|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 95 No. 2 (January 15), 2000:
pp. 510-518
HEMATOPOIESIS
Protein kinase C- isoform is involved in erythropoietin-induced
erythroid differentiation of CD34+ progenitor cells from
human bone marrow
June Helen Myklebust,
Erlend B. Smeland,
Dag Josefsen, and
Mouldy Sioud
From the Department of Immunology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital,
Oslo, Norway.
 |
Abstract |
Protein kinase C (PKC) is a family of serine/threonine protein
kinases involved in many cellular responses. Although the analysis of
PKC activity in many systems has provided crucial insights to its
biologic function, the precise role of different isoforms on the
differentiation of normal hematopoietic progenitor cells into the
various lineages remains to be investigated. The authors have assessed
the state of activation and protein expression of PKC isoforms after
cytokine stimulation of CD34+ progenitor cells from human
bone marrow. Freshly isolated CD34+ cells were found to
express PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- , whereas PKC- , PKC- , and
PKC- were not detected. Treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) or with
EPO and stem cell factor (SCF) induced a predominantly erythroid
differentiation of CD34+ cells that was accompanied by
the up-regulation of PKC- and PKC- 2 protein levels (11.8- and
2.5-fold, respectively) compared with cells cultured in medium.
Stimulation with EPO also resulted in the nuclear translocation of
PKC- and PKC- 2 isoforms. Notably, none of the PKC isoforms tested
were detectable in CD34+ cells induced to myeloid
differentiation by G-CSF and SCF stimulation. The PKC inhibitors
staurosporine and calphostin C prevented EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation. Down-regulation of the PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC-
expression by TPA pretreatment, or the down-regulation of PKC- with
a specific ribozyme, also inhibited the EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of CD34+ cells. No effect was seen with
PKC- 2-specific ribozymes. Taken together, these findings point to a
novel role for the PKC- isoform in mediating EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of the CD34+ progenitor cells from human
bone marrow.
(Blood. 2000;95:510-518)
© 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
Introduction |
A small pool of pluripotent, hematopoietic stem cells
that reside in the bone marrow gives rise to all blood cell types
through a process of simultaneous lineage commitment, cell
proliferation, and differentiation. This process is, at least in part,
regulated by a complex network of hematopoietic growth
factors.1-3 Erythropoietin (EPO) and stem cell factor (SCF)
are the 2 most prominent cytokines that regulate erythropoiesis. EPO
alone is able to induce erythroid cell development and maturation from
progenitor cells,4 but EPO and SCF combined induce an
enhanced synergistic proliferation and expansion of developing
erythroid cells.5,6 The development of myeloid cells from
progenitor cells is supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
(G-CSF) or granulocyte macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) alone, but it is
enhanced when either of these is combined with
IL-37 or SCF.5,8,9 Furthermore, GM-CSF in
combination with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- induces the
development of dendritic cells,10 whereas IL-15 in
combination with SCF induces the differentiation of natural killer
cells from progenitor cells.11
Most hematopoietic growth factors are able to activate common signaling
pathways, such as the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway, and the PI3 kinase pathway.
However, it is still unclear how growth factors elicit varied
developmental responses in hematopoietic progenitors. Candidate
intracellular regulatory molecules are members of the protein kinase C
(PKC) family of serine/threonine kinases. Based on their biochemical
properties and sequence homologies, they have been divided into 3 subclasses12,13 the conventional PKCs (PKC- , PKC- I,
PKC- 2, and PKC- ), which are activated by diacylglycerol, phosphatidylserine, and Ca++; the novel PKCs (PKC- ,
PKC- , PKC- , PKC- , and PKC-µ), which are activated by
diacylglycerol and phosphatidylserine but independently of
Ca++; and the atypical PKCs (PKC- , PKC- , and
PKC- ), which only respond to phosphatidylserine. The existence of
this large family of PKC isoforms suggests that individual PKC isoforms
likely have specific roles in signal transduction. The phorbol ester
PMA, which activates the conventional and novel PKCs, has
been shown to induce macrophage differentiation of the myelomonocytic
cell line U93714 and the promyelocytic cell line
HL60.15 Lineage commitment of hematopoietic progenitors
transformed by the E26 avian leukemia virus was determined by the level
of PKC activity: high PKC activity favored eosinophil differentiation,
low PKC activity favored myelomonocytic development, and without PKC
activity, the progenitor phenotype was maintained.16 It has
also been proposed that PKC plays a role in the lineage determination
of erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation because PMA stimulates megakaryocytic development and inhibits erythroid
development.17,18 Other studies19-21 of human
and murine erythroleukemic cells have shown that the modulation of
PKC- , PKC- , or both may play an important role in erythroid maturation.
However, the results obtained with transformed or leukemic cell lines
may not represent the features of normal cells. CD34+ cells
from human bone marrow are a heterogeneous population of multipotent
progenitors and thus can be used to study the functional role of each
PKC isoform in growth factor-induced differentiation. A versatile
method for defining the specific cellular functions of PKC isoforms is
to investigate changes in their gene expression during growth
factor-induced cell differentiation and then to inhibit gene expression
of candidate isoforms and to study the possible effects on cell
differentiation. Accordingly, in the current study we purified
CD34+ progenitor cells from human bone marrow and
investigated the distribution of various PKC isoforms in these cells
after different types of cytokine stimulation. Furthermore, we
evaluated the effect of PKC- and PKC- 2 inhibition on this
process, in particular EPO-induced erythroid differentiation.
 |
Materials and methods |
Reagents and antibodies
Recombinant human (rhu) EPO and liposomal transfection reagent
(DOTAP) were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (GmbH; Mannheim, Germany), recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhu
G-CSF) was purchased from Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA), and recombinant
human stem cell factor (rhu SCF) was purchased from R&D Systems
(Abingdon, UK). Staurosporine, calphostin C, and
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) were purchased from Sigma
Chemical (St. Louis, MO). The following antibodies were used: anti-CD34
PE (HPCA-2; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA); anti-glycophorin A-PE,
anti-CD13 PE, anti-CD14 fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD15
FITC, anti-CD71 FITC, anti-CD83 FITC, anti-CD86 FITC, anti-CD41 FITC, anti-HLA DR (DAKO AS, Glostrup, Denmark); rabbit antiserum Mcl-1 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA); rabbit polyclonal IgG
anti-Bcl-xL, anti-Bax, anti-PKC- , anti- PKC- 2,
anti-PKC- , anti-PKC- , anti-PKC- (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA); anti-PKC- (Boehringer Mannheim); and goat
antirabbit IgG-HRP (DAKO AS).
