| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Department of Maternal and Fetal Medicine,
Division of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of
Reproductive and Developmental Biology, and Department of Haematology,
Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus,
London, United Kingdom.
Isolating fetal erythroblasts from maternal blood offers a
promising noninvasive alternative for prenatal diagnosis. The current immunoenzymatic methods of identifying fetal cells from background maternal cells postenrichment by labeling Isolating fetal nucleated red blood cells
(NRBCs) from maternal blood should allow first trimester noninvasive
prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy and monogenic disorders.1
There are currently 3 steps: enrichment of fetal cells in maternal
blood, identification of fetal cells among background maternal cells,
and diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or
single-cell techniques. Antibody directed against the Current rare-event enrichment protocols yield small numbers of
fetal erythroblasts against a large background of maternal NRBCs.3,10 After sorting, separate fetal cell
identification and genetic diagnosis procedures promote loss of rare
cells and compromise specificity. Thus, an accurate slide-based
identification system, which allows genetic analysis of only fetal
cells among what is typically a 100- to 1000-fold higher postenrichment
background of contaminating maternal erythroblasts, is desirable.
Strategies to date combining immunoenzymatic labeling of fetal antigens
and chromosomal FISH4,11-13 have proved problematic. First, colored dyes such as Fast Red dissolve in the organic solvents used in FISH, while Vector Blue Substrate affects hybridization efficiency. Secondly, they necessitate either spatial orientation and
relocation during subsequent analysis or cumbersome switching between
light and fluorescence microscopes. To obviate this, fluorophores could
be used to label fetal antigens, but their application has been limited
by heme autofluorescence and overlap of colors with those used for
FISH.2 Thus, no current technique allows simultaneous visualization of fetal cell marker and the nuclear hybridization signal.
We describe the development of a novel technique for simultaneous
visualization of fetal NRBC morphology, intracytoplasmic Fetal blood samples
Slide preparation and controls
Studying heme autofluorescence To determine the limiting effect of heme autofluorescence on choosing a fluorescence label for antiglobin antibody, we studied 4 groups of 50 fetal erythroblasts from the same sample at 9 weeks' gestation. In 3 groups, the cells were stained by fluorescence immunocytochemistry using either fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), or AMCA (7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid) for either the - or the -globin chain and the fluorescence intensities of positive cells studied. The fourth group was not stained, and the autofluorescence within the cells was determined through the red (Texas Red), green (FITC), and blue (DAPI;
4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole · 2HCl) channels. We used FITC
and AMCA to label -globin (Europa Bioproducts, Cambridge, United
Kingdom) but for PE labeled -globin instead because it was
commercially available preconjugated (Europa Bioproducts). To compare
image intensities, all images were ColourNormalised (256 gray levels;
IPLab Software, Digital Scientific, Cambridge, United Kingdom)
according to set criteria before analysis. Ten randomly selected
clusters of 5 neighboring cells were studied for each of the 4 study
groups. Clusters were labeled 1 to 10 consecutively, upon selection.
Within each cell, 10 small areas within the cytoplasm were studied. A
mean fluorescence intensity was calculated for each cluster of 5 cells.
This number was transformed to a relative fluorescence intensity of
cluster (RFIC) by making it a percentage of the 256 gray
levels.17 Within each filter channel green, red, and
blue the difference between corresponding RFICs was calculated.
