|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, 1 June 2002, Vol. 99, No. 11, pp. 4207-4215
TRANSPLANTATION
Donor-derived interferon separates graft-versus-leukemia
effects and graft-versus-host disease induced by donor CD8 T
cells
Yong-Guang Yang,
Jin Qi,
Min-Guang Wang, and
Megan Sykes
From the Bone Marrow Transplantation Section,
Transplantation Biology Research Center, Surgical Service,
Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
 |
Abstract |
The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects and graft-versus-host
disease (GVHD)-inducing activity of CD8 T cells was compared in murine
recipients of wild-type (WT) or interferon (IFN- )-deficient (GKO) allogeneic donor cells. CD8 T cells (or CD4-depleted splenocytes) from GKO donor mice induced more severe GVHD in lethally irradiated allogeneic recipients compared to the same cell populations from WT
donors. Consistent with GVHD severity, donor CD8 T-cell expansion in
allogeneic recipients was augmented in the absence of IFN- . These
results demonstrate that IFN- does not stimulate but instead down-modulates GVHD induced by donor CD8 T cells. Remarkably, antihost
lymphohematopoietic reactions, including GVL effects against host
leukemia/lymphoma cells, of CD8 T cells correlated inversely with their
GVHD-inducing activity, and those of GKO donors were markedly weaker
than those mediated by WT donor CD8 T cells. These data show for the
first time that GVHD-inducing activity and GVL effects of allogeneic
CD8 T cells can be separated by a single cytokine, IFN- .
(Blood. 2002;99:4207-4215)
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
Introduction |
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is an
effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of otherwise fatal
hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant hematopoietic disorders.
Although reduced leukemic relapse rates resulting from
graft-versus-leukemic (GVL) effects have been observed in patients
receiving HLA antigen-mismatched marrow compared to HLA-identical
transplants,1-5 the high incidences of graft-versus-host
disease (GVHD) and GVHD-induced immunodeficiency present an enormous
obstacle to HLA-mismatched BMT in humans.6-8 Thus, a major
challenge is to separate beneficial GVL effects from GVHD. Although
T-cell depletion of donor marrow can inhibit GVHD, and some studies
have shown that GVL effects can be induced in recipients of allogeneic
natural killer (NK) cells9-11 or T cell-depleted (TCD)
allogeneic BMT,12,13 a strong association of leukemic
relapse with TCD BMT has been proven in a number of animal studies and
clinical trials.14-19 The high incidence of leukemic
relapse associated with T-cell depletion indicates that in addition to
GVHD, efficient GVL effects against certain leukemias are also largely
dependent on donor T cells. Thus, methods that can selectively inhibit
the GVHD-promoting activity of allogeneic T cells while preserving
allogeneic T cell-mediated GVL effects would be highly beneficial in
the use of allogeneic BMT for the treatment of leukemia.
Previous studies have shown that interferon- (IFN- ) is required
for the inhibition of CD4-dependent GVHD and preservation of GVL
effects of donor CD8 T cells in allogeneic BMT recipients treated with
a single dose of interleukin 12 (IL-12) at the time of
transplantation.20-22 In the present study, we have
investigated the role of IFN- in the GVHD- and GVL-associated
alloreactivity of the donor CD8 T-cell subset in mice transplanted with
CD4-depleted or purified CD8+ splenocytes from WT or
IFN- -deficient allogeneic donors. Our results demonstrate that
allogeneic CD8 T cells induce more severe systemic GVHD but weaker
GVL/antihost lymphohematopoietic reactions if they are incapable of
producing IFN- . Thus, GVHD- and GVL-associated alloresponses of CD8
T cells can be dissociated by an IFN- -dependent mechanism.
 |
Materials and methods |
Mice
Specific pathogen-free wild-type (WT) and IFN- knockout (GKO)
mice on the BALB/c (BALB/c-Ifngtm1Ts,
H-2d, KdIdDd) or
C56BL/6 (C57BL/6-Ifngtm1Ts, H-2b,
KbIbDb) backgrounds were purchased
from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). WT C57BL/6 mice (B6,
H-2b, KbIbDb) were
purchased from the Frederick Cancer Research Facility (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The 2C TCR transgenic mice on a
C57BL/6 background were generously provided by Dr Dennis Y. Loh23 and were bred to the
C57BL/6-Ifngtm1Ts mice to produce GKO 2C TCR
transgenic progeny. Expression of the 2C TCR was detected by
fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis using 1B2 anti-2C
TCR monoclonal antibody (mAb; kindly provided by Dr Herman
Eisen).24 IFN- genotyping was performed by tail DNA
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers for the endogenous
(oIMR126 and oIMR127) or the targeted (oIMR128 and oIMR129) IFN-
allele as described in the Jackson Laboratory Mice Database
(www.jax.org). The sequences of these primers are: oIMR126, 5'-AGA AGT
AAG TGG AAG GGC CCA GAA G-3'; oIMR127, 5'-AGG GAA ACT GGG AGA GGA GAA
ATA T-3'; oIMR128, 5'-TCA GCG CAG GGG CGC CCG GTT CTT T-3'; oIMR129,
5'-ATC GAC AAG ACC GGC TTC CAT CCG A-3'. Mice were housed in sterilized
microisolator cages and received autoclaved feed and drinking water.
