|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEOPLASIA
From the Department of Adult Oncology, Dana Farber
Cancer Institute; and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, MA; Bayer Diagnostics, Walpole, MA; Academic Hospital, Vrije
Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Medical
Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Soluble MUC1 (sMUC1) levels are elevated in many MUC1+
cancers. We and others have shown that MUC1 is expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) plasma cells and B cells. In this study, we measured sMUC1
levels in bone marrow (BM) plasma from 71 MM patients and 21 healthy
donors (HDs), and in peripheral blood (PB) plasma from 42 MM
patients and 13 HDs using an immunoassay that detects the CA27.29
epitope of MUC1. sMUC1 levels were found to be significantly greater
(mean 31.76 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) in MM patient BM plasma
versus HD BM plasma (mean 9.68 U/mL, range 0.65 to 39.83 U/mL)
(P < .001). Importantly, BM plasma sMUC1 levels were
related to tumor burden because sMUC1 levels were significantly higher for MM patients with active disease (34.62 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) versus MM patients with minimal residual disease (16.16 U/mL,
range 5.7 to 56.68 U/mL) (P = .0026). sMUC1 levels were
also elevated in the PB plasma of MM patients (32.79 U/mL, range 4.15 to 148.84 U/mL) versus HDs (18.47 U/mL, range 8.84 to 42.49)
(P = .0052). Lastly, circulating immunglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to MUC1 were measured in 114 MM patients and 31 HDs,
because natural antibodies to MUC1 have been detected in patients with
other MUC1-bearing malignancies. These studies demonstrated lower
levels of circulating IgM (P < .001) and IgG (P = .078) antibodies to MUC1 in MM patients compared
with HDs. Our data therefore show that in MM patients, sMUC1 levels are elevated and correlate with disease burden, whereas anti-MUC1 antibody
levels are decreased.
(Blood. 2000;96:3147-3153) MUC1 is a highly glycosylated transmembrane protein
that is normally present on the luminal surface of secretory
glands.1 In contrast to healthy glandular tissues, many
adenocarcinomas (breast, ovary, pancreas, and lung) express a
hypoglycosylated form of MUC1.1 A soluble form of MUC1
(sMUC1, CA 15.3, CA27.29 antigen) has been detected in breast milk,
peripheral blood, urine, and supernatants from cultures of
MUC1+ cancer cell lines and primary cancer
cells.1-4 sMUC1 appears to represent a truncated form of
MUC1 that lacks the cytoplasmic domain of membrane bound, full-length
MUC1.5 The mechanism by which sMUC1 is formed needs to be
clarified but may result from alternative splicing of the MUC1 gene
product, leading to the production of a secreted form of
MUC1,6 or from proteolytic cleavage of full-length,
membrane-bound MUC1 by an undefined mechanism.5 Increased
levels of sMUC1 have been found in peripheral blood (PB) plasma and
serum of patients with adenocarcinomas,7-13 which correlate with tumor burden.10-13 Assays for the detection
of sMUC1 (CA15.3, CA27.29) have been cleared by the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for use in monitoring disease activity in patients
with breast cancer.
The function of MUC1 remains to be defined. From an immunologic
standpoint, both an immunostimulatory14-16 and an
immunoinhibitory17,18 role have been proposed for
membrane-bound MUC1. For sMUC1, an immunoinhibitory role has been
ascribed because sMUC1 inhibits human T-cell
proliferation19,20 and natural killer cell activity in
vitro.21 These studies suggest that sMUC1 may be an
important immunosuppressive agent in patients with MUC1-bearing
malignancies, as evidenced by the poor response to active specific
immunotherapy in patients with metastatic adenocarcinomas who have
highly elevated sMUC1 levels.22 Therefore, determining
sMUC1 levels in multiple myeloma (MM) patients may be important from an
immunobiologic standpoint.
