Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Signal Transduction
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 15 March 2001, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1823-1834

NEOPLASIA

Cell-cycle-dependent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK-1/2) in myeloid leukemia cell lines and induction of growth inhibition and apoptosis by inhibitors of RAS signaling

Michael A. Morgan, Oliver Dolp, and Christoph W. M. Reuter

From the Department of Hematology and Oncology, Section Molecular Biology, University of Ulm, Germany.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Disruption of the RAS-to-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling pathway, either directly through activating RAS gene mutations or indirectly through other genetic aberrations, plays an important role in the molecular pathogenesis of myeloid leukemias. Constitutive activation of ERK-1/2 and MEK-1/2, which elicit oncogenic transformation in fibroblasts, has recently been observed in acute myeloid leukemias (AML). In this study, the activation of the RAS-to-MAPK cascade in 14 AML and 5 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines is examined and correlated with the effects of a panel of 9 RAS signaling inhibitors on cell viability, colony formation, cell-cycle progression, and induction of apoptosis. Activation of MEK, ERK, and the transcription factors CREB-1, ATF-1, and c-Myc is demonstrated in the majority of the cell lines (9 of 14 AML and 2 of 5 CML cell lines). Although activation of the ERK cascade did not always correlate with the presence of activating RAS mutations or BCR-Abl, it is linked to the G0/G1 and the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. In contrast to most inhibitors (eg, B581, Cys-4-Abs-Met, FPT-2, FTI-276, and FTS), a significant growth inhibition was only observed for FTI-277 (19 of 19), FPT-3 (10 of 19), and the MEK inhibitors U0126 (19 of 19) and PD098059 (8 of 19). Treatment of NB-4 cells with FTI-277 primarily resulted in a G2/M block, whereas treatment with FPT-3 and U0126 led to induction of apoptosis. FTI-277 revealed strong toxicity toward normal purified CD34+ cells. The results suggest differences in the mechanisms of action and support a potential therapeutic usefulness of these inhibitors in the treatment of myeloid leukemias. (Blood. 2001;97:1823-1834)

© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

The deregulation of RAS signal transduction has been implicated in the malignant growth of human cancer cells including myeloid leukemias.1,2 RAS proto-oncogenes (H-RAS, N-RAS, and K-RAS) encode 21-kd G-proteins that play key roles in signal transduction, proliferation, differentiation, and malignant transformation.3-5 RAS proteins are produced as cytoplasmatic precursors, which require several posttranslational modifications (eg, prenylation, proteolysis, carboxymethylation, and palmitoylation) for membrane binding and full biologic activity.3-8 RAS functions as a biologic switch that relays signals from ligand-stimulated tyrosine kinase, cytokine, and heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors to cytoplasmatic mitgen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades. In its activated, GTP-bound state, RAS binds to and activates effector molecules such as Rafs, MEKK, PI-3K, and Ral-GEF.3-5,8-14 Raf kinases (A-Raf, B-Raf, c-Raf-1) selectively phosphorylate and activate MAPK kinases (MAPKK) MEK-1/2 in the MAPK/ERK pathway.13-17 MEK-1/2 are dual specificity kinases that activate MAPKs (ERK-1/2).18,19 The best-characterized ERK substrates are cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), ribosomal protein S6 kinases (RSKs), and transcription factors Elk-1 and CREB-1.18-20

The importance of deregulation of ERK signaling in the molecular pathogenesis of myeloid leukemias is underscored by the positioning of several oncogene and tumor suppressor gene products on this pathway.5,21-23 RAS mutations are frequent genetic aberrations found in 20% to 30% of all human tumors, although the incidences in tumor type vary greatly.1,2 The most commonly observed RAS mutations arise at sites critical for RAS regulation, namely codons 12, 13, and 61.1,2,5,9 Additionally, mutations occur at codons 15, 16, 18, and 31.24,25 These mutations result in abrogation of normal intrinsic or GAP-stimulated GTPase activity of RAS, leading to increased half-lives of mutant RAS-GTP.5,9,26 Transformation results, at least in part, from deregulated stimulation of mitogenic signal transduction pathways.1,2,5 The highest incidences of RAS mutations were detected in carcinomas of pancreas (90%), thyroid (50%), colon (50%), and lung (30%). RAS mutations are also frequently observed in myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemias (AML), juvenile myelomonocytic myeloid leukemia (JMML), and multiple myelomas (20%-40%).1,2,5,21-23 N-RAS is mutated in the majority of cases and presence of the mutation is not associated with any particular FAB type, cytogenetic abnormality, or clinical feature including prognosis.22

In addition to activation by mutation, RAS is also deregulated in myeloid leukemias by constitutive activation of proto-oncogenes such as receptor or nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs and NRTKs) or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.5,21-23 RTKs are constitutively activated by single point mutations (eg, colony-stimulating factor-1 [CSF-1] receptor and c-Kit receptor), duplications of juxtamembrane domain-coding sequences (eg, FLT3 receptor), or deletions of the negative regulatory regions in ligand binding or transmembrane domains.5,21,27-31 Additionally, translocations involving RTKs and NRTKs produce chimeric proteins in which varying N-terminal portions of either the ligand-binding or the transmembrane domain are replaced with novel protein sequences (BCR-Abl in CML, Abl-TEL in AML, and TEL-PDGFRbeta in CMML).5,32-37 These fusion tyrosine kinases have been shown to activate RAS.32-37 The product of the NF-1 tumor suppressor gene, neurofibromin, encodes an RAS-GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and is mutated in the autosomal dominant type 1 neurofibromatosis, which is associated with an increased tendency to develop myeloid leukemias, especially JMML.5,38-41 Leukemic cells from children with type 1 neurofibromatosis show a moderate elevation in the percentage of GTP-RAS.38-41

Because the frequency of RAS mutations is among the highest for any gene in human cancers, development of inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway as potential anticancer agents is a promising pharmacologic strategy.5,42-44 One strategy to impede oncogenic RAS function in vivo is the inhibition of RAS posttranslational modification (eg, inhibitors of FTase, GGTase, PPMTase, REPase).5 Another strategy is the inhibition of downstream effectors of RAS (eg, geldanamycin, sulindac, and MEK inhibitors).5 Inhibitors of RAS signaling revert RAS-dependent transformation and cause regression of RAS-dependent tumors in animal models. The most promising new class of these potential cancer therapeutics is the farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs).42-44 In contrast to many conventional chemotherapeutics, FTIs are remarkably specific and cause no gross systemic toxicity in animals. Some inhibitors (eg, R115777, SCH66336, and L-778123) are presently being evaluated in phase I and phase II clinical trials.5,45,46

Based on the wealth of data reporting the effectiveness of RAS signaling inhibitors against human carcinomas harboring activated RAS, coupled with the implications of RAS in the pathophysiology of myeloid leukemias, the role of activated RAS signaling and the effects of these inhibitors on leukemia cell growth were investigated. Although we demonstrate an activation of MEKs, ERKs, and CREB-1/ATF-1 in myeloid leukemia cell lines, the presence of RAS mutations and BCR-Abl did not always correlate with an activation of the RAS-to-MAPK pathway. Interestingly, MEK-1/2 activation coincided with the G0/G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Regardless of the presence of MAPK activation, incubation with various inhibitors (eg, FTI-277, FPT-3, U0126, and PD098059) of the RAS-to-MAPK cascade led to substantial growth inhibition of most myeloid leukemia cell lines tested. Incubation of NB-4 cells with FPT-3 or U0126 induced apoptotic DNA fragmentation and exposure of phosphatidylserine on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. In contrast, treatment of NB-4 cells with FTI-277 primarily induced a G2/M block. Treatment with FTI-277 also inhibited colony formation of purified human CD34+ cells. These results suggest differences in the mechanisms of action and a potential role of some of these inhibitors in the treatment of myeloid leukemias.


