Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 September 2000, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1655-1669

REVIEW ARTICLE

Targeting the Ras signaling pathway: a rational, mechanism-based treatment for hematologic malignancies?

Christoph W. M. Reuter, Michael A. Morgan, and Lothar Bergmann

From the Department of Internal Medicine III (Hematology and Oncology), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

A series of alterations in the cellular genome affecting the expression or function of genes controlling cell growth and differentiation is considered to be the main cause of cancer. These mutational events include activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. The elucidation of human cancer at the molecular level allows the design of rational, mechanism-based therapeutic agents that antagonize the specific activity of biochemical processes that are essential to the malignant phenotype of cancer cells. Because the frequency of RAS mutations is among the highest for any gene in human cancers, development of inhibitors of the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as potential anticancer agents is a very promising pharmacologic strategy. Inhibitors of Ras signaling have been shown to revert Ras-dependent transformation and cause regression of Ras-dependent tumors in animal models. The most promising new class of these potential cancer therapeutics are the farnesyltransferase inhibitors. The development of these compounds has been driven by the observation that oncogenic Ras function is dependent upon posttranslational modification, which enables membrane binding. In contrast to many conventional chemotherapeutics, farnesyltransferase inhibitors are remarkably specific and have been demonstrated to cause no gross systemic toxicity in animals. Some orally bioavailable inhibitors are presently being evaluated in phase II clinical trials. This review presents an overview on some inhibitors of the Ras signaling pathway, including their specificity and effectiveness in vivo. Because Ras signaling plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of some hematologic malignancies, the potential therapeutic usefulness of these inhibitors is discussed. (Blood. 2000;96:1655-1669)

© 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.

    The RAS gene family
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

At the cellular surface, many different receptors are expressed that allow cellular response to extracellular signals provided by the environment. After ligand binding, receptor activation leads to a large variety of biochemical events in which small guanosine triphosphate hydrolases (GTPases; eg, Ras) are crucial. Ras proteins are prototypical G-proteins that have been shown to play a key role in signal transduction, proliferation, and malignant transformation. G-proteins are a superfamily of regulatory GTP hydrolases that cycle between 2 conformations induced by the binding of either guanosine diphosphate (GDP) or GTP1-3 (Figure 1). The Ras-like small GTPases are a superfamily of proteins that include Ras, Rap1, Rap2, R-Ras, TC21, Ral, Rheb, and M-Ras. The RAS gene family consists of 3 functional genes, H-RAS, N-RAS, and K-RAS. The RAS genes encode 21-kd proteins, which are associated with the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (H-Ras, N-Ras, and the alternatively spliced K-RasA and K-RasB). Whereas H-Ras, N-Ras, and K-RasB are ubiquitously expressed, K-RasA is induced during differentiation of pluripotent embryonal stem cells in vitro.4


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The switch function of Ras. Ras cycles between the active GTP-bound and the inactive GDP-bound state. Mitogenic signals activate guanine GEFs such as SOS and CDC25. GEFs increase the rate of dissociation of GDP and stabilize the nucleotide-free form of Ras, leading to binding of GTP to Ras proteins. Ras can also be activated by the inhibition of the GAPs.

Regulatory proteins that control the GTP/GDP cycling rate of Ras include GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which accelerate the rate of GTP hydrolysis to GDP, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs; eg, SOS and CDC25), which induce the dissociation of GDP to allow association of GTP.3 In the GTP-bound state, Ras couples the signals of activated growth factor receptors to downstream mitogenic effectors. By definition, proteins that interact with the active GTP-bound form of Ras (and thus become GTP-dependently activated) to transmit signals are called Ras effectors.5-8 Mechanisms by which GTP-Ras influences the activity of its effectors include direct activation (eg, B-Raf, PI-3 kinase), recruitment to the plasma membrane (eg, c-Raf-1), and association with substrates (eg, Ral-GDS). Other candidates for Ras effectors include protein kinases, lipid kinases, and GEFs.3,5-8


    Posttranslational modification of Ras
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

Ras proteins are produced as cytoplasmatic precursor proteins and require several posttranslational modifications to acquire full biologic activity. These modifications include prenylation, proteolysis, carboxymethylation, and palmitoylation9-13 (Figure 2).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Overview of the posttranslational modifications of Ras proteins in cells. FTase or GGTase I transfers a farnesyl (F) group or a geranylgeranyl group from FPP or GGPP to the thiol group of the cysteine residue in the CAAX motif. The C-terminal tripeptide is removed by a CAAX-specific endoprotease in the endoplasmatic reticulum. A PPMTase attaches the methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the C-terminal cysteine. Finally, a prenyl protein-specific palmitoyltransferase (PPPTase) attaches palmitoyl groups (P) to cysteines near the farnesylated C-terminus. PPMTI indicates prenyl protein-specific methyltransferase inhibitor.

Prenylation of proteins by intermediates of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway represents a newly discovered form of posttranslational modification and is catalyzed by 3 different enzymes: protein farnesyltransferase (FTase), protein geranylgeranyltransferase type I (GGTase I), and geranylgeranyltransferase type II (GGTase II).9-13 Prenylated proteins share characteristic carboxy-terminal consensus sequences and can be separated into the proteins with a CAAX (C, cysteine; A, aliphatic amino acid; X, any amino acid) motif and proteins containing a CC or CXC sequence.14-17 FTase I transfers a farnesyl group from farnesyldiphosphate (FPP), and GGTase I transfers a geranylgeranyl group from geranylgeranyldiphosphate (GGPP) to the cysteine residue of the CAAX motif.18 GGTase II transfers the geranylgeranyl groups from GGPPs to both cysteine residues of CC or CXC motifs.

Farnesylation is the first step in the posttranslational modification of Ras. This modification occurs by covalent attachment of a 15-carbon farnesyl moiety in a thioether linkage to the carboxy-terminal cysteine of proteins that contain the CAAX motif. The reaction is catalyzed by FTase, a heterodimer consisting of a 48-kd and a 45-kd subunit (alpha F/GGI and beta F). Binding sites for the substrates, FPP and the CAAX motif, are located on the alpha F- and beta F-subunits.19-21 Substrates for FTase include all known Ras proteins, nuclear lamins A and B, the gamma -subunit of the retinal trimeric G-protein transducin, rhodopsin kinase, and a peroxisomal protein termed PxF.9-13

Farnesylation of Ras proteins is followed by endoproteolytic removal of the 3 carboxy-terminal amino acids (AAX) by a cellular thiol-dependent zinc metallopeptidase.22 This endoproteolytic activity (RACE, or Ras and a-factor converting enzyme) is a composite of 2 different CAAX proteases: a zinc-dependent activity encoded by AFC1 and the type IIb signal peptidase-like RCE1 (Ras converting enzyme 1).23 The final step in the carboxy-terminal modification of proteins with a CAAX motif (eg, Ras) is the methylation of the carboxyl group of the prenylated cysteine residue by an as yet uncharacterized methyltransferase.

Some Ras proteins (H-Ras, N-Ras, Ras2) are further lipidated by palmitoylation at 1 or 2 cysteines near the farnesylated carboxy-terminus.9-13,24-27 Like farnesylation, H-Ras palmitoylation plays an important role for signaling functions in vivo.27 Microinjection experiments in Xenopus oocytes revealed that palmitoylation of H-Ras dramatically enhances its affinity for membranes as well as its ability to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and initiate meiotic maturation.11,27 Both a Ras-specific protein (palmitoyltransferase) and a palmitoyl-protein (thioesterase) have been characterized.28,29 In contrast to farnesylation and proteolysis, palmitoylation and methylation of Ras are thought to be reversible and may have a regulatory role.11,12


    The Ras-to-MAPK signal transduction pathway
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

The MAPK signaling cascades

MAPK pathways are well-conserved major signaling systems involved in the transduction of extracellular signals into cellular responses in a variety of organisms, including mammals.30-35 The core components of the MAPK signaling cascades are 3 sequential kinases, including MAP kinase (MAPK, or extracellular signal-regulated kinase, ERK), MAPK kinase (MAPKK, or MAPK/ERK kinase, MEK), and MAPKK kinase (MAPKKK, or MEK kinase, MEKK) (Figure 3). The MAPKs are activated by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine residues by upstream dual-specificity MAPKKs. MAPKKs are also phosphorylated and activated by serine- and threonine-specific MAPKKKs. At least 6 MAPK cascades have been clearly identified in mammalian cells.30-35 The best characterized MAPK signaling pathways are (1) the Ras-to-MAPK signal transduction pathway (or ERK pathway), which is responsive to signals from receptor tyrosine kinase, hematopoietic growth factor receptors, and some heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors, which promote cell proliferation or differentiation; (2) the stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) pathway, which is activated in response to stresses such as heat, high osmolarity, UV irradiation, and proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 (IL-1); and (3) the p38 pathway, which is responsive to osmotic stress, heat shock, lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha , and IL-1 (Figure 3).30-35 Scaffolding/adapter proteins such as MP-1, JSAP-1, and JIP-1 route MAPK modules in mammals by binding ERK-1 and MEK-1, JNK-3 and SEK-1 and MEKK-1, or JNK and MKK-7 and MLKs, respectively.34,35


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The best-characterized MAPK modules are the ERK pathway, the SAPK/JNK pathway, and the p38 pathway. The classical Ras-to-MAPK cascade is shown in bold. The MAPK cascades consist of a MAPKKK, a MAPKK, and a MAPK. MAPKKKs are activated through a large variety of extracellular signals such as growth factors, differentiation factors, and stress. The activated MAPKKK can phosphorylate and activate 1 or several MAPKKs, which, in turn, phosphorylate and activate a specific MAPK. Activated MAPK phosphorylates and activates various substrates in the cytoplasma and the nucleus of the cell, including transcription factors. These downstream targets control cellular responses (eg, apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation). Thick arrows connect the signaling proteins with their preferred substrates (effectors). Note the complexity and the potential for crosstalk between the pathways.

Ras-to-MAPK signaling via receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokine receptors

The Ras-to-MAPK pathway appears to be an essential shared element of mitogenic signaling. The MAPKs ERK-1 and ERK-2 are activated by various mitogens in all cells. Ras functions as a membrane-associated biologic switch that relays signals from ligand-stimulated receptors to cytoplasmatic MAPK cascades. These receptors include G-protein-coupled serpentine receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors (eg, platelet-derived growth factor receptor [PDGFR], epidermal growth factor [EGF] receptor) and cytokine receptors that cause stimulation of associated nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs; eg, Src, Lyn, Fes). Ligand binding to the extracellular domain of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) causes receptor dimerization, stimulation of protein tyrosine kinase activity, and autophosphorylation.36-40 Tyrosine autophosphorylation sites in growth factor receptors (eg, EGF receptor) function as high-affinity binding sites for SH-2 (src homology) domains of signaling molecules such as PI-3 kinase (PI-3K), phospholipase C (PLC)-gamma , p120-GAP, Shc, and SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatase.39

In contrast to receptor tyrosine kinases, cytokine receptors (such as the prototypical IL-3, IL-5, GM-CSF receptors) do not contain a kinase domain. These receptors are heterodimers of a ligand-specific alpha -subunit and a beta -subunit that is common to IL-3, IL-5, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptors.41,42 The NRTKs Lyn and Fes and the Janus kinase JAK2 are physically associated with the beta -subunit. The conserved proline-rich motifs in the alpha - and beta -subunits (eg, IL-3, IL-5, GM-CSF-R, IL-2-R, G-CSF-R, and erythropoietin-R) are critical for JAK2 binding and activation. (Figure 4). After ligand binding and receptor dimerization, the receptor-bound tyrosine kinases become activated and cause a cascade of tyrosine phosphorylations. As in the receptor tyrosine kinases, these phosphotyrosines represent docking sites for many signaling molecules, including adapter proteins (eg, PI-3K, Shc, SHP-2, Grb-2).41,42


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The classical Ras-to-MAPK cascade. (A) Signaling by cytokine receptors. The IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF receptors consist of a ligand-specific alpha -subunit and a common beta -subunit. The beta -subunit binds the NRTKs Lyn, Fes, and JAK2. After ligand binding, the alpha - and beta -subunits are thought to dimerize, thus activating the receptor-bound NRTKs and subsequently causing a cascade of tyrosine phosphorylations. The phosphotyrosine residues represent docking sites for various signaling molecules (eg, Shc, SHP-2). ERKs are activated via the classical Ras-to-MAPK pathway. In addition, the MAPKs p38 and JNK become activated. The activation pathway is not completely understood, but some lines of evidence support the involvement of Ras or HPK-1 (hematopoietic progenitor kinase, a mammalian Ste20-related protein). Activated JAK2 phosphorylates the STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) family of nuclear factors which form heterodimers and homodimers, thus causing their translocation to the nucleus and subsequent binding to gamma -activating sequences of the promoter region of various genes.41,42 (B) Signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Extracellular stimuli such as mitogens or stress result in the intracellular activation of different MAPK cascades. The ERK-1/2 pathway is activated by mitogens in all cells and is an essential part of mitogenic signaling. Translocation of a fraction of activated ERKs to the nucleus subsequently leads to activation of transcription factors such as Elk-1, CREB, SRF, and Fos.40 The Raf kinases connect upstream tyrosine kinases and Ras with downstream serine/threonine kinases. When Ras becomes GTP-loaded, Rafs bind to Ras. It is unclear if Ras-Raf binding is itself always sufficient to activate the Raf kinases, which subsequently phosphorylate and activate the downstream MEKs. GTP-Ras also binds and activates PI-3K and Ral-GEF. PI-3K produces lipid second messengers, which activate AKT (Akt kinase) and ncPKC. Ral-GEF activates Ral-GTPases by promoting the GTP-bound state of Ral. Ral-GTP binds to Ral-BP1 (a GAP for CDC42 and Rac), phospholipase D (PLD1), and Ca2+ calmodulin (CaCM). (I) Inhibitors of Ras membrane association (eg, FTI, GGTI, PPMTI, and REPI); (II) sulindac; (III) MEK inhibitors (eg, PD098059, U0126, and Ro 09-2110). The thick, black arrows show the classical Ras-to-MAPK cascade. The thick, open arrows represent the Ras-to-Ral and the Ras-to-PI-3K signaling pathways. The STAT pathway is shown on the left.

