| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Oncology, and
Pathology Sections, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center, and the University of Washington School of Medicine,
Seattle, WA.
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) targets leukemia cells expressing
the CD33 receptor by means of a monoclonal antibody conjugated to a
cytotoxic agent, calicheamicin. Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia
(AML) with gemtuzumab ozogamicin may result in liver injury. We
reviewed the course of 23 patients who were given gemtuzumab ozogamicin
for AML that had relapsed after hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Liver toxicity was assessed through physical examination, serum tests,
histologic examination, and hepatic venous pressure measurements. Liver
injury developed in 11 patients after gemtuzumab ozogamicin
administration; it was manifested as weight gain, ascites, and jaundice
in 7 patients. Seven patients died with persistent liver dysfunction
and either multiorgan failure or sepsis at a median of 40 days after
gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion. Portal pressure measurements were
elevated in 2 patients. Results of liver histologic examination in 5 patients showed sinusoidal injury with extensive sinusoidal fibrosis,
centrilobular congestion, and hepatocyte necrosis. Six patients
experienced AML remission that was sustained for at least 60 days after
gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion. In summary, hepatic sinusoidal liver
injury developed after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion.
Histology showed striking deposition of sinusoidal collagen, suggesting
that gemtuzumab ozogamicin targets CD33+ cells residing in
hepatic sinusoids as the mechanism for its hepatic toxicity.
(Blood. 2002;99:2310-2314) In May 2000, the United States Food and Drug
Administration approved gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg; Wyeth-Ayerst
Pharmaceuticals, Radnor, PA) for the treatment of relapsed
CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia in patients older than 60. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin uses monoclonal antibody technology to target
leukemia cells expressing the CD33 receptor by means of a humanized
antibody conjugated to a modified cytotoxic agent,
calicheamicin.1,2 On binding to the CD33 antigen, the
calicheamicin-antibody complex is internalized into target cells, and
calicheamicin is released intracellularly.3 In phase 2 clinical trials involving 188 patients, the frequencies of gemtuzumab
ozogamicin-related elevated bilirubin levels greater than 3 mg/dL and
of serum aminotransferase enzyme levels greater than 5 times normal
were 8% and 16%, respectively (Sievers et al,2 Sievers
et al,4 and unpublished observations (March 2001),
Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals). One patient died with
persistent ascites and hepatosplenomegaly.4 Several
additional case reports of gemtuzumab ozogamicin-related liver toxicity
have been reported, some in association with other chemotherapy
agents.5,6 In patients administered gemtuzumab ozogamicin
after myeloablative therapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation, the
reported frequency of posttransplantation clinical illness resembling
veno-occlusive disease of the liver was 6 of 38 (16%) and included 3 fatalities (Sievers et al7 and unpublished observations
(March 2001), Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals).
This report describes the frequency and course of liver injury in 23 consecutive patients given gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of
relapsed leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Liver
injury in these patients affected hepatic sinusoids and was accompanied
by signs of portal hypertension as the dominant clinical feature. We
suggest that this form of liver toxicity results from the delivery of
calicheamicin to CD33+ cells that reside in the sinusoids
of the liver (ie, Kupffer cells8,9 and leukemia
cells10 and possibly sinusoidal endothelial cells11 and stellate cells).
Patient selection
Assessment of liver injury
Evaluation of risk factors for liver injury Details of hematopoietic cell transplantation preceding gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy were recorded, specifically the conditioning regimen, donor type, drugs used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and development of any hepatobiliary problem after transplantation.16 Before the first dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, liver-related laboratory test results, concurrent medications, and comorbid medical problems were noted.Assessment of acute myeloid leukemia response Bone marrow aspirates were performed, when possible, 7 days after the administration of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Clearance of blasts was defined as less than 5% blasts identified by morphologic evaluation.Statistical considerations In analyzing possible risk factors for the development of gemtuzumab ozogamicin liver toxicity, the Fisher exact test was used to compare categoric variables and the Wilcoxon 2-sample test was used to compare continuous variables, recognizing that the small sample sizes would preclude definitive analysis.
