| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
PLENARY PAPER
From the City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte,
CA; Dupont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE; University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis; Childrens Hospital Los Angeles; and Keck School
of Medicine, University of Southern California, both of Los Angeles,
CA.
Second malignant neoplasms are a serious complication after
successful treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
With improvement in survival, it is important to assess the impact of
contemporary risk-based therapies on second neoplasms in ALL survivors.
A cohort of 8831 children diagnosed with ALL and enrolled on
Children's Cancer Group therapeutic protocols between 1983 and 1995 were observed to determine the incidence of second neoplasms and
associated risk factors. The median age at diagnosis of ALL was 4.7 years. The cohort had accrued 54 883 person-years of follow-up.
Sixty-three patients developed second neoplasms, including solid,
nonhematopoietic tumors (n = 39: brain tumors n = 19, other solid
tumors n = 20), myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia (n = 16), and
lymphoma (n = 8). The cumulative incidence of any second neoplasm was
1.18% at 10 years (95% confidence interval, 0.8%-1.5%),
representing a 7.2-fold increased risk compared with the general
population. The risk was increased significantly for acute myeloid
leukemia (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 52.3), non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (SIR 8.3), parotid gland tumors (SIR 33.4), thyroid cancer
(SIR 13.3), brain tumors (SIR 10.1), and soft tissue sarcoma (SIR 9.1).
Multivariate analysis revealed female sex (relative risk [RR] 1.8),
radiation to the craniospinal axis (RR 1.6), and relapse of primary
disease (RR 3.5) to be independently associated with increased risk of
all second neoplasms. Risk of second neoplasms increased with radiation
dose (1800 cGy RR 1.5; 2400 cGy RR 3.9). Actuarial survival at 10 years
from diagnosis of second neoplasms was 39%. Follow-up of this large
cohort that was treated with contemporary risk-based therapy showed
that the incidence of second neoplasms remains low after diagnosis of
childhood ALL.
(Blood. 2002;99:4257-4264) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most
common childhood malignancy, with an annual rate of 3 to 4 cases per
100 000 children.1 Population-based data indicate that
children with ALL treated with contemporary therapy have a 5-year
survival rate of 80%.2 With 2500 to 3000 children
diagnosed with ALL annually, we expect approximately 2000 long-term
survivors of childhood ALL each year. Long-term sequelae of treatment,
such as impaired intellectual and psychomotor
functioning,3 neuroendocrine abnormalities,4 impaired reproductive capacity,5-8
cardiotoxicity,9 and second malignant
neoplasms10-17 are being reported with increased frequency in the growing cohort of survivors.
For survivors of childhood ALL, the estimated actuarial risk of
developing a second neoplasm has been reported to be 2.5% at 15 years
from diagnosis.11 Among second neoplasms observed after
treatment of ALL, central nervous system (CNS) tumors in patients
treated with cranial irradiation are the most common. Other commonly
reported second neoplasms in this population include lymphoma, acute
myeloid leukemia (AML), and thyroid
cancer.10,11,13,14,18-31 However, most reports of second
neoplasms are limited by relatively few patients treated on
contemporary risk-based therapeutic protocols and observed for
reasonable lengths of time. To address these concerns, we followed a
cohort of 8831 children who had been treated on 1 of the 12 Children's
Cancer Group (CCG) therapeutic protocols between 1983 and 1995 and had
accrued 54 883 person-years of follow-up. Among 8831 patients, 3599 (41%) had been part of a previous report.11 The follow-up
of these 3599 patients was 6 years (range, 3 to 8 years) at the time of
that report.11 Therefore, this study is an update of the
previous report (increased follow-up to a median of 15 years) and an
extension of the cohort to include 5232 additional patients.
The CCG conducted clinical trials in cooperation with member
institutions throughout the United States and Canada. At the time of
analysis, the group included 122 institutions, which were required to
register all newly diagnosed cancer patients with the operations
office, after which eligible patients were entered into active
therapeutic clinical trials. The operations office was responsible for
determining patient eligibility, randomized assignments to the
appropriate therapeutic arms (if necessary), and follow-up of patients
for all potential outcomes. Member institutions were required to submit
follow-up reports on all patients enrolled in therapeutic protocols.
Those reports included information on survival status, disease status,
and development of second malignancies for all patients. The follow-up
reports are submitted annually for as long as patients live.
Our cohort consisted of 8831 children with newly diagnosed ALL who were
younger than 21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled in 1 of the 12 therapeutic protocols for untreated ALL conducted by CCG between 1983 and 1995. These twelve protocols were CCG-104, -105, -106, -107, -123, -139, -1881, -1882, -1883, -1891, -1901, and -1922. Informed consent
was obtained from patients, parents, or guardians at the time of
enrollment. The patients were randomized to 1 of 2 or more therapeutic
schedules of chemotherapy or radiation. The total length of therapy
ranged from 2 to 3 years. Clinical results of many of the trials, with
the therapeutic plans, have been published.32-42
For each protocol, a therapeutic summary was prepared that included the
dose of radiation therapy (and assigned fields) and chemotherapeutic
exposures. Assigned cumulative doses were calculated for
cyclophosphamide and the anthracyclines (daunomycin and
doxorubicin). The total assigned cumulative doses ranged from 0 to
16 200 (females) and 24 000 (males) mg/m2 of body surface
area for cyclophosphamide and from 0 to 500 mg/m2 of body
surface area for anthracyclines. Assigned radiation doses ranged from 0 to 1800 cGy to the cranium (for CNS prophylaxis) and 2400 cGy to the
cranium and 600 to 1200 cGy to the spine (for treatment of CNS
disease). The authors reviewed the records of patients with second
neoplasms to assess the actual doses of chemotherapeutic agents given
to them. Most patients received more than 95% of their prescribed
doses of parenteral chemotherapeutic agents. The actual doses given to
the patients of oral drugs such as methotrexate and 6-MP were lower
(73%), but exposure to oral antimetabolites was not evaluated in our analyses.
