| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,
University of Washington School of Medicine, and Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and
University of Leipzig, Germany.
Toxicities have limited the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell
transplantation (HCT) to younger, medically fit patients. In a canine
HCT model, a combination of postgrafting mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
and cyclosporine (CSP) allowed stable allogeneic engraftment after
minimally toxic conditioning with low-dose (200 cGy) total-body
irradiation (TBI). These findings, together with the known antitumor
effects of donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs), led to the design of this
trial. Forty-five patients (median age 56 years) with hematologic
malignancies, HLA-identical sibling donors, and relative
contraindications to conventional HCT were treated. Immunosuppression
involved TBI of 200 cGy before and CSP/MMF after HCT. DLIs were given
after HCT for persistent malignancy, mixed chimerism, or both. Regimen
toxicities and myelosuppression were mild, allowing 53% of eligible
patients to have entirely outpatient transplantations. Nonfatal graft
rejection occurred in 20% of patients. Grades II to III acute
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 47% of patients with
sustained engraftment. With median follow-up of 417 days, survival was
66.7%, nonrelapse mortality 6.7%, and relapse mortality 26.7%.
Fifty-three percent of patients with sustained engraftment were in
complete remission, including 8 with molecular remissions. This novel
allografting approach, based on the use of postgrafting
immunosuppression to control graft rejection and GVHD, has
dramatically reduced the acute toxicities of allografting. HCT with the
induction of potent graft-versus-tumor effects can be performed in
previously ineligible patients, largely in an outpatient setting.
Future protocol modifications should reduce rejection and GVHD, thereby
facilitating studies of allogeneic immunotherapy for a variety of malignancies.
(Blood. 2001;97:3390-3400) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
is effective treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies.
Current strategies rely on maximally tolerated doses of systemic
chemoradiation to eradicate cancer, and the allografts serve to rescue
patients from treatment-induced marrow aplasia. Associated toxicities
have limited treatment to younger, medically fit patients, with therapy administered on specialized hospital wards. Almost no HCTs have been
done in patients more than 60 years of age, and relatively few in
patients older than 50 years.1 Consequently, median patient ages at HCT for chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are approximately 2 decades younger than median ages at diagnoses.1 Thus,
current allogeneic HCT benefits only a younger minority of patients
with candidate diseases.
At least 2 observations have raised doubts as to whether current
concepts of allogeneic HCT are universally valid. First, marrow-based
malignancies cannot always be eradicated even by the most intensive
pretransplantation therapies.2,3 Second, cures may be
attributed to graft-versus-tumor (GVT) reactions mediated by donor T
cells,4-10 and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) can
induce sustained complete remissions (CRs) of malignancies that
relapsed after HCT.11-16 These observations, together with a better understanding of how to influence immune cell functions, suggested a reevaluation of how to perform HCT. Specifically, the
emphasis is shifting away from relying on high-dose cytotoxic therapy
toward using donors' immune cells for eradicating malignancy. Consequently, some investigators have tested reduced-intensity pretransplantation regimens, although these regimens were still given
for tumor cytoreduction and had significant toxicities, including
temporary severe myelosuppression.17-20
Here, we present a novel concept of allogeneic HCT that uses the
knowledge that both host-versus-graft (HVG) and graft-versus-host (GVH)
reactions are mediated by T cells. The concept relies on optimizing pharmacologic postgrafting immunosuppression to
control both reactions. In canine HCT studies using major
histocompatibility complex-matched littermate donors, the synergistic
combination of the antimetabolite mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and the
T-cell-activation blocker cyclosporine (CSP) prevented
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and reduced HVG reactions, thereby
allowing a reduction of the single-dose pretransplantation total-body
irradiation (TBI) needed for sustained engraftment from 920 cGy to a
nonmyeloablative dose of 200 cGy.21-23 Dogs having
transplantation this way experienced minimal toxicities and mild
pancytopenia, and moreover became stable mixed hematopoietic chimeras.
These observations, together with the known GVT effects of allografts,
allowed us to apply a novel strategy of HLA-identical sibling HCT using
low-dose (200 cGy) TBI/MMF/CSP. In contrast, conventional allografting
regimens typically use TBI doses 6 times higher (at least 1200 cGy)
combined with high-dose chemotherapy (eg, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg). This report describes initial results in 45 patients with hematologic malignancies who were ineligible for conventional HCT because of age or
medical contraindications.
Patients and eligibility
Major eligibility requirements were as follows: (1) indolent
hematologic malignancy or acute leukemia in CR; (2) HLA-identical sibling donor with serologic match at HLA-A, -B, -C, and molecular matching for HLA-DRB124; (3) age greater than 50 years
(greater than 60 years for CML) or relative contraindication to
conventional HCT in younger patients; and (4) creatinine clearance
greater than 50 mL/min, bilirubin less than 2 times normal, and
Karnofsky score more than 50. CLL and lymphoma patients had failed at
least frontline therapy. MM patients had stage II or III disease at diagnosis or disease progression and had had previous chemotherapy. Three additional poor-risk patients had chemotherapy-resistant acute
leukemia (UL607, UL577) and persistent marrow aplasia and aspergillosis
after induction chemotherapy for AML (FH14241).25 Table
1 shows patient and graft
characteristics.
Treatment and evaluations Figure 1 shows the treatment protocol. TBI was given at 7 cGy/min from dual cobalt 60 sources (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) or linear accelerators (Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Leipzig, Stanford University, University of Washington Medical Center). Forty-four patients received 2 Gy TBI alone. One patient (FH14726) with CML received, in addition, fludarabine 30 mg/m2 on days 4, 3, and 2 in an
attempt to reduce the risk of graft rejection. CSP levels were targeted
to the upper therapeutic range (approximately 500 ng/mL; Abbott TDX,
Abbott Park, IL) until day +35. Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis
carinii, fungal infections, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections
was used.26-28 Patients with chronic GVHD requiring
systemic immunosuppression received antibiotic prophylaxis against
P carinii and Pneumococcus. For outpatient transplantations, scheduled follow-up included 2 to 3 clinic visits per
week for the first month and then once or twice per week or as
clinically required thereafter.
Chimerism among peripheral blood (PB) T cells, granulocytes, and unfractionated marrow was assessed at days 28, 56, 84, 180, and 360 after HCT using fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect X and Y chromosomes for recipients of sex-mismatched transplants and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis of polymorphic microsatellite regions for recipients of sex-matched transplants.29 The primary study end point was mixed chimerism at day 28, defined as between 1% and 95% PB donor T cells. Patients with mixed chimerism, no GVHD, and less than 20% increases in donor T cells from day 28 to 56 were eligible for DLI on day +65. In others, monthly chimerism and tumor evaluations were done to assess the need for DLI. DLIs were scheduled to be administered at 2-month intervals starting at 1 × 107 CD3+ cells/kg, with up to 3 subsequent infusions at doses of 3.3 × 107, 1.0 × 108, and 3.3 × 108 CD3+ cells/kg to be given based on the presence of stable mixed chimerism and absence of GVHD, or persistent or progressive disease. Patients who had rapidly progressive tumors early after transplantation or graft rejection were considered treatment failures and were eligible for other therapies including DLI off protocol or second transplantations. Acute and chronic GVHD were graded as described.30,31 Tumor responses were assessed using standard criteria. In patients who achieved CR, PCR was used to detect bcr-abl transcripts (CML)32 or clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements (lymphoid malignancies).33 Statistical analysis Survival and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and mortality from various causes and GVHD were each summarized using cumulative incidence estimates.34 The associations of chimerism values at day 28 with acute GVHD and rejection were examined using logistic regression. Associations of various patient characteristics with acute GVHD and rejection were examined using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous characteristics. The 2 test was used for categorical
characteristics, or Fisher's exact test if assumptions necessary for
the 2 test were not met. Data were analyzed as of April
1, 2000.