Patient characteristics Between April 1995 and June 2000, 23 patients were given gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of recurrent AML after transplantation. The median age was 43 years (range, 26-60 years). There were 9 men and 14 women. Thirteen patients received grafts from a matched sibling, 8 received them from other allogeneic donors, and 2 received autologous grafts. Pretransplantation myeloablative conditioning therapy consisted of busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (10 patients), cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation (10 patients), busulfan plus total body irradiation (2 patients), and busulfan plus etoposide (1 patient). Eight (35%) patients had evidence of veno-occlusive disease of the liver after transplantation; jaundice and weight gain caused by veno-occlusive disease resolved in all patients before they were administered gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Nineteen patients had evidence of acute GVHD at some time point after transplantation; 9 of them had GVHD at the time of gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion. The median interval between transplantation and infusion of gemtuzumab ozogamicin was 131 days (range, 17-967 days). The median dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin given to these patients was 4 mg/m2 (range, 0.25-9 mg/m2); 14, 7, and 2 patients received 1, 2, and 3 doses, respectively.Incidence and clinical presentation of liver injury after Mylotarg therapy After Mylotarg infusion, 11 patients had no overt liver abnormalities, but one patient had clinical and histologic evidence of GVHD involving the liver. Eleven (48%) patients had evidence of liver toxicity after gemtuzumab ozogamicin administration. The frequency of liver abnormalities, the peak values, and the timing of these abnormalities in these patients are given in Table 1. Hepatomegaly and either weight gain greater than 5% or ascites developed in 8 patients within 7 to 10 days of gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion, followed by elevation of AST, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase levels. Peak values for these tests occurred at medians of 8 to 22 days after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion. Ascites was clinically obvious in 5 of 7 patients. Wedged hepatic venous pressure gradients were measured at the time of transvenous liver biopsy in 2 patients, and both measurements were elevated (18 and 29 mm Hg, respectively; normal level, 6 mm Hg or less15). Encephalopathy developed in one patient 13 days after gemtuzumab ozogamicin, but it responded to oral lactulose therapy. Liver tissue was available from 3 of these 8 patients, each showing evidence of sinusoidal injury (see below). Three patients had abnormal liver test results after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion, but they had no evidence of weight gain, ascites, or hepatomegaly. Liver histologic examination in 2 of these patients showed sinusoidal injury (see below).
Course of putative Mylotarg-related liver injury Of 11 patients in whom liver injury temporarily followed gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion, 9 have died and 2 are alive. Two patients recovered from liver dysfunction and their ascites resolved, but they died of leukemic relapse 55 and 167 days, respectively, after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion. Seven patients died with persistent liver dysfunction and either multiorgan failure or sepsis at a median of 40 days after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion (range, 8-47 days).Liver histology Liver tissue was available from 6 of 23 patients, one showing only bile duct abnormalities typical of GVHD. Five patients had evidence of injury to zone 3 of the liver acinus, with varying degrees of congestion and hepatocyte necrosis, sinusoidal fibrosis, and venular abnormalities (subendothelial edema, phlebosclerosis, fibrotic venular occlusion). There appeared to be a relation between certain histologic findings and the time between gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure and tissue sampling. Zone 3 sinusoidal fibrosis was extensive in 3 patients whose time intervals from gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure to tissue sampling were 37, 28, and 24 days, respectively, but it was absent in 2 patients whose time intervals were 6 and 12 days, respectively. The sinusoidal fibrosis illustrated in Figure 1 was that of a patient with a 37-day interval from first gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure. Subendothelial edema in venules and zone 3 congestion, hemorrhage, and hepatocyte necrosis were more prominent when the time interval was shorter. Only the patient with the 37-day interval had phlebosclerosis or venular fibrotic occlusion; by quantitative count, fibrotic occlusion affected only 29% of her venules at autopsy, whereas most lobules had evidence of sinusoidal fibrosis (Figure 1). One patient had evidence of sinusoidal injury and bile duct damage consistent with GVHD.
Risk factors for putative Mylotarg-related liver injury We compared patients who had liver injury after gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n = 11) with those who did not (n = 12) according to the variables listed in Table 2. The only factor possibly related to development of liver injury was the total dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which was marginally higher among patients with liver injury (median, 9 mg/m2; range, 5-18 mg/m2) than among those without it (median, 6 mg/m2; range, 0.25-18 mg/m2).
Response rate of acute myeloid leukemia after Mylotarg Twenty-two patients were evaluable for antileukemic response to gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy (one patient underwent conventional chemotherapy 3 days after receiving 0.25 mg/m2 gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Ten patients had no more than 5% blasts in the bone marrow after at least one dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Sustained remissions of at least 60 days were observed in 6 of these 10 patients, 2 of whom then received donor lymphocyte infusions and remained disease free for 8 and 48 months, respectively, before experiencing extramedullary relapses of AML. The actuarial survival of patients in this series was 23% at 1 year. Product limit estimates show that survival of these 23 patients who had AML relapses after hematopoietic cell transplantation and who were treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin did not differ significantly from our historical experience of 333 similar patients who were not treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (data not shown).
