| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, Vol. 96 No. 2 (July 15), 2000:
pp. 498-505
HEMATOPOIESIS
From the Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Erasmus
University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gap junctions (GJs) provide for a unique system of intercellular
communication (IC) allowing rapid transport of small molecules from
cell to cell. GJs are formed by a large family of proteins named
connexins (Cxs). Cx43 has been considered as the predominantly expressed Cx by hematopoietic-supporting stroma. To investigate the
role of the Cx family in hemopoiesis, we analyzed the expression of 11 different Cx species in different stromal cell lines derived from
murine bone marrow (BM) or fetal liver (FL). We found that up to 5 Cxs
are expressed in FL stromal cells (Cx43, Cx45, Cx30.3, Cx31, and
Cx31.1), whereas only Cx43, Cx45, and Cx31 were clearly detectable in
BM stromal cells. In vivo, the Cx43-deficient 14.5- to 15-day FL
cobblestone area-forming cells (CAFC)-week 1-4 and colony-forming unit
contents were 26%-38% and 39%-47% lower than in their wild-type
counterparts, respectively. The reintroduction of the Cx43 gene into
Cx43-deficient FL stromal cells was able to restore their diminished IC
to the level of the wild-type FL stromal cells. In addition, these
Cx43-reintroduced stromal cells showed an increased support ability
(3.7-fold) for CAFC-week 1 in normal mouse BM and 5-fold higher
supportive ability for CAFC-week 4 in 5-fluorouracil-treated BM cells
as compared with Cx43-deficient FL stromal cells. These findings
suggest that stromal Cx43-mediated IC, although not responsible for all
GJ-mediated IC of stromal cells, plays a role in the supportive ability
for hemopoietic progenitors and stem cells.
(Blood. 2000;96:498-505)
Mature blood cells are derived from undifferentiated
stem and progenitor cells in a highly complex series of maturational and divisional steps that occur in different tissues during embryonic development. The microenvironment seems to be an important factor influencing the proliferative activity and differentiation process of
the stem and progenitor cells by local positive and negative signaling
to the target cells.1 The following 3 mechanisms can be
assumed to mediate the regulation of proliferation and differentiation
of hematopoietic stem cells by stromal cells2: (a)
by cytokine receptor-ligand interaction, (b) by interaction of
adhesion molecules on hemopoietic cells with stromal cells or the
extracellular matrix, or (c) by direct cell-to-cell
communication between stromal cells or between stromal cells and
hemopoietic cells.
Very little is known about the regulatory mechanisms of direct
cell-to-cell communication in the hematopoietic microenvironment. Intercellular gap junctions (GJs) represent the most well-known intercellular communication (IC) system, and they are characterized by
the existence of plaques of narrow channels between contacting cells.
Each channel is formed by 2 hemichannels or hemiconnexons, and each one
of them is contributed by 1 of the 2 adjacent cells. A hemiconnexon is
an oligomeric assembly of 6 polypeptide subunits, or connexins (Cxs).
Different tissue-specific Cxs have been characterized and
cloned.3 These proteins are highly homologous and encoded by at least 4 gene subfamilies ( There are few reports analyzing the GJs in hematopoietic tissues. By
analysis of lucifer yellow (LY) dye transfer in a
hemopoiesis-supporting bone marrow (BM) stromal cell line, Dorshkind et
al7 showed the presence of Cx43-type GJ-IC that was
inhibited by interleukin-1. Rosendaal et al8 reported on
the basis of immunohistological studies that, in adult mouse BM, the
Cx43 GJ epitopes are rare but up-regulated 80- to 100-fold in the
marrow of the neonate or after forced stem cell division (by
administering 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] or irradiation). This
up-regulation occurred soon after the insult, before recognizable blood
cells formed, and around the time at which primitive stem cells were
triggered to go into cycle, suggesting the presence of a latent network
of GJs in normal hemopoietic tissues. Our group9 has
previously reported that the global blockade of all GJ-IC by
amphotericin B reversibly inhibited the cobblestone area (CA) formation
and hemopoiesis in stroma-containing cultures.
Strong evidence supports that more than 1 Cx gene is expressed in many
specific tissues or cells. This fact suggests that different GJ
proteins are allowing the permeability of different molecules. In
osteoblasts10,11 and in fetal fibroblasts,12 it
has been shown that different GJ proteins create channels with different conductance properties. This finding could suggest that their
regulatory cell functions might also differ among them.
