sensorgrams 1 through 5, respectively), the chip was washed for
3 minutes, and fibronectin was injected at the indicated concentrations
with the appropriate wash steps between injections. Binding of
fibronectin to Lp(a) was not detected at concentrations of defensin
below 0.625 µmol/L.
|
|
We then asked whether defensin induced the binding of apo(a) to
immobilized fibronectin and ECM. Defensin stimulated the binding of
125I-apo(a) to fibronectin and to cell matrix greater than
20-fold and approximately 6-fold, respectively
(Fig 9A and C), which is less than the
stimulation seen with Lp(a). However, binding of both defensin/apo(a)
and defensin/Lp(a) to ECM were comparably sensitive to heparin but not
to ACA (Fig 9A and B). Binding of defensin/apo(a) and defensin/Lp(a)
complexes to fibronectin were somewhat more resistant to heparin than
was binding to matrix (Fig 9C and D). However, binding of
defensin/Lp(a) to fibronectin was more resistant to ACA than the
binding of defensin/apo(a) (Fig 9C and D).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 9.
Defensin stimulates the binding of
125I-apo(a) to HUVEC matrix and to fibronectin. Complexes
composed of 5 µmol/L defensin/20 nmol/L 125I-apo(a) were
incubated with HUVEC matrices (A) or well coated with 5 µg/mL
fibronectin (C) for 1 hour at 37°C alone or in the presence of 100 mmol/L EACA or 2 U/mL heparin, and the bound radioactivity was
determined and expressed as described above. The binding of
125I-Lp(a)/defensin complexes to cell matrix (B) and to
fibronectin (D) was performed under the same conditions as described
above. The mean ± SD of 3 experiments performed in triplicate is
shown.
|
|
Effect of Defensin on Subcellular Distribution of Lp(a) and Foam
Cell Formation
We next asked whether defensin altered the internalization of Lp(a) by
cells that express matrix. HUVEC were incubated with defensin and
Lp(a), alone or in combination, at 4°C or at 37°C, and the
internalization of each ligand was analyzed by confocal microscopy
using monospecific antibodies (Fig 10).
Cell monolayers were sectioned optically to determine the intracellular
distribution of defensin and Lp(a). To do so, the cells were colabeled
with the nuclear dye DAPI. The center of the cells in the z-axis was then defined by the optical section containing nuclei with the widest
diameters. Defensin localized to cell surface at 4°C (not shown)
but was found diffusely throughout the cytoplasm at 37°C (Fig 10C).
Under the same conditions, Lp(a) was found primarily in intracellular
granules (Fig 10B). In contrast, a significant proportion of defensin
and Lp(a) remained associated at the cell periphery when added together
(compare Fig 10C and D). In cotreated cultures (Fig 10D), it was
evident that defensin was concentrated in diffuse bands at the cell
surface in conjunction with clusters of Lp(a), whereas the overall
brightness of interacellular defensin/Lp(a) immunoreactivity was
diminished. No staining was observed with control IgGs (Fig 10A).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 10.
Subcellular distribution of defensin, Lp(a), and
Lp(a)/defensin complexes in HUVECs as assessed by confocal microscopy.
HUVECs incubated with either Lp(a) (50 nmol/L; B) or defensin (10 µmol/L; C) or coincubated with defensin and Lp(a) (D) for 30 minutes
at 37°C and then analyzed by confocal microscopy using polyclonal
Lp(a) antibodies followed by FITC-conjugated antirabbit IgG (detected
as green) and/or a monoclonal antihuman defensin followed by rhodamine
TRITC-conjugated donkey antimouse IgG (detected as red). Normal rabbit
IgGs served as control, as shown in (A). Cell nuclei were stained with
DAPI (detected as blue). Colocalization of defensin and Lp(a) was
assessed by double staining (D) and results in a yellow color (arrows).
|
|
These studies suggest that defensin promotes the retention of Lp(a) on
the extracellular matrix of cells and inhibits endocytosis/degradation. Lp(a) induces a chemotactic factor for monocytes in
HUVECs.69 Lp(a) retained on the matrix is also subject to
oxidation and uptake by scavenger receptors and, thereby, may promote
foam cell formation. To examine the effect of defensin on cholesterol
ester formation, J774 rat macrophages were incubated with unoxidized and oxidized Lp(a) in the presence and absence of defensin and the
incorporation of 3H-oleic acid was measured.
