Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauchen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauchen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 15 March 2001, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1898-1898

CORRESPONDENCE

To the editor:

Criteria for the diagnosis of acute megakaryocytic leukemia

The recent report by Tallman et al1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's experience with acute megakaryocytic leukemia contains an apparent inconsistency. In the methods section it is stated that the "bone marrow aspirate or biopsy leukemic blast cell population must have represented 30% or more of the myeloid marrow."1(p2406) This widely accepted French-American-British (FAB) criterion for the diagnosis of acute granulocytic leukemia, however, does not appear to have been met by several of the patients listed in Table 1. Patients 2, 12, and 14 are reported as having only 10%, 5%, and 15% marrow blasts, respectively, and in an additional 3 patients (10, 11, and 13) marrow blasts are reported as "NA." How was the diagnosis established in these patients?


James A. Strauchen
Department of Pathology Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, New York

Reference

1. Tallman MS, Neuberg D, Bennett JM, et al. Acute megakaryocytic leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Blood. 2000;96:2405-2411[Abstract/Free Full Text].



Response:

Diagnosis of acute megakaryocytic leukemia

We appreciate the comment from Dr Strauchen, since a strict interpretation of the percent blasts being less than 30% for the 6 patients he mentions is correct. But in all of these cases, there was a significant percentage of circulating blasts, ranging from 7% to 63%, and there was considerable marrow fibrosis that prevented doing a precise marrow blast count. In case 12, the high platelet count, severe marrow fibrosis, and dysplastic megakaryocytes permitted the diagnosis to be established.1 An additional reference that provides more insight into the diagnosis of the acute myeloid leukemia is Cheson et al.2


Martin S. Tallman
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Northwestern University Medical School Chicago, Illinois

John M. Bennett
University of Rochester Cancer Center Rochester, New York

References

1. Tallman MS, Neuberg D, Bennett JM, et al. Acute megakaryocytic leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Blood. 2000;96:2405-2411.

2. Cheson BD, Cassileth PA, et al. Report of the NCI Sponsored Workshop on the Definitions of Diagnosis and Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:813-819[Abstract].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Matarrese, L. Gambardella, A. Cassone, S. Vella, R. Cauda, and W. Malorni
Mitochondrial Membrane Hyperpolarization Hijacks Activated T Lymphocytes Toward the Apoptotic-Prone Phenotype: Homeostatic Mechanisms of HIV Protease Inhibitors
J. Immunol., June 15, 2003; 170(12): 6006 - 6015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Lu and J.-M. Andrieu
In Vitro Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication by Autologous CD8+ T Cells Expanded with Inactivated-Virus-Pulsed Dendritic Cells
J. Virol., October 1, 2001; 75(19): 8949 - 8956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauchen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauchen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020