| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 15 August 2005, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 1495-1500. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on May 5, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4557.
TRANSPLANTATION Prospective evaluation of 2 acute graft-versus-host (GVHD) grading systems: a joint Société Française de Greffe de Moëlle et Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC), Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), and International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) prospective studyFrom the Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Grenoble, France; International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Nantes, France; Hematology Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Hematology Department, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Hematology Department, Angers, France; Hematology Department, Lille, France; Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
The most commonly used grading system for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was introduced 30 years ago by Glucksberg; a revised system was developed by the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) in 1997. To prospectively compare the 2 classifications and to evaluate the effect of duration and severity of aGVHD on survival, we conducted a multicenter study of 607 patients receiving T-cell-replete allografts, scored weekly for aGVHD in 18 transplantation centers. Sixty-nine percent of donors were HLA-identical siblings and 28% were unrelated donors. The conditioning regimen included total body irradiation in 442 (73%) patients. The 2 classifications performed similarly in explaining variability in survival by aGVHD grade, although the Glucksberg classification predicted early survival better. There was less physician bias or error in assigning grades with the IBMTR scoring system. With either system, only the maximum observed grade had prognostic significance for survival; neither time of onset nor progression from an initially lower grade of aGVHD was associated with survival once maximum grade was considered. Regardless of scoring system, aGVHD severity accounted for only a small percentage of observed variation in survival. Validity of these results in populations receiving peripheral blood transplants or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens remains to be tested. (Blood. 2005;106:1495-1500)
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||