The SH3 domain of Grb-2 binds to SOS, which is a GEF for Ras and facilitates the replacement of GDP with GTP.3-8,36-40 When Ras becomes GTP-loaded, Ras effectors (such as Rafs, MEKK, PI-3K, and Ral) bind to Ras and become activated. The Raf kinases (A-Raf, B-Raf, c-Raf-1) are important Ras effectors and have been demonstrated to act as MAPKKKs/MEKKs in the Ras-to-MAPK (or ERK) pathway.36-40,43-45 Raf kinases have been shown to selectively phosphorylate and activate MAPKKs MEK-1 and MEK-2.36-40,43-45 Other MEK-1/MEK-2 activators include TPL-2, MEKK-1, and c-Mos.46-48 MEK-1 and MEK-2 are dual-specificity kinases that activate the MAPKs of the ERK subgroup (ERK-1 and ERK-2).30-35,49-52 ERK-1 and ERK-2 are proline-directed protein kinases that phosphorylate Ser/Thr-Pro motifs in the consensus sequence Pro-Xaan-Ser/Thr-Pro, where Xaa is any amino acid and n = 1 or 2. Several cytoplasmatic and nuclear substrates of the ERKs have been identified. The best-characterized ERK substrates are cytoplasmatic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), the ribosomal protein S6 kinases (RSKs), and the transcription factor Elk-1.30,32,53,54

The Ras-to-Ral and the Ras-to-PI-3K signaling pathways

Since the discovery of Raf as a direct Ras effector, numerous other putative Ras effectors have been identified.3-8 Among these, evidence to date best supports "effector" roles for the Ral-GEFs (Ral-GDS, RGL, and RGF) and the p110 subunit of PI-3K3-8,55,56 (Figure 4).

Ral-GEFs are activated via binding to GTP-Ras. Ral-GEFs in turn activate Ral-GTPases by promoting the GTP-bound state of Ral. As members of the Ras subfamily of Ras-related GTPases, Ral proteins (RalA and RalB) also cycle between the active GTP-bound states and inactive GDP-bound states. Ral-GTP binds Ral-BP1 (Ral-binding protein-1 or Rlip1 = Rip1 [Ral-interacting protein-1]), which is a GAP for CDC42 and Rac. These 2 GTPases are involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, the SAPK/JNK pathway, and the p38 pathway (Figure 3).

Ras-GTP also binds to and activates the catalytic domain of PI-3K. The lipid second-messenger molecules produced (eg, phosphatidylinositol phosphates PtdIns 3,4-P2 and PtdIns 3,4,5-P3) activate the phosphoinositide-dependent kinases PDK-1 and PDK-2, which then activate Akt kinase and nonconventional isoforms of protein kinase C (ncPKC). PI-3K has been implicated in 4 apparently distinct cellular functions, including mitogenic signaling (DNA synthesis), inhibition of apoptosis, intracellular vesicle trafficking and secretion, and regulation of actin and integrin functions. These functions are most likely mediated by distinct phosphoinositide products of PI-3K56 (Figure 4).


    Role of Ras activation in hematologic malignancies
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

The constitutive activation of Ras appears to be an important factor for the malignant growth of human cancer cells. Recently, the Ras-related proteins R-Ras, M-Ras, and TC21 have also been shown to possess transforming activities similar to those of Ras.57-59 However, their role in human malignancies is unclear. Mutations of the RAS proto-oncogenes (H-RAS, N-RAS, K-RAS) are frequent genetic aberrations found in 20% to 30% of all human tumors, although the incidences in tumor type vary greatly.60,61 The highest rate of RAS mutations was detected in adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (90%), the colon (50%), and the lung (30%). In follicular and undifferentiated carcinomas of the thyroid, the incidence of RAS mutations is also considerable (50%). The most commonly observed RAS mutations arise at sites critical for Ras regulation---namely, codons 12, 13, and 61. Each of these mutations results in the abrogation of the normal GTPase activity of Ras. While all the Ras mutants still form complexes with GAP, the GTPase reaction of Ras cannot be stimulated by GAP, thus causing an increase in the half-lives of Ras-GTP mutants.1,5 Transformation results, at least in part, from unregulated stimulation of the mitogenic signal transduction pathway.60,61

Ras activation is frequently observed in hematologic malignancies such as myeloid leukemias and multiple myelomas. In about one-third of the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemias (AML), RAS genes are mutationally activated62-73 (Table 1). N-RAS is mutated and activated in most of the cases, and the presence of the mutation is not associated with any particular FAB type, cytogenetic abnormality, or clinical feature, including prognosis.71 RAS mutations occur in about 40% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, and the frequency increases with disease progression.74 Mutations in N-RAS---especially codon 61 mutations---are more frequent than K-RAS mutations.74-78

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Activation of Ras in hematologic malignancies

In addition to activation by mutation, Ras is thought to be deregulated by constitutive activation of proto-oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.79,80 Several types of human cancers show oncogenic activation of RTKs or NRTKs. Constitutively activated versions of normal receptor tyrosine kinases contain single point mutations (eg, CSF-1 receptor, the Neu/Erb-B2 receptor, and the c-Kit receptor), duplications of juxtamembrane domain-coding sequences (eg, FLT3 receptor), or deletions of the negative regulatory regions in the ligand binding or the transmembrane domains (eg, Erb-B receptor). Point mutations of the CSF-1 receptor (c-FMS) at codons 301 and 969 were found in 10% to 20% of AML or MDS.81,82 Point mutations in the catalytic domain of the c-Kit receptor are found in some cases of myeloproliferative disorders and in 10% of the patients with mastocytosis.83-85 Furthermore, activating tandem internal duplication of the FLT3 receptor has been reported in 20% of AML.86 The members of the c-Kit/c-FMS receptor kinase family (eg, c-Kit, c-FMS, FLT3) are linked with components of the Ras-to-MAPK signaling pathway (eg, Grb-2 and Shc), suggesting that activating mutations of c-FMS and FLT3 may induce activation of Ras.87,88

In addition, translocations involving receptor tyrosine kinases produce chimeric proteins in which varying N-terminal portions of either the ligand-binding or the transmembrane domain are replaced with novel protein sequences.79,80 Several of these chimeric proteins have been found in human hematologic malignancies. The Npm-Alk fusion protein, a fusion of the N-terminal portion of Npm with the entire cytoplasmatic domain of the receptor tyrosine kinase Alk, is generated by the t(2;5) chromosomal translocation in anaplastic large cell lymphoma.89,90 Tel-PDGFRbeta is a fusion protein consisting of the transcription factor Tel (translocation, Ets, leukemia) and PDGFRbeta , a well-known receptor tyrosine kinase.91,92 It is generated by the t(5;12) translocation in a subset of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias that results in receptor dimerization and activation and thus leads to the constitutive activation of the Ras-MAPK pathway.3 Another Tel fusion protein, Tel-Abl, is generated by the t(12;9) translocation in AML.93,94 Abl is an NRTK that is also mutated and activated in chronic myelogenous leukemia.95-97 In Bcr-Abl, the product of the t(9;22) translocation, the N-terminal Bcr portion serves as an oligomerization domain. Bcr-Abl is a constitutively activated cytosolic tyrosine kinase that causes abrogation of growth factor dependence, blockade of differentiation, and direct inhibition of apoptosis. Although Ras mutations are extremely rare in chronic myelogenous leukemia, the involvement of Ras has been demonstrated in Bcr-Abl+ cells by the presence of increased levels of GTP-Ras, which leads to the activation of the Raf kinases and other Ras effectors.95-97 Thus, the deregulation of Ras function appears to be a common theme in the transformation by activated receptor and NRTKs. Ras activation may cause elevated cell cycle progression and inhibition of apoptosis.71,79,80,95-97

In addition to oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes have also been found to be involved in the deregulation of Ras. Neurofibromin, the product of the NF1 gene, encodes a Ras-GAP and is mutated in the autosomal dominant type 1 neurofibromatosis.98 Interestingly, neurofibromatosis type 1 is associated with an increased tendency to develop myeloid leukemias, especially juvenile myelomonocytic myeloid leukemia (JMML).99-107 About 15% of children with JMML cases have clinical neurofibromatosis.99 Additionally, inactivating mutations of the NF1 gene have been found in 15% of JMML without clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis, suggesting the existence of NF1 mutations in approximately 30% of all JMML cases.100,102 The involvement of Ras is demonstrated by the finding that leukemic cells from children with neurofibromatosis type 1 show a moderate elevation in the percentage of GTP-Ras.103-106 Furthermore, 15% to 30% of JMML cases lacking the NF1 mutation have activating RAS mutations.107 The observation that human JMML cells exhibit hypersensitivity to GM-CSF suggests a common pathophysiologic mechanism involving downstream Ras signaling.106-108

The pathophysiologic importance of the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway is underscored by the positioning of several oncogene and tumor suppressor gene products on this pathway (Figure 4). Furthermore, it has recently been demonstrated that mutant N-RAS induces myeloproliferative disorders resembling human chronic myelogenous leukemia, AML, and apoptotic syndromes similar to human MDS in bone marrow-repopulated mice.109 These observations make Ras and the Ras-MAPK pathway an attractive target for the development of new anticancer agents.


    Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK pathway
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

Inhibitors of Ras farnesyltransferase

Elimination of Ras function by homologous gene recombination or antisense RNA has demonstrated that expression of activated Ras is necessary for maintaining the transformed phenotype of tumor cells.110-113 Inhibitors of oncogenic Ras activity may therefore prove useful as anticancer agents against Ras-induced tumors. One strategy to impede oncogenic Ras function in vivo is the inhibition of Ras posttranslational modification. It has been demonstrated that mutation of the evolutionarily conserved CAAX motif in Ras abolishes plasma membrane binding as well as transforming activity.114-121 Although Ras undergoes several steps of posttranslational modification, only farnesylation is necessary for its membrane localization and cell-transforming activity.121 Therefore, it has been proposed that the activity of oncogenic Ras could be blocked by inhibiting the FTase responsible for this modification. However, many CAAX-containing proteins need additional palmitoylation for stable membrane association.

FTase has become a very attractive target for the development of anticancer agents because control of Ras farnesylation can control the function of oncogenic Ras.114-121 Numerous inhibitors of Ras FTase have been synthesized or identified. These Ras FTase inhibitors can be grouped into 3 classes: (1) FPP analogues such as (alpha -hydroxyfarnesyl) phosphonic acid, beta -ketophosphonic and beta -hydroxyphosphonic acid derivatives, and J-104871122-124 (Figure 5A); (2) CAAX peptide analogues such as BZA-5B, BZA-2B,125-127 L-731,734, L-731,735, L-739,749,128-132 L-739,787,133 L-739,750, L-744,832,129,134-137 B581,138 Cys-4-ABA-Met and Cys-AMBA-Met,139 FTI-276, FTI-277,140-143 B956, and its methyl ester B1096144 (Figure 5B); in addition, nonpeptidic, tricyclic FTase inhibitors have been developed such as SCH44342, SCH54429, SCH59228, and SCH66336145-149 (Figure 6); and (3) bisubstrate inhibitors such as phosphonic acid analogues, the phosphinate inhibitors BMS-185878 and BMS-186511, the phosphonate inhibitor BMS-184467, phosphinyl acid-based derivatives, and the hydroxamine acid analogues150-152 (Figure 5C).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Structures of FPP-, CAAX-based, and bisubstrate inhibitors of FTase. (A) Chemical structures of FPP and FPP-based inhibitors of FTase and PPMTase. FPP is composed of a hydrophobic farnesyl group and a highly charged pyrophosphate moiety. The basic structural element in the FTase inhibitors is a farnesyl group, a pyrophosphate isostere, and a linker. (B) CAAX-based FTase inhibitors. Structural comparison between CAAX-based FTase inhibitors of the pseudopeptide class and the CAAX tetrapeptides CIFM and CVFM. The potent, nonsubstrate FTase inhibitors CIFM and CVFM were identified by systematic amino acid replacements within the CAAX sequence. In FTI-276 and FTI-277, the AA residues of the CAAX motif have been replaced by a hydrophobic linker. (C) In bisubstrate FTase inhibitors, the farnesyl group of FPP and the tripeptide group of the CAAX motif are connected via a linker.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Nonpeptidic, tricyclic FTase inhibitors. FTase inhibitor SCH44342 had no in vivo efficacy. Further substitutions led to SCH66336, a highly potent FTase inhibitor, which was found to have therapeutically useful serum levels and half-lives when given orally to rodents and primates. SCH66336 is being tested in human clinical phase II trials.