Combined fluorescence immunocytochemistry and chromosomal FISH Slides were fixed in 1:1 (vol/vol) methanol:acetone for 8 minutes at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.25% glacial acetic acid in methanol (vol/vol), and rinsed in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST; Dako, Carpinteria, CA). They were incubated with goat serum (Sigma Diagnostics, St Louis, MO) diluted 1:5 in TBST for 30 minutes followed by incubation with anti- monoclonal antibody
(Europa Bioproducts) diluted 1:100 for 60 minutes and were washed twice
after each incubation. Subsequent incubations were with biotinylated
goat antimouse (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and with
streptavidin conjugated with AMCA (Vector Laboratories), both diluted
1:100 and incubated for 30 minutes. Reagents were diluted in TBST;
incubations were in a humidifying chamber at room temperature; and
washes were in TBST for 3 minutes. Slides were dehydrated through 70%,
90%, and 100% ethanol, air dried, and prepared for FISH to the sex
chromosomes. The chromosome-specific centromeric repeat probes DXZ1,
labeled with SpectrumOrange, and DYZ1, labeled with Spectrumgreen
(Vysis, Downer's Grove, IL), were used. Five microliters of the probe,
diluted 1:1 in hybridization buffer, containing 50% formamide and 10%
dextran sulfate in 2 × SSC at pH 7.0, was added to each cytospin
under a cover glass. Target DNA was denatured on an in situ
hybridization block at 71°C for 7 minutes followed by 4 hours of
hybridization at 37°C. Posthybridization washes included once in
0.4 × SSC at 72°C for 2 minutes and twice in 2 × SSC at room
temperature for 2 minutes. Slides were dehydrated through an ethanol
series and mounted in fluorescence antifade medium (Vector
Laboratories). The slides were analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy
using single band pass filters for Spectrumaqua (aqua) and
Spectrumorange (orange) and a triple band pass filter set for DAPI,
FITC, and Texas Red. Images were captured using a cooled charge-coupled
device camera and reviewed in Quipps m-FISH software (Vysis).
Statistics Pearson's correlation coefficient, Spearman's rho, and the Mann-Whitney were derived using SPSS Software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Heme autofluorescence The mean difference in the RFICs between stained and unstained erythroblasts was greater with AMCA (mean 43.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34.2-51.8; SD = 13.9) as the reporting label compared with FITC (mean 24.1; 95% CI, 16.3-31.9; SD = 12.4) or PE (mean 9.8; 95% CI, 4.8-14.8; SD = 8.0) (Figure 1). Viewed through the green channel, 55.9% of unstained cells have a greater (auto)fluorescence intensity than weakly stained positive cells; this latter group of weakly stained cells represents 23.8% of all positive cells, and 20.1% of all green cells fall within this zone of ambiguity. Similarly, through the red channel, 68.7% of unstained cells have a greater (auto)fluorescence intensity than weakly stained positive cells; this latter group of weakly stained cells represents 58.2% of all positive cells, and 46.0% of all red cells fall within this zone of ambiguity. In the remaining 79.9% of cases for green and 54% of the cases for red, stained and autofluorescent cells can be easily distinguished by optimizing the fluorescence threshold on the color histogram in the image-capture software. In contrast, there is no overlap of fluorescence between stained and unstained cells viewed through the blue channel, suggesting that confusion between positive and negative cells is unlikely. AMCA was therefore chosen to label the anti- globin antibody and improve specificity.
Combined fluorescence immunocytochemistry and chromosomal FISH Figure 2 demonstrates simultaneous visualization of -globin as an intracytoplasmic fetal
cell identifier and chromosomal FISH; the figure includes controls. The
large -globin-positive erythroblast in Figure 2A is typical for 9 weeks. Use of DAPI as nuclear counterstain proved unnecessary because
-positive erythroblasts fluoresce blue and -negative
erythroblasts autofluoresce in the Spectrumaqua channel, clearly
identifying the location of the cells and demarcating their nuclear
boundaries (Figure 2B-D). The median hybridization efficiency for 2 FISH signals per AMCA-positive nucleated cell was 97%, comparable to
the 98% (n = 5 sample pairs; z = 0.74, nonsignificant)
obtained in control slides of male and female lymphocytes. All
erythroblast-like K562 cells cultured in 0.1 mM hemin were positive for
(n = 1,500; 3 samples of 500 cells each) whereas no adult NRBC
(n = 1,000; 5 samples of 200 cells each) or white blood cell
(n = 250 000; 5 samples of 50 000 cells each) expressed -globin
protein. Specificity was thus 100%. In sample mixtures (n = 6
experiments), the technique was sensitive enough to identify
consistently one -positive fetal NRBC among 105 adult
white blood cells (P < .001) and distinguished between male fetal and adult female erythroblasts (Figure 2E-H).
Frequency of -positive erythroblasts in
circulating fetal blood declined linearly to reach almost negligible levels by 14 weeks (Figure 3).