Defensin/oxidized Lp(a) stimulated the incorporation of
3H-oleic acid 4- to 5-fold but had minimal effect in the
absence of oxidation (not shown). Thus, defensin promotes the
incorporation of oleic acid into cellular cholesterol, an important
constituent of foam cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Inflammatory changes within the vessel wall may promote the retention
of Lp(a) and the development of atherosclerosis. In accord with this
possibility, we have found that -defensins, most likely released by
activated or senescent neutrophils, are present in human
atherosclerotic lesions,47,48 bind to cultured endothelial
and vascular smooth muscle cells,48,50 and promote the
binding of Lp(a).48 However, no concomitant increase in Lp(a) degradation was seen, raising the possibility that defensin diverts the lipoprotein to compartments, such as the matrix, wherein degradation occurs slowly, if at all, or that defensin impedes normal
cellular degradative mechanisms. The results of the present study
provide support for both possibilities.
Defensin stimulates the binding of Lp(a) to matrices derived from
cultured human endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells in a
dose-dependent and saturable manner. Binding of Lp(a) to matrix was
enhanced approximately 40-fold at optimal concentrations of defensin,
an enhancement that is several fold higher than was observed with cell
monolayers.48 The enhancement occurred at concentrations of
Lp(a) (1 to 30 nmol/L) that are well within the range found in human
plasma70 and at concentrations of defensin (10 µmol/L)
found in plasma during bacterial infection.41,42 The
concentrations of defensin in the vasculature, especially in the
vicinity of degranulating neutrophils, are unknown, but may be even
higher based on their content in sputum and empyema fluid.71,72 Binding of Lp(a) to vascular matrix in the
presence of defensin was essentially irreversible over 72 hours,
resulting a marked increase in the total amount of lipoprotein
retained. The biochemical changes that prevent the lipoprotein from
dissociating from the matrix in the presence of defensin require
additional study, but are in accord with a recent finding that covalent
linkages develop between Lp(a) and both fibrin and cell
surfaces.73
Defensin may promote Lp(a) binding through several interrelated
mechanisms. First, defensin may bind directly to both the lipoprotein
and to the matrix, providing a bridge between the surfaces. Second,
defensin may bind to the matrix, blocking sites that otherwise limit
lipoprotein deposition. Third, defensin may bind to Lp(a), generating
novel epitopes that are not present in either substituent. Although our
studies do not permit any of these possibilities to be excluded, it is
evident from 3 independent methods of analysis (immunoelectron
microscopy, optical biosensor analysis, and gel filtration
chromatography) that defensin binds directly to Lp(a). Defensin/Lp(a)
complexes acquire novel characteristics that differ from those of
either Lp(a) or defensin alone. The subcellular distribution of
defensin/Lp(a) on the surface of HUVECs differs markedly from that
of Lp(a). Defensin/Lp(a) complexes also migrate differently from Lp(a)
on native gels, suggesting that defensin alters the electrostatic
characteristics of the lipoprotein. Binding of the complexes to matrix
is also more sensitive to inhibition by heparin than is binding of
Lp(a) alone.
Binding of defensin to Lp(a), assessed by surface plasmon resonance,
was judged as specific by the fact that little binding to other
proteins was observed under the same conditions. Analysis of the
sensorgrams demonstrate that binding of defensin to Lp(a) cannot be
described by a simple one to one model. Rather, the existence of at
least 2 classes of binding sites on Lp(a) is suggested by the dR/dt
plots, although other models are possible. The most straightforward
explanation for the observed pattern is that at least one class of
binding sites is present on apo(a) and another on LDL. In support of
this possibility, defensin bound with high affinity to both natural and
recombinant apo(a) and with lower affinity to immobilized LDL, although
we did not attempt to distinguish between the contribution of apoB and
the lipid core in this study. The contribution of LDL to the binding of
defensin/Lp(a) to cell matrix was also quite apparent as defensin
stimulated the binding of Lp(a) to a considerably greater extent than
it did the binding of apo(a). Also, the effect of defensin on the
binding of Lp(a) was achieved at concentrations in the range of its
affinity for LDL.
