| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
BRIEF REPORT
From the Department of Hematology-Oncology, Istituto
Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy; the Department of Cellular
Biotechnologies and Hematology and the Department of Experimental
Medicine and Pathology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy; the
Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Kimmel Cancer Institute, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
The morphologic, immunophenotypic, genotypic, genomic, and
functional features of an undifferentiated acute leukemia with stem
cell features are reported. At light and electron microscopy, the
leukemic population was represented by primitive progenitor cells with
no evidence of differentiation. The blasts were CD34+,
AC133+, CD71 The use of monoclonal antibodies allows one
to identify the lineage affiliation and level of differentiation of
virtually all acute leukemias (ALs).1,2 The possibility
that AL may display multilineage differentiation potential has been
suggested for t(9;22) and t(4;11) acute lymphoblastic
leukemia.3-7 The high frequency of CD34
positivity8-10 points to the close relationship of AL with
early hemopoietic progenitor cells. Considerable interest has focused
on acute myeloid leukemia with minimal signs of
differentiation11-13; no study, however, has addressed the
multilineage potential of human AL or investigated the genomic
profiling and true "stem cell" capacity of such early leukemic
cells. Here, we report a very undifferentiated stem cell leukemia in
which the lineage affiliation could not be defined by conventional characterization.
Case report
Electron microscopy, immunophenotype, and hemopoietic growth
factor receptor characterization
Immunophenotypic characterization was conducted by means of
reagents against the following: CD34, surface (s)CD13,
cytoplasmic (cy)CD13, CD33, CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, CD14, CD15,
CD18, MPO, HLA-DR, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), CD10,
sCD22, cyCD22, CD19, CD23, CD10, CD20, CD79a, immunoglobulin- The expression of different hemopoietic growth factor (HGF) receptors was investigated by means of reagents and procedures previously reported.15 Genotypic characterization and genomic profiling The configuration of the IgH chain gene region was analyzed by single-step polymerase chain reaction,16 while the T-cell receptor- (TCR- ) gene was analyzed
through the amplification of the TCR- locus V-J junction region by
heteroduplex analysis.17
For genomic profiling, total RNA was extracted by means of TRizol reagent (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and further purified with the use of SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI). The protocol for sample preparation and microarray processing is available from Affymetrix (www.Affymetrix.com; Santa Clara, CA). Genomic profiling was carried out by means of the Affymetrix U95Av2 gene chip, which contains 12 600 gene sequences. To calculate gene expression levels and for normalization with other acute leukemia samples, the d-chip program was used.18 Genes whose expression levels were higher than 100 were considered expressed. Cell-growth, cell-cycle, apoptosis, and clonogenic activity Recombinant human interleukin-3 (rhIL-3) (2 × 106 U/mg), rh granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF), and rhIL-6 (2 × 108 U/mg) were supplied by Genetics Institute (Cambridge, MA); rh erythropoietin (rhEpo) (1.2 × 105 U/mg) and bovine basic fibroblast growth factor (rhbFGF; 2 × 107 U/mg) by Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA); rh flt-3 ligand (FL) (1.9 × 106 U/mg) and rh c-kit ligand (KL) (1 × 105 U/mg) by Immunex (Seattle, WA); rhG-CSF (1 × 108 U/mg) and rhM-CSF (6 × 107 U/mg) by R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN); rh thrombopoietin (rhTpo) was generously provided by Genentech (San Francisco, CA). Iscoves modified Dulbecco medium (IMDM) (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) was prepared weekly.Leukemic cells were grown in liquid suspension in IMDM containing 10% fetal calf serum (GIBCO) and various combinations of HGFs. The cell number was evaluated at each day of culture after trypan blue staining. Cell-cycle analysis was carried out on nuclei stained with propidium iodide, as described.19
Morphologic and immunophenotypic characterization The leukemic population was uniformly composed of highly undifferentiated small- to medium-sized blasts. All cytochemical reactions were negative. Ultrastructural examination showed a large, centrally placed nucleus with prominent nucleoli. The cytoplasm contained small amounts of free ribosomes, a small Golgi apparatus, and endoplasmic reticulum cisternae. No MPO activity was detected.The immunophenotype showed that (1) leukemic cells were
CD34+ and did not express MPO; (2) CD34+ cells
displayed a phenotype similar to that associated with most normal
immature hemopoietic progenitors, CD33
The immaturity of the blasts was further supported by the pattern
of transcription factor expression: GATA-2+,
Tal-1 Genotypic characterization and genomic profiling The IgH and TCR- gene regions were germline. To more precisely
elucidate the nature of the leukemia, a genomic profiling was carried
out. While the conventional lymphoid- and myeloid-related genes were
not expressed, a set of early stem cell and myeloid-associated genes,
particularly of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) family, was
found (Table 1). CD34 and flt3 were
expressed at high levels.
