Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Synergistic reversal of multidrug-resistance phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia cells by cyclosporin A and cremophor EL

DD Ross, PJ Wooten, Y Tong, B Cornblatt, C Levy, R Sridhara, EJ Lee and CA Schiffer

University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore 21201.

Cremophor (Crem) EL, the vehicle for intravenous delivery of cyclosporin A (CsA), has been reported to counteract multidrug resistance (MDR) in P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-over-expressing cell lines. Because of this, we sought to determine whether Crem functions independently as a modulator of MDR in blast cells obtained from acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients, and the nature of its interaction in combination with CsA in reversing an MDR phenotype. In the phenotypically classical MDR AML cell lines HL-60/Vinc (overexpresses Pgp) or HL-60/AR (does not overexpress Pgp), the dose causing half- maximum enhancement (D50) of daunorubicin (DNR, 1 micrograms/mL, 3 hours) accumulation was achieved by the combination of CsA and Crem (CsA/Crem) at 1.2 mumol/L CsA. In contrast, the D50 for Crem alone was approached at an amount that would be needed to suspend 6.2 mumol/L CsA for HL-60/Vinc, and 81 mumol/L CsA for HL-60/AR. The D50 concentrations for CsA alone (dissolved in ethanol, which does not alter DNR accumulation) were also higher than those for CsA/Crem, being 6.5 mumol/L for HL-60/Vinc, and 3.1 mumol/L for HL-60/AR. The maximum absolute level of enhancement of DNR accumulation (Emax) in each cell line was approximately equivalent for CsA/Crem or CsA alone, and was equal to the 3 hr intracellular DNR accumulation observed in parental, drug sensitive HL-60/W cells. For Crem alone, HL-60/AR and HL-60/Vinc cells showed markedly different responses: HL-60/Vinc cells attained intracellular DNR content comparable to HL-60/W, whereas HL-60/AR cells achieved only approximately 35% of this level. Multiple-drug effects were analyzed by calculation of the Combination Index (Chou and Talalay, Adv Enzyme Regul 22:27, 1984), which indicated that CsA and Crem are synergistic in causing enhancement of DNR accumulation in these MDR HL-60 cell lines. In blasts from AML patients, 5 mumol/L CsA/Crem or an equivalent amount of Crem alone each caused significant (P < .001) enhancement of DNR accumulation (60 AML-patient marrow samples) or DNR retention (51 AML-patient marrows). Similarly, CsA/Crem or Crem alone caused significant (P < .01) enhancement of the cytotoxicity of DNR in 36 AML blast cell specimens. The degree of enhancement of accumulation/retention or cytotoxicity by CsA/Crem was approximately equivalent to that obtained with Crem alone. These studies indicate that Crem can reverse an MDR phenotype in patient AML blast cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Volume 83, Issue 5, pp. 1337-1347, 03/01/1994
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Nakanishi, J. E. Karp, M. Tan, L. A. Doyle, T. Peters, W. Yang, D. Wei, and D. D. Ross
Quantitative Analysis of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein and Cellular Resistance to Flavopiridol in Acute Leukemia Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3320 - 3328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. F. List, K. J. Kopecky, C. L. Willman, D. R. Head, D. L. Persons, M. L. Slovak, R. Dorr, C. Karanes, H. E. Hynes, J. H. Doroshow, et al.
Benefit of cyclosporine modulation of drug resistance in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study
Blood, December 1, 2001; 98(12): 3212 - 3220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. J. Lee, S. L. George, M. Caligiuri, T. P. Szatrowski, B. L. Powell, S. Lemke, R. K. Dodge, R. Smith, M. Baer, and C. A. Schiffer
Parallel Phase I Studies of Daunorubicin Given With Cytarabine and Etoposide With or Without the Multidrug Resistance Modulator PSC-833 in Previously Untreated Patients 60 Years of Age or Older With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9420
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 1999; 17(9): 2831 - 2831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020