The possibility that defensin binds to apo(a) and to LDL is consistent
with known features of its structure and binding properties. Binding of
defensin to each component may help to explain the intense signal that
was generated, which was somewhat surprising in view of its small mass.
The optical biosensor and gel filtration experiments indicate that
apo(a) can accommodate more than 1 molecule of defensin. Apo(a) is rich
in sialic acid and contains multiple kringle-IV repeats, several of
which may bind defensin through exposed arginines. Alternatively, the
intense biosensor signal may result from formation of homopolymers in
the lipid core, analagous to the pores formed by defensin within cell
membranes.74 However, the observation that binding to LDL
approached saturation makes it more likely that defensin binding to
higher affinity sites in apo(a) cause conformational changes in the
apoprotein that facilitate its binding to additional, lower affinity
sites. Studies are in progress to identify the binding
sites for defensin in Lp(a) in greater detail.
Binding of defensin to apo(a) and Lp(a) was also evident by gel
filtration performed under the conditions used to measure binding to
cell matrix. These experiments confirmed the dose-dependent nature of
defensin binding to Lp(a), excluding the possibility that the biosensor
findings were artifacts caused by immobilization of Lp(a) on the sensor
chip. These experiments also suggest that the enhanced binding to the
matrix occurs only when multiple molecules of defensin are bound to
Lp(a). Indeed, there appears to be a threshold below which binding of
Lp(a) to matrix is unaffected by defensin and above which there is a
close correlation between the molar ratio of defensin to Lp(a) and
matrix binding. Cationization of Lp(a) by defensin may lead to the
formation of stable salt bridges with anionic components of the matrix.
An alternative explanation is that defensin induces neodeterminants in
Lp(a) that bind directly to matrix and are recognized by heparin. This would explain why binding of defensin/Lp(a) to matrix was inhibited at
concentrations at which little or no effect was seen on either substituent alone, why inhibition of defensin/Lp(a) binding was greater
than could be explained by a total absence of heparan- or chondroitin
sulfate-containing proteoglycans in the matrix, and why antibodies to
matrix proteins with heparin binding domains, such as thrombospondin
and vitronectin, did not inhibit binding.
Our data indicate that defensin promotes binding of Lp(a) to
fibronectin21,75,76: binding of defensin/Lp(a) to cell
matrix was inhibited by anti-fibronectin antibody; defensin increased the binding of Lp(a) to purified fibronectin greater than 30-fold; and
trimolecular complexes containing Lp(a) [or apo(a)], defensin, and
fibronectin were detected using the optical biosensor at concentrations at which little or no binding of Lp(a) alone was seen. The fact that
binding of defensin/Lp(a) to soluble fibronectin was reversible, whereas binding to cell matrix was not, is consistent with the conformational changes that occur when the protein is bound to cells or
is incorporated into the matrix.77 Additional studies will
be required to identify the binding site(s) in fibronectin for defensin
and defensin/Lp(a).
Binding of defensin/Lp(a) complexes to fibronectin altered the
subcellular trafficking of Lp(a) as viewed by confocal microscopy. Defensin bound to the surface of HUVEC at 4°C but was present diffusely throughout the cytoplasm at 37°C, in accord with
functional data reported by others.78 The presence of Lp(a)
within endocytic granules was readily evident, also in accord with
functional data reported in this cell type.52 In contrast,
defensin clearly increased the amount of Lp(a) bound to the cell
surface, confirming our previous studies.48 Furthermore,
the resultant defensin/Lp(a) complexes were coclustered on the cell
periphery and minimal internalization of either component was seen when
the incubation was performed at 37°C. This finding helps to explain
our previous observation that the increase in Lp(a) binding in the
presence of defensin is not accompanied by an increase in
degradation.48 This interpretation is also supported by the
finding that defensin increased the the incorporation of oleic acid
into the cellular pool of cholesterol in macrophages. Retention
of Lp(a) in the pericellular matrix induced by defensin may also
enhance its antifibrinolytic activity. Defensin may also inhibit the
binding of Lp(a) to the very low density lipoprotein
receptor52 or other receptors57 that mediate endocytosis of the lipoprotein, or defensin may otherwise interfere with mobility of these receptors in the cell membrane. On the other
hand, these experiments can also be viewed as indicating that Lp(a)
prevents the internalization of defensin, which is cytotoxic to
mammalian cells at high concentrations, thereby limiting the
potentially injurious effects of cationic proteins released from
activated neutrophils and other cell types during inflammatory reactions.79 Additional investigation will be required to
analyze the mechanism by which defensin alters Lp(a) trafficking in
greater detail and to determine the biologic importance of this pathway.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted December 8, 1998; accepted May 4, 1999.
