Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Erratum for Waddington et al., Blood 104 (9) 2714-2721.
Erratum for Waddington et al., Blood 101 (4) 1359-1366.
Blood, 1 March 2006, Vol. 107, No. 5, pp. 1750.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

ERRATUM

In the article by Waddington et al entitled "In utero gene transfer of human factor IX to fetal mice can induce postnatal tolerance of the exogenous clotting factor," which appeared in the February 15, 2003, issue of Blood (Volume 101:1359-1366) and in the article by Waddington et al entitled "Permanent phenotypic correction of hemophilia B in immunocompetent mice by prenatal gene therapy," which appeared in the November 1, 2004, issue of Blood (Volume 104:2714-2721), human factor IX concentrations in murine plasma samples were measured using a commercial sandwich ELISA (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). A standard curve was constructed based on doubling serial dilutions of standard human factor IX:Ag standard supplied in the kit. A second-order polynomial regression curve was fitted to the plot of absorbance versus factor IX concentration, and sample concentrations were calculated from the regression equation. But due to a typographical error in the manufacturer's instructions, the concentration of the standard was interpreted to be half its actual value. Therefore all sample values were, in fact, reported erroneously as half their true concentration. Nevertheless, all conclusions drawn in the studies remain valid as this error was consistent throughout.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020