Table 2 summarizes the
outcomes.
Regimen-related toxicities and infections No patient experienced regimen-related painful mucositis, severe nausea and vomiting, pulmonary toxicity, cardiac toxicity, hemorrhagic cystitis, or new-onset alopecia. Mild to moderate nausea and diarrhea due to MMF/CSP were common. Serum creatinine elevations to twice baseline values occurred in 59% of patients because of targeting high serum CSP levels, and resolved in most cases. One MM patient (UL625) with preexisting renal dysfunction (serum creatinine 2.3 mg/dL) required hemodialysis. Reversible hyperbilirubinemia to more than 10 mg/dL occurred in 3 patients because of preexisting liver cirrhosis (FH13009), concurrent amphotericin B treatment (FH14241), and isolated liver GVHD (FH14568). Documented bacterial infections requiring intravenous antibiotics occurred in 10 patients (22%) within 60 days after HCT. CMV reactivations were detected in 6 (24%) of 25 CMV-seropositive patients and were managed successfully with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Thirty-two patients were eligible for outpatient transplantation. Others had transplantation at the University of Leipzig (n = 12) or were already hospitalized (n = 1). Seventeen (53%) of the 32 patients did not require hospitalization within 60 days of HCT. The remainder were hospitalized for 1 to 35 days (median 8 days).PB cell changes, allogeneic engraftment, and graft rejection Figure 2 summarizes PB neutrophil and platelet changes to day +30. A median of 0 platelet units (range, 0-38 units) were transfused, and 34 patients (76%) required no transfusions. A median of 2 red blood cell units (range, 0-28 units) were transfused, and 14 patients (31%) required no transfusions. No serious hemolysis occurred in 14 ABO-incompatible transplants. Recipients of 6 major ABO-incompatible transplants (eg, A O) required
0, 0, 0, 10, 23, and 28 red blood cell units.
All patients had initial engraftment (Tables 2 and
3). Based on T-cell engraftment, 86%
were mixed chimeras and 14% were complete chimeras on day 28. This
changed to 79% and 21%, respectively, on day 56. Nine (20%) of 44 patients given TBI/CSP/MMF had graft rejection between 2 and 4 months.
Four had CML, 2 MM, one AML, one CLL, and one myelodysplasia.
Rejections were nonfatal and usually associated with transient minor
disturbances of blood counts (Figure 3),
except for one patient (FH13246) who had 3 weeks of pancytopenia before
recovery. This patient had experienced minimal myelosuppression until
the onset of aplasia at 2 months after transplantation. Day-56
chimerism studies showed T cells to be 65% host and granulocytes
to be 57% host at a time shortly before rejection when PB counts were
not depressed, and these values were increased from 57% (T cells) and
29% (granulocytes) on day 28. Pretransplantation factors predictive of
graft rejection were a lack of intensive preceding therapy and a
diagnosis of CML (Table 4). Low donor
T-cell chimerism at day 28 predicted rejections (Tables
5 6). To
reduce the risk of graft rejection, fludarabine 30 mg · m
Patients with sustained allografts Of 36 patients, 17 (47%) developed acute GVHD, which was grade II in 13 (36%) and grade III in 4 (11%) (Figure 4A). The day-28 levels of donor T-cell chimerism predicted subsequent acute GVHD (Tables 5 and 6), which occurred in all patients with full donor chimerism. With one exception, acute GVHD began after discontinuation of MMF. In most cases, it responded to continuation of CSP and a standard course of methylprednisolone.35 Twenty-three (74%) of 31 evaluable patients developed chronic GVHD; 19 (61%) were treated with systemic immunosuppressive therapy, one with topical steroids, and 3 received no specific therapy.31 The extent of chronic GVHD and organ involvement are shown in Table 2. Of the patients treated for chronic GVHD, 9 had excellent responses, 9 had partial responses (PRs), and 2 were unevaluable because of death. Two patients discontinued therapy without a flare of GVHD.
Status of underlying diseases: patients with graft rejection Eight of 9 patients had persistent disease, and one MM patient (FH13230) achieved CR before relapse (Table 2). Patient FH13246 (MM) experienced a sustained CR of long-standing (30 years) psoriatic arthritis.Status of underlying diseases: patients with sustained engraftment Of 36 patients, 25 were alive, with 19 (53%) in CR, 2 in PR, and 4 without responses (Table 2). Twenty-nine of 36 patients had measurable disease before transplantation, and 19 (66%) achieved CR sometime after HCT. Progression-free survival for the entire group and survival for patients with sustained engraftment are shown in Figure 4C.Five of 6 AML patients having transplantation in first CR or during
aplasia were in remission. Of 2 AML patients in second or third
remission, one died of relapse and one of infection while in remission.
Of 3 patients with refractory acute leukemia, 2 died of relapse and one
remained in remission at more than 23 months. All 5 CML patients were
alive in molecular CR (Figure 5A). Of 7 CLL patients, 3 were in CR including 2 in molecular CR (Figure 5B), one
was in PR, and one had progressive disease. One died of infection while
in molecular CR and one died of progressive disease. Molecular CRs were
first documented 5 to 12 months after transplantation and occurred
gradually (Figure 5A,B). These remissions occurred in all 8 patients
while they were receiving immunosuppressive therapy for management of
GVHD. Of 6 MM patients, 4 were in CR (Figure 5C), one died of
progressive disease, and one died of infection. Of 4 Hodgkin disease
patients, one was in CR, one was alive in relapse, and 2 died of
progressive disease. One NHL patient died of cerebral hemorrhage while
in CR at 2 months. Two patients with Waldenström
macroglobulinemia were alive with stable disease.
Donor lymphocyte infusions Twenty-three patients (51%) underwent the first DLI on days 56 to 326, including all 9 patients who subsequently rejected their grafts. Thus, DLIs given at 1 × 107 CD3+ cells/kg were unable to prevent progression to complete graft rejection. Twelve of 14 remaining patients had measurable disease. Four achieved CR, 5 had no response, and 3 were unevaluable because of concurrent other therapy (n = 2) or early death due to infection (FH14692). Three patients developed their first GVHD after DLI.Survival and causes of death With median follow-up at 417 days (range, 310-769 days), 30 of 45 patients (66.7%) were alive (Figure 4D). Twelve patients (26.7%) died of progressive disease, including 4 from DLI-induced GVHD and infections and 2 after conventional second HCT. Three (6.7%) died of transplantation complications without disease progression, including pneumonia at 2 months (UL625), central nervous system hemorrhage at 2 months (FH14224), and streptococcal sepsis after sinusitis at 1 year while off all systemic immunosuppression (FH12914).