We and others have shown that MUC1 is expressed on the cell surface of
most MM cell lines, MM patient plasma cells and circulating B cells,
and plasmacytomas.14,23-26 In contrast to the
hypoglycosylated form of MUC1 expressed on adenocarcinomas, MUC1 on
most MM cell lines, MM patient plasma cells, and circulating B cells is
expressed as a more underglycosylated or core protein
form.26 In addition, sMUC1 has also been detected in PB
plasma of MM patients by the use of a noncommercial enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA).14 In this study, we
determined whether sMUC1 levels are elevated in MM patients using an
FDA-cleared immunoassay that recognizes the CA27.29 MUC1
epitope.13 We show that the CA27.29 epitope is present on
most MM cell lines, fresh MM patient plasma cells, and circulating MM
patient B cells, and that sMUC1 is present in the supernatants of MM
cell lines in culture. We further demonstrate that sMUC1 levels are
elevated in both bone marrow (BM) and PB plasma of MM patients in
comparison to healthy donors (HDs), and that BM sMUC1 levels are
associated with tumor burden in MM patients. In addition to examining
sMUC1 levels, we also determined whether natural antibodies to MUC1
circulated in MM patients because both immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG
anti-MUC1 antibodies are present in patients with various MUC1-bearing
malignancies.27-30 Moreover, natural anti-MUC1 antibodies
may be protective, because the survival of ovarian and early breast
cancer patients is favorably influenced by the presence of a humoral
response to MUC1.27,28 Interestingly, levels of IgM
anti-MUC1 antibodies, as have been reported in ovarian cancer patients,
were inversely correlated with sMUC1.27
Patients
Antibodies
Cell lines and culture conditions ARH-77, HL-60, RPMI 8226, U-266, and ZR-75-1 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). OCI My-5 cells36 were kindly provided by Dr H. A. Messner (Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Canada); IL-6 transfected S6B45 MM cells37 were kindly provided by Dr T. Kishimoto (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). MM.1S cells38 were kindly provided by Dr Steven Rosen (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL). MM cells (except for OCI My-5 cells) and HL-60 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). OCI My-5 MM cells were cultured in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (Gibco). ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium. All media contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Logan, UT) and was supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin (Gibco).Phenotypic analyses of cell lines and immunofluorescence MM and other tumor cell lines were characterized by flow cytometry for cell surface MUC1 expression. The 106 cells were incubated with either anti-MUC1 or isotype control mAbs (5.0 µg) for 45 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated for 45 minutes with 2.0 µg of goat antimouse fluorescein-conjugated mAb (Coulter). Cells were next washed and fixed with 1% formaldehyde PBS. Staining intensities were defined by comparing differences in log fluorescence for anti-MUC1 mAbs versus isotype control mAb by the use of the following criteria: (0), no difference; (weak,+), less than1 log-fold difference; (moderate,++), 1 or greater but less than 2 log difference; and (strong,+++), 2 or greater log difference.Phenotypic analysis of patient cells BM or PB aspirates were collected into heparinized vacutainer tubes and centrifuged over a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (Pharmacia, Sweden). PB mononuclear cells (MCs) from MM patients and HDs were examined by 2-color immunofluorescence using B4-FITC and either B27.29, AR20.5, VU-4H5, or VU-3C6 mAbs, or an isotype-matched control mAb. Cells were washed and then stained with goat antimouse Ig conjugated to quantum red (Sigma, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) as previously described.26 MUC1 expression on BM plasma cells from MM patients and HDs was identified by multicolor immunofluorescence by gating for cells that were CD38hi CD45RA /lo
with moderate-to-high forward light scatter.26
Soluble MUC1 immunoassay BM or PB aspirates were collected into heparinized vacutainer tubes and centrifuged. Collected plasma was quickly frozen and maintained in a 80°C freezer, and thawed at the time of assay. sMUC1 levels were determined by use of ACS:180 BR assay (Bayer Diagnostics), an automated competitive immunoassay that detects the
CA27.29 epitope of MUC1.13 Briefly, the ACS:180 BR assay uses direct chemiluminescent technology to detect and quantitate sMUC1.
The murine mAb B27.29 used in this assay binds to the CA27.29 epitope
present on the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) region of
MUC1.31,33 B27.29 is labeled with acridium ester, permitting chemiluminescence. sMUC1 in a sample competes with solid
phase-bound purified MUC1 derived from culture supernatants of ZR-75-1
breast cancer cells. An inverse relationship exists between the amount
of sMUC1 present in a patient's sample and the amount of relative
light units (RLUs) detected. RLUs are converted to units per milliliter
by plotting RLUs against a standard curve calibrated for each run using
highly purified sMUC1. The range of sMUC1 detection for the ACS:180 BR
assay is 3.5 to 450 U/mL.
Tissue culture studies For detection of sMUC1 in tissue culture studies, CA27.29+ RPMI 8226 and S6B45 MM cells, CA27.29-HS Sultan MM cells, and CA27.29+ ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells were grown in human plasma. sMUC1 released from ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells is detected by the ACS:BR180 assay, and highly purified sMUC1 from this cell line is used as a calibrator for this assay. Human plasma was used as a culture medium in this detection assay, because the ACS:BR180 assay detects only sMUC1 in serum or plasma, but not in medium alone. To validate this assay, we measured sMUC1 in supernatants of MM cell lines and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells grown in either medium or human plasma. sMUC1 was only detectable in supernatants when CA27.29+ cells were grown in human plasma. Growth of MM and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells was similar in human plasma and in RPMI medium plus 10% FBS, evidenced by trypan blue and propidium iodide staining. Culture supernatants were collected after 48 hours of cell growth, and frozen at80°C until
sMUC1 levels were determined. Plasma alone from the same lots was
assayed for baseline measurement of sMUC1.