    Materials and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells and antibodies

Cell lines were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany). Antibodies against H-, K-, and N-RAS, ERK-1/2, MEK-1/2, monophospho- and diphospho-ERK-1/2 (PP-ERK-1/2) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc (Santa Cruz, CA) and Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany). Diphospho-MEK-1/2 (PP-MEK-1/2), CREB-1, and phospho-CREB-1 antibodies were from New England Biolabs (Frankfurt, Germany). Inhibitors were purchased from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (Bad Soden, Germany).

Trypan blue exclusion assay

Cells (2.5 or 6.25 × 104 cells in 250 µL media) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated 4 days with either solvent control or the stated concentration of inhibitor. Cell counts were evaluated using a 1:1 dilution of cell suspension in 0.4% trypan blue solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Viable and nonviable cells were counted in a Neubauer cell counting chamber.

Colony-forming assays

Colony-forming assays were performed essentially as described.47 Briefly, cells were seeded at 1.0 to 2.5 × 105/mL cell suspension in 96-well plates and treated with inhibitors as indicated. After 4 days, aliquots of the cell suspensions were plated in 400 µL methylcult H4230 (Cellsystems Biotech, St Katharinen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions and incubated 7 to 14 days. Cell densities were evaluated and aggregates of more than 25 cells were scored as colonies.

Western blot analysis

Cells were cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, glutamine (292 µg/mL), and antibiotics (penicillin 60.2 mg/mL, streptomycin 133 µg/mL). Cell extracts were prepared and Western blotting was performed as described.48,49 Cellular protein concentrations were determined using the Coomassie dye-binding assay according to Bradford50 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

MAPK assays

The MAPK assays were performed as previously described.48,49

RAS-GTP pulldown assay

The RAS-GTP pulldown assays were accomplished as described.51,52 The pGEX 2T-RBD construct (encoding a GST fusion protein containing amino acids 51-131 of c-Raf-1) was a gift from J. Bos. GST-RBD expression in Escherichia coli was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 2 to 3 hours. Bacteria were sonicated in 50 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5 mM DTT and 1 µg/mL aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A. After addition of 1% Triton X-100, clarified lysates were aliquoted and stored at -80°C as glycerol stocks (10%). The fusion protein was purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads (35 µL/sample, Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). For affinity precipitation, the beads were washed 3 times with lysis buffer (1 mL), incubated with fresh cell lysates (1 mg total protein) 30 minutes at 4°C, and collected by centrifugation (12 000g at 4°C). After washing 3 times with 100 to 200 µL lysis buffer and incubation in loading buffer (5 minutes at 95°C), samples were analyzed by 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and subjected to Western blotting using antibodies against H-, K-, and N-RAS to identify GTP-bound RAS.

Cell-cycle analysis

Cell permeabilization (1-2 × 106 cells) was performed using the GAS-002 kit from Bio Research (Kaumberg, Austria) essentially according to the manufacturer's instructions. After washing in PBS, fixation in 100 µL buffer A (15 minutes), and permeabilization in 100 µL buffer B (10 minutes), 5 µL of the primary antibodies (alpha MEK-1, alpha PP-MEK-1/2, alpha ERK-2, alpha PP-ERK-1/2) or negative control antibodies were added (1 hour at room temperature). Cells were washed with 3 mL 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS, and 3 µL of the appropriate fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary immunoglobulins were added (20 minutes in the dark). After washing with 3 mL 0.1% BSA-PBS, cells were incubated in propidium iodide staining buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.1% Triton-X-100, 15 µg/mL RNase A, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 µg/mL propidium iodide, 15-30 minutes at 4°C in the dark). The cell-cycle profiles (10 000 cells) were analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) using the Modfit LT 2.0 software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME).

Immunocytochemical staining

Cells were washed twice in PBS and cytospin slides were prepared using standard techniques. Slides were air-dried for 2 to 24 hours and processed for staining or wrapped airtight and stored at -20°C. Immunocytochemical staining of the slides was done using the Dako LSAB+ kit (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After fixation in 3% paraformaldehyde (30 minutes, 4°C), cells were washed 3 times with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T buffer; 5 minutes) and once with TBS buffer (2 minutes). Slides were incubated in 100% methanol (10 minutes, -20°C), washed in TBS-T buffer (3 times, each 5 minutes), and blocked with 5% horse serum in TBS-T buffer (1 hour, room temperature). Incubation with primary antibodies (alpha MEK-1, alpha PP-MEK-1/2, alpha ERK-2, alpha PP-ERK-1/2) or negative control antibodies was done overnight at 4°C (1:400 in 5% BSA-TBS-T buffer). After washing in TBS-T (15 minutes) followed by 0.1% BSA-TBS-T (2 minutes) and incubation with appropriate biotinylated secondary immunoglobulins (DAKO) staining and counterstaining with hematoxylin was performed.

Sequencing of RAS mutations

Synthetic oligonucleotides were purchased from MWG-Biotech AG (Ebersberg, Germany) for use as amplification primers to identify mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61 of N-RAS, H-RAS, and K-RAS.53,54 Genomic DNA (gDNA) samples were prepared using a kit from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). Fragments of 103 and 109 base pairs (bp) containing the codons of interest were obtained by amplification of 200 ng gDNA with AmpliTaq Gold (PE Applied Biosystems, Langen, Germany). The DNA was purified by 3% agarose gel electophoresis, recovered with a Qiaex II gel extraction kit (Qiagen), and cloned using the TOPO-TA Cloning Kit from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). M13 forward and reverse primers were used for sequencing 400- to 600-ng plasmids using the Big Dye Sequencing kit from PE Applied Biosystems. The products of polymerase chain reaction were precipitated, washed with 70% ethanol, air-dried, and redissolved in 20 µL high-performance liquid chromatography-grade H2O and analyzed by an ABI Prism Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems).

Detection of apoptosis

For detection and quantification of apoptosis at the single cell level, the in situ cell death detection kit of Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) was used. Labeling of DNA strand breaks was done according to the manufacturer's instructions applying the TUNEL method. In addition, the annexin V-PE/7-amino-actinomycin (7-AAD) double-staining method was used to quantitatively determine the percentage of cells that are actively undergoing apoptosis. After washing once with PBS and twice with annexin V-binding buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2), cells were resuspended in annexin V-binding buffer (1 mL) and 5 µL annexin V-PE (BD Pharmingen/Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) was added. After 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark, washing twice with annexin V-binding buffer (1 mL) and resuspension in 200 µL, 40 µL 7-AAD solution (0.2 mg/mL PBS) was added (20 minutes at 4°C in the dark). Finally, 300 µL annexin V- binding buffer was added to each tube and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.


    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Activation of the RAS-to-MAP kinase cascade

RAS mutations. The gDNA of several myeloid cell lines was analyzed for activating mutations in codons 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, and 61 of H-, K- and N-RAS to correlate the frequency of RAS mutations with the presence of constitutive activation of the ERK pathway. Four of 14 AML cell lines (28.6%) contained activating RAS mutations (Table 1). As previously reported, a mutation of codon 12 of N-RAS was detected in THP-1 (GGT to GAT) and a N-RAS codon 61 mutation in HL-60 (CAA to CTA) resulting in G12D and Q61L.55 Two AML cell lines (Kasumi-1 and MV4-11) were found to harbor a K-RAS codon 12 mutation (GGT to GAT), which also exchanges Gly12 with Asp. Interestingly, an additional K-RAS codon 18 mutation was found in the second allele of MV4-11 (GCC to GAC), which leads to replacement of A18D. No activating mutations of codons 15 and 16 or of the H-RAS gene were detected. Three cell lines (MV4-11, Kasumi-1, and NB-4) harbored a silent point mutation in codon 59 (GCC to GCT).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Activation of the RAS-to-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade in myeloid leukemia cell lines