This clinical protocol was a direct translation of preclinical canine HCT studies.22 The new concept for HCT, which relies on GVT effects rather than extreme chemoradiation to eradicate malignancies, has several advantages. First, serious organ damage characteristic of conventional transplantation is avoided. Second, a lack of profound pancytopenia reduces infection risks. These 2 features allow application of HCT to otherwise ineligible patients. Third, there may be an immunologic advantage that is the key to the success of this approach. Specifically, minimally cytotoxic pretransplantation conditioning allows persistence of host antigen-presenting cells, thus enhancing presentation of host minor antigens to donor T cells and initiation of GVT (and GVH) effects. By exploiting postgrafting immunosuppression to control graft rejection, most of the pretransplantation TBI required for engraftment was eliminated in canine studies.22 Encouraged by the effectiveness and safety of these transplantations together with the therapeutic potential of donor lymphocytes,11-16 we initiated this study. Several conclusions are possible. First, the regimen was safe and minimally toxic. Alopecia, severe mucositis, severe protracted pancytopenias, and fatal regimen-related toxicities typical of conventional HCT were not encountered. This allowed 53% of eligible patients to be treated entirely as outpatients, with others having relatively short hospitalizations (median 8 days), as compared with medians of more than 30 days with conventional HCT.36,37 Most patients required neither antibiotic treatment for infections nor platelet transfusions. Given the modest declines in blood counts, it was difficult to estimate the speed of engraftment. However, in one patient who was aplastic at transplantation (FH14241), neutrophils rose to more than 500/µL by day 8 and platelets to more than 20 000/µL by day 13.25 Thus, the degree and exact tempo of myelosuppression induced by 200 cGy TBI in humans not given stem cell support cannot be estimated from this study. However, in dogs given this TBI dose without stem cell transplantation, the granulocyte nadir was 750/µL on day 20 and platelet nadirs were at 16 to 24 days after transplantation. Marrow recovery occurred in 17 of 18 dogs and all 17 survived beyond 30 days, with recovery complete by day 40 for granulocytes and by day 50 for platelets.22 CMV reactivations occurred in only 24% of CMV-seropositive patients, as compared with 79% after conventional transplantation.38 Three patients (6.7%) died of transplantation complications without disease progression. Overall, this toxicity profile was impressive considering the ages, preceding therapies, and preexisting organ dysfunction or infections among patients who were not conventional allografting candidates. These observations support the concept that the use of potent postgrafting immunosuppression permits one to reduce the intensity of pretransplantation immunosuppressive and myelosuppressive therapy, thereby reducing toxicities usually associated with allografting. As with any radiation, there is a risk of late malignancies even from
the low dose rate of 200 cGy TBI used here. Nevertheless, evidence
suggests that this risk might be small. Among 95 673 nuclear workers
exposed to low-level radiation, the excess relative risk of cancer was
estimated to be only Second, stable allogeneic engraftment was achieved in most patients despite using only 200 cGy TBI before transplantation. It is known from canine studies that 200 cGy is by itself not sufficiently immunosuppressive to permit stable allogeneic engraftment. However, when 200 cGy TBI before HCT was combined with postgrafting MMF/CSP, stable engraftment was seen in 11 of 12 dogs, whereas no long-term engraftment was seen with CSP alone. To achieve the same rate of engraftment without postgrafting immunosuppression, 920 cGy TBI was required. Put another way, MMF/CSP after grafting provided a degree of host immunosuppression that was otherwise achieved with more than 700 cGy TBI before transplantation. These considerations suggest that postgrafting CSP/MMF had an important role in facilitating engraftment in this clinical study. Nonfatal graft rejection occurred in 20% of the 44 patients who received TBI/MMF/CSP, and autologous hematopoietic recovery occurred in each case, as in the canine studies,22 providing evidence that host hematopoiesis was not ablated by the conditioning therapy. Rejection episodes occurred at 2 to 4 months, and one patient had 3 weeks of severe pancytopenia before recovery. The relatively large and increasing admixture of host cells, together with relatively normal PB counts shortly before rejection, suggests that TBI-induced suppression was not responsible for pancytopenia in this patient and implicates another mechanism, possibly similar to that observed with DLI-induced aplasia. The factor most closely associated with rejection was the absence of intensive previous chemotherapy. The current approach was most effective for heavily pretreated patients, with 30 of 31 (97%) having sustained engraftment. To reduce the rejection risk, we added the potent immunosuppressive purine analogue fludarabine to the pretransplantation conditioning for one patient reported here, and this approach is being evaluated in further studies. The high-level day-28 T-cell engraftment in CML patient FH14726 together with uniformly stable engraftment in 43 subsequent HLA-identical siblings (unpublished observations) and 11 unrelated donor HCT recipients45 suggests that fludarabine/TBI more effectively prevents rejection than TBI alone. Fludarabine synergizes with radiation to kill tumor cells,46 and this may also be true for its effect on T lymphocytes. It has been a component of most other reported reduced-intensity allografting conditioning regimens.17-19,44 Third, 47% of patients with sustained engraftment developed acute grades II to III GVHD, with no grade IV disease. By comparison, rates of acute GVHD after conventional allografting using standard methotrexate/CSP prophylaxis47 were 35% and 44% among 44648 and 16449 younger patients, respectively, and 60% among 57 older patients (50-60 years) (R. Storb, unpublished data, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center). The lack of stable mixed chimerism in most patients together with the development of GVHD in some patients after discontinuation of CSP on day 35 led us to extend CSP administration to day +56 for better GVHD protection. GVHD was effectively managed in most current patients. Whereas the median onset of acute GVHD was day 16 after conventional transplantation,48 the current median was 40 days. The almost complete absence of GVHD during days of combined MMF/CSP prophylaxis suggests that this is a potent immunosuppressive combination, consistent with canine GVHD studies.50 The contributions of low-intensity pretransplantation conditioning and initial mixed chimerism to the relatively benign courses of GVHD in these older patients remain unclear. Given the importance of inducing GVT effects for successful nonmyeloablative transplantation and the appreciable incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD encountered, GVHD control remains a critical research objective. Because MMF/CSP was given for relatively short periods after transplantation in this study, GVHD control might be improved simply by extending the duration of postgrafting immunosuppression. Fourth, an important initial goal was establishing mixed chimerism, anticipating that it might protect from GVHD and it would provide an immunologic platform for subsequent DLI.51 Although approximately 80% of patients had mixed chimerism early after transplantation, it was usually unstable, progressing to either full donor chimerism or graft rejection and restricting DLI to 22 patients, including 8 who rejected their grafts. The differences between dogs and human patients with respect to establishing stable mixed chimerism may relate to differences in age and thymic function, previous chemotherapy and transfusions in patients, and minor interspecies variations in responses to the immunosuppressive agents. Finally, persisting antitumor responses occurred exclusively in patients with sustained engraftment, indicating the importance of donor T cells for inducing and maintaining these responses. Nineteen of 29 patients (66%) with measurable disease before transplantation achieved CRs, and 3 others achieved PRs. Among these, 8 molecular remissions in CML (n = 5) and CLL (n = 3) patients were documented 5 to 12 months after HCT, and 7 of these occurred without the need for DLI. The molecular remissions occurred while patients received immunosuppression for treatment of GVHD, indicating that powerful GVT responses were generated and continued even with control of other GVHD manifestations. Although low-dose TBI given with or without alkylating agents may induce remissions in some patients with untreated CLL and NHL,52,53 it has not been reported that low-dose TBI can induce CRs and molecular remissions in patients with chemotherapy-resistant CLL, and in particular after failure of previous fludarabine-containing regimens. Similarly, although low-dose TBI may have transient suppressive effects on CML, even high-dose myeloablative regimens (at least 1200 cGy TBI plus intensive chemotherapy) are by themselves often incapable of providing sustained disease control, as indicated by the frequent relapses observed after using T-cell-depleted allografts.54 Thus, it is very unlikely that the low-dose and low-dose-rate TBI was responsible for the major disease responses observed here. Further, the molecular remissions occurred gradually, with clearing of tumor over many months and long after conditioning therapies were given. These observations also suggest that for some indolent malignancies, cytoreductive therapy given before transplantation may not be necessary and that DLI in this setting may be used sparingly and even avoided if disease is stable or responding. Factors that may influence the extent and tempo of disease responses include degrees of minor non-HLA disparities between donors and recipients, effects of immunosuppressive therapy given for GVHD, and expression of target antigens by tumor cells. For aggressive malignancies, it may be necessary to control tumor growth before