| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
IMMUNOBIOLOGY
From Yale University, School of Medicine, Department of
Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine, New Haven, CT; Rockefeller
University, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, and the
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
In the initial stage of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL),
proliferating CTCL cells are concentrated in the epidermis in close association with an immature dendritic cell (DC), the Langerhans cell.
Because long-term in vitro culture of CTCL cells has proven difficult,
the in vivo association with the major antigen-presenting cell (APC) of
the epidermis has been postulated to play a role in directly
stimulating the clonal T-cell proliferation. We report that CTCL cells
can be reproducibly grown in culture for 3 months when cocultured with
immature DCs. CTCL cells retain the phenotype and genotype of the
initial malignant clone, whereas the APCs are a mixture of immature and
mature DCs. CTCL cell and DC survival was dependent on direct membrane
contact. Growth was inhibited by antibodies that bound to the T-cell
receptor (TCR) or interfered with the interaction of CD40 with its
ligand on the CTCL cell. Addition of antibody to CD3 or the clonotypic
TCR caused rapid CTCL cell apoptosis followed by engulfment by avidly
phagocytic immature DCs and subsequent DC maturation. The opportunity
to study CTCL cells and immature DCs for prolonged periods will
facilitate studies of tumor cell biology and will allow investigation
of the intriguing hypothesis that CTCL cell growth is driven through TCR recognition of class II-presented self-peptides. In addition, the
culture of CTCL cells will permit evaluation of therapies in vitro
before clinical intervention, thereby improving safety and efficacy.
(Blood. 2002;99:2929-2939) Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a
clonal,1 epidermotropic malignancy of
memory2,3 inducer T cells,4,5 which has been
difficult to study because of the inability to propagate the neoplastic
cells in vitro and the absence of suitable animal models. The malignant
cells initially proliferate in the epidermis and evolve more poorly
differentiated subclones that later escape the confines of the skin and
disseminate into the peripheral blood and internal
organs.6 The close apposition of the CTCL cells and the
Langerhans cell, an immature member of the dendritic cell (DC)
series,7 has suggested that the malignancy may be driven by Langerhans cell triggering of CTCL cell growth through engagement of
the CTCL cell T-cell receptor (TCR).8
Previous studies have shown that mitogen, antigen, and mixed
leukocyte cultures (MLCs) with or without cytokines only minimally stimulate proliferation of isolated CTCL cells.9-11 CTCL
cells cultured with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-7 and DCs cultured with granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and
IL-412 do not survive and proliferate beyond a few weeks
of culture. We have recently demonstrated that monocytes activated by
passage through leukapheresis centrifugation and subsequent
extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) treatment develop the phenotypic
and functional characteristics of immature DCs, which can engulf
apoptotic CTCL cells.13 When cells from the leukapheresis
harvest were cultured in the presence of supportive cytokines, both
CTCL cells and DCs continued to proliferate in vitro for 3 months.
We report that CTCL cells appear to retard DC maturation and this
immaturity enables avid phagocytosis of apoptotic tumor cells. Uptake
of apoptotic CTCL cells leads to the up-regulation of some DC
maturation markers and the potential for continued CTCL cell
stimulation through presentation of peptide derived from the CTCL cells
themselves in the DC class II molecules to the TCR of the
CD4+ T cells or release of DC-derived growth factors. This
codependency may explain the factors that influence the growth of CTCL
cells and elucidate the role of immature DCs in the disease process.
Cell cultures
Outgrowth of normal CD4 and CD8 T cells or Epstein-Barr
virus-transformed B cells may occur if normal cells predominate in the
peripheral blood of the patient. In our studies, the phenotype and
genotype of the cultured CTCL cells and DCs were evaluated to confirm
their purity. The majority of cultures established for study were
derived from the peripheral blood of patients with CTCL that contained
less than 10% contaminating normal cells and only the initial CTCL
cell malignant clone was propagated under those circumstances. The
cultures were negative for Mycoplasma contamination as
determined by a Mycotek Kit (Gibco Invitrogen, Grand Island,
NY), performed according to the manufacturer's directions.
