| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, Vol. 95 No. 4 (February 15), 2000:
pp. 1386-1392
IMMUNOBIOLOGY
From the Department of Immunology and Genito-Urinary Medicine and
Communicable Diseases, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's
Campus, London, United Kingdom; Department of Infectious Disease and
Immunology, Okinawa-Asia Research Center of Medical Science, Faculty of
Medicine, University of The Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan; and
Department of Medical Informatics and Third Department of Internal
Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
The role of the cellular immune response in human T-cell leukemia
virus type I (HTLV-I) infection is not fully understood. A persistently
activated cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response to HTLV-I is found in
the majority of infected individuals. However, it remains unclear
whether this CTL response is protective or causes tissue damage. In
addition, several observations paradoxically suggest that HTLV-I is
transcriptionally silent in most infected cells and, therefore, not
detectable by virus-specific CTLs. With the use of a new flow
cytometric procedure, we show here that a high proportion of naturally
infected CD4+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (between 10%
and 80%) are capable of expressing Tax, the immunodominant target
antigen recognized by virus-specific CTLs. Furthermore, we provide
direct evidence that autologous CD8+ T cells rapidly kill CD4+
cells naturally infected with HTLV-I and expressing Tax in vitro by a
perforin-dependent mechanism. Consistent with these observations, we
observed a significant negative correlation between the frequency of
Tax11-19-specific CD8+ T cells and the percentage of
CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood of patients infected with HTLV-I.
Those results are in accordance with the view that virus-specific CTLs
participate in a highly efficient immune surveillance mechanism that
persistently destroys Tax-expressing HTLV-I-infected CD4+ T cells in vivo.
(Blood. 2000;95:1386-1392)
Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I), which
belongs to the HTLV-BLV subfamily of retroviruses, infects an estimated 10 million people worldwide.1 Unlike human immunodeficiency virus, HTLV-I causes no disease in a majority of infected subjects (asymptomatic carriers). However, approximately 2%-3% develop an
aggressive T-cell malignancy, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, and
another 2%-3% develop a disabling chronic inflammatory disease, involving the central nervous system (HTLV-I-associated
myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis; HAM/TSP), the eyes, the lungs,
or the skeletal muscles.2
HTLV-I shares with other retroviruses the three main genomic regions of
gag, pol, and env, but, unlike most leukemia
viruses, it has an additional region called pX that codes for
two transcriptional regulatory proteins, the Tax and Rex
proteins.2 These proteins are the homologues
of the Tat and Rev proteins of human immunodeficiency virus.3 The Rex protein stabilizes viral messenger RNAs
(mRNAs) and regulates their splicing and transport. The Tax protein is of central importance in virus dynamics because, as well as
transactivating viral transcription, it is thought to drive host-cell
proliferation.2 Furthermore, Tax is the dominant target
antigen recognized by HTLV-I-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in
most responding individuals.4-8 Thus, the Tax protein is at
the center of both efficient HTLV-I replication and the host attack on
the virus.
The risk of HAM/TSP disease is positively correlated with the magnitude
of the proviral load in the blood.9 It is, therefore, important to identify the host factors that determine the magnitude of
the proviral load in vivo. In this regard, the role of the immune
response in HTLV-I infection is still not clear. A high frequency of
circulating Tax-specific CTLs can be found in a majority of
HTLV-I-infected individuals.4-8 However, controversy exists over whether this strong CTL response causes or prevents
HAM/TSP.10,11 Our recent immunogenetic data favor the
possibility that a strong HTLV-I-specific CTL response indeed reduces
proviral load and protects against HAM/TSP.12 However,
direct evidence that Tax-specific CTLs are able to eliminate
HTLV-I-infected cells in vivo has not been obtained. In addition, if
HTLV-I-specific CTLs play a role in the reduction of the proviral load,
a large proportion of infected cells should be capable of expressing at
least the Tax protein, the dominant target antigen recognized by CTLs.