MUC1 antibody assays Circulating antibodies to MUC1 were determined by use of an ELISA, as previously described.28,36 Briefly, a 60-mer peptide corresponding to 3 tandem repeats of the MUC1 peptide conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA) is adsorbed in alternate rows with BSA-only adsorbed wells in 96-well plates. After overnight adsorption, wells were incubated with BSA to block nonspecific adsorption sites. Serum samples were diluted 1:100 (for IgG determinations) and 1:500 (for IgM determinations) and incubated overnight. Immunoglobulins bound to peptides were detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antihuman IgG or IgM (DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted 1:10 000. Tetramethylbenzidine was used as a substrate and the reaction was quantified at 450 nm in an ELISA reader. Each serum sample was tested separately for IgM and IgG antibodies. Assays for each sample were performed in duplicate, and results calculated as the mean difference between readings in optical density (OD) units in experimental and control wells. A 4-point standard curve was made for each plate using the HuHMFG1 (1, 05, 0.25, and 0.125 µg/mL) and 2F8 (100, 30, 15, and 5 ng/mL), antibodies for the IgG and IgM determinations, respectively. An arbitrary value of "1" was ascribed to the lowest concentration of the standard antibody and the value of the samples tested was calculated within each plate in relation to the standard curve by least-square regression analysis. The samples with values falling outside the linear region of the curve were retested at higher dilutions. Soluble MUC1 levels were concurrently determined in samples analyzed for IgM and IgG anti-MUC1 antibodies by use of the Enzymum-Test CA15.3 assay (Boerhringer Mannheim, Tutzing, Germany).13Biostatistics The statistical significance of differences in measured values was determined with the 2-tailed Student t test using the Microsoft Excel program. A P-value of .05 or less was considered significant. Average values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Expression of the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope on multiple myeloma cell lines Because many anti-MUC1 mAbs show specificity for certain MUC1 forms31,33 and MM plasma and B cells are known to express MUC1 core protein epitopes,26 we first determined whether the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope was expressed on MM cells. Expression of CA27.29 was determined on 8 MM cell lines, ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells, and HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells using indirect flow cytometric analysis. ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells, known to express the CA27.29 epitope, were used as a positive control31; HL-60 cells, which lack MUC1,26 were used as a negative control. As shown in Figure 1, 6 of 8 MM cell lines (ARH-77, IM-9, OCI My-5, RPMI 8226, S6B45, U-266, but not HS Sultan and MM.1S cells) expressed the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope. The intensity of CA27.29 expression was strong on S6B45 and U-266 MM cells; moderate on IM9, OCI My-5, and RPMI 8226 MM cells; and weak for ARH-77 MM cells. CA27.29 was moderately expressed on ZR-75-1 cells (Figure 1) and absent on HL-60 cells (not shown).
Expression of the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope on multiple myeloma patient plasma cells and B cells We next compared expression of the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope on freshly obtained BM plasma cells from MM patients versus HDs. BM plasma cells (CD38hi 45RA/lo scattermod/hi)
from MM patients and HDs were analyzed for MUC1 expression using 4 MUC1
directed antibodies: B27.29, AR20.5, VU-4H5, and VU-3C6.18 As can be seen in Table 1, 67% ± 15%
of BM plasma cells from 5 MM patients expressed CA27.29, whereas fewer
(38%-54%) patient BM plasma cells expressed the MUC1 epitopes
targeted by AR20.5, VU-4H5, and VU-3C6 mAbs. Importantly, significantly
fewer (13% ± 3%, P = .04) HD BM plasma cells
expressed CA27.29, relative to patient BM plasma cells. Intensity of
CA27.29 expression on patient and HD BM plasma cells is shown in Figure
2. CA27.29 expression was moderately to
strongly expressed on patient BM plasma cells and weakly expressed or
absent on HD plasma cells.
B cells from MM patients and HDs were also examined for CA27.29
expression. In our previous report,26 MM patients and HDs were found to express MUC1 on many of their circulating B cells (49%-64%), evidenced by staining with the VU-4H5 and VU-3C6 mAbs. CA27.29 expression on MM patient B cells (70% ± 6%) was
significantly greater than on HD B cells (4% ± 1%)
(P = .007). Hence, these studies demonstrate that the
majority of MM patient plasma cells and B cells express CA27.29,
whereas most HD plasma cells and B cells lack CA27.29 expression. As
shown in Figure 3, CA27.29 expression on
MM patient B cells was moderate to strong, whereas CA27.29 expression
was either weak or absent on HD B cells.
