|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, 15 June 2001, Vol. 97, No. 12, pp. 3925-3930
NEOPLASIA
Detection of leukemic cells in the
CD34+CD38 bone marrow progenitor population
in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Aswathi A. George,
Janet Franklin,
Keith Kerkof,
Ami J. Shah,
Mary Price,
Eleanor Tsark,
David Bockstoce,
Dapeng Yao,
Nancy Hart,
Sherri Carcich,
Robertson Parkman,
Gay M. Crooks, and
Kenneth Weinberg
From the Divisions of Research Immunology/Bone Marrow
Transplantation and Hematology-Oncology, Childrens Hospital, Los
Angeles, CA.
 |
Abstract |
Successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation
in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) requires the ability to
either selectively kill the leukemia cells or separate normal from
leukemic HSC. Based on previous studies showing that more than 95% of
childhood B-lineage ALL express CD38, this study evaluated whether
normal CD34+CD38 progenitors from children
with B-lineage ALL could be isolated by flow cytometry.
CD34+ cells from bone marrow samples from 10 children with
B-lineage ALL were isolated at day 28 of treatment, when clinical
remission had been attained. The CD34+ progenitor cells
were flow cytometrically sorted into CD34+CD38+
and CD34+CD38 populations. The absolute
numbers of CD34+CD38 cells that could
be isolated ranged from 401 to 6245. The cells were then analyzed for
the presence of clonotypic rearrangements of the T-cell receptor (TCR)
V 2-D 3 locus. Only patients whose diagnostic marrow had an
informative TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement were included in this
study. Detection thresholds were typically 10 4 to
10 5 leukemic cells in normal marrow. In 6 of 10 samples analyzed, the sorted CD34+CD38 cells
had no detectable V 2-D 3 rearrangements. In 4 cases, the clonotypic leukemic V 2-D 3 rearrangement was detected in the CD34+CD38 population, indicating that
the putative normal HSC population also contained leukemic cells. The
data indicate that although most childhood ALL cells express CD34 and
CD38, leukemic cells are also frequently present in the
CD34+CD38 population. Therefore, strategies
to isolate and transplant normal HSC from children with ALL
will require a more stringent definition of the normal HSC than
the CD34+CD38 phenotype.
(Blood. 2001;97:3925-3930)
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
Introduction |
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents the
clonal proliferation of malignantly transformed lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow and is the most common malignancy in the pediatric population. Close to 80% of ALL cases are a result of clonal expansion of B-cell precursors and contain rearrangements in the heavy-chain immunoglobulin (IgH) gene.2 In addition,
cross-lineage T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements
frequently occur in B-cell precursor ALL: rearranged TCR , TCR ,
and TCR are found in 35%, 55%, and 90% of cases,
respectively.1 Thus polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
analysis of immunoreceptor gene rearrangements can be used for
clonality studies in lymphoid leukemias.1 Complete TCR gene rearrangements can be analyzed easily with the
PCR technique because the TCR genes contain a limited
number of V and J gene segments; hence, only a limited number of
oligonucleotide primers is needed.
The optimal treatment for recurrent ALL is allogeneic bone marrow
transplant (BMT). Unfortunately, only 30% of patients who require a
transplant will have an HLA-identical sibling donor.3 Other potential marrow donors include HLA-phenotypically identical unrelated donors. However, there is a higher risk of serious or fatal
graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor BMT.
Autologous BMT is an alternative solution to the problems associated
with unrelated BMT, because all patients would have a donor. However,
difficulty in obtaining leukemia-free stem cells from patients with ALL
has hindered the ability to perform autologous BMT. The major problem
after autologous BMT is relapse of the disease. Autologous marrow may
contain leukemic cells that are responsible for the
relapse.4 To overcome this problem, autologous BMT could
be performed either after depletion of leukemic cells or after positive
selection of normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Methods to deplete
autologous marrow of leukemic cells have generally included in vitro
chemotherapy, immunologic depletion, or the use of immunotoxins, but
these may be either toxic to normal HSCs or fail to completely remove
leukemic cells.5-7
Therefore, we tested the feasibility of positive selection of
normal HSCs based on immunophenotype. Our previous studies showed that
more than 95% of childhood B-lineage ALL express CD38.8 Terstappen and colleagues identified a subpopulation of progenitor cells with the CD34+CD38 immunophenotype,
which may define the most primitive progenitors.9 Hao and
coworkers have identified a similar subpopulation in umbilical cord
blood.10 This rare, quiescent subpopulation has the
ability to produce colony-forming units from extended long-term
cultures. The CD34+CD38 cells lack expression
of most lineage-specific antigens.