Immunophenotyping
Two-color detection of membrane and cytoplasmic antigens Two-color membrane staining was performed (representative results from 1 of 6 cultures) by adding the predetermined optimum concentrations of both monoclonals directly conjugated to FITC or PE (30 minutes at 4°C) followed by washing. Two-color isotype-matched controls were used to detect background staining. To examine membrane and cytoplasmic antigen expression, a fixation and permeabilization kit was used essentially as described in the manufacturer's directions (Coulter-Immunotech). Membrane staining was assessed with monoclonal antibodies reactive with either CD83 or class II directly conjugated to FITC. Cytoplasmic staining was determined with CD3-PE. DC-LAMP cytoplasmic staining was assessed after permeabilization with a secondary antimouse reagent conjugated to FITC. As a control for DC-LAMP, an isotype control and the secondary antibody were added after permeabilization.Confocal microscopy The DCs were freed of CTCL cells by CD2-bead depletion and adhered to Alcian blue-coated coverslips. DCs were stained with rabbit anti-human class II and mouse anti-human LAMP (gift from Ira Mellman, Yale University). Alexa-Fluor antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were used to detect binding of the primary antibodies and FITC-conjugated goat antirabbit and Texas red-conjugated goat antimouse were used to detect irrelevant isotype control antibodies. Fluorescent staining was detected with a Zeiss confocal microscope.Polymerase chain reaction assay Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed at the Yale University, Department of Laboratory Medicine. A probe to detect rearrangement of consensus sequences of the chain (D2-J2) and chain of the TCR were used.
Proliferation assays Cell proliferation (representative results from 2 of 6 cultures) was evaluated by cultivation of magnetic bead-purified (as previously described,14 Dynal, Lake Success, NY) CD2+ CTCL cells (2 × 105 tumor cells/well) and tumor cell-depleted DCs (1 × 105 DCs/well) for 3 days. The wells were pulsed during the final 16 hours with [3H]-thymidine, harvested, and counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Results are the mean of 5 replicates ± SD.Because purified CTCL cells or DCs did not survive without direct contact, proliferation was assessed in the cocultures with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes). The cultures were stained with the predetermined optimal concentration of CFSE (2 µM, RPMI 1640) for 20 minutes at 37°C), washed with RPMI 1640 containing 20% fetal calf serum to bind up free CFSE, and cultivated under standard conditions with cytokines for 5 days. Samples were analyzed for staining by gating on the lymphoblast or large cell population with a flow cytometer. Cell division was quantified by measuring equidistant peaks that represented a halving of the fluorescent intensity with the initial peak determined at day 3, a time point taken after the initial nonspecific loss of CFSE had occurred. Transwell cultures CD2-magnetic bead-enriched CTCL cells (1 × 106/mL, results presented from 2 representative cultures) and bead-depleted DCs (1 × 105/mL) were cultured on either side of a 0.40-µm porous membrane (Corning Costar, Cambridge MA) in media containing the standard cytokines. To exclude deleterious effects of contact with the membrane, the positions of the DCs and the CTCL cells were reversed in parallel cultures. Cultures were maintained for 3 weeks and viability monitored by trypan blue exclusion.Antibody-mediated inhibition of CTCL cell-antigen-presenting cell contact Cocultivated cells (1 of 6 cultures) were incubated with monoclonal antibodies (CD3, family-specific V , CD40), used
at predetermined optimal dilutions, approximately 33 µg/mL,
10 × 106cells/100 µL/well. After overnight incubation
with the antibodies, proliferation was measured by uptake of
[3H]-thymidine. Results are the mean of 5 replicates ± SD.
Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Supernatants were harvested from 2-month cultures (3 cultures of 6 tested, 4 days after media replenishment) and the presence of cytokines evaluated with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R & D Systems) to detect tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ), interferon- (IFN- ), IL-10, and IL-15
according to the manufacturer's directions.
To inhibit IL-10, a neutralizing antibody was added to
10 × 106 CTCL cells and 1 × 106 DCs from
2-month cultures (10 ng/mL, R & D Systems) with and without the
addition of 2 × 106 CTCL cells that were rendered
apoptotic by Apoptosis assays Programmed cell death was examined (2 of 6 cultures) at intervals (0, 20, 30, 50 minutes and 24 hours) after the addition of 0.5 mL CD3 (33 µg/mL) or an antibody reactive with the variable region of the CTCL cell's clonotypic TCR. Two-color immunofluorescence was performed, after fixation and permeabilization, using antimouse FITC/APO-2-PE to detect internalized apoptotic T lymphocytes. Annexin V staining was performed to detect early apoptotic cells with a commercially available kit, following the manufacturer's directions (Coulter-Immunotech).Videomicroscopy Cells (1 × 105) from 1- and 2-month cultures were plated within 30 minutes after receiving CD3 antibody (3.3 µg/100 µL) on the uncoated glass surface of a chamber slide (Mattek, Ashland, MA). The cells were maintained at 37°C under a 7% CO2 atmosphere during the 1 hour of filming and observed with a Zeiss Axiovert microscope. Images were filmed with a CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Michigan City, IN) using Open Lab software to produce a Quicktime movie.MLC Normal control responder T cells were purified with CD2-magnetic beads. DCs were enriched from 1- and 2-month cultures by bead-depletion of CD2+ CTCL cells. Control T cells were added to DCs at concentrations of 100, 50, and 25 × 103 responder T cells added to 1 × 103 DCs. Control T cells were added at the same concentrations to allogeneic control B cells and monocytes that had been depleted of T cells. Stimulators were prevented from proliferating by irradiation (2000 rads, cesium irradiator) prior
to the addition of responding T cells. Cultures were incubated for 6 days and received a 16-hour pulse of [3H]-thymidine,
prior to harvesting. Results were calculated as the mean ± SD of
5 replicates (representative results from 1 of 2 normal controls).