Detection of soluble MUC1 in multiple myeloma and breast cancer cell cultures We next determined whether MM cells, like ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells, release sMUC1 that is detected by the ACS:BR180 immunoassay. CA27.29+ RPMI 8226 and S6B45 MM cells, as well as CA27.29-HS Sultan MM cells, were cultured in human plasma for 48 hours, and sMUC1 levels determined in supernatants taken from these cultures. Supernatants from CA27.29+ ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells cultured in human plasma were used as positive controls, and human plasma from the same lot used to determine baseline sMUC1 levels. As can be seen in Figure 4, sMUC1 was detected in the culture supernatants of CA27.29+ RPMI 8226 (25.20 ± 0.96 U/mL) and S6B45 (30.00 ± 3.61 U/mL) MM cells, and in the supernatants of CA27.29+ ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells (17.92 ± 2.11 U/mL). In contrast, sMUC1 levels from CA27.29-HS Sultan cells (11.45 ± 2.06 U/mL) were similar to control plasma (9.97 ± 0.16 U/mL) (P = .314) (Figure 4). sMUC1 levels were significantly lower in both control plasma (P < .003) and in HS Sultan culture supernatants (P < .02) than in culture supernatants of either RPMI 8226 and S6B45 MM cells, or ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells.
Determination of sMUC1 levels in multiple myeloma patient bone marrow plasma and correlation with tumor burden Because tumor cells in MM predominate in the BM, we initially set out to measure sMUC1 levels in the BM plasma from both MM patients and HDs. As seen in Figure 5, sMUC1 levels were significantly higher in MM patient BM plasma (mean 31.76 U/mL, range 5.69-142.48 U/mL) compared with HD BM plasma (mean 9.68 U/mL, range 0.65-39.83 U/mL) (P < .001). BM plasma sMUC1 was also significantly higher in MM patients with active disease (34.62 U/mL, range 5.69-142.48 U/mL) than in MM patients with MRD (16.16 U/mL, range 5.7-56.68 U/mL) (P = .0026). sMUC1 was 16 U/mL or less in 95% of HDs and 73% of MM patients with MRD. In contrast, 80% of MM patients with active disease had BM sMUC1 levels of greater than 16 U/mL.
Determination of sMUC1 levels in multiple myeloma patient peripheral blood plasma sMUC1 levels were next assessed in PB plasma samples taken from both MM patients and HDs. As seen in Figure 6, sMUC1 levels were higher in the PB plasma of MM patients (32.79 U/mL, range 4.15-148.84) when compared with the PB plasma of HDs (18.47 U/mL, range 8.84-42.49 U/mL) (P = .0052). To determine the relationship of sMUC1 levels in both PB and BM plasma in MM patients, sMUC1 levels were measured in 15 MM patients in whom PB and BM plasma were obtained simultaneously (Figure 6). These studies demonstrated that sMUC1 levels were higher for BM plasma (43.40 U/mL, range 7.23-142.48 U/mL) than in PB plasma (31.63 U/mL, range 4.15-148.84 U/mL); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .167), and it remains possible that small blood vessel breakage occurring during the BM biopsies may have led to BM sample dilution by PB. When intrapatient differences were examined, 9 of 15 MM patients (60%) exhibited higher BM versus PB sMUC1 levels, whereas the remaining 6 of 15 MM patients (40%) had higher PB versus BM sMUC1 levels.
Detection of anti-MUC1 antibodies in multiple myeloma patients Because anti-MUC1 antibodies circulate in patients with other MUC1-bearing malignancies, we next determined the levels of IgM and IgG anti-MUC1 antibody levels in both MM patients and HDs. Both IgM and IgG antibodies to MUC1 were detected in MM patients; however, the mean levels of both IgM- and IgG-circulating antibodies were lower than those detected in HDs (Table 2). Concurrently, we also measured sMUC1 levels by using the CA15.3 assay in the same MM patient and HD samples that were used to determine anti-MUC1 antibody levels. Analogous to our results with the CA27.29 assay, sMUC1 were significantly higher in MM patients versus HDs (P < .001), and mean sMUC1 levels were inversely related to mean anti-MUC1 antibody levels among MM patients and HDs (Table 1).