We conducted our efforts to study whether other Cxs, in addition to
Cx43, are expressed by hemopoiesis-supporting stromal cells and whether
stromal Cx43-dependent GJ-IC may influence hemopoiesis in vivo and in
vitro in stroma-supported long-term culture.
Fetal liver and BM cells obtention
Stromal cell lines
Reintroduction of the Cx43 gene into Cx43-KO FL-derived stromal cells We used the packaging cell line PA317/pBABECx43a (kindly provided by Dr Warn-Cramer and Dr Lau, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI) because of its ability to reintroduce the Cx43 gene into mouse Cx43-deficient fibroblasts.12 The vector inserted in this cell line is the pBABECx43a, composed of the fragment G2 of the rat Cx43 gene as reported by Beyer et al,17 preceded by a 5'-LTR and a gag region and followed by a SV40 promoter that regulates the expression of the puromycin resistance gene. The cell line PA317/pBABECx43a was grown at 37°C, 5% CO2 in IMDM supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 7 µg/mL puromycin (Sigma) until 80% confluency. At that time, medium was changed for stromal cell medium with no puromycin. After 24 hours, supernatant was harvested and passed through a 0.45-µm mesh filter. Filtered retroviral supernatant was added to 10%-20% confluent passage 14 Cx43-KO FL stromal cells. Three successive daily incubations were performed in the same way until target cells reached 90% confluency. Thirty-six hours after starting the last cycle of incubation of target cells with the retroviral supernatant, medium was changed for stromal cell medium containing 7-10 µg/mL puromycin. Two cell lines were developed: FLB6-3 and FLB6-4 (Cx43+ cell lines). Transduced cells were passed for 7 additional passages to passage 21 with medium containing puromycin to maintain the transduced cells.Calcein dye transfer among stromal cells Calcein dye coupling of stromal cells was analyzed according to Ziambaras et al,18 with some modifications. Confluent stromal cells were trypsinized and incubated with 5 µmol/L calcein-AM (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Cells were washed for 4 times in Ca++/Mg2+-containing Hanks balanced salted solution and passed through a 70-µm mesh filter. After that, 50 cells (in 0.5 mL stromal medium) were cocultured in each of 3 2-cm2 wells containing a pregrown homocellular confluent layer of stromal cells (around 40 000 cells per well). Wells were examined after 2 hours of coculture under an inverted fluorescent microscope. A positive event of GJ-IC was considered when a cluster of 2 or more neighboring cells was observed. A negative communicating event was considered when a single fluorescent cell was seen. The percentage of positive events and the number of fluorescent cells per cluster was recorded. Control incubation of stromal cells with 5 µmol/L calcein did not produce similar clusters, and it only increased background fluorescence in peripheral cells close to the edge of the well.Immunofluorescence analysis for Cx proteins Stromal cells were plated in culture chambers (Lab-Tek, Chamber Slide, Nunc, Naperville, IL) and grown overnight in stromal cell medium. After harvesting medium, slides were washed with PBS twice and fixed in ice-cold methanol for 30 minutes. After fixation, cells were permeabilized in 1% Triton-X-100, washed with PBS, and then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in PBS/10% mouse serum containing the polyclonal rabbit antiserum directed against Cx4317 (1:70; Zymed, South San Francisco, CA), Cx4519 (1:150; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA), and Cx3120 (1:150; a small aliquot was kindly provided by Prof K. Willecke, University of Bonn, Germany). All of the antisera are able to recognize specific intracellular carboxy-terminal domains of the mentioned Cx proteins. After washing the slides, they were incubated with goat anti-rabbit FITC conjugate (Sigma) for 1 hour in the dark. After additional washing steps, the slides were mounted in Vectashield medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and visualized by epifluorescence light microscopy.Western blot assay for membrane-bound Cx43 expression Flasks containing confluent cells were briefly rinsed with cold calcium/magnesium-free PBS and then lysed directly by addition of ice-cold alkaline buffer, containing 2 mmol/L NaHCO3, 20 mmol/L NaOH, 5 mmol/L EDTA and protease inhibitor Complete (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. The lysate was sheared by serial passage through a 25-gauge needle and further homogenized by serial cycles of freezing and thawing. Protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The insoluble fragments enriched for membrane-bound Cx43 were collected after centrifugation for 60 minutes at 55 000 rpm at 4°C, resuspended in Laemmli buffer, and stored at 20°C until use.