This interpretation seems to conflict with the observation that HTLV-I
provirus is transcriptionally silent in a high proportion of T-cell
clones derived from infected patients,13,14 which suggests
that HTLV-I might be latent in most infected peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in vivo. Consistent with this observation,
with the use of conventional techniques, Tax protein expression cannot be detected in freshly isolated PBMCs, and, indeed, the existence of a
serum factor that represses HTLV-I transcription in vivo has been
postulated.15,16 However, the low frequency of Tax expression in fresh PBMCs could be the consequence of an efficient immune surveillance mechanism mediated by the host cellular immune response.11,12 Therefore, to understand the role of
HTLV-I-specific CTLs in vivo, it is necessary to determine the
proportion of infected PBMCs that are capable of expressing at least
the Tax protein and to characterize qualitatively and quantitatively
their interactions with autologous HTLV-I-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes.
To date, HTLV-I-specific CTLs have been characterized, using as target
cells either leukemic cells4 or transformed cell line
treated with peptides or infected with recombinant
viruses.6,7,17 In this study, we used a sensitive flow
cytometric technique to study intracellular Tax protein expression in
naturally infected PBMCs18 of patients with HAM and
asymptomatic carriers of HTLV-I. Our observations suggest that
Tax-specific CTLs play an important role in reducing the frequency of
Tax-expressing CD4+ T lymphocytes in vivo.
Patients and cells
Immunofluorescence
Concomitant detection of Tax, CD4, and CD45RO.
After being harvested, cells were fixed in PBS containing 2%
paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 20 minutes and resuspended in PBS at
4°C until use. Fixed cells were washed with PBS containing 7% of
normal goat serum (Sigma) and incubated with PC5-labeled anti-CD4 and
FITC-labeled anti-CD45RO monoclonal antibodies (MAb) (Beckman Coulter, Bedfordshire, UK) for 15 minutes at room temperature. The cells were then washed and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1%
Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Permeabilized
cells were washed and resuspended in PBS/7% normal goat serum
containing an anti-Tax MAb (Lt-4)19 or an isotype control
MAb (IgG3) (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) for 20 minutes at room temperature. The cells were then washed twice and resuspended in PBS/7% normal goat serum containing
FITC-labeled goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse IgG3
serum (Southern Biotechnology Associates) for 20 minutes at room
temperature. Finally, the cells were washed twice and analyzed by flow
cytometry on a Coulter EPICS® XL (Beckman Coulter).
Concomitant detection of Tax and p24 (HTLV-I gag antigen).
The cells were processed as described above, but an anti-p24 MAb
(MAB8817: IgG1) (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) was used in addition to the Lt-4 MAb. The anti-p24 MAb was then detected with a RPE-labeled goat F(ab')2 anti-mouse
IgG1 serum (Southern Biotechnology Associates).
Concomitant detection of Tax and cell mortality.
After being harvested, the cells were incubated for 10 minutes in the
presence of 5 µg/mL of propidium iodide (Sigma), then washed twice
with PBS, fixed in PBS containing 2% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes,
and resuspended in PBS at 4°C until use. Fixed cells were then
washed with PBS/7% normal goat serum and processed as described above
to detect the Tax protein.
Quantification of tax mRNA
Quantification of proviral load To measure the proviral load, DNA was extracted from 2 × 106 PBMCs by the proteinase K method. Replicate serial dilutions of the DNA were amplified with the use of a nested PCR technique that reliably detected a single copy of HTLV-I Tax proviral DNA in DNA from 105 cells.20 The proviral DNA titer was calculated from the Poisson distribution of negative samples at the cut-off dilution. Interassay variability (0.3 log10) was determined by repeated testing of a random selection of patient samples.Detection of Tax11-19-specific CTL and CD4+ cells In the chronically activated CTL response to HTLV-I, several peptides derived from the immunodominant Tax protein are restricted by HLA*A02.17 Tax11-19 is a dominant A*02-restricted epitope.4 Analysis of PBMCs for the presence of Tax11-19-specific CTLs was, therefore, performed by the use of fluorescent-labeled tetramers of HLA-A*0201 + 2microglobulin + Tax11-19
peptide.12,21 PBMCs were incubated with
Tax11-19 tetramer at 37°C for 30 minutes and anti-CD4 antibody on ice for 30 minutes. The cells were then washed three times
in ice-cold PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes at
4°C, and analyzed by flow cytometry on a Coulter EPICS® XL (Beckman Coulter).
