Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Red Cells
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, Vol. 94 No. 6 (September 15), 1999: pp. 2121-2127

CD36 Peptides That Block Cytoadherence Define the CD36 Binding Region for Plasmodium falciparum-Infected Erythrocytes

By Dror I. Baruch, Xin C. Ma, Brittan Pasloske, Russell J. Howard, and Louis H. Miller

From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Affymax Research Institute, Santa Clara, CA.


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mature Plasmodium falciparum parasitized erythrocytes (PE) sequester from the circulation by adhering to microvascular endothelial cells. PE sequestration contributes directly to the virulence and severe pathology of falciparum malaria. The scavenger receptor, CD36, is a major host receptor for PE adherence. PE adhesion to CD36 is mediated by the malarial variant antigen, P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), and particularly by its cysteine-rich interdomain region 1 (CIDR-1). Several peptides from the extended immunodominant domain of CD36 (residues 139-184), including CD36 139-155, CD36 145-171, CD36 146-164, and CD36 156-184 interfered with the CD36-PfEMP1 interaction. Each of these peptides affected binding at the low micromolar range in 2 independent assays. Two peptides, CD36 145-171 and CD36 156-184, specifically blocked PE adhesion to CD36 without affecting binding to the host receptor intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Moreover, an adhesion blocking peptide from the ICAM-1 sequence inhibits the PfEMP1-ICAM-1 interaction without affecting adhesion to CD36. These results confirm earlier observations that PfEMP1 is also a receptor for ICAM-1. Thus, the region 139-184 and particularly the 146-164 or the 145-171 regions of CD36 form the adhesion region for P. falciparum PE. Adherence blocking peptides from this region may be useful for modeling the PE/PfEMP1 interaction with CD36 and for development of potential anti-adhesion therapeutics.
© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SEQUESTRATION OF MATURE stage parasitized erythrocytes (PE) is central for the survival and the pathology of P. falciparum parasites.1-4 Adherence of P. falciparum PE to endothelial cells in various blood vessels can result in local microvascular occlusion contributing directly to the pathology of P. falciparum malaria.1,5,6

Adherence of PE to endothelial cells is mediated by the binding of the infected erythrocyte to host receptors expressed on endothelial cells including CD36, thrombospondin (TSP), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and chondroitin sulfate A.2,7-10 Other molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin, and CD31 mediate adherence of a minority of P. falciparum parasites.11-13 CD36 may play a predominant role in PE adherence, as almost all adherence positive P. falciparum strains and isolates bind to CD36.13 There is a significant correlation between PE sequestration and expression of CD36 (and ICAM-1) in various organs and vascular endothelium.5,14 Under flow conditions, which mimic in vivo blood flow, CD36 supports stable stationary adherence of PE, while ICAM-1 mediates PE rolling and adherence to TSP appears to be unstable.15 Recently, a recombinant protein from P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), named rC1-2, located in the first cysteine-rich interdomain region (CIDR-1) immediately after the first Duffy binding-like (DBL) domain was shown to mediate PE adherence to CD36.16,17

CD36 is an 88-kD glycoprotein scavenger receptor expressed on the surface of various cells including platelets, adipocytes, monocytes, macrophages, leukocytes, megakaryocytes, erythroblasts, melanoma cells, and endothelial cells.5,18,19 Several CD36 genes cloned from different organisms display high sequence conservation.20 In the last years, several other proteins were found to have sequence and structural homology with CD36. This includes the type B scavenger receptor SR-BI/CLA-1, the lysosomal protein LIMP II, 2 Drosophila proteins, and a Caenorhabditis elegans protein, all members of the CD36 gene family.20-22 CD36 is implicated in uptake of oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL), long chain fatty acids, anionic phospholipids, phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils, and in signal transduction.23-30 CD36 can interact with a wide range of different molecules including ox-LDL, the extracellular matrix proteins collagen and TSP, and the malarial protein PfEMP1.17,20,27,29,31-35

Several anti-CD36 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) (8A6, OKM5, FA6-152, and 10/5) that block binding of ox-LDL and recognition of apoptotic neutrophils react with the CD36 immunodominant domain, defined by residues 155-183.33,34,36 These MoAbs also efficiently block adhesion of PE to human CD36.8 However, it was recently shown37 that the binding domain for ox-LDL resides elsewhere (residues 28-93) on CD36. Thus, these MoAbs block a function that resides outside the immunodominant region (155-183) of CD36, either by steric hindrance or by changing the conformation of CD36 required for binding. The binding domains for collagen and TSP were ascribed to the 415-427 and the 93-120 regions, respectively.31,32 Residues 139-155, located just before the immunodominant domain, were shown to induce a conformational change in TSP, which leads to higher affinity interaction between TSP and the 93-110 region of CD36.27,38

The inhibitory effect of MoAbs specific for the 155-184 region suggests that the binding domains for the inhibitory MoAbs and for PE overlap. However, PE bind to both human and mouse CD36, although only the human CD36 is recognized by the inhibitory MoAbs.39,40 This significant difference indicates that inhibitory MoAbs and infected erythrocytes recognize different residues of the CD36 multifunctional domain or that residues outside this region contribute significantly to the PE-CD36 interaction.