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR Monolayer confluent cell lines were lysed with Trizol (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm as previously described.21 RNAse inhibitor (120 IU) was added per 10 µg RNA, and RNAs were frozen at 80°C
until use. In our experience, contaminating genomic DNA was still
present in most samples. For that reason, we used a technique based on the use of Mn2+-DNAse to degrade contaminating genomic
DNA,22 with some modifications. Briefly, a first 30-minute
incubation of 10 µg of total RNA dissolved in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl pH
8.3, 75 mmol/L KCl, 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L
MnCl2, 50 pg rabbit -globin messenger RNA (mRNA; 90%
purity; Gibco BRL) as an internal standard, and 5 IU RNAse-free DNAse I
(Boehringer Mannheim) (total volume, 20 µL) was performed at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by heating at 70°C for 10 minutes, and the mix was split into 2 ( RT and +RT) tubes. A
10-µL solution containing oligo(dT)12-18 as a random
primer (Pharmacia Biotech; final concentration: 100 µmol/L),
dithiothreitol (Life Technologies; final concentration: 10 mmol/L), and
each of the 4 dNTPs (Pharmacia Biotech; final concentration of each:
125 µmol/L) diluted in the same RT buffer were added. After 5 additional minutes at 72°C, 5 IU RT SuperScript Rnase
H (Gibco BRL) was exclusively added to the +RT
tubes. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C during 90 minutes and at 92°C during 10 minutes for enzyme inactivation.
Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were used immediately or kept at
80°C until use.
Cobblestone area-forming cell assay Cobblestone area-forming cell (CAFC) frequency analysis was performed as described previously.24 Stromal layers were prepared using the FBMD-1,15 Cx43
(FLB6-2), and Cx43+ (FLB6-3 and FLB6-4) FL stromal cell
lines. FBMD-1 cells were used between passages 16 and 20, FLB6-2 cells
were used at passage 21, and the Cx43+ cell lines at
passage +7 after the transduction (final passage 21). Flat-bottom
96-well plates (Falcon, Lincoln Park, NJ) were inoculated with
103 stromal cells per well from logarithmic phase cultures.
Culture plastics destined for establishment of stromal feeders were
incubated at 4°C overnight with 0.3% porcine gelatin (Sigma) in
Milli-Q water to improve adherence of the stromal layer for up to 6 weeks. Except for the FBMD-1 cell line, the cell lines were irradiated to prevent overgrowth of the cells after reaching confluency. It has
been demonstrated previously that BM stromal cell gap-junctional communication is resistant to irradiation in vitro.25 FL
stromal cells were irradiated at 40 Gy delivered by a 137Cs
source (Gammacell, Atomic Energy of Canada, Ottawa, Canada), 18-24 hours before inoculation. Suspensions of normal BM cells were overlaid
on these stromal layers in 12 dilutions, 2-fold apart, consisting of 15 wells per dilution to allow limiting dilution analysis of the precursor
cells forming hemopoietic clones under the stromal layer. Cultures were
fed weekly by changing half of the medium and frequencies of CAFC
determined at weekly intervals (CAFC-week 1 to CAFC-week 6). Wells were
scored positive if at least one phase-dark hematopoietic clone (CA,
containing 5 or more cells) was seen. The frequency of CAFC was then
calculated by using Poisson statistics as described
previously.2,6
Colony-forming cell assay FL cells (5 × 104 and 105) were plated for quantification of colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E) in a semisolid (0.88% methylcellulose; Methocel, Stade, Germany) culture medium (CellGro SCGM, Boehringer Ingelheim Bioproducts, Heidelberg, Germany). The erythroid cultures contained 30% FCS, 10% hemin (Sigma), 10 U/mL rh-erythropoietin (Jansen-Cilag, Tilburg, The Netherlands), and 50 ng/mL rm-SCF (kindly provided by Genetics Institute, Cambridge, MA). Colonies were scored after 10 days of culture at 37°C and 10% CO2.Statistical analysis Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation except when otherwise stated. Baseline comparisons used Mann-Whitney U test for 2 independent samples, Kruskal-Wallis test for 3 or more independent samples, or Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data. Statistical significance threshold was established at P < .05.
