Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 112, Issue 5, 1876-1885, September 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed to the preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) target chronic myeloid leukemia
Blood Quintarelli et al. 112: 1876

Supplemental materials for: Quintarelli et al

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Figure S1. Peptide titration experiments for PRAME-specific CTLs generation (JPG, 30 KB) -
    The optimal peptide concentration for the generation of PRAME-specific T cells was determined in preliminary titration experiments loading pAPCs and aAPCs with decreasing concentration of PRAME-peptides (from 50 to 0.05 µM). The figure shows the titration of ALY-peptide for the generation of ALY-specific CTLs in one representative HLA-A*02 donor, using a specific IFN-γ ELIspot assay. CTLs generated using 5µM of ALY-peptide produced significant higher numbers of IFNγ+ SFC when stimulated with the specific peptide (black bars) as compared to CTLs generated using 0.5 or 0.05 µM of the same peptide (85 ± 6 IFNγ+ SFC/1 × 105 cells vs. 12 ± 2 IFNγ+ SFC/1 × 105 or 25 ± 9 IFNγ+ SFC/1 × 105, respectively). The number of IFNγ+ SFC was negligible when T cells were tested in ELIspot assay using media alone (white bars) or an irrelevant peptide (gray bars).





  • Figure S2. Generation of CTLs specific for other tumor associated antigens (JPG, 59.5 KB) -
    Using the same culture conditions optimized for the generation of PRAME-CTLs we evaluated whether this approach could be extended to generate CTL targeting other TAA. (A) shows the frequency of IFNγ+ T cells, using the Elispot assay, in CTL lines generated from HLA-A*02+ healthy donors against peptides derived from the following TAA: WT1 (RMFPNAPYL), MART-1 (ELAGIGILTV), Tyr (RLVDDFLLV), PR3 (VLQELNVTV), MAGE-A3 (KVAELVHFL) and hTERT (ILAKFLMWL and RLVDDFLLV). Numbers on the bars indicate the number of donors for whom CTL lines were successfully generated. (B–C) show the specificity and functionality of ELA-specific CTLs generated from a representative healthy donor. Tetramer staining and cytotoxic activity are shown in panel B and C, respectively.





  • Figure S3. Sensitivity of PRAME-CTLs healthy donor-derived by peptide titration (JPG, 40.6 KB) -
    (A) Since only two out of nine PRAME-CTL lines showed specific binding with the ALY-tetramer at FACS analysis, we incubated ALY-tetramer+ CTLs (black bars) and ALY-tetramer negative CTLs (gray bars) with decreasing concentration of ALY-peptide (from 200 to 0.02 nM) to characterize their αβTCR avidivty. The figure shows that ALY-tetramer+ CTLs produced significant higher numbers of IFNγ+ SFC at the 0.2 nM peptide concentration as compared to ALY-tetramer negative CTLs (600 IFNγ+ SFC/1 × 105 cells vs. 35 ± 8 IFNγ+ SFC/1 × 105). In addition, (B) shows that PRAME-specific T cell lines generated from two CML patients (#3 and #1) produced IFNγ+ SFC only if exposed to more than 2 nM peptide concentration.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020