We and others have previously reported that MM patient plasma cells14,23-26 and B cells26 express MUC1. Reports of elevated sMUC1 levels in patients with MUC1-bearing adenocarcinomas7-13 prompted us to measure this factor in MM patient BM and PB plasma using an immunoassay that detects the CA27.29 epitope of MUC1. The CA27.29 epitope was identified on most MM cell lines (75%), MM patient plasma cells (67%), and MM patient circulating B cells (70%), but only expressed on a minority of HD plasma cells (13%) and circulating B cells (4%). The predominant expression of CA27.29 on MM cells may facilitate detection of MM-associated versus healthy cell-derived sMUC1, as has been reported in patients with adenocarcinomas.38 Expression of the CA27.29 epitope on MM plasma cells and B cells may also be important in understanding clonality in MM. Prior studies have shown that circulating MM patient B cells have identical IgH rearrangements and similar chromosomal abnormalities, N-ras mutations, and CD45RO isoforms as autologous plasma cells, suggesting that these circulating B cells (termed clonotypic B cells) are within the malignant clone.39-46 The finding that CA27.29 is expressed on circulating MM patient B cells and plasma cells, coupled with its absence on HD B cells and plasma cells, further suggests that circulating B cells in MM patients are different than healthy B cells and may therefore be within the malignant clone. In addition to detecting the CA27.29 epitope on MM cell lines, as well as MM patient plasma cells and B cells, we also identified this antigen in the culture supernatants of CA27.29 epitope-positive RPMI 8226 and S6B45 MM cells. These studies therefore show that the ACS:BR180 immunoassay, which is FDA cleared, is capable of detecting sMUC1 released by MM cells. Using this immunoassay, we showed that sMUC1 is detected at significantly higher levels in the BM and PB plasma of MM patients versus HDs. These findings were confirmed with the CA15.3 assay that targets the 115D8 and DF3 MUC1 antigen, the latter of which is widely expressed on MM cells.26 These findings are also consistent with the earlier reports of Takahashi et al,14 who measured sMUC1 levels in MM patients and HDs using the MUSE11 mAb. We demonstrated 3-fold higher mean levels of sMUC1 in the BM plasma of MM patients versus HDs using the CA27.29 assay. Importantly, we then correlated sMUC1 levels with extent of disease. MM patients with active disease showed significantly higher mean levels of BM plasma sMUC1 when compared with MM patients with minimal disease or HDs. Given our demonstration of CA27.29 on MM plasma cells and B cells, these higher levels of sMUC1 in active MM patients may reflect a greater burden of MM cells (MM plasma cells, MM B cells, or both). Although these malignant cells may be the source of sMUC1, it also remains possible that MM cells trigger release of sMUC1 from other cells which contribute, at least in part, to the elevated sMUC1 levels found in MM patients. Our finding that sMUC1 levels are elevated in concomitant BM and PB plasma patient samples suggests that measuring PB sMUC1 may have clinical utility, which must be assessed in future large prospective clinical trials. Interestingly, sMUC1 levels were negatively correlated to anti-MUC1 antibody levels, particularly for IgM anti-MUC1 antibody levels in MM patients. Richards et al27 have similarly reported an inverse relationship of sMUC1 levels to IgM anti-MUC1 antibody levels in ovarian cancer patients. Because sMUC1 may circulate in complex with anti-MUC1 antibodies,9 decreased circulating antibodies to MUC1 in MM patients may result from immune complex formation and deposition, from binding to MUC1-bearing tumor cells, or from diminished normal immunoglobulin synthesis, which is commonly observed in MM patients. It is also possible that a diminished humoral response to MUC1 in MM patients may result from prior chemotherapy exposure, as suggested by the recent works of Vose et al47 and Kaminski et al48 with the 131I-conjugated murine monoclonal antibody, tositumomab. A greater than 10-fold increase in incidence of human antimurine antibody (HAMA) production to tositumomab was observed in patients receiving this agent as primary therapy versus postchemotherapy.47,48 Lastly, it remains possible that the extent of MUC1 underglycosylation may be insufficient on MM cells to permit cryptic epitope exposure and antibody formation, thereby accounting for diminished MUC1 antibody response in MM patients. In summary, we have detected the CA27.29 MUC1 epitope on a majority of MM cell lines, MM patient cells, and MM B cells. Using an FDA-cleared CA27.29 immunoassay, we have shown that sMUC1 levels are elevated in the BM and PB plasma of MM patients, and that BM sMUC1 levels are related to MM disease burden. In contrast, anti-MUC1 antibody levels were decreased in MM patients. Ongoing studies are examining the immunobiologic role that sMUC1 and anti-MUC1 antibodies play in MM.
Submitted August 16, 1999; accepted June 26, 2000.
