|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Department of Medicine/Hematology and
Oncology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt
Universität Berlin; Department of Medicine/ Hematology and
Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität
München; Department of Medicine, Universität
Würzburg; Department of Medicine, Universität Heidelberg;
Medizinische Klinik III, Klinikum Gro Rituximab (IDEC-C2B8) is a chimeric antibody that binds to the
B-cell surface antigen CD20. Rituximab has significant activity in
follicular non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Much less is known about the effects
in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We have initiated a phase II
trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with
CD20+ pretreated CLL. To avoid the rituximab-associated
toxicity, we restricted the tumor cell load, as measured by the number
of circulating lymphocytes and the spleen size, in the first 2 cohorts
of patients included in the study. Patients received 4 intravenous
infusions of 375 mg/m2 once a week over a period of 1 month. Of the 28 patients evaluable for response, 7 patients showed a
partial remission (National Cancer Institute criteria) lasting for a
median of 20 weeks, with 1 patient still in remission after 71 weeks.
Based on lymphocyte counts only, we found at least a 50% reduction of
lymphocyte counts lasting for at least 4 weeks in 13 (45%) of 29 patients. Fifteen patients from 3 institutions were monitored for the
immunophenotype profile of lymphocyte subsets. The number of
CD5+CD20+ cells decreased significantly and
remained low until day 28 after therapy. T-cell counts were not
affected. With the exception of one rituximab-related death, adverse
events in the remaining patients were mild. The results suggest that
rituximab has clinical activity in pretreated patients with B-CLL.
Toxicity is tolerable. Response duration after withdrawal of rituximab
is rather short. Therefore, other modes of application and the
combination with other agents need to be tested.
(Blood. 2001;98:1326-1331) Rituximab (IDEC-C2B8) is a chimeric antibody that
binds to the B-cell surface antigen CD20. It has been approved for use
in relapsed or refractory low-grade follicular lymphoma. Phase II trials in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have demonstrated response rates ranging from 48% to 62%.1-3
The overall response rate rose to 95% in 38 of 40 patients when
rituximab was administered in combination with chemotherapy. Among
patients with mantle cell lymphoma, the response rate was only
30%.4,5
In most trials, rituximab was administered as 4 weekly infusions
of 375 mg/m2. For the treatment of patients with relapsing
or refractory aggressive lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and
mantle cell lymphoma), 8 weekly infusions at a dose of 375 mg/m2 in arm A or 1 infusion of 375 mg/m2
followed by 7 weekly infusions of 500 mg/m2 in arm B have
been compared. A total of 5 complete responses and 12 partial responses
were observed among the 54 enrolled patients, with no difference
between the 2 schedules.6
The CD20 antigen expression is restricted to the B-cell lineage,
including most B-cell neoplasias. The immunophenotype of B-cell chronic
lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) shows the expression of B-cell-associated
antigens (CD19, CD20, CD79a) as well as CD5 and CD23.7
However, the levels of CD20 expressed in B-CLL are lower than in other
NHLs. This may explain why clinical trials with rituximab in CLL are
rare.8,9 To test the safety and efficacy of rituximab as a
single agent in CLL, a phase II study was initiated by the German CLL
Study Group.
High tumor cell load in peripheral blood was associated with severe
side effects upon administration of rituximab. This phenomenon may be
induced by rapid tumor lysis and a release of large amounts of
cytokines.10-13 To reduce the potential toxicity of
rituximab, we excluded patients with a very high tumor cell load, as
measured by lymphocyte numbers in the blood and by spleen size, in the first 2 cohorts of 5 patients.
The clinical observations were complemented by monitoring the
immunophenotypic profile of lymphocytes in a subset of patients.
Patients
Patients were divided into 3 cohorts according to tumor mass as defined
by spleen size and mass of the circulating tumor cells. Group 1 (patients 1-5) had a lymphocyte count below 20.0 × 109/L
(20.0/nL) and spleen less than 5 cm below the costal margin; group 2 (patients 6-10) had fewer than 50.0 × 109/L
(50.0/nL) lymphocytes with no limitation for spleen size; and group 3 (patients 11-30) had no limitations. After the occurrence of severe
complications that resulted in death of patient no.16 (see below), a
protocol amendment was released re-establishing the limitations of
group 2 for further patient recruitment.