Bone marrow transplantation
Sex- and age-matched B6 mice were lethally irradiated (9.75 Gy,
137Cs source, 0.84 Gy/min) and reconstituted within 4 to 8 hours with 5 × 106 TCD allogeneic bone marrow cells
(BMCs) and 7.5 to 10 × 106 CD4-depleted or 1 to
2.5 × 106 purified CD8+ spleen cells from WT
or GKO BALB/c mice. Irradiated B6 mice transplanted with
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs were used as non-GVHD controls. In
some experiments, 5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs were also given to
allogeneic recipients to provide a readout for lymphohematopoietic GVH
reactions. In leukemia studies, recipients were additionally injected
with 500 EL4 cells, a B6 T-cell leukemia/lymphoma cell line, as
previously described.20 TCD was performed by incubating
cells with anti-CD4 mAb (GK1.5) and anti-CD8 mAb (2.43) or with
anti-CD4 only (for CD4 depletion), followed by rabbit complement, and
the completeness of depletion was verified by FACS analysis as
previously described.21,22 CD8+ splenocytes
were purified using the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Briefly, mouse spleen cells were labeled with anti-CD8
(2.43)-coated magnetic microbeads and positively selected on a magnetic
separation column. Aliquots of sorted CD8+ splenocytes were
restained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (53-5.8; Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), and their purity was consistently greater than 97%. To avoid bias from cage-related effects, animals were randomized before and after BMT as
described.25 Carcasses were saved in 10% formalin after
death or euthanasia for autopsy. Tissues (spleen, liver, kidney,
and lung) were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained
with hematoxylin and eosin. Necropsies and histologic analyses were
performed on randomly chosen samples by observers who were unaware of
which treatment group the carcasses belonged to, as previously
described.26
Induction of GVH with 2C T cells was performed by intravenous injection
of 10 × 106 BMCs and 12 × 106 splenocytes
from WT or GKO 2C TCR transgenic B6 donors into lethally irradiated (8 Gy) BALB/c mice. Non-GVHD controls received similar numbers of BMCs and
splenocytes from syngeneic donors. As described above, animals were
randomized before and after BMT.
FACS analysis
For the measurement of donor T-cell expansion and chimerism,
recipient white blood cells (WBCs) were stained for 30 minutes at 4°C
with antihost H-2Kb mAb 5F1-FITC (Pharmingen) and
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (53-6.7, Pharmingen). To
block nonspecific FcR binding of labeled antibodies, 10 µL of
undiluted culture supernatant of 2.4G2 (rat antimouse Fc R
mAb)27 was added to the first incubation. The expression of
IFN- receptor on EL4 cells was measured by staining cells with rat
antimouse CD119-FITC (GR20, Pharmingen). FITC-labeled and
biotinylated mouse IgG2a mAb HOPC-1 and PE-labeled rat IgG2a mAb
(Pharmingen) were used as nonstaining negative control antibodies.
Cells were washed with FACS buffer (Hanks balanced salt solution
containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin [BSA] and 0.1% NaN3) between each and following the last stain, and were
analyzed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
Proliferation assay
EL4 cells (2 × 103/well) and WEHI-279 cells
(1 × 104/well) were incubated in triplicate in 96-well
plates with various concentrations of recombinant murine IFN-
(Pharmingen) in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS; Sigma, St Louis, MO), 4% nutrient mixture
(L-glutamine, nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin/streptomycin), 1% Hepes buffer, and 10 µM
2-mercaptoethanol. Cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi (0.037 MBq)
3H-thymidine 36 hours after incubation, and harvested 12 hours later. 3H-thymidine uptake was counted on a
Betaplate counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) and data are presented
as the mean ± SD (cpm) of triplicate samples. WEHI-279, a murine
lymphoma cell line that is sensitive to an antiproliferative effect of
IFN- , was used as an assay control.
The Nunc 10-mm tissue culture inserts (0.4 µm polycarbonate membrane,
Nalge Nunc International, Roskilde, Denmark) were used to determine the
effects of cytokines released by alloreactive T cells (ie, mixed
lymphocyte reaction supernatants) on EL4 cell proliferation. BALB/c
spleen cells (2 × 106 in 0.5 mL) or 0.5 mL media were
added to each well of 24-well culture plates (Nalge Nunc International)
containing 30 Gy-irradiated B6 spleen cells (2 × 106 in
0.5 mL). After 10-mm tissue culture inserts were placed into each well,
2.5 × 104 EL4 cells (1 mL) were added into each insert.
EL4 cells were harvested on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 after incubation, and
the number of viable EL4 cells in each well was counted by trypan blue
exclusion. Three wells in each group were harvested at each time point
and data are presented as the mean ± SD. The culture insert used
in this study allows the permeation into the insert of cytokines produced by spleen cells, but blocks any spleen cell-mediated direct
killing of EL4 cells.
Alloreactive cytotoxic T-lymphocyte assay
BALB/c spleen cells were cultured in triplicate in 96-well
plates with irradiated B6 spleen cells (30 Gy), at a 1:1 ratio (8 × 105/well) in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS, 4%
nutrient mixture, 1% Hepes buffer, and 10 µM 2-mercaptoethanol for 5 days. Responder cells were mixed with 51Cr-labeled EL4
(target) cells in 96-well plates (8000 cells/well) at various ratios
(50:1 to 0.78:1) and incubated for 4 hours. The supernatants were
harvested and radioactivity was measured in an automatic gamma counter.