Patients also were categorized into "early" and "recent"
treatment eras. The early treatment era corresponded to the period when
patients were treated according to 1 of 6 therapeutic protocols open
between 1983 and 1989 (CCG-104, -105, -106, -107, -123, and -139 [n = 3713]). The recent treatment era corresponded to the period
when patients were treated according to the remaining 6 therapeutic
protocols open between 1989 and 1995 (CCG-1881, -1882, -1883, -1891, -1901, and -1922 [n = 5118]).
For patients in whom second neoplasms developed, date of diagnosis,
histologic characteristics, and tumor site were recorded. Pathology
reports were obtained from treating institutions and reviewed to verify diagnoses.
The time at risk for second neoplasms was computed from the date of
diagnosis of ALL to the date of diagnosis of second neoplasm, date of
death, or date of last contact, whichever came first. The end of
follow-up for the study was December 1999. Overall and event-free
survival was calculated using actuarial methods. Cumulative incidence
of second malignancy over time was calculated using competing risk
methods. To estimate the risk of second neoplasms, the number of
person-years of observation were compiled for subgroups of the cohort,
defined by age and sex. Rates of incidence of cancer (obtained from the
registry of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the
National Institutes of Health2) were used to calculate the
expected number of cases of cancer. Standardized incidence ratios
(SIRs) were calculated as the ratios of observed to expected cases. Cox
regression techniques were used for calculating relative risk (RR)
estimates.43 Variables examined in the regression model
included age at diagnosis, sex, cumulative cyclophosphamide and
anthracycline doses, and radiation dose delivered to the craniospinal
axis. Age at diagnosis of ALL was analyzed as a categorical variable
(less than or equal to 5 years vs more than 5 years). Exposures to
cyclophosphamide and anthracyclines also were analyzed as categorical
variables (cyclophosphamide dose 0 mg/m2, 1-2000 mg/m2, and more than 2000 mg/m2; anthracyclines
0 mg/m2, 1-200 mg/m2, and more than 200 mg/m2). Epipodophyllotoxins were not used in any of the CCG
therapeutic protocols. Although all patients in our cohort were treated
according to therapeutic protocols, we did not have information
regarding the treatment received by patients in the event of relapse,
which potentially could have influenced development of second
malignancies. Therefore, we included relapse of primary disease as a
variable in the multivariate analysis. All tests of statistical
significance were 2-sided.
Excess absolute risk was calculated as an additional indicator of
impact of cancer diagnosis and therapy on the cohort when compared with
the general population. Excess absolute risk was determined by
subtracting the expected number of malignancies in the cohort from the
observed number, dividing the difference by person-years of follow-up,
and multiplying that value by 10 000.
The cohort was observed for a median of 5.5 years (range, 0 to
16.1 years). During the study, there was documented contact with 90%
of patients within the previous 5 years and 78% within the previous
2 years. The estimated overall survival at 9 years was
76.9% ± 0.5%, and the event-free survival was
67.2% ± 0.6%. Sixty-three patients developed second neoplasms,
including 39 patients with solid, nonhematopoietic tumors, 16 with
acute and chronic myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia (MDS), 6 with
non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 2 with Hodgkin disease. Characteristics
of the patient population and treatment received are
summarized in Table 1. The
median length of follow-up among the patients who survive second
cancers is 3 years (range, 0 to 12 years).
Figure 1 shows the cumulative incidence
of all second neoplasms, AMLs, all solid cancers, and brain tumors. The
cumulative incidence of any second malignant neoplasm was 1.18% (95%
confidence interval [CI], 0.8%-1.5%) at 10 years from diagnosis of
ALL and rose to 2.08% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.8%) at 15 years. Most of this
risk was from solid nonhematopoietic malignancies including brain
tumors (cumulative incidence 0.82% at 10 years). Among patients who
remained in first continued remission, the cumulative incidence of any second malignancy was 0.91% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.2%) at 10 years from diagnosis. The cumulative incidence by type of second malignancy for
the entire cohort and for those in first continued remission is shown
in Table 2.
At the time of analysis, the cohort had accrued 54 883 person-years of
follow-up. The number of observed and expected second neoplasms,
calculated on the basis of age- and sex-specific rates for all cancers
and various groupings of cancers, are shown in Table
3. Overall, a total of 8.5 neoplasms
would have been expected, and 61 (excluding the 2 patients with
meningioma) were observed (SIR 7.2; 95% CI, 5.5-9.1). In addition,
significantly elevated risks were observed for AML or MDS
(AML/MDS) (SIR 52.3), NHL (SIR 8.3), brain tumors (SIR
10.1), soft tissue sarcoma (SIR 9.1), thyroid cancer (SIR 13.3), and
parotid gland tumors (SIR = 33.4). The absolute risk for all
cancers was 9.6 cases per 10 000 patients per year and ranged from 0.2 cases per 10 000 patients per year for Hodgkin disease to 2.8 cases
for brain tumors (Table 3).