To study the region(s) of CD36 involved in binding of PfEMP1 and PE adhesion, we made a set of peptides from different regions of CD36 and tested their ability to inhibit the PfEMP1-CD36 interaction and to block PE adhesion.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Parasites.   Malayan Camp (MC R+) and the FCR3-C5 P. falciparum strains adhere to the host receptors CD36 and TSP, but not ICAM-1. The ItG2-ICAM strain and clone A4ultra adhered to all 3 host receptors.16,35

Peptides.   CD36-derived peptides CD36 62-75 (residues 62-75), CD36 233-250 (residue 238 (Lys) was replaced by a Tyr residue), CD36 358-370, CD36 397-409, and CD36 413-426 (with an additional Tyr residue) were custom synthesized by Bio-Synthesis Inc, (Lewisville, TX). Peptides CD36 139-155 and CD36 93-110 were synthesized both by Neuros Corp (San Jose, CA) and by Affymax Research Institute (Santa Clara, CA). Peptides CD36 93-110C and CD36 C139-155 with additional terminal cysteines at the carboxyl- or amino-terminus, respectively, were purchased from Bachem California (Torrance, CA) and also synthesized at Affymax Research Institute. Peptides CD36 139-149, CD36 142-152, and CD36 146-155 were synthesized by SynPeP Corporation (Dublin, CA). A scrambled version of the CD36 139-155 was also synthesized, but was largely insoluble even at 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Peptides CD36 145-171, CD36 146-164, and CD36 156-184 were synthesized by the support facility, NIAID, NIH. The ICAM 15-20 was synthesized at Affymax Research Institute. The amino acid sequences of the peptides are described in Table 1. All peptides were synthesized by the Fmoc method, purified to homogeneity by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and confirmed structurally by mass spectrometry. Peptide concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Soluble receptors.   Soluble CD36 extracellular domain was obtained in the form of harvest supernatant (approximately 1 to 5 µg/mL) after phospholipase C treatment of cultured cells as described before.35 Soluble ICAM-1 extracellular domain carrying the Protein A Ig binding domain (ZZ-ICAM) was a gift from Dr Andrew Hutchinson (Glaxo-Wellcome, Stevange, UK).

Antibodies.   Mouse MoAb 179 (Affymax Research Institute) recognizes an epitope sequence incorporated into the carboxy terminus of CD36. Mouse MoAb 141 (Affymax Research Institute) recognizes GST.17,35 Rabbit IgG was purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Labs (West Grove, PA).

Affinity purification of surface radiolabeled PfEMP1.   PE were surface radioiodinated and sequentially extracted with triton X-100 (TX100) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as described.35 Inhibition of binding of PfEMP1 to sCD36 or ICAM-1 was as described.35 Briefly, 5 to 10 µL of PE SDS extracts were reconstituted in 1 mL of 25 mmol/L HEPES, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) 0.5% TX100 in RPMI-1640 (BM-T, binding medium containing TX100) at pH 6.7 for CD36 and pH 7.3 for ICAM-1. Peptides dissolved in DMSO were added to the appropriate concentration. DMSO was added to give a final concentration of 5% DMSO. The reconstituted SDS extracts were incubated, 16 hours at 4°C, with CD36-derived peptides or, 1 hour at 21°C, with peptide ICAM-1 15-20 followed by incubation, 3 hours at 21°C, with immobilized receptor, and processed as described.35

Affinity-purification of CD36 with immobilized recombinant fragments of PfEMP1.   Affinity-purification of CD36 with immobilized rC1-2 [1-179] (GST-fusion) was described earlier.17 Briefly, 25 µL of GammaBind Plus Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech Inc, Piscataway, NJ) were precoated, 90 minutes 21°C, with 10 µg of MoAb 141 (anti-GST), then incubated with 2.5 µg of rC1-2 [1-179]. The coated beads were incubated 60 minutes at 21°C, with 450 µL of BM containing peptides and 5% DMSO final concentration. A total of 50 µLl of soluble CD36 (0.5 to 1 µg/mL) was added and incubated 2 hours at 21°C. The beads were washed twice with BM, once with BM without BSA, and solubilized in 40 µL of SDS sample buffer. One to 2.5-µL samples were fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), immunoblotted, and probed with a 1:10,000 dilution of biotinylated MoAb 179 as primary antibody followed with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson Immunoresearch Inc) at 1:5,000 dilution.

Densitometry.   Autoradiographs were scanned and individual bands were quantified after background subtraction using the NIH Image 1.61 standard program.