The percent specific lysis was determined as follows: specific lysis
(%) = [(cpm experimental cpm background)/(cpm maximum cpm background)] × 100%. Background cpm was taken as
spontaneous release from target cells in the absence of responder
cells, and maximum cpm as release by target cells treated with 0.5%
Nonidet P-40.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of survival data was performed with the
log-rank test. The Student t test was used to determine the
level of significance of differences in group means. A
P < .05 was considered to be significant in both types
of analysis.
 |
Results |
IFN- down-modulates CD8 T cell-mediated GVHD while mediating
GVL effects of the CD8 subset
To determine the role of IFN- in GVHD- and GVL-associated
alloresponses of allogeneic CD8 T cells, we compared these phenomena in
lethally irradiated C57BL/6 (B6) mice receiving CD4-depleted spleen
cells from WT or IFN- -deficient GKO BALB/c donors. B6 mice were
lethally irradiated (9.75 Gy) and reconstituted with 5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs (syngeneic controls) or with TCD
BMCs (5 × 106) and CD4-depleted spleen cells
(10 × 106) from WT or GKO BALB/c mice. Some recipients
were injected with 500 EL4 cells (a B6 T-cell leukemia/lymphoma cell
line) along with the BMT inoculum. It has been demonstrated that the
GVL effect against EL4 cells is donor CD8+ cell dependent
and CD4+ cell independent.20,28 Consistent
with our previous finding that lethal acute GVHD in this strain
combination is mostly CD4 dependent,22 most B6 mice
injected with WT BALB/c CD4-depleted spleen cells survived long-term
(Figure 1A). However, injection of a
similar number of GKO BALB/c CD4-depleted spleen cells into B6 mice led
to 60% mortality by 20 days (Figure 1A). Nonleukemic recipients of GKO
BALB/c cells also showed more severe weight loss compared to
nonleukemic recipients of WT BALB/c cells (Figure 1B). The body weight
of most recipients of GKO BALB/c cells (4 of 5) decreased to less than
18 g by week 1 after BMT. However, only 1 of 5 mice that received
WT BALB/c cells showed severe weight loss (< 18 g) by week 1 and the
body weight of all surviving mice in this group recovered by week 2 after BMT. Because GVHD cannot be induced by donor spleen cells if both
CD4 and CD8 T cells are depleted in this strain combination, these
results indicate that donor-derived IFN- down-modulates systemic
GVHD induced by allogeneic CD8 T cells.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 1.
Augmentation of GVHD is associated with reduction of GVL effects in B6
mice transplanted with CD4-depleted splenocytes from IFN- -deficient
GKO BALB/c mice.
B6 mice were irradiated and transplanted with 5 × 106 B6
TCD BMC ( , syngeneic), or 5 × 106 TCD BMC and
10 × 106 CD4-depleted splenocytes from WT ( , WT BALB)
or GKO ( , GKO BALB) BALB/c donors. Leukemic recipients were also
injected with 500 EL4 cells along with the BMT inoculum. Data shown are
survival (A) and survivors' body weights (B) of nonleukemic
recipients, and survival of leukemic recipients receiving 500 EL4 cells
(C).
|
|
Remarkably, donor-derived IFN- had an opposite effect on the GVL
reactivity of donor CD8 T cells. In contrast to the exacerbating effect
on GVHD, the absence of donor-derived IFN- diminished GVL effects of
donor CD8 T cells. Administration of CD4-depleted WT but not GKO BALB/c
spleen cells led to significant antileukemic effects (Figure 1C;
P < .005 for WT BALB/c recipients compared to recipients
of GKO BALB/c cells and to syngeneic BMT recipients). Autopsy analysis
was performed in randomly selected carcasses without knowledge of which
treatment the animals had received.20 Gross evidence for
tumor, which was detected in all EL4 recipients receiving transplants
with syngeneic cells, was only found in 1 of 7 recipients of WT
allogeneic BMCs plus CD4-depleted spleen cells (Experiment
[Exp] 1 in Table 1). In contrast,
evidence for tumor at autopsy was observed in 4 of 7 leukemic
recipients of GKO allogeneic BMCs plus CD4-depleted spleen cells.
Furthermore, no histologic evidence for tumor (ie, tissue infiltration
of leukemic cells) was detected in the spleen, liver, or kidney of
leukemic recipients of WT BALB/c cells that showed lack of tumor at
autopsy (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Gross evidence for tumor at autopsy in B6 recipients of TCD
BMCs plus CD4-depleted spleen cells from WT or GKO BALB/c mice
|
|
Similar results were observed in a repeat experiment. To limit the
potential for GVHD-associated mortality to interfere with the
evaluation of GVL effects, B6 recipients in this experiment were
injected with a reduced number (7.5 × 106) of BALB/c
CD4-depleted spleen cells. As shown in Figure
2A, with the exception of one nonleukemic
recipient in each of the WT and GKO allogeneic BMT groups, nonleukemic
mice survived for the duration of the experiment. However, the survival
advantage against EL4 leukemia conferred by CD4-depleted spleen cells
from GKO BALB/c mice was significantly less than that mediated by WT BALB/c CD4-depleted spleen cells (Figure 2B; P < .05 for
leukemic recipients of WT BALB/c cells compared to leukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c cells). All recipients of WT BALB/c cells were protected from leukemia-associated lethality, whereas all syngeneic recipients died of leukemia by day 32 after BMT (P < .001). Although
leukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c cells were also significantly
protected from lethality compared to syngeneic recipients
(P < .05), long-term survival was only achieved in less
than 50% of these mice. Evidence for tumor at autopsy was found in 3 of 4 leukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c cells that died by 40 days after
BMT (Exp 2 in Table 1). No tumor was detected in long-term surviving
leukemic recipients of either GKO (3 mice) or WT (7 mice) BALB/c cells.