In addition to chemically synthesized compounds, several natural products have been identified as FTase inhibitors. These include limonene,153 manumycin (UCF1-C) and its related compounds UCF1-A and UCF1-B,154-156 chaetomellic acid A and B, zaragozic acids, pepticinnamins, gliotoxin,115 barceloneic acid A,157 RPR113228,158 actinoplanic acids A and B,159 oreganic acid,160 lupane derivatives,161 saquayamycins,162 valinoctin A and its analogues,163 and ganoderic acid A and C.164

Effects of FTase inhibitors in intact tumor cells. Several FTase inhibitors were demonstrated to be active in intact cells (Table 2). These compounds have been shown to modulate several critical aspects of Ras transformation in whole cells, including selective inhibition of anchorage-independent growth of Ras-transformed fibroblasts in soft agar, morphologic reversion of the Ras-induced phenotype, and inhibition of oocyte maturation induced by oncogenic Ras without gross cytotoxic effects on normal cells. One of the first FTase inhibitors found to be active in intact tumor cells, the FPP analogue (alpha -hydroxyfarnesyl) phosphonic acid, only partially inhibited the farnesylation of Ras in H-Ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts.165 Subsequently, more potent FTase inhibitors have been developed. L-739,749 inhibited growth of Ras-transformed rat fibroblasts and caused rapid morphologic reversion of the transformed phenotype.130 The compound B581 inhibited colony formation of Ras-transformed cells in soft agar.138 BZA-5B and BZA-2B, both benzodiazepine peptidomimetic FTase inhibitors, have been shown to slow the growth of H-Ras-transformed cells at concentrations that do not affect the growth of nontransformed cells.125-127,166,167 The peptidomimetic FTase inhibitor B956 and its methyl ester B1086 inhibited the formation of soft agar colonies of 14 human tumor cell lines expressing oncogenic forms of H-Ras, N-Ras, and K-Ras.144 Five human tumor cell lines expressing wild-type Ras required higher concentrations of the drug to inhibit colony formation. About 50% of K-Ras-transformed cell lines were observed to be as resistant as non-Ras-transformed cell lines. It has been suggested that nontransformed cells may produce a form of Ras that is isoprenylated even in the presence of FTase inhibitors.144 Additionally, this phenomenon may be due to functional redundancy within the RAS family. The tricyclic inhibitor SCH44342 specifically blocks morphologic transformation induced by Val12-Ha-Ras-CVLS but not Val12-Ha-Ras-CVLL, a form of Ras engineered to bind to GGTase I, indicating that the compound is a specific inhibitor of H-Ras modification by FTase rather than K-Ras modification by GGTase.145

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of FTase inhibitors on intact cells

Similarly, several bisubstrate inhibitors of FTase were shown to inhibit oncogenic Ras-induced growth in vivo. The phosphinyl acid-based bisubstrate analogue FTase inhibitors Nos. 17 to 19 were found to inhibit the anchorage-independent colony growth of Ha-RAS-transformed NIH3T3 cells.150-152 The bisubstrate FTase inhibitor BMS-186511 inhibited FTase activity in whole cells and produced strong inhibition of Ras-transformed growth. Although both H-Ras- and K-Ras-transformed cells were affected by BMS-186511, K-Ras cells appeared to be less sensitive.151 BMS-186511 did not produce any signs of gross, unspecific cytotoxicity in untransformed normal cells.

The FTase inhibitor L-744,832 blocked the anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of 31 of 42 human tumor cell lines.136 The origin of the tumor cell and the presence or absence of mutationally activated Ras did not correlate with the response to the FTase inhibitor. Interestingly, cell lines with wild-type Ras and activated receptor tyrosine kinases were also sensitive to L-744,832. In contrast, nontransformed epithelial cell lines were far less sensitive. Recently, L-739,749 and L-744,832 have also been reported to inhibit the colony growth of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia cells, which are known to exhibit deregulated cytokine signal transduction involving the Ras pathway.132

Biologic mechanisms of FTase inhibitors in intact cells. Recent investigations into the biologic mechanism of the growth inhibition of Ras-transformed cells have shown that farnesylation of K-Ras and N-Ras is more resistant to FTase inhibitors than farnesylation of H-Ras.126,144,167,168 In part, this phenomenon is a result of a 10- to 50-fold higher affinity of FTase for K-Ras4B than for other Ras isoforms.126,170 In the absence of FTase inhibitors, all Ras proteins are present only in the farnesylated form. However, K-Ras and N-Ras (but not H-Ras) become geranylgeranylated by GGTase I in vivo in a dose-dependent manner when intracellular farnesylation is inhibited by an FTase inhibitor.126,169-171 Subsequently, both FTase and GGTase I inhibitors are required for inhibition of K-Ras processing.168,172 The lack of growth inhibition and gross cytotoxic effects of FTase inhibitors on normal cells is thought to be a result of the resistance of K-Ras processing to FTase inhibitors.167

Treatment of Ras-transformed cells with FTase inhibitors results in selective suppression of Ras-dependent oncogenic signaling. This includes the inhibition of Ras processing, which results in a decrease in the relative amount of fully processed Ras; the progressive, dose-dependent cytoplasmatic accumulation of unprocessed Ras and inactive Ras-Raf complexes; inhibition of the Ras-induced constitutive activation of MAPK138,140,141,146,173; and decreased transcriptional activity of both c-Jun and Elk-1.138 Transformation by mutationally activated Raf, MEK, Mos, or Fos (all of which are downstream effectors of Ras) is not blocked by FTase inhibitors.129,136

Although FTase inhibitors block Ras farnesylation and the Ras-induced transformed phenotype, proteins other than Ras may be targets of these compounds.174,175 FTase inhibitors block anchorage-independent growth of many human tumor cell lines in soft agar culture, but there is no correlation between biologic susceptibility and the presence of Ras mutations.136,144 In addition, anchorage-independent growth of K-Ras-transformed cells is abrogated by FTase inhibitors even though K-Ras processing is not affected.172 Although it is unclear whether soluble species of oncogenic Ras exert any biologically significant effect in drug-treated cells, it has recently been shown that nonfarnesylated H-Ras proteins can be palmitoylated and thus are biologically active. These proteins bound modestly to the plasma membranes (40%) but were still able to trigger exaggerated differentiation of PC12 cells and potent transformation of NIH3T3 fibroblasts.176

Recently, it has been suggested that the antitransforming effects of FTase inhibitors are mediated at least in part by alteration of farnesylated Rho proteins, including RhoB.174,175,177,178 In contrast to Ras proteins, RhoB exists normally in vivo in a farnesylated (RhoB-FF) and a geranylgeranylated version (RhoB-GG).179 RhoB-GG is essential for the degradation of p27KIP1 and facilitates the progression of cells from G1 to S phase. Treatment with FTase inhibitors results in a loss of RhoB-FF and a gain of RhoB-GG.178 Expression of a mutant RhoB-GG protein induces phenotypic reversion, cell growth inhibition, and activation of the cell cycle kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 in cells sensitive to FTase inhibitors, including Ras-transformed cells.178,180 P21WAF1 mediates the inhibition of cyclinE-associated protein kinase activity, pRB hypophosphorylation, and inhibition of DNA replication, which results in G1 arrest.180 In addition to the induction of the G1 block, treatment of tumor cells with FTase inhibitors induces apoptosis by upregulating Bax and Bcl-xs expression and by activating caspases.131,181-183

Synergy of FTase inhibitors with established anticancer treatments such as radiation and chemotherapeutic treatment was recently reported. Agents that prevent microtubule depolymerization, such as taxol and epothilones, act synergistically with FTase inhibitors to block cell growth. FTase inhibitors cause increased sensitivity to induction of the metaphase block by taxol and epothilones.184 In addition, FTase inhibitors have been shown to increase the radiosensitivity of human tumor cells with activating mutations of RAS oncogenes.143

Effects of FTase inhibitors in animal models. FTase inhibitors have also been shown to inhibit the growth of Ras-induced tumors in mouse xenograft models and, more dramatically, in transgenic mouse models (Table 3). Manumycin was reported to inhibit the growth of K-Ras-transformed fibrosarcoma transplanted into nude mice by approximately 70% compared with untreated controls.154 The CAAX peptide analogue L-739,749 specifically suppressed the tumor growth of H-Ras-, N-Ras-, and K-Ras-induced Rat-1 cell tumors in nude mice by 51% to 66%.129 Interestingly, L-739749 exhibited no evidence of systemic toxicity. The peptidomimetic FTase inhibitors B956 and B1086 were shown to inhibit tumor growth of EJ-1 human bladder carcinoma, HT 1080 human fibrosarcoma and, to a lesser extent, HCT116 human colon carcinoma xenografts in nude mice. Inhibition of Ras processing correlated with the inhibition of the tumor growth by B956.144 Analogues of the tetrapeptide CVFM,189 the compound Nos. 46 and 51, showed inhibition of anchorage-independent growth of stably H-Ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts as well as antitumor activity in an athymic mouse model implanted with H-Ras-transformed Rat-1 cells.187 J-104871, an FPP-competitive FTase inhibitor, suppressed tumor growth in nude mice transplanted with activated H-RAS-transformed NIH3T3 cells.124 In contrast to these results, however, treatment of irradiated mice engrafted with NF-1 deficient hematopoietic cells (-/-) with the FTase inhibitor (FTI) L-744,832 failed to revert a myeloproliferative disorder similar to JMML.190 Although L-744,832 abrogated the GM-CSF-induced growth, H-Ras processing and MAPK activation of NF-1 (-/-) hematopoietic cells, this FTI did not reduce the constitutively elevated MAPK activity levels in these cells. This may be due to the resistance of N-Ras and K-Ras processing to inhibition by the FTI.190

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of FTase inhibitors in animal models

In addition to the mouse xenograft models, FTase inhibitors have been tested in transgenic mouse models. The CAAX-based FTase inhibitor L-744,832 induced regression of mammary and salivary carcinomas in MMTV-v-Ha-RAS mice. These mice harbor the viral Ha-RAS oncogene under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat and develop spontaneous mammary and salivary carcinomas.135 In agreement with earlier observations, no systemic toxicity was observed in these mice. Furthermore, L-744,832 was also effective in mammary and lymphoid tumors overexpressing N-RAS in MMTV transgenic mice.137 In contrast to H-Ras, N-Ras remained mostly processed. Consistent with these findings, the antineoplastic effect was less intense in the N-RAS model than the H-RAS model.135,137 This observation suggests that proteins in addition to Ras may be targets of the compound. More recently, L-744,832 was shown to induce regression of mammary tumors in MMTV-TGF-alpha and MMTV-TGF-alpha /neu transgenic mice.183 Because the mammary tumor cells harbor an activated receptor tyrosine kinase but wild-type Ras, a feature common in breast cancer, these mice provide a useful model system for breast cancer research. Tumor regression by L-744,832 was demonstrated biochemically by inhibition of MAPK activity and biologically by an increase in G1-phase, a decrease in S-phase fractions, and induction of apoptosis.183

In both cell culture and mouse models, there is essentially no cytotoxicity or apparent systemic toxicity at doses capable of reverting Ras-induced transformation or of causing tumor regression. FTase inhibitors seem to selectively target a unique aspect of the transformed cell physiology.

Mechanisms of resistance to FTase inhibitors. As with any drug, the development of tumor resistance to FTase inhibitors is an important issue. To date, the relative frequency, the mechanisms, and the development of tumor resistance to FTI are unclear. K-RAS-transformed cell lines have been shown to be more resistant to FTase inhibitors than H-RAS- or N-RAS-transformed cells.126,144,167 This phenomenon is thought to be a result of a higher affinity of FTase for K-Ras than for other Ras isoforms.126,167 In addition, K-Ras and N-Ras become geranylgeranylated in the presence of FTI.169,171 Subsequently, both FTI and geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor (GGTI) are required for inhibition of K-Ras processing.168,172 Recently, a variant RAS-transformed cell line was identified that was resistant to phenotypic reversion by FTI.193 This phenomenon was not due to mutation of the FTase subunits, changes in intracellular drug accumulation, or amplification of the multiple-drug resistance gene. The precise mechanism of resistance in these cells remained unclear. However, mutational alteration of FTase might also lead to resistance toward FTI. The Y361L mutant of FTase has been shown to exhibit increased resistance to FTI while maintaining FTase activity toward substrates possessing CIIS carboxy-termini.194 Withdrawal of FTI from successfully treated tumor-bearing mice led to subsequent tumor growth in the absence of the drug. A second FTI treatment resulted in a second response in some mice, but some tumors were found to become resistant to FTI.135 Therefore, chronic, uninterrupted treatment with FTI might be required.

