| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 15 July 2006, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 473-479. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on March 21, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4828.
Submitted December 6, 2005
Department of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland * Corresponding author; email: robaktad{at}csk.umed.lodz.pl.
In this prospective randomized trial we compared the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) alone to 2-CdA combined with cyclophosphamide (CC) or cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone (CMC) in untreated progressive CLL. Study end points were complete response (CR), overall response, minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free survival, overall survival and toxicity. From January 1st 1998 to December 31st 2003, 508 patients from 15 hematology departments were randomized. Compared to 2-CdA, CMC induced higher CR rate (36% vs. 21%, p=0.004), whilst only trend for higher CR rate with CC was observed (29% vs. 21%, p=0.08). Furthermore, percentage of patients in CR and MRD negative were higher in CMC compared to 2-CdA (23% vs 14% p=0.042). There were no differences in overall response, progression-free survival and overall survival among treatment groups. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred more frequently in CC (32%) and CMC (38%) than in 2-CdA (20%) (p=0.01 and p=0.004, respectively). Infections were more frequent in CMC compared to 2-CdA (40% vs. 27%, p=0.02). In conclusion, CMC used in first-line treatment of CLL gives higher CR rate and suppresses MRD more efficiently than 2-CdA monotherapy, although associates with increased toxicity. No important differences in efficacy and toxicity were found between CC and 2-CdA regimens.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||