Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 111, Issue 7, 3479-3488, April 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

A proangiogenic peptide derived from vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 acts through {alpha}5β1 integrin
Blood Soro et al. 111: 3479

Supplemental materials for: Soro et al

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Document 1. Supplemental materials and methods (PDF, 71.8 KB)

  • Figure S1. HUVEC were pre-incubated with peptide 12 or peptide 1, as a negative control, and then loaded into Boyden chambers to analyze migration towards VEGFR-1/Fc or fibronectin (FN) (JPG, 22.2 KB) -
    Data represent the mean of twelve microscopic fields and are indicated as percentage of inhibition with respect to migration observed in the absence of the peptides ± s.e.m.





  • Figure S2. HUVEC were incubated on 24-well plates pre-coated with a type I collagen gel mixture (JPG, 132 KB) -
    In the presence of VEGF-A (panels A, B, and F) and of a function blocking antibody against VEGFR-1 (AF321, panel (A), an antibody raised against the VEGFR-1 amino acid sequence including that of peptide 12 (panel B), or VEGFR-1/Fc (panel F). The two antibodies and VEGFR-1/Fc were also used in the assay in the absence of VEGF-A (panels C, D, and E, respectively). To analyze the role of growth factors in peptide 12-mediated tubule formation, the function blocking antibody against VEGFR-1 or VEGFR-1/Fc were used in the presence of peptide 12 (panels G and H, respectively). Results are representative of three independent experiments. Bars: 50 µm.





  • Figure S3 (JPG, 81 KB) -
    In the left panels, representative histological pictures taken at day 17 of the neovascular growth induced by peptide 12, Y220A peptide (100 µg/pellet each), and VEGF-A (400 ng/pellet). In the right panels, the same samples were immunostained with an antibody against PECAM/CD31 to visualize vessels. EP: corneal epithelium. Arrows indicate newly formed vessels, 18× original magnification.





  • Figure S4. Peptide 12 (100 µg) and VEGF-A (300 ng) were co-released from adjacent pellets in the corneal stroma (JPG, 26 KB) -
    Data are reported as angiogenic score calculated at day 17. Numbers are means ± s.e.m. of 6 implants for each experimental point. *P<0.05 peptide 12 + VEGF-A versus VEGF-A or peptide 12 alone (Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test after ANOVA analysis).





  • Figure S5 (JPG, 146 KB) -
    (A) Animals were implanted with 100 µg/pellet of peptide 12 in one eye and with 300 ng/pellet of VEGF-A in the other one. The angiogenic effect of peptide 12 (panel a) was blocked by Bevacizumab (panel b, 4 negative implants out of 4 performed, day 10), and significantly inhibited by Sunitinib (panel c, 1 positive implant out of 4 performed, day 10). Overlapping results were obtained with VEGF-A with 4 negative implants out of 4 performed, at day 10 in the Bevacizumab group (compare panel d and e), and 1 positive implants out of 4 performed, at day 10 in the Sunitinib group (compare panel d and f). Data are reported in (B) for peptide 12 and in (C) for VEGF-A as angiogenic score (means ± SEM) during time (days). P<0.01 peptide 12 alone versus Bevacizumab or Sunitinib treatment at all time points (B), and VEGF-A alone versus Bevacizumab treatment at day 6 and 10 (C); P<0.05 VEGF-A alone versus Sunitinib treatment at day 10 (C) (Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test after ANOVA analysis).





  • Figure S6 (JPG, 29.6 KB) -
    (A) K562 cells or HUVEC were cultured in the presence of fetal calf serum (lane 1 and 4, respectively). K562 were also activated with 5 mM MnCl2 and let adhere on fibronectin-coated dishes (lane 2), or incubated with 20 µg/ml fibronectin in suspension (lane 3). HUVEC were also let to adhere on fibronectin (lane 5). Cell lysates from were immunoprecipitated with an anti-VEGFR-1 antibody directed against the intracellular region of the receptor, and blots were probed with an anti-1 integrin antibody (clone JB1A, Chemicon, upper panel10). Data show the results of a representative experiment. (B) RT-PCR analysis of human ERG (top panel) and -actin (bottom panel) transcripts in K562 cell lines and HUVEC.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020