| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
NEOPLASIA
From the Divisions of Functional Genomics, Hematology,
Cardiology, and Molecular Immunology, Jichi Medical School,
Kawachi-gun, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hematology, Dokkyo
University School of Medicine, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan; and Tochigi Cancer
Center, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a slowly progressing hematologic
malignancy associated with a poor outcome. Despite the relatively high
incidence of MDS in the elderly, differentiation of MDS from de novo
acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still remains problematic. Identification
of genes expressed in an MDS-specific manner would allow the molecular
diagnosis of MDS. Toward this goal, AC133 surface marker-positive
hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-like fractions have been collected from a
variety of leukemias in a large-scale and long-term genomics project,
referred to as "Blast Bank," and transcriptome of these purified
blasts from the patients with MDS were then compared with those from
AML through the use of oligonucleotide microarrays. A number of genes
were shown to be expressed in a disease-specific manner either to MDS
or AML. Among the former found was the gene encoding the protein
Delta-like (Dlk) that is distantly related to the Delta-Notch family of
signaling proteins. Because overexpression of Dlk may play a role in
the pathogenesis of MDS, the disease specificity of Dlk expression was
tested by a quantitative "real-time" polymerase chain reaction analysis. Examination of the Blast Bank samples from 22 patients with MDS, 31 with AML, and 8 with chronic myeloid leukemia
confirmed the highly selective expression of the Dlk gene
in the individuals with MDS. Dlk could be the first candidate molecule
to differentiate MDS from AML. The proposal is made that microarray
analysis with the Blast Bank samples is an efficient approach to
extract transcriptome data of clinical relevance for a wide range of
hematologic disorders.
(Blood. 2001;98:422-427) Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a slowly
progressing leukemic disorder that predominantly affects elderly
people.1,2 Individuals with MDS exhibit cytopenia in at
least one lineage of peripheral blood (PB) cells. However, the bone
marrow (BM) of many affected individuals is hyper- to normocellular,
suggesting the presence of ineffective hematopoiesis. Another
characteristic feature of MDS is the dysplasia of at least one lineage
(myeloid, erythroid, or megakaryocyte-platelet lineage) of BM cells,
such as neutrophils with pseudo-Pelger anomaly, hypersegmented
neutrophils, ringed sideroblasts, and
micromegakaryocytes.3
The clinical course of MDS can be divided into several phases. Patients
in the indolent, chronic phase exhibit a decrease in the number of PB
cells and are diagnosed with either refractory anemia (RA) or RA with
ringed sideroblasts (RARS). Individuals with dysplastic change in BM
and monocytosis in PB are diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic
leukemia (CMMoL). After a variable interval, however, some individuals
with MDS undergo a progressive transformation to overt leukemia. As the
number of blast cells increases, the patients are diagnosed with RA
with an excess of blasts (RAEB; 5%-19% blasts in BM), RAEB in
transformation (RAEB-t; 20%-29% blasts in BM), and, finally,
MDS-associated acute leukemia (> 20% blasts in BM).
MDS-associated leukemia is rarely cured by conventional chemotherapy.
Intensive treatment with anticancer drugs often results in prolonged
myelosuppression, which is one of the main causes of disease-related
death.4 Individuals with acute leukemia that results from
MDS therefore have a poor prognosis, which contrasts with the
somewhat better outcome of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
in this older group of patients. It is thus essential to differentiate
MDS-associated leukemia from de novo AML to select the optimal
therapeutic strategy.
This task is complicated, however, by the fact that some patients with
de novo AML may exhibit dysplastic changes in BM during the course of
their disease.5-7 It is thus extremely difficult to
diagnose elderly individuals with overt leukemia if their BM exhibits
dysplasia. The occurrence of a period of cytopenia before the
development of leukemia indicates that the patient should be treated
for MDS-associated leukemia. Without the clinical history, however,
there are currently few other criteria with which to differentiate
MDS-associated leukemia from de novo AML with dysplasia. The
identification of genes that are expressed specifically in MDS blasts
should facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of elderly people with
overt leukemia, as well as clarify whether AML with dysplastic changes
is truly a clinical entity distinct from MDS-associated leukemia.
