| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
PHAGOCYTES
From the Institute of Molecular Genetics and Institute
of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Faculty
of Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
An unusual CD18 monoclonal antibody (mAb) MEM-148 binds, in
contrast to standard CD18 mAbs, specifically to peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophils activated by various stimuli such as phorbol
myristate acetate, opsonized zymosan, heat-aggregated immunoglobulin,
and (after priming with lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis factor, or
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) also by
formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. In addition, in vivo activated
neutrophils obtained from urine of patients following recent
prostatectomy were also strongly positive for MEM-148. On the activated
myeloid cells the mAb recognized a 65- to 70-kd protein identified
immunochemically and by mass spectrometric peptide sequencing as a
membrane-anchored fragment of CD18 (the common chain of leukocyte
integrins) produced by proteolytic cleavage. The CD18 fragment
originated mainly from integrin molecules stored intracellularly in
resting cells, it was unassociated with CD11 chains, and its formation
was inhibited by several types of protease inhibitors. Thus, the 65- to
70-kd CD18 fragment represents a novel abundant activation marker of
myeloid cells of so far unknown function but possibly involved in
conformational changes in leukocyte integrin molecules resulting in
increased affinity to their ligands.
(Blood. 2001;98:1561-1566) Activation of myeloid cells by various physiologic
and experimental stimuli is accompanied by multiple surface changes
connected mainly to degranulation (externalization and thus enhanced
surface expression of several membrane proteins stored in cytoplasmic granules), proteolytic shedding, and internalization of distinct sets
of molecules. Thus, activated blood myeloid cells typically up-regulate
surface expression of complement receptor type 3 (CR3; CD11b/CD18),
alkaline phosphatase, or chemotactic receptors1 and
down-modulate surface density of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptor
CD14, adhesion receptors CD44 and CD62L, or antiadhesion sialoglycoprotein CD43.2
Leukocyte integrins are major adhesion molecules of white blood cells.
They are noncovalent transmembrane heterodimers composed of the common
In this report we describe a novel activation marker abundantly
expressed on the surface of activated monocytes and neutrophils Reagents and antibodies
Cells
Flow cytometry Cells were stained with mAbs (20 µg/mL) for 30 minutes on ice and washed in HBSS containing 0.2% gelatin and 0.1% NaN3 without Ca++ and Mg++ followed by fluorescein-labeled goat F(ab')2 antimouse Ig (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). Propidium iodide (PI; 0.1 µg/mL) and LDS-751 (0.2 µg/mL; Exciton, Dayton, OH) were added prior to measurement on a FACSort flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) in a standard 3-color setup. At least 104 viable nucleated cells (PI , LDS-751+) were collected
for each sample. Leukocyte populations were resolved on the basis of
their scatter properties.
Immunoprecipitation, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blotting Cells were surface biotinylated using biotinamidocaproic acid 3-sulfo-N-hydoxysuccinimide ester and solubilized on ice in isotonic lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P40 (NP40) detergent and standard mixture of protease inhibitors; the supernatant was used directly for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (solid-phase immunoisolation technique), or immunoaffinity chromatography. Immunoprecipitated biotinylated proteins were detected on the blots by streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate and luminographic visualization. The immunoaffinity columns were washed with 10 volumes of the lysis buffer, the adsorbed proteins were eluted with alkaline buffer (0.1 M glycine-NaOH, pH 11.5, containing 0.1% NP40), and separated by nonreducing SDS-PAGE. Details of biochemical methods were described previously.15 Densitometric evaluation of the zones on Western blots has been performed on LAS-1000 (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan).Native electrophoresis and 2-dimensional electrophoresis (native versus SDS-PAGE) Native non-SDS-PAGE (blue native electrophoresis, BNE) was performed essentially as described elsewhere.17 Briefly, 5 × 106 cells were solubilized in 200 µL of the native lysis buffer (1% n-dodecyl -D-maltoside, 5 mM
iodoacetamide and 1 mM 4-[2-aminoethyl]benzenesulfonyl fluoride in
750 mM aminocaproic acid, 50 mM Bis-tris, pH 7.0) and centrifuged for 3 minutes at 20 000g; Coomassie brilliant blue G was mixed
with the supernatant to yield the final concentration of 0.25%. The
5-µL samples were run on water-cooled gradient gels (6%-15%). A
strip of the gel corresponding to single lane was equilibrated in the
nonreducing sample buffer for SDS-PAGE and used for second-dimension
separation by standard SDS-PAGE (7.5% gel). The separated proteins
were then electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane
and visualized by immunoperoxidase staining. The molecular weight
standards used for the first-dimension separation (BNE) were monomers
and oligomers (obtained by chemical cross-linking) of bovine serum
albumin or mouse IgG1 mAb.