Statistics were analyzed with the Student t test.
Characterization of CTCL and antigen-presenting cell cocultures The CTCL cells and DCs were cultured, with supportive cytokines, from leukapheresis specimens obtained from 10 patients on multiple occasions and were routinely maintained in vitro for 3 months. The ability to grow both cell types was entirely reproducible and uniformly successful in all patients.The CTCL cells were unable to proliferate when they were removed from
contact with the antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (Figure 1). Purified CTCL cells obtained from
cultures that had been established for 1 and 3 months from 2 representative CTCL patients did not proliferate during the 72-hour
incubation period, despite the presence of cytokines, unless they were
cultivated in the presence of their autologous APCs.
In addition, when proliferating CTCL cells and DCs were purified from 2-month cultures and separated by a transwell membrane for 2 weeks, their viability declined from 91% ± 0.7% in the cocultures to 57% ± 10% in isolated CTCL cells and 0% in DCs. The viability of the isolated CTCL cells continued to decline until at 3 weeks only a few intact cells were visible. The addition of supernatants from long-term proliferating cocultures did not prolong the growth of the isolated cell populations, supporting the contention that direct membrane contact is required for CTCL cell and DC proliferation. The CTCL cells were morphologically medium-sized lymphocytes clustered
around the APCs (Figure 2A), in a fashion
reminiscent of the Pautrier microabscess. APCs (Figure 2B) formed
groups of nonadherent floating cells as well as adherent cells that
were of large size and had a granular cytoplasm and multiple dendritic extensions. Immunofluorescent staining (Figure 2C) demonstrated many
CD3+ T cells in direct contact with class II+
APCs. The dendritic extensions of the APCs and the close approximation of the T cells to the APCs were clearly visible under phase contrast microscopy (Figure 2D).
CFSE staining demonstrates proliferation of CTCL cells and APCs Because separation of either cell type resulted in rapid cell death, proliferation was evaluated directly in the cocultures by CFSE staining. CFSE staining intensity is halved when the cells replicate, enabling direct quantification of cell division.15 The results are presented as the shift in fluorescence observed at day 5 measured from the initial staining monitored at day 3, a time point chosen because the initial nonspecific loss of CFSE has dissipated.15 Figure 3, panels A and B, demonstrate lymphocyte proliferation in a 1-month culture, followed over 5 days. The shift in CFSE intensity indicates that at least 8 rounds of lymphocyte cell division have occurred. The parallel cocultivated APC population (Figure 3C,D) also demonstrated at least 8 divisions over 5 days, indicating a doubling time of 15 hours for both the tumor cells and the APCs.
Immunophenotype and genotype At 2 months, the CTCL cells retain the phenotype of the neoplastic, clonal, peripheral blood T cells from which they were derived, with the majority of the cells expressing CD3 (100%) and CD4 (99%), lacking CD8 (0%) and, if known, expressing a V -reactive family-specific TCR V 8a (93%). No CD56+ natural killer
cells or CD19+ B cells were identified. PCR studies
demonstrated that cultured CTCL cells, tested at 2 months, retained the
identical TCR- and TCR- chain rearrangements found in the
original peripheral blood isolate (results not shown).
The APC population contained CD14+ monocytes that
represented approximately 40% of the cells at 2 weeks and declined to
less than 10% of the APCs by 1 month of culture. The cultured APCs were reactive with antibodies that detected costimulatory molecules (Figure 4A, CD80: 46%; Figure 4B, CD86:
36%). At 1 month, the APCs were 72% class II reactive (Figure 4C).
The maturing CD83+ DC population represented 30% (Figure
4D) of the APCs. When APCs were tested after 3 months in culture, the
majority of the APCs expressed higher levels of class II (Figure 4E).
Further studies (Table 1) showed that at
3 weeks only 7% of the DCs were mature as shown by CD83 expression on
the cell membrane and cytoplasmic reactivity with DC-LAMP (9% positive
cells). After 2 months of cultivation of cells from the same patient,
the levels of CD83 expression (15%) and DC-LAMP+ (36%)
had increased 2- to 4-fold, indicating continued DC maturation. In
3-month-old cultures from another patient with CTCL, 70% of the DCs
expressed membrane CD83 or cytoplasmic DC-LAMP or both. Overall, at 1 to 2 months of culture the APCs were predominantly immature cells
admixed with approximately 30% mature DCs. By 3 months of culture,
substantial DC maturation had occurred at a time point that preceded
the imminent demise of both the CTCL cells and the APCs.