Liver injury after gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion in our patients
was usually manifested by signs of portal hypertension There are 3 potential mechanisms by which gemtuzumab ozogamicin might
cause injury to cells in hepatic sinusoids: (1) exposure to
unconjugated calicheamicin in the circulation; (2) nonspecific uptake
of the antibody-calicheamicin complex by Kupffer cells, similar to the
mechanism of liver injury from another antibody-toxin conjugate,
LMB-224,25; and (3) receptor-mediated uptake of the
antibody-calicheamicin complex through CD33 expression on one or more
of the cell populations of the liver. These are not mutually exclusive
hypotheses. We speculate that the most likely explanation is
receptor-mediated uptake of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, for the following
reasons. The calicheamicin in gemtuzumab ozogamicin is not the natural,
highly toxic product but is an acetylated derivative that is less
toxic. Although there is a free N-acetyl- Although there have been reports of liver injury resembling veno-occlusive disease of the liver after monotherapy with gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion,5,6 the prevalence of this sort of injury is less than 5% in patients with AML who have not undergone transplantation.2,4 After multidrug chemotherapy that includes gemtuzumab ozogamicin or treatment schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy with more time-intensive dosing intervals, the frequency of liver injury may be higher.5 In the patients reported here with available liver histology findings, sinusoidal fibrosis was the most common lesion. Fibrous venular occlusion was seen in only 1 of 5 patients with clinical evidence of portal hypertension, and in that patient most of the venules were patent. No matter what the name, drug toxicity to cells in hepatic sinusoids and the resultant sinusoidal obstruction syndrome may not be readily identified by screening tools used in phase 1 and 2 drug studies because signs of portal hypertension (hepatomegaly, renal sodium retention, rapid weight gain, ascites) may develop in the absence of jaundice and the elevation of serum aminotransferase enzyme levels.31 The high prevalence of liver injury after gemtuzumab ozogamicin in our series suggests that there is something about the hepatic milieu in patients who have survived hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that makes the liver more susceptible to gemtuzumab ozogamicin-related sinusoidal injury. There are 4 potential explanations: (1) high-dose myeloablative conditioning therapy damages sinusoidal endothelial cells and activates stellate cells, making both these nonhepatocyte cell types more susceptible to subsequent injury21,32; (2) after allografting, Kupffer cells (derived from donor hematopoietic cells33) may be more susceptible to injury and more prone to occlude sinusoidal blood flow34; (3) sinusoidal endothelial cells might express CD33 (an untested hypothesis) because of their derivation from donor hematopoietic stem cells11; and (4) inflammatory cells related to acute GVHD, retained in the liver, may have activated Kupffer cells and stellate cells before gemtuzumab ozogamicin infusion.35,36 In summary, some patients given gemtuzumab ozogamicin for AML
relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation developed a
sinusoidal obstruction syndrome characterized by portal hypertension, jaundice, and elevated serum AST level. This form of liver toxicity may
be caused by targeted delivery of calicheamicin to CD33+
cells in the hepatic sinusoids
Submitted August 21, 2001; accepted November 15, 2001.
Supported by grants CA15704 and CA18029 from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
Correspondence: George B. McDonald, Gastroenterology/Hepatology Section (D2-190), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
1. Bernstein ID. Monoclonal antibodies to the myeloid stem cells: therapeutic implications of CMA-676, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody calicheamicin conjugate. Leukemia. 2000;14:474-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Sievers EL, Appelbaum FR, Spielberger RT, et al.
Selective ablation of acute myeloid leukemia using antibody-targeted chemotherapy: a phase I study of an anti-CD33 calicheamicin immunoconjugate.
Blood.
1999;93:3678-3684
3.
Zein N, Sinha AM, McGahren WJ, Ellestad GA.
Calicheamicin gamma II: an antitumor antibiotic that cleaves double-stranded DNA site specifically [abstract].
Science.
1988;240:1198
4.
Sievers EL, Larson RA, Stadtmauer EA, et al.
