Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 110, Issue 12, 4077-4085, December 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Kupffer cell heterogeneity: functional properties of bone marrow–derived and sessile hepatic macrophages
Blood Klein et al. 110: 4077

Supplemental materials for: Klein et al

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Figure S1. Controls of the immunohistological staining protocol (JPG, 61.1 KB) -
    (A) Liver sections from naive B6.CD45.2 animals were stained with unconjugated F4/80 mAb which were consecutively labeled with a secondary Alexa 546-conjugated anti-rat antibody (red). Positively stained cells are abundant in the intra-sinusoidal compartment and display an elongated morphology characteristic of Kupffer cells. (B) Sections stained only with the secondary Alexa 546-conjugated anti-rat antibody without the primary F4/80 mAb showed no non-specific binding of the conjugated antibody. To exclude non-specific binding of the congenic mAbs anti-CD45.2 and anti CD45.1 in experimental bone marrow chimeras or liver transplant recipients, the immunohistological staining protocol (F4/80 + secondary Alexa 546 mAb; anti-CD45.2 FITC and anti-CD45.1 Cy5 – displayed in false color blue) was used in naive B6.CD45.2 (C) and B6.CD45.1 (D). CD45.1-positive Kupffer cells appear in purple, whereas CD45.2-positive Kupffer cells are orange. There was no non-specific CD45.1 staining in B6.CD45.2 mice (C) and no non-specific CD45.2 staining in B6.CD45.1 animals (D). This set of positive and negative staining controls validates the immunohistologic technique that was used to identify persistent “sessile” Kupffer cells in bone-marrow chimeras (Figure 2) and liver transplant recipients (Figure 7).





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020