Treatment plan
Evaluation Baseline evaluation included disease history and previous medication; current stage of disease, including signs and symptoms as well as measurement of lesions by physical examination; and radiographic studies (chest x-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound). Bone marrow biopsy and aspiration were performed. Laboratory testing included complete and differential blood counts, immunophenotyping of mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood, clinical chemistry, testing of serum immunoglobulins, testing of 2-microglobulin, urinalysis, and Coombs test.
Physical examination, laboratory values, and adverse events were recorded weekly throughout the treatment period. Hematologic and physical examinations were performed monthly thereafter until progression. Exact quantitation of the phenotypic CD20 expression of CLL cells has
not been performed. As a substitute, we have determined the ratio of
the mean fluorescence intensities of the CD20+ cells and of
the CD20 Lymphocyte subgroups according to phenotype as defined by flow cytometry during and up to 1 month after therapy were investigated in 15 patients from 3 participating centers. Definition of end points The objective remission rate was the primary efficacy end point of the study. All responses as well as the time point of subsequent progression were discussed by an expert group in an extramural review session. The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored Working Group guidelines14 were applied for the definition of response and time to progression (with 2 minor modifications: To be considered a complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR), the patient must maintain the response criteria for at least 1 month, and down-staging of a Binet stage must occur to define a remission).Complete remission. Criteria for CR include no evidence of disease; absence of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or constitutional symptoms; and normal blood count: neutrophils more than 1.5 × 109/L (1.5/nL), platelets more than 100 × 109/L (100/nL), hemoglobin more than 110 g/L (11 g/dL), lymphocytes less than 4.0 × 109/L (4.0/nL), and bone marrow biopsy with normal cellularity and lymphocytes less than 30% (NCI criteria). Partial remission. Criteria for PR include a change from stage C to stage A or B or a change from stage B to A (Binet); or at least a 50% reduction in blood lymphocytes and at least a 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy and/or at least a 50% reduction in splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly, plus at least one of the following features: neutrophils more than 1.5 × 109/L (1.5/nL) or at least a 50% improvement over baseline, platelets more than 100 × 109/L (100/nL) or at least a 50% improvement over baseline, hemoglobin more than 110 g/L (11.0 g/dL) (not supported by transfusion) or at least a 50% improvement over baseline (NCI criteria). Stable disease. In stable disease, there is no change in the stage of the disease (Binet) and no CR, PR, or progression. Progression. Criteria for progression include a change from stage A disease to stage B or C or from stage B to stage C. At least one of the following occurs: at least a 50% increase in the largest diameter of at least 2 lymph nodes or new palpable lymph nodes; at least a 50% increase of splenomegaly or hepatomegaly or transformation to a more aggressive histology, Richter syndrome, or prolymphocytic leukemia; and at least a 50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes (all percentages in relation to "nadir" findings). Time to progression is defined as time from the first application of rituximab to detection of progression as defined here. All adverse events were categorized and graded according to the NCI-CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) system.Hematologic response. In addition to the remission rate, the hematologic response was evaluated as defined by the at least 50% reduction of lymphocytes lasting for at least 4 weeks from the end of rituximab treatment. Statistics Descriptive biostatistical methods were used throughout. Time to progression and duration of response were analyzed by the product limit method of Kaplan and Meier.15 Comparisons of response data between prognostic subgroups were performed using the Fisher exact test. The Wilcoxon-Pratt test was applied for within-group comparison of laboratory data.
Patient characteristics Between September 1998 and July 1999, 31 patients were enrolled into the study by 8 German clinical institutions. One patient withdrew his consent after inclusion and did not receive any trial medication. The remaining 30 cases received rituximab and form the basis of the following analyses. One patient (no. 16) died within 24 hours after start of rituximab therapy and was excluded from several analyses.The demographic and pretreatment disease characteristics of the study
population are presented in Table 1. For
most patients, pretreatment included chlorambucil. Twenty-three (77%)
of 30 were also treated with fludarabine prior to the study. Most
patients showed lymphadenopathy, whereas isolated splenomegaly was seen in one patient. Table 2 summarizes the
baseline clinical findings.