RAS activation assays. The expression of all 3 RAS isoforms (H-, K- and N-RAS) was detected by Western blotting of the cellular lysates of all myeloid cell lines tested (not shown). To identify the presence of GTP-RAS, cell lysates were incubated with the minimal RAS-binding domain (RBD) of C-Raf-1. Western blotting with antibodies against H-, K- and N-RAS was performed to detect the binding of GTP-RAS with GST-RBD. Cellular lysates of H-RAS (L-61)-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were used as a positive control for activated H-RAS. As shown in Figure 1, only oncogenic H-RAS (L61) could be precipitated with GST-RBD from NIH-3T3 lysates, but not endogenous K- or N-RAS. THP-1 and HL-60, which harbor N-RAS mutations in codon 12 and codon 61, showed only a slight activation of N-RAS in some experiments but no activation of H-RAS or K-RAS. Surprisingly, lysates of Kasumi-1 and MV4-11, which harbor a K-RAS codon 12 mutation, did not contain substantial amounts of activated K-RAS. Although most lysates of cell lines with wild-type RAS did not contain significant amounts of GTP-RAS, high levels of activated H-, K- and N-RAS were found in NB-4 and ML-2 cell lysates. No apparent activation of RAS was detected in the CML cell lines, although all express the activated BCR-Abl fusion tyrosine kinase, which has been reported to induce RAS activation.5,39,40 Of the 5 growth factor-dependent myeloid cell lines (AML-OCI-5, Mo-7e, JK-1, Mutz-2, and Mutz-3), activation of H-, K-, and N-RAS was observed only in AML-OCI-5 on stimulation by interleukin 3 or conditioned medium of 5637 kidney cells (not shown).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Activation of RAS in myeloid leukemia cell lines. Lysates of myeloid leukemia cell lines were subjected to affinity precipitation (AP) with GST-RBD as described in "Materials and methods." RAS proteins were detected by immunoblotting with H-, K-, and N-RAS antibodies. H-RAS (L61)-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were used as a positive control for activated H-RAS.

Activation of the MAPK cascade. To determine the frequency and the level of activation of signaling proteins downstream of RAS, lysates of myeloid cells were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies against PP-MEK-1/2 and PP-ERK-1/2 (Figure 2). Cellular lysates of H-RAS (L-61)-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were used as a positive control for activated MEK-1/2 and ERK-1/2. Significant activation of MEK-1/2 was detected in 8 of 14 AML cell lines and 2 of 5 CML cell lines. ERK-1/2 activation was observed in 9 of 14 AML cell lines and 2 of 5 CML cell lines. MEK-1/2 activation correlated with ERK-1/2 activation in 7 of 14 AML cell lines and 2 of 5 CML cell lines. Western blots for diphospho-ERK-1/2 were confirmed by immunocomplex MAPK assays using an ERK-2 antibody, which cross-reacts with ERK-1 (Figure 3). The presence of PP-ERK-1/2 in Western blots of cellular lysates correlated closely with MAPK/ERK activity in immunocomplex kinase assays. Compared to leukemia cell lines, H-RAS (L-61)-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts harbored at least 50% higher amounts of PP-ERK-1/2. The presence of RAS mutations or BCR-Abl did not always correlate with significant ERK-1/2 activation (Table 1).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Activation of ERK-1/2 and MEK-1/2 in myeloid leukemia cell lines. Myeloid leukemia cell lysates were adjusted for protein concentration and equal amounts of total cell protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Western analysis was performed with antibodies against MEK-1, ERK-2, PP-MEK-1/2, and PP-ERK-1/2. L61-H-RAS-transformed NIH-3T3 cell lysates were used as positive controls for the RAS-induced activation of ERKs and MEKs.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Activation of ERK-2 in myeloid leukemia cell lines. Lysates of myeloid leukemia cell lines were subjected to immunoprecipitation with an antibody against ERK-2 (which also cross-reacts with ERK-1). After washing the immunoprecipitates, immunocomplex kinase assays were performed as described in "Materials and methods." (A) Western blot of the immunoprecipitates with an antibody specific for ERK-2 and an antibody specific for activated PP-ERK-1/2. (B) Autoradiogram of kinase assay demonstrating MBP phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated ERK-1/2. N-RAS (L61)-transformed NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were used as a positive control for the RAS-induced activation of ERK-1/2. A nonspecific antibody was used as a negative control.

Activation of transcription factors. Following activation, ERK-1/2 translocates to the nucleus resulting in phosphorylation and activation of transcription factors such as ELK-1, CREB-1, and Myc. To determine whether activation of ERK-1/2 induces activation of these transcription factors, myeloid leukemia cell lysates were subjected to Western blotting with specific antibodies against phospho-ELK, phospho-CREB, and phospho-Myc. Activated CREB-1/ATF-1 was found in 11 of 14 AML cell lines and 2 of 5 CML cell lines and did not always coincide with the presence of phospho-ERK-1/2 (Figure 4 and Table 1).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Activation of MAPK-dependent transcription factors in myeloid leukemia cell lines. Lysates of myeloid leukemia cell lines were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-c-Myc (A) and anti-CREB-1 (B) antibodies. Activated c-Myc and CREB-1/ATF-1 were detected with phosphospecific antibodies against activated c-Myc and CREB-1.

Intracellular localization of PP-ERK-1/2 and PP-MEK-1/2. To determine whether activation of ERK-1/2 and MEK-1/2 was limited to subpopulations of myeloid leukemia cells, cytospins were prepared and stained with specific antibodies against ERK-2, MEK-1, PP-ERK-1/2, and PP-MEK-1/2 (Figure 5). All cells were stained with anti-ERK-2 and anti-MEK-1 antibodies. However, only 1% to 5% of cells showed strong staining with anti-PP-ERK-1/2 and anti-PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies. Strong nuclear staining was found in approximately 50% of PP-ERK-1/2+ and PP-MEK-1/2+ cells, whereas the other portion showed mainly cytoplasmic staining. These results were obtained for all samples tested and suggest activation of ERKs and MEKs in subpopulations (eg, cells in certain phases of the cell cycle).


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunocytostaining of myeloid leukemia cells with PP-ERK-1/2 and PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies. Cytospins of myeloid leukemia cells were stained with antibodies specific for ERK-2, PP-ERK-1/2, MEK-1, and PP-MEK-1/2 as described in "Materials and methods." Approximately 1% to 5% of the cells were strongly stained with anti-PP-ERK-1/2 and anti-PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies. Note the nuclear staining of some cells, whereas others are stained mainly in the cytoplasm.

MEK activation during cell-cycle progression. To address the possibility of ERK-1/2 and MEK-1/2 activation during cell-cycle progression, a novel FACS method for cytoplasmic staining of activated kinases of the RAS pathway was developed. Cells were double stained with propidium iodide and antibodies specific for different members of the ERK signaling pathway (eg, ERK-2, PP-ERK-1/2, MEK-1, and PP-MEK-1/2). As shown in Figure 6, panels B and C, all cells were strongly positive for ERK-2 and MEK-1. Using anti-PP-ERK-1/2 and anti-PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies, most cells were only slightly positive (Figure 6D,E). Interestingly, PP-MEK-1/2 staining revealed 2 additional, strongly positive cell populations (Figure 6E) that corresponded to the G0/G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. The difference in PP-ERK-1/2 and PP-MEK-1/2 staining might be due to rapid nuclear translocation of PP-ERK-1/2. Incubation with excess thymidine (2.5 mM) resulted in a G1/S-phase block with an increase of S-phase cells to 60.1% and a concomitant reduction of PP-MEK-1/2+ cells in G0/G1 and G2/M (< 0.1% of the total cell population; Figure 6G,H). Cell viability was not significantly affected by this treatment. Treatment of cells with vinblastine (5 µg/mL, 10 hours), which induces depolymerization of mitotic interpolar microtubules and a cell metaphase block, increased the mitotic population of cells in G2/M to 80.9% and the amount of strongly positive PP-MEK-1/2 cells in G2/M to 13.1% (Figure 6I,J). These results demonstrate MEK-1/2 activation in the G0/G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle of myeloid leukemia cells.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Activation of MEK-1/2 during cell-cycle progression. HL-60 cells were prepared for FACS analysis as described in "Materials and methods." Graph A shows a representative control with unspecific mouse IgG antibodies. Similar results were obtained with rabbit and goat controls (data not shown). All cells were clearly positive when probed with ERK-2 or MEK-1 antibodies (graphs B,C), and only slightly positive when stained with phosphospecific antibodies against activated PP-ERK-1/2 and PP-MEK-1/2 (graphs D,E). Graph F shows the cell-cycle profile of untreated HL-60 cells stained with propidium iodide. Additionally, PP-MEK-1/2 staining revealed 2 strongly positive populations, which correlated with the G0/G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle (graphs E,F). Treatment of HL-60 cells with excess thymidine (2.5 mM) for 10 hours: G, staining with anti-PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies; H, cell-cycle profile. Treatment of HL-60 cells with 5 µg/mL vinblastine for 10 hours: I, staining with anti-PP-MEK-1/2 antibodies; J, cell-cycle profile.

