Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 110, Issue 7, 2620-2630, October 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Epstein Barr virus–specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes expressing the anti-CD30{zeta} artificial chimeric T-cell receptor for immunotherapy of Hodgkin disease
Blood Savoldo et al. 110: 2620

Supplemental materials for: Savoldo et al, Vol 110, Issue 7, 2620-2630

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Figure S1. Cytotoxic activity of CD30CAR+ CTLs (JPG, 51.5 KB) -
    (A,B) Cytotoxic activity of control and CD30CAR+ Epstein Barr virus-specific cytotixic T-lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs), respectively, from a representative healthy donor. (C,D) Cytotoxic activity of control and CD30CAR+ EBV-CTLs, respectively, generated from a representative HD patient. The graphs illustrate the percent-specific lysis of the CTLs against: autologous LCL lines (♦), HLA-mismatched LCLs (■), the two CD30+ cell lines HDLM-2 (△) and Karpas-299 (*), a CD30-negative target cell line (○), and autologous PHA blasts (●). Shown are data with more detailed titration (from 40:1 to 5:1 Effector:Target ratios).





  • Figure S2. Cytotoxic activity of CD30CAR+ CTLs against PHA blasts (JPG, 68.6 KB) -
    (A) CD30 expression, evaluated by FACS, on PHA blasts on day 4 and day 8 of culture and of genetically modified blasts stably expressing CD30 (as described in “Patients, materials, and methods, Evaluation of cytotoxic activity”) for one representative of 3 donors. These cells were then labeled with 51Cr and used as targets in a standard cytotoxicity assay. (B) Percent-specific lysis of CD30CAR+ CTLs against these targets. Killing of cells that highly expressed CD30 occurs, while CD30 negative/low cells are not lysed.





  • Figure S3. Killing of CD30 overexpressing T cells by CD30CAR (JPG, 61 KB) -
    (A) Expression of the CD30 molecule on PHA blasts, T blasts transduced with a retroviral vector to stably express the CD30 antigen and HDLM-2, an HD cell line constitutively expressing the CD30 antigen. (B) Percent of specific killing by control and CD30CAR+ CTLs against these targets as assessed in a standard 51Cr release assay. Shown is the 20:1 Effector:Target ratio. CD30 overexpressing blasts are lysed at a comparable level as HDLM-2.





  • Figure S4. Evaluation of bioluminescent signal and expansion of T cells (JPG, 51.8 KB) -
    Mice with differing bioluminescence signals at the tumor site were killed, and the cells isolated and stained with anti-human CD3 and CD45 MAbs. (A) Mice with higher bioluminescence intensity (3 × 107 p/s/cm2/sr) also had higher numbers of CD3+ T cells (∼40%). (B) Intermediate intensity (5 × 106 p/s/cm2/sr). The number of T cells in this case was lower (∼20% of CD3+ T cells). (C) A mouse with no measurable bioluminescence (1 × 105) and correspondingly negligible CD3+ T cells (<0.5%).





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020