The development of DNA microarrays or DNA chips has revolutionized the
analysis of gene expression profiles. Such DNA microarrays can contain
tens of thousands of test complementary DNAs (cDNAs) or
oligonucleotides and, with a single hybridization step, allow a
systematic comparison of the expression of the corresponding genes
between 2 given samples.8 The completion of the human genome sequencing project will increase further the analytical power of
this technology. The use of DNA microarrays has already allowed the
identification of candidate mammalian genes related to carcinogenesis
or cell differentiation.9-11
The DNA microarray technique is so powerful, however, that it yields
"pseudopositive" results in many instances. For example, for the
identification of genes whose expression is specifically induced or
inhibited in cancer cells, a simple comparison of gene expression
profiles between cancerous and normal tissues with the use of a DNA
microarray is not a good approach. Normal tissue is composed of many
cell types, which include both tissue-specific cells as well as cells
that contribute to nonspecific components such as the circulatory
system. In contrast, although cancerous tissue also comprises a variety
of cell types, a particular cell type (the cancer cell) becomes
predominant. The ratio of the various cell types thus significantly
differs between normal and cancerous tissues. If, in the example shown
in Figure 1A, the cancer has arisen from
the green cell type, then the proportion of the other cell types
becomes reduced in the cancerous tissue compared with that in the
normal tissue. Furthermore, although the messenger RNA (mRNA) copy
number per cell of genes expressed in these other cell types may not
differ between cancerous and normal tissues, a comparison of the 2 tissues en bloc would incorrectly suggest that the expression of these
genes is decreased in the cancer. Conversely, because of the expansion
of the green cell population, such a comparison would suggest
incorrectly that genes expressed in the cancer cells whose mRNA copy
number is not affected by transformation are activated in the cancer
tissue. It would not be an easy task to differentiate these
pseudopositive genes from genes whose expression level is truly
affected by carcinogenesis.
It is therefore important to develop new means of sample preparation or
data normalization for DNA microarray experiments that will facilitate
the identification of changes in gene expression that are of biologic
relevance. Ideally, populations of cells with the same phenotype and
background (cell origin, differentiation state, expression of surface
markers), differing only in that one population is transformed and the
other is not, should be purified from the cancerous and normal
tissues before microarray analysis (Figure 1B). Any differences in the
gene expression profiles between the 2 cell populations would thus
likely be related to carcinogenesis. We propose that such an
approach be termed BAMP (background-matched population) screening
or comparison, and we have now applied this technique to identify genes
useful for the diagnosis of MDS.
AC133,12 also known as PROML1,13 was recently
identified as a cell surface protein whose expression is restricted to
a blood cell population highly enriched in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and to the retina. AC133 is expressed in a population of CD34high, CD38low, c-Kit+ blood
cells, which is known to contain the HSCs,14 and this protein is thus one of the most specific markers for HSCs currently available.
We set out to purify and store AC133+ blastic cells from a
variety of leukemia patients as a part of our large-scale and long-term genomics project, referred to as "Blast Bank," to characterize leukemia-specific gene expression. The samples in the Blast Bank should
all be at virtually identical stages of differentiation and show
similar profiles of surface-marker expression, irrespective of their
specific leukemic origin. In the present study, we have compared the
gene expression profiles of cells in the Blast Bank derived from the
individuals with MDS or de novo AML. Our results indicate that several
genes are preferentially expressed in MDS, and they should facilitate
the development of tools for the molecular diagnosis of this condition.
Preparation of Blast Bank samples
RNA preparation and DNA microarray analysis
Real-time polymerase chain reaction Portions of the unamplified cDNAs were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with SYBR Green PCR Core Reagents (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The incorporation of the SYBR Green dye into the PCR products was monitored in real time with an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (PE Applied Biosystems), resulting in the calculation of threshold cycle, or CT value, that defines the PCR cycle number at which an exponential growth of PCR product begins. The CT values for -actin and Dlk were used to
calculate the abundance of Dlk transcripts relative to that of
-actin mRNA. The oligonucleotide primers for PCR were
5'-CCATCATGAAGTGTGACGTGG-3' and 5'-GTCCGCCTAGAAGCATTTGCG-3' for
-actin cDNA, and 5'-CTGAAGGTGTCCATGAAAGAG-3' and
5'-GCTGAAGGTGGTCATGTCGAT-3' for Dlk cDNA.