GVT effects occur. Whereas others have used systemic chemotherapy, we are exploring whether this can be achieved by adding tumor-directed monoclonal antibody conjugates.55,56 The induction of molecular remissions suggests that this treatment approach has curative potential for CML and CLL and may be a future alternative for younger patients who wish to avoid complications from high-dose regimens. Observations of durable molecular remissions of CML after DLI was given for relapse after conventional HCT support this notion.57,58 The current study included a heterogeneous group of patients, which allowed us to demonstrate antitumor effects in several different diseases and to identify patients at increased risk of graft rejection. Disease-specific phase 2 and 3 studies with prolonged follow-up will be required to fully evaluate the benefits and limitations of this approach regarding its curative potential, consequences of GVHD, late side effects, and comparisons with conventional allografting. In smaller series reported recently, reduced-intensity regimens were used for allografting.17-20 Conceptually, achieving engraftment relied on immunosuppressive (and myelosuppressive) chemotherapy of varying intensities given before transplantation to suppress tumors and host immunity. Sustained engraftment was usually achieved, and impressive GVT activity was observed in some patients. Investigators from Houston used conventional chemotherapy regimens incorporating the purine analogues fludarabine or 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine in patients with advanced malignancies who were ineligible for conventional allografts.17,19 Postgrafting GVHD prophylaxis was omitted in their initial patients but added later to control GVHD. Fludarabine, 30 mg/m2 ×3, and cyclophosphamide, 300 mg/m2 ×3, their least intensive regimen, resulted in failed donor engraftment in 3 of 5 heavily pretreated CLL patients,19 necessitating dose escalation. These results suggest that this regimen was less immunosuppressive than TBI/MMF/CSP reported here. Others have used modifications of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide.44,59 Slavin et al18 reported using an attenuated conventional transplantation regimen of busulfan, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin with CSP alone as GVHD prophylaxis. Among 26 patients, veno-occlusive disease occurred in 50% and fatal acute GVHD occurred in 15%. Although the 14-month survival of 77.5% was impressive, the median patient age was 32 years (range, 1-56 years), and all appeared to be candidates for conventional allografting. Using high-dose cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin with or without thymic irradiation, Sykes et al20 have established grafts from HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched donors in patients with advanced lymphoma. By focusing on postgrafting immunosuppression to control rejection and GVHD, we have further reduced the intensity and toxicity of conditioning therapy for recipients of HLA-identical grafts. This allografting approach appears broadly applicable and suitable for studies of adoptive immunotherapy in hematologic and solid tumors, given that the transplantations can be performed effectively in an outpatient setting with minimal toxicity and limited supportive-care requirements. The development of effective targeting strategies to focus T-cell reactions against tumor antigens or minor antigens with hematopoietic restriction60,61 might enhance future outcomes through more effective tumor killing and by reducing the risks of GVHD. As reviewed elsewhere,51 this new allografting concept also has potentially important applications in the treatment of some nonmalignant diseases.
We thank the medical, nursing, data processing, and clinical staffs at the listed institutions for their important contributions to this study through their careful and dedicated care of the patients. We thank Bonnie Larson for her assistance in preparation of this manuscript.
Submitted September 18, 2000; accepted January 31, 2001.
Supported in part by grants CA78902, CA49605, HL36444, CA18221, CA15704, and HL03701 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD. P.A.M. and D.G.M. were also supported by a grant from the Gabrielle Rich Leukemia Foundation. R.F.S. also received support from the Laura Landro Salomon Endowment Fund.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Peter A. McSweeney, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Campus Box B-190, Denver, CO 80262; e-mail: peter.mcsweeney{at}uchsc.edu.
1. Molina AJ, Storb RF. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in older adults. In: Rowe JM,Lazarus HM,Carella AM, eds. Handbook of Bone Marrow Transplantation. London United Kingdom: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2000:111-137. 2. Burchenal JH, Oettgen HF, Holmberg EAD, Hemphill SC, Reppert JA. Effect of total body irradiation on the transplantability of mouse leukemias. Cancer Res. 1960;20:425-430. 3. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, et al. Bone-marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:832-843[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]895-902. 4. Weiden PL, Flournoy N, Thomas ED, et al. Antileukemic effect of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of allogeneic-marrow grafts. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1068-1073[Abstract]. 5. Weiden PL, Sullivan KM, Flournoy N, Storb R, Thomas ED, and the Seattle Marrow Transplant Team. Antileukemic effect of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Contribution to improved survival after allogeneic marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:1529-1533[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Horowitz MM, Gale RP, Sondel PM, et al.
Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation.
Blood.
1990;75:555-562 7. Butturini A, Bortin MM, Gale RP. Graft-versus-leukemia following bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1987;2:233-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 8. Kersey JH, Weisdorf D, Nesbit ME, et al. Comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for treatment of high-risk refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:461-467[Abstract].
9.
Weisdorf DJ, Nesbit ME, Ramsay NKC, et al.
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: prolonged survival associated with acute graft-versus-host disease.
J Clin Oncol.
1987;5:1348-1355
10.
Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, Storb R, et al.
Influence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease on relapse and survival after bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings as treatment of acute and chronic leukemia.
Blood.
1989;73:1720-1728
11.
Kolb HJ, Mittermüller J, Clemm CH, et al.
Donor leukocyte transfusions for treatment of recurrent chronic myelogenous leukemia in marrow transplant patients.
Blood.
1990;76:2462-2465
12.
Porter DL, Roth MS, McGarigle C, Ferrara JLM, Antin JH.
Induction of graft-versus-host disease as immunotherapy for relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia.
N Engl J Med.
1994;330:100-106
13.
Kolb HJ, Schattenberg A, Goldman JM, et al.
Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Working Party Chronic Leukemia.
Blood.
1995;86:2041-2050
14.
Mackinnon S, Papadopoulos EB, Carabasi MH, et al.
Adoptive immunotherapy evaluating escalating doses of donor leukocytes for relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation: separation of graft-versus-leukemia responses from graft-versus-host disease.
Blood.
1995;86:1261-1268
15.
Giralt S, Hester J, Huh Y, et al.
CD8-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion as treatment for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Blood.
1995;86:4337-4343
16.
Collins RH Jr, Shpilberg O, Drobyski WR, et al.
Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;15:433-444
17.
Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, et al.
Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy.
Blood.
1997;89:4531-4536
18.
Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al.
Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases.
Blood.
1998;91:756-763 19. Khouri IF, Keating M, Körbling M, et al. Transplant-lite: induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2817-2824[Abstract]. 20. Sykes M, Preffer F, McAfee S, et al. Mixed lymphohaemopoietic chimerism and graft-versus-lymphoma effects after non-myeloablative therapy and HLA-mismatched bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet. 1999;353:1755-1759[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Storb R, Raff RF, Appelbaum FR, et al.
Comparison of fractionated to single-dose total body irradiation in conditioning canine littermates for DLA-identical marrow grafts.
Blood.
1989;74:1139-1143
22.
Storb R, Yu C, Wagner JL, et al.
Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in DLA-identical littermate dogs given sublethal total body irradiation before and pharmacological immunosuppression after marrow transplantation.
Blood.
1997;89:3048-3054 23. Storb R, Raff RF, Graham T, et al. Marrow toxicity of fractionated versus single dose total body irradiation is identical in a canine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:275-283[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. Mickelson E, Petersdorf EW. Histocompatibility. In: Thomas ED,Blume KG,Forman SJ, eds. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. 2nd ed. Boston: Blackwell Science; 1999:28-37.
25.
Xun CQ, McSweeney PA, Boeckh M, Storb RF, Broudy VC, Thompson JA.
Successful nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in an acute leukemia patient with chemotherapy-induced marrow aplasia and progressive pulmonary aspergillosis [letter].
Blood.
1999;94:3273-3276
26.
Meyers JD, Petersen FB, Counts GW, et al.
Bacterial, fungal and protozoan infection after marrow transplantation. In:
Baum SJ,Santos GW,Takaku F, eds.
Recent Advances and Future Directions in Bone Marrow Transplantation (Experimental Hematology Today 27. Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:1545-1552[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Boeckh M, Bowden RA, Goodrich JM, Pettinger M, Meyers JD.
Cytomegalovirus antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes after allogeneic marrow transplantation.