Cytoadherence microassay.   Adherence of PE to immobilized proteins was performed by standard methods.17,41,42 For ICAM-1 binding, plates were spotted with 50 µg/mL of rabbit IgG and incubated with 25 µg/mL of ZZ-ICAM. Blockade of PE adherence by the different peptides was tested by preincubating, 1 hour at 37°C, PE in BM media (0.2% BSA) containing peptides and 1% DMSO final concentration. PE were added to the spotted receptors, incubated, 1 hour at 37°C, washed 4 times with BM, fixed, stained, and counted.42


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CD36 and ICAM-1-derived peptides inhibit the binding of PfEMP1 to CD36 and ICAM-1, respectively.   A panel of CD36 peptides27 (Fig 1) were assayed at 500 µmol/L (300 µmol/L for peptide CD36 233-150) for their effects on the binding of 125I-PfEMP1 from the Malayan Camp (MC R+) strain (Fig 1A) and clone FCR3-C5 (Fig 1B) to CD36. Addition of DMSO (5%) had very little effect (Fig 1B), but in some of the assays, a 50% reduction in binding was observed (Fig 1A). Therefore, in each assay, the effect of each peptide was measured and compared with the binding of the DMSO control (100% binding). Peptides CD36 139-155, CD36 62-75, and CD36 233-250 blocked the CD36-PfEMP1 interaction by more than 50% for MC and 40% for FCR3-C5 (Fig 1). Peptide CD36 139-155 was the most active, affecting binding by 70% to 82%. Other peptides either increased binding or had very limited effect (up to 20%). The different effects of peptides on specific PfEMP1 bands is attributed to the variant sequence of different PfEMP1 molecules.17,41,43 Three partial peptides from the 139-155 region (CD36 139-149, CD36 142-152, and CD36 145-155, Table 1) had no effect on binding (unpublished data).


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. CD36 peptides inhibit the binding of 125I-PfEMP1 to CD36. TX100 insoluble material from surface iodinated PE was extracted with SDS (SDS extract) and reconstituted in RPMI containing 1% BSA and 0.5% TX100.35 Peptides dissolved in DMSO were added to the sample, incubated overnight, and allowed to bind to CD36-coated beads for 3 hours. The beads were washed 3 times and processed for SDS-PAGE as before.35 Peptides were tested at 500 µmol/L, except for peptide CD36 233-255, which was tested at 300 µmol/L. All samples except No DMSO, had a 5% final concentration of DMSO. The percent inhibition of binding from the DMSO control is indicated at the bottom of the figure. Negative numbers means higher binding than the DMSO control. (A) MC R+ SDS extract; (B) FCR3-C5 SDS extract. The percent inhibition of peptide CD36 358-370 with FCR3-C5 extract was calculated without the specific background subtraction.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Amino Acid Sequence of the Different CD36 and ICAM-1 Peptides

Dose response assays with the 3 active peptides demonstrated that peptides CD36 62-75 and CD36 233-250 were active only at high concentrations (250 to 300 µmol/L) and actually increased binding at concentrations of 100 µmol/L or lower (Fig 2A). Thus, the activity of these peptides may not be highly specific for the PfEMP1-CD36 interaction. On the other hand, peptide CD36 139-155 had an apparent 50% inhibition (IC50) of approx  5 µmol/L (Fig 2A and Table 2). The peptide had no effect on the binding of ItG-ICAM PfEMP1 to ICAM-1 (not shown), indicating that its blocking activity is specific for the PfEMP1-CD36 interaction. To verify these results, 3 preparations of peptide CD36 139-155 derived from independent sources were assayed and found to consistently block binding of PfEMP1 to CD36.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of 125I-PfEMP1 to CD36 and ICAM-1. (A) Inhibition of binding to CD36 using MC R+ SDS extract was performed as in Fig 1. Peptide concentration is given in µmol/L. The concentration of peptide CD36 397-409 was 500 µmol/L. (B) Inhibition of binding to ICAM-1 using ItG-ICAM SDS extract was performed as in Fig 1, except that the peptides were preincubated with the extract for 1 hour at room temperature. Peptide concentration is given in µmol/L and all samples (except No DMSO) had a 5% final concentration of DMSO. The percent inhibition of binding from the DMSO control is indicated at the bottom of the figure.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Approximate IC50 Values of Peptides Inhibiting the Interaction of PfEMP1 or Infected Erythrocytes With CD36 or ICAM-1

Peptide ICAM-1 15-20 blocks adherence of intact PE (ItG2-ICAM strain) to ICAM-1.44 This peptide also blocked the binding of ItG2-ICAM PfEMP1 to ICAM-1 at a concentration of 100 µmol/L or higher with an IC50 of about 200 µmol/L (Fig 2B). The peptide did not block the interaction of MC PfEMP1 with CD36 (not shown). These results are consistent with independent binding domains for CD36 and ICAM-1 on PfEMP1.35,45