Cx gene expression To characterize the Cx species expressed by stromal cells, we analyzed 4 BM-derived and 4 FL-derived cell lines able to support hemopoiesis in vitro. Of 11 Cx genes that we analyzed for mRNA transcription by RT-PCR, the expression of Cx26, Cx32, Cx37, Cx40, Cx46, and Cx50 was undetectable.
Calcein-dye transfer in BM and FL cell lines
Content of CAFC and CFU in FL from Cx43-wt and Cx43-KO FL
Effect of stromal Cx43 expression on their hemopoietic support
ability
The existence of GJ-like structures in hemopoietic tissues has been
known for 20 years.28-30 It is known that GJ-IC can only be
achieved by the expression of compatible Cxs.31 The
existence of functional heteromeric channels (different Cxs within the
same hemiconnexon) in different tissues32-34 and the unique
ionic and size selectivities that are determined by each combination of Cxs35 make IC highly specific and regulated. Although some
Cx mutations are associated with human
diseases3,6 and eight different KO models in
rodents have been described,13,36-41 no hematological
impairment has been reported related to a defect in one single Cx gene.
We show here that various Cxs are expressed by hemopoietic tissues and
that the deletion of the Cx43 gene leads to measurable hemopoietic
defects in vivo and in vitro.
Submitted August 23, 1999; accepted March 13, 2000.
Supported by a fellowship grant (J.A.C.) from Fundacion Areces, Madrid, Spain.
Reprints: Rob E. Ploemacher, Dept of Hematology, Faculty of
Medicine, Erasmus University, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE
Rotterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: ploemacher{at}hema.fgg.eur.nl.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. Therefore,
and solely to indicate this fact,
this article is hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
section 1734.
1.
Williams DA.
Stem cell model of hematopoiesis. In:
Hoffman R,et al., eds.
Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:180.
2.
Long MW.
Blood cell cytoadhesion molecules.
Exp Hematol.
1992;20:288-301[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Kumar NM, Gilula NB.
The gap junction communication channel.
Cell.
1996;84:381-388[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL.
Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication.
Annu Rev Biochem.
1996;65:475-502[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Sohl G, Degen J, Teubner B, Willecke K.
The murine gap junction gene connexin36 is highly expressed in mouse retina and regulated during brain development.
FEBS Lett.
1998;428:27-31[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Spray DC.
Gap junctions proteins: where they live and how they die.
Circ Res.
1998;83:679-681
7.
Dorshkind K, Green L, Godwin A, Fletcher WH.
Connexin-43-type gap junctions mediate communication between bone marrow stromal cells.
Blood.
1993;82:38-45
8.
Rosendaal M, Green CR, Rahman A, Morgan D.
Up-regulation of the connexin43+ gap junction network in haemopoietic tissue before the growth of stem cells.
J Cell Sci.
1994;107:29-37[Abstract].
9.
Rosendaal M, Mayen A, de Koning A, Dunina-Barkovskaya T, Krenacs T, Ploemacher R.
Does transmembrane communication through gap junctions enable stem cells to overcome stromal inhibition?
Leukemia.
1997;11:1281-1289[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Steinberg TH, Civitelli R, Geist ST, et al.
Connexin43 and connexin45 form gap junctions with different molecular permeabilities in osteoblastic cells.
EMBO J.
1994;13:744-750[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Koval M, Geist ST, Westphale EM, et al.
Transfected connexin45 alters gap junction permeability in cells expressing endogenous connexin43.
J Cell Biol.
1995;130:987-995
12.
Martyn KD, Kurata WE, Warn-Cramer BJ, Burt JM, TenBroek E, Lau AF.
Immortalized connexin43 knockout cell lines display a subset of biological properties associated with the transformed phenotype.
Cell Growth Differ.
1997;8:1015-1027[Abstract].
13.
Reaume AG, de Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, et al.
Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin 43.
Science.
1995;267:1831-1834
14.
Slieker WA, van der Loo JC, de Rijk-de Bruijn MF, Godrey DI, Leenen PJM, van Ewijk W.
ER-MP12 antigen, a new cell surface marker on mouse bone marrow cells with thymus-repopulating ability. II. Thymus-homing ability and phenotypic characterization of ER-MP12-positive bone marrow cells.