Tax protein expression in PBMCs isolated from infected patients We devised a sensitive flow cytometric assay to detect intracellular Tax protein expression. Preliminary experiments were done with the use of the MT-2 cell line, which is chronically infected with HTLV-I. Those experiments indicated that 98% of MT-2 cells expressed high levels of the Tax protein (data not shown). We next checked whether this new procedure could detect the expression of Tax in PBMCs isolated from patients infected with HTLV-I. PBMCs were isolated from blood samples and harvested directly or after 24 hours in vitro culture (in the absence of interleukin-2 or mitogen). After being harvested, cell samples were fixed and processed to detect concomitantly Tax and CD4 expression by flow cytometry. Figure 1 shows that a small fraction of CD4+ lymphocytes express detectable levels of the Tax protein after 24 hours of cultivation. In contrast, no expression of Tax was observed in freshly isolated PBMCs (Figure 1). The use of an isotype control MAb (Figure 1) confirmed the specificity of the detection. Moreover, uninfected PBMCs cultivated in similar conditions for 24 hours remained negative for Tax expression (data not shown). Three-color analysis indicated that Tax-expressing CD4+ lymphocytes were also positive for the CD45RO differentiation antigen (Figure 2). This result is in accordance with Richardson et al18 who observed a similar phenotype of HTLV-I-infected cells in vivo. In addition, we assayed PBMCs for the concomitant expression of Tax and p24 (HTLV-I Gag antigen) after in vitro cultivation for 24 hours. Because Tax is a powerful transactivator of viral transcription, Tax-positive cells should express other viral proteins, including p24. The analysis confirmed that a large proportion (51%) of Tax-positive PBMCs also expressed the p24 protein after culture for 24 hours. In contrast, only 1.9% of Tax-negative PBMCs were positive for the p24 protein.
Time course study of Tax expression in PBMCs isolated from infected patients The time course of Tax expression was determined in PBMCs isolated from both asymptomatic carriers and patients with HAM/TSP. PBMCs were cultivated for various times, harvested, and then processed to detect concomitantly Tax and CD4 expression by flow cytometry. Figure 3A and Table 1 show the evolution of the percentage of Tax-positive PBMCs at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Tax expression reaches a maximum at 6-12 hours and then decreases by 50% during the next 12-36 hours. In contrast to Tax expression, the percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes remained constant throughout the time course (data not shown). This constant percentage indicates that the observed changes in Tax expression over the time could not be due to a dramatic change in the proportion of the different PBMC subpopulations. In each patient, the comparison of Tax positivity with the proviral load indicated that a large fraction (from 10% to 80%) of infected cells were able to express the Tax protein at a given time point (Table 1).
Presence of CD8+ lymphocytes decreases the frequency
of Tax expression
Effect of CD8+ lymphocytes on the frequency of Tax
expression in autologous or heterologous CD4+ lymphocytes
CD8+ lymphocytes kill Tax-expressing cells by a perforin-dependent
mechanism
Frequency of Tax11-19-specific CD8+ T cells
is negatively correlated with the percentage of CD4+ T cells
in peripheral blood
The role of the cellular immune response in HTLV-I infection is not
fully understood. A persistently activated CTL response to HTLV-I is
found in the majority of infected individuals.4-8 However,
several observations paradoxically suggest that HTLV-I is
transcriptionally silent in most infected cells13,14 and, therefore, not detectable by virus-specific CTLs.
