Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 17, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0078.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2001-11-0078v1
99/11/4225    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelli, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelli, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 June 2002, Vol. 99, No. 11, pp. 4225-4227

BRIEF REPORT

Relationship of CD8+ T cell noncytotoxic anti-HIV response to CD4+ T cell number in untreated asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals

JoAnn C. Castelli, Steven G. Deeks, Stephen Shiboski, and Jay A. Levy

From the Department of Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

During chronic HIV infection, asymptomatic individuals demonstrate a strong CD8+ cell noncytotoxic antiviral response (CNAR). With the onset of symptoms or reduction in CD4+ cell counts, CNAR decreases. Presently, it is recommended that infected individuals receive antiretroviral therapy if CD4+ cell counts fall below 350 cells/µL. To determine whether CNAR lends support to this recommendation for initiation of antiretroviral treatment, we examined CNAR in 20 healthy, untreated, HIV-infected men exhibiting a range of CD4+ cell numbers. Our results indicate that the asymptomatic untreated HIV-infected individuals with less than 300 CD4+ cells/µL had a significantly lower CNAR than those with higher CD4+ cell counts. These data on CNAR in untreated, healthy, HIV-infected individuals support the current recommendation for when to initiate antiretroviral therapy. (Blood. 2002;99:4225-4227)

© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

In HIV-infected individuals, antiretroviral therapy is recommended when CD4+ cell counts fall below 350 cells/µL, viral load rises above 30 000 copies/mL, or HIV-related symptoms appear.1 Although immunologic responses also decrease during chronic infection, this function has not been used to determine when antiretroviral therapy should be initiated. One of the immunologic responses reduced over time in HIV-infected individuals is the CD8+ cell noncytotoxic antiviral response (CNAR).

CNAR is first observed during the acute stage of HIV infection and then can be maintained for more than 10 years.2 In chronic HIV-infected individuals, the extent of CNAR correlates directly with the clinical state and the CD4+ cell counts.2-7 For example, chronic HIV-infected individuals who are asymptomatic and have more than 500 CD4+ cells/µL have a strong CNAR. Conversely, individuals who are symptomatic and have lower CD4+ cell counts have a significantly weaker CNAR.3,5,6,8 The clinical importance of CNAR is strongly suggested by studies of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus infection in primates. Administration of anti-CD8 antibodies caused a return in virus production in these animals.9-11 The rapid rebound in viremia appears to reflect a noncytotoxic mechanism for control of virus replication.

Our goal was to determine whether CNAR in untreated asymptomatic individuals could provide an immunologic measure that supports the time now recommended to initiate antiretroviral therapy. To address this question, we compared the extent of CNAR in CD8+ cells from 20 randomly selected, untreated, asymptomatic individuals having a broad range of CD4+ cell counts.


    Study design
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

Study subjects

After informed consent, peripheral blood was drawn from a cohort of 20 randomly selected men, chronically infected with HIV, who were clinically healthy and not on therapy. Of the 20 subjects, 2 completed antiretroviral treatment 3 years and 5 years before enrollment, whereas all others were therapy-naive. All subjects contracted HIV through sexual contact and with the exception of one individual (infected 2 years before enrollment), seroconverted more than 10 years before enrollment. Plasma viral loads were measured by the bDNA technique.12 This study received the approval of the Committee for Human Research, University of California, San Francisco.

Cell culture

Blood samples from clinically healthy seronegative and from HIV-1- seropositive subjects were collected by venipuncture. Complete blood counts and T-cell subset identification was assessed from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated blood. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from the heparinized blood by Ficoll gradient separation.13 Cells were cultured at 3 × 106 cells/mL in complete RPMI 1640 medium, containing 10% heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 minutes) fetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL, Rockville, MD), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, and 10% purified human interleukin 2 (IL-2) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

Acute infection assay

From the PBMCs of seronegative individuals, CD4+ cells were obtained by immunomagnetic (IM) bead separation (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA), cultured at 3 × 106 cells/mL in complete medium, and supplemented with 10% purified human IL-2. CD4+ cells were then stimulated with phytohemaglutinin-leucogglutinin (PHA-L) (3 µg/mL) for 3 days at 37°C before being infected with HIV-1. For recovery of CD8+ cells, PBMCs from seropositive subjects were first stimulated with 3 µg/mL PHA-L (Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO) for 3 days.