Together, our results indicate that donor-derived IFN- contributes
to the GVL effect of allogeneic CD8 T cells, while down-modulating CD8 T cell-mediated GVHD.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 2.
IFN- is required for the induction of optimal GVL
effects.
B6 mice were irradiated and transplanted with 5 × 106 B6
TCD BMC ( , syngeneic), or 5 × 106 TCD BMC and
7.5 × 106 CD4-depleted splenocytes from WT ( ,
WT BALB) or GKO ( , GKO BALB) BALB/c donors. Leukemic
recipients were additionally injected with 500 EL4 cells along with the
BMT inoculum. Survivals of nonleukemic (A) and leukemic (B) recipients
are shown.
|
|
IFN- -deficient but not WT 2C T cells induce lethal acute
GVHD in BALB/c mice
The 2C CTL clone was originally derived from an H-2b
mouse immunized with H-2d cells, and the majority of T
cells in 2C TCR transgenic mice are CD8+2CTCR+
cells that specifically recognize Ld.24 Thus,
transplantation of T cells from 2C TCR transgenic mice to
H-2Ld+ (eg, BALB/c) mice provides a useful model to study
GVH reactivity of CD8 T cells. We have previously shown that injection
of 12 × 106 spleen cells along with BMCs from 2C TCR
transgenic donors does not induce lethal acute GVHD in BALB/c
mice,29 which is consistent with the finding that acute
GVHD is largely CD4 dependent in most major histocompatibility
complex-mismatched strain combinations in mice.28,30-32
Remarkably, IFN- seems to be required for the absence of lethal GVHD
in this 2C BALB/c BMT model. As shown in Figure
3, administration of
10 × 106 BMCs and 12 × 106 splenocytes
from IFN- -deficient 2C donors caused severe acute GVHD, with 100%
mortality by 20 days, whereas BALB/c mice receiving similar numbers of
bone marrow and spleen cells from WT 2C mice survived
long-term.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 3.
IFN- -deficient but not WT 2C T cells induce lethal
acute GVHD in BALB/c mice.
Survival is shown for irradiated (8 Gy) BALB/c mice that were
transplanted with 10 × 106 BMCs and
12 × 106 splenocytes from syngeneic donors ( ,
syngeneic), WT ( , WT 2C) or GKO ( , GKO 2C) allogeneic 2C
donors.
|
|
IFN- production by allogeneic CD8 T cells directs their
alloreactivity toward GVHD or GVL effects in vivo
Our previous studies have demonstrated that the GVL effects
against EL4 leukemia are dependent on donor CD8 T
cells.20,28 To determine whether or not IFN- produced
by the effector CD8 T cells plays a role in dissociating GVL effects
from systemic GVHD, we compared GVHD versus GVL effects in lethally
irradiated B6 mice receiving transplants with purified CD8+
T cells (1 × 106) from GKO or WT BALB/c mice. B6 TCD
BMCs (5 × 106) and GKO BALB/c TCD BMCs
(5 × 106) were given to all allogeneic BMT recipients
and 500 EL4 cells were injected into some groups. Coadministration of
TCD B6 BMCs into these lethally irradiated recipients of allogeneic
cells provided a marker for the evaluation of lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions (see below). Although GVHD death was not observed (during an
observation period of > 100 days) in the recipients of either WT or
GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells (Figure 4A),
significant loss of body weight was again observed in nonleukemic
recipients of GKO BALB/c (19.5 ± 0.9 g), but not in nonleukemic
recipients of WT BALB/c (20.7 ± 1.1 g) cells at week 1 after BMT
(P < .05). The average body weight of nonleukemic
recipients of syngeneic cells at week 1 after BMT was 20.7 ± 0.9 g.
However, GVL effects correlated inversely with the degree of
GVHD-related weight loss. Despite the more severe GVHD, as indicated by
weight loss in nonleukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 cells, the
survival of leukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 cells was not
significantly extended compared to that of syngeneic controls
(P = .17). In contrast, the survival of leukemic mice
transplanted with WT BALB/c CD8 cells was significantly prolonged
(Figure 4A; P < .005 compared to leukemic recipients of
syngeneic BMT or GKO BALB/c cells).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 4.
Allogeneic CD8 T cells
induce more severe systemic GVHD but less marked GVL effects if they
are incapable of IFN- production.