This study was designed to test whether normal
CD34+CD38 progenitor cells, free of leukemia,
could be isolated by flow cytometry from children with B-lineage ALL.
Only patients with B-cell precursor ALL whose diagnostic marrow had an
informative TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement were included in this study.
CD34+ cells were isolated at day 28 of treatment, when
clinical remission had been attained. These cells were then flow
cytometrically sorted into CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 populations and then analyzed for
the presence of clonotypic rearrangements of the TCR V 2-D 3 locus.
The TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangements were detected by PCR amplification
and Southern hybridization to an oligonucleotide probe derived from the
sequence of the TCR V 2-D 3 N-region in the patients' diagnostic
marrow sample.
 |
Patients, materials, and methods |
Patients
Bone marrow samples were obtained for the study from children
diagnosed with ALL at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA). B-lineage
ALL was classified on the basis of FAB morphology. The patients
included in the study were FAB L1 or L2 and had expression of B-lineage
markers on their leukemia blasts, namely, HLA-DR, CD19+/ ,
and CD10. Most patients had CD34 expression on their leukemic blasts.
The diagnostic leukemia samples were CD38+. The sample
obtained prior to beginning therapy was designated the diagnostic
marrow. A second bone marrow sample was obtained from patients who were
informative for a TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement, when clinical
remission had been attained, usually on day 28 of treatment. The
studies were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the
CHLA Committee on Clinical Investigations (institutional review board)
and with the informed consent of the patients and parents.
Analysis of clonal rearrangements
DNA extraction.
Mononuclear cells were obtained from the diagnostic marrow by gradient
centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway,
NJ), if adequate marrow was available. The cells were then
lysed in a buffer containing 1 M Tris, 0.5 M EDTA, and 10% sodium
dodecyl sulfate, and incubated at 37°C overnight in the presence of
0.5 mg/mL proteinase K (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). If
availability of diagnostic marrow was limited to less than 200 µL,
the erythrocytes were lysed by resuspending the cells in 1 mL Orthomune
lysis buffer (Ortho, Raritan, NJ) for 5 minutes at room
temperature. After centrifugation, the erythrocyte lysis step was
repeated. DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction, followed by
ethanol precipitation.
PCR.
The PCR analysis was performed on DNA from diagnostic bone marrow
allowing the detection of TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangements. Reaction mixtures contained 500 ng DNA, 20 pmoles of each 5' and 3' primer (primers 9 and 1011; Table
1), 200 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 × GeneAmp buffer (10 mM
Tris, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl) (PerkinElmer, Branchburg, NJ) in a
50-µL volume. The reaction mixture was subjected to denaturation at
95°C for 5 minutes, followed by annealing at 52°C, for 2 minutes 43 seconds. Primer extension was started by the addition of 1.5 U Amplitaq Polymerase (PerkinElmer) and allowed to continue for 5 minutes at
72°C. Subsequent denaturation, annealing, and extension steps were
carried out at 92°C for 50 seconds, 52°C for 1 minute 40 seconds,
and 72°C for 1 minute 50 seconds for 35 cycles. Amplification products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels and discrete bands (~100
bp) corresponding to clonal rearrangements were excised from
the gel.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
N-regions and flanking germline sequences in B-cell
precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients showing T-cell receptor
V 2-D 3 rearrangements. The sequence used to generate
patient-specific clonogenic probes is shown in bold and underlined
|
|
Generation of clonospecific probes.
Gel slices were minced and DNA eluted in TE using a Spin-X column
(Corning, Corning, NY). DNA was precipitated in ethanol and dissolved
in 3 µL water. Purified amplification products were cloned into pGEM
plasmids (Promega, Madison, WI) and used to transform DH5 competent
cells. Minipreps of plasmid DNA from 6 to 12 individual clones were PCR
amplified using the plasmid promoter sequences T7 and SP6, and
sequenced. Oligonucleotide probes corresponding to the N-region of each
patient's TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangements were synthesized, if there
was consensus among the 6 or 12 clones. The probes included flanking
germline sequences, minus exonuclease trimmed sequences as appropriate.