We also estimated the SIR of second neoplasms according to period of
observation (ie, the interval from first treatment to diagnosis of
second neoplasm) (Table 4). The SIR was
highest during the first 10 years of follow-up and declined thereafter. This phenomenon is consistent with the increase in the expected incidence of cancer with increasing age. For leukemia, the excess risk
appeared within the first 5 years of treatment and declined over the
next 5 years. No cases of leukemia were observed beyond 10 years after
diagnosis of ALL.
Twenty-one of 63 second malignancies developed among patients who had
relapses of their original diseases before diagnosis of second
malignancy. The records of patients who developed relapses of their
original diseases before development of second neoplasms were reviewed
for details of the treatment given to them. However, the records did
not include details of doses and durations of therapy received for
relapses; hence, it was difficult to include postrelapse therapeutic
exposures in the analyses. Because detailed information on therapy
after relapse of ALL was not available at the time of this analysis,
presence of relapse was included as a variable in the multivariate
analysis (Table 5). Multivariate analysis
found female sex (RR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8), radiation to the
craniospinal axis (RR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.6), and relapse of primary
disease (RR 3.5; 95% CI, 2.1-5.8) to be independently associated with
increased risk of all second neoplasms. Risk of second neoplasms
increased with radiation dose (1800 cGy: RR 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.6; and
2400 cGy: RR 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-11.2).
Solid cancers Solid nonhematopoietic cancers developed in 39 patients and included 19 with brain tumors; 4 each with thyroid cancer, parotid gland tumors, and soft tissue sarcoma; 2 each with malignant melanoma, colon cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma; and 1 each with breast and ovarian cancer. The cumulative incidence of a second solid nonhematopoietic malignancy was 0.82% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.1%) at 10 years (Figure 1; Table 2) and rose to 1.55% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.2%) at 15 years from diagnosis of ALL. The median time to development of second solid malignancies was 7.1 years (range, 1.1-15.8 years). Multivariate analysis revealed relapse of primary disease (RR 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.1), female sex (RR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.8), and exposure to radiation (RR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.5) to be independently associated with an increased risk of a second solid malignancy (Table 5). The risk increased with increasing dose of radiation (1800 cGy: RR 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.6; and 2400 cGy: RR 5.8; 95% CI, 1.3-25.3). Seventy-five percent of solid tumors developed within radiation fields. Seventeen of 39 patients with solid malignancies have died at the time of this report.Brain tumors. Brain tumors developed in 19 patients and included 9 with glioblastoma multiforme, 4 with anaplastic astrocytoma, 3 with primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the brain, 2 with meningioma, and 1 with medulloblastoma. The median age at diagnosis of ALL for these 19 patients was 3.8 years, and the median time to development of brain tumors was 7.1 years. The cumulative incidence of brain tumors approached 0.47% (95% CI, 0.2-0.6) at 10 years (Figure 1), and the cohort was at a 10-fold increased risk for developing brain tumors when compared with the general population. Multivariate analysis revealed radiation to the craniospinal axis (RR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.2) to be associated with increased risk of brain tumors after ALL (Table 5). Age at diagnosis of ALL was not identified as a significant risk factor. Eleven of 19 patients with brain tumors have died. Soft tissue sarcoma. Soft tissue sarcoma developed in 4 patients. These included rhabdomyosarcoma involving the eye, uterus (embryonal), and urinary bladder (undifferentiated) in 1 patient each and a high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the pelvis in the fourth patient. The patient with the uterine rhabdomyosarcoma had received total body irradiation for unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation before development of rhabdomyosarcoma. Two other patients received prophylactic radiation to the brain, but sarcomas developed outside the radiation fields. The fourth patient did not receive radiation therapy. The median time to development of secondary sarcoma was 3.6 years (range, 2.4 to 5.6 years). The cohort was at a 9.1-fold increased risk for developing soft tissue sarcoma compared with the general population. All 4 patients were females, with a significantly increased risk of developing sarcomas among the female compared with male cohort (P = .02). No other host or therapy-related risk factors were identified. Three of 4 patients with soft tissue sarcoma have died. Parotid gland tumors. Mucoepidermoid tumors of the parotid gland developed in 4 patients. This cohort was at a 33.4 times increased risk for developing a parotid gland tumor compared with the general population. The median time to development of those tumors was 8.9 years (range, 5.2 to 15.8 years), and no risk factors were identified. All 4 patients were alive at the time of this report. Thyroid cancer. Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland developed in 4 patients at a median of 9.7 years (range, 5.5 to 11.8 years) from diagnosis of ALL. The cohort was at a 13.3-fold increased risk for development of secondary thyroid cancers when compared with the general population. Exposure to 2400 cGy of radiation was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing thyroid cancer (RR 30.8; 95% CI, 1.2-62.9). All 4 patients with thyroid cancer were alive at the time of this report. Leukemia Secondary leukemia developed in 16 patients. Fourteen developed AML/MDS, 1 developed chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 1 was diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Marker studies were very carefully reviewed to determine that the secondary leukemias were true second neoplasms and not relapses of original diseases. Of 14 patients with AML/MDS, 10 were characterized morphologically with AML (M0 [n = 1], M1 [n = 4], M2 [n = 2], M4 [n = 1], M5 [n = 1], M6 [n = 1]), 3 had morphologic features of MDS, and 1 developed myelofibrosis. The median time to development of AML/MDS was 3.1 years (range, 0.9-10.7 years) from diagnosis of ALL. The cumulative incidence of developing AML/MDS approached 0.21% (95% CI, 