Survival is shown for nonleukemic and leukemic B6 recipients of
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs (syngeneic), or
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs plus 5 × 106 TCD GKO
BALB/c BMCs and 1 × 106 (A) or 2.5 × 106
(B) WT BALB/c CD8+ splenocytes (WT BALB), or
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs plus 5 × 106 TCD GKO
BALB/c BMCs and 1 × 106 (A) or 2.5 × 106
(B) GKO BALB/c CD8+ splenocytes (GKO BALB). Leukemic
recipients were injected with 500 EL4 cells along with the BMT
inoculum. Survival data from 2 independent experiments (panels A and B)
are shown and the numbers of mice in each group of the 2 experiments
are indicated inside parentheses (a and b are mouse numbers of the
indicated group in experiment A and experiment B, respectively).
|
|
Consistent results were observed in a repeat experiment, in which
allogeneic recipients were injected with a higher number (2.5 × 106) of WT or GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells. As shown in
Figure 4B, 40% of nonleukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8
cells died of GVHD, whereas all nonleukemic recipients of WT BALB/c CD8
cells survived long-term (> 100 days). In addition, the mean body
weight of nonleukemic recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 cells was
significantly lower than that of nonleukemic recipients of WT BALB/c
CD8 cells (19 ± 1.1 g versus 21 ± 1.2 g at week 1;
P < .05). However, unlike GVHD, the potency of GKO BALB/c
CD8 T cell-mediated GVL effects was not greater than that of WT BALB/c
CD8 T cells (Figure 4B; P = .19). A significant delay in
leukemic death was seen in leukemic recipients of both WT BALB/c
(P < .0005) and GKO BALB/c (P < .005) CD8
cells compared to leukemic recipients of syngeneic BMT. Because most
nonleukemic recipients (8 of 9) were surviving by the time when all
leukemic recipients had died in recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 cells,
leukemia, but not GVHD, was the presumed cause of death in the leukemic
group. Together, these results indicate that IFN- produced by donor
CD8 T cells contributes to their GVL effects while mitigating their
capacity to cause GVHD.
Discrepancy between systemic GVHD and antihost lymphohematopoietic
alloreactivity in recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells
Previous studies in humans and animal models have shown that
lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions that selectively eliminate host
lymphohematopoietic cells, including lymphoma cells, can be induced
without severe systemic GVHD in allogeneic BMT
recipients.33-35 To determine whether or not the loss of
GVL effects in recipients of GKO CD8 T cells was due to a reduced
lymphohematopoietic GVH reaction, we compared donor CD8 T-cell
expansion and levels of residual host hematopoietic cells in recipients
of WT or GKO allogeneic BMT along with TCD host-type BMCs. Nonleukemic
recipients of WT BALB/c or GKO BALB/c CD8 cells (these are the same
mice shown in Figure 4A) were bled at weeks 5 and 9 after BMT, and the
levels of donor CD8 T cells and surviving host cells in the recipient WBCs were determined by FACS analysis. Because these mice were injected
with 5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs along with allogeneic cells,
lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions were assessed by measuring the
preservation of host-type hematopoiesis. Consistent with the increased
severity of systemic GVHD as shown by weight loss, the extent of GKO
donor CD8 T-cell expansion was significantly greater than that of WT
CD8 T cells in B6 recipients (Figure 5A).
However, this greater expansion of GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells that was
associated with significant loss of recipient body weight was
associated with poor alloreactivity against host lymphohematopoietic
cells. The levels of host (H-2Kb+) peripheral blood cells
in mice receiving transplants with GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells were similar
to and higher than those in the recipients of WT BALB/c CD8 T cells at
weeks 5 and 9, respectively (Figure 5B). The difference was even more
significant when comparing the levels of host-type cells in non-T-cell
lineages (ie, when expanded donor T cells were excluded). As shown in
Figure 5C, the percentages of host B cells (ie, percent of
H-2Kb+CD19+ cells in the CD19+ cell
population) in recipients of GKO BLAB/c CD8 T cells were markedly
higher than that in recipients of WT CD8 T cells. These results
indicate that allogeneic CD8 T cells induce more severe systemic GVHD
but weaker antihost hematopoietic alloreactivity (and an associated
reduction in GVL effects) if they are incapable of producing
IFN- .

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 5.
Discrepancy between
donor T-cell expansion and antihost lymphohematopoietic alloreactivity
in recipients of GKO BALB/c CD8 T cells.
WBCs were prepared from nonleukemic recipients of
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs plus 5 × 106 TCD GKO
BALB/c BMCs and 1 × 106 purified CD8+
splenocytes from WT ( ; n = 10) or GKO ( ; n = 10) BALB/c mice
at indicated times. Levels of donor CD8 T
(5F1 CD8+) cells (A) and total host type
(5F1+, ie, H-2Kb+) cells (B) in the WBCs, and
percentages of host B cells (5F1+CD19+) in the
B-cell (CD19+) population (C) were determined by FACS. Data
are presented as group means (±SD). These mice are the same
nonleukemic WT BALB and GKO BALB recipients shown in Figure 4A.
*P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .0001.
|
|
CD4 CD8 donor splenocytes are required
for CD8 T cells to express maximal GVL effects
Although the GVL effect against EL4 in this model is donor CD8 T
cell dependent, neither WT nor GKO CD8 T cells, when injected with GKO
TCD BMCs, led to complete protection from leukemia induced by 500 EL4
cells (Figure 4), whereas complete protection was observed in
recipients of this EL4 dose with CD4-depleted WT donor cells (Figures 1
and 2). These results suggest that donor
CD4 CD8 spleen cells or IFN- -producing
BMCs or both play a role in the anti-EL4 GVL effect, which has been
shown to be donor CD8 T-cell dependent.20,28 To address
this possibility, we compared GVL effects in B6 recipients of 500 EL4
cells and 5 × 106 TCD WT BALB/c BMCs along with
different populations of WT BALB/c splenocytes: (1)
8.5 × 106 CD4-depleted spleen cells (with 16.5%
CD8+ cells); (2) 1.4 × 106 CD8+
splenocytes; (3) 7.1 × 106 TCD (ie, CD4 and CD8
cell-depleted) splenocytes; or (4) 1.4 × 106
CD8+ and 7.1 × 106 TCD splenocytes.