Supported by an American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award (S.P.T.), the International Myeloma Foundation (S.P.T.), the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (S.P.T.), the Alberta Cancer Board Research Initiatives Program (L.M.P./A.R.B.), and the Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Research Scientist Award (K.C.A.).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Kenneth C. Anderson, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston MA 02115; e-mail: kenneth_anderson{at}dfci.harvard.edu.
1. Patton S, Gendler SJ, Spicer AP. The epithelial mucin, Muc1, of milk, mammary gland and other tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1241:407-424[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. McGuckin MA, Hurst TG, Ward BG. Heterogeneity in production, secretion, and glycosylation of Muc1 epithelial mucin by primary cultures of ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1995;63:412-418[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Burchell J, Gendler S, Taylor-Papadimitriou J, et al.
Development and characterization of breast cancer reactive monoclonal antibodies directed to the core protein of the human milk mucin.
Cancer Res.
1987;47:5476-5482 4. Griffiths B, Gordon A, Burchell J, et al. The breast tumour-associated epithelial mucins and the peanut lectin binding urinary mucins are coded by a single highly polymorphic gene locus `PUM.' Dis Markers. 1988;6:185-194[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 5. Boshell M, Lalani EN, Pemberton L, Burchell J, Gendler S, Taylor-Papadimitriou J. The product of the human Muc1 gene when secreted by mouse cells transfected with the full length cDNA lacks the cytoplasmic tail. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1992;185:1[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Baruch A, Hartmann M, Yoeli M, et al.
The breast cancer associated MUC1 gene generates both a receptor and its cognate binding protein.
Cancer Res.
1999;59:1552-1561 7. Hayes DF, Sekine H, Ohno T, Abe M, Keefe K, Kufe DW. Use of murine monoclonal antibody for detection of circulating DF3 plasma antigen levels in breast cancer patients. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1671-1678. 8. Colomer R, Ruibal A, Genolla J, Salvador L. Circulating CA 15-3 antigen levels in non-mammary malignancies. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:283-286[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 9. Gourevitch MM, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Litvinov SV, et al. Polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1) containing circulating immune complexes in carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:934-938[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Vizcarra E, Lluch A, Cibrian R, et al. Value of CA 15.3 in breast cancer and comparison with CEA and TPA: a study of specificity in disease free follow-up patients and sensitivity in patients at diagnosis of the first metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37:209-216[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Price MR, Clarke AJ, Robertson JFR, O'Sullivan C, Baldwin RW, Blamey RW. Detection of polymorphic epithelial mucins in the serum of systemic breast cancer patients using the monoclonal antibody, NCRC-11. Cancer Immun Immunother. 1990;31:269-273.
12.
Chan DW, Beveridge RA, Muss H, et al.
Use of the Truquant BR radioimmunoassay for early detection of breast cancer recurrence in patients with stage II and stage III disease.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;15:2322-2328
13.
Bon GG, Von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Kenemans P, et al.
Clinical and technical evaluation of ACS BR serum assay of Muc1 gene derived glycoprotein in breast cancer, and comparison with CA 15.3 assays.
Clin Chem.
1997;43:585-593 14. Takahashi T, Makiguchi Y, Hinoda Y, et al. Expression of Muc1 on myeloma cells and induction of HLA unrestricted CTL against Muc1 from a multiple myeloma patient. J Immunol. 1994;153:2102-2109[Abstract].
15.
Barnd DL, Lan M, Metzgar RS, Finn OJ.
Specific, MHC unrestricted recognition of tumor associated mucins by human cytotoxic T cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1989;86:7159-7163 16. Ioannides CG, Fisk B, Jerome KR, Irimura T, Wharton JT, Finn OJ. Cytotoxic T cells from ovarian malignant tumors can recognize polymorphic epithelial mucin core peptides. J Immunol. 1993;151:3693-3703[Abstract]. 17. Hayes DF, Silberstein DS, Rodrique SW, Kufe DW. DF3 antigen, a human epithelial cell mucin, inhibits adhesion of eosinophils to antibody coated targets. J Immunol. 1990;145:962-970[Abstract]. 18. Van de Wiel-Van Kemenade E, Ligtenberg MJL, de Boer AJ, et al. Episialin (Muc1) inhibits cytotoxic lymphocyte-target cell interaction. J Immunol. 1993;151:767-776[Abstract]. 19. Agrawal B, Krantz MJ, Reddish MA, Longenecker BM. Cancer-associated MUC1 mucin inhibits human T-cell proliferation, which is reversible by IL-2. Nat Med. 1998;4:43-49[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Chan AK, Lockhart DC, von Bernstorff W, et al. Soluble MUC1 secreted by human epithelial cancer cells mediates immune suppression by blocking T-cell activation. Int J Cancer. 1999;82:721-726[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Zhang Ke, Sikut R, Hansson GC. A Muc1 mucin secreted from a colon carcinoma cell line inhibits target cell lysis by natural killer cells. Cell Immunol. 1997;176:158-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. MacLean GD, Reddish MA, Longenecker BM. Prognostic significance of preimmunotherapy serum CA27.29 (MUC1) mucin level after active specific immunotherapy of metastatic adenocarcinoma patients. J Immunother. 1997;20:70-79. 23. Zotter S, Hageman PC, Lossnitzer A, Mooi WJ, Hilgers J. Tissue and tumor distribution of human polymorphic epithelial mucin. Cancer Rev. 1988;11/12:55-101. 24. Duperray C, Klein B, Durie BGM, et al. Phenotypic analysis of human myeloma cell lines. Blood. 1989;3:566-572. 25. Al Saati T, Caveriviere P, Gorguet B, Delsol G, Gater KC, Mason DY. Epithelial membrane antigen in hematopoeitic neoplasms. Hum Pathol. 1989;17:533-534.