Cell separation
Bone marrow cells were aspirated from the iliac crest of healthy
adult donors with their informed consent and with the approval of the
regional ethics committee. Mononuclear cells were separated by
Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep, 1.077 mg/L; Nycomed
Pharma, Oslo, Norway), washed twice, and resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco, Life Technologies A/S,
Tåstrup, Denmark). Positive selection of CD34+ cells
was performed as previously described.22 Briefly, bone marrow mononuclear cells formed rosettes with Dynabead M-450 directly coated with anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody (mAb; Dynal, Oslo, Norway) in
RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS for 30 minutes at 4°C, rotation
(40 × 106 cells/mL, and a 1:1 bead-to-cell ratio).
Rosetted cells were attracted to a magnet (MPC-6; Dynal) and washed 6 times. Nonrosetted cells were removed by pipetting. Beads were detached
from positively selected cells after incubation for 45 minutes at room
temperature with anti-FAB serum (DETACHaBEAD for CD34; Dynal) diluted
1:1 in RPMI with 10% FCS. Then a magnet captured the beads, and the supernatant containing the detached cells was transferred to a new
tube. Cells were washed twice in RPMI with 10% FCS and counted before
use. More than 95% of the isolated cells were reproducible CD34+ cells.
Cell culture
CD34+ cells (2 × 105 to
3 × 106) were plated in 1 to 2 mL X-VIVO 15 medium
containing 1% bovine serum albumin (Stem Cell, Vancouver, BC), 300 mg/L L-glutamine, 66 mg/L penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (referred to as X-VIVO 15 complete medium) in 24-well plates without cytokines or with EPO (5 U/mL), SCF (50 ng/mL), or SCF and either EPO
or G-CSF (50 ng/mL). After incubation at 37°C in air for 4 days or
as specified, cytoplasmic and membrane proteins were prepared and
analyzed by Western blotting. During experiments in which nuclear
protein extracts were prepared, the CD34+ cells were
incubated in medium for 24 hours before EPO (5 U/mL) was added.
PKC inhibition by staurosporine and calphostin C
CD34+ cells were cultured in X-VIVO 15 complete medium
(105 cells in 0.5 mL per well in 24-well plates; Stem Cell)
in the absence or presence of various concentrations of staurosporine
or calphostin C without cytokines or with either EPO (5 U/mL) or
combined EPO and SCF (50 ng/mL) (see figure legends). The cells were
immunophenotyped after incubation for 7 days.
Inhibition of PKC- and PKC- 2 isoform expression by
specific ribozymes
The CD34+ cells were seeded at 30 000 cells per well in
100 µL X-VIVO 15 complete medium in flat-bottomed, 96-well plates and then incubated with ribozymes complexed with DOTAP (Boehringer Mannheim) at 5 µg/mL as described by the manufacturer. After 24-hour transfection, EPO (5 U/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL) were added to the cells
and incubated at 37°C for 5 or 7 days before protein or phenotypic
analysis, respectively. The ribozymes used in this study were made in
vitro as previously described.23 The PKC- ribozyme
sequence is 5'-GGGAACUGAUGAGUCCGUGAGGACGAAACGUCAGCCAUGG-3' and the PKC- 2 sequence is
5'-GCGCGGGCUGAUGAGUCCGUGAGGACGAAACCGGAGCCCG-3'.
Immunophenotyping
Cells were incubated with the specified mAbs for 30 minutes at
4°C and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Stained cells
were analyzed on an FACScan flow cytometer with an argon-ion laser
tuned at 488 nm (Becton Dickinson). Data acquisition and analysis were
performed by CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson).
Cytoplasmic, nuclear, and membrane protein preparations
Preparation of cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins.
Control and treated cells were washed twice with PBS, and the cell
pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (0.2% Nonidet-40 and protease
inhibitors, protease inhibitor kit; Boehringer Mannheim) in PBS. After
20-minute incubation on ice, samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at
15 000 rpm, 4°C. Supernatants containing cytosolic proteins were
transferred to new tubes, and pellets containing the nucleus were
washed 3 times in 20 mmol/L HEPES and resuspended in lysis
buffer (0.08 mol/L sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.0625 mol/L Tris, 10%
glycerol, and 5% -mercaptoethanol). After they were boiled for 20 minutes, nuclear extracts were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 15 000 rpm
at 4°C, and the supernatants containing the nuclear proteins were
transferred to new tubes.
Preparation of cytosol and membrane proteins.
Cells were washed twice in PBS and resuspended in 50 to 100 µL buffer
A (5 mmol/L Tris, pH 8, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, and 75 mmol/L sucrose) with
protease inhibitors. After 4× sonication (10 seconds each),
nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The
supernatants were transferred to new tubes and ultracentrifuged for 30 minutes at 30 000 rpm (4°C). Supernatants containing the cytosol
proteins were transferred to new tubes, and the pellets were carefully
washed 4 times with PBS and resuspended in buffer A containing 1%
Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors. After 10-minute incubation on
ice, samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 15 000 rpm (4°C).