CD36-derived peptides block binding of rC1-2 [1-179] to CD36.   A region from the CIDR-1 domain of MC-PfEMP1, represented by the recombinant protein rC1-2, was recently demonstrated to bind CD36 and to mediate PE adherence to CD36.17 Peptide CD36 139-155 blocked the interaction of CD36 with rC1-2 [1-179] with apparent IC50 of about 2 µmol/L (Fig 3 and Table 2). At 50 µmol/L, peptides CD36 62-75 and CD36 233-250, which blocked binding of PfEMP1 to CD36 at high concentrations (Fig 2), had little (23.1%) to no effect (6.3%) on this interaction compared with 78% to 92% inhibition with peptide CD36 139-155 (Fig 3). Peptides CD36 139-149 and CD36 142-152, but not peptide CD36-145-155, blocked the binding of CD36 to rC1-2 (1-179) (Fig 3A). Some of this activity may be attributed to the highly hydrophobic nature of the first 2 peptides. Also, these assays are not truly quantitative, but demonstrate the range of effective inhibition of binding of each peptide.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. CD36 peptides inhibit the binding of rC1-2 [1-179] to CD36. Peptides were prepared in 0.45 mL of binding media pH 6.7 containing 1% BSA and 5% DMSO and microfuged for 5 minutes before addition to the coated beads to remove insoluble peptide material. Peptides were incubated, 1 hour at room temperature with beads coated with rC1-2 [1-179] before addition of sCD36. After 3 hours incubation, the beads were washed and solubilized for SDS-PAGE.17 The binding of CD36 was assayed by Western blot using biotinylated MoAb 179 recognizing a tag incorporated to the sequence of sCD36.17 All samples (except No DMSO) had a 5% final concentration of DMSO. Percent inhibition of binding (from the DMSO control) is indicated at the bottom of the figure. Negative numbers means higher binding than the DMSO control. (A) Various CD36-derived peptides tested at 50 µmol/L. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of CD36 to rC1-2 [1-179]. Peptides concentration is in µmol/L. Peptide CD36 139-155 was largely insoluble at 100 µmol/L and peptide CD36 146-164 was only partially soluble at 50 µmol/L. In both cases, most of the peptide was removed by the centrifugation step resulting in low to no inhibition (data not shown).

Earlier studies suggested that the adherence blocking MoAb OKM5 recognizes the 139-155 region of CD36.27 Human-mouse hybrids of CD36 demonstrated that OKM5, 15.2, and other adherence blocking MoAbs actually recognize the adjacent region (155-183) of CD36.39 Therefore, additional peptides from the 155-184 and 139-184 regions were synthesized (see Table 1) and measured for their effect on binding of CD36 to the rC1-2 [1-179] GST fusion protein (Fig 3 and Table 2). Peptides CD36 146-164 and CD36 156-184 inhibited the CD36-rC1-2 [1-179] interaction at 50 µmol/L (Fig 3A) and were active even at a concentration of 0.1 µmol/L (Fig 3B). Peptide CD36 156-184 was also active at 0.01 µmol/L (only partial inhibition), while peptide CD36 146-164 appeared to be inactive at this concentration (data not shown). Peptide CD36 145-171 inhibition profile for the rC1-2 [1-179]-CD36 interaction was similar to that of CD36 146-164 (not shown). Thus, peptides from both regions, CD36 139-155 and CD36 156-184, represent sites of CD36, which interact with the PE receptor, PfEMP1.

The inhibitory effect of different peptides is influenced by their solubility.   The relative solubility of the various peptides was determined by the appearance and the size of a precipitate after centrifugation. Although this does not give an accurate measurement of solubility and of the actual concentration of soluble material, it gives a good indication if a peptide is only partially or completely soluble at the conditions of each assay. Peptide CD36 156-184 was soluble even at high concentrations (>250 µmol/L). However, several of the active peptides, mainly CD36 139-155 and CD36 146-164, were not completely soluble at concentrations higher than 50 to 100 µmol/L, as large precipitates were observed and removed by centrifugation. This observation explains the reduction of inhibition associated with high peptide concentrations for some peptides (D. Baruch, unpublished observations). Peptide CD36 145-171 solubility was higher than CD36 146-164, but not as good as CD36 155-184. Thus, at the high µmol/L range, the actual final concentration of the peptide in the assay solution may be lower, depending on the relative solubility of the peptide in the assay solution. This is particularly important in blockade of adherence assays. In this assay, the amount of DMSO must be restricted to 1% (final) compared with 5% DMSO or 5% DMSO/0.5%TX100/0.1% SDS used in the affinity purification assays. Moreover, significantly higher peptide concentration is needed to block the interaction of the multivalant PE with CD36. Thus, marginally soluble peptides may not be soluble at the concentration required for blockade of PE adherence, although they may effectively block the PfEMP1-CD36 interaction. However, differences in the IC50 (Table 2), measured at the low µmol/L range are not affected by peptide solubility and represent true differences in the inhibitory activity of the different peptides.

CD36 and ICAM-1-derived peptides block PE adhesion.   Peptide CD36 156-184 at a concentration of 100 µmol/L blocked PE adhesion to CD36 of strain A4ultra by more than 70% (Fig 4A), with an IC50 of about 25 µmol/L (Fig 4C and Table 2). Another peptide, CD36 145-171, with higher solubility than CD36 146-164 (but lower than CD36 156-184) blocked PE adhesion to CD36 with an IC50 of about 86 µmol/L (Fig 4C and Table 2). Other peptides tested, CD36 413-426, CD36 139-155, CD36 146-164, and ICAM-1 15-20 had no inhibitory effect on PE binding (Fig 4A). However, peptides CD36 139-155 and CD36 146-164 were only partially soluble at the 50 to 100 µmol/L concentration and failed to reach the high concentration necessary to block PE adhesion. This is particularly true for peptide CD36 139-155 that had much higher IC50 than the other peptides (Fig 3B and Table 2). The higher binding found with some of the peptides is attributed to the combined effect of both peptide and DMSO resulting in elevated adherence of PE or higher binding of PfEMP1 (see Figs 1 through 4 and D. Baruch, unpublished observation). In each case, the percent inhibition of adherence was calculated from the DMSO control (no peptide).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Blockade of PE adherence to immobilized CD36 and ICAM-1. PE from clone A4ultra were incubated for 1 hour in binding media containing the appropriate peptide and final concentration of 1% DMSO, then added to the spotted receptor for 1 hour and processed as described in Materials and Methods. Results are given as percent binding from the control (no peptide). (A) Blockade of adhesion to CD36 tested at 100 µmol/L. MoAb 8A6 was tested at 10 µg/mL. (B) Blockade of adherence to ICAM-1. Peptide CD36 156-184 was tested at 100 µmol/L, peptide ICAM-1 15-20 was tested at 100 and 500 µmol/L. (C) Concentration-dependent blockade of adherence to CD36. Peptide inhibition was tested at 1 to 100 µmol/L range as described in (A).