Effect of inhibitors of RAS-to-MAPK signaling on myeloid leukemia cell growth

Because activation of the ERK pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of myeloid leukemias, the effectiveness of several different types of inhibitors of RAS signaling was tested on viability and colony formation of myeloid leukemia cell lines. The cell lines tested are shown in Table 1 and included some that express mutationally activated N-RAS, K-RAS, or BCR-Abl. Purified CD34+ cells were used as a control for inhibitor specificity. Inhibitors used in this study included (1) MEK inhibitors U0126 and PD098059, (2) farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP)-based farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitors FPT-II and FPT-III, (3) CAAX-based FTIs FTI-276, FTI-277, B581, and Cys-4-Abz-Met, and the (4) prenylated protein methyltransferase (PPMTase) inhibitor FTS. To screen the compounds for growth inhibition of myeloid leukemia cells, liquid suspension cultures were incubated with 50 µM inhibitor or an equal volume of solvent. After 24 to 96 hours of incubation, a decrease in cell viability was observed in trypan blue exclusion assays in some inhibitor-treated samples. Therefore, all myeloid cell lines were preincubated in liquid suspension cultures for 96 hours followed by incubation in methylcellulose to assay colony formation in the presence or absence of inhibitor. Limited growth inhibition was obtained by treatment with 50 µM FTI-276, B-581, and Cys-4-Abz-Met (Tables 2 and 3). Growth inhibition greater than 70% was observed with 50 µM FPP-competitive FTIs FPT-3 (10 of 19), FPT-2 (4 of 19), the CAAX-based FTase inhibitor FTI-277 (19 of 19), and the PPMTase inhibitor FTS (3 of 19; Tables 2 and 3). Growth inhibition greater than 70% was also observed with MEK inhibitors PD098059 (8 of 19) and U0126 (19 of 19) (Table 3). In contrast to other inhibitors, FTI-277 elicited substantial toxicity toward purified CD34+ human stem cells. Because it has previously been reported that this compound causes nonspecific toxicity at concentrations greater than 20 µM, we studied the concentration dependency of these inhibitors on cell viability and colony formation. Only minor growth inhibitory effects on purified CD34+ cells were observed in the presence of DMSO, or U0126 and FPT-3 at concentrations up to 50 µM (Figure 7). FTI-277 caused inhibition of stem cell colony formation with an inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) value of 10 µM. The NB-4, ML-2, and THP-1 cells showed significant leukemia selective inhibition of colony formation in the presence of FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277. The IC50 values for FTI-277 were less than 5 µM for these cell lines, suggesting that FTI-277 may elicit leukemia-specific toxicity in some cell lines. However, HL-60 and MV4-11 cells revealed IC50 values for FTI-277 similar to the IC50 values determined for purified CD34+ cells. HL-60 and MV4-11 colony formation was significantly inhibited in the presence of U0126, but HL-60 cells were resistant to FPT-3 (Figure 7).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Inhibition of colony formation and cell viability of myeloid leukemia cell lines by farnesyltransferase inhibitors


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Inhibition of colony formation and cell viability of myeloid leukemia cell lines by MEK and PPMTase



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Inhibition of colony growth by the addition of U0126, FPT-3, and FTI-277. Purified human CD34+ cells and myeloid leukemia cell lines were incubated in liquid suspension cultures with increasing concentrations of the MEK inhibitor U0126, the FPP-based FTI FPT-3, and the CAAX-based FTase inhibitor FTI-277. After 4 days, viability of the cells was determined by trypan blue dye assays. Aliquots of the samples were incubated in methylcellulose for an additional 7 to 14 days in the presence of freshly added inhibitors. Representative experiments are shown. Results are expressed in percentage inhibition of maximal spontaneous colony growth or cell density. Error bars indicate the SE of margin.

Effect of inhibitors of RAS-to-MAPK signaling on cell-cycle progression

To elucidate the effects of the most potent inhibitors on cell-cycle progression of leukemia cells, NB-4 cells were incubated 18 and 36 hours in the presence of 50 µM FPT-3, 50 µM U0126, and 20 µM FTI-277 (Figures 8 and 9). NB-4 cells were studied because they showed strong activation of the RAS pathway and revealed high sensitivity toward inhibitors of RAS signaling. After incubation with FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277, double staining with propidium iodide and anti-P-MEK-1/2 antibodies was performed and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Incubation with DMSO for 18 hours elicited no substantial changes in NB-4 cell-cycle progression (Figure 8). However, incubation with DMSO for 36 hours resulted in an increase of the G0/G1 fraction to 63.5% compared to 48.5% in untreated controls (Figure 9A,B). In DMSO-treated control cells, 0.83% showed strong activation of MEK-1/2 in the G0/G1 phase and 2.4% in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. These subpopulations were slightly reduced after 36 hours (Figure 9A,B).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effects of U0126, FPT-3, or FTI-277 treatment for 18 hours on the cell-cycle-dependent activation of MEK-1/2. NB-4 cells were incubated in the absence or the presence of 50 µM FPT-3, 50 µM U0126, or 20 µM FTI-277. After 18 hours, double staining with propidium iodide and an antibody specific for activated PP-MEK-1/2 was performed as described in "Materials and methods." Representative cell-cycle profiles (left) and FACS profiles of the double staining (right) are shown. (A) Untreated NB-4 cells; (B) solvent-treated (DMSO) NB-4 cells; (C) NB-4 cells treated with 50 µM FPT-3; (D) NB-4 cells treated with 20 µM FTI-277; (E) NB-4 cells treated with 50 µM U0126.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Effects of U0126 or FTI-277 treatment for 36 hours on the cell-cycle-dependent activation of MEK-1/2. NB-4 cells were incubated in the absence or the presence of 50 µM U0126 or 20 µM FTI-277. After 36 hours, double staining with propidium iodide and an antibody specific for activated PP-MEK-1/2 was performed as described in "Materials and methods." Representative cell-cycle profiles (left) and FACS profiles of the double staining (right) are shown. (A) Untreated NB-4 cells; (B) solvent-treated (DMSO) NB-4 cells; (C) NB-4 cells treated with 20 µM FTI-277; (D) NB-4 cells treated with 50 µM U0126. NB-4 cells treated with FPT-3 are not shown because of nearly complete apoptosis at this time point.

After 18 hours of incubation with 50 µM FPT-3, a strong increase of the sub-G0/G1 fraction (debris) was observed, suggesting rapid induction of apoptotic DNA fragmentation (increase of debris from 13.5% to 35.8%; Figure 8C). Furthermore, the G0/G1 fraction increased to 46.8%. PP-MEK-1/2+ cells were reduced to 1.3% in G2/M, but remained unchanged in G0/G1 (1.09% versus 0.83% and 1.34% for DMSO and negative controls). A 36-hour treatment of NB-4 cells with FPT-3 resulted in nearly complete apoptotic DNA fragmentation (not shown).