0.1-0.3) at 10 years, with 13 of 14 events reported in the first 5 years and no events reported after 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Exposure to cyclophosphamide or anthracyclines was not identified as a significant risk factor for the development of AML/MDS (Table 5). However, patients with relapses of their primary diseases were at significantly higher risk for developing secondary AML/MDS (RR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) (Table 5). Twelve of 14 patients with secondary AML/MDS have died.Lymphoma NHL developed in 6 patients, including 1 with Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease. The median time to the development of NHL was 3.1 years (range, 1.5-2.7 years). The cumulative incidence of secondary NHL reached 0.08% (95% CI, 0.01-0.2) at 10 years from diagnosis of ALL (Figure 1). The cohort was at an 8-fold increased risk for developing a lymphoma when compared with the general population.Hodgkin disease developed in 2 patients within the first 3 years of follow-up. The cohort was at a 2.7-fold increased risk for developing Hodgkin disease, but that risk was not statistically significant when compared with the general population. Both patients with Hodgkin disease were alive at the time of this report. Treatment eras A comparison of the patient characteristics, therapeutic exposures, treatment outcomes, and second malignancies is summarized in Table 6. Patients treated in the early treatment era were observed for a median of 10.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.1 years). The cumulative incidence of second neoplasms among patients treated in the early era approached 0.94% (95% CI, 0.6%-1.3%) at 10 years and 1.84% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%) at 15 years.
Despite a significantly larger proportion of patients exposed to chemotherapeutic agents and a smaller proportion of patients exposed to prophylactic cranial irradiation in the recent era, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of second neoplasms in the first 5 years of follow-up in the 2 treatment eras (Table 6).
Among the 8831 patients who were treated for childhood ALL since 1983 on CCG therapeutic protocols, we found the cumulative incidence of second malignancies to be low (1.18% at 10 years after the initial diagnosis). However, this report provides evidence that the risk of a second neoplasm is increased 7-fold among long-term survivors of childhood ALL when compared with the age- and sex-matched general population. The risk was highest among patients who had suffered a relapse of their primary disease, among patients who had received radiation therapy, and among females, with the sex preference primarily accounted for by secondary soft tissue sarcoma. ALL is the most common malignancy in childhood and is associated with excellent outcomes, resulting in an increasing population of long-term survivors, so attention is being focused on potential therapy-related long-term complications such as second neoplasms.10-17,44-46 In a CCG report of 9720 patients diagnosed between 1972 and 1988 and observed for a median of 4.7 years, Neglia et al estimated a 2.5% cumulative risk of second neoplasms 15 years after diagnosis of ALL.11 Similarly, Dalton et al reported a cumulative risk of second neoplasms of 2.7% in a cohort of 1597 patients diagnosed between 1972 and 1995 who were treated according to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute protocols and observed for a median of 7.6 years.14 A population-based study of 981 children with ALL from the Nordic countries reported a cumulative risk of second neoplasms of 2.9% at 20 years from diagnosis.44 Pratt et al estimated an 8% cumulative risk 15 years after diagnosis in a group of 1815 patients, diagnosed and treated on one of the St Jude protocols between 1962 to 1988, all of whom had received radiation.45 Recently, Loning et al reported a cumulative risk of 3.3% at 15 years in a cohort of 5006 patients enrolled in 5 ALL-Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster trials between 1979 and 1995 and followed for a median of 5.7 years.10 Intrathecal chemotherapy can be effective in selected patient populations as prophylaxis against CNS leukemia47,48; therefore, radiation therapy now tends to be used primarily for children with CNS disease at diagnosis or with characteristics that indicate a high risk of CNS disease. On the other hand, chemotherapy regimens are considerably more intensive than those used in previous cohorts. Thus, our cohort of patients treated more recently and more aggressively with chemotherapy, yet more conservatively with radiation therapy, allows for assessment of incidence of second cancers in a cohort of patients who received contemporary, risk-based therapy. Nineteen patients with brain tumors were identified in this cohort, with the cumulative incidence of brain tumors approaching 0.5% at 10 years from diagnosis of ALL. An increased risk of brain tumors has been observed among long-term survivors of childhood ALL.10,11,14,19,23-31,49 Similar to previous studies, brain tumors were more likely to develop among patients who had received radiation, and the risk increased with increasing radiation dose.10,11,14 Previous studies reported increased risk of brain tumors among patients who were less than 5 years old at the time of radiation.10,11,14,16 Thirteen of the 19 secondary brain tumors in our study developed among patients who were less than 5 years old at the time of diagnosis of ALL, but the risk of developing a secondary brain tumor did not differ statistically in the 2 age categories. An unusually high incidence of secondary brain tumors was reported among children treated on a therapeutic protocol at St Jude Children's Research Hospital.28 The St Jude protocol differed from previous protocols in that more intensive systemic antimetabolite therapy was given before and during radiotherapy. An assessment of clinical, biologic, and pharmacokinetic features revealed higher erythrocyte concentrations of thioguanine nucleotide metabolites and a higher proportion of defective thiopurine methyl transferase phenotype among patients with brain tumors compared with those without brain tumors, indicating that underlying genetic characteristics and treatment variables may contribute to the excess of brain tumors in this population. The patients in our cohort were at a 9-fold increased risk for developing soft tissue sarcoma when compared with the general population. There was no correlation with therapeutic exposures, but the risk was significantly increased among females. Brain tumor, sarcoma, and leukemia are part of the familial Li-Fraumeni syndrome.50 Epidemiologic studies have shown that families with members who have brain tumors have increased incidence of leukemia.51 A recent report