Clonogenic probes were generated in this manner for each patient in
whom a TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement was found.
Evaluation probe specificity.
Genomic DNA (500 ng) from the patients' diagnostic marrow and DNA from
peripheral blood of healthy normal controls was amplified in a 50-µL
reaction containing 20 pmoles of each of the 5' and 3' primers (primers
8 and 11,11 Table 1), 200 µL of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 × GeneAmp buffer (10 mM
Tris, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl). The PCR reaction mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at 95°C and for 2 minutes 37 seconds at 58°C. Primer
extension was started by the addition of 1.5 U Amplitaq polymerase and
allowed to continue for 5 minutes at 72°C. After this initial cycle,
denaturing, annealing, and extension steps were carried out at 92°C
for 50 seconds, 58°C for 1 minute 34 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute
44 seconds for 35 cycles. The amplification product, which ranged from
350 to 380 bp, was electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels and transferred onto a charged nylon membrane (MSI, Westborough,
MA). Southern hybridization was carried out using clonospecific
probes end-labeled with 32P using T4 polynucleotide kinase,
to be sure that the probe only hybridized to the leukemic cell DNA of
the patient from whom it was derived. Probes that showed
cross-hybridization to DNA from normal controls were not included in
the study.
Processing of remission marrow
Fluorescent antibody labeling and cell sorting.
Mononuclear cells were isolated from the remission marrow by gradient
centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque and washed with Hanks balanced
saline solution (HBSS). After erythrocytes were lysed with Orthomune
lysis buffer, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) and 200 000 cells were set apart to be used as a positive
control for PCR amplification of the V 2-D 3 rearrangement. MAC MS+ separation columns (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn,
CA) were used for positive selection of CD34+
cells. CD34+ cells were resuspended in PBS at
106 cells/100 µL for incubation with fluorescently
labeled antibodies. Cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 4°C, with
20 µL of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD34
(Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) and 20 µL of phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD38 (Becton Dickinson
Immunocytometry Systems). CD34 cells used for isotype
controls were incubated for 20 minutes in 50 µL FITC-murine IgG
(diluted 1:100; Coulter, Hialeah, FL) and 50 µL PE-murine IgG
(diluted 1:50, Coulter). Following incubation, cells were washed with
PBS and sorted into CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 subpopulations on a FACSVantage
(Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems).
CD34+CD38 cells were defined as those that
were CD34bright and having CD38 PE fluorescence less than
one half of the maximum PE fluorescence of the isotype control.
DNA was extracted from each of the sorted cell fractions. Cells were
spun down and lysed overnight in 200 µL of the proteinase K-containing buffer at 37°C, followed by phenol-chloroform
extraction. DNA was ethanol precipitated using 0.1 M ammonium acetate
and 120 µg glycogen (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN)
as a carrier and resuspended in 10 µL water.
Detection of TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangements by PCR and Southern
hybridization.
All of the 10 µL DNA obtained from the sorted cell populations was
amplified by PCR in a 50-µL reaction as described earlier, using
primers 8 and 1111 (Table 1). DNA (500 ng) from the
diagnostic marrow and DNA from the unsorted remission marrow were
included as positive controls. In addition, to determine the limit of
sensitivity of detection of leukemic cell populations, genomic DNA from
diagnostic marrow was diluted into DNA from peripheral blood of normal
controls at 10 1 to 10 7 and amplified in the
same manner. PCR amplification products were electrophoresed on 1.5%
agarose gels and transferred onto charged nylon membranes.
Clonospecific probes were end labeled and hybridization carried out as
described earlier.
 |
Results |
Identification of V 2-D 3 rearrangements in the diagnostic bone
marrow of patients with childhood ALL
Ten patients whose diagnostic marrow had an informative TCR
V 2-D 3 rearrangement were included in this study. The V 2-D 3 sequences of the patients are given in Table 1. Rearrangement of the
TCR locus sometimes results in the trimming of the germline sequences flanking the inserted N regions, with a resulting increase in
diversity. The region used to generate patient-specific clonogenic probes (ranging from 17-35 bp) is given in bold and underlined in
each case.