Int Immunol.
1993;5:1099-1107
15.
Breems DA, Blokland EA, Neben S, Ploemacher RE.
Frequency analysis of human primitive haematopoietic stem cell subsets using a cobblestone area forming cell assay.
Leukemia.
1994;8:1095-1104[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Ya J, Erdtsieck-Ernste EB, de Boer PA, et al.
Heart defects in connexin43-deficient mice.
Circ Res.
1998;82:360-366
17.
Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA.
Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver.
J Cell Biol.
1987;105:2621-2629
18.
Ziambaras K, Lecanda F, Steinberg TH, Civitelli R.
Cyclic stretch enhances gap junctional communication between osteoblastic cells.
J Bone Miner Res.
1998;13:218-228[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
19.
Hennemann H, Schwarz HJ, Willecke K.
Characterization of gap junction genes expressed in F9 embryonic carcinoma cells: molecular cloning of mouse connexin31 and -45 cDNAs.
Eur J Cell Biol.
1992;57:51-58[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Butterweck A, Elfgang C, Willecke K, Traub O.
Differential expression of the gap junction proteins connexin45, -43, -40, -31, and -26 in mouse skin.
Eur J Cell Biol.
1994;65:152-163[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T.
Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Plainview, N Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
22.
Fiorenza MT, Mangia F.
Quantitative RT-PCR amplification of RNA in single mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos.
Biotechniques.
1998;24:618-623[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
Davies TC, Barr KJ, Jones DH, Zhu D, Kidder GM.
Multiple members of the connexin gene family participate in preimplantation development of the mouse.
Dev Genet.
1996;18:234-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
24.
Ploemacher RE, van der Sluijs JP, Voerman JS, Brons NH.
An in vitro limiting-dilution assay of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse.
Blood.
1989;74:2755-2763
25.
Umezawa A, Harigaya K, Abe H, Watanabe Y.
Gap-junctional communication of bone marrow stromal cells is resistant to irradiation in vitro.
Exp Hematol.
1990;18:1002-1007[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Ploemacher RE, van der Sluijs JP, van Beurden CA, Baert MR, Chan PL.
Use of limiting-dilution type long-term marrow cultures in frequency analysis of marrow-repopulating and spleen colony-forming hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse.
Blood.
1991;78:2527-2533
27.
Crow DS, Beuer EC, Paul DL, Kobe SS, Lau AF.
Phosphorylation of connexin 43 gap junction protein in uninfected and Rous sarcoma virus-transformed mammalian fibroblasts.
Mol Cell Biol.
1990;10:1754-1763
28.
Campbell FR.
Gap junctions between cells of bone marrow: an ultrastructural study using tannic acid.
Anat Rec.
1980;196:101-107[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
29.
Yamazaki K.
Sl/Sld mice have an increased number of gap junctions in their bone marrow stromal cells.
Blood Cells.
1988;13:421-435[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Yamazaki K, Zacharov Y, Simmons PJ, Dexter TM, Allen TD.
A comparative morphometric study on the ultrastructure of adherent cells in long-term bone marrow culture from normal and congenitally anemic mice.
Blood Cells.
1989;15:343-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
White TW, Paul DL, Goodenough DA, Bruzzone R.
Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins.
Mol Biol Cell.
1995;6:459-470[Abstract].
32.
Jiang JX, Goodenough DA.
Heteromeric connexons in lens gap junction channels.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1996;93:1287-1291
33.
He DS, Jiang JX, Taffet SM, Burt JM.
Formation of heteromeric gap junction channels by connexins 40 and 43 in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:6495-6500
34.
Stauffer KA.
The gap junction proteins beta 1-connexin (connexin-32) and beta 2-connexin (connexin-26) can form heteromeric hemichannels.
J Biol Chem.
1995;270:6768-6772
35.
Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Frate H, et al.
Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells.
J Cell Biol.
1995;129:805-817
36.
Willecke K, Kirchhoff S, Plum A, Temme A, Thonnissen E, Ott T.
Biological functions of connexin genes revealed by human genetic defects, dominant negative approaches and targeted deletions in the mouse.
Novartis Found Symp.
1999;219:76-88[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
37.
Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Li E, Paul DL.
Female infertility in mice lacking connexin 37.
Nature.
1997;385:525-529[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
38.