Inhibitors of geranylgeranyl transferase I

Until recently, the emphasis has been on designing specific FTase inhibitors to block Ras processing. This strategy was employed to avoid possible toxic effects originating from inhibition of GGTase I. Because K-RAS mutations are most common in human cancers,60,61 a critical goal is the development of inhibitors that block the growth of human tumors that harbor K-Ras. The resistance of K-Ras to FTase inhibitors,167 the lack of potency of FTase inhibitors against K-Ras-transformed cells,144 and the observation that K-Ras becomes geranylgeranylated in the presence of FTase inhibitors126,169-172 led to the development of GGTase I inhibitors (Figure 7). GGTI-279, GGTI-287, GGTI-297, and GGTI-298 are CAAL-based peptidomimetics that are selective for GGTase I over FTase.173,195-199 In contrast, FTI-276 and FTI-277 are CAAM-based peptidomimetics that are potent and selective inhibitors of FTase over GGTase I.173 H-Ras processing in human tumor cell lines was highly sensitive to FTI-277 and resistant to GGTI-286, whereas K-Ras4B processing was more sensitive to GGTI-286 than FTI-277.173 Processing of H-Ras and N-Ras was inhibited by FTI-277, but inhibition of K-Ras processing required both FTase and GGTase I inhibitors. Whereas FTI-277 preferentially blocks activation of MAPK by oncogenic H-Ras, GGTase inhibitors selectively inhibit the activation of MAPK by oncogenic K-Ras4B.173 Although GGTI-298 had very little effect on soft agar growth of several human tumor cell lines harboring H-RAS, N-RAS, or K-RAS mutations, the combination of FTI-277 and GGTI-298 resulted in significant soft agar growth inhibition.172 Both FTase inhibitors and GGTase inhibitors have been reported to arrest Ras-transformed cells in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and to induce apoptosis.142,180,196,198,199 In nude mouse xenografts, the GGTase inhibitor GGTI-297 suppressed human lung A-549 and Calu-1 carcinoma tumor growth by 60%. However, both FTase and GGTase inhibitors were required to inhibit K-Ras processing.168 Treatment of cells with GGTI-298 blocks PDGF- and EGF-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of their respective receptors and induces G0/G1-phase arrest and apoptosis.196-198 GGTI-298 has also been shown to induce the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF but not p27KIP.199


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. CAAL-based inhibitors of GGTase I.  GGTase I catalyzes the geranylgeranylation of proteins terminating with CAAX sequences where X is restricted to leucine, isoleucine or, to a lesser extent, phenylalanine. In cells, geranylgeranylation of proteins is far more common than farnesylation. Proteins modified by GGTase I include Rap1A, Rap1B, Rac1, Rac2, G25K, and RhoA.

Inhibitors of the prenylated protein methyltransferase

The C-terminal prenylated protein methyltransferase (PPMTase) is another potential therapeutically relevant target in the development of inhibitors against the posttranslational processing of Ras. N-acetyl-trans, trans-farnesyl-L-cysteine (AFC) is a substrate for PPMTase and acts as a competitive inhibitor.201 Although AFC has been shown to inhibit Ras methylation in Ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts, it does not inhibit the growth of these cells.201 New farnesyl derivatives of rigid carboxylic acid, eg, S-trans, trans-farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS), were found to inhibit the growth of H-Ras-transformed cells and to reverse their transformed morphology by a mechanism unrelated to the inhibition of Ras methylation by PPMTase202,203 (Figure 5). It is thought that FTS specifically interacts with Ras farnesylcysteine binding domains and affects membrane anchorage of Ras.202,203 In addition, it has been reported that FTS dislodges Ras from H-Ras-transformed cell membranes and renders the Ras protein susceptible to proteolytic degradation.188 At the same concentration, growth and morphology of non-Ras-transformed or nontransformed cells were not affected by FTS.203 Despite the lack of FTS-induced cytotoxicity in nontransformed cells, FTS reduced Ras levels in cell membranes and inhibited Ras-dependent cell growth.203 In contrast to FTase inhibitors (eg, BZA-5B), FTS also inhibited the growth signaling of receptor tyrosine kinases.203 FTS was shown to decrease total cellular Ras levels, MAPK activity, Raf-1 activity, and DNA synthesis in Ras-transformed EJ-1 cells. This inhibition was also demonstrated in serum-, EGF-, and thrombin-stimulated, untransformed Rat-1 cells.204,205 S-farnesyl-thioacetic acid (FTA), another competitive inhibitor of PPMTase, has been shown to suppress growth and induce apoptosis in HL-60 cells.206 Five-chloro- and 4- or 5-fluoro-derivatives of FTS and a C20 S-geranylgeranyl derivative of thiosalicyclic acid also cause inhibition of Ras-dependent MAPK activity, DNA synthesis, and EJ-1 cell growth. However, several other derivatives were inactive, suggesting stringent structural requirements for the anti-Ras activity of S-prenyl analogues.207 Recently, FTS was shown (1) to reduce the amount of activated N-Ras and wild-type Ras isoforms in human melanoma cells and Rat-1 fibroblasts, (2) to disrupt ERK signaling, (3) to revert their transformed phenotype, and (4) to cause a significant reduction in the growth of human melanoma in SCID mice.188,205

The dorrigocins are novel antifungal antibiotics that were found to reverse the morphology of Ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Dorrigocin A did not inhibit protein prenylation or protein synthesis but was instead found to inhibit the C-terminal methylation in K-Ras-transformed cells.208

Selective inhibitors of Ras C-terminal sequence-specific endoprotease

UM96001, TPCK, and BFCCMK are Ras C-terminal sequence-specific endoprotease inhibitors (REPI) and potently inhibit ras-transformed rat kidney cell growth as well as growth of human cancer cells.209 These compounds have been reported to almost completely block the anchorage-independent clonogenic growth of these cancer cells. REPIs may selectively induce apoptosis in these cells.209

Selective inhibitors of MAPKKs, or MEK

PD098059 is a synthetic inhibitor of the Ras-MAPK pathway that selectively blocks the activation of MEK-1 and, to a lesser extent, the activation of MEK-2.210,211 The inhibition of MEK-1 activation was demonstrated to prevent activation of MAPKs ERK-1/2 and subsequent phosphorylation of MAPK substrates both in vitro and in intact cells. In contrast to FTase inhibitors, PD098059 inhibited stimulation of cell growth by several growth factors.210,211 Furthermore, PD098059 reversed the transformed phenotype of Ras-transformed BALB3T3 mouse fibroblasts and rat kidney cells.211 PD098059 failed to inhibit the stress, and IL-1 stimulated JNK/SAPK and the p38 pathways,210 demonstrating its specificity for the ERK pathway. PD098059 has subsequently been used as a tool to study MAPK signaling in various cell types and in carcinogenesis.

Recently, 2 novel inhibitors of MEK-1 and MEK-2 have been identified: U0126212,213 and Ro 09-2210.214 Ro 09-2210, which was identified by screening microbial broths, exhibits potent antiproliferative effects on activated T cells.214 Similarly, U0126 was found to inhibit T-cell proliferation in response to both antigenic stimulation and cross-linked anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 antibodies.212 U0126 and PD098059 are noncompetitive inhibitors with respect to both MEK substrates (ATP and ERK) and bind to free MEK as well as MEK*ERK and MEK*ATP complexes. U0126 displays significantly higher affinity for all forms of MEK (44- to 357-fold) than does PD098059. U0126 and Ro 09-2210 have an inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) of 50 to 70 nmol/L, whereas PD098059 has an IC50 of 5 µmol/L.212-214 PD098059 and U0126 impede the growth of Ras-transformed cells in soft agar but show minimal effects on cell growth under normal culture conditions.210,213 In contrast to U0126 and PD098059, Ro 09-2210 is also able to inhibit other dual-specificity kinases such as MKK-4, MKK-6, and MKK-7, albeit at 4- to 10-fold higher IC50 concentrations compared with its effect on MEK-1.214

Inhibitors of Ras transformation with unknown mechanisms of action

Screening tests for drugs that revert RAS-transformed cells to a normal phenotype led to the identification of a number of compounds, such as azatyrosine, oxanosine, and antipain.215-217 The mechanism by which these compounds revert the RAS-induced phenotype is not understood. The pyrazolo-quinoline compound SCH51344 was identified based on its ability to depress human smooth muscle alpha -actin promoter activity in RAS-transformed cells. Treatment of v-abl-, v-mos-, v-raf-, RAS-, and mutant active MEK-transformed NIH3T3 cells resulted in growth inhibition of these cells in soft agar.218 SCH51344 had very little effect on the activities of proteins in the ERK pathway. The ability of SCH51344 to inhibit the anchorage-independent growth of RAC-V12-transformed Rat-1 cells suggests that the point of inhibition is downstream from RAC.219

The nonsteriodal, anti-inflammatory drug sulindac has been demonstrated to attenuate the growth and progression of colonic neoplasms in animal models and in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.220,221 Recently, it has been shown that sulindac sulfide (the active metabolite of sulindac) inhibits Ras signaling and transformation by noncovalent binding to the Ras protein. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that sulindac sulfide impairs Ras-Raf binding, Raf activation, and nucleotide exchange on Ras and that it accelerates the Ras-GTPase reaction.222 Sulindac is being investigated in a randomized study for the prevention of colon cancer (protocol RUH-SSH-190-0698, NCI-V98-1425).

Disruption of the Ras-to-MAPK signaling pathway has also been shown for the benzoquinone ansamycin geldanamycin. Geldanamycin binds to HSP90 and disrupts the HSP90-Raf-1 multimolecular complex, which causes destabilization of Raf-1 through enhanced degradation of Raf-1.223 However, the geldanamycin-HSP90 complex also causes depletion of other HSP90 substrates such as protein kinases and nuclear hormone receptors (including mutant p53 and ErbB2).224 Several National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical phase I trials are currently studying the effects of geldanamycin analogues in patients with advanced malignancies.


    Conclusions and future directions
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

FTase and GGTase inhibitors have strong growth inhibitory and antitumor activity in cell culture and animal tumor models without showing nonspecific gross toxicity in animals. The specificity and the lack of nonspecific toxicity contrasts dramatically with the nonspecificity and high toxicity of currently available chemotherapeutic drugs. The recent development of orally bioavailable FTase inhibitors with potent and selective in vivo antitumor activity underscores their potential usefulness in the future treatment of human malignancies. The observation that FTase and GGTase inhibitors induce apoptosis in treated tumor cells as well as a G0-G1 arrest suggests that they are not merely cytostatic but cytotoxic for tumor cells. However, the absence of toxicity due to FTase inhibitors in normal cells and tissues in mice at doses that inhibit tumor growth is poorly understood. Ras knockout experiments have demonstrated that H-RAS- and N-RAS-deficient mice are born and grow normally, whereas K-RAS-deficient embryos die between embryonic day 12.5 and term. This finding suggests a partial functional overlap within the RAS gene family.225-228 However, H-RAS and N-RAS cannot compensate for the loss of K-RAS function in K-RAS-deficient mice. Functionally redundant pathways might allow normal cells to tolerate treatment with FTase inhibitors.

Because mutated RAS genes have a high prevalence in human cancers (eg, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancers), inhibitors specific for FTase, GGTase, and MEK were initially designed to block the Ras-to-MAPK signaling in solid tumor cells. More than 90% of RAS mutations found in human tumors occur in N-RAS or K-RAS. Whereas the reversion of the H-RAS-induced transformation by FTase inhibitors correlates well with the intracellular inhibition of H-Ras processing, N-Ras and K-Ras are cross-prenylated by GGTase I in cells treated with FTase inhibitors. However, many of these N-RAS- or K-RAS-transformed cell lines (and even tumor cell lines that do not harbor RAS mutations) are sensitive to FTase inhibitors. Cell biology studies suggest that FTase and GGTase inhibitors may act at additional levels beyond the inhibition of Ras processing. The exact mechanism of action has emerged as a question of major interest, especially because transformed tumor cells respond to treatment with these inhibitors while normal cells remain largely unaffected. Non-Ras targets of FTase and GGTase inhibitors may include other cellular proteins (eg, Rho) that are farnesylated or geranylgeranylated.174,175,178,229-231

FTase inhibitors (eg, R115777, L-778,123, and SCH66336) have entered several phase I/II clinical trials (Table 4). These trials are still ongoing, and preliminary results have not been published. Because favorable synergistic effects have been described for combinations of FTase inhibitors with traditional anticancer treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy,143,184 it will be interesting to see if these results translate into improved patient outcome in clinical trials. The high prevalence of mutationally activated Ras in solid tumors has been the driving force of Ras inhibitor research. However, recent studies in cell culture and animal models suggest that transformed cells with an activated Ras pathway (eg, via mutations upstream of Ras) are also highly sensitive for FTase inhibitors. The involvement of N-RAS in the molecular pathophysiology of myeloid leukemias and multiple myeloma suggests that these malignancies may also represent promising targets for inhibitors of Ras signaling. While it is impossible to predict the outcome of the clinical trials, the biologic properties of these inhibitors are potentially informative because transformation-specific mechanisms are targeted.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. FTase inhibitors in clinical trials


    Acknowledgment

We thank Dr Kristine A. Henningfeld for help with the figures and for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes

Submitted August 24, 1999; accepted March 30, 2000.

Supported by a grant to C.W.M.R. from the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Re 864/4-1) and a grant from the University of Ulm (P.541).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: C. Reuter, Dept of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Robert-Koch-Str 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany; e-mail: christoph.reuter{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de.