Peptide CD36 156-184 had no inhibitory effect on PE adherence to ICAM-1 (Fig 4B). The ICAM-1 15-20 peptide completely blocked adhesion to ICAM-1 at 500 µmol/L and more than 60% at 100 µmol/L (Fig 4B and Table 2) with an IC50 of about 97 µmol/L, but had no effect on PE adhesion to CD36 (Fig 4A). These results demonstrate that the activity of the CD36 peptides and in particular CD36 156-184 is specific for PE adherence to CD36 and that the ICAM-1 15-20 peptide was specific for PE adherence to ICAM-1 (Fig 4).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Binding to CD36 plays a significant role in adherence of P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes.2,13-15 Antibodies that are able to block this interaction, such as 8A6, 10/5, and OKM5, recognize a single immunodominant domain (155-183) in human CD36.39,40 However, the inhibitory MoAbs do not bind to mouse CD36 while PE do.40 The MoAbs also block the binding of ox-LDL residing well outside the immunodominant domain,37 indicating a possible conformational change in CD36 mediated by Ab binding. This suggests that the regions of CD36 recognized by PE and the inhibitory MoAbs may not be the same. Therefore, we tested peptides from the sequence of CD36 to identify the PE binding domain of CD36.

Three independent assays were applied to assess the ability of different peptides to block the PE or PfEMP1 interaction with CD36. We identified several peptides CD36 139-155, CD36 146-171, CD36 145-171, and CD36 156-184 to have blocking effect on binding to CD36 in 2 different assays. These peptides had no effect on binding to the host receptor ICAM-1, indicating that the inhibition is specific for CD36. These peptides derive from the extended immunodominant region of CD36 (139-183), as residues 139-155 are believed to contribute to the binding of the OKM5 and similar antibodies to CD36.27,39

Several other peptides CD36 62-75, CD36 233-250, CD36 139-149, and CD36 142-152 also gave partial blocking activity (Figs 1 and 3). However, these peptides were positive for inhibition only in 1 of the 3 assays used and were active at much higher concentrations (IC50 >200 µmol/L) than the CD36 139-184 peptides (IC50 <5 µmol/L). In addition, none of these peptides blocked PE adhesion. Peptides CD36 97-110 and CD36 8-21 reported by Asch et al46 to block PE adhesion did not show any inhibition in our assays (CD36 97-110) or are lacking (CD36 8-21) from the soluble CD36 used here. Nevertheless, the possibility that the above residues contribute to the PE interaction with CD36 cannot be excluded.

Attempts to define the minimal binding domain were partially successful. Both peptides CD36 145-171 and CD36 146-164 were active, although only CD36 145-171 was able to block PE adhesion. Our attempts were complicated by the lack of solubility of the different peptides. Apart from CD36 156-184 and ICAM-1 15-20, which were readily soluble in aqueous solution, other peptides were much less soluble and could not be properly tested at high concentrations required for efficient inhibition. This is especially true in the PE blockade of adhesion assay where the DMSO content is restricted to maximum of 1% (compare with 5% in other assays). However, it is clear that although peptide CD36 139-155 was active, it displayed a much lower inhibition than the other 3 peptides (Table 2). Thus, we submit that the CD36 binding domain for PfEMP1 and infected erythrocyte is located at residues 139-184 of CD36 and in particular residues 145-171 or residues 146-164.

The PfEMP1 region corresponding to the rC1-2 [1-179] fragment of the CIDR-1 domain display significant variability among var genes including those originated from CD36 adherent parasites.17 Variation in the sequence of the CD36 binding domain, CIDR-1, and in binding domains for other host receptors, may result in qualitative and quantitative differences in adhesion of individual PE expressing PfEMP1 variants. These variations are expected to play a significant role governing the specific organ (eg, lung, heart, brain, placenta etc) and site of sequestration of individual PE. For example, PE sequestered in placenta binds to chondroitin sulfate A, but not to CD36.47 Although alternative recognition of residues of CD36 is possible, it appears that infected erythrocytes recognize the same CD36 domain, regardless of their variant sequences. The recombinant protein rC1-2 [1-179] blocked adhesion of all antigenically variant CD36-adherent PE tested.17 Also, the adhesion of various P. falciparum strains is blocked by Abs to the immunodominant domain of CD36.8,17,40 The peptides tested here provide additional support for a single adhesion region. These peptides inhibit the PE/PfEMP1 interaction with CD36 of 3 different strains, known to express different CIDR-1 sequences.16,17