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. HL5810.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. This article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address reprint requests to Douglas B. Cines, MD, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 513 A Stellar-Chance, 422 Curie
Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail: dcines{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Ross R:
The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: A perspective for the 1990s.
Nature
362:801, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Bostom AG, Cupples LA, Jenner JL, Ordovas JM, Seman LJ, Wilson PWF, Schaefer EJ, Castelli WP:
Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) and coronary heart disease in men aged 55 years and younger. A prospective study.
JAMA
276:544, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3.
Assmann G, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A:
Hypertriglyceridemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) are risk factors for major coronary events in middle-aged men.
Am J Cardiol
77:1179, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH:
Plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) and the risk of future stroke.
JAMA
273:1269, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5.
Williams KJ, Tabas I:
The response-to-retetention hypothesis of early atherogenesis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
15:551, 1995[Free Full Text]
6.
Schreiner PJ, Heiss G, Tyroler HA, Morrisett JD, Davis CE, Smith R:
Race and gender differences in the association of Lp(a) with carotid artery wall thickness. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
16:471, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Lin S-J, Jan K-M, Weinbaum S, Chien S:
Tranendothelial transport of low density lipoprotein in association with cell mitosis in rat aorta.
Arteriosclerosis
9:230, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8.
Schwenke DC, Carew TE:
Initiation of atherosclerotic lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits. II: Selective retention of LDL vs. selective increases in LDL permeability in susceptible sites of arteries.
Arteriosclerosis
9:908, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Nielen LB, Stender S, Jauhiainen M, Nordestgaard BG:
Preferential influx and decreased fractional loss of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesional rabbit aorta.
J Clin Invest
98:563, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Saxena U, Klein MG, Vanni TM, Goldberg IJ:
Lipoprotein lipase increases low density lipoprotein retention by subendothelial cell matrix.
J Clin Invest
89:373, 1992
11.
Syrovets T, Thillet J, Chapman J, Simmet T:
Lipoprotein(a) is a potent chemoattractant for human peripheral monocytes.
Blood
90:2027, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12.
Fruebis J, Steinberg D, Dresel HA, Carew TE:
A comparison of the antiatherogenic effects of Probucol and of a structural analogue of Probucol in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient rabbits.
J Clin Invest
94:392, 1994
13.
Liu AC, Lawn RM:
Vascular interactions of Lp(a).
Curr Opin Lipidol
5:269, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
McLean JW, Tomlinson JE, Kuang W-J, Eaton DL, Chen EY, Fless GM, Scanu AM, Lawn RM:
cDNA sequence of human apolipoprotein(a) is homologous to plasminogen.
Nature
300:132, 1987
15.
van der Hoek YY, Wittekoek ME, Beisiegel U, Kastelein JJP, Koschinsky ML:
The apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV repears which differ from the major repeat kringles are present in variably-sized isoforms.
Hum Mol Genet
2:361, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16.
Gabel BR, Koschinsky ML:
Sequences within apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV types 6-8 bind diretly to low-density lipoprotein and mediate noncovalent association of apolipoprotein(a) with apolipoprotein B-100.
Biochemistry
37:7892, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Brunner C, Kraft HG, Utermann G, Muller HJ:
Cys4057 of apolipoprotein(a) is essential for lipoprotein(a) assembly.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:11643, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18.
Miles LA, Fless GM, Levin EG, Scanu AM, Plow EF:
A potential basis for the thrombotic risks associated with lipoprotein(a).