Incubation with FTI-277 for 18 hours led to an increase of cellular debris to 16.1%, an increase of PP-MEK-1/2+ cells in G2/M to 5.5% but a decrease in G0/G1 to 0.34% (Figure 8D). FTI-277 treatment for 36 hours induced a G2/M block with 66.6% of cells in G2/M as well as an increase of PP-MEK-1/2+ cells in G2/M to 13.5%, but a decrease in G0/G1 to 0.46% (Figure 9C).

Treatment with U0126 for 18 hours induced an increase of cellular debris to 22.4%, an increase in the G0/G1 fraction to 46.6%, and a slight decrease in PP-MEK-1/2+ cells in G0/G1 (0.56% versus 0.83%; Figure 8B,D). After 36 hours of incubation with U0126 the sub-G0/G1 debris increased to 26.5% and the PP-MEK-1/2+ cells were further reduced to 0.08% in G0/G1 and 0.37% in G2/M (Figure 9D).

Apoptosis induction by treatment with FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277

Staining with propidium iodide demonstrated an increase of the sub-G0/G1 fraction (debris) after treatment of NB-4 cells with U0126 and FPT-3 (Figures 8 and 9) suggesting apoptotic DNA fragmentation. To confirm induction of apoptosis by these inhibitors, NB-4 cells were incubated for 18 and 36 hours with FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277. DNA strand breaks were detected by labeling with flourescein-dUTP using the TUNEL method. Externalization of membrane phosphatidylserine during early stages of apoptosis was monitored by a 7-AAD assay. Annexin V binds to negatively charged phospholipid surfaces with a higher specificity for phosphatidylserine than most other phospholipids. 7-AAD was used for the exclusion of nonviable cells. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for detection and quantification of apoptosis at the single cell level. The presence of DMSO had no effect on DNA degradation or exposure of phosphatidylserine (Figure 10B). Treatment with FPT-3 resulted in apoptotic DNA fragmentation (86.5% after 18 hours) and exposure of phosphatidylserine on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane (87.3% after 36 hours of incubation; Figure 10C). Similarly, treatment with U0126 induced DNA cleavage (47.4%) and externalization of phosphatidylserine (81.5%; Figure 10E). In contrast, FTI-277 treatment for 18 and 36 hours, which caused a G2/M block, did not induce apoptosis (Figure 10D). These differences toward FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277 in cellular response suggest different mechanisms of action.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Induction of apoptosis by treatment with FPT-3, FTI-277, or U0126. NB-4 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 50 µM FPT3, 50 µM U0126, or 20 µM FTI-277. After 18 hours, cells were harvested and labeling of DNA strand breaks was performed applying the TUNEL method as described in "Materials and methods" (left). M1 indicates no DNA fragmentation; M2, DNA fragmentation. Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane was detected using an Annexin V-PE/7AAD double staining method as described in "Materials and methods" (right). Apoptotic exposure of phosphatidylserine is shown in the upper right square. Results are given in percentage of total cell population. (A) Untreated NB-4 cells; (B) solvent-treated (DMSO) NB-4 cells; (C) FPT-3-treated NB-4 cells; (D) FTI-277-treated NB-4 cells; (E) U0126-treated NB-4 cells.


    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Accumulating evidence supports a role of the deregulation of RAS function in the molecular pathogenesis of myeloid leukemias.5,21-23 The importance of the RAS-to-MAPK pathway is underscored by the positioning of several oncogene and tumor suppressor gene products on this pathway. Furthermore, mutant N-RAS induces myeloproliferative disorders resembling human CML, AMLs, and apoptotic syndromes similar to human myelodysplastic syndromes in bone marrow-repopulated mice.56 Possible effects of deregulated signaling through the RAS-to-MAPK cascade include an increase in proliferation and cell-cycle progression or inhibition of differentiation and apoptosis.

Constitutive activation of ERKs has previously been reported in 37 of 73 cases of AML.57-59 Consistently, our present study demonstrates ERK activation in 9 of 14 AML and 2 of 5 CML cell lines. Furthermore, 4 of 14 AML cell lines (28.6%) harbored activating mutations of N-RAS and K-RAS. Interestingly, in MV4-11 2 allelic K-RAS mutations were detected (codons 12 and 18). Mutations of "non-hot spot" codons 15, 16, 18, and 31 in K-RAS frequently occur in addition to the classical codon 12, 13, and 61 mutations.24,25 The identification of K-RAS and "non-hot spot" mutations in our study demonstrates that the frequency of RAS mutations in myeloid leukemia may be underestimated in the published literature because most series did not analyze all 3 RAS genes and "non-hot spot" codons such as 15, 16, 18, and 31. In agreement with recent reports, we demonstrate that ERK-1/2 activation in myeloid leukemia cell lines does not always correlate with the presence of activating RAS mutations or BCR-Abl.57-59 Others have suggested that the constitutive activation of ERK-1/2 in AML cells is a result of ERK-1/2 hyperexpression and down-regulation of PAC1, a member of the MAPK phosphatase family.59 Our study reveals that approximately 5% of all cells showed strong ERK-1/2 and MEK-1/2 activation on immunocytochemical staining with specific antibodies against PP-ERK-1/2 and PP-MEK-1/2. Two patterns of staining were observed: cytoplasmic and nuclear staining. These observations are in agreement with reports that ERKs and MEKs are phosphorylated and activated after growth factor stimulation in the cytoplasm and then translocated into the nucleus.60-68 Nuclear translocation of ERK-1/2 is a key signaling event for activation of nuclear processes such as transcription.69 In contrast to stable nuclear presence of PP-ERK for several hours, a nuclear export signal (NES) between residues 32 and 42 of MEK-1/2 leads to rapid removal of MEKs from the nucleus.63,67

Additionally, our study shows that activation of the ERK cascade in myeloid leukemia cell lines is linked to the G0/G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Requirement for ERK activation in the G1 phase and the M phase of the cell cycle of fibroblasts has been reported in several studies.69-76 ERK-1/2 expression increases in mid-G1 phase and ERK phosphorylation and activation occurs during G1 phase.72,73 After phosphorylation and activation in the cytoplasm, PP-ERK is translocated to the nucleus during late/mid-G1 phase.72,73 Nuclear ERK-regulated events required for progression into S phase include expression of immediate early genes such as Fos and Egr-1, and transcriptional up-regulation of cyclin D1. ERKs and MEKs are also activated early in prophase of mitosis before nuclear envelope breakdown.75-78 In prophase, activated ERKs associate at kinetochores and within the chromosomal periphery of condensed chromosomes.77,78 Activated ERKs and MEKs localize to spindle poles between prophase and anaphase and to the midbody during cytokinesis.78 Candidate mitotic substrates include the kinetochore motor protein CENP-E and topoisomerase IIa suggesting potential targets for the ERK pathway in the modulation of chromatin reorganization events during mitosis and in other phases of the cell cycle.77,78

The role of RAS in the molecular pathophysiology of myeloid leukemias has considerable potential implications for a therapeutic approach, which targets the RAS-to-MAPK signaling pathway.5,42-45 Although leukemogenesis is a multistep process, the positioning of several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes on this pathway strongly suggests that inhibition of oncogenic RAS function and signaling is a promising pharmacologic strategy.5,42-45 Therefore, we evaluated a panel of 9 inhibitors of RAS-to-MAPK signaling for growth inhibition of myeloid leukemia cell lines. This panel included inhibitors of the posttranslational modification of RAS and specific MEK inhibitors.5,42-45 Most FTIs were less effective in the inhibition of leukemia cell growth (eg B581, FPT-2, Cys-4-Abs-Met).

