| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 5 February 2009, Vol. 113, No. 6, pp. 1375-1382. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on November 14, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168625.
TRANSPLANTATION Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison1 Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2 University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; 3 Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4 University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 5 Vrije Universiteit (VU) Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6 Isala Clinics-Sophia, Zwolle, The Netherlands; 7 Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; 8 Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands; 9 Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; 10 Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands; 11 Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands; 12 Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 13 Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium; 14 University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and 15 Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology (HOVON) While commonly accepted in poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in first complete remission (CR1), according to a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Eligible patients (433) were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies, of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an allo-SCT. Allo-SCT was performed in 91 of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24 and 55% for patients with a donor versus those without a donor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 0.23-0.60; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality estimated 16% (± 4) at 5 years after allo-SCT. As a result, disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60 versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = .01). After risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (P = .05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favorable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest nonrelapse mortality. This trial is registered with http://www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||