We thank the staff members and blood donors of the Kagoshima Red Cross
Blood Center and of St. Mary's Hospital. The authors would like to
thank Rebecca Asquith for helpful comments on the manuscript. E. Hanon
is a senior research assistant of the Fonds National Belge de la
Recherche Scientifique (F.N.R.S.).
Submitted August 25, 1999; accepted October 18, 1999.
Supported by the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health
Sciences of the Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research
(OPSR) (Japan), the Wellcome Trust (UK), the Royal Society (UK), and
the Fords National Belge de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium).
Reprints: Charles Bangham, Department of Immunology, Imperial
College School of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, W21PG,
London, United Kingdom; e-mail: c.bangham{at}ic.ac.uk.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. Therefore,
and solely to indicate this fact,
this article is hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
section 1734.
1.
de Thé G, Bomford R.
An HTLV-I vaccine: why, how, for whom?
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses.
1993;9:381[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Uchiyama T.
Human T cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) and human diseases.
Annu Rev Immunol.
1997;15:15[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Cullen BR.
Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus replication.
Annu Rev Microbiol.
1991;45:219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Kannagi M, Shida H, Igarashi H, et al.
Target epitope in the Tax protein of human T-cell leukemia virus type I recognized by class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic T cells.
J Virol.
1992;66:2928
5.
Jacobson S, Shida H, McFarlin DE, Fauci AS, Koenig S.
Circulating CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for HTLV-I pX in patients with HTLV-I associated neurological disease.
Nature.
1990;348:245[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Parker CE, Daenke S, Nightingale S, Bangham CR.
Activated, HTLV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes are found in healthy seropositives as well as in patients with tropical spastic paraparesis.
Virology.
1992;188:628[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
7.
Parker CE, Nightingale S, Taylor GP, Weber J, Bangham CR.
Circulating anti-Tax cytotoxic T lymphocytes from human T-cell leukemia virus type I-infected people, with and without tropical spastic paraparesis, recognize multiple epitopes simultaneously.
J Virol.
1994;68:2860
8.
Bieganowska K, Hollsberg P, Buckle GJ, et al.
Direct analysis of viral-specific CD8+ T cells with soluble HLA- A2/Tax11-19 tetramer complexes in patients with human T cell lymphotropic virus-associated myelopathy.
J Immunol.
1999;162:1765
9.
Nagai M, Usuku K, Matsumoto W, et al.
Analysis of HTLV-I proviral load in 202 HAM/TSP patients and 243 asymptomatic HTLV-I carriers: high proviral load strongly predisposes to HAM/TSP.
J Neurovirol.
1998;4:586[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Hollsberg P.
Mechanisms of T-cell activation by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.
1999;63:308
11.
Bangham CR, Hall SE, Jeffery KJ, et al.
Genetic control and dynamics of the cellular immune response to the human T-cell leukaemia virus, HTLV-I.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.
1999;354:691[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
12.
Jeffery KJ, Usuku K, Hall SE, et al.
HLA alleles determine human T-lymphotropic virus-I (HTLV-I) proviral load and the risk of HTLV-I-associated myelopathy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:3848
13.
Richardson JH, Hollsberg P, Windhagen A, Child LA, Hafler DA, Lever AM.
Variable immortalizing potential and frequent virus latency in blood-derived T-cell clones infected with human T-cell leukemia virus type I.
Blood.
1997;89:3303
14.
Moritoyo T, Izumo S, Moritoyo H, et al.
Detection of human T-lymphotropic virus type I p40tax protein in cerebrospinal fluid cells from patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis.
J Neurovirol.
1999;5:241[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
15.
Tochikura T, Iwahashi M, Matsumoto T, Koyanagi Y, Hinuma Y, Yamamoto N.