Treatment with the CAAX-based FTI-277 resulted in a significant reduction in cell viability and colony formation in all myeloid leukemia cell lines tested. Unfortunately, at concentrations greater than 20 µM this inhibitor also displayed a strong toxicity toward purified human CD34+ cells suggesting that myelotoxicity may be a side effect of treatment with some FTIs. Similar toxicities have not been reported in recent animal studies with this inhibitor.79-81 However, mild myelosuppression, neutropenia, and anemia have been observed in phase I clinical trials of another FTI, R115777.45,82 Treatment of myeloid cell lines with FTI-277 resulted in a G2/M block and a subsequent increase in the number of PP-MEK-1/2+ cells. Similarly, FTI-277 treatment of lung adenocarcinoma A-549 cells caused enrichment in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle.83

Additionally, L-739749 and L-744832, both CAAX-based FTIs, have recently been shown to inhibit spontaneous JMML granulocyte-macrophage colony growth (at 1-10 µM).84,85 Unfortunately, these inhibitors were not tested for toxicity toward normal purified stem cells. L-744832 inhibited H-RAS prenylation and colony growth of NF-1-deficient hematopoietic cells in response to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor but did not reduce constitutively activated MAPK activity in these cells. Furthermore, a myeloproliferative disorder in NF-1 deficient (NF-/-) mice did not respond to L-744832 treatment.85 It was speculated that the lack of efficacy in this model was due to the resistance of N-RAS and K-RAS processing to inhibition by this FTI.85

The FPP-based FTI, FPT-3, caused inhibition of colony formation of 10 of 19 myeloid cell lines at concentrations that did not significantly affect colony growth of purified human CD34+ cells. FPT-3 incubation of NB-4 cells resulted in rapid induction of apoptotic DNA fragmentation and exposure of phosphatidylserine. FPT-3 also induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by up-regulation of Bax and Bcl-xs expression and activation of caspase family proteases.86,87

Treatment with MEK inhibitors PD098059 and U0126 significantly inhibited viability, growth, and colony formation of most cell lines tested (10 of 19 and 19 of 19, respectively). MEK inhibitors, which display broad inhibitory effects, caused only minor toxicity in purified human CD34+ cells. The stronger effect of U0126 is most likely due to a higher affinity of U0126 to all forms of MEK (44- to 357-fold) as compared to PD098059.5 In contrast to PD098059, U0126 reverses Ki-RAS-mediated transformation by blocking MAPK and p70 S6 kinase pathways.88

In agreement with previous observations,82 a correlation between susceptibility toward these inhibitors and the RAS status (eg, mutation or activation) was not always observed in our study. For example, NB4 cells displayed strong activation of the RAS-to-MAPK cascade and profound inhibitory effects of most inhibitors, whereas Mono-Mac-1 cells were resistant to most inhibitors despite a strong MAPK activation.

The different cellular responses invoked by FPT-3, U0126, and FTI-277 suggest the possibility of different mechanisms of action. The differences between FPT-3 and FTI-277 are particularly interesting because these compounds target RAS farnesylation. It has been suggested that RAS may not be the therapeutically relevant loci.82 Determining whether leukemic growth inhibition occurs because of inhibition of RAS-specific cellular events such as MAPK-induced cell-cycle progression or because of alteration of other cellular targets such as RhoB, an endosomal Rho protein that functions in receptor trafficking, is currently under investigation. Regardless of the locus of action, our results demonstrate profound in vitro inhibitory effects of FTase, PPMTase, and MEK inhibitors on the growth of several myeloid leukemia cell lines irrespective of the presence of RAS mutations, expression of BCR-Abl, or MAPK activation. Our findings support a potential role of inhibitors of RAS signaling in the future treatment of myeloid leukemias.


    Acknowledgments

We thank Natalja Möbius and Dieter Kirchner for excellent technical assistance and Dr Kristine A. Henningfeld for valuable discussions. Purified human CD34+ stem cells were a gift from Dr Wiesneth, German Red Cross (DRK), Blutspendezentrale Baden-Württemberg, Ulm, Germany.


    Footnotes

Supported by a grant to C.W.M.R. from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Re 864/4-1) and a grant from the University of Ulm (P.541).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Christoph W. M. Reuter, Department of Hematology & Oncology, Center for Internal Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany; e-mail: reuter.christoph{at}mh-hannover.de.


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Bos JL. RAS oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4682-4689[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2. Clark GJ, Der CJ. Ras proto-oncogene activation in human malignancy. In: Garrett CT,Sell S, eds. Cellular Cancer Markers. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1995:17-52.

3. Reuther GW, Der CJ. The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:157-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

4. Rebollo A, Martinez CA. Ras proteins: recent advances and new functions. Blood. 1999;94:2971-2980[Free Full Text].

5. Reuter CWM, Morgan MA, Bergmann L. Targeting the Ras signaling pathway: a rational, mechanism-based treatment for hematological malignancies. Blood. 2000;96:1655-1669[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Zhang FL, Casey PJ. Protein prenylation: molecular mechanisms and functional consequences. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:241-269[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

7. Gelb MH. Protein prenylation, et cetera: signal transduction in two dimensions. Science. 1997;275:1750-1751[Free Full Text].

8. Mumby SM. Reversible palmitoylation of signaling proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:148-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

9. Wittinghofer A. Signal transduction via Ras. Biol Chem. 1998;379:933-937.

10. Marshall CJ. Ras effectors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:197-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

11. Katz ME, McCormick F. Signal transduction from multiple Ras effectors. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997;7:75-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

12. Feig LA, Urano T, Cantor S. Evidence for a Ras/Ral signaling cascade. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21:438-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

13. Carpenter CL, Cantley LC. Phosphoinositide kinases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:153-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

14. Daum G, Eisenmann-Tappe I, Fries HW, Troppmair J, Rapp U. The ins and outs of Raf kinases. Trends Biol Sci. 1994;19:474-480.

15. Marshall CJ. Raf gets it together. Nature. 1996;383:127-128[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

16. Porter AC, Vaillancourt RR. Tyrosine kinase receptor-activated signal transduction pathways which lead to oncogenesis. Oncogene. 1998;17:13434-13452.

17. Pawson T, Saxton TM. Signaling networks---do all roads lead to the same genes. Cell. 1999;97:675-678[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

18. Robinson MJ, Cobb MH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:180-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

19. Garrington TP, Johnson GL. Organization and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999;11:211-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

20. Treisman R. Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:205-215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

21. Sawyers CL, Denny CT. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: tel-a-kinase what ets all about. Cell. 1994;77:171-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

22. Byrne JL, Marshall CJ. The molecular pathophysiology of myeloid leukaemias: Ras revisited. Br J Haematol. 1998;100:256-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

23. Beaupre DM, Kurzrock R. RAS and leukemia: from basic mechanisms to gene-directed therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1071-1079[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24. Lin SR, Tsai JH, Yang YC, Lee SC. Mutations of K-Ras oncogene in human adrenal tumors in Taiwan. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:1060-1065[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

25. Lin SR, Hsu CH, Tsai JH, Wang JY, Hsieh TJ, Wu CH. Decreased GTPase activity of K-Ras deriving from human functional adrenocortical tumours. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1035-1040[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

26. Sprang SR. G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis. Ann Rev Biochem. 1997;66:639-678[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

27. Tobal K, Pagliuca A, Bhatt B, Bailey N, Layton DM, Mufti GJ. Mutation of the human FMS gene (M-CSF receptor) in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 1990;4:486-489[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

28. Kitayama H, Kanakura Y, Furitsu T, et al. Constitutively activating mutations of c-Kit receptor tyrosine kinase confer factor-independent growth and tumorigenicity of factor-dependent hematopoietic cell lines. Blood. 1995;85:790-798[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29. Nakata Y, Kimura A, Katoh O, et al. c-kit point mutation of extracellular domain in patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Br J Haematol. 1995;91:661-663[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

30. Kiyoi H, Naoe T, Nakano Y, et al. Prognostic implication of FLT3 and N-Ras gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1999;93:3074-3080[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31. Dosil M, Wang S, Lemischka IR. Mitogenic signaling and substrate specificity of the Flk2/Flt3 receptor tyrosine kinase in fibroblasts and interleukin 3-dependent hematopoietic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:6572-6585[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32. Golub T, Barker G, Lovett M, Gilliland D. Fusion of PDGF receptor (to a novel ets-like gene, tel, in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with t(5;12) chromosomal translocation. Cell. 1994;77:307-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

33. Jousset C, Carron C, Boureux A, et al. A domain of TEL conserved in a subset of ETS proteins defines a specific oligomerization interface essential to the mitogenic properties of the TEL-PDGFRbeta oncoprotein. EMBO J. 1997;16:69-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

34. Papadopoulos P, Raidge SA, Boucher CA, Stocking C, Wiedemann LM. The novel activation of abl by fusion to an ets-related gene, tel. Cancer Res. 1995;55:34-38[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35. Golub TR, Goga A, Barker GF, et al. Oligomerization of the ABL tyrosine kinase by the Ets protein TEL in human leukemia. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4107-4116[Abstract].