Kirchhoff S, Nelles E, Hagendorff A, Kruger O, Traub O, Willecke K.
Reduced cardiac conduction velocity and predisposition to arrhythmias in connexin40-deficient mice.
Curr Biol.
1998;8:299-302[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
39.
Nelles E, Butzler C, Jung D, et al.
Defective propagation of signals generated by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the liver of connexin32-deficient mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1996;93:9565-9570
40.
Gabriel HD, Jung D, Butzler C, et al.
Transplacental uptake of glucose is decreased in embryonic lethal connexin26-deficient mice.
J Cell Biol.
1998;140:1453-1461
41.
Simon AM, Goodenough DA.
Diverse functions of vertebrate gap junctions.
Trends Cell Biol.
1988;8:477-483.
42.
Krenacs T, Rosendaal M.
Connexin 43 gap junctions in normal, regenerating and culture mouse bone marrow and in human leukemias.
Am J Pathol.
1998;152:993-1004[Abstract].
43.
Dahl E, Winterhager E, Reuss B, Traub O, Butterweck A, Willecke K.
Expression of the gap junction proteins connexin31 and connexin43 correlates with communication compartments in extraembryonic tissues and in the gastrulating mouse embryo, respectively.
J Cell Sci.
1996;109:191-197[Abstract].
44.
Hennemann H, Dahl E, White JB, et al.
Two gap junction genes, connexin 31.1 and 30.3, are closely linked on mouse chromosome 4 and preferentially expressed in skin.
J Biol Chem.
1992;267:17225-17233
45.
Veenstra RD.
Size and selectivity of gap junction channels formed from different connexins.
J Bioenerg Biomembr.
1996;28:327-337[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
46.
Yeager M, Gilula NB.
Membrane topology and quaternary structure of cardiac gap junction ion channels.
J Mol Biol.
1992;223:929-948[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
47.
Kwak BR, Jongsma HJ.
Selective inhibition of gap junction channel activity by synthetic peptides.
J Physiol.
1999;516:679-685
48.
Stewart WW.
Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer.
Cell.
1978;14:741-759[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
49.
Lecanda F, Towler DA, Ziambaras K, et al.
Gap junctional communication modulates gene expression in osteoblastic cells.
Mol Biol Cell.
1998;9:2249-2258
50.
Frenzel EM, Johnson RG.
Gap junction formation between cultured embryonic lens cells is inhibited by antibody to N-cadherin.
Dev Biol.
1996;179:1-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
51.
Tomasetto C, Neveu MJ, Daley J, Horan PK, Sager R.
Specificity of gap junction communication among human mammary cells and connexin transfectants in culture.
J Cell Biol.
1993;122:157-167
52.
Juneja SC, Barr KJ, Enders GC, Kidder GM.
Defects in the germ line and gonads of mice lacking connexin 43.
Biol Reprod.
1999;60:1263-1270
53.
Huang GY, Cooper ES, Waldo K, Kirby ML, Gilula NB, Lo CW.
Gap junction-mediated cell-cell communication modulates mouse neural crest migration.
J Cell Biol.
1998;143:1725-1734
54.
Gao Y, Spray DC.
Structural changes in lenses of mice lacking the gap junction protein connexin43.
Invest Ophtalmol Vis Sci.
1998;39:1198-1209
55.
Thomas SA, Schuessler RB, Berul CI, et al.
Disparate effects of deficient expression of connexin43 on atrial and ventricular conduction: evidence for chamber-specific molecular determinants of conduction.
Circulation.
1998;97:686-691
56.
Naus CC, Bechberger JF, Zhang Y, et al.
Altered gap junctional communication, intercellular signaling, and growth in cultured astrocytes deficient in connexin43.
J Neurosci Res.
1997;49:528-540[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
57.
Alves LA, de Carvalho AC, Savino W.
Gap junctions: a novel route for direct cell-cell communication in the immune system?
Immunol Today.
1998;19:269-275[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
58.
Alves LA, Coutinho-Silva R, Persechini PM, Spray DC, Savino W, Campos de Carvalho AC.
Are there functional gap junctions or junctional hemichannels in macrophages?
Blood.
1996;88:328-334
59.
Rosendaal M, Gregan A, Green CR.
Direct cell-cell communication in the blood-forming system.
Tissue Cell.
1991;23:457-470[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||