Variability in the detection of clonotypic V 2-D 3
rearrangements in the CD34+CD38 population
from the remission marrow of patients with childhood ALL
The remission marrow was enriched for CD34+ cells,
then stained with anti-CD34 FITC and anti-CD38 PE and flow
cytometrically sorted into CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 populations. To minimize the
likelihood of contamination of the CD34+CD38
population with CD34+CD38+ cells during the
sort, a very rigid criterion was used to define CD34+CD38 cells as only those that were
CD34bright, and having CD38 PE fluorescence less than one
half of the maximum PE fluorescence of the isotype control. The numbers
of CD34+CD38+ cells isolated ranged from
20 006 to 472 271 cells and that of the
CD34+CD38 cells ranged from 401 to 6245 cells
(Table 2). Samples in which the number of
CD34+CD38 cells fell below 250 cells were
excluded from the study. Both populations were analyzed for the
presence of clonotypic rearrangements of the TCR V 2-D 3 locus
by PCR.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
Yield of CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 cells by FACS and detection of
clonotypic T-cell receptor V 2-D 3 rearrangements in remission
marrow
|
|
Six of the 10 patients in this study had no detectable clonotypic
rearrangement in the CD34+CD38 population.
Patient 7 (Figure 1) is representative of
the 6 such patients. The V 2-D 3 rearrangement typical of this
patient is easily detectable in the diagnostic bone marrow. When large
numbers of CD34+CD38+ cells (approximately
250 000) from remission bone marrow were studied, the clonotypic
rearrangement was detectable. However, no rearrangement was detected
either in the CD34+CD38 cells or in
equivalent numbers of CD34+CD38+ cells.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
Immunophenotype of diagnostic bone marrow and flow cytometric analysis
of and detection of TCR rearrangement in the progenitor population of
the remission marrow in patient 7.
(A) Expression of CD34, CD38, and CD19 in the diagnostic bone marrow.
(B) The day 28 remission marrow was enriched for CD34+
cells and analyzed for expression of CD34 and CD38. Quadrants
containing cells expressing CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 were designated as the
sorting regions R2 and R3, respectively. (C) Cells fractionated into
CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 underwent PCR amplification and
Southern hybridization, along with other controls as appropriate, for
detection of the clonotypic V 2-D 3 rearrangement originally
identified in this patient. The B-actin gene was used as a
control for the presence of DNA in the fractions tested. MNC indicates
mononuclear cells.
|
|
Four of the 10 patients in the study had detectable clonotypic
rearrangements in the CD34+CD38
population
Figure 2 (patient 8) shows an
example of a patient whose bone marrow was positive for the presence of
the clonotypic rearrangement in the CD34+CD38
population. Note the strong signals indicating the presence of several
copies of the rearrangement in the diagnostic marrow and the
CD34+CD38+ cells (472 271 cells). The signal
was several-fold lower in the CD34+CD38 lane
(401 cells), but this was well within the limits of sensitivity, as
indicated by the presence of signals of similar intensity in the lanes
representing similar numbers of CD34+CD38+
cells. It appears, therefore, that the number of
CD34+CD38 cells with a clonotypic
rearrangement is a small percentage of the total
CD34+CD38 population. The low frequency
of cells positive for the clonotypic rearrangement was also borne out
by the fact that there is a detectable signal in only 2 of the 5 lanes
of 401 CD34+CD38+ cells. Patient 1 showed a
similar pattern of low frequency of cells positive for the clonotypic
rearrangement in the CD34+CD38
population.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
Immunophenotype of diagnostic bone marrow and flow cytometric analysis
of and detection of TCR rearrangement in the progenitor population of
the remission marrow in patient 8.
Panels A, B, and C are as designated in Figure 1.
|
|
Bone marrow from patients 9 and 4 were also positive for the presence
of the clonotypic rearrangement in the
CD34+CD38 population. In these cases,
however, the percentage of leukemic cells was greater in the
CD34+CD38 population than in the
CD34+CD38+ population. Figure
3 shows the analysis of patient 9. Note
that there was no detectable signal representing V 2-D 3
rearrangements in the lanes representing
CD34+CD38+ cells equivalent in number to the
CD34+CD38 cells (5070 cells), although
B-actin signals could be visualized.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
Immunophenotype of diagnostic bone marrow and flow cytometric analysis
of and detection of TCR rearrangement in the progenitor population of
the remission marrow in patient 9.