Blood.
1992;80:1358-1364 29. Bryant E, Martin PJ. Documentation of engraftment and characterization of chimerism following hematopoietic cell transplantation. In: Thomas ED,Blume KG,Forman SJ, eds. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. 2nd ed. Boston: Blackwell Science; 1999:197-206. 30. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825-828[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 31. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250-259[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 32. Radich J, Ladne P, Gooley T. Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia predicts relapse after allogeneic BMT. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1995;1:24-31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
33.
Radich JP, Gehly G, Gooley T, et al.
Polymerase chain reaction detection of the BCR-ABL fusion transcript after allogeneic marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: results and implications in 346 patients.
Blood.
1995;85:2632-2638 34. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695-706[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
35.
Martin PJ, Schoch G, Fisher L, et al.
A retrospective analysis of therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease: initial treatment.
Blood.
1990;76:1464-1472
36.
Storb R, Pepe M, Anasetti C, et al.
What role for prednisone in prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing marrow transplants?
Blood.
1990;76:1037-1045
37.
Storb R, Etzioni R, Anasetti C, et al.
Cyclophosphamide combined with antithymocyte globulin in preparation for allogeneic marrow transplants in patients with aplastic anemia.
Blood.
1994;84:941-949
38.
Boeckh M, Gooley TA, Myerson D, Cunningham T, Schoch G, Bowden RA.
Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study.
Blood.
1996;88:4063-4071 39. Cardis E, Gilbert ES, Carpenter L, et al. Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res. 1995;142:117-132[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
40.
Curtis RE, Rowlings PA, Deeg HJ, et al.
Solid cancers after bone marrow transplantation.
N Engl J Med.
1997;336:897-904 41. Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987 [review]. Radiat Res. 1994;137(suppl 2):S17-S67[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
42.
Travis LB, Weeks J, Curtis RE, et al.
Leukemia following low-dose total body irradiation and chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
J Clin Oncol.
1996;14:565-571
43.
Storb R, Yu C, Zaucha JM, et al.
Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in dogs given donor antigen, CTLA4Ig, and 100 cGy total body irradiation before and pharmacologic immunosuppression after marrow transplant.
Blood.
1999;94:2523-2529
44.
Childs R, Clave E, Contentin N, et al.
Engraftment kinetics after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: full donor T-cell chimerism precedes alloimmune responses.
Blood.
1999;94:3234-3241 45. Niederwieser D, Wolff D, Hegenbart U, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) from HLA-matched and one-allele mismatched unrelated donors using a nonmyeloablative regimen [abstract #2506]. Blood. 1999;94(suppl 1):561a.
46.
Gregoire V, Hunter N, Milas L, Brock WA, Plunkett W, Hittelman WN.
Potentiation of radiation-induced regrowth delay in murine tumors by fludarabine.
Cancer Res.
1994;54:468-474 47. Deeg HJ, Shulman HM, Schmidt E, Yee GC, Thomas ED, Storb R. Marrow graft rejection and veno-occlusive disease of the liver in patients with aplastic anemia conditioned with cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine. Transplantation. 1986;42:497-501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
48.
Nash RA, Pepe MS, Storb R, et al.
Acute graft-versus-host disease: analysis of risk factors after allogeneic marrow transplantation and prophylaxis with cyclosporine and methotrexate.
Blood.
1992;80:1838-1845
49.
Ratanatharathorn V, Nash RA, Przepiorka D, et al.
Phase III study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus (Prograf, FK506) with methotrexate and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation.
Blood.
1998;92:2303-2314
50.
Yu C, Seidel K, Nash RA, et al.
Synergism between mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine in preventing graft-versus-host disease among lethally irradiated dogs given DLA-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts.
Blood.
1998;91:2581-2587 51. McSweeney PA, Storb R. Mixed chimerism: preclinical studies and clinical applications [review]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1999;5:192-203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 52. Roncadin M, Arcicasa M, Zagonel V, et al. Total body irradiation and prednimustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a 9-year experience at a single institution. Cancer. 1994;74:978-984[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 53. Mendenhall NP, Noyes WD, Million RR. Total body irradiation for stage II-IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: ten-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:67-74[Abstract].
54.
Marmont AM, Horowitz MM, Gale RP, et al.
T-cell depletion of HLA-identical transplants in leukemia.
Blood.
1991;78:2120-2130
55.
Sievers EL, Appelbaum FR, Spielberger RT, et al.
Selective ablation of acute myeloid leukemia using antibody-targeted chemotherapy: a phase I study of an anti-CD33 calicheamicin immunoconjugate.
Blood.
1999;93:3678-3684
56.
Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, et al.
Phase I study of 131I-Anti-CD45 antibody plus cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation for advanced acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.
Blood.
1999;94:1237-1247 57. Porter DL, Collins RH Jr, Shpilberg O, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients who achieved complete remission after donor leukocyte infusions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1999;5:253-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 58. Cwynarski K, Dazzi F, Cross NCP, et al. Response to donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) of patients with CML in relapse after allografting: a long-term follow-up study using RT-PCR [abstract #2968]. Blood. 1999;94(suppl 1):669a.
59.
Carella AM, Lerma E, Dejana A, et al.
Engraftment of HLA-matched sibling hematopoietic stem cells after immunosuppressive conditioning regimen in patients with hematologic neoplasias.
Haematologica.
1998;83:904-909
60.
Warren EH, Greenberg PD, Riddell SR.
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-defined human minor histocompatibility antigens with a restricted tissue distribution.
Blood.
1998;91:2197-2207
61.
Mutis T, Verdijk R, Schrama E, Esendam B, Brand A, Goulmy E.
Feasibility of immunotherapy of relapsed leukemia with ex vivo-generated cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for hematopoietic system-restricted minor histocompatibility antigens.
Blood.
1999;93:2336-2341
Abbreviations for therapies listed in Table 1: ABVD indicates adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; Ara-C, cytosine arabinoside; Asp, asparaginase; CE ± D, high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide ± decadron; Ch, chlorambucil; CHAD, cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone; CHOP, vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone; CMOPP, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; Cp, cisplatin; CVP, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone; Cy, cyclophosphamide; CyTx, high-dose cyclophosphamide, Taxol; D, daunorubicin; Dex, dexamethasone; DHAP, dexamethasone, cytosine arabinoside, cisplatin; E, etoposide; F, fludarabine; FLAG, fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; FMD, fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone; Gc, gemcitabine; HAM, high-dose cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone; HDAC, high-dose cytosine arabinoside; HDCy, high-dose cyclophosphamide; HDT, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation; Hh, homoharringtonine; Hu, hydroxyurea; Ida, idarubicin; IFN, alpha-interferon; M, melphalan; MCE, mitoxantone, cytosine arabinoside, etoposide; Mi, mitoxantrone; MOPP, nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; P, prednisone; TAD, thioguanine, cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin; TG, 6-thioguanine; V, vincristine; VAD, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone; Vb, vinblastine; XRT, local radiation therapy.
