|
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 1, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0354.
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, 1 December 2002, Vol. 100, No. 12, pp. 3869-3876
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
Outcome after induction chemotherapy for older patients
with acute myeloid leukemia is not improved with mitoxantrone and
etoposide compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin: a Southwest Oncology
Group study
Jeanne E. Anderson,
Kenneth
J. Kopecky,
Cheryl L. Willman,
David Head,
Margaret R. O'Donnell,
Frederick W. Luthardt,
Thomas
H. Norwood,
I-Ming Chen,
Stanley P. Balcerzak,
David B. Johnson, and
Frederick R. Appelbaum
From the Katmai Oncology Group, Anchorage, AK;
Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center and the Puget Sound
Oncology Consortium, Seattle, WA; University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; City
of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Ohio State University
Health Center, Columbus, OH; and Wichita Community Clinical Oncology
Program, KS.
Complete remission and long-term survival rates are low for older
adults treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because of favorable
phase 2 data using mitoxantrone and etoposide, we conducted a phase 3 study (SWOG-9333) in which patients over 55 years of age with
previously untreated AML were randomized to receive mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 per day × 5) and etoposide (100 mg/m2
per day × 5) [ME], or cytarabine (200 mg/m2 per
day × 7) and daunorubicin (45 mg/m2 per day × 3) [AD] as induction therapy. The randomization was stratified by
age, onset of leukemia, and multidrug resistance phenotype. Over a
4-year period, 328 eligible patients from 66 institutions were
enrolled. The complete remission rate was 34% (95% confidence
interval [CI] 26%-41%) for patients in the ME and 43% (CI
35%-51%) for patients in the AD treatment arm (one-tailed P value .96). The rates of resistant disease were 43% (CI
35%-51%) and 34% (CI 27%-42%), respectively, for the 2 treatment
arms (one-tailed P value .95). The estimated overall
survival at 2 years was 11% (CI 6%-15%) and 19% (CI 12%-25%) for
patients randomized to ME and to AD induction therapy, respectively
(one-tailed P value .99). After accounting for the
independent prognostic factors associated with survival (karyotype,
performance status, age, white blood cell count), exploratory analysis
suggested there was a worse survival for patients who received ME
compared with AD induction therapy (2-tailed P value
.0066). We conclude that the results of our study do not demonstrate
any benefit to the use of ME induction chemotherapy instead of AD in
older patients with AML.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Greshock, J. Cheng, D. Rusnak, A. M. Martin, R. Wooster, T. Gilmer, K. Lee, B. L. Weber, and T. Zaks
Genome-wide DNA copy number predictors of lapatinib sensitivity in tumor-derived cell lines
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
April 1, 2008;
7(4):
935 - 943.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Pigneux, V. Perreau, E. Jourdan, N. Vey, N. Dastugue, F. Huguet, J.-J. Sotto, L. R. Salmi, N. Ifrah, and J. Reiffers
Adding lomustine to idarubicin and cytarabine for induction chemotherapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: the BGMT 95 trial results
Haematologica,
October 1, 2007;
92(10):
1327 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Estey
Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Older Patients
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2007;
25(14):
1908 - 1915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kuptsova, K. J. Kopecky, J. Godwin, J. Anderson, A. Hoque, C. L. Willman, M. L. Slovak, and C. B. Ambrosone
Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and therapeutic outcomes of AML patients from SWOG clinical trials
Blood,
May 1, 2007;
109(9):
3936 - 3944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Wilson, G. S. Davidson, S. B. Martin, E. Andries, J. Potter, R. Harvey, K. Ar, Y. Xu, K. J. Kopecky, D. P. Ankerst, et al.
Gene expression profiling of adult acute myeloid leukemia identifies novel biologic clusters for risk classification and outcome prediction
Blood,
July 15, 2006;
108(2):
685 - 696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Faderl, S. Verstovsek, J. Cortes, F. Ravandi, M. Beran, G. Garcia-Manero, A. Ferrajoli, Z. Estrov, S. O'Brien, C. Koller, et al.
Clofarabine and cytarabine combination as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients 50 years of age or older
Blood,
July 1, 2006;
108(1):
45 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Stirewalt, K. J. Kopecky, S. Meshinchi, J. H. Engel, E. L. Pogosova-Agadjanyan, J. Linsley, M. L. Slovak, C. L. Willman, and J. P. Radich
Size of FLT3 internal tandem duplication has prognostic significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
May 1, 2006;
107(9):
3724 - 3726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Appelbaum, H. Gundacker, D. R. Head, M. L. Slovak, C. L. Willman, J. E. Godwin, J. E. Anderson, and S. H. Petersdorf
Age and acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
May 1, 2006;
107(9):
3481 - 3485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Latagliata, V. Bongarzoni, I. Carmosino, A. Mengarelli, M. Breccia, P. A. Borza, M. D'Andrea, G. M. D'Elia, S. Mecarocci, S. G. Morano, et al.
Acute myelogenous leukemia in elderly patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy: the dark side of the moon
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2006;
17(2):
281 - 285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Stock
Controversies in Treatment of AML: Case-based Discussion
Hematology,
January 1, 2006;
2006(1):
185 - 191.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Tallman, D. G. Gilliland, and J. M. Rowe
Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia
Blood,
August 15, 2005;
106(4):
1154 - 1163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Chen, C.-F. Yang, M.-H. Yang, K.-D. Lee, W.-K. Kwang, J.-Y. You, Y.-B. Yu, C.-H. Ho, C.-H. Tzeng, W.-K. Chau, et al.
Pretreatment prognostic factors and treatment outcome in elderly patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2005;
16(8):
1366 - 1373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W. Cooper, G. J. Veal, T. Radivoyevitch, M. J. Tilby, H. J. Meyerson, H. M. Lazarus, O. N. Koc, R. J. Creger, G. Pearson, G. M. Nowell, et al.
A Phase I and Pharmacodynamic Study of Fludarabine, Carboplatin, and Topotecan in Patients With Relapsed, Refractory, or High-Risk Acute Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2004;
10(20):
6830 - 6839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Rowe, D. Neuberg, W. Friedenberg, J. M. Bennett, E. Paietta, A. Z. Makary, J. L. Liesveld, C. N. Abboud, G. Dewald, F. A. Hayes, et al.
A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Blood,
January 15, 2004;
103(2):
479 - 485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|