Panels A, B, and C are as designated in Figure 1.
|
|
In summary, rearrangements were detected in the
CD34+CD38 cells in 4 of 10 patients. In the 6 patients in whom rearrangements were not detected, rearrangements if
present, occurred at a frequency below the limit of detection.
 |
Discussion |
Our previous studies,8 have shown that more than 95%
of childhood B-lineage ALL, express CD38. CD34, an HSC-associated antigen, is expressed in 70% of B-cell precursor ALL. Thus one could
postulate that CD34+CD38 cells in the
leukemic samples could potentially be normal HSC and could be devoid of
leukemic progenitors.
We analyzed the remission marrow from 10 patients being treated for
B-cell precursor ALL, to determine if
CD34+CD38 HSC free of leukemia could be
isolated by flow cytometry. Our findings indicate that in 4 of the 10 patients, the clonotypic TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement characteristic
of each patient's leukemia could be detected unequivocally in the
CD34+CD38 population. However, no
rearrangement could be detected in the remaining 6 patients. These
findings demonstrate that our original hypothesis cannot be universally
applicable. Failure to detect a rearrangement could have one of 2 implications either the CD34+CD38 HSC
population in these patients does not contain leukemic cells, or the
number of cells carrying the rearrangement was below the detection
threshold. The detection threshold of the TCR rearrangement ranged
from 10 3 to 10 6 dilution of leukemic cell
DNA into normal DNA for the 10 patients in this study (Table 2). At a
dilution of 10 3 the cell equivalents were calculated to
range between 9 and 74 cells among the various patients (data not
shown). It may not therefore be possible to identify samples with less
than 10% of leukemic progenitors.
Several possible reasons could account for the presence of clonotypic
rearrangements in the CD34+CD38 population.
Although the CD34+CD38 population was
selected on the basis that the cells were CD34bright and
had CD 38 PE fluorescence less than one half of the maximum PE
fluorescence of the isotype control, it is possible that there was some
contamination of the CD34+CD38 population
with CD34+CD38+ cells. However, in all patients
showing the presence of a clonotypic rearrangement in the
CD34+CD38 population, the intensity of the
signal by Southern hybridization was far greater than would be expected
by low level contamination with CD34+CD38+
cells and suggests that a subset of the
CD34+CD38 cells from these patients are leukemic.
A second possibility is that there is genomic instability among the
leukemic cells. If there is no selective pressure to maintain the CD38
marker in the leukemic B-cell progenitor population, the
CD34+CD38 cells sorted out by FACS may be a
subpopulation of leukemic cells that have lost the CD38 marker, not
true stem cells. Such a model would predict that leukemic progenitors
would be present in both the CD34+CD38+ and
CD34+CD38 populations.
A third hypothesis to explain the presence of leukemic cells in the
CD34+CD38 population is that the leukemic
progenitor has a different immunophenotype (CD34+CD38 ) from the predominant phenotype
(CD34+CD38+) seen among the leukemic cells at
diagnosis. If this were true, then there may be limited differentiation
of transformed ALL stem cells. Discrepancies between the phenotype of
the leukemic stem cell and the predominant leukemic population have
been observed in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) and chronic
myeloid leukemia (CML). In studies with acute myeloid leukemia (AML),
Bonnet and Dick have demonstrated that the cell capable of giving rise
to human AML in nonobese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD-SCID) mice, termed the SCID leukemia-initiating cell or SL-IC, has
both the differentiative and proliferative properties as well as the
capacity for self-renewal expected of a leukemic stem
cell.12 The SL-ICs were exclusively
CD34+CD38 . Bonnet and Dick's study concluded
that critical transformation events leading to leukemia occur in normal
very primitive cells, rather than in more mature committed cells. More
recently, Edwards and coworkers reported CD34 positivity in 41% of
acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cases studied and using a
FACS-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approach demonstrated
the t(15;17) translocation in the CD34+CD38
fraction in 2 of the 17 cases studied, indicating that in certain cases
at least, APL originates in very primitive hematopoietic progenitor
cells.13 However, it should be noted that the findings of
Edwards and colleagues are in contrast to those of Turhan and associates who demonstrated from a study of 3 APL patients, that primitive CD34+CD38 HSCs lacked PML-RARA
rearrangements characteristic of APL.14
In a study of patients with Philadelphia chromosome
(Ph1)-ALL it was found that the SL-ICs from all
Ph1-ALL analyzed were exclusively
CD34+CD38 .15 This cell surface
phenotype is similar to that of normal SCID-repopulating cells and
therefore supports the idea that a leukemia-initiating genetic event
might occur at the stem cell level. The inability of this study to find
any SL-IC activity in the CD34+CD38+ fraction
suggests that leukemogenic events do not occur in committed progenitors. In our study, only 3 patients were found to have Ph1-ALL. Of these, only patient 9 showed a clonotypic
V 2-D 3 rearrangement in the CD34+CD38 cells.