Supernatants were saved as membrane-protein extracts. In all cases,
protein concentrations were determined using the protein assay kit
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
Immunoblotting
Typically, 5 to 30 µg total protein was separated by
electrophoresis on 10% sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide mini-gels (Bio-Rad). The separated
proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Protran;
Schleicher & Schuell GmbH, Dassel, Germany) by electrotransfer and
blocked for 60 minutes at room temperature with 5% dry milk in
Tris-buffer (TBS-T; 0.1 mol/L Tris, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, and 0.1%
Tween-20). After blocking, membranes were incubated for 60 minutes with
one of these antibodies: anti-Bcl-xL rabbit polyclonal IgG,
anti-Bax rabbit polyclonal IgG, anti Mcl-1 rabbit antiserum,
anti-PKC- rabbit polyclonal IgG, anti- PKC- 2 rabbit polyclonal
IgG, anti-PKC- rabbit polyclonal IgG, anti-PKC- rabbit polyclonal
IgG, or anti-PKC- rabbit polyclonal IgG. All antibodies were used at
0.2 µg/mL except the anti-PKC- rabbit polyclonal IgG antibody,
which was used at 0.4 µg/mL). After they were washed for
5 × 10 minutes with TBS-T at room temperature, the filters were
incubated for 60 minutes with horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary
antibody (goat antirabbit IgG-HRP) at room temperature. Then the
immunoreactive proteins were visualized by the chemiluminescence system, ECL (Amersham, Braunschwieg, Germany). When less than 10 µg
protein was analyzed, the enhanced chemiluminescence system ECL
PLUS+ (Amersham) was used. In all cases equal loading was
proved by subsequent Ponceau red staining of the filters. Densitometric analysis was performed with a Personal Densitometer SI (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) using ImageQuant 5.0 software (Molecular Dynamics). Whenever more than 1 band appears on the PKC- or PKC- 2 blot, only the expected 80-kd band was used for quantitation. No bands
for PKC- were detected when the membranes were preincubated with the
corresponding immunizing peptide for PKC- (control peptide) (data
not shown).
Total RNA preparation and reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction
Total RNA was prepared as described by Chomczynski and
Sacchi,24 and 1 µg was reverse transcribed using the
first-strand cDNA synthesis kit and oligo-dT primer as recommended by
the manufacturer (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) was performed on half the product (4 µL) using
specific primers for PKC-
(5'-ATCCGCAGTGGAATGAGTCCTTTACAT-3' and
5'-TTGGAAGGTTGTTTCCTGTCTT CAGAG-3'; Eurogentec,
Seraing, Belgium). As a control, actin mRNA was coamplified using the
following primers: 5'-TGCCCAGGAAAGGCTGGAAGAG-3' and
5'-GGCGACGAGGCCCAGAGCAAGAGAG-3' (Eurogentec). After 30 cycles of amplification (1 minute at 92°C; 1 minute at 56°C; 1 minute at 72°C), samples were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.2%
agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of between-group differences was
determined using the paired, 2-tailed Wilcoxon nonparametric test and
by applying SPSS 8.0 software.
 |
Results |
Expression of PKC isoforms in CD34+ progenitor
cells from human bone marrow
We used Western blotting to analyze the profile of PKC isoform
protein expression in freshly isolated CD34+ progenitor
cells from human bone marrow (Figure 1).
Among the investigated PKC isoforms, PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC-
were detected. The same expression pattern was also found in
CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood, but the level
of expression was higher than in CD34+ bone marrow cells
(not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Protein expression of different PKC isoforms in freshly
isolated CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow.
B cells (BC) and the glioma cell lines BT4c and U87GM were included as
positive controls. The CD34+ cells were selected as
described in "Materials and Methods," and cytosolic proteins were
prepared and analyzed by Western blotting. A representative of 3 separate experiments is shown. Note that for B cells and
CD34+ cells, the bands below 80 kd for PKC- , PKC- 2,
and PKC- were possible degradation products resulting from
activation.
|
|
High level of PKC- and PKC- 2 isoforms in CD34+
cells stimulated by erythropoietin
We next investigated whether different PKC isoforms could play
different roles during the differentiation process of CD34+
progenitor cells. CD34+ cells are able to differentiate in
vitro into different hematopoietic lineages, depending on the cytokine
combination given. Alone or in combination with SCF, EPO induces
erythroid differentiation.25 There was an increase from 0%
at day 0 to 46% or 70% glycophorin A+CD71+
cells after 4 or 8 days with EPO and SCF (Josefsen et al, manuscript submitted). G-CSF and SCF increase the development of myeloid cells.5 There was an increase in CD15+
granulocytes from 22% at day 0 to 77% or 80% after 4 or 8 days with
G-CSF and SCF (Josefsen et al, manuscript submitted). Interestingly, when we examined the expression of PKC isoforms in CD34+
cells cultured for 4 days, PKC- was detected in EPO- and
EPO/SCF-stimulated cells and displayed 11.8- and 14.4-fold higher
levels, respectively, than cells cultured in medium alone (Figure
2A, B). Only minor changes was detected in
PKC- 2 expression after EPO-treatment (2.5-fold higher level),
whereas no significant change was detected with EPO and SCF treatment
(Figure 2C). PKC- was usually no longer detectable, but when it was
expressed, it showed equally weak expression levels in medium and in
EPO- and SCF-treated cells. None of the tested PKC isoforms were
detected when the CD34+ cells differentiated into myeloid
cells after SCF and G-CSF stimulation (Figure 2A). As a control for
protein loading, the expression of the pro-apoptotic molecule Bax was
also investigated because the different cytokine stimulations were
found to have only minor effects on its expression (Josefsen et al,
manuscript submitted).



View larger version (471818K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Protein expression of different PKC isoforms in
CD34+ progenitor cells cultured with different cytokines.
CD34+ cells were cultured in vitro for 4 days in medium
alone or in the presence of EPO (5 U/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL), G-CSF (50 ng/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL), EPO (5 U/mL), or SCF (50 ng/mL) before the
preparation of cytosolic proteins. Relative protein expressions of
PKC- , PKC- 2, PKC- , PKC- , PKC- , PKC- , and Bax were
determined by Western blotting. (A) One representative blot is shown.
