|
|
Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 6 (March 15), 1998:
pp. 1833-1844
REVIEW ARTICLE
Malignancies After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Many
Questions, Some Answers
By
H. Joachim Deeg and
Gérard Socié
From the Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and the Service
d'Hématologie-Greffe de Moelle and Unité de Recherche sur
la Biologie des Cellules Souches, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris,
France.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
ALTHOUGH MANY ASPECTS of the development
of malignant tumors are still incompletely understood, conditions have
been identified under which malignancies develop at a higher frequency
than in the population at large.1-3 These include, for
example, actinic exposure of the skin and the mutagenic effect of UV
light; genetic disorders such as Fanconi anemia, ataxia telangiectasia,
and immunodeficiency syndromes, which are associated with chromosome
fragility, defects of repair enzymes, or cellular immune defects; a
high incidence of malignancies has also been observed in patients
receiving immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation;
long-term studies in survivors of the atomic bomb explosions at
Hiroshima and Nagasaki have yielded a wealth of data on the effect of
various doses and qualities (gamma rays or neutrons) of radiation on
the development of malignancies, in particular of the blood-forming
organs.4 Similar observations have been made in patients
who received irradiation for medical indications, eg, acne, ankylosing
spondylitis, and other disorders.5-7 Secondary malignancies
are a well-recognized complication in patients with Hodgkin's disease
or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy or combined
modality treatment.8-10 Certain viruses, such as
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which is used in the laboratory to
immortalize cell lines, can transform cells in vivo, which then may
show uncontrolled growth and evolve into malignancies.11-14
Experiments in the 1960s and 1970s in murine models suggested,
furthermore, that a graft-versus-host reaction after allogeneic spleen
cell transplantation could transform from an immunologic to a
neoplastic disorder, ie, the development of lymphoma.15
Finally, marrow transplant studies in rhesus monkeys and dogs in the
1970s and 1980s showed a significant increase in the incidence of
malignancies relative to controls in radiation chimeras, ie, in animals
irradiated with lethal doses of total body irradiation (TBI) and
infused with autologous or allogeneic marrow cells (reviewed in Deeg et
al,16 Broerse et al,17 and Kolb et
al18). Thus, it should not be surprising that new
malignancies occur in patients after hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation, in which one or several of these risk factors are
present. The potential overlapping effects of various factors are shown
schematically in Fig 1. The major
categories of posttransplant malignancies are listed in Table 1.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
Overlap and interactions of factors that may contribute
to the development of new malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
|
|
 |
POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS (PTLD) AND LYMPHOMAS |
The majority of cases of PTLD after hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation have been observed in allogeneic (rather than autologous) recipients.19 Most of these PTLD are best
classified as B-cell PTLD rather than non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma.2,11,20-24 In addition, some T-cell PTLD have been
reported. Thirdly, lymphomas with clinical and biological
characteristics typical for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's
disease as seen in nontransplanted patients have occurred after stem
cell transplantation. Although lymphoproliferative disorders do not
represent a frequent posttransplant complication, important insights
have been gained into the pathophysiology and considerable progress has
been made in regards to treatment.
B-Cell PTLD
Incidence.
B-cell PTLD are clinically and morphologically heterogeneous; usually
they are associated with T-cell dysfunction and the presence of EBV.
B-cell PTLD have been observed with almost any organ
transplant.12,25-31 Cohen11 recently reviewed
100 well-documented cases, including 32 in marrow transplant
recipients. Additional cases have been described since then, bringing
the total number of PTLD after hematopoietic transplants to about 70 to
100.32-40 In Cohen's review,11 the mean
interval from transplantation to the development of B-cell PTLD was 5 months, with most being diagnosed within 3 months. It appears that
patients transplanted for congenital immunodeficiencies are at a
particularly high risk for PTLD, presumably due to the underlying
immunodeficiency and T-cell depletion of the donor graft generally used
for these diseases (see risk factors). Because the diagnostic criteria
may differ from study to study (eg, a nonlethal infectious
mononucleosis-like syndrome may resolve spontaneously, whereas
acute-onset extensive disease may be diagnosed only at autopsy), the
true incidence of B-cell PTLD after hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation is difficult to determine. In a large single-center
survey (1,400 allografted patients), the cumulative incidence of B-cell
PTLD reached a plateau of 1.6% by 4 years after transplantation; other published data range from 0.6% to 10%.41
Clinical features.
The most frequent presentation of PTLD is with fever and
lymphadenopathy. Intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, or hepatomegaly may cause symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, or
diarrhea. Extrahematopoietic organ involvement, including lungs, kidneys, and the central nervous system (CNS), is frequent. CNS involvement is of particular concern, because it has been associated with a dismal prognosis. The differential diagnosis in a symptomatic patient should include PTLD a priori in high-risk situations such as in
recipients of T-cell-depleted or HLA-nonidentical transplants. Early
diagnosis has become important since powerful therapeutic instruments
(see below) have been developed. Early diagnosis can be established and
the effect of therapy can now be monitored by semiquantitative
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the EBV DNA (see pathogenesis and
treatment).
Pathology.