Confocal microscopic demonstration of DC class II sequestration The DCs obtained from 1- and 2-month cultures were freed of CTCL cells and the expression of the cytoplasmic lysosomal marker lamp and class II MHC molecules monitored. After 1 month of culture (Figure 5A), confocal microscopy revealed an intermediate DC phenotype7 with some lysosomal colocalization of LAMP and class II molecules and a punctate pattern of nonlysosomal class II vesicles (CIIV-like) beneath the plasma membrane. This phenotype has been reported after 1 day to 1 week of culture7 and was still evident in many DCs after 1 month of coculture with CTCL cells, demonstrating delayed maturation. By 2 months of culture (Figure 5B), the punctate pattern of CIIV-like structures and some lysosomal colocalization was still present. Migration of class II molecules to dendritic extensions of the cell membrane also developed indicating increased maturation from the intermediate phenotype toward a late DC phenotype. Fluorescent microscopy confirmed (Figure 5C) that some DCs had maturated at 2 months with expression of a starfishlike morphology, class II on the cell membrane and DC-LAMP in the cytoplasm.
Increased DC maturation enhances MLC stimulation The ability to stimulate an MLC response in normal alloreactive T cells was tested to evaluate DC maturation. Mature DCs are potent stimulators in MLCs due to their expression of high levels of cell membrane class II MHC molecules, whereas immature DCs retain class II molecules in the cytoplasm and are less stimulatory in MLCs.7 The ability of CTCL cell-depleted DCs from 1- and 2-month cultures to stimulate a proliferative response in serially diluted normal control T-cell responders was tested. DCs purified from 2-month cultures were significantly more stimulatory in MLCs (P .001) in comparison to DCs obtained from 1-month
cultures or normal control B cells and monocytes, at all ratios tested (100 × 103, 50 × 103,
10 × 103 CTCL cells: 1 × 103 DCs; results
not shown). DC immaturity at 1 month was confirmed by their inability
to stimulate a response, at all ratios tested, that was significantly
different from that of normal control B cells and monocytes. Therefore,
as indicated by the immunophenotype results, at 1 month of culture the
majority of the DCs were immature cells that can mature into
immunostimulatory DCs at 2 months of culture.
Cytokines produced by the cultured cells may influence DC maturation Supernatants from 2-month cocultures contained cytokines that could affect CTCL cell/APC interaction, including TNF- ,
IFN- , and IL-10 (Table 2). IL-15,
which has been reported to prolong CTCL cell growth, was not found in
the culture supernatants.16 Although CTCL cell production
of TNF- and IFN- may promote DC maturation,17,18
IL-10 production could inhibit DC differentiation.
The addition of
Effect of monoclonal antibodies on proliferation To determine whether the effect of antibodies that prevented CTCL cell and DC interaction, monoclonal antibodies were added to the cocultures and proliferation monitored. CTCL cell proliferation was inhibited by the addition of antibodies that bound to the clonotypic TCR (V antibody) or an anti-CD40 antibody, which reduced the access
of the CTCL cell CD40 ligand to the APC CD40 molecule (Figure
6). CD40 binding may increase DC
maturation and thereby reduce the population of immature DCs, which are
critical for continued CTCL cell proliferation.
CD3 antibody causes apoptotic tumor cell death and secondary necrosis Although resting T cells are stimulated to divide after CD3-TCR triggering, T cells that have entered the cell cycle become apoptotic after CD3 signaling.19 To determine whether the inhibitory effect of CD3 binding on CTCL cell proliferation was due to blocking of TCR interaction or resulted from T-cell depletion, we examined whether binding of anti-CD3 antibody or a clone-specific V -reactive antibody
mediated CTCL cell apoptosis. The basal rate of apoptosis in the CTCL
cell population was 9% (Figure 7) as
shown by the binding of annexin V after incubation with an isotype
control. In addition, 6% of the lymphocytes became secondarily
necrotic. Treatment of CD2-bead-purified CTCL cells with CD3 antibody
for 1 hour resulted in the apoptotic cell death of 19% of the tumor cells (15% necrosis), whereas an antibody to the clonotypic TCR caused
30% of the CTCL cells to undergo programmed cell death (23%
necrosis). Therefore, approximately one third of the antibody-treated CTCL cells in the cultures undergo rapid apoptotic cell death and more
than 20% of the CTCL cells become necrotic. The necrotic cell death
that ensued as a consequence of antibody-mediated apoptosis may result
in the release of inflammatory cytokines contributing to DC
maturation.20
Real-time motion reveals rapid DC phagocytosis of apoptotic CTCL cells To determine the rate of CTCL cell ingestion by autologous cultured DC, we filmed a quick-time phase contrast movie (to view download apple quick time viewer from Netscape download site for both MAC and PC). Cultures from 2 CTCL patients (patient no. 4, 2 months in culture; patient no. 1, 1 month) received CD3 antibody at time 0 and filming continued for 1 hour. The compressed movie demonstrates that as early as 8 minutes (Figure 8A, 8 minutes freeze frame) CTCL cells approximate to the DC membrane, are engulfed by a pseudopodal extension of the DC membrane (Figure 8B, 9 minutes), and are fully internalized by 10 minutes (Figure 8C). Viewing the entire movie demonstrates that some of the DCs are aggressively phagocytic even at 2 months of culture and ingest multiple CTCL cells. The CTCL cells appear to be attracted to the DCs possibly through a chemokine gradient produced by the DC. The results of this very rapid phagocytosis is engorgement of the DC to the point where their cytoplasm becomes distended and appears to be full of apoptotic CTCL cells.