by Hisada et al shows that, compared with the general population, members of Li-Fraumeni syndrome families have an exceptionally high risk of developing multiple cancers.52 The excess risk of additional primary cancers is mainly for cancers that are characteristic of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, with the highest risk observed for survivors of childhood cancer. It is possible that there is an interaction between genetic susceptibility and radiation, resulting in a subpopulation at increased risk for developing brain tumor and soft tissue sarcoma that needs to be explored further. Unfortunately, information on family history of cancer was not available for this cohort of patients. Case reports of parotid gland tumors as second malignancies after treatment of childhood ALL have been described,53 with patients presenting with painless swelling 6 to 7 years after treatment for ALL. Our cohort was at a 33-fold increased risk for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland, which developed a median of 9 years from diagnosis of ALL, and all 4 patients were alive at the time of this report. There are several case reports of thyroid carcinoma after treatment for ALL with prophylactic cranial irradiation, total body irradiation and, in one report, with chemotherapy alone.54-58 The reports indicate that thyroid cancer develops 12 to 13 years after treatment, the risk is highest in younger children, and the secondary thyroid cancer is associated with an excellent long-term outcome. Four patients developed papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in our cohort at a median of 9.7 years from treatment, placing this patient population at a 13-fold increased risk when compared with the general population. Radiation to the craniospinal axis was associated with an increased risk, and all 4 patients were alive at the time of this report, indicating that after cranial irradiation patients require long-term clinical monitoring of the thyroid and cervical areas for nodules. We found that, after a relatively short latent period (0.9 years), the cumulative incidence of secondary AML/MDS rose sharply, but it appeared to reach a plateau after 5.5 years, with a median time to development of secondary AML/MDS of 3.1 years. This is consistent with data from other studies.59,60 Pui et al reported the risk of epipodophyllotoxin-related secondary AML in patients with ALL to be 3.8% at 6 years.13 They also demonstrated that the risk of epipodophyllotoxin-related AML depends largely on the schedule of drug administration. The cumulative incidence of secondary AML of 0.2% in our cohort is much lower than that reported by Pui et al, in part because epipodophyllotoxins were not used in any of the therapeutic protocols used in this cohort of patients. Hodgkin disease15,61,62 and NHL11,15 as second neoplasms have been reported in previous studies. In our cohort, the risks of developing secondary Hodgkin disease and NHL were increased 3-fold and 8-fold, respectively, compared with the general population. Comparison of the 2 treatment eras (1983-1989 vs 1989-1995) showed that a significantly larger proportion treated in the recent era received anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide. Patients treated in the early era were more likely to have received prophylactic cranial radiation compared with those treated in the recent era. Despite these differences in exposure, there is no statistically significant difference in the incidence of second malignancies in the 2 eras within the first 5 years of follow-up. The median length of follow-up was shorter for the recent era (4.6 years vs 10.3 years for the early era) and so may not allow a meaningful comparison of late-occurring malignancies such as brain tumors and other solid cancers typically associated with radiation. However, secondary AML typically has a short latency period, with most events within the first 4 to 7 years and relatively few events described after the first decade. Therefore, in our cohort, we can say that incidence of secondary AML appears comparable in the 2 treatment eras and has remained constant over the last 15 years. This study has many strengths. First, the large number of patients treated between 1983 and 1995 allowed us to describe the incidence of second malignant neoplasms among patients treated on contemporary therapeutic protocols. Second, treatment of patients according to CCG therapeutic protocols ensured uniform access to standard therapy, giving us the opportunity to explore risk factors associated with second malignant neoplasms identified in this cohort. Several limitations to our report also need to be discussed. Although all the patients in our cohort were treated according to therapeutic protocols, we do not have detailed information regarding actual doses of therapeutic exposures given to patients for relapses, which potentially could have influenced the development of second malignancies. Therefore, we included history of relapse as a variable in the multivariate analysis to serve as a surrogate marker for further therapy received. Relapse of primary disease was associated with increased risk of all second neoplasms, AML/MDS, and all solid tumors. Another limitation of this study was the relatively short overall follow-up period for this cohort, the median length of follow-up of this cohort being 5.5 years. However, the cohort has contributed 54 883 person-years of observation. In addition, 3713 patients from the early era were observed for a median of 10.3 years, contributing 31 558 person-years of observation. The cumulative incidence of second neoplasms developing among patients treated in the early era approached 0.9% at 10 years from diagnosis and represents a fairly accurate estimate of the incidence of second neoplasms among patients treated on contemporary risk-based therapy. However, although most previous studies reported a median follow-up ranging from 4.6 years11 to 7.6 years,14 we anticipate that longer follow-up will likely result in identification of more second neoplasms, especially those associated with radiation therapy, such as brain tumors. Furthermore, longer follow-up of the recent era will give us a more accurate estimate of the impact of the conservative use of prophylactic radiation on the incidence of radiation-associated second malignancies. The current therapeutic approach to childhood ALL is risk stratification, with aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy reserved for patients considered at high risk for relapses and adverse outcomes. Follow-up of this large cohort shows that, with contemporary risk-based therapies, the incidence rate of second neoplasms remains low throughout the first decade after diagnosis of childhood ALL, although it is higher than expected in the general population.