Mass spectrometric analysis The Coomassie brilliant blue-stained protein band was cut from the gel and washed several times with 10 mM dithiotreitol (DTT) and 0.1 M 4-ethylmorpholine acetate (pH 8.1) in 50% acetonitrile. After complete destaining, the gel was washed with water, shrunk by dehydration with acetonitrile, and reswollen again in water. Next, the gel was partly dried using a SpeedVac concentrator (Savant Instruments, Holbrook, NY) and then reconstituted with cleavage buffer containing 0.01% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M 4-ethylmorpholine acetate, 10% acetonitrile, 1 mM CaCl2, and sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI; 50 ng/µL). Digestion was carried out overnight at 37°C; the resulting peptide mixture was extracted with 50% acetonitrile/1% trifluoroacetic acid and separated on the C18 reverse-phase column (0.3 × 150 mm; LC Packings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) using gradient elution (5% acetonitrile/0.5% acetic acid to 95% acetonitrile/0.4% acetic acid). The column was linked to the nano-electrospray ionization (ESI) interface of the mass spectrometer. Positive full scan and collision-induced dissociation mass spectra were recorded on a LCQ DECA ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermoquest, San Jose, CA) equipped with nano-ESI ion source and interpreted manually. Spray voltage was held at 2.2 kV, tube lens voltage was 10 V. The
heated capillary was kept at 150°C with a voltage of 32 V. Full scan
spectra were acquired over m/z range 300 to 2000 d. Collision
energy was kept at 42 units and the activation time was 30 ms.
Collisions were done from the first intense ion in the each
chromatographic peak; every 2 scans were accumulated.
The MEM-148 mAb (either intact IgG or its Fab fragment) bound only
very weakly to resting PBLs, but the respective antigen was
up-regulated on monocytes and neutrophils activated by PMA, OZ, HA-Ig,
and (after priming with either LPS, TNF, or GM-CSF) also by fMLP
(Figure 1A and data not shown). The
MEM-148 epitope became clearly detectable after 15 minutes of treatment
and gradually increased during 2 hours (Figure 1B and data not shown).
Its appearance was closely paralleled by microscopically observable
firm aggregation of the myeloid cells or their adhesion to serum-coated
plastic, which is well known to be elicited by all these treatments
(not shown). Neutrophils obtained from urine of prostatectomy patients were strongly positive for MEM-148 without any treatment (Figure 1A);
these cells were obviously naturally activated as a consequence of
local inflammation. Moreover, all PBLs (including lymphocytes) became
strongly positive for MEM-148 after a brief exposure to acidic
solutions, MEM-148 stained 78- to 96-kd zones corresponding to various
forms of CD18 on Western blots of nonreduced leukocyte detergent
lysates, and strongly reacted with CD18-transfected COS-7
cells.15 Thus, MEM-148 obviously reacts with an epitope of
CD18, which is inaccessible in CD11/CD18 heterodimers present on
resting leukocytes but becomes exposed during dissociation of the
heterodimers by low pH or SDS and also as a result of a conformational
change caused by cell activation.
Surprisingly, MEM-148 specifically immunoprecipitated a protein of 65- to 70-kd from detergent lysates of activated, surface biotinylated
PBLs. This protein was also immunoprecipitated (in addition to the
CD11/CD18 heterodimers) by standard CD18 mAbs but not by mAbs to CD11a,
CD11b, or CD11c (Figure 2A). This zone was more prominent in the immunoprecipitates obtained from the cells
that were surface labeled after PMA activation rather than before the
activation, indicating that most of the 65- to 70-kd protein (or its
precursor) appeared on the cell surface only after the activation. The
kinetics of appearance of this molecule following activation by PMA
closely paralleled the increase of the MEM-148 positivity (Figures 1B
and 2B). A protein of apparently identical size and recognized not only
by MEM-148 but also by at least some other CD18 mAbs could be clearly
detected (in addition to the intact CD18 molecular species) by Western
blotting in the lysates of PBLs activated by various stimuli (Figure
2C) and in the lysates of in vivo activated neutrophils isolated from
urine of prostatectomized patients (not shown). These results indicated
that the 65- to 70-kd protein is a truncated form of CD18, apparently
unassociated with CD11 chains. Indeed, analysis by 2-dimensional
electrophoresis (native BNE versus nonreducing SDS-PAGE) demonstrated
that the 65- to 70-kd CD18 form was not associated with either CD11
chains or any other proteins (Figure 3A).
To confirm that this protein is actually a form of CD18 and not a
different, cross-reactive protein, detergent cell lysate of
PMA-activated PBLs was first precleared on a standard anti-CD18
immunosorbent and the unbound fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting using MEM-148. As shown in Figure 3B, the 65- to 70-kd
protein was quantitatively adsorbed to the CD18 immunosorbent. Finally,
the protein was immunopurified from the lysate of PMA-activated PBLs
and analyzed by mass spectrometric peptide mapping and sequencing; 4 CD18-derived peptides were unambiguously identified by sequencing
(Table 1). The results of this peptide mapping suggest that the fragment comprises the major C-terminal part
of CD18 involving at least residues 345 to 733. However, it is not
clear at this moment where exactly is the N-terminus of the
fragment.