A previous study by Quijano and colleagues using FISH demonstrated that
cytogenetically abnormal cells were present in the CD34+CD38 CD33 CD19
cells in 5 of 19 children with ALL.16 With the exception
of one case, the analyses were performed on
CD34+CD38 CD33 CD19
cells from diagnostic marrow samples. In the one case that was performed on remission marrow, no cytogenetically abnormal cells were
found in the
CD34+CD38 CD33 CD19
population. The current study differs from that of Quijano and coworkers in that all of the analyses were performed on remission marrow samples. This strategy was chosen to minimize the possibility that sorter errors in samples in which most of the cells were leukemic
would lead to false-positive results. An alternative strategy
might be to analyze peripheral blood populations, although this might
not be feasible because of the small numbers of
CD34+CD38 cells available from small children.
It has been proposed that a subset of leukemia stem cells with the
capacity for self-renewal and proliferation must maintain the leukemia,
because leukemic blasts themselves have little proliferative capacity.17 Two theories offer possible explanations for
the manner in which leukemia develops and progresses.12
The first theory suggests that cells at various stages of commitment in the stem cell or progenitor hierarchy are targets for malignant transformation.18 The phenotype of the resulting leukemia
is dependent on the degree of commitment of the target cell. The second
theory suggests that although oncogenic mutations occur in primitive
cells, the differences in phenotype and the morphology characteristic
of the leukemia are a result of variations in genetic and environmental
factors.17 The detection of a TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement in the CD34+CD38 fraction in 4 of the 10 patients indicates that at least in some cases of childhood
ALL, the leukemogenic mutation occurs in very primitive progenitor
cells or HSCs. It should also be noted that these cells appear to be
resistant to induction chemotherapy, in contrast to the majority of the
leukemic clone. Differences in the involvement of stem cell
compartments between patients may be responsible for variations in
response to treatment.
Our studies with normal umbilical cord blood cells (data not shown)
show that TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangements occur very infrequently in the
CD34+CD38 populations. Of a total of
1.1 × 104 FACS-sorted CD34+CD38 cells from 5 cord blood samples, 17 clones were analyzed and with the exception of a
single clone, no V 2-D 3 rearrangements were found. Rearrangements
were found with much greater frequency in the
CD34+CD38dim and
CD34+CD38 fractions, and were possibly
concomitant with lymphoid commitment as demonstrated by the expression
of CD7 and CD19. The question of why TCR rearrangements are
observed in the very primitive progenitor population in some of the ALL
cases remains speculative. It could be hypothesized that the etiology
of events causing a leukemogenic mutation in the primitive progenitor
population was simultaneously also the cause of the TCR V 2-D 3 rearrangement.
In vivo studies with immunodeficient mice may be necessary to establish
if the CD34+CD38 populations from the 2 types
of patients seen in this study contain leukemic progenitors or not. It
may also be necessary to refine the immunophenotypic definition of the
normal HSCs to allow resolution of the leukemic and normal stem cell
populations. In early chronic phase CML, Delforge and coworkers have
shown that CD34+ HLA-DR progenitor cells that
are Ph and BCR/ABL messenger RNA are
polyclonal and therefore not leukemic progenitors.19 We are currently evaluating
CD34+CD38 c as the phenotype
of normal HSC20 and
CD34+CD38+/ c+ as a phenotype
of the leukemic stem cell in ALL,21 using the same
strategies described here to detect clonotypic rearrangements in
B-lineage ALL.
 |
Acknowledgments |
We gratefully acknowledge Lora Barsky and Felix Burotto for
their technical expertise in flow cytometry.
 |
Footnotes |
Submitted September 5, 2000; accepted February 26, 2001.