After 3 days of PHA stimulation, CD8+ cells were isolated from the seropositive PBMC cultures by positive selection with IM beads. The PHA-stimulated CD4+ cells were infected with HIV-1SF33, a beta -chemokine-insensitive, CXCR4-dependent viral isolate, at a titer in which peak reverse transcriptase (RT) activities14 were reached at 7 days in infected CD4+ cells cultured alone.8 CD8+ cells and CD4+ cells were cocultured in duplicate at input CD8+:CD4+ cell ratios ranging from 0.25:1 to 2:1, in complete medium supplemented with 100 U/mL recombinant human IL-2 (generously provided by Glaxo IMB, Geneva, Switzerland). Culture supernatants were monitored for RT activity and percent suppression calculated as described previously.8

Statistical analysis

Exact Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate differences in the distributions of markers of antiviral response for symmetry and the presence of outliers between individuals with CD4+ cell counts of more than or less than 300. Differences were deemed significant if exact P values were less than .05. For analysis purposes, a limit of detection (50 HIV RNA copies/mL) was set for undetectable viral load values.


    Results and discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

Study group characteristics

A comparison of 20 randomly selected subjects showed a distinct division in the range of CD4+ cell counts at more than 481 CD4+ cells/µL (> 300 CD4+ cells/µL) and at less than 300 CD4+ cells/µL (< 300 CD4+ cells/µL) (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of study subjects with different CD4+ cell numbers

CD4+ cell count, CD8+ cell count, and plasma viral loads differed significantly between the 2 groups. The mean CD4+ cell count for those individuals in the group with higher CD4+ cell counts was 629 cells/µL whereas the mean cell number for those individuals in the group with lower CD4+ cell counts was 220 cells/µL (P = .001). CD8+ cell numbers were higher (1605 CD8+ cells/µL) in individuals with higher CD4+ cell counts than in individuals with lower CD4+ cell counts (677 CD8+ cells/µL) (P = .01). Plasma viral load values were lower (4173 HIV RNA copies/mL) in individuals with higher CD4+ cell counts than in individuals with lower CD4+ cell counts (26 314 HIV RNA copies/mL) (P = .03). T-cell subsets and plasma viral load values, obtained at the time CNAR was assessed, are presented in Table 1 as median and range (in parentheses). P values were determined by Wilcoxon rank sum test for paired samples.

Antiviral response

By analyzing suppression of HIV replication as a function of CD4+ cell number, a difference in the extent of suppression was observed in individuals with less than 300 CD4+ cells/µL in comparison to those individuals with higher CD4+ cell counts (Figure 1A).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. CD8+ cell noncytotoxic antiviral response in HIV-infected individuals with different CD4+ cell numbers. CD8+ cells from HIV-seropositive individuals were isolated from PHA-stimulated PBMCs and cocultured at different input cell ratios with PHA-stimulated seronegative CD4+ cells, acutely infected with HIV-1SF33. The ratio of CD8+:CD4+ cells required to reach more than or equal to 90% suppression of HIV replication is indicated for each infected individual (A) within a range of CD4+ cells/µL (open circle ) and (B) after dividing the subjects into 2 groups either with less than (black-triangle) or greater than (black-square) 300 CD4+ cells/µL. Percent suppression is calculated from the amount of RT activity14 in the supernatants of the cocultures of CD8+ and CD4+ cells compared to the RT activity in the supernatants from infected CD4+ cells cultured alone. Solid lines represent the average CD8:CD4+ cell ratio for more than or equal to 90% suppression.

A statistically lower number of CD8+ cells (average cell ratio of 1.1:1) was required to reach 90% suppression of HIV replication in the group with higher CD4+ cell counts than in the group with less than 300 CD4+ cells (average cell ratio of 2.35:1) (P = .01) (Figure 1B). In some subjects with less than 300 CD4+ cells/µL, the CD8+:CD4+ cell input of more than 2:1 in the coculture (Figure 1B) indicated an inability of CNAR to reach 90% suppression at the ratio of 2:1.

There were 2 subjects in the present study who represented exceptions. One showed strong CNAR with CD4+ cell counts below 300 cells/µL. This individual did not have a substantially different CD4+ cell count, CD8+ cell count, or plasma viral load from the other individuals in this group. The other individual had poor CNAR but an exceptionally high CD4+ cell count (1033 cells/µL) and an undetectable viral load. This individual had the highest CD4+ cell count of the cohort along with a higher percentage of CD4+ cells than CD8+ cells. Both individuals seroconverted more than 10 years before enrollment in the study and were antiretroviral therapy-naive.

The past and these present findings suggest that the HIV-infected individual with a strong CNAR, despite the low CD4+ cell count, would remain healthy for a longer time than the individual with a low CNAR and high CD4+ cell count.2,5-8 Other subjects who show similar features need to be followed over time to assess this possibility.