Note that for BT4c and U87GM, the upper band for PKC- is possibly a
phosphorylated form. (B) Optical density of PKC- , determined by
densitometric imaging of hyperfilms, is shown. Mean ± SEM of 5 to
12 separate experiments (*P < .001, n = 12;
P = .009, n = 5). The expected 80-kd band is used for
quantitation. (C) Optical density of PKC- 2, determined by
densitometric imaging of hyperfilms, is shown. Mean ± SEM of 5 to 8 separate experiments (*P = .046, n = 5).
|
|
Erythropoietin-induced nuclear translocation of PKC- and
PKC- 2
Because incubation of the CD34+ cells with EPO showed
higher protein levels of PKC- and PKC- 2 than cells cultured in
medium alone, we next examined the effect of such treatment on their cellular distribution. In contrast to Bcl-2 family member
Bcl-xL, PKC- and PKC- 2 did not show membrane
translocation by EPO or SCF treatment (Figure
3). Further experiments were performed to determine whether EPO induces the translocation of PKC- , PKC- 2, or both to the nucleus. To rule out the possibility of already activated CD34+ cells, the cells were incubated in medium
for 24 hours before the addition of EPO. Interestingly, EPO induced
significant up-regulation of PKC- and PKC- 2 nuclear translocation
20 hours after its addition (PKC- : P = .028, n = 5;
PKC- 2: P = .047, n = 5) (Figures
4A to 4C), whereas there was no significant
up-regulation of PKC- (Figure 4D). The up-regulation of PKC- and
PKC- 2 in the nucleus was transient. It was already detectable 2 hours after the addition of EPO, and it remained high after 20 hours
(Figure 4A). After 72 hours the expression of these isoforms decreased,
though it was still higher than it had been before the addition of EPO
(Figure 4A). In contrast to the nuclear protein level of PKC- and
PKC- 2, we did not observe a significant change of the cytosolic
protein level of these PKCs in CD34+ cells stimulated with
EPO for 20 hours, compared with freshly isolated cells. However, a
decrease in the cytosolic level of these isoforms was observed in a few
experiments (Figure 4A). For longer incubation times with EPO (3-7 days), PKC- and PKC- 2 expression usually decreased compared with
the cytosolic level in freshly isolated cells, but it was still
detectable after 7 days (Figures 3 and 4A). The cytosolic protein level
of PKC- decreased faster than the other isoforms and was usually not
detected at 72 hours or later (Figure 4A). Taken together, PKC- and
PKC- 2 isoforms showed translocation to the nucleus, thus indicating activation and nuclear signaling in CD34+ cells.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Protein expression of PKC- and PKC- 2 in cytosolic
and membrane fractions during EPO and SCF stimulation of
CD34+ cells for various times.
CD34+ cells were cultured in the presence of EPO (5 U/mL)
and SCF (50 ng/mL) for various times before the preparation of
cytosolic and membrane proteins. Protein expressions of PKC- ,
PKC- 2, and Bcl-xL were determined by Western blotting. A
representative of 3 separate experiments is shown. C, cytosolic
fractions; M, membrane fractions; d, days.
|
|




View larger version (30252626K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Protein expression of PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- in
cytosolic and nuclear fraction of CD34+ cells during EPO
stimulation for various times.
CD34+ cells were cultured in medium alone for 24 hours
before the addition of EPO (5 U/mL) and then were incubated for various
times before cytosolic and nuclear proteins were prepared. The protein
expression of PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- was determined by Western
blotting. (A) A representative of 5 separate experiments is shown. *,
not performed. (B) Optical density of PKC- determined
by densitometric imaging of hyperfilms is shown. Mean ± SEM of 5 separate experiments (*P = .028, n = 5). (C) Optical
density of PKC- 2 determined by densitometric imaging of hyperfilms
is shown. Mean ± SEM of 5 separate experiments
(*P = .047, n = 5). (D) Optical density of PKC-
determined by densitometric imaging of hyperfilms is shown. Mean ± SEM of 3 separate experiments.
|
|
Inhibitors of PKC block the erythropoietin-induced erythroid
differentiation of CD34+ progenitor cells
To investigate further the role of PKC isoforms in EPO-signaling in
CD34+ progenitor cells, we assessed the effect of the PKC
inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin C on this process. The
EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of CD34+ cells was
significantly inhibited with either straurosporine or calphostin C as
determined by the expression of glycophorin A, an erythroid antigen
(P = .006; n = 6 and P = .046; n = 3, respectively) (Figure 5C). Notably,
staurosporine (50 nmol/L) increased the percentage of CD13+
cells from 21% ± 3% to 71% ± 6%, whereas calphostin C (50 nmol/L) increased the percentage of CD13+ cells to 33% ± 6% and the percentage of CD15+ cells from 23% ± 5% to 64% ± 10%. CD13 is a pan myeloid antigen, whereas CD15 is
primarily expressed on the granulocytic lineage. A lower concentration
of staurosporine (20 nmol/L) induced approximately identical changes
(Figure 5C). Cell counts of the cultures showed a 20% or 17%
reduction with 50 nmol/L staurosporine or calphostin C, respectively,
whereas no reduction in cell number was found with a lower
concentration (20 nmol/L) (Table
1). Similarly, the PKC inhibitors
reduced significantly the percentage of erythroid cells in EPO- and
SCF-treated CD34+ cells (P = .004, n = 6 and
P = .037, n = 3, respectively) (Figures 5A, 5D). Again the
percentage of CD15 granulocytes increased from 8% ± 2% to 36% ± 5% or 60% ± 3% with staurosporine or calphostin C
treatment (50 nmol/L), respectively. Cell counts of these cultures showed no reduction in cell number (Table 1). These results indicate that the PKC inhibitors inhibited the EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of the CD34+ progenitor cells, and they are
consistent with the notion that the inhibition of PKC activity is
necessary for myeloid differentiation.




View larger version (54353631K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
Effect of the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin
C on the EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of CD34+
cells.