Peptides from the CD36 139-184 region may have an anti-adhesion therapeutic potential. However, the high concentration needed for effective blockade of adherence and the relative low solubility of these peptides must be improved significantly for any possible anti-adherence therapeutics. In addition, several functions of CD36 may reside in this region or are influenced by Ab binding to this region, including binding of Ox-LDL, binding of fatty acids, phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils, and signal transduction properties.20,25,33,34,37 Adhesion of PE to this region may cause local inhibition or activation of some of the CD36-dependent processes on endothelial cells. Individuals who lack CD36 expression on monocytes are at risk of developing anti-CD36 antibodies (anti-NaKa) directed against the 155-183 region.36 The finding that infected erythrocytes bind to the CD36 multifunctional immunodominant domain raises the question of the effect of PE sequestration on CD36-dependent functions. Malaria-infected erythrocytes were found to activate monocytes and platelets, presumably by binding to CD36.25 Injection of peptides from the CD36 139-184 region may also have some adverse effect. However, it is conceivable that only a brief treatment will be required to affect PE adhesion resulting in release of sequestrating parasites to the circulation, without any prolonged adverse effect on the host.

In summary, we identified the extended immunodominant multifunctional domain of CD36 (residues 139-184) as the PE binding domain and in particular residues 145-171 and 146-164. Peptides from this domain blocked PE adherence in vitro and may be of therapeutic value. These findings expand our knowledge about the molecular interactions between infected erythrocytes and CD36.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Dr John Barnwell for providing MoAb 8A6 and Andrew Hutchinson for the ZZ-ICAM-1 recombinant protein.


    FOOTNOTES

Submitted November 3, 1998; accepted May 12, 1999.

Supported by Affymax Research Institute and Grant No. (HRN-6001-A-00-2043-00) to R.J.H from the United States Agency for International Development Malaria Vaccine Development Program.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address reprint requests to Dror I. Baruch, MD, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, NIAID, NIH Bldg 4, Room B1-37, 4 Center Dr, MSC 0425, Bethesda, MD 20892; e-mail: dbaruch{at}niaid.nih.gov.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. MacPherson GG, Warrell MG, White NJ, Looareesuwan S, Warrell DA: Human cerebral malaria: A quantitative ultrastructural analysis of parasitized erythrocyte sequestration. Am J Pathol 119:385, 1985[Abstract]

2. Howard RJ, Gilladoga AD: Molecular studies related to the pathogenesis of cerebral malaria. Blood 74:2603, 1989[Free Full Text]

3. Langreth SG, Peterson E: Pathogenicity, stability and immunogenicity of a knobless clone of Plasmodium falciparum in Colombian owl monkeys. Infect Immun 47:760, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Miller LH, Good MF, Milon G: Malaria pathogenesis. Science 264:1878, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Turner GDH, Morrison H, Jones M, Davis TME, Looareesuwan S, Buley ID, Gatter KC, Newbold CI, Pukritayakamee S, Nagachinta B, White NJ, Berendt AR: An immunohistochemical study of the pathology of fatal malaria. Am J Pathol 145:1057, 1994[Abstract]

6. Turner G: Cerebral malaria. Brain Pathol 7:569, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Roberts DD, Sherwood JA, Spitanlink SL, Panton LJ, Howard RJ, Dixit VM, Frazier WA, Miller LH, Ginsburg V: Thrombospondin binds falciparum malaria parasitized erythrocytes and may mediate cytoadherence. Nature 318:64, 1985[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Barnwell JW, Ockenhouse CF, Knowles Dd: Monoclonal antibody OKM5 inhibits the in vitro binding of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes to monocytes, endothelial, and C32 melanoma cells. J Immunol 135:3494, 1985[Abstract]

9. Berendt AR, Simmons DL, Tansey J, Newbold CI, Marsh K: Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 is an endothelial cell adhesion receptor for Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 341:57, 1989[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Rogerson SJ, Chaiyaroj SC, Ng K, Reeder JC, Brown GV: Chondroitin sulfate a is a cell surface receptor for plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Exp Med 182:15, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Treutiger CJ, Heddini A, Fernandez V, Muller WA, Wahlgren M: PECAM-1/CD31, an endothelial receptor for binding Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Nat Med 3:1315, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Ockenhouse CF, Tegoshi T, Maeno Y, Benjamin C, Ho M, Kan KE, Thway Y, Win K, Aikawa M, Lobb RR: Human vascular endothelial cell adhesion receptors for Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes: Roles for endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. J Exp Med 176:1183, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Newbold C, Warn P, Black G, Berendt A, Craig A, Snow B, Msobo M, Peshu N, Marsh K: Receptor-specific adhesion and clinical-disease in plasmodium-falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 57:389, 1997