36. Zou X, Calame K. Signaling pathways activated by oncogenic forms of Abl tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:18141-18144[Free Full Text].

37. Voss J, Posern G, Hannemann JR, et al. The leukaemic oncoproteins BCR-Abl and Tel-Abl (ETV6/Abl) have altered substrate preferences and activate similar intracellular signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2000;19:1684-1690[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

38. DeClue JE, Papageorge AG, Fletcher JA, et al. Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis. Cell. 1992;69:265-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

39. Kalra R, Paderanga DC, Olson K, Shannon KM. Genetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that NF-1 limits myeloid cell growth through p21ras. Blood. 1994;84:3435-3439[Abstract/Free Full Text].

40. Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, et al. Loss of NF-1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in hematopoietic cells. Nat Genet. 1996;12:144-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

41. Largaespada DA, Brannan CI, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. NF-1 deficiency causes Ras-mediated granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor hypersensitivity and chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 1996;12:137-143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

42. Omer CA, Kohl NE. CA1A2X-competitive inhibitors of farnesyltransferase as anti-cancer agents. TIBS. 1997;18:437-444.

43. Gibbs JB, Oliff A. The potential of farnesyltransferase inhibitors as cancer chemotherapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:143-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

44. Heimbrook DC, Oliff A. Therapeutic intervention and signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:284-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

45. Zujewski J, Horak ID, Bol CJ, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:927-941[Abstract/Free Full Text].

46. Adjei AA, Erlichman C, Davis JN, et al. A phase I trial of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336: evidence for biological and clinical activity. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1871-1877[Abstract/Free Full Text].

47. Reuter C, Auf der Landwehr U I, Auf der Landwehr U II, et al. Modulation of intracellular metabolism of cytosine arabinoside in acute myeloid leukemia by granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor. Leukemia. 1994;8:217-225[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

48. Reuter CWM, Catling AD, Weber MJ. Immune complex kinase assays for mitogen-activated protein kinase and MEK. Methods Enzymol. 1995;205:245-256.

49. Reuter CWM, Catling AD, Jelinek T, Weber MJ. Biochemical analysis of MEK activation in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:7644-7655[Abstract/Free Full Text].

50. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

51. Taylor JT, Shalloway D. Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras. Curr Biol. 1996;6:1621-1627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

52. De Rooij J, Bos JL. Minimal Ras-binding domain of Raf1 can be used as an activation-specific probe for Ras. Oncogene. 1997;14:623-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

53. Hirsch-Ginsberg C, LeMaistre AC, Kantarjian H, et al. Ras mutations are rare events in Philadelphia chromosome-negative/bcr gene rearrangement-negative chronic myelogenous leukemia, but are prevalent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 1990;76:1214-1219[Abstract/Free Full Text].

54. Mortazavi Y, Tooze JA, Gordon-Smith EC, Rutherford TR. N-RAS gene mutation in patients with aplastic anemia and aplastic anemia/paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria during evolution to clonal disease. Blood. 2000;95:646-650[Abstract/Free Full Text].

55. Lubbert M, Mertelsmann R, Herrmann F. Detection of allele-specific expression of N-Ras oncogenes in human leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 1992;81:370-373[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

56. MacKencie KL, Dolnikov A, Millington M, Shounan Y, Symonds G. Mutant N-ras induces myeloproliferative disorders and apoptosis in bone marrow repopulated mice. Blood. 1999;93:2043-2056[Abstract/Free Full Text].

57. Towatari M, Iida H, Tanimoto M, Iwata H, Hamaguchi M, Saito H. Constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in acute leukemia cells. Leukemia. 1997;11:479-484[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

58. Iida M, Towatari M, Nakao A, et al. Lack of constitutive activation of MAP kinase pathway in human acute myeloid leukemia cells with N-Ras mutation. Leukemia 1999;13:585-589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

59. Kim SC, Hahn JS, Min YH, Yoo NC, Ko YW, Lee WJ. Constitutive activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in human acute leukemias: combined role of activation of MEK, hyperexpression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and downregulation of a phosphatase, PAC1. Blood. 1999;93:3893-3899[Abstract/Free Full Text].

60. Chen TH, Sarnecki C, Blenis J. Nuclear localization and regulation of ERK- and RSK-encoded protein kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:915-927[Abstract/Free Full Text].

61. Gonzalez FA, Seth A, Raden DL, Bowman DS, Fay FS, Davis RJ. Serum-induced translocation of mitogen-activated protein kinase to the cell surface ruffling membrane and the nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1993;122:1089-1101[Abstract/Free Full Text].

62. Lenormand P, Sardet G, Pagès G, L'Allemain G, Brunet A, Pouysségur J. Growth factors induce nuclear translocation of MAP kinases (p42mapk and p44mapk) but not of their activator MAP kinase kinase (p45mapkk) in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993;122:1079-1089[Abstract/Free Full Text].

63. Fukuda M, Gotoh Y, Nishida E. Interaction of MAP kinase with MAP kinase kinase: its possible role in the control of nucleocytoplasmatic transport of MAP kinase. EMBO J. 1997;16:1901-1908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

64. Jaaro H, Rudinfeld H, Hanoch T, Seger R. Nuclear translocation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK1) in response to mitogenic stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3742-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text].

65. Lenormand P, Brondello J-M, Brunet A, Pouysségur J. Growth factor-induced p42/p44 MAPK nuclear translocation and retention requires both MAPK activation and neosynthesis of nuclear anchoring proteins. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:625-633[Abstract/Free Full Text].

66. Khokhlatchev AV, Canagarajah B, Wilsbacher J, et al. Phosphorylation of the MAP kinase ERK2 promotes its homodimerization and nuclear translocation. Cell. 1998;93:605-615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

67. Tolwinski NS, Shapiro PS, Goueli S, Ahn NG. Nuclear localization of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MKK1) is promoted by serum stimulation and G2/M progression. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:6168-6174[Abstract/Free Full Text].

68. Adachi M, Fukuda M, Nishida E. Two co-existing mechanisms for nuclear import of MAP kinase: passive diffusion of a monomer and active transport of a dimer. EMBO J. 1999;19:5347-5358[CrossRef].

69. Brunet A, Roux D, Lenormand P, Dowd S, Keyse S, Pouysségur J. Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry. EMBO J. 1999;18:664-674[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

70. Hulleman E, Bijvelt JJ, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT, Boonstra J. Nuclear translocation of mitogen-activated protein kinase p42MAPK during ongoing cell cycle. J Cell Physiol. 1999;180:325-333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

71. Taylor SJ, Shalloway D. Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras. Curr Biol. 1996;6:1621-1627.

72. Dobrowolski S, Harter M, Stacey DW. Cellular Ras activity is required for passage through multiple points of the G0-G1 phase in BALB-c3T3 cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:5441-5449[Abstract/Free Full Text].

73. Liu J-J, Chao J-R, Jiang M-C, Ng S-Y, Yen JJ-Y, Jang-Yen H-F. Ras transformation results in an elevated level of cyclin D1 and acceleration of G1 progression in NIH3T3 cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:3654-3663[Abstract].