CD34+ cells were cultured in medium alone or in the
presence of EPO (5 U/mL) or EPO (5 U/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL), with or
without staurosporine (50 nmol/L or 20 nmol/L) or calphostin C (50 nmol/L or 20 nmol/L) for 7 days and then stained with the indicated
monoclonal antibodies. (A) Immunophenotyping of CD34+ cells
cultured in the presence of EPO and SCF without or with staurosporine
(50 nM) or calphostin C (50 nM). A representative of 6 separate
experiments is shown. GPA, glycophorin A. CD34+ cells with
or without staurosporine or calphostin C were cultured in medium alone
(B), in the presence of EPO (C), or in the presence of EPO and SCF (D).
indicates the percentage of GPA+ cells, ,
CD13+ cells, and , of CD15+ cells. Mean ± SEM of 6 separate experiments (3 for the calphostin C results).
|
|
PKC- but not PKC- 2 is necessary for the
erythropoietin-induced differentiation of CD34+ cells
To address the functional role of PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- ,
all of which are expressed by freshly isolated CD34+ cells,
we investigated the effect of their depletion by long-term TPA
treatment before EPO and SCF stimulation. Exposure of the cells to 100 nmol/L TPA for 24 hours resulted in the depletion of PKC- , PKC- 2,
and PKC- by 47%, 92%, and 95%, respectively (Figure
6). Interestingly, TPA treatment before the
addition of EPO and SCF strongly inhibited erythroid differentiation
compared with cells preincubated in medium alone (Table
2). Notably, TPA pretreatment increased the
percentage of CD13 and major histocompatibility complex class
II-positive cells and induced the expression of CD86, indicating
development into dendritic cells.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
TPA treatment of CD34+ cells down-regulate
the expression of PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- .
CD34+ cells were cultured in medium alone or in the
presence of 100 nmol/L TPA for 24 hours. Then cytosolic proteins were
prepared, and the expression of PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- was
analyzed by Western blotting.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
TPA treatment of CD34+ cells before EPO-
and SCF- addition inhibits the cytokine-induced erythroid
differentiation
|
|
To determine directly the functional roles of PKC- and PKC- 2 on
EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of CD34+ progenitor
cells, ribozymes against PKC- and PKC- 2 mRNA were introduced into
CD34+ cells by means of liposomes (DOTAP). The usefulness
of various types of liposomes for the delivery of ribozymes into
eucaryotic cells, including lipofectin26 and
DOTAP,27-29 has been explored. Cationic lipid-mediated
ribozyme delivery has the advantage of delivering ribozyme to the
cytoplasm without an intermediate endosomal stage, resulting in
ribozyme molecule escape from the degradative lysosomal enzymes. To
find optimal conditions, the effect of various concentrations of DOTAP
on cell viability was tested. At 5 µg/mL, no significant cytotoxic
effect was observed. Using these conditions, a significant amount of
FITC-labeled ribozyme could be introduced into the cells after 24 hours
of incubation (data not shown). Thus, in the additional experiments,
cells were incubated with ribozyme/liposome complexes for 24 hours
before EPO and SCF stimulation. As shown in Figures
7 and 8A,
PKC- ribozyme treatment strongly inhibited the EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of the CD34+ cells (15% ± 5% GPA+ cells compared to 49% ± 6% in
DOTAP/medium control; n = 7). Maximal effect was obtained at 1 µmol/L. Treatment of CD34+ cells with this ribozyme
increased the percentage of CD13+ cells from 11% ± 3%
(medium or DOTAP controls) to 56% ± 7% (n = 7). The observed
effect is specific because the treatment of cells with the PKC- 2
ribozyme did not prevent EPO-induced erythroid differentiation (Figure
8A).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 7.
Concentration-dependent inhibition of EPO-induced
erythroid differentiation of CD34+ cells by PKC-
ribozyme.
CD34+ cells were incubated at 30 000 cells/well in
flat-bottomed, 96-well plates with different concentrations of PKC-
ribozyme for 24 hours. The cells were then stimulated with EPO (5 U/mL)
and SCF (50 ng/mL) and cultured for 7 days before they were stained
with the indicated mAbs. One representative of 4 separate experiments
is shown.
|
|




View larger version (49222731K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 8.
The effect of PKC- and PKC- 2 ribozymes on
CD34+ cells cultured with EPO and SCF.
The CD34+ cells were incubated at 30 000
cells/well in flat-bottomed, 96 well plates with PKC- ribozyme (2 µmol/L), PKC- 2 ribozyme (2 µmol/L), or medium for 24 hours and
then stimulated with EPO (5 U/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL.). (A) Cells were
stained with the indicated mAbs 8 days after transfection with
ribozymes. (B) Cytosolic proteins were prepared from cells cultured for
6 days after transfection. (C) Cytosolic proteins were prepared from
cells cultured for 6 days after transfection. Control cells were
transfected with a PKC- ribozyme that was not catalytic active. (D)
RT-PCR was performed on RNA prepared from cells cultured for 6 days
after transfection. PKC- , 320 bp; actin, 620 bp.
|
|
To investigate whether the PKC- ribozyme had down-regulated
its target, the expression of PKC- in control and ribozyme-treated cells was determined. The protein level of PKC- was reduced by 82%
(Figure 8B). This inhibition was specific because the level of PKC- 2
protein expression was not affected by the PKC- ribozyme treatment
(Figure 8B). Treatment of cells with PKC- 2 ribozyme reduced the
PKC- 2 protein expression by 92%, but, as shown in Figure 8A, this
treatment had no significant effect on EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of the CD34+ progenitor cells. The level of
PKC- in PKC- ribozyme-treated cells was not affected (Figure 8C).
In these experiments, a PKC- ribozyme that was found to be inactive
(unpublished results) was used as a relevant control. Quantitation of
PKC- mRNA by RT-PCR further demonstrated a significant reduction of
PKC- mRNA in PKC- ribozyme-treated cells compared with medium or
with PKC- 2 ribozyme-treated cells (Figure 8D). These results suggest
that PKC- , but not PKC- 2, is important for the EPO-induced
erythroid differentiation of human CD34+ progenitor cells.
 |
Discussion |
In the current study we investigated the role of different
PKC isoforms in CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow.
PKC- , PKC- 2, and PKC- were expressed in freshly isolated
CD34+ cells, whereas PKC- , PKC- , and PKC- were
undetectable. The different PKC isoforms were down-regulated after
stimulation of the CD34+ cells with G-CSF and SCF, which
predominantly led to the development of myeloid cells. Indeed, none of
the tested PKC isoforms were detectable after 4 days of culture. In
contrast, stimulation of CD34+ cells with EPO or EPO and
SCF for 4 days, which induced erythroid differentiation, led to a
marked up-regulation of PKC- expression compared to medium-treated
cells. Only minor up-regulation of PKC- 2 was detected, whereas
PKC- was usually no longer detectable. Furthermore, we found that
EPO induced the activation of PKC- and PKC- 2, as shown by the
translocation of these isoenzymes to the nucleus. Thus, the EPO-induced
up-regulation of PKC- and its nuclear translocation should be
biologically relevant for initiation and perhaps for sustained
erythroid differentiation. In contrast, myeloid differentiation induced
by G-CSF was followed by the down-regulation of PKC- and PKC- 2.