Nature
339:301, 1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Hajjar KA, Gavish D, Breslow JL, Nachman RL:
Lipoprotein(a) modulation of endothelial cell surface fibrinolysis and its potential role in atherosclerosis.
Nature
339:303, 1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Loscalzo J, Weinfeld M, Fless GM, Scanu AM:
Lipoprotein(a), fibrin binding, and plasminogen activation.
Arteriosclerosis
10:240, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21.
Pillarisetti S, Paka L, Obunike JC, Berglund L, Goldberg IJ:
Subendothelial retention of lipoprotein(a). Evidence that reduced heparan sulfate promotes lipoprotein binding to subendothelial matrix.
J Clin Invest
100:867, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Pekelharing HLM, Kleinveld HA, Duff PFCCM, Bouma BN, van Rijn HJM:
Effect of lipoprotein (a) and LDL on plasminogen binding to extracellular matrix and on matrix-dependent plasminogen activation by tissue plasminogen activator.
Thromb Haemost
75:497, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Klezovitch O, Edelstein C, Scanu AM:
Evidence that the fibrinogen binding domain of apo(a) is outside the lysine binding site of kringle IV-10. A study involving naturally occurring lysine binding defective lipoprotein(a) phenotypes.
J Clin Invest
98:185, 1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
LoGrasso PV, Cornell-Kennon S, Boettcher BR:
Cloning, expression, and characterization of human apolipoprotein (a) kringle IV37.
J Biol Chem
269:21820, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25.
Scanu AM:
Identification of mutations in human apolipoprotein(a) kringle 4-37 from the study of the DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes: Relevance to the role of lipoprotein(a) in atherothrombosis.
Am J Cardiol
75:588, 1995
26.
Boonmark NW, Lous XJ, Yang ZJ, Schwartz K, Zhang J-L, Rubin EM, Lawn RM:
Modification of apoplipoprotein(a) lysine binding site reduces atherosclerosis in transgenic mice.
J Clin Invest
100:558, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Hughes SD, Lou XJ, Ighani S, Verstuyft J, Grainger DJ, Lawn RM, Rubin EM:
Lipoprotein(a) vascular accumulation in mice. In vivo analysis of the role of lysine binding sites using recombinant adenovirus.
J Clin Invest
100:1493, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Palabrica TM, Liu AC, Aronovitz MJ, Furie B, Lawn RM, Furie BC:
Antifibrinolytic activity of apolipoprotein(a) in vivo: Human apolipoprotein(a) transgenic mice are resistant to tissue plasminogen activator-mediated thrombolysis.
Nat Med
1:256, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Sangrar W, Gabel BG, Boffa MB, Walker JB, Hancock MA, Marcovina SM, Horrevoets AJG, Nesheim ME, Koschinsky ML:
The solution phase interaction between apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen inhibits the binding of plasminogen to a plasmin-modified fibrinogen surface.
Biochemistry
36:10353, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Liu J, Harpel PC, Gurewich V:
Fibrin-bound lipoprotein(a) promotes plasminogen binding but inhibits fibrin degradation by plasmin.
Biochemistry
33:2554, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Grainger DJ, Kemp PR, Liu AC, Lawn RM, Metcalfe JC:
Activation of transforming growth factor- is inhibited in transgenic apolipoprotein(a) mice.
Nature
370:460, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Grainger DJ, Kemp PR, Metcalfe JC, Liu AC, Lawn RM, Williams NR, Grace AA, Schofield PM, Chauhan A:
The serum concentration of active transforming growth factor- is severely depressed in advanced atherosclerosis.
Nat Med
1:74, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Ridker PM:
Inflammation, infection, and cardiovascular risk. How good is the clinical evidence?
Circulation
97:1671, 1997[Free Full Text]
34.
Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW, Cushman M, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH:
Relationship of C-reactive protein to risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion Project.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
17:1121, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35.
Smith JD, Trogan E, Ginsberg M, Grigaux C, Tian J, Miyata M:
Decreased atherosclerosis in mice deficient in both macrophage colony-stimulating factor (op) and apolipoprotein E.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:8264, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36.
Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH:
Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men.
N Engl J Med
336:973, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37.