    References
Top
Abstract
The RAS gene family
Posttranslational modification...
The Ras-to-MAPK signal...
Role of Ras activation...
Inhibitors of the Ras-MAPK...
Conclusions and future...
References

1. Sprang SR. G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:639-678[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

2. Bos JL. All in the family? New insights and questions regarding interconnectivity of Ras, Rap1 and Ral. EMBO J. 1998;17:6776-6782[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

3. Rebollo A, Martinez CA. Ras proteins: recent advances and new functions. Blood. 1999;94:2971-2980[Free Full Text].

4. Pells S, Divjak M, Romanowski P, et al. Developmentally-regulated expression of murine K-ras isoforms. Oncogene. 1997;15:1781-1786[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

5. Wittinghofer A. Signal transduction via Ras. Biol Chem. 1998;379:933-937.

6. Van Aelst L, White M, Wigler MH. Ras partners. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol. 1994;59:181-186[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7. Marshall CJ. Ras effectors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:197-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

8. Katz ME, McCormick F. Signal transduction from multiple Ras effectors. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997;7:75-79[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

9. Glomset JA, Farnsworth CC. Role of protein modification reactions in programming interactions between Ras-related GTPases and cell membranes. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:181-205.

10. Zhang FL, Casey PJ. Protein prenylation: molecular mechanisms and functional consequences. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:241-269[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

11. Gelb MH. Protein prenylation, et cetera: signal transduction in two dimensions. Science. 1997;275:1750-1751[Free Full Text].

12. Mumby SM. Reversible palmitoylation of signaling proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:148-154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

13. Casey PJ, Seabra MC. Protein prenyltransferases. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5289-5292[Free Full Text].

14. Reiss Y, Goldstein JL, Seabra MC, Casey PJ, Brown MS. Inhibition of purified p21ras farnesyl protein transferase by cys-AAX tetrapeptides. Cell. 1990;62:81-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

15. Reiss Y, Stradley SJ, Gierasch LM, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Sequence requirement for peptide recognition by rat brain p21ras protein farnesyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:732-736[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Yokoyama K, Goodwin GW, Ghomashchi F, Glomaset JA, Gelb MH. A protein geranylgeranyltransferase from bovine brain: implications for protein prenylation specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:5302-5306[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17. Moores SL, Schaber MD, Mosser SD, et al. Sequence dependence of protein isoprenylation. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:14603-14610[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18. Trueblood CE, Ohya Y, Rine J. Genetic evidence for in vivo cross-specificity of the CAAX-box protein prenyltransferases farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:4260-4275[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19. Pellicena P, Scholten JD, Zimmerman K, Creswell M, Huang CC, Miller WT. Involvement of the alpha subunit of farnesyl-protein transferase in substrate recognition. Biochemistry. 1996;35:13494-13500[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

20. Trueblood CE, Boyartchuk VL, Rine J. Substrate specificity determinants in the farnesyltransferase beta -subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:10774-10779[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21. Park H-W, Boduluri SR, Moomaw JF, Casey PJ, Beese LS. Crystal structure of protein farnesyltransferase at 2.25 Angstrom resolution. Science. 1997;275:1800-1804[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22. Akopyan TN, Couedel Y, Orlowski M, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP. Proteolytic processing of farnesylated peptides: assay and partial purification from pig brain membranes of an endopeptidase which has the characteristics of E.C. 3.4.24.15. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;198:787-794[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

23. Boyartchuk VL, Ashby MN, Rine J. Modulation of Ras and a-factor function by carboxyl-terminal proteolysis. Science. 1997;275:1796-1800[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24. Hancock J, Magee A, Childs J, Marshall C. All ras proteins are polyisoprenylated but only some are palmitoylated. Cell. 1989;57:1167-1177[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

25. Milligan G, Parenti M, Magee AI. The dynamic role of palmitoylation in signal transduction. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:181-187[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

26. Ross EM. Palmitoylation in G-protein signaling pathways. Curr Biol. 1995;5:107-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

27. Dudler T, Gelb MH. Palmitoylation of Ha-Ras facilitates membrane binding, activation of downstream effectors and meiotic maturation in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11541-11547[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28. Liu L, Dudler T, Gelb MH. Purification of a protein palmitoyltransferase that acts on H-Ras protein and on a C-terminal N-Ras peptide. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:23269-23276[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29. Camp LA, Verkruyse LA, Afendis SJ, Slaughter CA, Hofmann SL. Molecular cloning and expressing of palmitoyl-protein thioesterase. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23212-23219[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30. Treisman R. Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:205-215[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

31. Fanger GR, Gerwins P, Widmann C, Jarpe MB, Johnson GL. MEKKs, GCKs, MLKs, PAKs, TAKs, and Tpls: upstream regulators of the c-Jun amino-terminal kinases? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997;7:67-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

32. Robinson MJ, Cobb MH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:180-186[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

33. Garrington TP, Johnson GL. Organization and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999;11:211-218[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

34. Schaeffer HJ, Weber MJ. Mitogen-activated protein kinases: specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:2435-2444[Free Full Text].

35. Elion EA. Routing MAP kinase cascades. Science. 1998;281:1625-1626[Free Full Text].

36. Schlessinger J. How receptor tyrosine kinases activate Ras. Trends Biol Sci. 1993;18:273-275.

37. Marshall CJ. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell. 1995;80:179-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

38. Marshall CJ. Raf gets it together. Nature. 1996;383:127-128[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

39. Porter AC, Vaillancourt RR. Tyrosine kinase receptor-activated signal transduction pathways which lead to oncogenesis. Oncogene. 1998;17:13434-13452.

40. Pawson T, Saxton TM. Signaling networks---do all roads lead to the same genes? Cell. 1999;97:675-678[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

41. Adachi T, Alam R. The mechanism of IL-5 signal transduction. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:C623-C633[Abstract/Free Full Text].

42. Guthridge MA, Stomski FC, Thomas D, et al. Mechanism of activation of the GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 family of receptors. Stem Cells. 1998;16:301-313[Abstract/Free Full Text].

43. Daum G, Eisenmann-Tappe I, Fries HW, Troppmair J, Rapp U. The ins and outs of Raf kinases. Trends Biol Sci. 1994;19:474-480.

44. Catling AD, Schaeffer H-J, Reuter CWM, Reddy GR, Weber MJ. A proline-rich sequence unique to MEK1 and MEK2 is required for Raf binding and regulates MEK function. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:5214-5225[Abstract].

45. Reuter CWM, Catling AD, Jelinek T, Weber MJ. Biochemical analysis of MEK activation in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:7644-7655[Abstract/Free Full Text].

46. Patriotis C, Makris A, Chernoff J, Tsichlis PN. Tpl-2 acts in concert with Ras and Raf-1 to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:9755-9759[Abstract/Free Full Text].

47. Sameron A, Ahmad TB, Carlile GW, Pappin D, Narsimhan RP, Ley SC. Activation of MEK-1 and SEK-2 by Tpl-2 proto-oncoprotein, a novel MAP kinase kinase. EMBO J. 1996;15:817-826[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

48. Posado J, Yew N, Ahn NG, Vande-Woude GF, Cooper JA. Mos stimulates MAP kinase in Xenopus oocytes and activates MAP kinase kinase in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:2546-2553[Abstract/Free Full Text].

49. Bardwell L, Thorner J. A conserved motif at the amino termini of MEKs might mediate high affinity interaction with the cognate MAPKs. Trends Biol Sci. 1996;21:373-374.

50. Crews CM, Alessandrini A, Erikson RL. The primary structure of MEK, a protein that phosphorylates the ERK gene product. Science. 1992;258:478-480[Abstract/Free Full Text].

51. Wu J, Harrison JK, Dent P, Lynch KR, Weber MJ, Sturgill TW. Identification and characterization of a new mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, MKK2. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;8:4539-4548.

52. Zheng C-F, Guan K-L. Cloning and characterization of two distinct human extracellular signal-regulated kinase activator kinases, MEK1 and MEK2. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11435-11439[Abstract/Free Full Text].

53. Xing J, Ginty DD, Greenberg ME. Coupling of the Ras-MAPK pathway to gene activation by RSK2, a growth factor-regulated CREB kinase. Science. 1996;273:959-963[Abstract].

54. Jaaro H, Rubinfeld H, Hanoch T, Seger R. Nuclear translocation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK1) in response to mitogenic stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3742-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text].

55. Feig LA, Urano T, Cantor S. Evidence for a Ras/Ral signaling cascade. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21:438-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

56. Carpenter CL, Cantley LC. Phosphoinositide kinases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:153-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

57. Graham SM, Cox AD, Drivas G, Rush MG, D'Eustachio P, Der CJ. Aberrant function of the Ras-related protein TC21/R-Ras2 triggers malignant transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4108-4115[Abstract/Free Full Text].

58. Cox AD, Brtva TR, Lowe DG, Der CJ. R-Ras induces malignant, but not morphologic, transformation of NIH3T3 cells. Oncogene. 1994;9:3281-3288[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

59. Quilliam LA, Castro AF, Rogers-Graham KS, Martin CB, Der CJ, Bi C. M-Ras/R-Ras3, a transforming ras protein regulated by SOS1, GRF1, and p120 Ras GTPase-activating protein, interacts with the putative Ras effector AF6. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23850-23857[Abstract/Free Full Text].

60. Bos JL. RAS oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4682-4689[Abstract/Free Full Text].

61. Clark GJ, Der CJ. Ras proto-oncogene activation in human malignancy. In: Garrett CT,Sell S, eds. Cellular Cancer Markers. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1995:17-52.

62. Janssen J, Steenvoorden A, Lyons J, et al. Ras gene mutations in acute and chronic myelocytic leukemias, chronic myeloproliferative disorders, and myelodysplastic syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:9228-9232[Abstract/Free Full Text].

63. Bos JL, Verlaan-de-Vries M, van-der-Eb AJ, et al. Mutations in N-Ras predominate in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1987;69:1237-1241[Abstract/Free Full Text].

64. Farr CJ, Saiki RK, Erlich HA, McCormick F, Marshall CJ. Analysis of Ras gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by polymerase chain reaction and oligonucteotide probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:1629-1633[Abstract/Free Full Text].

65. Padua RA, Carter G, Hughes D, et al. Ras mutations in myelodysplasia detected by amplification, oligonucteotide hybridization and transformation. Leukemia. 1988;2:503-510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

66. Senn HP, Tran-Thang C, Wodnar-Filipowicz A, et al. Mutational analysis of the N-RAS proto-oncogene in active and remission phase acute leukemias. Int J Cancer. 1988;41:59-64[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

67. Toksoz D, Farr CJ, Marshall CJ. Ras genes and acute myeloid leukemia. Br J Haematol. 1989;71:1-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

68. Browett PJ, Yaxley JC, Norton JD. Activation of Harvey ras oncogene by mutation at codon 12 is very rare in hematopoietic malignancies. Leukemia. 1989;3:86-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

69. Browett PJ, Norton JD. Analysis of RAS gene mutations and methylation state in human leukemias. Oncogene. 1989;4:1029-1036[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

70. Parker J, Mufti GJ. Ras and myelodysplasia: lessons from the last decade. Semin Hematol. 1996;33:206-224[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

71. Byrne JL, Marshall CJ. The molecular pathophysiology of myeloid leukaemias: Ras revisited. Br J Haematol. 1998;100:256-264[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

72. Vogelstein B, Civin CI, Preisinger AC, et al. Ras gene mutations in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1990;2:159-162[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

73. Hirsch-Ginsberg C, LeMaistre AC, Kantarjian H, et al. Ras mutations are rare events in Philadelphia chromosome-negative/bcr gene rearrangement-negative chronic myelogenous leukemia, but are prevalent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 1990;76:1214-1219[Abstract/Free Full Text].

74. Hallek M, Leif Bergsagel P, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma: increasing evidence for a multistep transformation process. Blood. 1998;91:3-21[Free Full Text].

75. Neri A, Knowes DM, Greco A, McCormick F, Dalla-Favera R. Analysis of Ras oncogene mutations in human lymphoid malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:9268-9272[Abstract/Free Full Text].

76. Neri A, Murphy JP, Cro L, et al. Ras oncogene mutation in multiple myeloma. J Exp Med. 1989;170:1715-1725[Abstract/Free Full Text].

77. Tanaka K, Takechi M, Asaoku H, Dohy H, Kamada N. A high frequency of N-Ras oncogene mutations in multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol. 1992;56:119-127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

78. Corradini P, Ladetto M, Voena C, et al. Mutational activation of N- and K-RAS oncogenes in plasma cell dyscrasias. Blood. 1993;81:2708-2713[Abstract/Free Full Text].

79. Hunter T. Oncoprotein networks. Cell. 1997;88:333-346[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

80. Sawyers CL, Denny CT. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Tel-a-kinase what Ets all about. Cell. 1994;77:171-173[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

81. Tobal K, Pagliuca A, Bhatt B, Bailey N, Layton DM, Mufti GJ. Mutation of the human FMS gene (M-CSF receptor) in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 1990;4:486-489[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

82. Padua RA, Guinn BA, Al-Sabah AI, et al. Ras, FMS and p53 mutations and poor clinical outcome in myelodysplasias: a 10-year follow-up. Leukemia. 1998;12:887-892[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

83. Nakata Y, Kimura A, Katoh O, et al. c-kit point mutation of extracellular domain in patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Br J Haematol. 1995;91:661-663[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

84. Buttner C, Henz BM, Welker P, Sepp NT, Grabbe J. Identification of activating c-kit mutations in adult-, but not in childhood-onset indolent mastocytosis: a possible explanation for divergent clinical behavior. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:1227-1231[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

85. Nagata H, Worobec AS, Oh CK, et al. Identification of a point mutation in the catalytic domain of the protooncogene c-kit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients who have mastocytosis with an associated hematologic disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:10560-10564[Abstract/Free Full Text].