Several investigators, most of whom have used cell lines and
pharmacologic agents to induce erythroid differentiation, have suggested the involvement of PKC in erythroid
differentiation.30-34 In this regard, a possible role for
PKC in the commitment to erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages has been
proposed. The selective PKC antagonist GF109203X was shown to enhance
the hemin-increased expression of glycophorin A in human
erythroid/megacaryocytic cells.17 On the other hand, the
PKC activator PMA induced the development of megakaryocytes. In this
respect, Lumelsky and Schwartz18 reported similar findings
for human CD34+ progenitor-enriched cells from umbilical
cord blood. The addition of PMA drastically inhibited the EPO-induced
erythroid differentiation of these cells, even when added as late as 11 days after culture initiation. Consistent with this observation, we
found that pretreatment of CD34+ cells with TPA for 24 hours inhibited the EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of
CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow. As shown in Figure
6, TPA treatment strongly reduced the expression of PKC- , PKC- 2,
and PKC- . Instead of megakaryocytic development as a response to PMA
treatment,18 TPA pretreatment induced dendritic cell
differentiation (Table 2). PMA-induced dendritic cell differentiation
from CD34+ cells was also shown by Davis et
al.35 Furthermore, we found that inhibition of the PKC
activity with calphostin C, a specific inhibitor of PKC, highly
inhibited the EPO- and SCF-induced erythroid differentiation without
affecting the cell number. Calphostin C has been shown to inhibit the
development of macrophages from bipotent GM-colony forming cells
induced by IL-4, G-CSF, and SCF36 or M-CSF.37
In addition, calphostin C inhibited the cytokine-induced translocation
of PKC- to the nucleus in these cells.36 Furthermore, the EPO-induced activation of Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) in erythroid progenitor cells from fetal liver was
inhibited by the pretreatment of cells with the selective PKC inhibitor
GF109203X which also inhibited erythroid colony growth by
50%.38 Taken together, these studies demonstrated that PKC
has a role in the development of erythroid cells. However, it is still
controversial whether activation or down-regulation of PKC is required.
To establish which PKC isoform is involved in EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation, of CD34+ progenitor cells, ribozymes
designed to act against PKC- mRNA and PKC- 2 mRNA were used.
Similar to the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin C, the
PKC- ribozyme inhibited the EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of
CD34+ cells. No inhibition was observed with the PKC- 2
ribozyme. Thus, this is the first time a crucial role for PKC- in
EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
has been demonstrated. Previously, PKC- was found to be a
determining factor in the commitment of macrophages. Transfection of
murine bipotent GM-colony forming cells with a constitutively active PKC- construct, PKAC, followed by G-CSF and SCF stimulation, increased the percentage of macrophages from 0% to 40% compared with
nontransfected cells.39 Recently, Marchisio et
al40 proposed that the down-regulation of most classical
PKCs may be required for the induction of erythroid differentiation, as
a weak expression of PKC- , PKC- 1, PKC- 2, and PKC- were
observed. In their study CD34+ cells were
incubated with EPO for 9 days and then analyzed. Under these
conditions, the early changes induced by EPO were not detected. Such
early changes are known to be important in growth factor signaling.
Notably, we also observed a decrease in the cytosolic level of PKC-
and PKC- 2 after 72 hours. Furthermore, Bassini et al41
recently claimed that erythroid commitment induced by EPO does not seem
to involve PKC activation but is accompanied by the down-regulation of
specific isoforms, in particular PKC- . This was based on the
observation that a PKC- peptide that specifically inhibits
translocation of the isoform in cell lines increased the number of
erythroid colonies from CD34+ cells. However, the specific
inhibition of PKC- translocation in the CD34+ cells was
not investigated.41 It is shown in the current study that
EPO treatment of CD34+ cells down-regulates the expression
of PKC- . In contrast, a significant increase was found in the
expression and nuclear translocation of PKC- and PKC- 2 after EPO
stimulation of the CD34+ progenitor cells, providing
evidence to support the activation and nuclear signaling of PKC- and
PKC- 2 in CD34+ cells. Our data suggest that the
activation of PKC- is important for EPO-induced erythroid
differentiation of CD34+ progenitor cells from bone marrow.
In accordance with our results, Beckman et al42 found that
EPO induced rapid activation of PKC in the nuclei of erythroid
progenitor cells from murine fetal livers. Furthermore, PKC- 1 and
PKC- 2 were identified as the predominant nuclear isoforms in these
cells stimulated by EPO.43 Klingmuller et al44
suggested a role for PKC- , but not PKC- , in the EPO-induced
growth and differentiation of murine fetal liver. This was based on
their observation that 18-hour TPA treatment depleted the activity of
PKC- to basal level in spleen cells, whereas more than 44% of
PKC- activity occurred in spleen cells but did not impair
EPO-induced MAPK activity. Thus, they suggest that EPO-mediated MAPK
activation does not require PKC- but that PKC- or other PKC
isoforms may be involved.44 In contrast, we demonstrated in
the current study that TPA treatment of CD34+ cells reduced
the protein level of PKC- more than that of PKC- , indicating
different roles for the isoforms in these different progenitor cell
populations. Li et al45 show that PKC- is involved in
proliferation but that it has no influence on the differentiation of
murine erythroleukemia clones. These results suggested that the
biologic function of PKC isoforms depends on their pattern of
expression and on the cell population. However, regardless of the
precise role of PKC- on the EPO-induced erythroid differentiation of
CD34+ cells from human bone marrow, our data suggested an
important role for PKC- . Further experiments are needed to establish
the intracellular targets for PKC- in CD34+ cells.
 |
Acknowledgments |
The authors thank Lise Forfang for excellent technical assistance and
Anne Pharo for providing CD34+ cells from mobilized
peripheral blood. This work was supported by the Norwegian Cancer
Society and the Norwegian Research Council.
 |
Footnotes |
Received May 19, 1999; accepted September 20, 1999.