26.
Treon SP, Mollick JA, Urashima M, et al.
MUC1 core protein is expressed on multiple myeloma cells and is induced by dexamethasone.
Blood.
1999;93:1287-1298 27. Richards E, Devine PL, Quin RJ, Fontenot JD, Ward BG, McGuckin MA. Antibodies reactive with the protein core of MUC1 mucin are present in ovarian cancer patients and healthy women. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1998;46:245-252[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Verstraeten AA, Kenemans P, et al.
Survival in early breast cancer patients is favorably influenced by a natural humoral immune response to polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1).
J Clin Oncol.
2000;18:574-583 29. Von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Gourevitch MM, Kenemans P, et al. Humoral immune response to polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1) in patients with benign and malignant breast tumours. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:1325-1331. 30. Nakamura H, Hinoda Y, Nakagawa N, et al. Detection of circulating anti-MUC1 mucin core protein antibodies in patients with colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:354-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 31. Reddish M, Black N, Almeida A, Suresh MR, Longenecker BM. Epitope mapping of Mab B27.29 within the peptide core of the malignant breast carcinoma-associated mucin antigen coding for the human MUC1 gene. J Tumor Marker Oncol. 1992;7:19-27. 32. Schol DJ, Muelenbroek MFA, Snijdewint FGM, et al. Epitope fingerprinting using overlapping 20-mer peptides of the MUC1 tandem repeat sequence. Tumor Biol. 1998;19:35-42. 33. Price MR, Rye PD, Petrakou E, et al. Summary report on the ISOBM TD-4 workshop: analysis of 56 monoclonal antibodies against the Muc1 mucin. Tumor Biol. 1998;19:1-20. 34. Petrakou E, Murray A, Price MR. Epitope mapping of anti-Muc1 mucin protein core monoclonal antibodies. Tumor Biol. 1998;19:21-29. 35. Qi W, Liu D, Kreutz F, et al. Importance of the xenogeneic nature of antibodies for tumor immunotherapy. [Abstract.] Proc Am Soc Cancer Res. 1999;40:355.
36.
Hitzler JK, Martinez-Valdez H, Bergsagel DB, Minden MD, Messner HA.
Role of interleukin-6 in the proliferation of human multiple myeloma cell lines OCI-My 1 to 7 established from patients with advanced stage of the disease.
Blood.
1991;78:1996-2004 37. Okuno Y, Takahashi T, Suzuki A, et al. Acquisition of growth autonomy and tumorigenicity by an interleukin-6 dependent human myeloma cell line transfected with interleukin-6 cDNA. Exp Hematol. 1992;20:395-400[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
35a.
Moalli PA, Pillay S, Weiner D, Leikin R, Rosen ST.
A mechanism of resistance to glucocorticoids in multiple myeloma: transient expression of a truncated glucocorticoid receptor mRNA.
Blood.
1992;79:213-222 36a. Von Mensdorfff-Pouilly S, Gourevitch MM, Kenemans P, et al. An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of circulating antibodies to polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1). Tumor Biol. 1998;19:186-195. 37a. Hanisch F-G. Specificity clusters of Muc1-reactive mouse monoclonal antibodies. Tumor Biol. 1998;19:111-117. 38. Norum LF, Varaas T, Kierulf B, Nustad K. Carcinoma-associated Muc1 detected by immunoradiometric assays. Tumor Biol. 1998;19:134-146. 39. Takashita M, Kosaka M, Goto T, Saito S. Cellular origin and extent of clonal involvement in multiple myeloma: genetic and phenotypic studies. Br J Haematol. 1994;87:735-742[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
40.
