Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts

Blood, Vol. 113, Issue 8, 1651-1660, February 19, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Peripheral blood lymphocytes genetically modified to express the self/tumor antigen MAGE-A3 induce antitumor immune responses in cancer patients
Blood Fontana et al. 113: 1651

Supplemental materials for: Fontana et al

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Table S1. Patient HLA typing (PDF, 491 KB)

  • Figure S1. Imaging of patient CIP-26 before and after treatment (JPG, 41.5 KB) -
    Pt CIP-26 underwent PET scan imaging before and after the vaccination treatment. During the 2nd cycle of the treatment (7th infusion) the patient experienced a complete clinical response (PET scan, November 2004).





  • Figure S2. Identification of the MAGE-A3.A26 and B44 epitopes recognized by MAGE-A3-specific effectors of patient CIP-5 (JPG, 72 KB) -
    (A) MAGE-A3 cDNA fragments were obtained by enzymatic digestions with the restriction enzymes BglII, and either EcoRI, BamHI or HindIII. (B, C) MAGE-A3 cDNA fragments obtained by the enzymatic digestions were transfected in Cos-7 cells together with either HLA-A*2603 or -B*4402 cDNA alleles (B, C). Effectors cells recognized the BglII/EcoRI fragment but not the BglII/BamHI, indicating that the candidate peptide was contained in the 886–979 cDNA region. MAGE-3.A26 and -B44 effectors recognized Cos-7 cells transfected with either allele and pulsed with MAGE-A3250–258 peptide predicted by the SYFPETHI software (B, C).





  • Figure S3. Dynamics of antitumor T cells frequency in patient CIP-5 (JPG, 74.9 KB) -
    PBMCs collected at different time points were stimulated with irradiated autologous tumor cells in limiting dilution conditions and tested for IFN-γ release against autologous tumor, activated T cells, and the NK target K562, after three weekly stimulations. Spontaneous antitumor effectors turned out to be 1.0 × 10−4 before vaccination and varied between 3.8 × 10–5 and 1.0 × 10–4 T cells during the course of the treatment. Frequency of anti–MelanA/MART-1.A2 and anti–MAGE-1.A26 T cells was estimated by the stimulation of multiple groups (105) of PBMCs with either the peptide (i.e. MelanA/MART-1.A2 or MAGE-1.A26), followed after 2 weeks by tetramer staining and IFN-γ release assay. Since the MelanA/MART-1.A26 peptide is unknown, the frequency of anti–MelanA/MART-1.A26 T cells was estimated by PBMC stimulation with tumor cells, followed by IFN-γ release assay on Cos-7 cells transfected with HLA-A26 and MelanA/MART-1 cDNAs. Anti–MelanA/MART-1.A2 effectors in the pre-vaccination sample were found at frequencies of 1.4 × 10–5 whereas after the treatment they varied from 2.5 × 10–6 to 1.2 × 10–6 among CD3+ lymphocytes. The frequencies of the anti MAGE-1.A26 effectors were 3.4 × 10–6 in the pre-vaccination sample, whereas they varied from 4.0 × 10−6 to 3.8 × 10−7 after vaccination. Even if stimulation with tumor cells may underestimate T-cell frequency compared to peptide stimulation, anti–MelanA/MART-1.A26 effectors were found to be approximately 5.4 × 10−5 in the pre-vaccination sample. They decreased after 14 infusions to 8.9 × 10−6, and then strongly increased up to 1 × 10−4 one year after the 15th infusion. After that they remained around 5 × 10−5 during the entire follow up. P stands for post-infusion.





  • Figure S4. Comparison of anti–MAGE-A3.A26 frequency among TILs collected pre and post-treatment (JPG, 128 KB) -
    (A) Detection of anti–MAGE-A3.A26 T cells in TILs collected from a pre-treatment tumor sample of patient CIP-5. TILs were stimulated with M3-GML at 104 cells/well in the presence of IL-2 and IL-7. The microcultures were stimulated on days 7 and 14 in the same conditions. On day 21 cells were stained with MAGE-A3.A26 tetramer-PE and anti–CD8-FITC mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Analysis of anti–MAGE-3.A26 precursor cells in TILs collected from a post-treatment tumor sample of CIP-5 and analyzed as in A. (C) The specificity of the post-treatment microcultures described in B was assessed by IFN-γ release assay at day 21 on UT-GML, autologous tumor cells (CIP-5 mel), Cos-7 cells transfected with HLA-A26 alone or together with MAGE-A3.





  • Figure S5. Molecular analysis of circulating and tumor-infiltrating anti–MAGE-A3.A26 T cells in patient CIP-5 (JPG, 87.5 KB) -
    (A) Anti–MAGE-A3.A26 effectors isolated by MAGE-3.A26 tetramer from peripheral blood and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes of patient CIP-5, were analyzed by FACS and by RT-PCR for TCR Vβ chains usage. Both populations turned out to be Vβ7.1. (B) PCR products containing CDR3 region from both populations were sequenced and resulted to be identical. Anti–MAGE-3.A26 effectors expressed the Vβ7-J2.1 chain.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020