Reprints: June Helen Myklebust, Department of Immunology, The
Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway; e-mail: junehm{at}ulrik.uio.no.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. Therefore,
and solely to indicate this fact,
this article is hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
section 1734.
 |
References |
1.
Clark SC, Kamen R.
The human hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors.
Science.
1987;236:1229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Metcalf D.
Hematopoietic regulators: redundancy or subtlety?
Blood.
1993;82:3515[Free Full Text].
3.
Ogawa M.
Differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood.
1993;81:2844[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Krantz SB.
Erythropoietin.
Blood.
1991;77:419[Free Full Text].
5.
McNiece IK, Langley KE, Zsebo KM.
Recombinant human stem cell factor synergises with GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-3 and EPO to stimulate human progenitor cells of the myeloid and erythroid lineages.
Exp Hematol.
1991;19:226[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Muta K, Krantz SB, Bondurant MC, Wickrema A.
Distinct roles of erythropoietin, insulin-like growth factor I, and stem cell factor in the development of erythroid progenitor cells.
J Clin Invest.
1994;94:34.
7.
Egeland T, Steen R, Quarsten H, Gaudernack G, Yang YC, Thorsby E.
Myeloid differentiation of purified CD34+ cells after stimulation with recombinant human granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF), granulocyte-CSF, monocyte-CSF, and interleukin-3.
Blood.
1991;78:3192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Ulich TR, del Castillo J, McNiece IK, et al.
Stem cell factor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage CSF synergistically increases granulopoiesis in vivo.
Blood.
1991;78:1954[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.
Xu J, Arimori S, Kobayashi N, Nakamura Y, Takei M, Arahira Y.
Promotion of differentiation and proliferation of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in vitro by G-CSF.
Chin Med J (Engl).
1996;109:372[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Lardon F, Snoeck HW, Berneman ZN, et al.
Generation of dendritic cells from bone marrow progenitors using GM- CSF, TNF-alpha, and additional cytokines: antagonistic effects of IL-4 and IFN-gamma and selective involvement of TNF-alpha receptor-1.
Immunology.
1997;91:553[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Mrozek E, Anderson P, Caligiuri MA.
Role of interleukin-15 in the development of human CD56+ natural killer cells from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Blood.
1996;87:2632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.
Newton AC.
Regulation of protein kinase C.
Curr Opin Cell Biol.
1997;9:161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
13.
Liu WS, Heckman CA.
The sevenfold way of PKC regulation.
Cell Signal.
1998;10:529[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Ways DK, Dodd RC, Earp HS.
Dissimilar effects of phorbol ester and diacylglycerol derivative on protein kinase activity in the monoblastoid U937 cell.
Cancer Res.
1987;47:3344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Collins SJ.
The HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cell line: proliferation, differentiation, and cellular oncogene expression.
Blood.
1987;70:1233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.
Rossi F, McNagny M, Smith G, Frampton J, Graf T.
Lineage commitment of transformed haematopoietic progenitors is determined by the level of PKC activity.
EMBO J.
1996;15:1894[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
17.
Hong Y, Martin JF, Vainchenker W, Erusalimsky JD.
Inhibition of protein kinase C suppresses megakaryocytic differentiation and stimulates erythroid differentiation in HEL cells.
Blood.
1996;87:123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Lumelsky NL, Schwartz BS.
Protein kinase C in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation: possible role in lineage determination.
Biochim Biophys Acta.
1997;1358:79[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
19.
Patrone M, Pessino A, Passalacqua M, Sparatore B, Melloni E, Pontremoli S.
Correlation between levels of delta protein kinase C and resistance to differentiation in murine erythroleukemia cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
1996;220:26[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Pessino A, Passalacqua M, Sparatore B, Patrone M, Melloni E, Pontremoli S.
Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibition of delta protein kinase C expression accelerates induced differentiation of murine erythroleukaemia cells.
Biochem J.
1995;312:549.
21.
Patrone M, Pessino A, Passalacqua M, Sparatore B, Melloni E, Pontremoli S.
Protein kinase C isoforms in murine erythroleukemia cells and their involvement in the differentiation process.
FEBS Lett.
1994;344:91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
22.
Smeland EB, Funderud S, Kvalheim G, et al.
Isolation and characterization of human hematopoietic progenitor cells: an effective method for positive selection of CD34+ cells.
Leukemia.
1992;6:845[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
Leirdal M, Sioud M.
Ribozyme inhibition of the protein kinase C triggers apoptosis in glioma cells.
Br J Cancer.
1999;21:155.
24.
Chomczynski P, Sacchi N.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem.
1987;162:156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Panzenbock B, Bartunek P, Mapara MY, Zenke M.
Growth and differentiation of human stem cell factor/erythropoietin-dependent erythroid progenitor cells in vitro.
Blood.
1998;92:3658[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Sioud M, Natvig JB, Forre O.
Preformed ribozyme destroys tumour necrosis factor mRNA in human cells.
J Mol Biol.
1992;223:831[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
27.
Sioud M, Sorensen DR.
A nuclease-resistant protein kinase C alpha ribozyme blocks glioma cell growth.
Nat Biotechnol.
1998;16:556[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Sioud M.
Ribozyme modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by peritoneal cells in vitro and in vivo.
Eur J Immunol.
1996;26:1026[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
29.
Sioud M.
Interaction between tumour necrosis factor alpha ribozyme and cellular proteins: involvement in ribozyme stability and activity.
J Mol Biol.
1994;242:619[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Rivero JA, Adunyah SE.
Sodium butyrate stimulates PKC activation and induces differential expression of certain PKC isoforms during erythroid differentiation.
Biochem Biophys.Res Commun.
1998;248:664[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
Melloni E, Pontremoli S, Viotti PL, Patrone M, Marks PA, Rifkind RA.
Differential expression of protein kinase C isozymes and erythroleukemia cell differentiation.
J Biol Chem.
1989;264:18,414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32.
Sparatore B, Pessino A, Patrone M, Passalacqua M, Melloni E, Pontremoli S.