86. Kiyoi H, Naoe T, Nakano Y, et al. Prognostic implication of FLT3 and N-Ras gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1999;93:3074-3080[Abstract/Free Full Text].

87. Dosil M, Wang S, Lemischka IR. Mitogenic signalling and substrate specificity of the Flk2/Flt3 receptor tyrosine kinase in fibroblasts and interleukin 3-dependent hematopoietic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:6572-6585[Abstract/Free Full Text].

88. Rohrschneider LR, Bourette RP, Lioubin MN, Algate PA, Myles GM, Carlberg K. Growth and differentiation signals regulated by the M-CSF receptor. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;46:96-103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

89. Elmberger PG, Lozano MD, Weisenburger DD, Sanger W, Chan WC. Transcripts of the npm-alk fusion gene in anaplastic large cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, and reactive lymphoid lesions. Blood. 1995;86:3517-3521[Abstract/Free Full Text].

90. Waggott W, Lo YM, Bastard C, et al. Detection of NPM-ALK DNA rearrangement in CD30 positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 1995;89:905-907[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

91. Golub T, Barker G, Lovett M, Gilliland D. Fusion of PDGF receptor beta  to a novel ets-like gene, tel, in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with t(5;12) chromosomal translocation. Cell. 1994;77:307-316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

92. Jousset C, Carron C, Boureux A, et al. A domain of TEL conserved in a subset of ETS proteins defines a specific oligomerization interface essential to the mitogenic properties of the TEL-PDGFRbeta oncoprotein. EMBO J. 1997;16:69-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

93. Papadopoulos P, Ridge SA, Boucher CA, Stocking C, Wiedemann LM. The novel activation of abl by fusion to an ets-related gene, tel. Cancer Res. 1995;55:34-38[Abstract/Free Full Text].

94. Golub TR, Goga A, Barker GF, et al. Oligomerization of the ABL tyrosine kinase by the Ets protein TEL in human leukemia. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4107-4116[Abstract].

95. Kurzrock R, Gutterman J, Talpaz M. The molecular genetics of Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:990-998[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

96. Faderl S, Talpaz M, Estrow Z, O'Brien S, Kurzrock R, Kantarjian HM. The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:164-172[Free Full Text].

97. Zou X, Calame K. Signaling pathways activated by oncogenic forms of Abl tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:18141-18144[Free Full Text].

98. Xu G, O'Connell P, Viskochil D, et al. The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP. Cell. 1990;62:599-608[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

99. Niemeyer CM, Arico M, Basso G, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases. Blood. 1997;89:3534-3543[Abstract/Free Full Text].

100. Shannon KM, O'Connell P, Martin GA, et al. Loss of the normal NF-1 allele from the bone marrow of children with type 1 neurofibromatosis and malignant myeloid disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:597-601[Abstract/Free Full Text].

101. Stiller CA, Chessells JM, Fitchett M. Neurofibromatosis and childhood leukemia/lymphoma: a population based UKCCSG study. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:969-972[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

102. Side L, Taylor B, Cayouette M, et al. Homozygous inactivation of the NF-1 gene in bone marrow cells from children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and malignant myeloid disorders. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1713-1720[Abstract/Free Full Text].

103. DeClue JE, Papageorge AG, Fletcher JA, et al. Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis. Cell. 1992;69:265-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

104. Kalra R, Paderanga DC, Olson K, Shannon KM. Genetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that NF-1 limits myeloid cell growth through p21ras. Blood. 1994;84:3435-3439[Abstract/Free Full Text].

105. Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, et al. Loss of NF-1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in hematopoietic cells. Nat Genet. 1996;12:144-148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

106. Largaespada DA, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. NF-1 deficiency causes Ras-mediated granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor hypersensitivity and chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 1996;12:137-143[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

107. Miyauchi J, Asada M, Sasaki M, Tsunematsu Y, Kojima S, Mizutani S. Mutations of N-ras gene in juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 1994;83:2248-2254[Abstract/Free Full Text].

108. Birnbaum RA, O'Marcaigh A, Wardak Z. NF1 and GM-CSF interact in myeloid leukemogenesis. Mol Cell. 2000;5:189-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

109. MacKencie KL, Dolnikov A, Millington M, Shounan Y, Symonds G. Mutant N-ras induces myeloproliferative disorders and apoptosis in bone marrow repopulated mice. Blood. 1999;93:2043-2056[Abstract/Free Full Text].

110. Saison-Behmoaras T, Tocque B, Rey I, Chassignol M, Thuong NT, Helene C. Short modified antisense oligonucleotides directed against Ha-RAS point mutation induce selective cleavage of the mRNA and inhibit T24 cells proliferation. EMBO J. 1991;10:1111-1118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

111. Mukhopadhyah T, Tainsky M, Cavender AC, Roth JA. Specific inhibition of K-ras expression and tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells by antisense RNA. Cancer Res. 1991;51:1744-1748[Abstract/Free Full Text].

112. Shirasawa S, Furuse M, Yokoyama N, Sasazuki T. Altered growth of human colon cancer cell lines disrupted at activated Ki-Ras. Science. 1993;260:85-88[Abstract/Free Full Text].

113. Kashani-Sabet M, Funato T, Florenes VA, Fodstad O, Scanlon KJ. Suppression of the neoplastic phenotype in vivo by an anti-ras ribozyme. Cancer Res. 1994;54:900-902[Abstract/Free Full Text].

114. Gibbs JB. Ras C-terminal processing enzymes: new drug targets? Cell. 1991;65:1-4[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

115. Tamanoi F. Inhibitors of Ras farnesyltransferases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993;18:349-353[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

116. Gibbs JB, Oliff A. Pharmaceutical research in molecular oncology. Cell. 1994;79:193-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

117. Gibbs JB, Oliff A, Kohl NE. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: Ras research yields a potential cancer therapeutic. Cell. 1994;77:175-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

118. Lowy DR, Willumsen BM. Rational cancer therapy. Nat Med. 1995;1:747-748[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

119. Gibbs JB, Oliff A. The potential of farnesyltransferase inhibitors as cancer chemotherapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:143-166[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

120. Omer CA, Kohl NE. CA1A2X-competitive inhibitors of farnesyltransferase as anti-cancer agents. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18:437-444[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

121. Heimbrook DC, Oliff A. Therapeutic intervention and signaling. Curr Biol. 1998;10:284-288.

122. Kato K, Cox AD, Hisaka MM, Graham SM, Buss JE, Der CJ. Isoprenoid addition to Ras protein is the critical modification for its membrane association and transforming activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:6403-6407[Abstract/Free Full Text].

123. Kang MS, Stemerick DM, Zwolshen JH, Harry BS, Sunkara PS, Harrison BL. Farnesyl-derived inhibitors of Ras farnesyl transferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;217:245-249[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

124. Yonemoto M, Satoh T, Arakawa H, et al. J-104,871, a novel farnesyltransferase inhibitor, blocks Ras farnesylation in vivo in a farnesyl pyrophosphate-competitive manner. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:1-7[Abstract/Free Full Text].

125. James GL, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, et al. Benzodiazepine peptidomimetics: potent inhibitors of Ras farnesylation in animal cells. Science. 1993;260:1937-1942[Abstract/Free Full Text].

126. James GL, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Polylysine and CVIM sequences of K-RasB dictate specificity of prenylation and confer resistance to benzodiazepine peptidomimetic in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:6221-6226[Abstract/Free Full Text].

127. Dalton MB, Fantle KS, Bechtold HA, et al. The farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor BZA-5B blocks farnesylation of nuclear lamins and p21ras but does not affect their function or localization. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3295-3304[Abstract/Free Full Text].

128. Kohl NE, Mosser SD, DeSolms SJ, et al. Selective inhibition of ras-dependent transformation by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor. Science. 1993;260:1934-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text].

129. Kohl NE, Wilson FR, Mosser SD, et al. Protein farnesyltransferase inhibitors block the growth of ras-dependent tumors in nude mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:9141-9145[Abstract/Free Full Text].

130. Prendergast GC, Davide JP, DeSolms JS, et al. Farnesyltransferase inhibition causes morphological reversion of ras-transformed cells by a complex mechanism that involves regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4193-4202[Abstract/Free Full Text].

131. Lebowitz PF, Sakamuro D, Prendergast GC. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors induce apoptosis of Ras-transformed cells denied substratum attachment. Cancer Res. 1997;57:708-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].

132. Emanuel PD, Snyder RC, Wiley T, Gopurala B, Castleberry RP. Inhibition of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia cell growth in vitro by farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Blood. 2000;95:639-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].

133. Koblan KS, Culberson JC, DeSolms SJ, et al. NMR studies of novel inhibitors bound to farnesyl-protein transferase. Protein Sci. 1995;4:681-688[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

134. Barrington RE, Subler MA, Rands E, et al. A farnesyltransferase inhibitor induces tumor regression in transgenic mice harboring multiple oncogenic mutations by mediating alterations in both cell cycle control and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:85-92[Abstract/Free Full Text].

135. Kohl NE, Omer CA, Conner MW, et al. Inhibition of farnesyltransferase induces regression of mammary and salivary carcinomas in ras transgenic mice. Nat Med. 1995;1:792-797[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

136. Sepp-Lorenzino L, Ma Z, Rands E, et al. A peptidomimetic inhibitor of farnesyl: protein transferase blocks the anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5302-5309[Abstract/Free Full Text].

137. Mangues R, Corral T, Kohl NE, et al. Antitumor effect of a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor in mammary and lymphoid tumors overexpressing N-RAS in transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1253-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text].

138. Cox AD, Garcia AM, Westwick JK, et al. The CAAX peptidomimetic compound B581 specifically blocks farnesylated, but not geranylgeranylated or myristylated, oncogenic ras signaling and transformation. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:19203-19206[Abstract/Free Full Text].

139. Qian Y, Blaskovich MA, Saleem M, et al. Design and structural requirements of potent peptidomimetic inhibitors of p21ras farnesyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12410-12413[Abstract/Free Full Text].

140. Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Ras CAAX peptidomimetic FTI-276 selectively blocks tumor growth in nude mice of a human lung carcinoma with K-Ras mutation and p53 deletion. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4243-4247[Abstract/Free Full Text].

141. Lerner EC, Qian Y, Blaskovich MA, et al. Ras CAAX peptidomimetic FTI-277 selectively blocks oncogenic ras signaling by inducing cytoplasmatic accumulation of inactive Ras-Raf complexes. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26802-26806[Abstract/Free Full Text].

142. Bredel M, Pollack IF, Freund JM, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Inhibition of Ras and related G-proteins as a therapeutic strategy for blocking malignant glioma growth. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:124-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

143. Bernhard EJ, McKenna WG, Hamilton AD, et al. Inhibiting Ras prenylation increases the radiosensitivity of human tumor cell lines with activating mutations of ras oncogenes. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1754-1761[Abstract/Free Full Text].

144. Nagasu T, Yoshimatsu K, Rowell C, Lewis MD, Garcia AM. Inhibition of human tumor xenograft growth by treatment with the farnesyl transferase inhibitor B956. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5310-5314[Abstract/Free Full Text].

145. Bishop WR, Bond R, Petrin J, et al. Novel tricyclic inhibitors of farnesyl protein transferase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:30611-30618[Abstract/Free Full Text].

146. Njoroge FG, Vibulbhan B, Pinto P, et al. Potent, selective, and orally bioavailable tricyclic pyridyl acetamide N-oxide inhibitors of farnesyl protein transferase with enhanced in vivo antitumor activity. J Med Chem. 1998;41:1561-1567[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

147. Njoroge FG, Taveras AG, Kelly J, et al. (+)-4-[2-[4-(8-Chloro-3,10-dibromo-6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cycloheptal[1,2b]-pyridin-11(R)-yl)-1-piperidinyl]-2-oxo-ethyl]-1-piperidinecarboxamide (SCH66336): a very potent farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor as a novel antitumor agent. J Med Chem. 1998;41:4890-4902[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

148. Mallams AK, Rossman RR, Doll RJ, et al. Inhibitors of farnesyl protein transferase. 4-Amido, 4-carbamoyl, and 4-carboxamido derivatives of 1-(8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]-cyclohepta[1,2b]pyridin-11-yl)piperazine and 1-(3-bromo-8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2b]pyridin-11-yl)piperazine. J Med Chem. 1998;41:877-893[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

149. Liu M, Bryant MS, Chen J, et al. Effects of SCH59228, an orally bioavailable farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, on the growth of oncogene-transformed fibroblasts and a human colon carcinoma xenograft in nude mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43:50-58[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

150. Patel DV, Gordon EM, Schmidt RJ, et al. Phosphinyl acid-based bisubstrate analog inhibitors of ras farnesyl protein transferase. J Med Chem. 1995;38:435-442[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

151. Manne V, Yan N, Carboni JM, et al. Bisubstrate inhibitors of farnesyltransferase: a novel class of specific inhibitors of ras-transformed cells. Oncogene. 1995;10:1763-1779[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

152. Patel DV, Young MG, Robinson SP, Hunihan L, Dean BJ, Gordon EM. Hydroxamic acid-based bisubstrate analog inhibitors of Ras farnesyl protein transferase. J Med Chem. 1996;39:4197-4210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

153. Gelb MH, Tamanoi F, Yokoyama K, Ghomashchi F, Esson K, Gould MN. The inhibition of protein prenyltransferases by oxygenated metabolites of limonene and perillyl alcohol. Cancer Lett. 1995;91:169-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

154. Hara M, Akasaka K, Akinaga S, et al. Identification of Ras farnesyltransferase inhibitors by microbial screening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:2281-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text].