Efficacy and safety of Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;19:3244-3254 5. Giles FJ, Kantarjian HM, Kornblau SM, et al. Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) therapy is associated with hepatic venoocclusive disease in patients who have not received stem cell transplantation. Cancer. 2001;92:406-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 6. Neumeister P, Elbl M, Zinke-Cerwenka W, Scarpatetti M, Sill H, Linkesch W. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease in two patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia treated with anti-CD33 calicheamicin (CMA-676) immunoconjugate. Ann Hematol. 2001;80:119-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. Sievers EL, Larson RA, Estey E, et al. Low incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease after treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg, CMA-676): relationship to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [abstract]. Blood. 2000;96:206b. 8. Peiper SC, Leboeuf RD, Hughes CB, et al. Report on the CD33 cluster workshop: biochemical and genetic characterization of gp67. In: Knapp W,Dorken B,Gilks WR, et al., eds. Leucocyte typing IV: White Cell Differentiation Antigens. 1st ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1989:814-816.
9.
Tchilian EZ, Beverley PCL, Young BD, Watt SM.
Molecular cloning of two isoforms of the murine homolog of the myeloid CD33 antigen.
Blood.
1994;83:3188-3198 10. Scheimberg IB, Pollock DJ, Collins PW, Doran HM, Newland AC, van der Walt JD. Pathology of the liver in leukaemia and lymphoma: a study of 110 autopsies. Histopathology. 1995;26:311-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Gao Z, McAlister VC, Williams GM. Repopulation of liver endothelium by bone marrow-derived cells. Lancet. 2001;357:932-933[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Gleaves CA, Reed EC, Hackman RC, Meyers JC. Rapid diagnosis of invasive cytomegalovirus infection by examination of tissue specimens in centrifugation culture [abstract]. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;88:354[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Johnson JR, Egaas S, Gleaves CA, Hackman R, Bowden RA. Hepatitis due to herpes simplex virus in marrow-transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:38-45[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Shulman HM, Gooley T, Dudley MD, et al. Utility of transvenous liver biopsies and wedged hepatic venous pressure measurements in sixty marrow transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1995;59:1015-1022[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 15. Groszmann RJ, Glickman M, Blei AT, Storer E, Conn HO. Wedged and free hepatic venous pressure measured with a balloon catheter. Gastroenterology. 1979;76:253-258[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Strasser SI, McDonald GB. Hepatobiliary complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In: Schiff ER,Sorrell MF,Maddrey WC, eds. Schiff's Diseases of the Liver. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1999:1617-1641. 17. Carreras E, Granena A, Navasa M, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy in bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993;11:21-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Wang X, Kanel GC, DeLeve LD. Support of sinusoidal endothelial cell glutathione prevents hepatic veno-occlusive disease in the rat. Hepatology. 2000;31:428-434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Shepherd P, Harrison DJ. Idiopathic portal hypertension associated with cytotoxic drugs. J Clin Oncol. 1990;43:206-210. 20. Rollins BJ. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Am J Med. 1986;81:297-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. DeLeve LD, Wang XD, Huybrechts MM. Cellular target of cyclophosphamide toxicity in the murine liver-role of glutathione and site of metabolic activation. Hepatology. 1996;24:830-837[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Shulman HM, Fisher LB, Schoch HG, Henne KW, McDonald GB. Venocclusive disease of the liver after marrow transplantation: histologic correlates of clinical signs and symptoms. Hepatology. 1994;19:1171-1180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 23. Deleve LD, Shulman HM, McDonald GB. Toxic injury to hepatic sinusoids: sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (venocclusive disease). Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:623-637.
24.
Onda M, Willingham M, Wang QC, et al.
Inhibition of TNF-
25.
Kreitman RJ, Wilson WH, White JD, et al.
Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) in patients with hematologic malignancies.
J Clin Oncol.
2000;18:1622-1636 26. Peiper SC, Andrews RG. CD33 cluster workshop report. In: Schlossman SF,Boumsell L,Gilks W, et al., eds. Leucocyte Typing V: White Cell Differentiation Antigens. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1995:837-840. 27. Blakolmer K, Jaskiewicz K, Dunsford HA, Robson SC. Hematopoietic stem cell markers are expressed by ductal plate and bile duct cells in developing human liver. Hepatology. 1995;21:1510-1516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 28. Sell S. Heterogeneity and plasticity of hepatocyte lineage cells. Hepatology. 2001;33:738-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 29. Golden-Mason L, Curry MP, Nolan N, et al. Differential expression of lymphoid and myeloid markers on differentiating hematopoietic stem cells in normal and tumor-bearing adult human liver. Hepatology. 2000;31:1251-1256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Friedman SL.
Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis, an integrated cellular resonse to tissue injury.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:2247-2250 31. Bissell DM, Gores GJ, Laskin DL, Hoofnagle JH. Drug-induced liver injury: mechanisms and test systems. Hepatology. 2001;33:1009-1013[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 32. Shulman HM, McDonald GB, Matthews D, et al. An analysis of hepatic venocclusive disease and centrilobular hepatic degeneration following bone marrow transplantation. Gastroenterology. 1980;79:1178-1191[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
33.
Gale RP, Sparkes RS, Golde DW.
Bone marrow origin of hepatic macrophages (Kupffer cells) in humans.
Science.
1978;201:937-938
34.
MacPhee PJ, Schmidt EE, Groom AC.
Intermittence of blood flow in liver sinusoids, studied by high-resolution in vivo microscopy.
Am J Physiol.
1995;269:G692-G698 35. Shulman HM, Sharma P, Amos D, Fenster LF, McDonald GB. A coded histologic study of hepatic graft-versus-host disease after human marrow transplantation. Hepatology. 1988;8:463-470[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 36. Mehal WZ, Azzaroli F, Crispe IN. Immunology of the healthy liver: old questions and new insights. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:250-260[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
P. Kletting, D. Bunjes, S. N. Reske, and G. Glatting Improving Anti-CD45 Antibody Radioimmunotherapy Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 296 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Stahnke, T. Thepen, M. Stocker, R. Rosinke, E. Jost, R. Fischer, M. K. Tur, and S. Barth Granzyme B-H22(scFv), a human immunotoxin targeting CD64 in acute myeloid leukemia of monocytic subtypes Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 2924 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Maniecki, H. Hasle, L. Friis-Hansen, B. Lausen, O. J. Nielsen, K. Bendix, S. K. Moestrup, and H. J. Moller Impaired CD163-mediated hemoglobin-scavenging and severe toxic symptoms in patients treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 1510 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J.L. Kaspers and C. M. Zwaan Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: towards high-quality cure of all patients Haematologica, November 1, 2007; 92(11): 1519 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Beum, A. D. Kennedy, M. E. Williams, M. A. Lindorfer, and R. P. Taylor The Shaving Reaction: Rituximab/CD20 Complexes Are Removed from Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells by THP-1 Monocytes J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2600 - 2609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Bennett, J. R. Nebeker, E. A. Lyons, M. H. Samore, M. D. Feldman, J. M. McKoy, K. R. Carson, S. M. Belknap, S. M. Trifilio, G. T. Schumock, et al. The Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project JAMA, May 4, 2005; 293(17): 2131 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Westcott, R. J. Abi-Habib, K. A. Cohen, M. C. Willingham, S. Liu, T. H. Bugge, S. H. Leppla, and A. E. Frankel Diphtheria toxin-murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced hepatotoxicity is mediated by Kupffer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2004; 3(12): 1681 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nabhan, L. Rundhaugen, M. Jatoi, M. B. Riley, L. Boehlke, L. C. Peterson, and M. S. Tallman Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (MylotargTM) is infrequently associated with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome/veno-occlusive disease Ann. Onc., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1231 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Tur, M. Huhn, T. Thepen, M. Stocker, R. Krohn, S. Vogel, E. Jost, R. Osieka, J. G. van de Winkel, R. Fischer, et al. Recombinant CD64-Specific Single Chain Immunotoxin Exhibits Specific Cytotoxicity against Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8414 - 8419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J Giles, J. E Cortes, T. A Halliburton, S. J Mallard, E. H Estey, T. A Waddelow, and J. T Lim Intravenous Corticosteroids to Reduce Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Infusion Reactions Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2003; 37(9): 1182 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Zwaan, D. Reinhardt, S. Corbacioglu, E. R. van Wering, J. P. M. Bokkerink, W. J. E. Tissing, U. Samuelsson, J. Feingold, U. Creutzig, and G. J. L. Kaspers Gemtuzumab ozogamicin: first clinical experiences in children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated on compassionate-use basis Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 3868 - 3871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Sandmaier, W. A. Bethge, D. S. Wilbur, D. K. Hamlin, E. B. Santos, M. W. Brechbiel, D. R. Fisher, and R. Storb Bismuth 213-labeled anti-CD45 radioimmunoconjugate to condition dogs for nonmyeloablative allogeneic marrow grafts Blood, June 17, 2002; 100(1): 318 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Giles, A. Keating, A. H. Goldstone, I. Avivi, C. L. Willman, and H. M. Kantarjian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Hematology, January 1, 2002; 2002(1): 73 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||