Expression of the MEM-148 epitope on the surface of activated myeloid
cells, as well as the appearance of the 65- to 70-kd CD18 form, were
markedly suppressed by several types of protease inhibitors (Figure
4). It should be noted that under the
conditions used, degranulation induced by the activation stimuli was
essentially unaffected by the inhibitors as judged by typical increased
expression of leukocyte integrins (Figure 4A). Interestingly,
inhibitors of serine proteases (DFP, AEBSF), cysteine proteases (IAA),
and metalloproteases (Phen) exhibited partial inhibitory effects (see "Discussion"). Notably, serine protease inhibitors DFP and AEBSF were only very slightly inhibitory on monocytes as compared to neutrophils. The 65- to 70-kd fragment of CD18 could not be removed from the cell surface by acid washing (Figure 4B, last lane) indicating that it possesses the transmembrane segment anchoring it firmly to the
cell surface. This conclusion is strongly supported also by the fact
that it contains a peptide (723-733) originating from the cytoplasmic
domain (Table 1).
Taken together, our data show that activation of peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophils is accompanied by formation of large amounts of a 65- to 70-kd proteolytic transmembrane fragment of CD18 unassociated with other proteins.
Adhesion of blood myeloid cells to endothelia of blood vessels in
sites of inflammation and their subsequent transmigration into the
tissue is accompanied by major reorganization of their surface In this study, we show that CD18, a common chain of
Transmembrane fragments of CD18 produced by the activation-induced
proteolytic cleavage obviously loose their association with CD11 chains
and expose the epitope recognized by mAb MEM-148, which is sterically
blocked in the intact integrin heterodimers.15 It is not
clear what happens to the respective CD11 chains during this process
(we did not have suitable antibodies reactive with free CD11 chains or
their fragments). One speculative but attractive possibility is that
the proteolytic cleavage and concomitant dissociation of the major CD18
fragment may uncover ligand-binding sites in the Actually, a proteolytic activation of platelet
We thank Dr A.Bensussan for providing us the 6.7 CD18 mAb.
Submitted June 15, 2000; accepted April 23, 2001.
Supported by grant 310/99/0349 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic and from the project Center of Molecular and Cellular Immunology LN00A026, Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Dr Václav Ho
1.
Borregaard N, Cowland JB.
Granules of the human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocyte.
Blood.
1997;89:3503-3521 2. Hooper NM, Karran EH, Turner AJ. Membrane protein secretases. Biochem J. 1997;321:265-279. 3. Springer TA. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell. 1994;76:301-314[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Gahmberg CG, Tolvanen M, Kotovuori P.
Leukocyte adhesion-structure and function of human leukocyte
5.
Kishimoto TK, Baldwin ET, Anderson DC.
The role of
6.
Harris ES, McIntyre TM, Prescott SM, Zimmerman GA.
The leukocyte integrins.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:23409-23412 7. Stewart M, Hogg N. Regulation of leukocyte integrin function: affinity vs. avidity. J Cell Biochem. 1996;61:554-561[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 8. Bazzoni G, Hemler ME. Are changes in integrin affinity and conformation overemphasized? Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:30-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 9. Binnerts ME, van Kooyk Y. How LFA-1 binds to different ligands. Immunol Today. 1999;20:240-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Humphries MJ. Integrin cell adhesion receptors and the concept of agonism. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21:29-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Plow EF, Haas TA, Zhang L, Loftus J, Smith JW.
Ligand binding to integrins.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:21785-21788 12. Leitinger B, Hogg N. From crystal clear ligand binding to designer I domains. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:614-616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. van Kooyk Y, Figdor CG. Avidity regulation of integrins: the driving force in leukocyte adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:542-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Ba
15.
Drbal K, Angelisová P, 16. Hogg N, McDowall A. CD18 Workshop Panel report. In: Kishimoto T,Kikutani H,von dem Borne AEGK, et al., eds. Leukocyte Typing VI. New York: Garland Publishing; 1997:355-357. 17. Schägger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem. 1991;199:223-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Owen CA, Campbell EJ. The cell biology of leukocyte-mediated proteolysis. J Leukoc Biol. 1999;65:137-150[Abstract]. 19. Vaday GG, Lider O. Extracellular matrix moieties, cytokines, and enzymes: dynamic effects on immune cell behavior and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;67:149-159[Abstract]. 20. Dunon D, Piali L, Imhof BA. To stick or not to stick: the new leukocyte homing paradigm. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:714-723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Lu H, Norman K, et al.