MNC screening and BAMP screening Isolation of AC133+ cells from MNCs of leukemia patients by labeling with microbead-conjugated antibodies to (anti-) AC133 and chromatography on a magnetic cell separation column yielded a highly pure cell population (> 95% AC133+ cells in most instances). These cells were constantly c-Kithigh, CD45high, and CD16 (data not shown), being
compatible with the previous characterization of AC133+
cells. However, expression level of CD38 varied from sample to sample
(from very low to moderately high) among different patients. It is,
therefore, possible that the AC133+ fraction has still
heterogeneity to some extent, which may have a relationship with the
nature of diseases.
To date, we have collected 166 Blast Bank samples that contain 8 cases of healthy volunteers, 32 cases of AML, 10 cases of acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), 42 cases of MDS (including MDS-associated leukemia), 25 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 13 cases of aplastic anemia, and 36 cases of other diseases. Most previous studies of gene expression analysis in leukemia cells were performed with MNCs prepared from PB or BM. It was therefore important to determine the extent to which the results obtained with BAMP screening differ from those obtained with MNC screening. To address this issue, we applied both screening approaches to the samples from the same pair of individuals and compared the resulting gene expression profiles (Figure 1B). We first purified AC133+ cells from the MNCs of PB from
healthy volunteers. Flow cytometry revealed that the MNCs and
AC133+ cells comprised 7.6% and 80.5% CD34+
cells, respectively (Figure 2A). We next
purified AC133+ cells from the MNCs of a patient with
MDS-associated leukemia (ID no. 7); flow cytometry revealed that the
MNCs and AC133+ cells comprised 66.2% and 99.1%
CD34+ cells, respectively (Figure 2B). In both instances,
the AC133-based purification step yielded homogeneous mid-sized cells
with a high ratio of nucleus to cytoplasm, although the
AC133+ cells from the MDS patient exhibited unusual
lobulated nuclei (Figure 2A,B).
RNA was purified from the MNCs and AC133+ cells and was used to generate Cy5 dye-labeled cDNA (red fluorescence) or Cy3-labeled cDNA (green fluorescence) for samples from the healthy volunteers or the MDS patient, respectively. The corresponding cDNA preparations from the normal controls and the MDS patient were mixed and exposed to a cDNA microarray containing fragments of 382 cancer-related genes (Figure 2C). The MNC comparison and the BAMP comparison revealed distinct differences in the transcriptome profiles between the healthy volunteers and the patient with MDS. Indeed, the mRNA abundance ratio (reflecting a difference in gene expression between healthy volunteers and the patient with MDS) for many spots displayed opposite patterns in the MNC and BAMP comparisons (shown numbered in Figure 2C). Screening of MNC indicated that expression of the CD34 gene, a marker for immature blood cells, was increased in the patient with MDS compared with that in healthy volunteers (Cy5 fluorescence intensity, 519 arbitrary units [U]; Cy3 fluorescence intensity, 42 323 U). However, BAMP screening showed that the CD34 gene is expressed at similar levels in the 2 AC133+ cell populations (Cy5 fluorescence intensity, 6 749 546 U; Cy3 fluorescence intensity, 5 543 512 U). The "pseudo" increase in CD34 gene expression apparent in the MNC screening therefore likely reflected the expansion of the CD34+ cell population, comprising mostly leukemic blasts, in the BM of the leukemic patient, not an increase in the CD34 mRNA copy number per cell. These results indicate that comparison of samples by BAMP screening provides distinct information from that obtained with MNC screening, and that the former approach is more suitable for extracting data of biologic relevance. BAMP comparison between MDS and AML blasts For the identification of MDS-specific genes, we prepared a custom-made microarray that contains oligonucleotides corresponding to 1152 human genes encoding membrane proteins, growth factors, and proteins involved in redox regulation. For our analysis, membrane proteins should be a target to be focused on because diagnosis by flow cytometry with antibodies to MDS-specific cell surface markers, if found, would be of great clinical value. We also chose, for the array, genes encoding proteins involved in redox regulation, because such molecules in addition to membrane proteins should play important roles in the acquisition of tolerance to chemotherapeutic reagents.Any oncogenic events within cells should exert their effect, at least, partially through the regulation of gene transcription. Therefore, to gain insights into the pathogenesis of leukemias, we also used a commercially available microarray (HO-3) containing oligonucleotides based on 1152 genes encoding mainly transcriptional factors. Expression profile for a total of 2304 genes was thus obtained for every Blast Bank sample. With these arrays, we have compared the transcriptome of leukemic
blasts between the individuals with MDS (3 patients with MDS-associated
leukemia and 2 patients with RAEB) and those with de novo AML (3 patients with subtype M1 and 2 patients with M4). The expression
profile of the genes spotted on the arrays was visualized by
construction of a "gene tree," or dendrogram, that clusters genes
with similar expression patterns (Figure
3A). Almost half the genes were
transcriptionally silent. Substantial diversity was apparent among the
patients, however, in the extent of expression for the
transcriptionally active genes. To identify disease-specific genes, we calculated the mean value for the expression intensity of
each gene for the MDS group and the AML group, and then generated a new
dendrogram based on these calculated values (Figure 3B). This
"average tree" revealed the presence of clusters of MDS-specific genes and of AML-specific genes.