Supported by National Institutes of Health grants PO1 CA 59318 and IP50
HL 55850 (R.P., G.M.C., and K.W.).
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. Therefore,
and solely to indicate this fact,
this article is hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
section 1734.
Reprints: Kenneth Weinberg, Div of Research Immunology/Bone
Marrow Transplantation, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset
Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90027; e-mail: kweinberg{at}chla.usc.edu.
 |
References |
1.
van Dongen JJM, Adriaansen HJ.
Immunobiology of leukemia. In:
Henderson ES,Lister TA,Greaves MF, eds.
Leukemia 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1996:110-119.
2.
Scrideli CA, Simoes AL, Defavery R, Bernades JE, Duarte MHO, Tone LG.
Childhood B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia clonality study by the polymerase chain reaction.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.
1997;19:516-522[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Dupont B.
Immunology of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a brief review of its history.
Immunol Rev.
1997;157:5-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Johns A.
Overview of bone marrow and stem cell transplantation.
J Intravenous Nurs.
1998;21:356-360[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Jones RJ, Miller CB, Zehnbauer BA, Rowley SD, Colvin OM, Sensenbrenner LL.
In vitro evaluation of combination drug purging for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant.
1990;5:301-307[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Kaizer H, Stuart RK, Brookmeyer R, et al.
Autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute leukemia: a phase I study of in vitro treatment of marrow with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide to purge tumor cells.
Blood.
1985;65:1504-1510[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Soiffer RJ, Roy DC, Gonin R, et al.
Monoclonal antibody-purged autologous bone marrow transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia at high risk of relapse.
Bone Marrow Transplant.
1993;12:243-251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Lamkin T, Brooks J, Annett G, Roberts W, Weinberg K.
Immunophenotypic differences between putative hematopoietic stem cells and childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.
Leukemia.
1994;8:1871-1878[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
9.
Terstappen LWMM, Huang S, Safford M, Lansdorp PM, Loken M.
Sequential generations of hematopoietic colonies derived from single non-lineage-committed CD34+CD38 progenitor cells.
Blood.
1991;77:1218-1227[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Hao Q-L, Shah AJ, Thiemann FT, Smogorzewska EM, Crooks GM.
A functional comparison of CD34+CD38 cells in cord blood and bone marrow.
Blood.
1995;86:3745-3753[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Campana D, Yokota S, Coustan-Smith E, Hansen-Hagge TE, Jannosy G, Bartram CR.
The detection of residual acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells with immunologic methods and polymerase chain reaction: a comparative study.
Leukemia.
1990;4:609-614[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
12.
Bonnet D, Dick JE.
Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell.
Nat Med.
1997;3:730-737[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
13.
Edwards RH, Wasik MA, Finan J, et al.
Evidence for early hematopoietic cell involvement in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Am J Clin Pathol.
1999;112:819-827[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Turhan AG, Lemoine FM, Debert ML, et al.
Highly purified primitive hematopoietic stem cells are PML-RARA negative and generate nonclonal progenitors in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Blood.
1995;85:2154-2161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Cobaleda C, Gutierrez-Clanca N, Perez-Losada J, et al.
A primitive hematopoietic cell is the target for the leukemic transformation in human Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
2000;95:1007-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.
Quijano CA, Moore D, Arthur D, Feusner J, Winter SS, Pallavicini MG.
Cytogenetically aberrant cells are present in the CD34+CD33 38 19 marrow compartment in children with acute leukemia.
Leukemia.
1997;11:1508-1515[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
17.
McCulloch E.
Stem cells in normal and leukemic hemopoiesis (Henry Stratton Lecture).
Blood.
1983;62:1-13[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Griffin J, Lowenberg B.
Clonogenic cells in acute myeloblastic leukemia.
Blood.
1986;68:1185-1195[Free Full Text].
19.
Delforge M, Boogaerts MA, McGlave PB, Verfaillie CM.