Submitted June 20, 2001; accepted February 19, 2002.
Supported in part by 5 U10 CA13539-26S2.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: S. Bhatia, Children's Oncology Group, PO Box 60012, Arcadia, CA 91006-0012; e-mail: sbhatia{at}coh.org; cc: smason{at}childrensoncologygroup.org.
1. Gurney JG, Severson RK, Davis S, Robison LL. Incidence of cancer in children in the United States: sex-, race-, and 1-year age-specific rates by histologic type. Cancer. 1995;75:2186-2195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Reis LAG,Eisner MP,Kosary CL,,et al eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1998, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD: NCI; 2001. 3. Brouwers P, Poplack O. Memory and learning sequelae in long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: association with attention deficits. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1990;12:174-181. 4. Fisher J, Aur R. Endocrine assessment in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 1982;49:145-151. 5. Pasqualini T, Escobar ME, Domene H, Muriel FS, Pavlovsky S, Rivarola MA. Evaluation of gonadal function following long-term treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in girls. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1987;9:15-22. 6. Blatt J, Poplack D, Sherins R. Testicular function in boys following chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:1121-1124[Abstract]. 7. Quigley C, Cowell C, Jimenez M, et al. Normal or early development of puberty despite gonadal damage in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:143-151[Abstract].
8.
Hamre MR, Robison LL, Nesbit ME, et al.
Effects of radiation on ovarian function in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Study Group.
J Clin Oncol.
1987;5:1759-1765 9. Lipshultz SE, Colan SD, Gelber RD, Perez-Atayde AR, Sallan SE, Sanders SP. Late cardiac effects of doxorubicin therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:808-815[Abstract].
10.
Loning L, Zimmermann M, Reiter A, et al.
Secondary neoplasms subsequent to Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood: significantly lower risk without cranial therapy.
Blood.
2000;95:2770-2775 11. Neglia JP, Meadows AT, Robison LL, et al. Second neoplasms after acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1330-1336[Abstract].
12.
Mosijczuk AD, Ruymann FB.
Second malignancy in acute lymphocytic leukemia.
Am J Dis Child.
1981;135:313-316 13. Pui CH, Behm FG, Raimondi SC, et al. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia in children treated for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:136-142[Abstract]. 14. Dalton VMK, Gelber RD, Li F, Donnelly MJ, Tarbell NJ, Sallan SE. Second malignancies in patients treated for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2848-2853[Abstract]. 15. Zarrabi MH, Rosner F, Grunwald HW. Second neoplasms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1983;52:1712-1719[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Walter AW, Hancock ML, Pui C-H, et al.
Secondary brain tumors in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.
J Clin Oncol.
1998;16:3761-3767 17. Shapiro S, Mealey J. Late anaplastic gliomas in children previously treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Neurosci. 1989;15:176-180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Mike V, Meadows AT, D'Angio GJ. Incidence of second malignant neoplasm in children: results of an international study. Lancet. 1982;2:1326-1331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Hawkins MM, Draper GJ, Kingston JE. Incidence of second primary tumour among childhood cancer survivors. Br J Cancer. 1987;56:339-347[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Rosso P, Terracini B, Fears TR, et al. Second malignant tumors after elective end of therapy for a first cancer in childhood: a multicenter study in Italy. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:451-456[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Green DM, Zevon MA, Reese PA, et al. Second malignant tumors following treatment during childhood and adolescence for cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1994;22:1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Tucker MA, D'Angio GJ, Boice JD Jr, et al. Bone sarcomas linked to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in children. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:588-593[Abstract]. 23. Malone M, Lumley H, Erdohazi M. Astrocytoma as a second malignancy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1986;57:1979-1985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. Fontana M, Stanton C, Pompili A, et al. Late multifocal gliomas in adolescents previously treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1987;60:1510-1518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 25. Rimm IJ, Li FC, Tarbell NJ, Winston KR, Sallan SE. Brain tumors after cranial irradiation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A 13-year experience from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Children's Hospital. Cancer. 1987;59:1506-1508[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Judge MR, Eden OB, O'Neill P.
Cerebral glioma after cranial prophylaxis for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Br Med J.
1984;289:1038-1039 27. Vowels MR, Tobias V, Mameghan H. Second intracranial neoplasms following treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Paediatr Child Health. 1991;27:43-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 28. Relling MV, Rubnitz JE, Rivera GK, et al. High incidence of secondary brain tumors after radiotherapy and antimetabolites. Lancet. 1999;354:34-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 29. Jenkinson H, Hawkins M. Secondary brain tumors in children with ALL. Lancet. 1999;354:1126[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 30. Stanulla M, Loning L, Welte K, Schrappe M. Secondary brain tumors in children with ALL. Lancet. 1999;354:1126-1127[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
Stein ME, Drumea K, Guilbord JN, Ben-Itzhak O, Kuten A.
Case report: late aggressive meningioma following prophylactic cranial irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Br J Radiol.