The expression profiles of the MDS-specific genes are shown in greater detail in Figure 3C. Genes shown to be highly MDS-specific include those encoding Dlk,16 Tec,17 and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1.18 Dlk, also known as Pref-1 (preadipocyte factor-1),19 FA1 (fetal antigen 1),20 and SCP-1 (stromal cell protein-1; GenBank accession number, D16847), is a transmembrane protein belonging to the superfamily of epidermal growth factor-like proteins; it is also distantly related to the Delta-Serrate-Notch family of signaling molecules. The differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells into adipocytes is accompanied by a decrease in the abundance of Dlk mRNA, whereas forced expression of Dlk in these cells inhibits adipocyte differentiation. Dlk thus appears to contribute to the determination of cell fate or differentiation by mediating cell-to-cell contact, an ability shared by the Delta-Serrate-Notch family of membrane proteins.21 Tec is a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase that is activated in response to various growth stimuli.22 Although Tec is expressed in a wide spectrum of blood cells, its mRNA was especially abundant in MNCs from the BM of MDS patients.17 Our present data further support the disease-specific expression of this kinase. The AML-specific genes identified by the BAMP screening include those for member 123 and member 224 of solute carrier family 15, member 2 of solute carrier family 1,25 opioid receptor delta 1,26 and the leptin receptor27 (Figure 3D). The members of the solute carrier families of proteins transport small peptides across cell membranes in a proton-dependent manner, and, thus, they may play a role in determining drug sensitivity of blasts. The leptin receptor was previously shown to be expressed in MNCs from the BM of AML patients.28 The expression of Dlk may be important not only for the diagnosis of MDS, but also for the molecular pathogenesis of the disease. Dlk transcripts have been detected in stromal cell lines capable of supporting the proliferation of HSCs, but not in those that fail to maintain HSC growth.29 Moreover, forced expression of Dlk enabled the latter cells to support HSC proliferation, indicating that Dlk contributes directly to this ability. These observations thus suggest that Dlk might support hematopoiesis by mediating cell-to-cell contact between HSCs and stromal cells in the microenvironment of BM. Given the supposed role of Dlk in differentiation block, overexpression of this protein in HSCs might directly contribute to the increased proliferation of these cells, the unusual phenotypes of differentiated cells, and the ineffective hematopoiesis that is characteristic of individuals with MDS. Quantitation of Dlk gene expression by real-time PCR To confirm the preferential expression of the Dlk gene in MDS blasts, we prepared cDNAs from the Blast Bank samples of 22 patients with MDS, 31 with AML (all samples in the Blast Bank for both diseases at the timing of examination), and 8 with CML, and then subjected these cDNAs to "real-time" PCR analysis with primers specific for Dlk and -actin. The abundance of Dlk mRNA relative to
that of -actin mRNA in the blasts from most MDS patients was
markedly greater than that in the blasts from most AML patients (Figure
4). The number of individuals for which
the relative abundance of Dlk mRNA was more than twice that in the
healthy control was 12 of 22 (55%) for MDS patients and 3 (designated
a, b, and c) of 31 (10%) for AML patients (P < .0001).
Interestingly, prominent dysplasia was apparent for all 3 lineages of
BM cells from AML patient a and for 2 lineages of BM cells from patient
c. Moreover, the mature neutrophils of patient c exhibited
pseudo-Pelger anomaly, a hallmark of MDS. Therefore, despite the lack
of clinical history before diagnosis, it is likely that patients a and
c did not have de novo AML, but rather had undergone leukemic
transformation from an early stage of MDS. The presence of few mature
cells in the BM and PB of patient b (leukemic blasts constituted
> 98% of cells in both specimens) rendered it impossible to assess
blood cell dysplasia. Cytogenetic analysis failed to identify any
chromosomal anomaly in the BM cells of patient b. Inclusion of patients
a and c in the MDS group further enhances the potential of Dlk as a
molecular marker of MDS.