Using an exploratory analysis of the extent of CNAR in association with viral load, we observed a trend between low CNAR and high viral load (data not shown). Nevertheless, the number of subjects in each CD4+ cell number group was too low to conclude statistically a relationship of CNAR to viral load.

The present study of untreated HIV-infected individuals, with no HIV-related symptoms, confirms that the extent of CNAR correlates with CD4+ cell counts. Asymptomatic individuals with CD4+ cell counts below 300 cells/µL showed less ability to suppress HIV replication than those with higher CD4+ cells counts. The findings provide immunologically based evidence supporting the current recommendation for the time to initiate combination antiretroviral therapy.1 The results suggest that CNAR could be an additional marker to help determine the optimal time to begin antiretroviral treatment.


    Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sue Fujimura for her technical assistance.


    Footnotes

Submitted November 28, 2001; accepted January 18, 2002.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 17, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0078.

Supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 AI49926-01). J.C.C. is a trainee under the National Institutes of Health Training Program (T32 AI07395).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Jay A. Levy, UCSF, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143-1270; e-mail: jalevy{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

1. Carpenter CC, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in adults: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2000;283:381-390[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2. Mackewicz CE, Yang LC, Lifson JD, Levy JA. Non-cytolytic CD8 T-cell anti-HIV responses in primary infection. Lancet. 1994;344:1671-1673[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

3. Mackewicz CE, Ortega HW, Levy JA. CD8+ cell anti-HIV activity correlates with the clinical state of the infected individual. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1462-1466[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

4. Walker CM, Moody DJ, Stites DP, Levy JA. CD8+ T lymphocyte control of HIV replication in cultured CD4+ cells varies among infected individuals. Cell Immunol. 1989;119:470-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

5. Landay AL, Mackewicz C, Levy JA. An activated CD8+ T cell phenotype correlates with anti-HIV activity and asymptomatic clinical status. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1993;69:106-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

6. Gomez AM, Smaill FM, Rosenthal KL. Inhibition of HIV replication by CD8+ T cells correlates with CD4 counts and clinical stage of disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1994;97:68-75[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

7. Levy JA, Mackewicz CE, Barker E. Controlling HIV pathogenesis: the role of noncytotoxic anti-HIV activity of CD8+ cells. Immunol Today. 1996;17:217-224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

8. Barker E, Mackewicz CE, Reyes-Teran G, et al. Virological and immunological features of long-term human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals who have remained asymptomatic compared to those who have progressed to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Blood. 1998;92:3105-3114[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Matano T, Shibata R, Siemon C, et al. Administration of an anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody interferes with the clearance of chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus during primary infections of rhesus macaques. J Virol. 1998;72:164-169[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10. Schmitz JE, Kuroda MJ, Santra S, et al. Control of viremia in simian immunodeficiency virus infection by CD8+ lymphocytes. Science. 1999;283:857-860[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11. Castro BA, Homsy J, Lennette E, et al. HIV-1 expression in chimpanzees can be activated by CD8+ cell depletion or CMV infection. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology. 1992;65:227-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

12. Cao Y, Ho DD, Todd J, et al. Clinical evaluation of branched DNA signal amplification for quantifying HIV type 1 in human plasma. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1995;11:353-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

13. Levy JA, Shimabukuro J. Recovery of AIDS-associated retroviruses from patients with AIDS or AIDS-related conditions, and from clinically healthy individuals. J Infect Diseases. 1985;152:734-738[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

14. Hoffman AD, Banapour B, Levy JA. Characterization of the AIDS-associated retrovirus reverse transcriptase and optimal conditions for its detection in virions. Virology. 1985;147:326-335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
V. Dioszeghy, K. Benlhassan-Chahour, B. Delache, N. Dereuddre-Bosquet, C. Aubenque, G. Gras, R. Le Grand, and B. Vaslin
Changes in Soluble Factor-Mediated CD8+ Cell-Derived Antiviral Activity in Cynomolgus Macaques Infected with Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac251: Relationship to Biological Markers of Progression
J. Virol., January 1, 2006; 80(1): 236 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Castelli, E. K. Thomas, M. Gilliet, Y.-J. Liu, and J. A. Levy
Mature dendritic cells can enhance CD8+ cell noncytotoxic anti-HIV responses: the role of IL-15
Blood, April 1, 2004; 103(7): 2699 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. E. Mackewicz, C. S. Craik, and J. A. Levy
The CD8+ cell noncytotoxic anti-HIV response can be blocked by protease inhibitors
PNAS, March 18, 2003; 100(6): 3433 - 3438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2001-11-0078v1
99/11/4225    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelli, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelli, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Brief Reports
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020