Syngeneic controls were injected with 5 × 106 TCD B6
BMCs and 500 EL4 cells. Consistent with previous
studies20,28 and the results described above (Figures 1
and 2), GVL effects against EL4 cells were completely abolished by
depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ splenocytes
(P = .1 for the recipients of TCD BALB/c splenocytes compared to syngeneic controls), whereas they were preserved if only
CD4+ splenocytes were depleted (P < .0005 for
the recipients of CD4-depleted BALB/c splenocytes compared to syngeneic
controls; Figure 6). Although leukemic
mortality was delayed in mice receiving TCD BALB/c BMCs plus purified
CD8+ BALB/c splenocytes compared to syngeneic controls
(P < .005), all of these mice eventually succumbed to
leukemia (Figure 6). However, the GVL effects were fully restored by
adding TCD (CD4 CD8 ) splenocytes back to
purified CD8+ splenocytes. The potency of GVL effects in
the recipients of a combination of CD8+ and TCD BALB/c
splenocytes was significantly greater than that in mice receiving
CD8+ BALB/c splenocytes only (P < .005), and
was indistinguishable from that in recipients of CD4-depleted BALB/c
splenocytes (P = .6; Figure 6). Thus, donor
CD4 CD8 splenocytes, which do not mediate
GVL effects when injected alone, act synergistically with CD8 T cells
to augment the antileukemic alloreactivity of CD8 T cells. Furthermore,
these results confirm our previous results20,28 that donor
CD4 cells do not contribute to GVL effects in this model.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 6.
CD4 CD8 splenocytes act
synergistically with CD8 T cells to augment GVL effects in vivo.
Survival is shown for mice that received 500 EL4 cells and
5 × 106 TCD WT BALB/c BMCs along with
8.5 × 106 CD4-depleted ( ; n = 7),
1.4 × 106 CD8+ ( ; n = 7),
7.1 × 106 TCD ( ; n = 7), or
1.4 × 106 CD8+ and 7.1 × 106
TCD ( ; n = 7) WT BALB/c splenocytes. Syngeneic controls receiving
5 × 106 TCD B6 BMCs ( ; n = 5) or
5 × 106 B6 BMC plus 500 EL4 cells ( ; n = 5) are
indicated. FACS analysis revealed that CD4-depleted splenocytes
contained 16.5% CD8+ and 83.5%
CD4 CD8 cells, so the actual numbers of
BALB/c CD8+ and CD4 CD8
splenocytes given to the recipients of 8.5 × 106
CD4-depleted BALB/c splenocytes were 1.4 × 106 and
7.1 × 106, respectively.
|
|
IFN- does not directly inhibit the proliferation of EL4
cells
Interferon- has been shown to mediate antitumor effects by
directly inhibiting tumor cell growth and inducing T cell-mediated antitumor responses.36-41 To determine whether the reduced
GVL effect in leukemic recipients of GKO allogeneic cells is due to the
loss of direct inhibition of EL4 cell proliferation by donor-derived IFN- , we measured the susceptibility of EL4 cells to an
IFN- -mediated antiproliferative effect. EL4 cells were incubated
with varying concentrations of IFN- for 48 hours and cell
proliferation was assessed by tritiated thymidine incorporation.
Despite the expression of IFN- receptor on their surface (Figure
7A), the proliferation of EL4 cells was
not significantly inhibited by IFN- , while IFN- efficiently
inhibited the growth of WEHI-279, an IFN- -susceptible murine
lymphoma cell line (Figure 7B). Moreover, no suppression of EL4
proliferation was mediated by supernatants of BALB/c-anti-B6 mixed
lymphocyte reactions, suggesting that cytokines released by
alloreactive T cells are incapable of directly suppressing the growth
of EL4 cells (Figure 7C).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 7.
EL4 cells are not
susceptible to an IFN- -mediated antiproliferative effect.
(A) A FACS profile showing expression of IFN- receptor on EL4 cells.
EL4 cells stained with anti-CD119 (IFN- receptor chain) and
isotype control mAb are presented as filled and open histograms,
respectively. Results from one representative experiment of 3 are
shown. (B) Proliferation of EL4 and WEHI-279 cells cultured in medium
containing various concentrations of IFN- . Data are presented as the
mean ± SD (cpm) of triplicate cultures in each culture condition.