Treatment Twenty-nine of 30 patients received 4 courses of 375 mg/m2 rituximab once a week over a period of 1 month. Interruptions or delays in the drug infusion were reported in 6 cases (5% of infusions). Three of these episodes were due to the "allergy type" reactions that occurred during the first cycle. Three others were caused by diarrhea or acute infections.Response to therapy Based on the criteria of the NCI Working Group, 7 of 28 patients showed an objective response, corresponding to a response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval, 11%-45%). One case was not evaluable due to insufficient data. All 7 patients fulfilled the criteria for PR. PR was defined in patients 0, 4, 5, and 10 by the decrease of lymphocyte counts and of enlarged lymph nodes (and spleen, if enlarged before therapy) by more than 50%. In patient no. 27, PR was defined by the decrease of enlarged lymph nodes only, because lymphocyte count was normal before the start of treatment. As in patients 9 and 24, the lymphocyte count was reduced by more than 50%, lymph nodes remaining stable after treatment, and the change from Binet stage C to B was considered to be a sufficient additional criterion for PR. The change of Binet stage was caused by the increase of thrombocyte counts from 44 (82) before treatment up to 130 (135) after treatment, respectively. Twelve (43%) patients fulfilled criteria for transient disease stabilization. Nine (32%) patients were refractory to treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis (including the patients with early death and insufficient response data, respectively) showed an overall PR rate of 7 (23%) of 30 (95% confidence interval, 10%-42%). The overall median response duration was 20 weeks, with one patient still in remission after 71 weeks (Figure 1).
Table 3 shows overall response according
to potential prognostic factors. The individual groups were too small
for the statistical analysis. No responses were detected in a subgroup
of 8 cases with a Karnofsky index 80% or less and increased lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) values.
Based on the analysis of lymphocyte counts (hematologic response), 13 (45%) of 29 patients showed a 50% or greater reduction or
normalization during or shortly after therapy, lasting for at least 4 weeks from the end of therapy. In most cases with initially elevated
lymphocyte counts, an increase in lymphocyte numbers 1 to 2 months
after the treatment was observed (Figure
2). Neutrophil, hemoglobin, and platelet
levels remained stable during and up to 2 months after therapy (Table
4). LDH values decreased significantly from a median value of 240 U/L pretreatment to 200 U/L on day 15, 190 U/L on day 22, and 200 U/L on day 29. Of 13 evaluable patients
suffering from B symptoms at study entry, 5 (38%) showed a resolution
of this condition at the time of the first posttreatment follow-up.
Disease progression occurred after a median of 16 weeks (Figure 1). Currently, there are 21 survivors. Immunophenotyping Rituximab treatment reduces the number of peripheral blood CLL cells expressing the CD20 antigen. Fifteen patients from 3 institutions were monitored for the immunophenotypical profile of lymphocyte subsets during and up to 4 weeks after treatment (Figure 3). The number of CD5+CD19+ cells and CD19+CD20+ cells decreased distinctly against the baseline values and remained low until day 28 after therapy (50 days from the beginning of treatment). Similarly, the monoclonal lymphocyte population as defined by light chain expression showed parallel behavior. T-cell counts (CD3+CD45+CD7+) were not affected by rituximab.
Adverse events Rituximab may cause severe side effects. One treatment-related death occurred during this study in a 65-year-old patient (no.16) with leukocyte counts at treatment initiation of 274.0 × 109/L (274.0/nL). Ten hours after the first infusion of rituximab (42.5 mg in 50 mL over 6.5 hours) the patient developed a syndrome of multiorgan failure with renal failure, elevation of serum potassium to 6.6 mM, acidosis, and, finally, cardiac arrest. Autopsy revealed prominent leukostasis, especially in the lungs, and a transition to Richter syndrome in all lymph nodes investigated. Subsequent to this adverse event, further patient selection was restricted to a maximum baseline lymphocyte count of 50.0 × 109/L (50.0/nL) (Volker Kunzmann et al, manuscript submitted, June 2000).The following toxicity analyses are based on studies of 29 patients who
received the full protocol treatment. A total of 86 events were
reported. Because some events of identical characteristics were
repeatedly reported in individual patients, the number of CTC event
types "per patient" was reduced to 78. The most frequent adverse
reactions were related to the typical syndrome arising during the first
infusion of rituximab. This included flulike symptoms (52% of the
patients), fever (31%), rigors and/or chills (34%), tachycardia
(17%), hypotension (10%), vomiting (10%), and headache (7%).
