Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 110, Issue 1, 251-258, July 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

CD4 engagement by CD1d potentiates activation of CD4+ invariant NKT cells
Blood Thedrez et al. 110: 251

Supplemental materials for: Thedrez et al, Vol 110, Issue 1, 251-258

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Document 1. Supplemental materials and methods (PDF, 114 KB)

  • Figure S1. CD1d surface expression levels on human LCL C1R and mouse T lymphoma RMA/S cells (JPG, 63.1 KB) -
    Cell lines were stained with PE-conjugate human CD1d-specific mAb (Becton Dickinson), and analyzed by flow cytometry. Stainings of cells incubated with isotype antibody (Becton Dickinson) are used as negative controls (filled).





  • Figure S2. Phenotypic characterization of human iNKT-cell clones isolated from a single healthy donor (JPG, 80.4 KB) -
    (A) Nucleotide sequence and predicted amino acid sequence of V24-J18 (TCR) and V11-D1-J2 (TCR) junctional transcripts derived from the human iNKT-cell clones 20.22 and 20.49. CDR3 amino acid sequences are underlined. “N” refers to nongermline nucleotides. (B) V24/V11 TCR (left panel) and CD4 coreceptor (right panel) expression levels of human iNKT-cell clones 20.49 and 20.22. Results are representative of at least 5 independent experiments.





  • Figure S3. Cytokine secretion profiles of human iNKT-cell clones 20.22 (DN) and 20.49 (CD4+) (JPG, 80.5 KB) -
    (A) IFN- and IL-4 production following nonspecific stimulation. Human iNKT-cell clones 20.22 (open histograms) and 20.49 (filled histograms) were stimulated for 5 hours in the following conditions: no stimulation (Non Stim.), PMA and ionomycin (PMA/Iono) and anti-CD3 mAb (T3 clone; -CD3). Cytokine expression was then evaluated by flow cytometry following cell permeabilization. Fluorescence intensity is indicated in the y axis and the percentage of positive cells is indicated on the top of each histogram. (B) IFN- and IL-4 production following -GalCer/CD1d stimulation. HeLa CD1d cells were pulsed with 10−5 µg/mL -GalCer and used to stimulate NKT cells, which were further permeabilized and stained with antibodies to CD4, IFN-, and IL-4. The percentage of cytokine-producing cells and the cytokine mean fluorescence intensity value (mfi) are shown in the quadrants. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments.





  • Figure S4. Anti-CD4 mAbs specifically modulate the reactivity of CD4+ iNKT-cell clone 20.49 (JPG, 87.7 KB) -
    Effect of anti-CD4 mAbs on cytolytic activity of iNKT-cell clones. Four hours’ 51Cr release assays: effector-target ratios of 1:1 and 10:1 were used, and control IgG (diamonds) or anti-CD4 mAbs (squares: 6D10 and triangles: 13B8) were added at 5 µg/mL to show their effect on HeLa CD1d lysis pulsed with either DMSO (open symbols), 10−3 and 10−5 µg/mL (black symbols) or -GalCer. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.





  • Figure S5. Anti-CD4 mAb modulates α-GalCer-loaded CD1d tetramer binding on human iNKT-cell polyclonal populations (JPG, 96.1 KB) -
    (A) B7 and B9 polyclonal NKT-cell populations (> 95% purity) were stained with anti-CD4 mAb (BL4; 5 µg/mL). Percentage of CD4+ cells is indicated (left panel). Cells were then preincubated with either control IgG or anti-CD4 mAb (BL4; 5 µg/mL) and further incubated with either anti-CD3 mAb (middle panel; dotted line: CD3 staining isotype; light line: control IgG; solid line: anti-CD4) or 10 nM -GalCer–loaded CD1d tetramer (light line: control IgG; solid line: anti-CD4). (B) MAD11 polyclonal invNKT-cell population (> 95% purity) isolated from a healthy donor was stained with either anti-CD4 mAb (top left panel) or -GalCer–loaded CD1d tetramer at 10 nM (top right panel). Sorted CD4 and CD4+ cell subsets were isolated by immunomagnetic sort (left panel: CD4 staining) and incubated with -GalCer–loaded CD1d tetramer (right panel) in the presence of control IgG (filled histograms) or anti-CD4 mAb (BL4 at 5 µg/mL) (open histograms).





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020