Spontaneous skin ulceration and defective T cell function in CD18 null mice.
J Exp Med.
1998;188:119-131 22. Forlow SB, White EJ, Barlow SC, et al. Severe inflammatory defect and reduced viability in CD18 and E-selectin double-mutant mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1457-1466[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
Oxvig C, Lu C, Springer TA.
Conformational changes in tertiary structure near the ligand binding site of an integrin I domain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:2215-2220 24. Shimaoka M, Shifman JM, Jing H, Takagi J, Mayo SL, Springer TA. Computational design of an integrin I domain stabilized in the open high affinity conformation. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:674-678[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Xiong JP, Li R, Essafi M, Stehle T, Arnaout MA.
An isoleucine-based allosteric switch controls affinity and shape shifting in integrin CD11b A-domain.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:38762-38767 26. Blobel CP. Remarkable roles of proteolysis on and beyond the cell surface. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:606-612[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 27. Ugwu F, Van Hoef B, Bini A, Collen D, Lijnen HR. Proteolytic cleavage of urokinase-type plasminogen activator by stromelysin-1 (MMP-3). Biochemistry. 1998;37:7231-7236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 28. Murphy G, Gavrilovic J. Proteolysis and cell migration: creating a path? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999;11:614-621[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 29. Heymans S, Luttun A, Nuyens D, et al. Inhibition of plasminogen activators or matrix metalloproteinases prevents cardiac rupture but impairs therapeutic angiogenesis and causes cardiac failure. Nat Med. 1999;5:1135-1142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Yana I, Weiss SJ.
Regulation of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase activation by proprotein convertases.
Mol Biol Cell.
2000;11:2387-2401
31.
Raza SL, Nehring LC, Shapiro SD, Cornelius LA.
Proteinase-activated receptor-1 regulation of macrophage elastase (MMP-12) secretion by serine proteinases.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:41243-41250
32.
Bohuslav J, Ho
33.
Cai TQ, Wright SD.
Human leukocyte elastase is an endogenous ligand for the integrin CR3 (CD11b/CD18, Mac-1,
34.
May AE, Kanse SM, Lund LR, Gisler RH, Imhof BA, Preissner KT.
Urokinase receptor (CD87) regulates leukocyte recruitment via
35.
Zang Q, Lu C, Huang C, Takagi J, Springer TA.
The top of the inserted-like domain of the integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1
36.
Stewart MP, McDowall A, Hogg N.
LFA-1-mediated adhesion is regulated by cytoskeletal restraint and by a Ca2+-dependent protease, calpain.
J Cell Biol.
1998;140:699-707
37.
Douglass WA, Hyland RH, Buckley CD, et al.
The role of the cysteine-rich region of the
38.
Si-Tahar M, Pidard D, Balloy V, et al.
Human neutrophil elastase proteolytically activates the platelet integrin
39.
Youker KA, Beirne J, Lee J, Michael LH, Smith CW, Entman ML.
Time-dependent loss of Mac-1 from infiltrating neutrophils in the reperfused myocardium.
J Immunol.
2000;164:2752-2758 40. Koch AE, Halloran MM, Haskell CJ, Shah MR, Polverini PJ. Angiogenesis mediated by soluble forms of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Nature. 1995;376:517-519[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 41. Robinson MK, Andrew D, Rosen H, et al. Antibody against the Leu-CAM beta-chain (CD18) promotes both LFA-1- and CR3-dependent adhesion events. J Immunol. 1992;148:1080-1085[Abstract]. 42. Petruzzelli L, Springer TA. CD18 cluster report. In: Schlossman SF,Boumsell L,Gilks W, et al., eds. Leukocyte Typing V. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1995:1592-1593.
43.
Leitinger B, Hogg N.
Effects of I domain deletion on the function of the beta2 integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1.
Mol Biol Cell.
2000;11:677-690
© 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
G. R. Van de Walle, K. Vanhoorelbeke, Z. Majer, E. Illyes, J. Baert, I. Pareyn, and H. Deckmyn Two Functional Active Conformations of the Integrin {alpha}2{beta}1, Depending on Activation Condition and Cell Type J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 36873 - 36882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-H. Tang, E. Tng, S. K. A. Law, and S.-M. Tan Epitope Mapping of Monoclonal Antibody to Integrin {alpha}L {beta}2 Hybrid Domain Suggests Different Requirements of Affinity States for Intercellular Adhesion Molecules (ICAM)-1 and ICAM-3 Binding J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 29208 - 29216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. M. Huq and L.-N. Wei Post-translational Modification of Nuclear Co-repressor Receptor-interacting Protein 140 by Acetylation Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2005; 4(7): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Xiong, J. Chen, and L. Zhang Modulation of CD11b/CD18 Adhesive Activity by Its Extracellular, Membrane-Proximal Regions J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 1042 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||