Infections of all CTC grades occurred in 7 (24%) of 29 patients. Table
5 shows the frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events by organ sites. Five cases of CTC grade 3-4 infections consisted of sinusitis and/or laryngitis, pneumonia, generalized herpes
zoster infection, and phlegmon of the arm. One infection occurred 1 month after the initiation of rituximab with septicemia resistant to
antibiotic treatment and, later, a lethal pulmonary aspergillosis. In
21 patients without infection, neutrophil counts at baseline were
higher (mean 3.0 × 109/L [3.0/nL], median
2.7 × 109/L, range 0.0-8.8 × 109/L) when
compared with 7 patients with infections (mean
1.7 × 109/L, median 1.8 × 109/L, range
0.4-3.2 × 109/L). In one patient, cancer of the bladder
was diagnosed some weeks after start of rituximab treatment. Patients
17 to 30 were premedicated with prednisone after lethal toxicity
occurred in patient no. 16. The frequency of flulike symptoms in
patients 1 to 15 was 11 (73.3%), in comparison to 4 (28.6%) in
patients 17 to 30.
Rituximab has exhibited significant antilymphoma activity in more than 300 patients with low-grade NHL, but its role in CLL patients has been controversial. In a study focusing on the safety of rituximab in patients with high numbers of circulating CD20+ cells, 9 patients with heavily pretreated CLL were treated with 375 mg/m2 rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. Rapid reduction of peripheral malignant cells was observed in all patients.13 In our trial PR was observed in 7 of 28 patients evaluable for response, and a reduction specifically of lymphocyte counts was detected more frequently, with 13 of 29 patients showing at least a 50% reduction or normalization of lymphocytes lasting for at least 4 weeks. These remission rates in CLL are comparable to those obtained in mantle cell lymphoma (13 of 35 pretreated patients),4 in small B-cell lymphocytic lymphoma (4 of 28 patients and 8 of 14 patients),4,16 and in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (3 of 7 patients)3 using rituximab. Higher response rates have been observed when circulating B-CLL cells rather than lymph nodes and spleen size were used as parameters. This finding may be explained by different antibody penetration into various tumor compartments.17 Increased infusion-related side effects and rapid tumor clearance have been seen in patients with high numbers of circulating blood tumor cells.10,12,13 Therefore, in our trial patients were entered in 3 subsequent cohorts according to the tumor mass: group 1 (5 patients) with lymphocytes below 20.0 × 109/L (20.0/nL) and spleen less than 5 cm below costal margin; group 2 (5 patients) with lymphocytes below 50.0 × 109/L (50.0/nL). In the first 2 cohorts, no serious side effects were observed. Therefore, after toxicity evaluation of cohorts 1 and 2, the subsequent patients were included without limitation of lymphocyte counts, but a modified schedule with administration of 50 mg rituximab on day 1, 150 mg on day 2, and 400 to 500 mg (rest of 375 mg/m2) on day 3 of the first infusion cycle was applied. Severe toxicity was observed in a patient with a very high tumor load when a 42.5 mg total dose of rituximab was given for 6.5 hours. After this severe complication, the protocol was amended to exclude patients with lymphocytes numbering more than 50.0 × 109/L (50.0/nL). No severe toxicity has been observed in the following 15 patients enrolled. The syndrome observed in patients with high tumor cell load and treated
with rituximab is different from the tumor lysis syndrome observed in
patients with high-grade lymphoma, in which severe electrolyte
disturbances and renal failure were characteristic, and
thrombocytopenia was frequent.11 Instead, symptoms of
cytokine release were observed, followed by gradual tumor cell
destruction and tumor cell agglutination in the lung, liver, heart, and
spleen. Indeed, cytokine release (tumor necrosis factor- Apart from toxicity in patients with very high cell counts, rituximab was generally well tolerated, with most toxicity being directly related to the infusion (most commonly the first infusion). All patients (excluding patient no. 16) received the full protocol treatment. The hematologic toxicity also was similar to previous reports and was usually mild and transient. Hemoglobin, thrombocytes, T-lymphocyte subsets, and immunoglobulins were not significantly altered. Bacterial infections were found in 6 of 29 patients during rituximab therapy. Lymphocyte subgroups were investigated in 15 patients. The most pronounced decline in lymphocyte subsets was demonstrated in CD19+/CD20+ lymphocytes. T lymphocytes were not affected. The rituximab-induced decrease in lymphocyte subpopulations lasted for at least 4 weeks after the end of rituximab application. These findings suggest that (1) decline of B lymphocytes is not only simulated by modulation of CD20 expression or by blockade of the cell surface epitope by rituximab; (2) a subgroup of CD20+ and/or monoclonal B lymphocytes escape from the effect of rituximab; and (3) T lymphocytes are not affected. Single-agent