Bergsagel PL, Masellis Smith A, Szczepek A, Mant MJ, Belch AR, Pilarski LM.
In multiple myeloma, clonotypic B lymphocytes are detectable among CD19+ peripheral blood cells expressing CD38, CD56, and monotypic immunoglobulin light chain.
Blood.
1995;85:436-447
41.
Szczepek AJ, Bergsagel PL, Axelsson L, Brown CB, Belch AR, Pilarski LM.
CD34+ cells in the blood of patients with multiple myeloma express CD19 and IgH mRNA and have patient specific IgH rearrangements.
Blood.
1997;89:1824-1833
42.
Szczepek AJ, Seeberger K, Wizniak J, Mant MJ, Belch AR, Pilarski LM.
A high frequency of circulating B cells share clonotypic IgH VDJ rearrangements with autologous bone marrow plasma cells in multiple myeloma, as measured by single cell and in-situ RT-PCR.
Blood.
1998;92:2844-2855 43. Bergsagel PL, Belch AR, Pilarksi LM. The blood B cells and bone marrow plasma cells in a patient with multiple myeloma include cells with the same N-ras mutation. [Abstract.] Blood. 1994;84:524a.
44.
Billadeau D, Ahmann G, Greipp P, Van Ness B.
The bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients contains B cell populations at different stages of differentiation that are clonally related to the malignant plasma cell.
J Exp Med.
1993;178:1023-1031 45. Pilarski LM, Masellis-Smith A, Szczepek A, Mant MJ, Belch AR. Circulating clonotypic B cells in the biology of multiple meloma: speculations on the origin of myeloma. Leuk Lymph. 1996;22:375-383[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
46.
Pilarski LM, Giannakopoulos NV, Szczepek AJ, Masellis AM, Mant MJ, Belch AR.
In multiple myeloma, circulating hyperdiploid B cells have clonotypic IgH rearrangements and may mediate spread of disease.
Clin Cancer Res.
2000;6:585-596
47.
Vose JM, Wahl RL, Saleh M, et al.
Multicenter phase III study of iodine-131 tositumomab for chemotherapy-relapsed/refractory low-grade and transformed low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
J Clin Oncol.
2000;18:1316-1323 48. Kaminski MS, Estes J, Tuck M, et al. Iodine-131 tositumomab therapy for previously untreated follicular lymphoma [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2000;19:5a.
© 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|
  D. B. Rubinstein, M. Karmely, R. Ziv, I. Benhar, O. Leitner, S. Baron, B.-Z. Katz, and D. H. Wreschner MUC1/X Protein Immunization Enhances cDNA Immunization in Generating Anti-MUC1 {alpha}/{beta} Junction Antibodies that Target Malignant Cells Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11247 - 11253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Levitin, O. Stern, M. Weiss, C. Gil-Henn, R. Ziv, Z. Prokocimer, N. I. Smorodinsky, D. B. Rubinstein, and D. H. Wreschner The MUC1 SEA Module Is a Self-cleaving Domain J. Biol. Chem., September 30, 2005; 280(39): 33374 - 33386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H M. Prince, L. Mileshkin, A. Roberts, V. Ganju, C. Underhill, J. Catalano, R. Bell, J. F. Seymour, D. Westerman, P. J. Simmons, et al. A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Thalidomide and Celecoxib for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5504 - 5514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Hayashi, T. Hideshima, M. Akiyama, N. Raje, P. Richardson, D. Chauhan, and K. C. Anderson Ex vivo induction of multiple myeloma-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes Blood, August 15, 2003; 102(4): 1435 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Mileshkin, J. J. Biagi, P. Mitchell, C. Underhill, A. Grigg, R. Bell, J. McKendrick, P. Briggs, J. F. Seymour, K. Lillie, et al. Multicenter phase 2 trial of thalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: adverse prognostic impact of advanced age Blood, July 1, 2003; 102(1): 69 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Z. Rassidakis, A. Goy, L. J. Medeiros, Y. Jiang, A. Thomaides, Y. Remache, F. Cabanillas, A. H. Sarris, and F. Gilles Prognostic Significance of MUC-1 Expression in Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2213 - 2220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Thathiah, C. P. Blobel, and D. D. Carson Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Converting Enzyme/ADAM 17 Mediates MUC1 Shedding J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3386 - 3394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. Mitsiades, S. P. Treon, N. Mitsiades, Y. Shima, P. Richardson, R. Schlossman, T. Hideshima, and K. C. Anderson TRAIL/Apo2L ligand selectively induces apoptosis and overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications Blood, August 1, 2001; 98(3): 795 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||
Top
Abstract
Introduction