BCR/ABL CD34+HLA-DR progenitor cells in early chronic phase, but not more advanced phases, of chronic myelogenous leukemia are polyclonal.
Blood.
1999;93:284-292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Hao Q-L, Barsky LW, Yao D, et al.
Functionally different subpopulations of CD34+CD38 hematopoietic progenitors are defined by differential common gamma chain ( C) expression [abstract].
Blood.
1999;94:1120a.
21.
Mascarenhas L, Smogorzewska EM, Burotto F, et al.
Expression of common chain ( C, CD132) and interleukin-7 receptor a (IL-7Ra, CD127) on B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): potential application for depletion of leukemic cells from normal HSC [abstract].
Blood.
1999;94:620a.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Jones, C. D. Gocke, Y. L. Kasamon, C. B. Miller, B. Perkins, J. P. Barber, M. S. Vala, J. M. Gerber, L. L. Gellert, M. Siedner, et al.
Circulating clonotypic B cells in classic Hodgkin lymphoma
Blood,
June 4, 2009;
113(23):
5920 - 5926.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Cox, P. Diamanti, R. S. Evely, P. R. Kearns, and A. Blair
Expression of CD133 on leukemia-initiating cells in childhood ALL
Blood,
April 2, 2009;
113(14):
3287 - 3296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Adamia, A. A. Reichert, H. Kuppusamy, J. Kriangkum, A. Ghosh, J. J. Hodges, P. M. Pilarski, S. P. Treon, M. J. Mant, T. Reiman, et al.
Inherited and acquired variations in the hyaluronan synthase 1 (HAS1) gene may contribute to disease progression in multiple myeloma and Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia
Blood,
December 15, 2008;
112(13):
5111 - 5121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-Y. Wang, F. Young, C.-Y. Chen, B. M. Stevens, S. J. Neering, R. M. Rossi, T. Bushnell, I. Kuzin, D. Heinrich, A. Bottaro, et al.
The biologic properties of leukemias arising from BCR/ABL-mediated transformation vary as a function of developmental origin and activity of the p19ARF gene
Blood,
November 15, 2008;
112(10):
4184 - 4192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Hong, R. Gupta, P. Ancliff, A. Atzberger, J. Brown, S. Soneji, J. Green, S. Colman, W. Piacibello, V. Buckle, et al.
Initiating and Cancer-Propagating Cells in TEL-AML1-Associated Childhood Leukemia
Science,
January 18, 2008;
319(5861):
336 - 339.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Cox, H. M. Martin, P. R. Kearns, P. Virgo, R. S. Evely, and A. Blair
Characterization of a progenitor cell population in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood,
January 15, 2007;
109(2):
674 - 682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Huff, W. Matsui, B. D. Smith, and R. J. Jones
The paradox of response and survival in cancer therapeutics
Blood,
January 15, 2006;
107(2):
431 - 434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hotfilder, S. Rottgers, A. Rosemann, A. Schrauder, M. Schrappe, R. Pieters, H. Jurgens, J. Harbott, and J. Vormoor
Leukemic Stem Cells in Childhood High-Risk ALL/t(9;22) and t(4;11) Are Present in Primitive Lymphoid-Restricted CD34+CD19- Cells
Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2005;
65(4):
1442 - 1449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Cox, R. S. Evely, A. Oakhill, D. H. Pamphilon, N. J. Goulden, and A. Blair
Characterization of acute lymphoblastic leukemia progenitor cells
Blood,
November 1, 2004;
104(9):
2919 - 2925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Jones, W. H. Matsui, and B. D. Smith
Cancer Stem Cells: Are We Missing the Target?
J Natl Cancer Inst,
April 21, 2004;
96(8):
583 - 585.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Matsui, C. A. Huff, Q. Wang, M. T. Malehorn, J. Barber, Y. Tanhehco, B. D. Smith, C. I. Civin, and R. J. Jones
Characterization of clonogenic multiple myeloma cells
Blood,
March 15, 2004;
103(6):
2332 - 2336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hotfilder, S. Rottgers, A. Rosemann, H. Jurgens, J. Harbott, and J. Vormoor
Immature CD34+CD19- progenitor/stem cells in TEL/AML1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia are genetically and functionally normal
Blood,
June 28, 2002;
100(2):
640 - 646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|