Weijemberg MP, Feskens EJM, Kromhout D:
White blood cell count and the risk of coronary heart disease and all cause mortality in elderly men.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
16:499, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38.
Zalokar JB, Richard JL, Claude JR:
Leukocyte count, smoking and myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med
304:465, 1981[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Ganz T:
Extracellular release of antimicrobial defensins by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
Infect Immun
55:568, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40.
Harwig SS, Ganz T, Lehrer RI:
Neutrophil defensins: Purification, characterization, and antimicrobial testing.
Methods Enzymol
236:160, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Panyutich AV, Panyutich EA, Krapivin VA, Baturevich EA, Ganz T:
Plasma defensin concentrations are elevated in patients with sepsis or bacterial meningitis.
J Lab Clin Med
122:202, 1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
IhI T, Nakazato N, Matsukura S:
Elevated concentrations of human neutrophil peptides in plasma, blood, and body fluids from patients with infection.
Clin Infect Dis
25:1134, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Selsted ME, Harwig SSL, Ganz T, Schilling JW, Lehrer RI:
Primary structures of three human neutrophil defensins.
J Clin Invest
76:1436, 1985
44.
Hill CP, Yee J, Selsted ME, Eisenberg D:
Crystal structure of defensin HNP-3, an amphiphilic dimer: Mechanisms of membrane permeabilization.
Science
251:1481, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45.
Boren J, Olin K, Lee I, Chait A, Wight TM, Innerarity TL:
Identification of the principal proteoglycan binding site in LDL. A single point mutation in apo-B100 severely affects proteoglycan interaction without affecting LDL receptor binding.
J Clin Invest
101:2658, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Fass D, Blacklow S, Kim PS, Berger JM:
Molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolaemia from structure of LDL receptor molecule.
Nature
388:691, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Barnathan ES, Reghunath PN, Tomaszewski JE, Ganz T, Cines DB, Higazi AA:
Immunohistochemical localization of defensin in human coronary vessels.
Am J Pathol
150:1009, 1997[Abstract]
48.
Higazi AA-R, Lavi E, Bdeir K, Ulrich AM, Jamieson DG, Rader DJ, Usher DC, Kane W, Ganz T, Cines DB:
Defensin stimulates the binding of Lp(a) to human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells.
Blood
89:4290, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49.
Higazi AA-R, Barghouti II, Abu-Much R:
Identification of an inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis in human neutrophils.
J Biol Chem
270:9472, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50.
Higazi AA-R, Ganz T, Kariko K, Cines DB:
Defensin modulates tPA and plasminogen binding to fibrin and endothelial cells.
J Biol Chem
271:17650, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51.
Rader DJ, Mann WA, Cain W, Kraft H-G, Usher D, Zech LA, Hoeg JM, Davignon J, Lupien P, Grossman M, Wilson JM, Brewer HB Jr:
The low density lipoprotein receptor is not required for normal catabolism of Lp(a) in humans.
J Clin Invest
95:1403, 1995
52.
Argraves KM, Kozarsky KF, Fallon JT, Harpel PC, Strickland DK:
The atherogenic lipoprotein Lp(a) is internalized and degraded in a process mediates by the VLDL receptor.
J Clin Invest
100:2170, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Panyutich AV, Voitenok NN, Lehrer RI, Ganz T:
An enzyme immunoassay for human defensin.
J Immmunol Methods
141:149, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
54.
Rader DJ, Cain W, Zech L, Usher D, Brewer HB:
The inverse association of plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations with apolipoprotein(a) isoform size is not due to differences in Lp(a) catabolism but to differences in production rate.
J Clin Invest
93:2758, 1994
55.
Edelstein CJ, Italia J, Klezovitch O, Scanu A:
Functional and metabolic differences between elastase-generated fragments of human lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a).
J Lipid Res
37:1786, 1996[Abstract]
56.
Bilheimer DW, Eisenberg S, Levy RI:
The metabolism of very low density lipoprotein proteins. I. Preliminary in vitro and in vivo observations.
Biochem Biophys Acta
260:212, 1972[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Liu SY, Choy S, Dembinski TC, Hatch GM, Mymin D, Shen GX, Angel A, Choy PC, Man RYK:
Alteration of lysophosphatidylcholine content in low density lipoprotein after oxidative modification: Relationship to endothelium dependent relaxation.