14. Ockenhouse CF, Ho M, Tandon NN, Van Seventer GA, Shaw S, White NJ, Jamieson GA, Chulay JD, Webster HK: Molecular basis of sequestration in severe and uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: Differential adhesion of infected erythrocytes to CD36 and ICAM-1. J Infect Dis 164:163, 1991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Cooke BM, Berendt AR, Craig AG, Mac Gregor J, Newbold CI, Nash GB: Rolling and stationary cytoadhesion of red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum: Separate roles for ICAM-1, CD36 and thrombospondin. Br J Haematol 87:162, 1994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Smith JD, Kyes S, Craig AG, Fagan T, Hudson-Taylor D, Miller LH, Baruch DI, Newbold CI: Analysis of adhesive domains from the A4VAR Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein-1 identifies a CD36 binding domain. Mol Biochemical Parasitol 97:133, 1998[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Baruch DI, Ma XC, Singh HB, Bi XH, Pasloske BL, Howard RJ: Identification of a region of Pfemp1 that mediates adherence of plasmodium-falciparum-infected erythrocytes to Cd36---conserved function with variant sequence. Blood 90:3766, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Knowles DMD, Tolidjian B, Marboe C, D'Agati V, Grimes M, Chess L: Monoclonal anti-human monocyte antibodies OKM1 and OKM5 possess distinctive tissue distributions including differential reactivity with vascular endothelium. J Immunol 132:2170, 1984[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Kuzu I, Bicknell R, Harris AL, Jones M, Gatter KC, Mason DY: Heterogeneity of vascular endothelial cells with relevance to diagnosis of vascular tumours. J Clin Pathol 45:143, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Daviet L, McGregor JL: Vascular Biology of Cd36---roles of this new adhesion molecule family in different disease states. Thromb Haemost 78:65, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Acton SL, Scherer PE, Lodish HF, Krieger M: Expression cloning of SR-BI, a CD36-related class B scavenger receptor. J Biol Chem 269:21003, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Calvo D, Dopazo J, Vega MA: The CD36, CLA-1 (CD36L1), and LIMPII (CD36L2) gene family: Cellular distribution, chromosomal location, and genetic evolution. Genomics 25:100, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Ren Y, Silverstein RL, Allen J, Savill J: CD36 gene transfer confers capacity for phagocytosis of cells undergoing apoptosis. J Exp Med 181:1857, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rigotti A, Acton SL, Krieger M: The class B scavenger receptors SR-BI and CD36 are receptors for anionic phospholipids. J Biol Chem 270:16221, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Ockenhouse CF, Magowan C, Chulay JD: Activation of monocytes and platelets by monoclonal antibodies or malaria-infected erythrocytes binding to the CD36 surface receptor in vitro. J Clin Invest 84:468, 1989

26. Lipsky RH, Eckert DM, Tang Y, Ockenhouse CF: The carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of CD36 is required for oxidized low-density lipoprotein modulation of NF-kappaB activity by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Recept Signal Transduct 7:1, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Leung LL, Li WX, McGregor JL, Albrecht G, Howard RJ: CD36 peptides enhance or inhibit CD36-thrombospondin binding. A two-step process of ligand-receptor interaction. J Biol Chem 267:18244, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Greenwalt DE, Lipsky RH, Ockenhouse CF, Ikeda H, Tandon NN, Jamieson GA: Membrane glycoprotein CD36: A review of its roles in adherence, signal transduction, and transfusion medicine. Blood 80:1105, 1992[Free Full Text]

29. Endemann G, Stanton LW, Madden KS, Bryant CM, White RT, Protter AA: CD36 is a receptor for oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem 268:11811, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Abumrad NA, el-Maghrabi MR, Amri EZ, Lopez E, Grimaldi PA: Cloning of a rat adipocyte membrane protein implicated in binding or transport of long-chain fatty acids that is induced during preadipocyte differentiation. Homology with human CD36. J Biol Chem 268:17665, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Mercier N, Catimel B, Reck MP, Pellecchia D, McGregor JL: Identification of a functional site on CD36 involved in the interaction between platelets and collagen. Platelets 6:139, 1995

32. Pearce SFA, Wu J, Silverstein RL: Recombinant GST/CD36 fusion proteins define a thrombospondin binding domain. Evidence for a single calcium-dependent binding site on CD36. J Biol Chem 270:2981, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Navazo MD, Daviet L, Savill J, Ren Y, Leung LL, McGregor JL: Identification of a domain (155-183) on CD36 implicated in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils. J Biol Chem 271:15381, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Navazo MDP, Daviet L, Ninio E, Mcgregor JL: Identification on human CD36 of a domain (155-183) implicated in binding oxidized low-density lipoproteins (Ox-LDL). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16:1033, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Baruch DI, Gormley JA, Ma C, Howard RJ, Pasloske BL: Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 is a parasitized erythrocyte receptor for adherence to CD36, thrombospondin, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3497, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Daviet L, Morel-Kopp MC, Kaplan C, McGregor JL: A structural/functional domain on human CD36 is involved in the binding of anti-Nak(a) antibodies. Thromb Haemost 73:543, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Pearce SF, Roy P, Nicholson AC, Hajjar DP, Febbraio M, Silverstein RL: Recombinant gluthathione S-transferase/CD36 fusion proteins define an oxidized low density lipoprotein-binding domain. J Biol Chem 273:34875, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Li WX, Howard RJ, Leung LL: Identification of SVTCG in thrombospondin as the conformation-dependent, high affinity binding site for its receptor, CD36. J Biol Chem 268:16179, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Daviet L, Buckland R, Puente Navazo MD, McGregor JL: Identification of an immunodominant functional domain on human CD36 antigen using human-mouse chimaeric proteins and homologue-replacement mutagenesis. Biochem J 305:221, 1995