1995;68:1123-1125 32. Hutchinson RJ, Neerhout RC, Bertolone S. Should therapy be intensified for patients with good risk ALL? [abstract]. Blood. 1996;88:668a. 33. Lange B, Sather H, Weetman R, et al. Double delayed intensification improves outcome in moderate risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a Children's Cancer Group study, CCG-1891 [abstract]. Blood. 1997;90:559a. 34. Uckun FM, Reaman G, Steinherez PG, et al. Improved outcome for children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia after contemporary chemotherapy: a Children's Cancer Group study. Leuk Lymphoma. 1996;24:57-70[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
35.
Uckun FM, Gaynon PS, Sensel MG, et al.
Clinical features and treatment outcome of childhood T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia according to the apparent maturational stage of T-lineage leukemic blasts: a Children's Cancer Group study.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;15:2214-2221
36.
Uckun FM, Sensel MG, Sun L, et al.
Biology and treatment of childhood T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
1998;91:735-746 37. Bostrom B, Gaynon P, Sather H. Dexamethasone (DEX) decreases central nervous system (CNS) relapse and improves event-free survival (EFS) in lower risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1998;17:527a.
38.
Reaman GH, Sposto R, Sensel MG, et al.
Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on two consecutive trials of the Children's Cancer Group.
J Clin Oncol.
1999;17:445-455
39.
Nachman JB, Sather HN, Sensel MG, et al.
Augmented post-induction therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and a slow response to initial therapy.
N Engl J Med.
1998;338:1663-1671 40. Nachman J, Sather HN, Cherlow JM, et al. Response of children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with and without cranial irradiation: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:920-930[Abstract]. 41. Steinherz PG, Gaynon PS, Breneman JC, et al. Treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with bulky extramedullary disease and T-cell phenotype or other poor prognostic features: randomized controlled trial from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer. 1998;82:600-612[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
42.
Nachman J, Sather HN, Gaynon PS, Lukens JN, Wolff L, Trigg ME.
Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster therapy abrogates the adverse prognostic significance of slow early response to induction chemotherapy for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and unfavorable presenting features: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.
J Clin Oncol.
1997;15:2222-2230 43. Kelsey JL, Thomson WD, Evans AS. Retrospective Cohort Studies Methods in Observational Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986:128-147. 44. Nygaard R, Garwicz S, Haldorsen T, et al. Second malignant neoplasms in patients treated for childhood leukemia. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991;80:1220-1228[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 45. Pratt CB, George SL, Hannock ML, Hustu HO, Kun LE, Ochs JS. Second malignant neoplasms in survivors of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. Pediatr Res. 1988;23(suppl):345a.
46.
Neglia JP, Friedman DL, Yasui Y, et al.
Second malignant neoplasms in five-year survivors of childhood cancer: childhood cancer survivor study.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2001;93:618-629
47.
Sullivan MP, Chen T, Dyment PG, Hvizdala E, Steuber CP.
Equivalence of intrathecal chemotherapy and radiotherapy as central nervous system prophylaxis in children with acute leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.
Blood.
1982;60:948-958 48. Littman P, Coccia P, Bleyer WA, et al. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in children with low risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13:1443-1449[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 49. Brustle O, Ohgaki H, Schmitt HP, Walter GF, Ostertag H, Kleihues P. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors after prophylactic central nervous system irradiation in children: association with an activated K-ras gene. Cancer. 1992;69:2385-2392[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
50.
Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, et al.
Germline p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms.
Science.
1990;250:1233-1238 51. Farwell J, Flannery J. Cancer in relatives of children with central nervous system neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:749-753[Abstract].
52.
Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, Fraumeni JF Jr, Li FP.
Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1998;90:606-611 53. Prasannan L, Pu A, Hoff P, Weatherly R, Castle V. Parotid carcinoma as a second malignancy after treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999;21:535-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 54. Perel Y, Leverger G, Carrere A, et al. Second thyroid neoplasms after prophylactic cranial irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 1998;59:91-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 55. Kuefer MU, Moinuddin M, Heideman RL, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: demographics, treatment, and outcome in eleven pediatric patients treated at a single institution. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997;28:433-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
56.
Uderzo C, van Lint MT, Rovelli A, et al.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma after total body irradiation.
Arch Dis Child.
1994;71:256-258 57. Hosoya R, Eiraku K, Saiki S, Nishimura K. Thyroid carcinoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. Cancer. 1983;15:1931-1933. 58. Tang TT, Holcenberg JS, Duck SC, Hodach AE, Oechler HW, Camitta BM. Thyroid carcinoma following treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1981;46:1572-1576.
59.
Bhatia S, Robison LL, Oberlin O, et al.
Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease.
N Engl J Med.