Cardiovasc Res
28:1476, 1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Harats D, Dabach D, Hollander G, Ben-Naim M, Schwartz R, Berry EM, Stein O, Stein Y:
Fish oil ingestion in smokers and nonsmokers enhances peroxidation of plasma lipoproteins.
Atherosclerosis
90:127, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Koschinsky ML, Tomlinson JE, Zioncheck TF, Schwartz K, Eaton DL, Lawn RM:
Apolipoprotein(a): Expression and characterization of a recombinant form of the protein in mammalian cells.
Biochemistry
30:5044, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
60.
Cines DB, Lyss AP, Reeber MJ, Bina M, DeHoratius R:
Presence of complement-fixing anti-endothelial cell antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Clin Invest
73:611, 1984
61.
Esko JD:
Genetic analysis of proteoglycan structure, function and metabolism.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
3:805, 1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
62.
Gospodarowicz D, Delgado D, Vlodavsky I:
Permissive effect of the extracellular matrix on cell proliferation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
77:4094, 1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63.
Myszka DG:
Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors.
Curr Opin Biotechnol
8:50, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
64.
Johnsson B, Lofas S, Lindquist G, Edstrom A, Muller-Hillgran R-M, Hanson A:
Comparison of methods for immobilization to carboxymethyl dextran sensor surfaces by analysis of the specific activity of monoclonal antibodies.
J Mol Recognition
8:125, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
65.
Stenberg E, Prrsson B, Roos H, Urbaniczky C:
Quantitative determination of surface concentration of protein with surface plasmon resonance by using radiolabeled proteins.
Colloid Interface Sci
143:513, 1991
66.
Karlsson R, Roos H, Fagerstam L, Mattson L:
Kinetic analysis of monoclonal antibody-antigen interactions with a new biosensor based analytic system.
Methods Companion Methods Enzymol
6:99, 1994
67.
Veklich YI, Gorkun OV, Medved LV, Niewenhuizen W, Wiesel JW:
Carboxyterminal portions of the alpha chains of fibrinogen and fibrin: Localization by electron microscopy and the effects of isolated alpha-C fragments on polymerization.
J Biol Chem
268:13577, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68.
Weisel JW, Stauffacher CV, Bullit E, Cohen C:
A model for fibrinogen: Domains and sequence.
Science
230:1388, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69.
Poon M, Zhang Z, Dunsky KG, Taubman MB, Harpel PC:
Apolipoprotein(a) induces monocyte chemotactic activity in human vascular endothelial cells.
Circulation
96:2514, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70.
Rader DJ, Hoeg JM, Brewer HB Jr:
Quantitation of plasma apolipoproteins in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.
Ann Intern Med
120:1012, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71.
Soong LB, Ganz T, Ellison A, Caughey GH:
Purification and characterization of defensins from cystic fibrosis sputum.
Inflamm Res
46:98, 1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
72.
Ashitani J, Mukae H, Nakazato M, Taniguchi H, Ogawa K, Kohno S, Matsukura S:
Elevated pleural fluid levels of defensins in patients with empyema.
Chest
113:788, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73.
Liu J-N, Kung W, Harpel PC, Gurewich V:
Demonstration of covalent binding of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to fibrin and endothelial cells.
Biochemistry
37:3949, 1998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
74.
White SH, Wimley WC, Selsted ME:
Structure, function and membrane integration of defensins.
Curr Opin Struct Biol
5:521, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
75.
Van der Hoek Y, Sangarar W, Cote GP, Kastelein JP, Koschinsky M:
Binding of recombinant apo(a) to extracellular matrix proteins.
Arterioscler Thromb
14:1792, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
76.
Salonen E-M, Jauhiaianen M, Zardi L, Vaheri A, Ehnholm C:
Lipoprotein (a) binds to fibronectin and has serine proteinase activity capable of cleaving it.
EMBO J
8:4035, 1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
77.
Ugarova TP, Zamarron C, Veklich Y, Bowditch RD, Ginsburg MH, Weisel JW, Plow EF:
Conformational transitions in the cell binding domain of fibronectin.