Effect of human serum anti-HTLV antibodies on viral antigen induction in vitro cultured peripheral lymphocytes from adult T-cell leukemia patients and healthy virus carriers.
Int J Cancer.
1985;36:1[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Minato S, Itoyama Y, Goto I, Yamamoto N.
Expression of HTLV-I antigen in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with HTLV-I associated myelopathy.
J Neurol Sci.
1988;87:233[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
17.
Daenke S, Kermode AG, Hall SE, et al.
High activated and memory cytotoxic T-cell responses to HTLV-1 in healthy carriers and patients with tropical spastic paraparesis.
Virology.
1996;217:139[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
18.
Richardson JH, Edwards AJ, Cruickshank JK, Rudge P, Dalgleish AG.
In vivo cellular tropism of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1.
J Virol.
1990;64:5682
19.
Lee B, Tanaka Y, Tozawa H.
Monoclonal antibody defining tax protein of human T-cell leukemia virus type-I.
Tohoku J Exp Med.
1989;157:1[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Tosswill JH, Taylor GP, Clewley JP, Weber JN.
Quantification of proviral DNA load in human T-cell leukaemia virus type I infections.
J Virol Methods.
1998;75:21[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Altman JD, Moss PH, Goulder PR, et al.
Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes.
Science.
1996;274:94
22.
Zinkernagel RM, Doherty PC.
Restriction of in vitro T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in lymphocytic choriomeningitis within a syngeneic or semiallogeneic system.
Nature.
1974;248:701[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
Kataoka T, Shinohara N, Takayama H, et al.
Concanamycin A, a powerful tool for characterization and estimation of contribution of perforin- and Fas-based lytic pathways in cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
J Immunol.
1996;156:3678[Abstract].
24.
Gessain A, Louie A, Gout O, Gallo RC, Franchini G.
Human T-cell leukemia-lymphoma virus type I (HTLV-I) expression in fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-I-associated myelopathy.
J Virol.
1991;65:1628
25.
Kinoshita T, Shimoyama M, Tobinai K, et al.
Detection of mRNA for the tax1/rex1 gene of human T-cell leukemia virus type I in fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells of adult T-cell leukemia patients and viral carriers by using the polymerase chain reaction.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1989;86:5620
26.
Umadome H, Uchiyama T, Hori T, et al.
Close association between interleukin 2 receptor mRNA expression and human T cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type I viral RNA expression in short-term cultured leukemic cells from adult T cell leukemia patients.
J Clin Invest.
1988;81:52.
27.
Moskophidis D, Battegay M, van den Broek M, Laine E, Hoffmann-Rohrer U, Zinkernagel RM.
Role of virus and host variables in virus persistence or immunopathological disease caused by a non-cytolytic virus.
J Gen Virol.
1995;76:381
28.
Moskophidis D, Kioussis D.
Contribution of virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to virus clearance or pathologic manifestations of influenza virus infection in a T cell receptor transgenic mouse model.
J Exp Med.
1998;188:223
29.
Umehara F, Izumo S, Nakagawa M, et al.
Immunocytochemical analysis of the cellular infiltrate in the spinal cord lesions in HTLV-I-associated myelopathy.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.
1993;52:424[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Umehara F, Nakamura A, Izumo S, et al.
Apoptosis of T lymphocytes in the spinal cord lesions in HTLV-I-associated myelopathy: a possible mechanism to control viral infection in the central nervous system.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.
1994;53:617[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
Moritoyo T, Reinhart TA, Moritoyo H, et al.
Human T-lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy and tax gene expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes.
Ann Neurol.
1996;40:84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
32.
Kubota R, Kawanishi T, Matsubara H, Manns A, Jacobson S.
Demonstration of human T lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) tax-specific CD8+ lymphocytes directly in peripheral blood of HTLV-I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis patients by intracellular cytokine detection.
J Immunol.
1998;161:482 |