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
J. T. Schiffer, K. Kirby, B. Sandmaier, R. Storb, L. Corey, and M. Boeckh Timing and severity of community acquired respiratory virus infections after myeloablative versus non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Haematologica, August 1, 2009; 94(8): 1101 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Kohrt, B. B. Turnbull, K. Heydari, J. A. Shizuru, G. G. Laport, D. B. Miklos, L. J. Johnston, S. Arai, W.-K. Weng, R. T. Hoppe, et al. TLI and ATG conditioning with low risk of graft-versus-host disease retains antitumor reactions after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors Blood, July 30, 2009; 114(5): 1099 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishida, M. Hudecek, A. Kostic, M. Bleakley, E. H. Warren, D. Maloney, R. Storb, and S. R. Riddell Development of Tumor-Reactive T Cells After Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 15(14): 4759 - 4768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mielcarek, B. E. Storer, M. Boeckh, P. A. Carpenter, G. B. McDonald, H. J. Deeg, R. A. Nash, M. E. D. Flowers, K. Doney, S. Lee, et al. Initial therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease with low-dose prednisone does not compromise patient outcomes Blood, March 26, 2009; 113(13): 2888 - 2894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Thomson, E. C. Morris, A. Bloor, G. Cook, D. Milligan, A. Parker, F. Clark, L. Yung, D. C. Linch, R. Chakraverty, et al. Favorable Long-Term Survival After Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Transplantation for Multiple-Relapse Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2009; 27(3): 426 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schetelig, M. Bornhauser, C. Schmid, B. Hertenstein, R. Schwerdtfeger, H. Martin, M. Stelljes, U. Hegenbart, K. Schafer-Eckart, M. Fussel, et al. Matched Unrelated or Matched Sibling Donors Result in Comparable Survival After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Cooperative German Transplant Study Group J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2008; 26(32): 5183 - 5191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. L. Weissman and J. A. Shizuru The origins of the identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells, and their capability to induce donor-specific transplantation tolerance and treat autoimmune diseases Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3543 - 3553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Scott, D. A. Wells, M. R. Loken, D. Myerson, W. M. Leisenring, and H. J. Deeg Validation of a flow cytometric scoring system as a prognostic indicator for posttransplantation outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2681 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Marks, K. Potthoff, J. Hahn, G. Ihorst, H. Bertz, A. Spyridonidis, E. Holler, and J. M. Finke Reduced-toxicity conditioning with fludarabine, BCNU, and melphalan in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: particular activity against advanced hematologic malignancies Blood, July 15, 2008; 112(2): 415 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Anderlini and R. E. Champlin Biologic and molecular effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy individuals: recent findings and current challenges Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 1767 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Conrad, M. Remberger, K. Cederlund, O. Ringden, and L. Barkholt A comparison between low intensity and reduced intensity conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for solid tumors Haematologica, February 1, 2008; 93(2): 265 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Castermans, F. Baron, E. Willems, N. Schaaf-Lafontaine, N. Meuris, A. Gothot, J.-F. Vanbellighen, C. Herens, L. Seidel, V. Geenen, et al. Evidence for neo-generation of T cells by the thymus after non-myeloablative conditioning Haematologica, February 1, 2008; 93(2): 240 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sorror, B. E. Storer, D. G. Maloney, B. M. Sandmaier, P. J. Martin, and R. Storb Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative or myeloablative conditioning regimens for treatment of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia Blood, January 1, 2008; 111(1): 446 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Olavarria, S. Siddique, M. J. Griffiths, S. Avery, J. L. Byrne, K. P. Piper, A. L. Lennard, L. Pallan, J. M. Arrazi, J. B. Perz, et al. Posttransplantation imatinib as a strategy to postpone the requirement for immunotherapy in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allografts for chronic myeloid leukemia Blood, December 15, 2007; 110(13): 4614 - 4617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kebriaei, M. A. Detry, S. Giralt, A. Carrasco-Yalan, A. Anagnostopoulos, D. Couriel, I. F. Khouri, P. Anderlini, C. Hosing, A. Alousi, et al. Long-term follow-up of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia Blood, November 1, 2007; 110(9): 3456 - 3462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kahl, B. E. Storer, B. M. Sandmaier, M. Mielcarek, M. B. Maris, K. G. Blume, D. Niederwieser, T. R. Chauncey, S. J. Forman, E. Agura, et al. Relapse risk in patients with malignant diseases given allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2744 - 2748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. King and J. M. Rowe Recent Developments in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Therapy Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(suppl_2): 14 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sorror, B. M. Sandmaier, B. E. Storer, M. B. Maris, F. Baron, D. G. Maloney, B. L. Scott, H. J. Deeg, F. R. Appelbaum, and R. Storb Comorbidity and Disease Status Based Risk Stratification of Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasia Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4246 - 4254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Devetten and J. Armitage Hematopoietic cell transplantation: progress and obstacles Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1450 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E.C. Broers, M. Bruinsma, S. J. Posthumus-van Sluijs, E.-J. Wils, H. Spits, B. Lowenberg, E. Braakman, and J. J. Cornelissen IL-7 mediated protection against minor antigen-mismatched allograft rejection is associated with enhanced recovery of regulatory T cells Haematologica, August 1, 2007; 92(8): 1099 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Graves, W. Hogan, C. S. Kuhr, R. Diaconescu, M. A. Harkey, G. E. Georges, G. E. Sale, E. Zellmer, S. W. Baran, C. Jochum, et al. Stable trichimerism after marrow grafting from 2 DLA-identical canine donors and nonmyeloablative conditioning Blood, July 1, 2007; 110(1): 418 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Maloney Follicular NHL: From Antibodies and Vaccines to Graft-versus-Lymphoma Effects Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aschan Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current status and future outlook Br. Med. Bull., October 5, 2006; (2006) ldl005v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Baron, R. Storb, B. E. Storer, M. B. Maris, D. Niederwieser, J. A. Shizuru, T. R. Chauncey, B. Bruno, S. J. Forman, P. A. McSweeney, et al. Factors Associated With Outcomes in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Nonmyeloablative Conditioning After Failed Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4150 - 4157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Deeg, M. O'Donnell, J. Tolar, R. Agarwal, R. E. Harris, S. A. Feig, M. C. Territo, R. H. Collins, P. A. McSweeney, E. A. Copelan, et al. Optimization of conditioning for marrow transplantation from unrelated donors for patients with aplastic anemia after failure of immunosuppressive therapy Blood, September 1, 2006; 108(5): 1485 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.-C. Gorin, M. Labopin, J.-M. Boiron, N. Theorin, T. Littlewood, S. Slavin, H. Greinix, J. Y. Cahn, E. P. Alessandrino, A. Rambaldi, et al. Results of Genoidentical Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Reduced Intensity Conditioning for Acute Myelocytic Leukemia: Higher Doses of Stem Cells Infused Benefit Patients Receiving Transplants in Second Remission or Beyond--The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2006; 24(24): 3959 - 3966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schmid, M. Schleuning, R. Schwerdtfeger, B. Hertenstein, E. Mischak-Weissinger, D. Bunjes, S. v. Harsdorf, C. Scheid, U. Holtick, H. Greinix, et al. Long-term survival in refractory acute myeloid leukemia after sequential treatment with chemotherapy and reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation Blood, August 1, 2006; 108(3): 1092 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Barkholt, M. Bregni, M. Remberger, D. Blaise, J. Peccatori, G. Massenkeil, P. Pedrazzoli, A. Zambelli, J.-O. Bay, S. Francois, et al. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic renal carcinoma in Europe Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1134 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Carnevale-Schianca, A. Cignetti, A. Capaldi, K. Vitaggio, A. Vallario, A. Ricchiardi, E. Sperti, R. Ferraris, M. Gatti, G. Grignani, et al. Allogeneic nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation in metastatic colon cancer: tumor-specific T cells directed to a tumor-associated antigen are generated in vivo during GVHD Blood, May 1, 2006; 107(9): 3795 - 3803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Copelan Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med., April 27, 2006; 354(17): 1813 - 1826. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ohashi, A. Kobayashi, H. Hara, Y. Miura, K. Yoshida, M. Kushida, Y. Ikarashi, M. Mandai, M. Kitajima, T. Yoshida, et al. Allogeneic MHC gene transfer enhances antitumor activity of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without exacerbating graft-versus-host disease. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2208 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Jabbour, E. Estey, and H. M. Kantarjian Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 247 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Hegenbart, D. Niederwieser, B. M. Sandmaier, M. B. Maris, J. A. Shizuru, H. Greinix, C. Cordonnier, B. Rio, A. Gratwohl, T. Lange, et al. Treatment for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia by Low-Dose, Total-Body, Irradiation-Based Conditioning and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation From Related and Unrelated Donors J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2006; 24(3): 444 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Scott and B. M. Sandmaier Outcomes with Myeloid Malignancies Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 381 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Locatelli Reduced-Intensity Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hemoglobinopathies Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 398 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Abbott Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment Oncologist, January 1, 2006; 11(1): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Zimring, G. A. Hair, S. S. Deshpande, and J. T. Horan Immunization to minor histocompatibility antigens on transfused RBCs through crosspriming into recipient MHC class I pathways Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 187 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Giaccone, J. S. McCune, M. B. Maris, T. A. Gooley, B. M. Sandmaier, J. T. Slattery, S. Cole, R. A. Nash, R. F. Storb, and G. E. Georges Pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil after nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4381 - 4388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Wu, L. Krishnamurti, J. L. Kutok, M. Biernacki, S. Rogers, W. Zhang, J. H. Antin, and J. Ritz Evidence for ineffective erythropoiesis in severe sickle cell disease Blood, November 15, 2005; 106(10): 3639 - 3645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Caballero, J. A. Garcia-Marco, R. Martino, V. Mateos, J. M. Ribera, J. Sarra, A. Leon, G. Sanz, J. de la Serna, R. Cabrera, et al. Allogeneic Transplant with Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens may Overcome the Poor Prognosis of B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Unmutated Immunoglobulin Variable Heavy-Chain Gene and Chromosomal Abnormalities (11q- and 17p-) Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7757 - 7763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Crawley, R. Szydlo, M. Lalancette, A. Bacigalupo, A. Lange, M. Brune, G. Juliusson, A. Nagler, A. Gratwohl, J. Passweg, et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 2969 - 2976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stelljes, M. Bornhauser, M. Kroger, J. Beyer, M. C. Sauerland, A. Heinecke, B. Berning, C. Scheffold, G. Silling, T. Buchner, et al. Conditioning with 8-Gy total body irradiation and fludarabine for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3314 - 3321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sorror, M. B. Maris, R. Storb, F. Baron, B. M. Sandmaier, D. G. Maloney, and B. Storer Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2912 - 2919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lowsky, T. Takahashi, Y. P. Liu, S. Dejbakhsh-Jones, F. C. Grumet, J. A. Shizuru, G. G. Laport, K. E. Stockerl-Goldstein, L. J. Johnston, R. T. Hoppe, et al. Protective conditioning for acute graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med., September 29, 2005; 353(13): 1321 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Corradini, F. Zallio, J. Mariotti, L. Farina, M. Bregni, P. Valagussa, F. Ciceri, A. Bacigalupo, A. Dodero, M. Lucesole, et al. Effect of Age and Previous Autologous Transplantation on Nonrelapse Mortality and Survival in Patients Treated With Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Allografting for Advanced Hematologic Malignancies J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2005; 23(27): 6690 - 6698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schmid, M. Schleuning, G. Ledderose, J. Tischer, and H.-J. Kolb Sequential Regimen of Chemotherapy, Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation, and Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Transfusion in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5675 - 5687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Tallman, D. G. Gilliland, and J. M. Rowe Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1154 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sorror, M. B. Maris, B. M. Sandmaier, B. E. Storer, M. J. Stuart, U. Hegenbart, E. Agura, T. R. Chauncey, J. Leis, M. Pulsipher, et al. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation After Nonmyeloablative Conditioning for Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2005; 23(16): 3819 - 3829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Girgis, C. Hallemeier, W. Blum, R. Brown, H.-s. Lin, H. Khoury, L. T. Goodnough, R. Vij, S. Devine, M. Wehde, et al. Chimerism and clinical outcomes of 110 recipients of unrelated donor bone marrow transplants who underwent conditioning with low-dose, single-exposure total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3035 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Schrier and C. R. Parikh Comparison of renal injury in myeloablative autologous, myeloablative allogeneic and non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 678 - 683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Baron, M. B. Maris, B. M. Sandmaier, B. E. Storer, M. Sorror, R. Diaconescu, A. E. Woolfrey, T. R. Chauncey, M. E.D. Flowers, M. Mielcarek, et al. Graft-Versus-Tumor Effects After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Nonmyeloablative Conditioning J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 1993 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cao, J. A. Shizuru, R. M. Wong, K. Sheehan, G. G. Laport, K. E. Stockerl-Goldstein, L. J. Johnston, M. J. Stuart, F. C. Grumet, R. S. Negrin, et al. Engraftment and survival following reduced-intensity allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation is affected by CD8+ T-cell dose Blood, March 15, 2005; 105(6): 2300 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Alyea, H. T. Kim, V. Ho, C. Cutler, J. Gribben, D. J. DeAngelo, S. J. Lee, S. Windawi, J. Ritz, R. M. Stone, et al. Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1810 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Laukkanen, K. Kuramoto, B. Calmels, M. Takatoku, C. von Kalle, R. E. Donahue, and C. E. Dunbar Low-dose total body irradiation causes clonal fluctuation of primate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Blood, February 1, 2005; 105(3): 1010 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Singh and D. L. Paterson Aspergillus Infections in Transplant Recipients Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2005; 18(1): 44 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Giralt Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Hematologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned over the Last 10 Years? Hematology, January 1, 2005; 2005(1): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Morris, K. Thomson, C. Craddock, P. Mahendra, D. Milligan, G. Cook, G. M. Smith, A. Parker, S. Schey, R. Chopra, et al. Outcomes after alemtuzumab-containing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation regimen for relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 3865 - 3871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kami, A. Makimoto, Y. Heike, and Y. Takaue Reduced-intensity Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (RIST) for Solid Malignancies Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2004; 34(12): 707 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Tykodi, E. H. Warren, J. A. Thompson, S. R. Riddell, R. W. Childs, B. E. Otterud, M. F. Leppert, R. Storb, and B. M. Sandmaier Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma after Nonmyeloablative Conditioning: Toxicity, Clinical Response, and Immunological Response to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 10(23): 7799 - 7811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Maris, B. M. Sandmaier, B. E. Storer, T. Chauncey, M. J. Stuart, R. T. Maziarz, E. Agura, A. A. Langston, M. Pulsipher, R. Storb, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation for relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3535 - 3542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Freytes, F. R. Loberiza, J. D. Rizzo, A. Bashey, C. N. Bredeson, M. S. Cairo, R. P. Gale, M. M. Horowitz, T. R. Klumpp, R. Martino, et al. Myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients who experience relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma: a report of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3797 - 3803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Baron, J. E. Baker, R. Storb, T. A. Gooley, B. M. Sandmaier, M. B. Maris, D. G. Maloney, S. Heimfeld, D. Oparin, E. Zellmer, et al. Kinetics of engraftment in patients with hematologic malignancies given allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2254 - 2262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ritgen, S. Stilgenbauer, N. von Neuhoff, A. Humpe, M. Bruggemann, C. Pott, T. Raff, A. Krober, D. Bunjes, R. Schlenk, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia activity may overcome therapeutic resistance of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with unmutated immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene status: implications of minimal residual disease measurement with quantitative PCR Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2600 - 2602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rettig, J. K. Ritchey, J. L. Prior, J. S. Haug, D. Piwnica-Worms, and