40. Daviet L, Craig AG, McGregor L, Pinches R, Wild TF, Berendt AR, Newbold CI, McGregor JL: Characterization of 2 vaccinia Cd36 recombinant-virus-generated monoclonal-antibodies (10/5, 13/10)---effects on malarial cytoadherence and platelet functions. Eur J Biochem 243:344, 1997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Baruch DI, Pasloske BL, Singh HB, Bi X, Ma XC, Feldman M, Taraschi TF, Howard RJ: Cloning the P. falciparum gene encoding PfEMP1, a malarial variant antigen and adherence receptor on the surface of parasitized human erythrocytes. Cell 82:77, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Hasler T, Albrecht GR, Van Schravendijk MR, Aguiar JC, Morehead KE, Pasloske BL, Ma C, Barnwell JW, Greenwood B, Howard RJ: An improved microassay for Plasmodium falciparum cytoadherence using stable transformants of Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing CD36 or intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Am J Trop Med Hyg 48:332, 1993

43. Su X-Z, Heatwole V, Wertheimer SP, Guinet F, Herrfeldt JA, Peterson DS, Ravetch JA, Wellems TE: The large and diverse gene family var encodes proteins involved in the cytoadherence and antigenic variation of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Cell 82:89, 1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Ockenhouse CF, Betageri R, Springer TA, Staunton TE: Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes bind ICAM-1 at a site distinct from LFA-1, Mac-1, and human rhinovirus. Cell 68:63, 1992[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Gardner JP, Pinches RA, Roberts DJ, Newbold CI: Variant antigens and endothelial receptor adhesion in plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3503, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Asch AS, Liu I, Briccetti FM, Barnwell JW, Kwakye-Berko F, Dokun A, Goldberger J, Pernambuco M: Analysis of CD36 binding domains: Ligand specificity controlled by dephosphorylation of an ectodomain. Science 262:1436, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Fried M, Duffy PE: Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum chondroitin sulfate A in the human placenta. Science 272:1502, 1996[Abstract]


© 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.
 
0006-4971/99/9406-0009$3.00/0

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Mo, H. C. Lee, M. Kotaka, M. Niang, X. Gao, J. K. Iyer, J. Lescar, and P. Preiser
The C-Terminal Segment of the Cysteine-Rich Interdomain of Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein 1 Determines CD36 Binding and Elicits Antibodies That Inhibit Adhesion of Parasite-Infected Erythrocytes
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2008; 76(5): 1837 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. A. Magistrado, J. Lusingu, L. S. Vestergaard, M. Lemnge, T. Lavstsen, L. Turner, L. Hviid, A. T. R. Jensen, and T. G. Theander
Immunoglobulin G Antibody Reactivity to a Group A Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein 1 and Protection from P. falciparum Malaria
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2007; 75(5): 2415 - 2420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. M. Ndungu, L. Sanni, B. Urban, R. Stephens, C. I. Newbold, K. Marsh, and J. Langhorne
CD4 T Cells from Malaria-Nonexposed Individuals Respond to the CD36-Binding Domain of Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein-1 via an MHC Class II-TCR-Independent Pathway
J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5504 - 5512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Ho, H. L. Hoang, K. M. Lee, N. Liu, T. MacRae, L. Montes, C. L. Flatt, B. G. Yipp, B. J. Berger, S. Looareesuwan, et al.
Ectophosphorylation of CD36 Regulates Cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum to Microvascular Endothelium under Flow Conditions
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2005; 73(12): 8179 - 8187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. G. Yipp, S. M. Robbins, M. E. Resek, D. I. Baruch, S. Looareesuwan, and M. Ho
Src-family kinase signaling modulates the adhesion of Plasmodium falciparum on human microvascular endothelium under flow
Blood, April 1, 2003; 101(7): 2850 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. G. Yipp, D. I. Baruch, C. Brady, A. G. Murray, S. Looareesuwan, P. Kubes, and M. Ho
Recombinant PfEMP1 peptide inhibits and reverses cytoadherence of clinical Plasmodium falciparum isolates in vivo
Blood, January 1, 2003; 101(1): 331 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Gruarin, L. Primo, C. Ferrandi, F. Bussolino, N. N. Tandon, P. Arese, D. Ulliers, and M. Alessio
Cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum-Infected Erythrocytes Is Mediated by a Redox-Dependent Conformational Fraction of CD36
J. Immunol., December 1, 2001; 167(11): 6510 - 6517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Pain, D. J. P. Ferguson, O. Kai, B. C. Urban, B. Lowe, K. Marsh, and D. J. Roberts
Platelet-mediated clumping of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes is a common adhesive phenotype and is associated with severe malaria
PNAS, February 13, 2001; 98(4): 1805 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Red Cells
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020