Uptake of apoptotic CTCL cells drives DC differentiation CD3-treated CTCL cells were rendered apoptotic as demonstrated by the binding of APO-2, a marker of early apoptotic cells (Figure 9A). Twenty minutes after binding of the CD3 antibody to purified CTCL cells (T20), 29% of the cells were apoptotic. In control cocultures, neither CD4 antibody, an irrelevant isotype-matched V antibody (V 18), nor an isotype
control caused apoptosis. The impact of this enhanced apoptotic cell
death on DC maturation was studied.
Twenty minutes after the addition of CD3, sequentially timed samples were taken from the DCs, and fixed and permeabilized to allow detection of internalized T cells. In Figure 9A, 2-color flow cytometry demonstrated that at early time points only small numbers of CD3+ apoptotic blebs from CTCL cells were found in the cytoplasm of mature CD83+ DCs. After overnight incubation, 24% of the DC had matured, were membrane CD83+, and contained CD3+ CTCL-derived material. The increase in membrane CD83 expression after overnight incubation with apoptotic CTCL cells was confirmed by 1-color flow cytometry (Figure 9B). An antibody to CD4, which binds to the CTCL cells and is the same isotype as the CD3 antibody (IgG1), did not cause rapid apoptosis or enhanced phagocytic uptake, indicating that Fc receptor-mediated uptake of the antibody-positive CTCL cells did not play a significant role in the observed phagocytosis. DC phagocytosis of CTCL cells increases membrane class I and II expression To examine the impact on the DC of CTCL cell ingestion, MHC class I and II expressions were monitored. Class I (Figure 10A) and class II (Figure 10B) expression on the DCs was substantially increased 24 hours after ingestion of apoptotic CTCL cells. Sequential samples were taken from purified DCs (T0) prior to overnight incubation and after 24 hours of incubation (T24) with autologous purified CTCL cells that had been rendered apoptotic by CD3 binding. DCs from patient 1 (3-week culture) increased the intensity of their class I expression 5-fold and their class II expression 1.8-fold. DCs from 2 patients markedly increased the intensity of their MHC class I and II expression after phagocytosis of apoptotic CTCL cells (Table 4).
The pathognomonic hallmark of CTCL is the intraepidermal Pautrier microabscess, composed of large clusters of CTCL cells that are malignant and in mitosis, surrounding Langerhans cells (an immature DC) both in the epidermis and in dermal infiltrates.21 Although the diagnostic importance of this disease feature has been known for decades, the implications for the immunobiology of CTCL have remained obscure. The ability to investigate the dynamic interaction between the CD4+ CTCL cell and the DC has been limited by difficulties in cultivating CTCL cells. We have established long-term cultures that permit dissection of the interaction between the CTCL cell and the DC. The ability to study both cell types will have significant ramifications for our understanding of the factors that drive the malignant T-cell proliferation in CTCL and may permit the design of innovative therapies. Our studies are the first to report the establishment of long-term cultures of CTCL cells that preserve the phenotype of the initial malignant clone and can be reproducibly propagated, from the leukapheresis of all patients with CTCL tested. Although others have reported CTCL cell growth in vitro,11,16,22 the ability to culture CTCL cells has been limited to selected patients with unusual phenotypes, or HTLV-1 virally transformed cells and the life span of these cell lines was short. In our cultures, the growth, viability, and survival of the CTCL cells is dependent on direct membrane contact with autologous, immature DCs. Separation of the cells by a membrane or the transfer of supernatant fluid from proliferating cultures does not support growth of either isolated cell type for a prolonged period. The prolonged survival of the DCs and their ability to proliferate and remain aggressively phagocytic is another remarkable feature of the culture system. Normally, DCs cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 do not proliferate extensively and do not remain viable beyond 1 month in vitro.12 At 1 to 2 months in culture with CTCL cells, approximately two thirds of the DCs were immature cells capable of aggressive phagocytosis and were admixed with mature DCs. After 3 months in culture the majority of the DCs had matured and begun to degranulate and die. The immaturity of the DC is central to the prolonged growth of the CTCL
cells in the cultures. The CTCL cell may aid in the maintenance of DC
survival, through ligation of CD40 on the DC by CD40 ligand on the
tumor cell, an interaction that has been shown to prolong the survival
of both DCs and antigen-stimulated T cells through enhanced DC
maturation, which increases their ability to present antigen to T
cells.23 In some patients, secretion of the maturation
inhibitory cytokine IL-10 may serve to promote DC immaturity. In