rituximab as given in this trial did not result in a higher response rate than reported with alkylating agents. Therefore, rituximab as a single agent might play a role in patients with poor bone marrow reserve for whom other options have failed. In addition, other modes of application and combination with other agents could produce more encouraging results. Response duration in our patients was short. The role of maintenance therapy therefore needs to be investigated. Extended rituximab therapy (8 consecutive infusions of 375 mg/m2) in patients with recurrent or relapsed low-grade or follicular NHL has been reported to yield a favorable 60% response rate.20 Using rituximab for the maintenance therapy might also be a promising approach. Stable disease has been achieved in B-CLL patients with progression after an initial response to rituximab when 100 mg rituximab per patient was given monthly in an ongoing trial (unpublished data, S.S., June 2000). Thrice-weekly application has been investigated in CLL patients in a phase I/II study and proved to be a feasible and active regimen.8 Dose escalation was tested in different subtypes of NHL, including CLL. All patients received a first dose of 375 mg/m2, and almost no toxicity was seen on subsequent escalated doses until 2250 mg/m2 was reached.9 To analyze the effect of combination immunotherapy, patients were
treated with rituximab in combination with interferon- The combination of rituximab and chemotherapy was investigated in 40 patients with low-grade, mostly follicular B-cell NHL receiving 6 infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m2) together with 6 doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 95% with a response duration of 46-plus months.5 The combination of fludarabine and rituximab will be tested in untreated CLL patients in an ongoing trial of the German CLL Study Group. In conclusion, rituximab as a single agent shows efficacy in the treatment of B-CLL. Side effects are usually mild, but in patients with high blood tumor cell counts toxicity may be lethal and therapy should be initiated with caution. A reduction of the numbers of circulating tumor cells below 50.0 × 109/L (50.0/nL) before using rituximab by conventional chemotherapy seems reasonable. To improve the therapeutic potential, prolonged application of rituximab and maintenance therapy as well as the combination with other therapeutic principles like chemotherapy, response modifiers, high-dose chemotherapy, or radioimmunoconjugates22 should be investigated.
Submitted August 1, 2000; accepted April 25, 2001.
Supported by funding from Hoffmann-La Roche AG (D.H., M.H., S.S., C.P., and B.E.).
U.R. is employed by Hoffman-La Roche AG, whose product was studied in the present work.
Preliminary results presented as a poster at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology in New Orleans, December 3-7, 1999.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Dieter Huhn, Dept of Medicine/Hematology and Oncology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany; e-mail: dieter.parczany{at}charite.de.
1. Maloney DG, Grillo-López AJ, Bodkin DJ, et al. IDEC-C2B8: results of a phase I multiple-dose trial in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:3266-3274[Abstract]. 2. Mc Laughlin P, Grillo-López AJ, Link BK, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2825-2833[Abstract].
3.
Byrd JC, White CA, Link B, et al.
Rituximab therapy in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: preliminary evidence of clinical activity.
Ann Oncol.
1999;10:1525-1527
4.
Foran JM, Rohatiner AZ, Cunningham D, et al.
European phase II study of rituximab (chimeric anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody) for patients with newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma and previously treated mantle-cell lymphoma, immunocytoma, and small B-cell lymphocytic lymphoma.
J Clin Oncol.
2000;18:317-324
5.
Czuczman MS, Grillo-López AJ, White CA, et al.
Treatment of patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy.
J Clin Oncol.
1999;17:268-276
6.
Coiffier B, Haioun C, Ketterer N, et al.
Rituximab (anti-cd20m monoclonal antibody) for the treatment of patients with relapsing or refractory aggressive lymphoma: a multicenter phase II study.
Blood.
1998;92:1927-1932
7.
Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, et al.
A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group.
Blood.
1994;84:1361-1392 8. Byrd JC, Grever MR, Davis B, et al. Phase I/II study of thrice weekly rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL): a feasible and active regimen [abstract]. Blood. 1999;94:704a. 9. O'Brien SM, Thomas DA, Freireich EJ, et al. Rituxan has significant activity in patients with CLL [abstract]. Blood. 1999;94:603a. 10. Jensen M, Winkler U, Manzke O, Diehl V, Engert A. Rapid tumor lysis in a patient with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphocytosis treated with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8, rituximab). Ann Hematol. 1998;77:89-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Byrd JC, Waselenko JK, Maneatis TJ, et al.
