Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torok-Storb, B.
Right arrow Articles by Storb, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torok-Storb, B.
Right arrow Articles by Storb, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 August 2001, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 891-892

CORRESPONDENCE

To the editor:

Increased prevalence of CMV gB3 in marrow of patients with aplastic anemia

Various infectious agents have been implicated in causing aplastic anemia (AA), either by direct lytic infection or by inducing a pathophysiologic host immune response.1 But little attention has been given to cytomegalovirus (CMV), even though the myelosuppressive potential of this virus, in vivo as well as in vitro, is well established.2-6 Undoubtedly, the relatively high prevalence of this virus has made it an unlikely agent for AA, which is a very rare disease. But CMV has a broad spectrum of pathogenicities and sites of infection. Mechanisms responsible for this heterogeneity are not defined but are hypothesized to include both host and viral differences.

Our past studies indicate that genetically distinct strains of CMV, identified by variations in the gene encoding envelope glycoprotein B (gB), occur at variable frequencies and can be associated with different clinical outcomes.5-8 CMV gB types 1 and 2 were shown to be more frequently associated with survival following marrow transplantation than were types 3 and 4.7 In a second study, types 3 and 4 were specifically associated with death due to persistent neutropenia.5

Given the strong statistical association between CMV gB3/4 with posttransplantation myelosuppression, we hypothesized that these strains may also contribute to the pathogenesis of AA and, if so, that the virus would be detected more frequently in AA marrow than in marrow from patients with other hematologic diseases and, further, that gB types 3 and/or 4 would be overrepresented.

To test this hypothesis, we measured the incidence of CMV-infected marrow and the distribution of gB types in AA patients compared to patients with other hematologic diseases. Experimental samples consisted of fresh-frozen marrow biopsies obtained from 100 CMV-seropositive AA patients before transplantation. Controls consisted of marrow aspirates from 151 CMV-seropositive non-AA patients harvested at day 28 after allogeneic marrow transplantation. This control population was chosen because it has an increased risk of CMV exposure, reactivation, and disease, thereby raising the background of CMV in the control samples and making our estimate of differences between AA patients and controls more conservative. Patient groups were similar for gender and ethnic background but differed in regard to age, with the AA patient group being much younger. For this reason, the logistic regression analysis was adjusted for age. CMV genotyping was based on sequence variations in the gene encoding gB as detected by restriction analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified gB DNA.5 Table 1 shows that the frequency distribution of CMV gB types differs between AA and control patients, with the control group being comparable to previously reported results. Results shown in Table 2 indicate that the odds of possessing CMV in the marrow, particularly gB type 3, are significantly increased among AA patients. This association, together with previous reports, makes it reasonable to hypothesize a role for CMV in the pathogenesis of aplastic anemia in some patients.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Frequency distribution of CMV genotypes gB 1 through 4 


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Logistic regression analyses for outcome of being CMV positive (CMV+) in marrow and for outcome of possessing gB3 among patients who were CMV+ in marrow


Beverly Torok-Storb, Laura Bolles, Mineo Iwata, Kristine Doney, George E. Sale, Theodore A. Gooley, and Rainer Storb
Correspondence: Beverly Torok-Storb, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D1-100, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024

References

1. Young NS, Maciejewski J. The pathophysiology of acquired aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1365-1372[Free Full Text].

2. Simmons P, Kaushansky K, Torok-Storb B. Mechanisms of a cytomegalovirus-mediated myelosuppression: perturbation of stromal cell function versus direct infection of myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:1386-1390[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3. Brown AM, McFarlin DE. Relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the SJL/J mouse. Lab Invest. 1981;45:278-284[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

4. Boeckh M, Hoy C, Torok-Storb B. Occult cytomegalovirus infection of marrow stroma. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:209-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

5. Torok-Storb B, Boeckh M, Hoy C, Leisenring W, Myerson D, Gooley T. Association of specific cytomegalovirus (CMV) genotypes with death from myelosuppression after marrow transplantation. Blood. 1997;90:2097-2102[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Mutter W, Reddehase MJ, Busch FW, Bühring H-J, Koszinowski UH. Failure in generating hemopoietic stem cells is the primary cause of death from cytomegalovirus disease in the immunocompromised host. J Exp Med. 1988;167:1645-1658[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7. Fries BC, Chou S, Boeckh M, Torok-Storb B. Frequency distribution of cytomegalovirus envelope glycoprotein genotypes in bone marrow transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:769-774[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

8. Shepp DH, Match ME, Ashraf AB, Lipson SM, Millan C, Pergolizzi R. Cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B groups associated with retinitis in AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:184-187[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Scheinberg, S. H. Fischer, L. Li, O. Nunez, C. O. Wu, E. M. Sloand, J. I. Cohen, N. S. Young, and A. John Barrett
Distinct EBV and CMV reactivation patterns following antibody-based immunosuppressive regimens in patients with severe aplastic anemia
Blood, April 15, 2007; 109(8): 3219 - 3224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Gealy, M. Denson, C. Humphreys, B. McSharry, G. Wilkinson, and R. Caswell
Posttranscriptional Suppression of Interleukin-6 Production by Human Cytomegalovirus
J. Virol., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 472 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Goodrum, C. T. Jordan, S. S. Terhune, K. High, and T. Shenk
Differential outcomes of human cytomegalovirus infection in primitive hematopoietic cell subpopulations
Blood, August 1, 2004; 104(3): 687 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. D. Goodrum, C. T. Jordan, K. High, and T. Shenk
Human cytomegalovirus gene expression during infection of primary hematopoietic progenitor cells: A model for latency
PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 16255 - 16260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torok-Storb, B.
Right arrow Articles by Storb, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torok-Storb, B.
Right arrow Articles by Storb, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020