contrast, other cytokines such as TNF- Maturation of DCs is associated with a loss of phagocytic ability.24 The immaturity of the cultured DCs was demonstrated by their ability even after 1 to 2 months of culture to rapidly engulf apoptotic tumor cells. The tumor cells were rendered apoptotic by TCR triggering with CD3 or an antibody to the variable region of the clonotypic TCR. The ability to provoke CD3-mediated apoptotic cell death may reflect the activated status of the proliferating CTCL cells that have entered the cell cycle.19 Although resting T cells proliferate in response to CD3 stimulation, activated T cells undergo apoptotic cell death. We have previously demonstrated that isolated CTCL cells cultured with IL-2 and IL-7 in the absence of DCs do not proliferate and do not undergo apoptosis when stimulated with CD3.25 In contradistinction, the CTCL cells cultured with DCs are proliferating as shown by radioisotope incorporation and CFSE staining, and after antibody-mediated TCR triggering, at least 30% of the CTCL cells will undergo programmed cell death. In the cultured cells, in the absence of antibody-driven apoptosis, gradual DC maturation over a 3-month period was observed and may be due to the uptake of tumor cells that have reached the limit of their proliferative capacity and died. It is possible that DC uptake of dying CTCL cells drives the long-term proliferation of CTCL through 2 potential mechanisms. Maturing DCs express higher levels of class II MHC molecules and murine models have shown that association of mature CD4+ T cells with class II+ DCs supports the survival of the CD4 T cells.26 The DCs may process peptides derived from the engulfed apoptotic CTCL cells and present them in class II MHC molecules to resting CTCL cells, thereby promoting their proliferation. Alternatively, the DCs may release a nonspecific growth factor that drives the CTCL cells to proliferate. However, supernatants from the cultured cells do not support the growth of isolated CTCL cells, indicating that any secreted growth stimulant acts directly on the CTCL cells, does not penetrate a 0.4-µm membrane, and does not survive transfer. Ultimately, when the all the DCs mature and die no further stimulus is provided for the CTCL cells and they die as well. The maturation level of the DCs may have profound influences on the
type of effector CD4 T-cell response initiated. In an alloreactive
model, using naive CD4 T cells isolated from cord blood, stimulation
with immature DCs skewed the T-cell population toward IL-10, producing
IL-2, IL-4, IFN- The quick-time movie images indicate that apoptotic CTCL cells are drawn to the DCs by a mechanism that remains to be elucidated but probably represents a chemoattractive gradient. Epidermal Langerhans cells, migrating from skin after sensitization with antigen, have been shown to up-regulate the expression of macrophage-derived chemokine as they mature,29 drawing antigen-specific T cells to the DCs by chemoattraction. The results obtained in our cultures may be used to construct a theoretical model of how CTCL grows both in vitro and in vivo. In the cultures and in the skin of patients with CTCL, some of the CTCL cells may have already encountered antigen and are actively proliferating. When this proliferative population of CTCL cells undergoes programmed cell death and is engulfed by immature DCs, they drive DC maturation, which may potentiate DC presentation of CTCL peptides to both CD4 and CD8 T cells. The nonproliferating CTCL population may be drawn to the maturing DCs by chemokine expression and exposed to class II presented self-peptide that can drive their entry into the cell cycle, thereby maintaining the growth of the malignancy. As long as the DCs are immature, perpetuated in vivo by renewal from the bone marrow,30 CTCL cell growth will be promoted, suggesting that therapies such as psoralen and UV-A light in the epidermis may mediate their beneficial effect through the depletion of the immature DC population, as well as by a direct impact on CTCL cell proliferation.31,32 Skin Langerhans cells that contain Birbeck granules and express E-cadherin and Lag may represent a separate population from the monocyte-derived DCs studied in our culture system.33 Comparative studies of the impact on CTCL cell growth of these 2 DC subsets will be pursued in future experiments. The restricting element that presents the antigen that stimulates CTCL cell proliferation in the cultures may be class II MHC molecules but is not CD1a, which is expressed by epidermal Langerhans cells but is not found on the cultured immature DCs. The nature of the putative antigen remains to be elucidated. Peptides derived from the CTCL cells themselves are likely candidates and include the clonotypic TCR, which is recognized by autologous CD8 T cells when presented in class I MHC molecules on an APC.34 Transforming retroviruses have been implicated in the ontogeny of CTCL. Reports suggest that HTLV-1-related sequences may be found in the DNA of lymphocytes from some patients with CTCL and in keratinocytes from noninvolved skin.35 The nonproductive retroviral sequences could provide a source of peptide for Langerhans cell presentation to CTCL cells. Alternatively, retroviral products from an unknown virus that infects Langerhans cells or keratinocytes may serve as a source of peptide. It is clear that the long-term cultures will allow investigators to delve more deeply into the factors that drive the proliferation and progression of CTCL. For the first time it will be possible to study the interaction of the malignant CTCL cells and APCs in vitro and measure the factors that either promote or retard the growth of the malignancy. Based on our preliminary observations, we postulate that CTCL may represent an antigen-driven malignancy of CD4 T cells that fails to respond to immunoregulation, due at least in part, to the impact of the malignant T cells on APC maturation. Beyond the significance of these results for normal and tumor cell immunobiology, they raise major opportunities for the design and development of improved immunotherapy. Titration of dose, schedule of administration, and cellular impact of radiation, chemotherapy, antibody, cytokine, and oligonucleotide administration can now be finely tuned in vitro prior to institution in vivo.
