| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
BRIEF REPORT
From the Genetic Epidemiology Branch and the Laboratory
of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; the Intramural
Research Support Program, SAIC Frederick, National Cancer
Institute-Frederick, MD; Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo
Alto, CA; and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Santa Clara Valley
Medical Center, San Jose, CA.
The HLA region has long been implicated in sporadic and familial
Hodgkin disease (HD), with recent case-control studies suggesting that
HLA class II loci predispose to sporadic nodular sclerosis HD (NSHD).
To determine whether this predisposition extends to familial HD, HLA
class II loci (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, DRB3, DRB4, and DRB5) and transporter
associated with antigen processing (TAP) loci (TAP1, TAP2) were
investigated in 100 members of 16 families with at least 2 confirmed
cases of HD. With the use of the transmission disequilibrium
test, evidence for linkage disequilibrium with familial HD and,
in particular, familial NSHD was obtained for the
DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype, the TAP1 allele encoding Ile
at residue 333, and the DRB5-0101 allele. These 3 markers were in
linkage disequilibrium and may not represent independent susceptibility
regions. Use of a family-based approach excludes population
stratification as an explanation for these findings.
(Blood. 2002;99:690-693) The etiology of Hodgkin disease (HD) is largely
unknown and probably involves both environmental and genetic factors.
Ferraris et al1 estimate that 4.5% of HD cases occur as
familial HD.2 Although considerable evidence exists
supporting a chronic infectious process due to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
in HD,3 EBV-encoded RNA has been detected in only
approximately 27% of tumors from familial HD cases,4,5
and the association is weakest with nodular sclerosis HD (NSHD), the HD
subtype overrepresented among young adults and familial
cases.6,7 More importantly, within families there is no
excess concordance of the EBV status of tumors.4,5 In
contrast, an elevated risk of HD among monozygotic twins compared with
dizygotic twins of HD patients8 suggests a role for shared genetic factors in familial HD.
The HLA class I region on chromosome 6 (particularly the B5, B8, B18,
and A1 alleles) has been weakly but consistently associated with both
sporadic and familial HD.9-11 In familial HD, 60% to 70%
of cases of which may be linked to this region,12 there is
significant HLA class I haplotype sharing among affected
individuals.11,13 More recent evidence suggests a role of
HLA class II antigens. The DPB1*0301 allele was implicated in
HD,14,15 but an analysis of multiple HLA class II loci
(eg, DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, and DPB1) discounted an independent role of
DPB1.16 Klitz et al16 conducted a
case-unrelated control study and reported that NSHD (but not other
histologic subtypes) is positively associated with the DRB1*1501, DQB1*0602, and DRB1*1104 alleles and negatively associated with the
DRB1*1601, DRB1*0404, and DQB1*0303 alleles. They concluded that
susceptibility to NSHD was probably due to several HLA class II loci,
including DRB1, DQB1, and perhaps other, yet-to-be-identified loci.
We investigated whether alleles at HLA class II loci (DQA1, DQB1, DRB1,
DRB3, DRB4, DRB5) and transporter associated with antigen processing
(TAP) loci (TAP1 and TAP2) play a role in familial HD. We tested for
linkage disequilibrium with familial HD and, in particular, with
familial NSHD.
Subjects
HLA class II and TAP genotyping
Statistical analysis Linkage disequilibrium between alleles or haplotypes and HD and, in particular, NSHD was assessed by means of the transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT).20,21 DRB3, DRB4, and DRB5 data were treated as a single variable, called DRB3-5. Candidate alleles (ie, those with statistically significant associations with HD in the only previous study of these factors16) at multiallelic loci were evaluated against all other alleles combined, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Certain noncandidate alleles (ie, those that either were not significantly associated with HD16 or were not investigated previously) were evaluated with the use of adjusted significance points21 if the number of informative transmissions was large enough to achieve a statistically significant result (P < .05). Meiotic segregation distortion was evaluated by examining transmission to the unaffected siblings and half-siblings of the affected members with known parental genotypes.It was necessary to exclude one family from analysis for one locus (TAP2 Ile379Val) because one parent was unavailable, the other parent and the offspring were heterozygous, and the transmitted allele could not be determined. Because such exclusion can produce bias,22 we determined the range of its potential effect by including this family in the analysis assuming that the heterozygous parent transmitted (1) the Ile allele to all offspring or (2) the Val allele to all offspring. The results were essentially unchanged and are not presented. For all other loci, the transmissions within this family were unambiguous. There were 5 other families in which one parent of affected member(s) was unavailable, and the transmitted alleles were unambiguous for all loci in these families. To control for potential confounding by other alleles at the locus under investigation, the TDT was also performed with the exclusion of candidate alleles at the locus from the analysis. The results were similar to those obtained without exclusions and are not presented.