Biochemistry
34:4457, 1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
78.
Lichtenstein A:
Mechanism of mammalian cell lysis mediated by peptide defensins. Evidence for an initial alteration of the plasma membrane.
J Clin Invest
88:93, 1991
79.
Okrent DG, Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T:
Direct cytotoxicity of polymorphonuclear leukocyte granule proteins to human lung-derived cells and endothelial cells.
Am Rev Resp Dis
141:179, 1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Dugan, M. S. Maginnis, J. A. Jordan, M. L. Gasparovic, K. Manley, R. Page, G. Williams, E. Porter, B. A. O'Hara, and W. J. Atwood
Human {alpha}-Defensins Inhibit BK Virus Infection by Aggregating Virions and Blocking Binding to Host Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 7, 2008;
283(45):
31125 - 31132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Quinn, M. Henriques, T. Parker, A. S. Slutsky, and H. Zhang
Human neutrophil peptides: a novel potential mediator of inflammatory cardiovascular diseases
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
H1817 - H1824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Xu, Y.-s. Wang, W.-b. Pan, B. Xiao, Y.-j. Wen, X.-c. Chen, L.-j. Chen, H.-x. Deng, J. You, B. Kan, et al.
Human {alpha}-defensin-1 inhibits growth of human lung adenocarcinoma xenograft in nude mice
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
June 1, 2008;
7(6):
1588 - 1597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Joseph, L. Tarnow, A. S. Astrup, T. K. Hansen, H.-H. Parving, A. Flyvbjerg, and J. Frystyk
Plasma {alpha}-Defensin Is Associated with Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetic Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2008;
93(4):
1470 - 1475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Economopoulou, K. Bdeir, D. B. Cines, F. Fogt, Y. Bdeir, J. Lubkowski, W. Lu, K. T. Preissner, H.-P. Hammes, and T. Chavakis
Inhibition of pathologic retinal neovascularization by {alpha}-defensins
Blood,
December 1, 2005;
106(12):
3831 - 3838.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bellocchio, S. Moretti, K. Perruccio, F. Fallarino, S. Bozza, C. Montagnoli, P. Mosci, G. B. Lipford, L. Pitzurra, and L. Romani
TLRs Govern Neutrophil Activity in Aspergillosis
J. Immunol.,
December 15, 2004;
173(12):
7406 - 7415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gil-Lamaignere, E. Roilides, C. A. Lyman, M. Simitsopoulou, T. Stergiopoulou, A. Maloukou, and T. J. Walsh
Human Phagocytic Cell Responses to Scedosporium apiospermum (Pseudallescheria boydii): Variable Susceptibility to Oxidative Injury
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2003;
71(11):
6472 - 6478.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nassar, S.'e. Akkawi, R. Bar-Shavit, A. Haj-Yehia, K. Bdeir, A.-B. Al-Mehdi, M. Tarshis, and A. A.-R. Higazi
Human alpha -defensin regulates smooth muscle cell contraction: a role for low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor
Blood,
December 1, 2002;
100(12):
4026 - 4032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Sachais, A. Kuo, T. Nassar, J. Morgan, K. Kariko, K. J. Williams, M. Feldman, M. Aviram, N. Shah, L. Jarett, et al.
Platelet factor 4 binds to low-density lipoprotein receptors and disrupts the endocytic itinerary, resulting in retention of low-density lipoprotein on the cell surface
Blood,
May 15, 2002;
99(10):
3613 - 3622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A.-R. Higazi, T. Nassar, T. Ganz, D. J. Rader, R. Udassin, K. Bdeir, E. Hiss, B. S. Sachais, K. J. Williams, E. Leitersdorf, et al.
The alpha -defensins stimulate proteoglycan-dependent catabolism of low-density lipoprotein by vascular cells: a new class of inflammatory apolipoprotein and a possible contributor to atherogenesis
Blood,
August 15, 2000;
96(4):
1393 - 1398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Yang, Q. Chen, O. Chertov, and J. J. Oppenheim
Human neutrophil defensins selectively chemoattract naive T and immature dendritic cells
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
July 1, 2000;
68(1):
9 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|