Submitted October 9, 2001; accepted December 6, 2001.
Supported by the New York Cardiac Foundation (C.B.), the Dermatology Foundation (D.H.), and grant CA81138 from the National Institutes of Health (to M.D.).
C.L.B. and D.H. have contributed equally to this article and should be considered co-first authors.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Carole L. Berger, Department of Dermatology, Yale University, School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510; e-mail: carole.berger{at}yale.edu.
1. Edelson R, Berger C, Raafat J, Warburton D. Karyotype studies of cutaneous T cell lymphoma: evidence for clonal origin. J Invest Dermatol. 1979;73:548-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Edelson R. Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome and other variants). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980;2:89-106[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Picker L.J, Michie SA, Rott LS, Butcher EC. A unique phenotype of skin-associated lymphocytes in humans: preferential expression of the HECA-452 epitope by benign and malignant T cells at cutaneous sites. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:1053-1068[Abstract]. 4. Broder S, Edelson R, Lutzner M, et al. The Sezary syndrome: a malignant proliferation of helper T cells. J Clin Invest. 1976;58:1297-1306.
5.
Berger CL, Warburton D, Raafat J, Logerfo P, Edelson RL.
Cutaneous T cell lymphoma: neoplasm of T cells with helper activity.
Blood.
1979;53:642-651 6. Edelson RL. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a model for selective immunotherapy. Cancer J. 1998;4:62-71. 7. Pierre P, Turley SJ, Gatti E, et al. Developmental regulation of MHC class II transport in mouse dendritic cells. Nature. 1997;388:787-792[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 8. Rowden G, Phillips TM, Lewis MG, Wilkinson RD. Target role of Langerhans cells in mycosis fungoides: transmission and immuno-electron microscopic studies. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:364-382[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 9. Lutzner M, Edelson R, Schein P, Green I, Kirkpatrick C, Ahmed A. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: the Sézary syndrome, mycosis fungoides and related disorders. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:534-552. 10. Burg G, Rodt H, Grosse-Wilde H, Braun-Falco O. Surface markers and mitogen response of cells harvested from cutaneous infiltrates in mycosis fungoides and Sézary's syndrome. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;70:257-259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Dalloul A, Laroche L, Bagot M, et al. Interleukin-7 is a growth factor for Sézary lymphoma cells. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1054-1060.
12.
Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A.
Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and down regulated by tumor necrosis factor- 13. Berger CL, Xu A-L, Hanlon D, et al. Induction of human tumor-loaded dendritic cells. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:438-447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Berger CL, Wang N, Christensen I, Longley J, Heald P, Edelson RL. The immune response to class I-associated tumor-specific cutaneous T-cell lymphoma antigens. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107:392-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 15. Hasbold J, Gett A, Rush JS. Quantitative analysis of lymphocyte differentiation and proliferation in vitro using carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester. Immunol Cell Biol. 1999;77:516-522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Dôbbeling U, Dummer R, Laine E, Potoczna N, Qin J-Z, Burg G.
Interleukin-15 is an autocrine/paracrine viability factor for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cells.
Blood.
1998;92:252-258
17.
Brossart P, Zohywalski A.
Grünebach. F, et al. Tumor necrosis factor
18.
Ito T, Amakawa R, Inaba M, Ikchara S, Knaba K, Fukuhara S.
Differential regulation of human blood dendritic cell subsets by IFNs.
J Immunol.
2001;166:2961-2969
19.
Karas M, Zaks TZ, JL L, LeRoith D.
T cell receptor-induced activation and apoptosis in cycling human T cells occur throughout the cell cycle.