Role of delta-PKC on the differentiation process of murine erythroleukemia cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
1993;193:220[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
33.
Leng L, Yu F, Dong L, et al.
Differential modulation of protein kinase C isoforms in erythroleukemia during induced differentiation.
Cancer Res.
1993;53:5554[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34.
GuptaRoy B, Cohen CM.
Maturation of murine erythroleukemia cells committed to differentiation requires protein kinase C.
J Biol Chem.
1992;267:15326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35.
Davis TA, Saini AA, Blair PJ, et al.
Phorbol esters induce differentiation of human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors to dendritic cells: evidence for protein kinase C- mediated signaling.
J Immunol.
1998;160:3689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36.
Nicholls SE, Heyworth CM, Dexter TM, Lord JM, Johnson GD, Whetton AD.
IL-4 promotes macrophage development by rapidly stimulating lineage restriction of bipotent granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells.
J Immunol.
1995;155:845[Abstract].
37.
Whetton AD, Heyworth CM, Nicholls SE, et al.
Cytokine-mediated protein kinase C activation is a signal for lineage determination in bipotential granulocyte macrophage colony-forming cells.
J Cell Biol.
1994;125:651[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38.
Devemy E, Billat C, Haye B.
Activation of Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinases by erythropoietin and inositolphosphate-glycan in normal erythroid progenitor cells: involvement of protein kinase C.
Cell Signal.
1997;9:41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
39.
Pierce A, Heyworth CM, Nicholls SE, et al.
An activated protein kinase C alpha gives a differentiation signal for hematopoietic progenitor cells and mimicks macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated signaling events.
J Cell Biol.
1998;140:1511[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40.
Marchisio M, Bertagnolo V, Celeghini C, Vitale M, Capitani S, Zauli G.
Selective modulation of specific protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms in primary human megakaryocytic vs. erythroid cells.
Anat Rec.
1999;255:7[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
41.
Bassini A, Zauli G, Migliaccio G, et al.
Lineage-restricted expression of protein kinase C isoforms in hematopoiesis.
Blood.
1999;93:1178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
42.
Mason-Garcia M, Weill CL, Beckman BS.
Rapid activation by erythropoietin of protein kinase C in nuclei of erythroid progenitor cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
1990;168:490[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
43.
Mason-Garcia M, Harlan RE, Mallia C, et al.
Interleukin-3 or erythropoietin induced nuclear localization of protein kinase C beta isoforms in hematopoietic target cells.
Cell Prolif.
1995;28:145[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
44.
Klingmuller U, Wu H, Hsiao JG, et al.
Identification of a novel pathway important for proliferation and differentiation of primary erythroid progenitors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:3016[Abstract/Free Full Text].
45.
Li Y, Davis KL, Sytkowski AJ.
Protein kinase C-epsilon is necessary for erythropoietin's up-regulation of c-myc and for factor-dependent DNA synthesis: evidence for discrete signals for growth and differentiation.
J Biol Chem.
1996;271:27,025[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Redig, A. Sassano, B. Majchrzak-Kita, E. Katsoulidis, H. Liu, J. K. Altman, E. N. Fish, A. Wickrema, and L. C. Platanias
Activation of Protein Kinase C{eta} by Type I Interferons
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 17, 2009;
284(16):
10301 - 10314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Hystad, J. H. Myklebust, T. H. Bo, E. A. Sivertsen, E. Rian, L. Forfang, E. Munthe, A. Rosenwald, M. Chiorazzi, I. Jonassen, et al.
Characterization of Early Stages of Human B Cell Development by Gene Expression Profiling
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2007;
179(6):
3662 - 3671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Liu, Y. Qiu, L. Xiao, and F. Dong
Involvement of Protein Kinase C{epsilon} in the Negative Regulation of Akt Activation Stimulated by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
J. Immunol.,
February 15, 2006;
176(4):
2407 - 2413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Darley, L. Pearn, N. Omidvar, M. Sweeney, J. Fisher, S. Phillips, T. Hoy, and A. K. Burnett
Protein kinase C mediates mutant N-Ras-induced developmental abnormalities in normal human erythroid cells
Blood,
December 1, 2002;
100(12):
4185 - 4192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Neri, R. Bortul, P. Borgatti, G. Tabellini, G. Baldini, S. Capitani, and A. M. Martelli
Proliferating or Differentiating Stimuli Act on Different Lipid-dependent Signaling Pathways in Nuclei of Human Leukemia Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2002;
13(3):
947 - 964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Barnache, P. Mayeux, B. Payrastre, and F. Moreau-Gachelin
Alterations of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in the erythropoietin-independent Spi-1/PU.1 transgenic proerythroblasts
Blood,
October 15, 2001;
98(8):
2372 - 2381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. Goldfarb, D. Wong, and F. K. Racke
Induction of Megakaryocytic Differentiation in Primary Human Erythroblasts : A Physiological Basis for Leukemic Lineage Plasticity
Am. J. Pathol.,
April 1, 2001;
158(4):
1191 - 1198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Rojnuckarin and K. Kaushansky
Actin reorganization and proplatelet formation in murine megakaryocytes: the role of protein kinase C{alpha}
Blood,
January 1, 2001;
97(1):
154 - 161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Josefsen, J. H. Myklebust, J. Lømo, M. Sioud, H. K. Blomhoff, and E. B. Smeland
Differential Expression of Bcl-2 Homologs in Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Induced to Differentiate into Erythroid or Granulocytic Cells
Stem Cells,
July 1, 2000;
18(4):
261 - 272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. K. Racke, D. Wang, Z. Zaidi, J. Kelley, J. Visvader, J.-W. Soh, and A. N. Goldfarb
A Potential Role for Protein Kinase C-epsilon in Regulating Megakaryocytic Lineage Commitment
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 5, 2001;
276(1):
522 - 528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. von Lindern, M. P.-v. Amelsvoort, T. van Dijk, E. Deiner, E. van den Akker, S. van Emst-de Vries, P. Willems, H. Beug, and B. Lowenberg
Protein Kinase C alpha Controls Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 27, 2000;
275(44):
34719 - 34727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|