This study provides evidence that the
DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype is related to the development
of familial HD (P = .03), particularly, familial NSHD
(P = .02) (Table 1). This haplotype was transmitted 72.7% of the time (16 of 22) to an affected offspring, while it was transmitted 44% of the time (12 of 27) to
unaffected siblings. At individual loci, evidence for linkage was
obtained for DRB1*1501, DQB1*0602, and, for familial NSHD only,
DQA1*0102 (Tables 1 and 2). The DRB1, DQB1, and DQA1 loci are in tight
linkage disequilibrium,23 and the observed effect could
not be localized to a single gene. All cases with the DRB1*1501 and
DQB1*0602 alleles had the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype; 3 cases (2 NSHD, 1 non-NSHD) had the DQA1*0102 allele in a different haplotype (DRB1*1600-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0502). Our findings are in agreement with those from a case-control study involving 196 nonfamilial HD patients, in which a significantly increased risk of
NSHD was associated with the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype
but could not be attributed to a single locus within the
haplotype.16 Unlike case-control analyses, the TDT is
insensitive to population stratification; thus, the significant
findings obtained in our study provide important new evidence of
linkage and association.
The DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype was observed in 16 of 28 HD cases (57.1%) (11 heterozygotes, 5 homozygotes) and in 14 of the 23 cases (60.9%) with NSHD (9 heterozygotes, 5 homozygotes). Nine of 16 families presented as sibling pairs with HD, which may indicate a recessive pattern of inheritance or a dominant gene with moderate to low penetrance. However, 6 families had HD cases in successive generations, suggesting a dominant gene with decreased penetrance in at least a subset of the families or a frequent recessive gene. The TDT provides valid results regardless of the mode of inheritance. There was no evidence that affected individuals within families were more likely to share the same HD subtype than unrelated affected individuals (P > .99). The affected individuals analyzed in this study were those living at the time the family was referred to the National Cancer Institute and therefore may represent a subset of patients with better survival. Approximately 80% of cases had NSHD, slightly higher than the rate seen (70%) among whites overall.6 We observed nonsignificant excesses of the DRB1*1104 allele and the DRB1*1104-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0301 haplotype and nonsignificant deficits of the DRB1*0701 and DQA1*0201 alleles among all familial HD cases and among the subset of familial NSHD cases (Table 1). Although the number of informative transmissions was limited for these comparisons, our results are consistent with the statistically significant associations found for these genetic markers by Klitz et al.16 Among noncandidate alleles, the DQB1*0201 allele was underrepresented among familial HD cases (P = .13); the TAP1 allele encoding Ile at residue 333 predisposed to familial HD, particularly familial NSHD (P = .02); and the DRB5*0101 allele was transmitted more often than expected, particularly in familial NSHD (P = .08) (Table 2). However, the DRB5*0101 allele always cosegregated with the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype. Also, evidence for linkage disequilibrium between familial NSHD and TAP1 Ile333Val was limited to the subset of transmissions in which the TAP1 Ile allele cosegregated with the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype and the DRB5*0101 allele. Thus, we cannot resolve whether the 3 markers that demonstrated linkage disequilibrium with familial NSHD (ie, the DRB1*1501-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotype, the TAP1 Ile allele, and the DRB5*0101 allele) represent more than one independent susceptibility locus. There was no evidence for preferential transmission of particular alleles or haplotypes to the unaffected siblings and half siblings of HD patients (Tables 1, 2). Taken together, the results of this study and those of Klitz et al16 provide evidence that the DRB1*1501 and DQB1*0602 alleles, or loci in linkage disequilibrium with them, confer risk for the development or, perhaps, survival of both sporadic and familial HD.
The authors would like to thank the participating families for their generosity and cooperation; Drs Richard Spielman and Warren Ewens for helpful comments regarding implementation of the TDT; and Jean Whitehouse, RN, Jennifer Hipkins, RN, and Mary K. Buranosky, RN, for clinical assistance.
Submitted December 6, 2000; accepted August 2, 2001.
Supported by in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. N01-CO-56000.
L.H. and A.L. contributed equally to this work.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Alisa M. Goldstein, Genetic Epidemiology Branch, DCEG/NCI/NIH, EPS MSC 7236, Bethesda, MD 20892-7236.
1. Ferraris AM, Racchi O, Rapezzi D, Gaetani GF, Boffetta P. Familial Hodgkin's disease: a disease of young adulthood? Ann Hematol. 1997;74:131-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. McKusick VA. Mendelian Inheritance in Man: Catalogs of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. 11th Ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994:1891-1892. 3. Mueller NE. Hodgkin's disease. In: Schottenfeld D,Fraumeni JF Jr, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996:893-919. 4. Schlaifer D, Rigal-Huguet F, Robert A, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in familial Hodgkin's disease. Br J Haematol. 1994;88:636-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Lin AY, Kingma DW, Lennette ET, et al.