Mol Biol Cell.
1999;10:4441-4450
20.
Sauter B, Albert ML, Francisco L, Larsson M, Somersan S, Bhardwaj N.
Consequences of cell death: exposure to necrotic tumor cells but not primary tissue cells or apoptotic cells, induces the maturation of immunostimulatory dendritic cells.
J Exp Med.
2000;191:423-433 21. Chu A, Patterson JAK, Berger CL, Vonderheid E, Edelson RL. In situ study of T-cell subpopulations in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cancer. 1984;54:2414-2422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Abrams JT, Lessin SR, Gosh SK, et al. Malignant and nonmalignant T cell lines from human T cell lymphotropic virus I-negative patients with Sézary syndrome. J Immunol. 1991;146:1455-1462[Abstract]. 23. Miga AJ, Masters SR, Durell BG, et al. Dendritic cell longevity and T cell persistence is controlled by CD154-CD40 interactions. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:959-965[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
24.
Stuhler G, Zobywalski A, Grünebach F, et al.
Immune regulatory loops determine productive interactions within human T lymphocyte-dendritic cell clusters.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:1532-1535 25. Fargnoli M-C, Edelson RL, Berger CL, et al. Diminished TCR signaling in cutaneous T cell lymphoma is associated with decreased activities of Zap70, Syk and membrane-associated Csk. Leukemia. 1997;11:1338-1346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Brocker T.
Survival of mature CD4 T lymphocytes is dependent on major histocompatibility complex class II-expressing dendritic cells.
J Exp Med.
1997;186:1223-1232 27. Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Schuler G, Knop J, Enk AH. Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4+ T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2000;92:1213-1222.
28.
Shevach EM.
Certified professionals: CD4+CD25+ suppressor T cells.
J Exp Med.
2001;193:F41-F45
29.
Tang HL, Cyster JG.
Chemokine up-regulation and activated T cell attraction by maturing dendritic cells.
Science.
1999;284:819-822 30. Katz SI, Tamaki K, Sachs DH. Epidermal Langerhans cells are derived from cells originating in bone marrow. Nature. 1979;282:324-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 31. Gilchrest BA, Parrish JA, Tanenbaum L, Haynes HA, Fitzpatrick TB. Oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy of mycosis fungoides. Cancer. 1976;38:683-689[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 32. Bestak R, Haliday G. Chronic low-dose UVA irradiation induces local suppression of contact hypersensitivity, Langerhans cell depletion and suppressor cell activation in C3H/Hej mice. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;64:969-974[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
33.
Caux C, Massacrier C, Dubois B, et al.
Respective involvement of TGF- 34. Berger CL, Longley BJ, Imaeda S, Christensen I, Heald P, Edelson RL. Tumor-specific peptides in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: association with class I major histocompatibility complex and possible derivation from the clonotypic T-cell receptor. Int J Cancer. 1998;76:304-311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 35. Khan ZM, Sebenik M, Zucker-Franklin D. Localization of human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 tax proviral sequence in skin biopsies of patients with mycosis fungoides by in situ polymerase chain reaction. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;106:667-672[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
M. C. Picchio, E. Scala, D. Pomponi, E. Caprini, M. Frontani, I. Angelucci, A. Mangoni, C. Lazzeri, M. Perez, D. Remotti, et al. CXCL13 Is Highly Produced by Sezary Cells and Enhances Their Migratory Ability via a Synergistic Mechanism Involving CCL19 and CCL21 Chemokines Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7137 - 7146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Guitart and C. Magro Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoid Dyscrasia: A Unifying Term for Idiopathic Chronic Dermatoses With Persistent T-Cell Clones Arch Dermatol, July 1, 2007; 143(7): 921 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Vonderheid and W. Matsui Do Neoplastic Stem Cells Underlie the Pathogenesis of Cutaneous Lymphomas? Arch Dermatol, May 1, 2005; 141(5): 641 - 642. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Querfeld, S. T. Rosen, T. M. Kuzel, K. A. Kirby, H. H. Roenigk Jr, B. M. Prinz, and J. Guitart Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Achieved Complete Remission With Psoralen Plus UV-A Monotherapy Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2005; 141(3): 305 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Berger, R. Tigelaar, J. Cohen, K. Mariwalla, J. Trinh, N. Wang, and R. L. Edelson Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: malignant proliferation of T-regulatory cells Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1640 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Girardi, P. W. Heald, and L. D. Wilson The Pathogenesis of Mycosis Fungoides N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 2004; 350(19): 1978 - 1988. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Maier, A. Tun-Kyi, A. Tassis, K.-P. Jungius, G. Burg, R. Dummer, and F. O. Nestle Vaccination of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma using intranodal injection of autologous tumor-lysate-pulsed dendritic cells Blood, October 1, 2003; 102(7): 2338 - 2344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||