Rituximab therapy in hematologic malignancy patients with circulating blood tumor cells: association with increased infusion-related side effects and rapid blood tumor clearance.
J Clin Oncol.
1999;17:791-795
12.
Lim LC, Koh LP, Tan P.
Fatal cytokine release syndrome with chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in a 71-year-old patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
J Clin Oncol.
1999;17:1962-1963
13.
Winkler U, Jensen M, Manzke O, Schulz H, Diehl V, Engert A.
Cytokine-release syndrome in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high lymphocyte counts after treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8).
Blood.
1999;94:2217-2224
14.
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, et al.
National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.
Blood.
1996;87:4990-4997 15. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. Am Stat Assoc J. 1958;53:457-481[CrossRef].
16.
Hainsworth JD, Burris HA, Morrissey LH, et al.
Rituximab monoclonal antibody as initial systemic therapy for patients with low grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Blood.
2000;95:3052-3056
17.
Press O, Appelbaun F, Ledbetter J, et al.
Monoclonal antibody 115 (anti-CD20) serotherapy of human B cell lymphomas.
Blood.
1987;69:584-591
18.
Wing MG, Moreau T, Greenwood J, et al.
Mechanism of first-dose cytokine-release syndrome by CAMPATH 1-H: involvement of CD16 (Fc
19.
Moreau T, Coles A, Wing MG, et al.
Transient increase in symptoms associated with cytokine release in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Brain.
1996;119:225-237
20.
Piro LD, White CA, Grillo-López AJ, et al.
Extended rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) therapy for relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Ann Oncol.
1999;10:655-662 21. Davis T, Maloney D, White CA. Combination immunotherapy of low grade or follicular (LG/F) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with rituximab and alpha interferon: interim analysis. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1998;17:11a.
22.
Vose JM, Wahl RL, Saleh M, et al.
Multicenter Phase II study of iodine-131 tositumomab for chemotherapy-relapsed/refractory low-grade and transformed low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
J Clin Oncol.
2000;18:1316-1323
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
| ||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|
  C. Meyer zum Buschenfelde, Y. Feuerstacke, K. S. Gotze, K. Scholze, and C. Peschel GM1 Expression of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Determines Susceptibility to Rituximab Treatment Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5414 - 5422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. K. Oldham and R. O. Dillman Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy: 25 Years of Progress J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2008; 26(11): 1774 - 1777. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Coiffier, S. Lepretre, L. M. Pedersen, O. Gadeberg, H. Fredriksen, M. H. J. van Oers, J. Wooldridge, J. Kloczko, J. Holowiecki, A. Hellmann, et al. Safety and efficacy of ofatumumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase 1-2 study Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1094 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. G. Wierda Treatments for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 297 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Li, M. E. Williams, J. B. Cousar, A. W. Pawluczkowycz, M. A. Lindorfer, and R. P. Taylor Rituximab-CD20 Complexes Are Shaved from Z138 Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells in Intravenous and Subcutaneous SCID Mouse Models J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 4263 - 4271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Carlo-Stella, A. Guidetti, M. Di Nicola, C. Lavazza, L. Cleris, D. Sia, P. Longoni, M. Milanesi, M. Magni, Z. Nagy, et al. IFN-{gamma} Enhances the Antimyeloma Activity of the Fully Human Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Monoclonal Antibody 1D09C3 Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3269 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Venugopal and S. A. Gregory Lymphoproliferative disorders ASH Self-Assessment Program, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 265 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
</ |
Top
Abstract
Introduction
40%). All patients
gave their written informed consent prior to the study. The exclusion
criteria included pretreatment with a murine antibody; known allergic
reactions; active infections; serious concurrent cardiovascular, lung,
psychiatric, or metabolic diseases; inadequate renal or hepatic
function; as well as previous organ transplantation.
cells in the samples stained with anti-CD20
monoclonal antibody coupled to fluorescein isothiocyanate. This ratio,
in all participating laboratories, is typically below 40:1 in
B-CLL. In B-CLL with CD20dim expression, this ratio is less
than 10:1.
+ or 
+/CD19+ lymphocytes. (D)
CD45+/CD7+ or CD3+
lymphocytes. Indicated P values (Wilcoxon-Pratt test,
2-sided): (1) .022, (2) .0015, (3) .0005, (4) .083, (5) .065, (6) .014.
,
interferon-
, interleukin-6) has been described in context of side
effects of rituximab