1996;334:745-751 60. Blayney DW, Longo DL, Young RC, et al. Decreasing risk of leukemia with prolonged follow-up after chemotherapy and radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:710-714[Abstract]. 61. Peeters MA, Smith C, Saunders EF. Secondary Hodgkin's disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1986;14:230-233[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 62. Labotka RJ, Sotelo-Avila C, Hruby MA. Hodgkin's disease in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1983;52:846-850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
K. Schmiegelow, I. Al-Modhwahi, M. K. Andersen, M. Behrendtz, E. Forestier, H. Hasle, M. Heyman, J. Kristinsson, J. Nersting, R. Nygaard, et al. Methotrexate/6-mercaptopurine maintenance therapy influences the risk of a second malignant neoplasm after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the NOPHO ALL-92 study Blood, June 11, 2009; 113(24): 6077 - 6084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Meadows, D. L. Friedman, J. P. Neglia, A. C. Mertens, S. S. Donaldson, M. Stovall, S. Hammond, Y. Yasui, and P. D. Inskip Second Neoplasms in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Findings From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2009; 27(14): 2356 - 2362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hudson, D. A. Mulrooney, D. C. Bowers, C. A. Sklar, D. M. Green, S. S. Donaldson, K. C. Oeffinger, J. P. Neglia, A. T. Meadows, and L. L. Robison High-Risk Populations Identified in Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Investigations: Implications for Risk-Based Surveillance J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2009; 27(14): 2405 - 2414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Rizzo, R. E. Curtis, G. Socie, K. A. Sobocinski, E. Gilbert, O. Landgren, L. B. Travis, W. D. Travis, M. E. D. Flowers, D. L. Friedman, et al. Solid cancers after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation Blood, January 29, 2009; 113(5): 1175 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Banerjee, E. Paakko, M. Harila, R. Herva, J. Tuominen, A. Koivula, M. Lanning, and A. Harila-Saari Radiation-induced meningiomas: A shadow in the success story of childhood leukemia Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2009; 11(5): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Carter, W. Landier, A. Schad, A. Moser, A. Schaible, C. Hanby, S. Kurian, F. L. Wong, D. Villaluna, and S. Bhatia Successful Coordination and Execution of Nontherapeutic Studies in a Cooperative Group Setting: Lessons Learned from Children's Oncology Group Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1665 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mody, S. Li, D. C. Dover, S. Sallan, W. Leisenring, K. C. Oeffinger, Y. Yasui, L. L. Robison, and J. P. Neglia Twenty-five-year follow-up among survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5515 - 5523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Barry, L. M. Vrooman, S. E. Dahlberg, D. S. Neuberg, B. L. Asselin, U. H. Athale, L. A. Clavell, E. C. Larsen, A. Moghrabi, Y. Samson, et al. Absence of Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Children With High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Dexrazoxane J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1106 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Friedman, A. Rovo, W. Leisenring, A. Locasciulli, M. E. D. Flowers, A. Tichelli, J. E. Sanders, H. J. Deeg, and G. Socie Increased risk of breast cancer among survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a report from the FHCRC and the EBMT-Late Effect Working Party Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 939 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stanulla, C. Dynybil, D. B. Bartels, M. Dordelmann, L. Loning, A. Claviez, and M. Schrappe The NQO1 C609T polymorphism is associated with risk of secondary malignant neoplasms after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a matched-pair analysis from the ALL-BFM study group Haematologica, November 1, 2007; 92(11): 1581 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Armstrong, C. A. Sklar, M. M. Hudson, and L. L. Robison Long-Term Health Status Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Does Sex Matter? J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 25(28): 4477 - 4489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maule, G. Scelo, G. Pastore, P. Brennan, K. Hemminki, E. Tracey, R. Sankila, E. Weiderpass, J. H. Olsen, M. L. McBride, et al. Risk of Second Malignant Neoplasms After Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma: An International Study J Natl Cancer Inst, May 16, 2007; 99(10): 790 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hijiya, M. M. Hudson, S. Lensing, M. Zacher, M. Onciu, F. G. Behm, B. I. Razzouk, R. C. Ribeiro, J. E. Rubnitz, J. T. Sandlund, et al. Cumulative Incidence of Secondary Neoplasms as a First Event After Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia JAMA, March 21, 2007; 297(11): 1207 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bhatia, M. D. Krailo, Z. Chen, L. Burden, F. B. Askin, P. S. Dickman, H. E. Grier, M. P. Link, P. A. Meyers, E. J. Perlman, et al. Therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia after Ewing sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone: a report from the Children's Oncology Group Blood, January 1, 2007; 109(1): 46 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Neglia, L. L. Robison, M. Stovall, Y. Liu, R. J. Packer, S. Hammond, Y. Yasui, C. E. Kasper, A. C. Mertens, S. S. Donaldson, et al. New primary neoplasms of the central nervous system in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst, November 1, 2006; 98(21): 1528 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Spiegler, K. Kennedy, R. Maze, M. L. Greenberg, S. Weitzman, J. K. Hitzler, and P. C. Nathan Comparison of Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcomes in Young Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Cranial Radiation or High-Dose or Very High-Dose Intravenous Methotrexate J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2006; 24(24): 3858 - 3864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bassal, A. C. Mertens, L. Taylor, J. P. Neglia, B. S. Greffe, S. Hammond, C. M. Ronckers, D. L. Friedman, M. Stovall, Y. Y. Yasui, et al. Risk of Selected Subsequent Carcinomas in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2006; 24(3): 476 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Rice, P. Vacek, A. H. Homans, T. Messier, J. Rivers, H. Kendall, and B. A. Finette Genotoxicity of Therapeutic Intervention in Children with Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 64(13): 4464 - 4471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay Fertility preservation in female patients Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 251 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Pui, C. Cheng, W. Leung, S. N. Rai, G. K. Rivera, J. T. Sandlund, R. C. Ribeiro, M. V. Relling, L. E. Kun, W. E. Evans, et al. Extended Follow-up of Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia N. Engl. J. Med., August 14, 2003; 349(7): 640 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hoelzer, N. Gokbuget, O. Ottmann, C.-H. Pui, M. V. Relling, F. R. Appelbaum, J. J.M. van Dongen, and T. Szczepanski Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Hematology, January 1, 2002; 2002(1): 162 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||