155. Nagase T, Kawata S, Tamura S, et al. Manumycin and gliotoxin derivative KT7595 block Ras farnesylation and cell growth but do not disturb lamin farnesylation and localization in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:1001-1010[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

156. Kainuma O, Asano T, Hasegawa M, et al. Inhibition of growth and invasive activity of human pancreatic cancer cells by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, manumycin. Pancreas. 1997;15:379-383[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

157. Jayasuriya H, Bali RG, Zink DL, et al. Barcelonic acid A, a new farnesyl-protein transferase inhibitor from Phoma species. J Nat Prod. 1995;58:986-991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

158. Van der Pyl D, Cans P, Debernard JJ, et al. RPR113228, a novel farnesyl-protein transferase inhibitor produced by Chrysosporium lobatum. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1995;48:736-737[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

159. Silverman KC, Cascales C, Genilloud O, et al. Actinoplanic acids A and B as novel inhibitors of farnesyl-protein transferase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995;43:610-616[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

160. Silverman KC, Jayasuriya H, Cascales C, et al. Oreganic acid, a potent inhibitor of Ras farnesyl-protein transferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;232:478-481[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

161. Sturm S, Gil RR, Chai HB, et al. Lupane derivatives from Lophopetalum wallichi with farnesyl protein transferase inhibitory activity. J Nat Prod. 1996;59:658-663[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

162. Sekizawa R, Iinuma H, Naganawa H, et al. Isolation of novel saquayamycins as inhibitors of farnesyl-protein transferase. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1996;49:487-490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

163. Tsuda M, Muraoka Y, Takeuchi T, Sekizawa R, Umezawa K. Stereospecific synthesis of a novel farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, valinoctin and its analogues. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1996;49:1031-1035[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

164. Lee S, Park S, Oh JW, Yang C. Natural inhibitors for protein prenyltransferase. Planta Med. 1998;64:303-308[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

165. Gibbs JB, Pompliano DL, Mosser SD, et al. Selective inhibition of farnesyl-protein transferase blocks ras processing in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:7617-7620[Abstract/Free Full Text].

166. James GL, Brown MS, Cobb MH, Goldstein JL. Benzodiazepine peptidomimetic BZA-5B interrupts the MAP kinase activation pathway in H-Ras-transformed Rat-1 cells, but not in untransformed cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:27705-27714[Abstract/Free Full Text].

167. James G, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Resistance of K-RasBV12 proteins to farnesyltransferase inhibitors in Rat1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:4454-4458[Abstract/Free Full Text].

168. Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Both farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors are required for inhibition of oncogenic K-Ras prenylation but each alone is sufficient to suppress human tumor growth in nude mouse xenografts. Oncogene. 1998;16:1467-1473[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

169. Whyte DB, Kirschmeier P, Hockenberry TN, et al. K-Ras and N-Ras are geranylgeranylated in cells treated with farnesyl protein transferase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14459-14464[Abstract/Free Full Text].

170. Zhang FL, Kirschmeier P, Carr D, et al. Characterization of Ha-ras, N-ras, Ki-Ras4A, and Ki-Ras4B as in vitro substrates for farnesyl protein transferase and geranylgeranyl protein transferase type I. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:10232-10239[Abstract/Free Full Text].

171. Rowell CA, Kowalczyk JJ, Lewis MD, Garcia AM. Direct demonstration of geranylgeranylation and farnesylation of Ki-Ras in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:14093-14097[Abstract/Free Full Text].

172. Lerner EC, Zhang TT, Knowles DB, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SD. Inhibition of the prenylation of K-RAS, but not H- or N-RAS is highly resistant to CAAX peptidomimetics and requires both a farnesyltransferase and a geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor in human tumor cell lines. Oncogene. 1997;15:1283-1288[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

173. Lerner EC, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Disruption of oncogenic K-Ras4B processing and signaling by a potent geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:26770-26773[Abstract/Free Full Text].

174. Lebowitz PF, Davide JP, Prendergast GC. Evidence that farnesyltransferase inhibitors suppress Ras transformation by interfering with Rho activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:66136622.

175. Lebowitz PF, Prendergast GC. Non-Ras targets of farnesyltransferase inhibitors: focus on Rho. Oncogene. 1998;17:1439-1445[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

176. Booden MA, Baker TL, Solski PA, Der CJ, Punke SG, Buss JE. A non-farnesylated Ha-Ras protein can be palmitoylated and trigger potent differentiation and transformation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:1423-1431[Abstract/Free Full Text].

177. Cox AD, Der CJ. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors and cancer treatment: targeting simply Ras? Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1333:F51-F71[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

178. Du W, Lebowitz PF, Prendergast GC. Cell growth inhibition by farnesyltransferase inhibitors is mediated by gain of geranylgeranylated RhoB. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1831-1840[Abstract/Free Full Text].

179. Adamson P, Marshall CJ, Hall A, Tilbrook PA. Post-translational modifications of p21rho proteins. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:2003320038.

180. Sepp-Lorenzino L, Rosen N. A farnesyl-protein transferase inhibitor induces p21 expression and G1 block in p53 wild type tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:20243-20251[Abstract/Free Full Text].

181. Hung WC, Chuang LY. Involvement of caspase family proteases in FPT inhibitor II-induced apoptosis in human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 1998;12:1339-1342.

182. Hung WC, Chuang LY. The farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FPT inhibitor III upregulates Bax and Bcl-xs expression and induces apoptosis in human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1998;12:137-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

183. Norgaard P, Law B, Joseph H, et al. Treatment with farnesyl-protein transferase inhibitor induces regression of mammary tumors in transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha and TGF alpha/neu transgenic mice by inhibition of mitogenic activity and induction of apoptosis. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:35-42[Abstract/Free Full Text].

184. Moasser MM, Sepp-Lorenzino L, Kohl NE, Oliff A, Balog A, Su DS. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors cause enhanced mitotic sensitivity to taxol and epothilones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1369-1374[Abstract/Free Full Text].

185. DeSolms SJ, Giuliani EA, Graham SL, et al. N-Arylalkyl pseudopeptide inhibitors of farnesyltransferase. J Med Chem. 1998;41:2651-2656[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

186. McNamara DJ, Dobrusin E, Leonard DM, et al. C-terminal modifications of histidyl-N-benzylglycinamides to give improved inhibition of Ras farnesyltransferase, cellular activity, and anticancer activity in mice. J Med Chem. 1997;40:3319-3322[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

187. Leftheris K, Kline T, Vite GD, et al. Development of potent inhibitors of Ras farnesyltransferase possessing cellular and in vivo activity. J Med Chem. 1996;39:224-236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

188. Jansen B, Schlagbauer-Wadl H, Kahr H, et al. Novel Ras antagonist blocks human melanoma growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:14019-14024[Abstract/Free Full Text].

189. Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Paris KJ, Burnier JP, Marsters JC Jr. Tetrapeptide inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase: amino-terminal substitution in phenylalanine-containing tetrapeptides restores farnesylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:8313-8316[Abstract/Free Full Text].

190. Mahgoub N, Taylor BR, Gratiot M, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of a farnesyltransferase inhibitor on NF-1-deficient hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1999;94:2469-2476[Abstract/Free Full Text].

191. Ito T, Kawata S, Tamura S, et al. Suppression of human pancreatic cancer growth in BALB/c nude mice by manumycin, a farnesyl:protein transferase inhibitor. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1996;87:113-116[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

192. Liu M, Bryant MS, Chen J, et al. Antitumor activity of SCH66336, an orally bioavailable tricyclic inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase, in human tumor xenograft models and Wap-ras transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4947-4956[Abstract/Free Full Text].

193. Prendergast GC, Davide JP, Lebowitz PF, Wechsler-Reya R, Kohl NE. Resistance of a variant ras-transformed cell line to phenotypic reversion by farnesyl transferase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2626-2632[Abstract/Free Full Text].

194. Del Villar K, Urano J, Guo L, Tamanoi F. A mutant form of human protein farnesyltransferase exhibits increased resistance to farnesyltransferase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:27010-27017[Abstract/Free Full Text].

195. Qian Y, Vogt A, Vasudevan A, Sebti SM, Hamilton AD. Selective inhibition of type-I geranylgeranyltransferase in vitro and in whole cells by CAAL peptidomimetics. Bioorg Med Chem. 1998;6:293-299[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

196. Vogt A, Qian Y, McGuire TF, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Protein geranylgeranylation, not farnesylation, is required for the G1 to S phase transition in mouse fibroblasts. Oncogene. 1996;13:1991-1999[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

197. McGuire TF, Qian Y, Vogt A, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine phosphorylation requires protein geranylgeranylation but not farnesylation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:27402-27407[Abstract/Free Full Text].

198. Miquel K, Pradines A, Sun J, et al. GGTI-298 induces G0-G1 block and apoptosis whereas FTI-277 causes G2-M enrichment in A549 cells. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1846-1850[Abstract/Free Full Text].

199. Vogt A, Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. The geranylgeranyltransferase-I inhibitor GGTI-298 arrests human tumor cells in G0/G1 and induces p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1) in a p53-independent manner. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27224-27229[Abstract/Free Full Text].

200. Lantry LE, Zhang Z, Yao R, et al. Effect of farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-276 on established lung adenomas from A/J mice induced by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:113-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].

201. Volker C, Miller RA, McCleary WR, et al. Effects of farnesylcysteine analogs on protein carboxyl methylation and signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:21515-21522[Abstract/Free Full Text].

202. Marciano D, Ben-Baruch G, Marom M, Egozi Y, Haklai R, Kloog Y. Farnesyl derivatives of rigid carboxylic acids---inhibitors of Ras-dependent cell growth. J Med Chem. 1995;38:1267-1272[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

203. Marom M, Haklai R, Ben-Baruch G, Marciano D, Egozi Y, Kloog Y. Selective inhibition of Ras-dependent cell growth by farnesylthiosalisylic acid. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:22263-22270[Abstract/Free Full Text].

204. Gana-Weisz M, Haklai R, Marciano D, Egozi Y, Ben-Baruch G, Kloog Y. The Ras antagonist S-farnesylthiosalicylic acid induces inhibition of MAPK activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;239:900-904[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

205. Haklai R, Weisz MG, Elad G, et al. Dislodgment and accelerated degradation of Ras. Biochemistry. 1998;37:1306-1314[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

206. Perez-Sala D, Gilbert BA, Rando RR, Canada FJ. Analogs of farnesylcysteine induce apoptosis in HL-60 cells. FEBS Lett. 1998;426:319-324[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

207. Aharonson Z, Gana-Weisz M, Varsano T, Haklai R, Marciano D, Kloog Y. Stringent structural requirements for anti-Ras activity of S-prenyl analogues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1406:40-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

208. Kadam S, McAlpine JB. Dorrigocins: novel antifungal antibiotics that change the morphology of ras-transformed NIH/3T3 cells to that of normal cells. III. Biological properties and mechanism of action. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1994;47:875-880[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

209. Chen Y. Selective inhibition of ras-transformed cell growth by a novel fatty acid-based chloromethyl ketone designed to target Ras endoprotease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;886:103-108[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

210. Alessi DR, Cuenda A, Cohen P, Dudley DT, Saltiel AD. PD 098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27489-27494[Abstract/Free Full Text].

211. Dudley DT, Pang L, Decker SJ, Bridges AJ, Saltiel AR. A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7686-7689[Abstract/Free Full Text].

212. DeSilva DR, Jones EA, Favata MF, et al. Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase blocks T cell proliferation but does not induce or prevent anergy. J Immunol. 1998;160:4175-4181[Abstract/Free Full Text].

213. Favata MF, Horiuchi KJ, Manos EJ, et al. Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18623-18632[Abstract/Free Full Text].

214. Williams DH, Wilkinson SE, Purton T, Lamont A, Flotow H, Murray EJ. Ro 09-2210 exhibits potent anti-proliferative effects on activated T-cells by selectively blocking MKK activity. Biochemistry. 1998;37:9579-9585[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

215. Cox LY, Motz J, Troll W, Garte SJ. Antipain-induced suppression of oncogene expression in H-ras-transformed NIH3T3 cells. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4810-4814[Abstract/Free Full Text].

216. Itoh O, Kuroiwa S, Atsumi S, Umezawa K, Takeuchi T, Mar M. Induction by guanosine analogue oxanosine of reversion toward the normal phenotype of K-ras transformed rat kidney cells. Cancer Res. 1989;49:996-1000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

217. Shindo-Okado N, Makabe O, Nagahara H, Nishimura S. Permanent conversion of mouse and human cells transformed by activated ras or raf genes to apparently normal cells by treatment with the antibiotic azatyrosine. Mol Carcinog. 1989;2:159-167[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

218. Kumar CC, Prorock-Rogers C, Kelly J, et al. SCH51344 inhibits ras transformation by a novel mechanism. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5106-5117[Abstract/Free Full Text].