We did not detect Dlk mRNA in the individuals with CML, either in its
indolent chronic phase or terminal blast crisis. These negative data
were not attributable to a low quantity of or degradation of the sample
mRNAs, because the PCR product of
Our data indicate that purified cell subsets are more informative than are unfractionated cell populations for comparison of gene expression profiles by DNA microarray analysis. The cell fractionation protocol should be designed so that the characteristics of the samples for comparison, with the exception of the characteristic of interest (such as malignant transformation or drug resistance), are matched as closely as possible. The hematopoietic system is a good target for this BAMP screening approach. Hundreds of cell-surface antigens have been identified on blood cells, and flow cytometric analysis based on these markers is routinely and extensively performed in clinical hematology laboratories. It is thus possible to isolate almost any specific population of blood cells by flow cytometry with a combination of antibodies specific for such cell-surface markers. A similar approach can be applied to solid tumors with the use of laser-dissection microscopy. Combination of this technique with amplification methods for RNA should allow microarray analysis of the gene expression profile of any given cell type.30 However, whereas purification of specific cell types from fresh blood in numbers of 105 or 106 is relatively straightforward, collection of the same number of cells by laser-dissection microscopy is a much more demanding task. Furthermore, it is usually necessary to fix and stain specimens, procedures that may damage cellular mRNA, before laser-dissection microscopy. Populations of leukemic blasts usually contain immature, HSC-like cells as well as cells with committed phenotypes. The nature of the latter type of cells depends on the specific disease, and the difference in lineage commitment of these populations should thus contribute substantially to any differences in the transcriptomes detected in comparisons among leukemic blasts. In contrast, the immature, HSC-like subset of leukemic blasts that exhibits a CD34high, CD38low profile of surface antigen expression is common to many patients with different types of leukemia. We chose AC133 as the antigen on which to base our purification of such a disease-independent cell fraction. An AC133+ cell population can also be purified from healthy volunteers, thus allowing a direct comparison of AC133+ cells from such individuals with AC133+ cells from patients with leukemia. In addition to our comparison of MDS versus AML, our Blast Bank collection should prove to have a wide range of other applications in hematology. First, BAMP comparison of specimens between healthy individuals and leukemia patients is likely to shed light on the molecular events that underlie leukemogenesis. Second, in some leukemias including CML and MDS, overt leukemia is preceded by an indolent, chronic phase. Comparison of specimens obtained at different stages of such leukemias should facilitate characterization of the mechanism of disease progression. Third, collection of Blast Bank specimens over the long term would allow the sampling of leukemia patients at both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant stages; comparison of such samples should help to identify genes that contribute to the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. In conclusion, with the use of BAMP screening, we have identified a candidate MDS-specific gene. Further analysis of a larger number of patients is required to clarify whether the expression of the Dlk gene is indeed a useful marker for the diagnosis of MDS.
We thank F. Takaku, H. Mizoguchi, and S. Sugano for critical reading of the manuscript; Y. Nakamura and T. Tanaka for advice on RNA amplification; and S. Kajigaya for helpful suggestions.
Submitted October 26, 2000; accepted March 21, 2001.
Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Research on the Human Genome, Tissue Engineering, and Food Biotechnology and a Grant-in-Aid for Research on the Second-Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan; by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan; and by the Science Research Promotion Fund of the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Hiroyuki Mano, Division of Functional Genomics, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Kawachi-gun, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan; e-mail: hmano{at}jichi.ac.jp.
1. Aul C, Gattermann N, Schneider W. Age-related incidence and other epidemiological aspects of myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1992;82:358-367[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Lowenthal RM, Marsden KA. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Int J Hematol. 1997;65:319-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982;51:189-199[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Hamblin TJ. Intensive chemotherapy in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Rev. 1992;6:215-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 5. Brito-Babapulle F, Catovsky D, Galton DAG. Clinical and laboratory features of de novo acute myeloid leukemia with trilineage myelodysplasia. Br J Haematol. 1987;66:445-450[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 6. Childs CC, Stass SA. Characterization and diagnosis of acute leukemias. In: Stass SA, ed. The Acute Leukemias. New York, NY: Dekker; 1987:1-16. 7. Nagai K, Matsuo T, Atogami S, et al. Remission with morphological myelodysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemias: implications for early relapse. Br J Haematol. 1992;81:33-39[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 8. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999;21:10-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 9. Wang K, Gan L, Jeffery E, et al. Monitoring gene expression profile changes in ovarian carcinomas using cDNA microarray. Gene. 1999;229:101-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Khan J, Bittner ML, Saal LH, et al.
cDNA microarrays detect activation of a myogenic transcription program by the PAX3-FKHR fusion gene.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:13264-13269
11.