HGF receptor expression HGF receptor analysis showed that (1) untreated blasts exhibited a characteristic pattern of HGF receptor expression, in which receptors for early-acting and multilineage HGF were expressed, while receptors for late-acting HGF were virtually absent; (2) blasts grown for 5 days with FL exhibited the expected down-modulation of flt3; no modifications in c-kit, IL-6R, or IL-3R ; and a significant rise
in the expression of all 4 unilineage HGF receptors (Figure 1B); and
(3) incubation for 5 days with KL induced a similar phenomenon, with
some quantitative differences, consisting of the induction of higher
levels of EpoR and lower levels of G-CSFR and c-fms compared with those
elicited by FL (Figure 1B).
In vitro growth factor response Studies performed with the use of a single HGF showed that only FL, but not other HGFs, had the capacity to sustain the proliferation (Figure 2A) and cell cycling (Figure 2B) of leukemic cells and protect them from apoptosis (data not shown). The combination of different HGFs revealed several peculiar findings: (1) The combination of late-acting HGFs was insufficient to support the growth (Figure 2A-B) and to protect from apoptosis leukemic cells (data not shown). (2) Similarly, multilineage HGF added alone or in combination with late-acting HGF neither stimulated the proliferation of leukemic cells (Figure 2A-B) nor protected them from apoptosis (data not shown). (3) Different combinations of early-acting HGF stimulated the proliferation of leukemic cells only when FL was present in the HGF cocktail (Figure 2A-B). (4) The combination of all early, multilineage, and late-acting HGFs maximally stimulated leukemic blast growth (Figure 2A-B).
In parallel, we evaluated the capacity of HGFs to induce the differentiation of leukemic blasts. Single HGF did not allow blasts to differentiate: blasts grown for 1, 2, or 3 weeks in the presence of FL maintained a blast morphology (Figure 2C) and did not display lineage-specific membrane antigens. Interestingly, the addition of early-acting HGFs induced, after 3 weeks of culture, a predominant monocytic differentiation, as shown by morphologic (Figure 2C) and immunophenotypic criteria (the cells became CD14+). Addition of KL to multilineage plus unilineage HGFs elicited the differentiation of leukemic blasts into the monocytic and erythroid lineages (Figure 2C), while the addition of KL to unilineage HGFs elicited a selective erythroid differentiation (Figure 2C). The addition of FL to multilineage HGFs in combination with unilineage HGFs or to unilineage HGFs alone induced the differentiation of leukemic cells toward all 4 myeloid hemopoietic lineages (Figure 2C). Taken together, these findings confirm the close stem cell association of this case and further pointed to its likely early myeloid affiliation. It should also be noted that we observed the induction of endothelial cell markers (ie, CD105, CD106, CD62E, and CD62P) after in vitro culture of leukemic cells in the presence of FL and vascular endothelial growth factor. Further studies on other cases of undifferentiated AL are required to verify whether the atypical pattern of HGF receptor expression and response to HGF and multilineage differentiation potential here reported represents a peculiar property of this leukemia subtype.
Submitted August 9, 2001; accepted February 12, 2002.
Supported by Istituto Superiore di Sanità Italy-USA, project on "Therapy of Tumors" and 1% project; Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro; and Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Robin Foa, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Via Benevento 6, 00161 Rome, Italy; e-mail: rfoa{at}bce.med.uniroma1.it.
1. Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL). Leukemia. 1995;9:1783-1786[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Weir EG, Borowitz MJ. Flow cytometry in the diagnosis of acute leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2001;38:124-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Reardon DA, Hanson CA, Roth MS, Castle VP. Lineage switch in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 1994;73:1526-1532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Lo Coco F, Francia di Celle P, Alimena G, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the 4;11 translocation exhibiting early T cell features. Leukemia. 1989;3:79-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Stong RC, Korsmeyer SJ, Parkin JL, Arthur DC, Kersey JH.
Human acute leukemia cell line with the t(4;11) chromosomal rearrangement exhibits B lineage and monocytic characteristics.
Blood.
1985;65:21-31 6. Guglielmi C, Cordone I, Boecklin F, et al. Immunophenotype of adult and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: changes at first relapse and clinico-prognostic implications. Leukemia. 1997;11:1501-1507[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. van Wering ER, Beishuizen A, Roeffen ET, et al. Immunophenotypic changes between diagnosis and relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 1995;9:1523-1533[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Costello R, Mallet F, Chambost H, et al.
The immunophenotype of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0): reduced immunogenicity and high frequency of CD34+/CD38
9.
Pui CH, Hancock ML, Head DR, et al.
Clinical significance of CD34 expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
1993;82:889-894 10. Wells SJ, Bray RA, Stempora LL, Farhi DC. CD117/CD34 expression in leukemic blasts. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106:192-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Venditti A, Del Poeta G, Buccisano F, et al.
Minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0): comparison of 25 cases with other French-American-British subtypes.
Blood.
1997;89:621-629 12. Cohen PL, Hoyer JD, Kurtin PJ, Dewald GW, Hanson CA. Acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation: a multiple parameter study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109:32-38[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Béné M-C, Bernier M, Casasnovas RO, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia M0: haematological, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic characteristics and their prognostic significance: an analysis in 241 patients. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:737-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Lambertenghi-Deliliers G, Pozzolo E, Zanon P, Maiolo AT. Ultrastructural study of myeloperoxidase activity in acute leukemia cells [abstract]. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1978;10:239.
15.
Testa U, Fossati C, Samoggia P, et al.
Expression of growth factor receptors in unilineage differentiation culture of purified hematopoietic progenitors.
Blood.
1996;88:3391-3406 16. Nizet Y, Mariat P, Vaerman JL, et al. Follow-up of residual disease (MRD) in B lineage acute leukaemias using simplified PCR strategy: evolution of MRD rather than its detection is correlated with clinical outcome. Br J Haematol. 1991;79:205-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
17.
Bottaro M, Berti E, Biondi A, Migone N, Crosti L.
Heteroduplex analysis of T-cell receptor
18.
Li C, Hung Wong W.
Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2001;98:31-36 19. Nicoletti I, Migliorati G, Pagliacci MC, Grignani F, Riccardi C. A rapid and simple method for measuring thymocyte apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 1991;139:271-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Gallacher L, Murdoch B, Wu DM, Karanu FN, Keeney M, Bhatia M.
Isolation and characterization of human CD34(
21.
Bene MC, Bernier M, Casasnovas RO, et al.
The reliability and specificity of c-kit for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemias and undifferentiated leukemias. The European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukemias (EGIL).
Blood.
1998;92:596-599
22.
Carow CE, Levenstein M, Kaufmann SH, et al.
Expression of the hematopoietic growth factor receptor FLT3 (STK-1/Flk2) in human leukemias.
Blood.
1996;87:1089-1096 23. Labbaye C, Valtieri M, Barberi T, et al. Differential expression and functional role of GATA-2, NF-E2, and GATA-1 in normal adult hematopoiesis: differential expression and functional role of GATA-2, NF-E2, and GATA-1 in normal adult hematopoiesis. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2346-2358[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
M. Djokic, E. Bjorklund, E. Blennow, J. Mazur, S. Soderhall, and A. Porwit Overexpression of CD123 correlates with the hyperdiploid genotype in acute lymphoblastic leukemia Haematologica, July 1, 2009; 94(7): 1016 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Carter, T. Hamatani, A. A. Sharov, C. E. Carmack, Y. Qian, K. Aiba, N. T. Ko, D. B. Dudekula, P. M. Brzoska, S. S. Hwang, et al. In Situ-Synthesized Novel Microarray Optimized for Mouse Stem Cell and Early Developmental Expression Profiling Genome Res., May 1, 2003; 13(5): 1011 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||