J. F. DiPersio Kinetics of In Vivo Elimination of Suicide Gene-Expressing T Cells Affects Engraftment, Graft-versus-Host Disease, and Graft-versus-Leukemia after Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 3620 - 3630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.C. MacQuillan and D. Mutimer Fulminant liver failure due to severe veno-occlusive disease after haematopoietic cell transplantation: a depressing experience QJM, September 1, 2004; 97(9): 581 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Abbott Do "minitransplantations" have "minitoxicity"? Blood, September 1, 2004; 104(5): 1239 - 1240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Diaconescu, C. R. Flowers, B. Storer, M. L. Sorror, M. B. Maris, D. G. Maloney, B. M. Sandmaier, and R. Storb Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors Blood, September 1, 2004; 104(5): 1550 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sorror, M. B. Maris, B. Storer, B. M. Sandmaier, R. Diaconescu, C. Flowers, D. G. Maloney, and R. Storb Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplantation comorbidities Blood, August 15, 2004; 104(4): 961 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Lima, A. Anagnostopoulos, M. Munsell, M. Shahjahan, N. Ueno, C. Ippoliti, B. S. Andersson, J. Gajewski, D. Couriel, J. Cortes, et al. Nonablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: dose is relevant for long-term disease control after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Blood, August 1, 2004; 104(3): 865 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Parikh, B. M. Sandmaier, R. F. Storb, K. G. Blume, F. Sahebi, D. G. Maloney, M. B. Maris, Y. Nieto, C. L. Edelstein, R. W. Schrier, et al. Acute Renal Failure after Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1868 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Corradini, A. Dodero, F. Zallio, D. Caracciolo, M. Casini, M. Bregni, F. Narni, F. Patriarca, M. Boccadoro, F. Benedetti, et al. Graft-Versus-Lymphoma Effect in Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas After Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Followed by Allogeneic Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2172 - 2176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kroger, G. Schilling, H. Einsele, P. Liebisch, A. Shimoni, A. Nagler, J. A. Perez-Simon, J. F. San Miguel, M. Kiehl, A. Fauser, et al. Deletion of chromosome band 13q14 as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization is a prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma who are receiving allogeneic dose-reduced stem cell transplantation Blood, June 1, 2004; 103(11): 4056 - 4061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gratwohl, H. Baldomero, T. Demirer, G. Rosti, G. Dini, R. Ladenstein, and A. Urbano-Ispizua Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation for solid tumors in Europe Ann. Onc., April 1, 2004; 15(4): 653 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Mapara and M. Sykes Tolerance and Cancer: Mechanisms of Tumor Evasion and Strategies for Breaking Tolerance J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2004; 22(6): 1136 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Shanafelt and T. G. Call Current Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2004; 79(3): 388 - 398. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Carvallo, N. Geller, R. Kurlander, R. Srinivasan, O. Mena, T. Igarashi, L. M. Griffith, W. M. Linehan, and R. W. Childs Prior chemotherapy and allograft CD34+ dose impact donor engraftment following nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with solid tumors Blood, February 15, 2004; 103(4): 1560 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Kolb, C. Schmid, A. J. Barrett, and D. J. Schendel Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras Blood, February 1, 2004; 103(3): 767 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Bethge, U. Hegenbart, M. J. Stuart, B. E. Storer, M. B. Maris, M. E. D. Flowers, D. G. Maloney, T. Chauncey, B. Bruno, E. Agura, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning Blood, February 1, 2004; 103(3): 790 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Guardiola, G. Socie, X. Li, P. Ribaud, A. Devergie, H. Esperou, P. Richard, R. Traineau, A. Janin, and E. Gluckman Acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with Fanconi anemia or acquired aplastic anemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors: risk factors and influence on outcome Blood, January 1, 2004; 103(1): 73 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Hogan, M. Maris, B. Storer, B. M. Sandmaier, D. G. Maloney, H. G. Schoch, A. E. Woolfrey, H. M. Shulman, R. Storb, and G. B. McDonald Hepatic injury after nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a study of 193 patients Blood, January 1, 2004; 103(1): 78 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. B. Randolph, T. A. Gooley, E. H. Warren, F. R. Appelbaum, and S. R. Riddell Female donors contribute to a selective graft-versus-leukemia effect in male recipients of HLA-matched, related hematopoietic stem cell transplants Blood, January 1, 2004; 103(1): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. van Besien, F. R. Loberiza Jr, R. Bajorunaite, J. O. Armitage, A. Bashey, L. J. Burns, C. O. Freytes, J. Gibson, M. M. Horowitz, D. J. Inwards, et al. Comparison of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma Blood, November 15, 2003; 102(10): 3521 - 3529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Maloney, A. J. Molina, F. Sahebi, K. E. Stockerl-Goldstein, B. M. Sandmaier, W. Bensinger, B. Storer, U. Hegenbart, G. Somlo, T. Chauncey, et al. Allografting with nonmyeloablative conditioning following cytoreductive autografts for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3447 - 3454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukuda, R. C. Hackman, K. A. Guthrie, B. M. Sandmaier, M. Boeckh, M. B. Maris, D. G. Maloney, H. J. Deeg, P. J. Martin, R. F. Storb, et al. Risks and outcomes of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome after nonmyeloablative and conventional conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Blood, October 15, 2003; 102(8): 2777 - 2785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wong, S. A. Giralt, T. Martin, D. R. Couriel, A. Anagnostopoulos, C. Hosing, B. S. Andersson, P. Cano, M. Shahjahan, C. Ippoliti, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning for unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as treatment for myeloid malignancies in patients older than 55 years Blood, October 15, 2003; 102(8): 3052 - 3059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bachar-Lustig, S. Reich-Zeliger, and Y. Reisner Anti-third-party veto CTLs overcome rejection of hematopoietic allografts: synergism with rapamycin and BM cell dose Blood, September 15, 2003; 102(6): 1943 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Maris, D. Niederwieser, B. M. Sandmaier, B. Storer, M. Stuart, D. Maloney, E. Petersdorf, P. McSweeney, M. Pulsipher, A. Woolfrey, et al. HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies Blood, September 15, 2003; 102(6): 2021 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. N. Deininger and B. J. Druker Specific Targeted Therapy of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia with Imatinib Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2003; 55(3): 401 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Barker, D. J. Weisdorf, T. E. DeFor, B. R. Blazar, J. S. Miller, and J. E. Wagner Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning Blood, September 1, 2003; 102(5): 1915 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Corradini, M. Cavo, H. Lokhorst, G. Martinelli, C. Terragna, I. Majolino, P. Valagussa, M. Boccadoro, D. Samson, A. Bacigalupo, et al. Molecular remission after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation predicts a better relapse-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma Blood, September 1, 2003; 102(5): 1927 - 1929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.C. Taussig, A.J. Davies, J.D. Cavenagh, H. Oakervee, D. Syndercombe-Court, S. Kelsey, J.A.L. Amess, A.Z.S. Rohatiner, T.A. Lister, and M.J. Barnett Durable Remissions of Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Reduced-Intensity Allografting J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2003; 21(16): 3060 - 3065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Renga, P. Pedrazzoli, and S. Siena Present results and perspectives of allogeneic non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of human solid tumors Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1177 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bornhauser, B. Storer, J. T. Slattery, F. R. Appelbaum, H. J. Deeg, J. Hansen, P. J. Martin, G. B. McDonald, W. G. Nichols, J. Radich, et al. Conditioning with fludarabine and targeted busulfan for transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 820 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukuda, M. Boeckh, R. A. Carter, B. M. Sandmaier, M. B. Maris, D. G. Maloney, P. J. Martin, R. F. Storb, and K. A. Marr Risks and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants after nonmyeloablative conditioning Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Perez-Simon, M. Diez-Campelo, R. Martino, A. Sureda, D. Caballero, C. Canizo, S. Brunet, A. Altes, L. Vazquez, J. Sierra, et al. Impact of CD34+ cell dose on the outcome of patients undergoing reduced-intensity-conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 1108 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mohty, J.-O. Bay, C. Faucher, B. Choufi, K. Bilger, O. Tournilhac, N. Vey, A.-M. Stoppa, D. Coso, C. Chabannon, et al. Graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical sibling with antithymocyte globulin-based reduced-intensity preparative regimen Blood, July 15, 2003; 102(2): 470 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||