Heller RA, Schena M, Chai A, et al.
Discovery and analysis of inflammatory disease-related genes using cDNA microarrays.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:2150-2155
12.
Miraglia S, Godfrey W, Yin AH, et al.
A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning.
Blood.
1997;90:5013-5021
13.
Maw MA, Corbeil D, Koch J, et al.
A frameshift mutation in prominin (mouse)-like 1 causes human retinal degeneration.
Hum Mol Genet.
2000;9:27-34
14.
Hin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, et al.
AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
Blood.
1997;90:5002-5012
15.
Van Gelder RN, von Zastrow ME, Yool A, Dement WC, Barchas JD, Eberwine JH.
Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1990;87:1663-1667
16.
Laborada J, Sausville EA, Hoffman T, Notario V.
dlk, a putative mammalian homeotic gene differentially expressed in small lung cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor cell line.
J Biol Chem.
1993;268:3817-3820 17. Sato K, Mano H, Yazaki Y, Hirai H. Molecular cloning and analysis of the human Tec protein-tyrosine kinase. Leukemia. 1994;8:1663-1672[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
18.
Harnick DJ, Jayaraman T, Ma Y, Mulieri P, Go LO, Marks AR.
The human type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor from T lymphocytes: structure, localization, and tyrosine phosphorylation.
J Biol Chem.
1995;270:2833-2840 19. Smas CM, Sul HS. Pref-1, a protein containing EGF-like repeats, inhibits adipocyte differentiation. Cell. 1993;73:725-734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Jensen CH, Krogh TN, Hojrup P, et al. Protein structure of fetal antigen 1 (FA1): a novel circulating human epidermal growth factor-like protein expressed in neuroendocrine tumors and its relation to the gene products of dlk and pG2. Eur J Biochem. 1994;225:83-92[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Fleming RJ, Purcell K, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The NOTCH receptor and its ligands. Trends Cell Biol. 1997;7:437-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Mano H. Tec family of protein-tyrosine kinases: an overview of their structure and function. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1999;10:267-280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
Liang R, Fei YJ, Prasad PD, et al.
Human intestinal H+/peptide cotransporter: cloning, functional expression, and chromosomal localization.
J Biol Chem.
1995;270:6456-6463 24. Liu W, Liang R, Ramamoorthy S, et al. Molecular cloning of PEPT 2, a new member of the H+/peptide cotransporter family, from human kidney. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1995;1235:461-466[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Shimamoto K, Lebrun B, Yasuda-Kamatani Y, et al.
DL-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartate, a potent blocker of excitatory amino acid transporters.
Mol Pharmacol.
1998;53:195-201 26. Simonin F, Befort K, Gaveriaux-Ruff C, et al. The human delta-opioid receptor: genomic organization, cDNA cloning, functional expression, and distribution in human brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:1015-1021[Abstract]. 27. Tartaglia LA, Dembski M, Weng X, et al. Identification and expression cloning of a leptin receptor, OB-R. Cell. 1995;83:1263-1271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Konopleva M, Mikhail A, Estrov Z, et al.
Expression and function of leptin receptor isoforms in myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: proliferative and anti-apoptotic activities.
Blood.
1999;93:1668-1676
29.
Moore KA, Pytowski B, Witte L, Hicklin D, Lemischka IR.