Epstein-Barr virus and familial Hodgkin's disease.
Blood.
1996;88:3160-3165 6. Glaser SL, Jarrett RF. The epidemiology of Hodgkin's disease. Baillière's Clin Haematol. 1996;9:401-416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. Lin AY, Tucker MA. Current status of epidemiologic studies pertaining to Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. In: Canellos G,Lister T,Sklar J, eds. The Lymphomas. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997:43-61.
8.
Mack TM, Cozen W, Shibata DK, et al.
Concordance for Hodgkin's disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the young-adult form of the disease.
N Engl J Med.
1995;332:413-418 9. Amiel J. Study of the leukocyte phenotypes in Hodgkin's disease. In: Terasaki PI, ed. Histocompatibility Testing. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1967:79-81. 10. Greene MH, McKeen EZ, Li FP, Blattner WA, Fraumeni JF Jr. HLA antigens in familial Hodgkin's disease. Int J Cancer. 1979;23:777-780[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Hors J, Dausset J. HLA and susceptibility to Hodgkin's disease. Immunol Rev. 1983;70:167-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Chakravarti A, Halloran SL, Bale SJ, Tucker MA. Etiological heterogeneity in Hodgkin's disease: HLA linked and unlinked determinants of susceptibility independent of histological concordance. Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3:407-415[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Berberich FR, Berberich MS, King MC, Engleman EG, Grumet FC. Hodgkin's disease susceptibility: linkage to the HLA locus demonstrated by a new concordance method. Hum Immunol. 1983;6:207-217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Oza AM, Tonks S, Lim J, Fleetwood MA, Lister TA, Bodmer JG.
A clinical and epidemiological study of human leukocyte antigen-DPB alleles in Hodgkin's disease.
Cancer Res.
1994;54:5101-5105 15. Taylor GM, Gokhale DA, Crowther D, et al. Increased frequency of HLA-DPB1*0301 in Hodgkin's disease suggests that susceptibility is HVR-sequence and subtype-associated. Leukemia. 1996;10:854-859[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Klitz W, Aldrich CL, Fildes N, Horning SJ, Begovich AB. Localization of predisposition to Hodgkin's disease in the HLA class II region. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;4:497-505. 17. Hildesheim A, Schiffman M, Scott DR, et al. Human leukocyte antigen class I/II alleles and development of human papillomavirus-related cervical neoplasia: results from a case-control study conducted in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:1035-1041[Abstract]. 18. Bunce M, O'Neill CM, Barnado MC, et al. Phototyping: comprehensive DNA typing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5, and DQB1 by PCR with 144 primer mixes utilizing sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Tissue Antigens. 1995;46:355-367[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Carrington M, Colonna M, Spies T, Stephens JC, Mann DL. Haplotypic variation of the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) genes and their extension of HLA class II region haplotypes. Immunogenetics. 1993;37:266-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet. 1993;52:506-516[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association [invited editorial]. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;59:983-989[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Sham PC, Curtis D. An extended transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for multi-allele marker loci. Ann Hum Genet. 1995;9:323-336. 23. Begovich AB, McClure GR, Suraj VC, et al. Polymorphism, recombination, and linkage disequilibrium within the HLA class II region. J Immunol. 1992;148:249-258[Abstract].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
C. F. Skibola, J. D. Curry, and A. Nieters Genetic susceptibility to lymphoma Haematologica, July 1, 2007; 92(7): 960 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Friedman, N. S. Kadan-Lottick, J. Whitton, A. C. Mertens, Y. Yasui, Y. Liu, A. T. Meadows, L. L. Robison, and L. C. Strong Increased Risk of Cancer among Siblings of Long-term Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1922 - 1927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L R Goldin, M L McMaster, M Ter-Minassian, S Saddlemire, B Harmsen, G Lalonde, and M A Tucker A genome screen of families at high risk for Hodgkin lymphoma: evidence for a susceptibility gene on chromosome 4 J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2005; 42(7): 595 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hjalgrim, S. Rasmussen, K. Rostgaard, N. M. Nielsen, N. Koch-Henriksen, L. Munksgaard, H. H. Storm, and M. Melbye Familial Clustering of Hodgkin Lymphoma and Multiple Sclerosis J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 2004; 96(10): 780 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cozen, P. S. Gill, S. A. Ingles, R. Masood, O. Martinez-Maza, M. G. Cockburn, W. J. Gauderman, M. C. Pike, L. Bernstein, B. N. Nathwani, et al. IL-6 levels and genotype are associated with risk of young adult Hodgkin lymphoma Blood, April 15, 2004; 103(8): 3216 - 3221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||