219. Walsh AB, Dhanasekaran M, Bar-Sagi D, Kumar CC. SCH51344-induced reversal of Ras-transformation is accompanied by the specific inhibition of the Ras and Rac-dependent cell morphology pathway. Oncogene. 1997;15:2553-2560[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

220. Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Krush AJ, et al. Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1313-1316[Abstract/Free Full Text].

221. Verhuel HM, Panigrahy D, Yuan J, D'Amato RJ. Combination oral antiangiogenic therapy with thalidomide and sulindac inhibits tumour growth in rabbits. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:114-118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

222. Herrmann C, Block C, Geisen C, et al. Sulindac sulfide inhibits Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998;17:1769-1776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

223. Schulte TW, Blagosklonny MV, Romanova L, et al. Destabilization of Raf-1 by geldanamycin leads to disruption of the Raf-1-MEK-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:5839-5845[Abstract].

224. Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of an HSP90-geldanamycin complex: targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell. 1997;89:239-250[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

225. Koera K, Nakamura K, Nakao K, et al. K-ras is essential for the development of the mouse embryo. Oncogene. 1997;15:1151-1159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

226. Johnson L, Greenbaum D, Cichowski K, et al. K-ras is an essential gene in the mouse with partial functional overlap with N-ras. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2468-2481[Abstract/Free Full Text].

227. Umanoff H, Edelmann W, Pellicer A, Kucherlapati R. The murine N-ras gene is not essential for growth and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1709-1713[Abstract/Free Full Text].

228. Casey S, Dautry F. Inactivation of the murine N-ras gene by gene targeting. Oncogene. 1992;12:2525-2528.

229. Qiu RG, Chen J, McCormick F, Symons M. A role for Rho in Ras transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:11781-11785[Abstract/Free Full Text].

230. Khosravi-Far R, Solski PA, Clark GJ, Kinch MS, Der CJ. Activation of Rac1, RhoA and mitogen-activated protein kinases is required for Ras transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:6443-6453[Abstract].

231. Khosravi-Far R, White MA, Westwick JK, et al. Oncogenic Ras activation of Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase-independent pathways is sufficient to cause tumorigenic transformation. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:3923-3933[Abstract].

© 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
T. Akagi, S. Ogawa, M. Dugas, N. Kawamata, G. Yamamoto, Y. Nannya, M. Sanada, C. W. Miller, A. Yung, S. Schnittger, et al.
Frequent genomic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome with normal karyotype
Haematologica, February 1, 2009; 94(2): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Raponi, J. E. Lancet, H. Fan, L. Dossey, G. Lee, I. Gojo, E. J. Feldman, J. Gotlib, L. E. Morris, P. L. Greenberg, et al.
A 2-gene classifier for predicting response to the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2589 - 2596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.-L. Harousseau, J. E. Lancet, J. Reiffers, B. Lowenberg, X. Thomas, F. Huguet, P. Fenaux, S. Zhang, W. Rackoff, P. De Porre, et al.
A phase 2 study of the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, June 15, 2007; 109(12): 5151 - 5156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Fenaux, A. Raza, G. J. Mufti, C. Aul, U. Germing, H. Kantarjian, L. Cripe, R. Kerstens, P. De Porre, and R. Kurzrock
A multicenter phase 2 study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in intermediate- to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
Blood, May 15, 2007; 109(10): 4158 - 4163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Dai, P. Khanna, S. Chen, X.-Y. Pei, P. Dent, and S. Grant
Statins synergistically potentiate 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) lethality in human leukemia and myeloma cells by disrupting Ras farnesylation and activation
Blood, May 15, 2007; 109(10): 4415 - 4423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Raponi, J.-L. Harousseau, J. E. Lancet, B. Lowenberg, R. Stone, Y. Zhang, W. Rackoff, Y. Wang, and D. Atkins
Identification of Molecular Predictors of Response in a Study of Tipifarnib Treatment in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 2254 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Parikh, R. Subrahmanyam, and R. Ren
Oncogenic NRAS rapidly and efficiently induces CMML- and AML-like diseases in mice
Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2349 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. M. Kornblau, M. Womble, Y. H. Qiu, C. E. Jackson, W. Chen, M. Konopleva, E. H. Estey, and M. Andreeff
Simultaneous activation of multiple signal transduction pathways confers poor prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia
Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2358 - 2365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. Arana-Yi, A. Quintas-Cardama, F. Giles, D. Thomas, A. Carrasco-Yalan, J. Cortes, H. Kantarjian, and S. Verstovsek
Advances in the Therapy of Chronic Idiopathic Myelofibrosis
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 929 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. Milan, C. Charalambous, R. Elhag, T. C. Chen, W. Li, S. Guan, F. M. Hofman, and R. Zidovetzki
Multiple signaling pathways are involved in endothelin-1-induced brain endothelial cell migration
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): C155 - C164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Frohling, C. Scholl, D. G. Gilliland, and R. L. Levine
Genetics of Myeloid Malignancies: Pathogenetic and Clinical Implications
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2005; 23(26): 6285 - 6295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. S. Tallman, D. G. Gilliland, and J. M. Rowe
Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1154 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Gomez-Benito, I. Marzo, A. Anel, and J. Naval
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor BMS-214662 Induces Apoptosis in Myeloma Cells through PUMA Up-Regulation, Bax and Bak Activation, and Mcl-1 Elimination
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 1991 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Cortes, S. Faderl, E. Estey, R. Kurzrock, D. Thomas, M. Beran, G. Garcia-Manero, A. Ferrajoli, F. Giles, C. Koller, et al.
Phase I Study of BMS-214662, a Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor in Patients With Acute Leukemias and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2805 - 2812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Dorrell, K. Takenaka, M. D. Minden, R. G. Hawley, and J. E. Dick
Hematopoietic Cell Fate and the Initiation of Leukemic Properties in Primitive Primary Human Cells Are Influenced by Ras Activity and Farnesyltransferase Inhibition
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2004; 24(16): 6993 - 7002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
D. E. Spaner
Amplifying cancer vaccine responses by modifying pathogenic gene programs in tumor cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 76(2): 338 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Yamaguchi, C. Zhou, A. Nanda, and J. H. Zhang
Ras Protein Contributes to Cerebral Vasospasm in a Canine Double-Hemorrhage Model
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1750 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. J. Mackay, R. Hoekstra, F. A. L. M. Eskens, W. J. Loos, D. Crawford, M. Voi, A. Van Vreckem, T. R. J. Evans, and J. Verweij
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor BMS-214662 in Combination with Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 10(8): 2636 - 2644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
A. F. List, J. Vardiman, J.-P. J. Issa, and T. M. DeWitte
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Hematology, January 1, 2004; 2004(1): 297 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Kurzrock, H. M. Kantarjian, J. E. Cortes, N. Singhania, D. A. Thomas, E. F. Wilson, J. J. Wright, E. J. Freireich, M. Talpaz, and S. M. Sebti
Farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in myelodysplastic syndrome: clinical and biologic activities in the phase 1 setting
Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4527 - 4534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. W. C. J. van de Donk, D. Schotte, M. M. J. Kamphuis, A. M. W. van Marion, B. van Kessel, A. C. Bloem, and H. M. Lokhorst
Protein Geranylgeranylation Is Critical for the Regulation of Survival and Proliferation of Lymphoma Tumor Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 9(15): 5735 - 5748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Ochiai, R. Uchida, S.-i. Fuchida, A. Okano, M. Okamoto, E. Ashihara, T. Inaba, N. Fujita, H. Matsubara, and C. Shimazaki
Effect of farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 on the growth of fresh and cloned myeloma cells in vitro
Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3349 - 3353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. W. C. J. van de Donk, M. M. J. Kamphuis, B. van Kessel, H. M. Lokhorst, and A. C. Bloem
Inhibition of protein geranylgeranylation induces apoptosis in myeloma plasma cells by reducing Mcl-1 protein levels
Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3354 - 3362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. S. Clark, L. Zhong, D. Filiault, S. Perman, Z. Ren, M. Gould, and X. Yang
Anti-Leukemia Effect of Perillyl Alcohol in Bcr/Abl-Transformed Cells Indirectly Inhibits Signaling through Mek in a Ras- and Raf-Independent Fashion
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4494 - 4504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Selleri, J. P. Maciejewski, N. Montuori, P. Ricci, V. Visconte, B. Serio, L. Luciano, and B. Rotoli
Involvement of nitric oxide in farnesyltransferase inhibitor-mediated apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia cells
Blood, August 15, 2003; 102(4): 1490 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. A. Adjei, G. A. Croghan, C. Erlichman, R. S. Marks, J. M. Reid, J. A. Sloan, H. C. Pitot, S. R. Alberts, R. M. Goldberg, L. J. Hanson, et al.
A Phase I Trial of the Farnesyl Protein Transferase Inhibitor R115777 in Combination with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2520 - 2526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. C. Platanias
Map kinase signaling pathways and hematologic malignancies
Blood, June 15, 2003; 101(12): 4667 - 4679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. L. Baker, H. Zheng, J. Walker, J. L. Coloff, and J. E. Buss
Distinct Rates of Palmitate Turnover on Membrane-bound Cellular and Oncogenic H-Ras
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19292 - 19300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. A. Adjei, A. Mauer, L. Bruzek, R. S. Marks, S. Hillman, S. Geyer, L. J. Hanson, J. J. Wright, C. Erlichman, S. H. Kaufmann, et al.
Phase II Study of the Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor R115777 in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 21(9): 1760 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Nakajima, T. Tauchi, M. Sumi, W. R. Bishop, and K. Ohyashiki
Efficacy of SCH66336, a Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor, in Conjunction with Imatinib against BCR-ABL-positive Cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2003; 2(3): 219 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Cortes, M. Albitar, D. Thomas, F. Giles, R. Kurzrock, A. Thibault, W. Rackoff, C. Koller, S. O'Brien, G. Garcia-Manero, et al.
Efficacy of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in chronic myeloid leukemia and other hematologic malignancies
Blood, March 1, 2003; 101(5): 1692 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
G. Mufti, A. F. List, S. D. Gore, and A. Y.L. Ho
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 176 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Bezombes, A. de Thonel, A. Apostolou, T. Louat, J.-P. Jaffrezou, G. Laurent, and A. Quillet-Mary
Overexpression of Protein Kinase Czeta Confers Protection Against Antileukemic Drugs by Inhibiting the Redox-Dependent Sphingomyelinase Activation
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2002; 62(6): 1446 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Chatterjee, D. Honemann, S. Lentzsch, K. Bommert, C. Sers, P. Herrmann, S. Mathas, B. Dorken, and R. C. Bargou
In the presence of bone marrow stromal cells human multiple myeloma cells become independent of the IL-6/gp130/STAT3 pathway
Blood, October 16, 2002; 100(9): 3311 - 3318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. K. Dy and A. A. Adjei
Novel Targets for Lung Cancer Therapy: Part I
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2002; 20(12): 2881 - 2894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. George, A. Afek, P. Keren, I. Herz, I. Goldberg, R. Haklai, Y. Kloog, and G. Keren
Functional Inhibition of Ras by S-trans,trans-Farnesyl Thiosalicylic Acid Attenuates Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice
Circulation, May 21, 2002; 105(20): 2416 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. O. Iversen, P. D. Emanuel, and M. Sioud
Targeting Raf-1 gene expression by a DNA enzyme inhibits juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia cell growth
Blood, May 13, 2002; 99(11): 4147 - 4153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. F. List
New Approaches to the Treatment of Myelodysplasia
Oncologist, April 1, 2002; 7(90001): 39 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. Russo, C. Ottoboni, D. Malacarne, A. Crippa, J.-F. Riou, and P. M. O'Connor
Nonpeptidomimetic Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor RPR-115135 Increases Cytotoxicity of 5-Fluorouracil: Role of p53
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2002; 300(1): 220 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. E. Karp, J. E. Lancet, S. H. Kaufmann, D. W. End, J. J. Wright, K. Bol, I. Horak, M. L. Tidwell, J. Liesveld, T. J. Kottke, et al.
Clinical and biologic activity of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias: a phase 1 clinical-laboratory correlative trial
Blood, June 1, 2001; 97(11): 3361 - 3369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. A. Adjei, J. N. Davis, L. M. Bruzek, C. Erlichman, and S. H. Kaufmann
Synergy of the Protein Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor SCH66336 and Cisplatin in Human Cancer Cell Lines
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1438 - 1445.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. A. Morgan, O. Dolp, and C. W. M. Reuter
Cell-cycle-dependent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK-1/2) in myeloid leukemia cell lines and induction of growth inhibition and apoptosis by inhibitors of RAS signaling
Blood, March 15, 2001; 97(6): 1823 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. G. Peters, R. R. Hoover, M. J. Gerlach, E. Y. Koh, H. Zhang, K. Choe, P. Kirschmeier, W. R. Bishop, and G. Q. Daley
Activity of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor SCH66336 against BCR/ABL-induced murine leukemia and primary cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
Blood, March 1, 2001; 97(5): 1404 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
B. J. Druker, C. L. Sawyers, R. Capdeville, J. M. Ford, M. Baccarani, and J. M. Goldman
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 87 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors
Right arrow Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020