74. Winston JT, Coats SR, Wang Y-Z, Pledger WJ. Regulation of the cell cycle machinery by oncogenic ras. Oncogene. 1996;12:127-134[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

75. Shapiro PS, Vaisberg E, Hunt AJ, et al. Activation of the MKK/ERK pathway during somatic cell mitosis: direct interactions of active ERK with kinetochores and regulation of the mitotic 3T3/2 phosphoantigen. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1533-1545[Abstract/Free Full Text].

76. Chiri S, Nadai CD, Ciapa B. Evidence for MAP kinase activation during mitotic division. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:2519-2527[Abstract].

77. Zecevic M, Catling AD, Eblen ST, et al. Active MAP kinase in mitosis: localization at kinetochores and association with the motor protein CENP-E. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1547-1558[Abstract/Free Full Text].

78. Shapiro PS, Whalen AM, Tolwinski NS, et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase activates topoisomerase IIa through a mechanism independent of phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:3551-3560[Abstract/Free Full Text].

79. Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Ras CAAX peptidomimetic FTI-276 selectively blocks tumor growth in nude mice of a human lung carcinoma with K-Ras mutation and p53 deletion. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4243-4247[Abstract/Free Full Text].

80. Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Both farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors are required for inhibition of oncogenic K-Ras prenylation but each alone is sufficient to suppress human tumor growth in nude mouse xenografts. Oncogene. 1998;16:1467-1473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

81. Lantry LE, Zhang Z, Yao R, et al. Effect of farnesyltransferase inhibitor FTI-276 on established lung adenomas from A/J mice induced by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:113-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].

82. Prendergast GC. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: antineoplastic mechanism and clinical prospects. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:166-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

83. Miquel K, Pradines A, Sun J, et al. GGTI-298 induces G0-G1 block and apoptosis whereas FTI-277 causes G2-M enrichment in A549 cells. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1846-1850[Abstract/Free Full Text].

84. Emanuel PD, Snyder RC, Wiley T, Gopurala B, Castleberry RP. Inhibition of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia cell growth in vitro by farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Blood. 2000;95:639-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].

85. Mahgoub N, Taylor BR, Gratiot M, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of a farnesyltransferase inhibitor on NF-1-deficient hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1999;94:2469-2476[Abstract/Free Full Text].

86. Hung WC, Chuang LY. Involvement of caspase family proteases in FPT inhibitor III-induced apoptosis in human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1998;12:1339-1342[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

87. Hung WC, Chuang LY. The farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FPT inhibitor III upregulates Bax and Bcl-xs expression and induces apoptosis in human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1998;12:137-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

88. Fukazawa H, Uehara Y. U0126 reverses Ki-ras-mediated transformation by blocking both mitogen-activated protein kinase and p70 S6 kinase pathways. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2104-2107[Abstract/Free Full Text].

© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
C. R. Geest, M. Buitenhuis, M. J. A. Groot Koerkamp, F. C. P. Holstege, E. Vellenga, and P. J. Coffer
Tight control of MEK-ERK activation is essential in regulating proliferation, survival, and cytokine production of CD34+-derived neutrophil progenitors
Blood, October 15, 2009; 114(16): 3402 - 3412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. R. Geest and P. J. Coffer
MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of hematopoiesis
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2009; 86(2): 237 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Zhang and R. P. Hill
Hypoxia Enhances Metastatic Efficiency in HT1080 Fibrosarcoma Cells by Increasing Cell Survival in Lungs, Not Cell Adhesion and Invasion
Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7789 - 7797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Raponi, J.-L. Harousseau, J. E. Lancet, B. Lowenberg, R. Stone, Y. Zhang, W. Rackoff, Y. Wang, and D. Atkins
Identification of Molecular Predictors of Response in a Study of Tipifarnib Treatment in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 2254 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. M. Kornblau, M. Womble, Y. H. Qiu, C. E. Jackson, W. Chen, M. Konopleva, E. H. Estey, and M. Andreeff
Simultaneous activation of multiple signal transduction pathways confers poor prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia
Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2358 - 2365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Frohling, C. Scholl, D. G. Gilliland, and R. L. Levine
Genetics of Myeloid Malignancies: Pathogenetic and Clinical Implications
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2005; 23(26): 6285 - 6295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. E. Martin, T. B. Brunner, K. D. Kiel, T. F. DeLaney, W. F. Regine, M. Mohiuddin, E. F. Rosato, D. G. Haller, J. P. Stevenson, D. Smith, et al.
A Phase I Trial of the Dual Farnesyltransferase and Geranylgeranyltransferase Inhibitor L-778,123 and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5447 - 5454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Ajenjo, E. Canon, I. Sanchez-Perez, D. Matallanas, J. Leon, R. Perona, and P. Crespo
Subcellular Localization Determines the Protective Effects of Activated ERK2 against Distinct Apoptogenic Stimuli in Myeloid Leukemia Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32813 - 32823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Chu, M. Holtz, M. Gupta, and R. Bhatia
BCR/ABL kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate enhances MAP kinase activity in chronic myelogenous leukemia CD34+ cells
Blood, April 15, 2004; 103(8): 3167 - 3174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. C. Gustafson, S. Ray, L. Jamieson, E. A. Thompson, A. R. Brasier, and A. P. Fields
Bcr-Abl Regulates Protein Kinase C{iota} (PKC{iota}) Transcription via an Elk1 Site in the PKC{iota} Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9400 - 9408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. E. Lancet and J. E. Karp
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors in hematologic malignancies: new horizons in therapy
Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 3880 - 3889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Selleri, J. P. Maciejewski, N. Montuori, P. Ricci, V. Visconte, B. Serio, L. Luciano, and B. Rotoli
Involvement of nitric oxide in farnesyltransferase inhibitor-mediated apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia cells
Blood, August 15, 2003; 102(4): 1490 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Zheng, P. Fiumara, Y. V. Li, G. Georgakis, V. Snell, M. Younes, J. N. Vauthey, A. Carbone, and A. Younes
MEK/ERK pathway is aberrantly active in Hodgkin disease: a signaling pathway shared by CD30, CD40, and RANK that regulates cell proliferation and survival
Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 1019 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. C. Platanias
Map kinase signaling pathways and hematologic malignancies
Blood, June 15, 2003; 101(12): 4667 - 4679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Ravandi, M. Talpaz, and Z. Estrov
Modulation of Cellular Signaling Pathways: Prospects for Targeted Therapy in Hematological Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 535 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
J. V. Melo, T. P. Hughes, and J. F. Apperley
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 132 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Boldt, U. H. Weidle, and W. Kolch
The role of MAPK pathways in the action of chemotherapeutic drugs
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1831 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. W. H. Yee, A. M. O'Farrell, B. D. Smolich, J. M. Cherrington, G. McMahon, C. L. Wait, L. S. McGreevey, D. J. Griffith, and M. C. Heinrich
SU5416 and SU5614 inhibit kinase activity of wild-type and mutant FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase
Blood, September 26, 2002; 100(8): 2941 - 2949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Hahn, E. J. Bernhard, W. Regine, M. Mohiuddin, D. G. Haller, J. P. Stevenson, D. Smith, B. Pramanik, J. Tepper, T. F. DeLaney, et al.
A Phase I Trial of the Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor L-778,123 and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung and Head and Neck Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1065 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. F. Dorsey, J. M. Cunnick, S. M. Mane, and J. Wu
Regulation of the Erk2-Elk1 signaling pathway and megakaryocytic differentiation of Bcr-Abl+ K562 leukemic cells by Gab2
Blood, February 15, 2002; 99(4): 1388 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Yu, G. Krystal, L. Varticovksi, R. McKinstry, M. Rahmani, P. Dent, and S. Grant
Pharmacologic Mitogen-activated Protein/Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Kinase/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Inhibitors Interact Synergistically with STI571 to Induce Apoptosis in Bcr/Abl-expressing Human Leukemia Cells
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(1): 188 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
B. A. Ballif and J. Blenis
Molecular Mechanisms Mediating Mammalian Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Kinase (MEK)-MAPK Cell Survival Signals
Cell Growth Differ., August 1, 2001; 12(8): 397 - 408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, C. W. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Signal Transduction
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020