Rare-event detection in this field poses many problems, the greatest being loss of the few precious cells during enrichment, identification, and diagnosis.18 Sorting, whether by magnetic-10 or fluorescence-based19 methods, is an essential and necessarily separate step. However, combining diagnosis with identification in situ to permit simultaneous visualization has several advantages: It limits further fetal cell loss, reduces the risk of either technique failing, and enhances specificity. The pivotal step in developing this technique was circumventing heme autofluorescence, which had thus far been the limiting factor preventing simultaneous visualization of the fetal cell identifier and molecular genetic signal.2,4 Previous attempts at reducing or correcting autofluorescence, which involved concomitant use of dyes absorbing certain emitted wavelengths20 or mathematical manipulations of pixel intensity,17 met with little success. We chose, instead, to systematically study heme autofluorescence within first trimester fetal erythroblasts. Red and green fluorophores were found unsuitable to label intracytoplasmic globins because in a significant proportion of cases it was difficult to distinguish between stained and unstained cells; another problem is that these colors are also commonly used to label FISH probes.2 Using AMCA to label the globin eliminated this source of confusion. Blue is also the color most commonly reserved for nuclear counterstain in chromosomal FISH and, fortuitously, DNA counterstaining proved unnecessary using this technique on intact cells, because AMCA acts as surrogate counterstain. We are currently investigating why AMCA accumulates around the nucleus, sometimes appearing intranuclear in two-dimensional views such as Figure 2B,C; we postulate it may be due to leakage of hemoglobin nearer the cell membrane during permeabilization. Autofluorescence through aqua allows the recognition of heme-containing cells, a unique feature that can be exploited to differentiate between AMCA-stained and -unstained erythroblasts (Figure 2B-D). Postenrichment frequencies of fetal erythroblasts among contaminating
maternal cells range from 10 Classical data analyzing hemolysates demonstrate negligible levels of
The ability to concurrently visualize a fetal cell marker and a
hybridization signal within the interphase nucleus represents a
significant advance for prenatal diagnosis using fetal cells derived
from maternal blood. Direct labeling with AMCA-conjugated anti-
We thank M. Antoniou for providing the K562 cell line and M. Preece for statistical advice.
Submitted July 24, 2000; accepted March 27, 2001.
Supported by an Overseas Graduate Scholarship from National University of Singapore (M.C.) and by a grant from Wellbeing (C.C.).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Mahesh Choolani, Department of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Division of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; e-mail: mchoolani{at}cwcom.net.
1. Bianchi DW. Fetal cells in the maternal circulation: feasibility for prenatal diagnosis. Br J Haematol. 1999;105:574-583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. DeMaria MA, Zheng YL, Zhen D, Weinschenk NM, Vadnais TJ, Bianchi DW. Improved fetal nucleated erythrocyte sorting purity using intracellular antifetal hemoglobin and Hoechst 33342. Cytometry. 1996;25:37-45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Wang JY, Zhen DK, Falco VM, et al. Fetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: fluorescence activated cell sorting-based positive selection using anti-gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti-CD45 depletion and anti-gamma globin positive selection. Cytometry. 2000;39:224-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Oosterwijk JC, Mesker WE, Ouwerkerk-van Velzen MC, et al. Development of a preparation and staining method for fetal erythroblasts in maternal blood: simultaneous immunocytochemical staining and FISH analysis. Cytometry. 1998;32:170-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 5. Pembrey ME, Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB. Maternal synthesis of haemoglobin F in pregnancy. Lancet. 1973;1:1350-1354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Weatherall DJ.
Single gene disorders or complex traits: lessons from the thalassaemias and other monogenic diseases.
BMJ.
2000;321:1117-1120 7. Mavrou A, Kolialexi A, Zheng YL, Metaxotou C, Bianchi DW. Improved specificity of NRBC detection in chorionic villus sample supernatant fluids using anti-zeta and anti-epsilon monoclonal antibodies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1999;14:291-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Chung SW, Wong SC, Clarke BJ, Patterson M, Walker WH, Chui DH.
Human embryonic zeta-globin chains in adult patients with alpha-thalassemias.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1984;81:6188-6191
9.
Luo HY, Liang XL, Frye C, et al.
Embryonic hemoglobins are expressed in definitive cells.
Blood.