Results from one representative experiment of 3 are shown. (C) Lack of
inhibitory activity on the proliferation of EL4 cells in allogeneic
mixed lymphocyte reaction supernatants. EL4 cells were cultured inside
tissue culture inserts placed in 24-well plates containing responders
(BALB/c splenocytes) and stimulators (irradiated B6 splenocytes) ( )
or stimulators only ( ) (see "Materials and methods"). Three
wells from each group were harvested at each time point and the number
of viable EL4 cells in each well was counted. Data are presented as the
mean ± SD (cell number/well) of triplicate samples.
|
|
IFN- up-regulates expression of Fas and major histocompatibility
class I on EL4 cells and moderately increases the susceptibility of EL4
cells to the cytotoxicity of allogeneic CD8 T cells
Interferon- has been shown to augment the sensitivity of tumor
cells to cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity by up-regulating surface
expression of Fas and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on tumor
cells.42,43 To determine whether or not IFN- affects
the expression of Fas and class I MHC on EL4 cells, we have analyzed
the cell surface expression of these molecules on EL4 cells treated
with IFN- in comparison with untreated EL4 cells. EL4 cells were
incubated with IFN- at various concentrations (7 different
concentrations from 0.78 to 50 ng/mL) for 12 to 14 hours. Both Fas and
MHC class I expression were up-regulated on EL4 cells treated with
IFN- at all concentrations compared to control EL4 cells incubated
in IFN- -free medium (Figure 8A and data not shown). The peak expression for both molecules was observed on
EL4 cells treated with IFN- in a concentration range of 6.25 to 12.5 ng/mL (Figure 8A). CTL assays revealed that EL4 cells are highly
sensitive to the killing activity of both WT and GKO BALB/c CTLs
(Figure 8B). Indeed, the levels of Fas and MHC class I expression were
high even on untreated EL4 cells (Figure 8A). Consistently, the
susceptibility of EL4 cells to alloreactive CTLs was only slightly
increased by pretreatment with IFN- (Figure 8B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Figure 8.
Effect of IFN- on
expression of Fas and MHC class I on EL4 cells and susceptibility of
EL4 cells to the cytotoxicity of allogeneic CD8 T cells.
(A) IFN- up-regulates Fas and MHC class I expression
on EL4 cells. Surface expression of Fas and MHC class I on EL4 cells
cultured in the absence (dotted histograms) or the presence of IFN-
(6.25 ng/mL; solid histograms) is shown. (B) Killing of EL4 cells by
alloreactive CTLs. Spleen cells from WT or GKO BALB/c mice were
stimulated with irradiated B6 splenocytes for 5 days, and the killing
activity against untreated EL4 ( ) or EL4 cells that were cultured
with IFN- (6.25 or 12.5 ng/mL for 12-14 hours) ( ) was measured by
a 51Cr-release assay. Data are presented as the average
(percent specific lysis) of triplicates. Results from one
representative experiment of at least 3 independent experiments are
shown.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The data presented here demonstrate that IFN- produced
by donor cells controls the alloresponses of donor CD8 T cells and determines whether they will mediate predominantly GVHD or
lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions with associated GVL effects.
Alloresponses mediated by GKO CD4-depleted (or purified
CD8+) BALB/c splenocytes resulted in more severe GVHD
(weight loss and mortality), but in reduced GVL effects in B6
recipients, compared to a similar cell population from WT BALB/c mice.
In association with the increased severity of GVHD, the expansion of
GKO donor CD8 T cells in vivo was significantly greater than that of WT donor CD8 T cells. However, the increased donor CD8 T-cell expansion was paradoxically associated with a reduction of lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions, which is able to mediate GVL effects without GVHD. It
has been observed both in man and in animal models that a conversion from mixed chimerism to fully allogeneic donor chimerism can occur without clinical GVHD, demonstrating that lymphohematopoietic GVH
reactions can be selectively preserved in allogeneic BMT recipients while the capacity to mediate tissue GVHD is
suppressed.33-35 Such GVH reactions directed against host
lymphohematopoietic cells can eliminate host leukemic cells and lead to
long-term remissions in recipients of allogeneic BMT who have
lymphomas.35,78 Results from the present study indicate
that IFN- production by donor cells plays an important role in the
induction of CD8 T cell-mediated lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions.
Importantly, GVHD-inducing alloresponses of CD8 T cells display a
differential response to IFN- , such that IFN- acts as an
inhibitory cytokine.
The mechanism for the discrepancy between augmented systemic GVHD
(identified as weight loss and mortality) and reduced
lymphohematopoietic GVH reactions in the recipients of GKO BALB/c cells
remains to be defined. It has been proposed that Th1 cytokines are
critical for inducing acute GVHD,44 and a number of
studies have shown that IFN- produced by activated alloreactive T
cells plays an important role in the induction of acute
GVHD.45-48 In contrast, both exogenously injected and
endogenously produced IFN- has been shown to paradoxically inhibit
GVHD,49-52 and lethal acute GVHD can be induced in the
complete absence of IFN- .22 IFN- has been reported
to play an important role in regulating the death of activated CD4 T
cells.53-59 Consistently, Fas expression on donor T cells
is required for IL-12-mediated inhibition of CD4-mediated GVHD, an
IFN- -dependent effect.22,60 In the 2C BMT model, we
have previously shown that WT 2C CD8 cells expanded greatly (about
15-fold) in BALB/c recipients at early times after transplantation.
This expansion was followed by a rapid decline in 2C CD8 cell numbers
(7- to 15-fold).29 Importantly, apoptosis was evident in a
significant proportion of host antigen-activated 2C CD8 T cells in
allogeneic transplant recipients, and the timing of the increase in
apoptosis of 2C donor CD8 T cells coincided with the decrease in the
numbers of 2C CD8 T cells in lethally irradiated BALB/c recipients of
2C splenocytes.29 It has been recently demonstrated that
IFN- also contributes to the death phase of activated CD8 T
cells.61,62 Thus, it is possible that the increased
expansion of donor CD8 T cells and associated augmentation of GVHD in
recipients of IFN- -deficient donor cells was due to decreased death
of alloreactive CD8 T cells.