Hematopoietic activity of a stromal cell transmembrane protein containing epidermal growth factor-like repeat motifs.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:4011-4016 30. Luo L, Salunga RC, Guo H, et al. Gene expression profiles of laser-captured adjacent neuronal subtypes. Nat Med. 1999;5:117-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
A. Tefferi and J. W. Vardiman Myelodysplastic Syndromes N. Engl. J. Med., November 5, 2009; 361(19): 1872 - 1885. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Komrokji and J. M. Bennett What Is "WHO"?: Myelodysplastic Syndrome Classification and Prognosis ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Nimer Myelodysplastic syndromes Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4841 - 4851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Nilsson, P. Eden, E. Olsson, R. Mansson, I. Astrand-Grundstrom, B. Strombeck, K. Theilgaard-Monch, K. Anderson, R. Hast, E. Hellstrom-Lindberg, et al. The molecular signature of MDS stem cells supports a stem-cell origin of 5q myelodysplastic syndromes Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 3005 - 3014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Steensma The spectrum of molecular aberrations in myelodysplastic syndromes: in the shadow of acute myeloid leukemia Haematologica, June 1, 2007; 92(6): 723 - 727. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ganser, M. A. Morgan, and E. M. Weissinger Going from genes to proteins in myelodysplastic syndromes PNAS, January 23, 2007; 104(4): 1109 - 1110. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pellagatti, M. Cazzola, A. A. N. Giagounidis, L. Malcovati, M. G. D. Porta, S. Killick, L. J. Campbell, L. Wang, C. F. Langford, C. Fidler, et al. Gene expression profiles of CD34+ cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: involvement of interferon-stimulated genes and correlation to FAB subtype and karyotype Blood, July 1, 2006; 108(1): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Briggs, K. E. Shults, L. A. Flye, S. A. McClintock-Treep, M. H. Jagasia, S. A. Goodman, F. I. Boulos, J. W. Jacobberger, G. T. Stelzer, and D. R. Head Dysregulated Human Myeloid Nuclear Differentiation Antigen Expression in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Evidence for a Role in Apoptosis. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4645 - 4651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tefferi Pathogenesis of Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Metaplasia J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8520 - 8530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sternberg, S. Killick, T. Littlewood, C. Hatton, A. Peniket, T. Seidl, S. Soneji, J. Leach, D. Bowen, C. Chapman, et al. Evidence for reduced B-cell progenitors in early (low-risk) myelodysplastic syndrome Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 2982 - 2991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tehranchi, R. Invernizzi, A. Grandien, B. Zhivotovsky, B. Fadeel, A.-M. Forsblom, E. Travaglino, J. Samuelsson, R. Hast, L. Nilsson, et al. Aberrant mitochondrial iron distribution and maturation arrest characterize early erythroid precursors in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes Blood, July 1, 2005; 106(1): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Steensma and A. F. List Genetic Testing in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Molecular Insights Into Hematologic Diversity Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2005; 80(5): 681 - 698. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Passioura, A. Dolnikov, S. Shen, and G. Symonds N-Ras-Induced Growth Suppression of Myeloid Cells Is Mediated by IRF-1 Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 797 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chen, W. Zeng, A. Miyazato, E. Billings, J. P. Maciejewski, S. Kajigaya, E. M. Sloand, and N. S. Young Distinctive gene expression profiles of CD34 cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome characterized by specific chromosomal abnormalities Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 4210 - 4218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Ebert and T. R. Golub Genomic approaches to hematologic malignancies Blood, August 15, 2004; 104(4): 923 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chiaretti, X. Li, R. Gentleman, A. Vitale, M. Vignetti, F. Mandelli, J. Ritz, and R. Foa Gene expression profile of adult T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia identifies distinct subsets of patients with different response to therapy and survival Blood, April 1, 2004; 103(7): 2771 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-K. Hofmann, S. de Vos, M. Komor, D. Hoelzer, W. Wachsman, and H. P. Koeffler Characterization of gene expression of CD34+ cells from normal and myelodysplastic bone marrow Blood, November 15, 2002; 100(10): 3553 - 3560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Qian, A. A. Fernald, L. A. Godley, R. A. Larson, and M. M. Le Beau Expression profiling of CD34+ hematopoietic stem/ progenitor cells reveals distinct subtypes of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia PNAS, November 12, 2002; 99(23): 14925 - 14930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schoch, A. Kohlmann, S. Schnittger, B. Brors, M. Dugas, S. Mergenthaler, W. Kern, W. Hiddemann, R. Eils, and T. Haferlach Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 10008 - 10013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Giles, A. Keating, A. H. Goldstone, I. Avivi, C. L. Willman, and H. M. Kantarjian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Hematology, January 1, 2002; 2002(1): 73 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Greenberg, N. S. Young, and N. Gattermann Myelodysplastic Syndromes Hematology, January 1, 2002; 2002(1): 136 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||