1999;94:359-361 10. Ganshirt-Ahlert D, Burschyk M, Garritsen HS, et al. Magnetic cell sorting and the transferrin receptor as potential means of prenatal diagnosis from maternal blood. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1350-1355[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Price CM, Kanfer EJ, Colman SM, Westwood N, Barrett AJ, Greaves MF.
Simultaneous genotypic and immunophenotypic analysis of interphase cells using dual-color fluorescence: a demonstration of lineage involvement in polycythemia vera.
Blood.
1992;80:1033-1038
12.
Zheng YL, Carter NP, Price CM, et al.
Prenatal diagnosis from maternal blood: simultaneous immunophenotyping and FISH of fetal nucleated erythrocytes isolated by negative magnetic cell sorting.
J Med Genet.
1993;30:1051-1056 13. Pazouki S, Hume R, Burchell A. A rapid combined immunocytochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridisation method for the identification of human fetal nucleated red blood cells. Acta Histochem. 1996;98:29-37[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Campagnoli C, Fisk N, Overton T, Bennett P, Watts T, Roberts I.
Circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells in first trimester fetal blood.
Blood.
2000;95:1967-1972 15. Kearney L. Detection of genomic sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization to chromosomes. In: Wilkinson DG, ed. ). In Situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach. The Practical Approach Series. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998:161-188.
16.
Rutherford T, Clegg JB, Higgs DR, Jones RW, Thompson J, Weatherall DJ.
Embryonic erythroid differentiation in the human leukemic cell line K562.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1981;78:348-352 17. Szollosi J, Lockett SJ, Balazs M, Waldman FM. Autofluorescence correction for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry. 1995;20:356-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Busch J, Huber P, Pfluger E, Miltenyi S, Holtz J, Radbruch A. Enrichment of fetal cells from maternal blood by high gradient magnetic cell sorting (double MACS) for PCR-based genetic analysis. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:1129-1140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
19.
Herzenberg LA, Bianchi DW, Schroder J, Cann HM, Iverson GM.
Fetal cells in the blood of pregnant women: detection and enrichment by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1979;76:1453-1455 20. Mosiman VL, Patterson BK, Canterero L, Goolsby CL. Reducing cellular autofluorescence in flow cytometry: an in situ method. Cytometry. 1997;30:151-156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Andrews K, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA, Rubinsztein DC. Enrichment of fetal nucleated cells from maternal blood: model test system using cord blood. Prenat Diagn. 1995;15:913-919[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Holzgreve W, Garritsen HS, Ganshirt-Ahlert D. Fetal cells in the maternal circulation. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:410-418[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 23. Wang JY, Zhen DK, Falco VM, et al. Fetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: fluorescence activated cell sorting-based positive selection using anti-gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti-CD45 depletion and anti-gamma globin positive selection. Cytometry. 2000;39:224-230. 24. Yeoh SC, Sargent IL, Redman CW, Wordsworth BP, Thein SL. Detection of fetal cells in maternal blood. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11:117-123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 25. Adinolfi M. Breaking the blood barrier. Nat Genet. 1992;1:316-318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 26. Gale RE, Clegg JB, Huehns ER. Human embryonic haemoglobins Gower 1 and Gower 2. Nature. 1979;280:162-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
27.
Mesker WE, Velzen MC, Oosterwijk JC, et al.
Two-colour immunocytochemical staining of gamma (
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
M. A. Santos, K. O'Donoghue, J. Wyatt-Ashmead, and N. M Fisk Fetal cells in the maternal appendix: a marker of inflammation or fetal tissue repair? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2319 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar and A. O'Brien Recent developments in fetal medicine BMJ, April 24, 2004; 328(7446): 1002 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. O'Donoghue, M. Choolani, J. Chan, J. de la Fuente, S. Kumar, C. Campagnoli, P.R. Bennett, I.A.G. Roberts, and N.M. Fisk Identification of fetal mesenchymal stem cells in maternal blood: implications for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 9(8): 497 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Choolani, K. O'Donoghue, D. Talbert, S. Kumar, I. Roberts, E. Letsky, P. R. Bennett, and N. M. Fisk Characterization of first trimester fetal erythroblasts for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 9(4): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||