However, reduced death of alloreactive donor CD8 T cells alone cannot
explain the opposing effects of IFN- on the 2 types of
alloreactivity (ie, GVHD-inducing activity and lymphohematopoietic GVH
response/GVL effects) mediated by CD8 T cells. Thus, other mechanisms
must be involved. These may include effects of IFN- on both the GVL
effector cells and the leukemic cells. Results of our ex vivo studies
indicate that IFN- does not directly suppress the proliferation of
EL4 cells (Figure 7), but that this cytokine might slightly increase
the sensitivity of EL4 cells to the cytolytic activity of alloreactive
CD8 T cells through up-regulation of MHC class I and Fas molecules
(Figure 8). However, this small increase in sensitivity of EL4 cells to
CTL-mediated killing seems insufficient to explain the observed
differences in GVL effects of WT versus GKO CD8 T cells. Differences in
the homing of alloreactive donor T cells in the presence and the
absence of IFN- production might also contribute to the different
outcomes observed for GKO and WT allogeneic BMT recipients. IFN-
plays an important role in regulating chemokine production and thereby
directing the tissue infiltration of activated, including
alloantigen-primed, T cells.63-67 Studies using an
immunogenic tumor model demonstrated that the failure of cytolytic
effectors ("tumor-antigen"-specific CD8 T cells) to remain at the
site of the tumor is a major limitation in the ability of CD8 T-cell
responses to control tumor growth.68 Contact-dependent
lysis is also critical for alloreactive CTLs to mediate GVL effects in
allogeneic BMT recipients. It has been reported that IFN-
contributes to alloreactive donor T-cell infiltrates in lymphoid
tissues and lymphoid hypoplasia associated with GVHD,69,70 suggesting that IFN- may direct alloresponses toward the
lymphohematopoietic system rather than the parenchymal GVHD target
tissues. Consistently, the present study showed that GKO donor CD8 T
cells that induce more severe GVHD were less efficient in destroying
host hematopoietic cells compared to WT donor CD8 T cells (Figure 5).
Thus, it is possible that the reduction of GVL effects in mice
receiving IFN- -deficient donor cells reflects a lack of sufficient
contact between donor CD8 T cells and the leukemic cells within the
lymphohematopoietic system in these mice, and that the increased GVHD
is due to increased T-cell migration into the parenchymal GVHD target tissues.
Although the differentiation of cytotoxic CD8 T cells has been shown to
require help from CD4 cells,71,72 the generation of
alloreactive CD8 T cells can also be independent of CD4
help.73,74 The striking increase in GVHD mortality in
recipients of GKO CD8 T cells or 2C cells demonstrates that this
helper-independent CD8 subset is regulated by cell-autonomous IFN-
production. Our previous studies have shown that the GVL effects of
splenic T cells against EL4 can be completely eliminated by depleting
CD8+ splenocytes, but are not affected by depleting
CD4+ cells, indicating that such effects are CD8 dependent
and CD4 independent.20,28 We have now observed that
CD4 CD8 splenocytes are required for
CD8+ cells to mediate an optimal GVL effect. It has
recently been shown that the CD4-independent induction of cytotoxic CD8
T cells against allogeneic tumor cells is dependent on costimulation
and can be inhibited by blocking the interaction of either CD40/CD40L or B7/CD28 between antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and CD8 T
cells.74 However, it is unlikely that the synergistic
effect of CD4 CD8 splenocytes observed in
the present study was mediated by donor APCs included in the
CD4 CD8 cell population, because donor BMCs
that also contain APCs had no such effect (Figures 4 and 6). It is
possible that efficient GVL effects may require the presence of both
large quantities of IFN- and CD8 T cells, and the synergistic
effects of CD4 CD8 splenocytes may reflect
their capacity to produce IFN- . It has been reported that both NK
and NKT cells are potential IFN- producers and play an important
role in regulating alloresponses of T cells.75-77
The present study demonstrated that allogeneic CD8 T cells lacking the
capacity for IFN- production induce more severe GVHD, but less
potent antilymphohematopoietic GVH reactions and antileukemic effects
than WT CD8 T cells. The findings suggest that global suppression of
IFN- production should be avoided in the development of strategies
for controlling GVHD in leukemic patients.
 |
Acknowledgments |
We thank Drs Markus Mapara and Yong-mi Kim for critical reading of
the manuscript and Sharon Titus for her expert secretarial assistance.
 |
Footnotes |
Submitted August 14, 2001; accepted January 25, 2002.
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant RO1 CA79989, American
Cancer Society grant IRG-87-007-13, and American Society for Blood and
Marrow Transplantation/Orphan Medical New Investigator Award.
The publication costs of this
article were defrayed in part by
page charge payment. Therefore,
and solely to indicate this fact,
this article is hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
section 1734.
Reprints: Yong-Guang Yang, Bone Marrow Transplantation
Section, Transplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General
Hospital, MGH East, Bldg 149-5102, 13th St, Boston, MA 02129; e-mail:
yongguang.yang{at}tbrc.mgh.harvard.edu |