B-cell PTLD occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation are almost always of donor origin and associated with
EBV-genomic DNA integration. Biopsies show monomorphic or polymorphic,
diffuse large-cell lymphoma of B-cell origin. However, whereas the
morphology of B-cell PTLD occurring after solid organ transplantation
has been described extensively, few studies have examined in detail the
histologic features of PTLD in hematopoietic stem cell
recipients.37-39,42,43 Those reports show that, whereas some of these PTLD are histopathologically similar to the polymorphic PTLD described in solid organ transplant recipients, as many as half of
the cases after stem cell transplantation show aggressive features of
immunoblastic lymphoma.23 Also, in contrast to PTLD after
organ transplantation, most B-cell PTLD occurring after stem cell
transplantation are oligoclonal or monoclonal, as determined by
analysis of Ig gene rearrangements and fused termini of episomal EBV
DNA,13,23,44-46 although some discrepancies between these two methods (tumors appearing monoclonal on the basis of EBV genomic analysis and polyclonal by analysis of Ig gene rearrangement) have been
observed.44,47,48 PTLD express the full array of latent EBV
antigens, including EBNA-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -6 and
LMP1.14,23,49-52 Karyotypic analyses have identified
nonconsistent cytogenetic abnormalities, more frequently in monoclonal
lesions of more aggressive histology. However, with the exception of
two cases of B-cell PTLD developing in heart transplant
recipients,53 the characteristic translocation of
Burkitt's lymphoma has not been observed in lymphoproliferative
disorders developing after marrow (or solid organ) transplantation.
In a recent report of 10 cases of PTLD in marrow transplant recipients,
Orazi et al43 attempted to correlate morphology with
clonality (based on Ig chain gene rearrangement and immunochemistry), proliferative activity as measured by immunostaining for the
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and presence of p53
overexpression. The cases included seven polymorphic B-cell lymphomas
and three immunoblastic lymphomas. Ig heavy chain gene rearrangement
analysis showed B-cell clonality in three of seven polymorphic
lymphomas and in all three immunoblastic lymphomas. The EBV genome, the expression of the EBV latent membrane protein, or both were found in
all 10 cases. High proliferative activity as assessed by the expression
of the PCNA antigen was found in all cases, and five specimens were
p53+.
Risk factors.
B-cell PTLD were the first posttransplant malignancies for which risk
factors were identified.21,38,39,54 In 1989, Witherspoon et
al54 showed in multivariate analysis that treatment of
acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with either antithymocyte
globulin or monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody, total body irradiation,
T-cell depletion of donor marrow, and HLA nonidentity between donor and recipient were risk factors for PTLD. A more recent survey by Bhatia et
al41 showed the following factors to be associated with an
increased risk of B-cell PTLD: T-cell depletion of the graft (relative
risk [RR] = 11.9), HLA mismatch (RR = 8.9), use of antithymocyte
globulin for acute GVHD prophylaxis (RR = 5.9) or in the preparative
regimen (RR = 3.1), and primary immune deficiency disease (RR = 2.5).
The cumulative risk of developing a B-cell PTLD in patients with
primary immune deficiency who received a T-cell-depleted
HLA-mismatched transplant was 64.8% ± 17.7% at 4 years, compared
with 0.9% ± 0.2% (P < .001) in patients who received an
HLA-matched transplant with no in vitro manipulation of the graft. The
role of HLA-mismatching in the pathogenesis of B-cell PTLD is not clear
but may consist in chronic antigenic stimulation or delayed immune
reconstitution. In unrelated transplants, the National Marrow Donor
Program (NMDP) reported an incidence of PTLD of 2% overall, 5% in
patients receiving a T-cell depleted marrow, and 1% for those
receiving a T-replete graft.55 However, available data
suggest that the risk is not uniform but depends on the method of
T-cell depletion and the type of additional immunosuppression used in
the posttransplantation period. Although in patients transplanted with
marrow depleted of T cells with specific monoclonal antibodies the
incidence of EBV-positive PTLD ranged from 11% to 25%, the incidence
was less than 1% with techniques removing both T and B lymphocytes
(eg, soybean agglutinin or Campath-1), possibly reflecting the 2 to 3 log reduction in B lymphocytes associated with these
procedures.23,56 However, when additional posttransplant immunosuppression with steroids and antithymocyte globulin was administered after HLA-matched or mismatched related transplants or
transplants from unrelated donors using soybean
agglutination/E-rosetting for T-cell depletion, the incidence of PTLD
increased to 6% to 18%.23 Finally, even in the absence of
in vitro T-cell depletion, the use of intensive in vivo
immunosuppressive prophylaxis or therapy of GVHD, especially with
anti-T-cell agents such as OKT3 antibody or antithymocyte globulin, is
associated with the development of B-cell PTLD.3,57
Pathogenesis.
B-cell PTLD are thought to develop because of depressed EBV-specific
cellular immunity and the inherent transforming capacities of EBV. EBV
is a ubiquitous herpes virus that infects 95% of individuals by
adulthood. The virus persists as a latent infection in certain epithelial cells, where reactivation and replication may occur intermittently, and in B lymphocytes.58 EBV type A and type B have been defined on the basis of sequence divergence in the EBNA-2
gene. In a recent series of 27 solid organ transplant recipients who
developed PTLD, type A EBV was present in 24 of 27 cases (89%) by PCR
amplification of EBNA-2 and EBNA-3c regions. In addition, there was
polymorphism at the EBER locus documenting the presence of four
different type A EBV strains. None of the 27 cases harbored type B
EBV.59 Whether the same applies to marrow transplant recipients remains to be determined.
Among the 80 to 100 EBV-encoded proteins, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP-1) plays an essential role in B-cell immortalization. LMP-1 has
recently been shown to induce the expression of bcl-2, which inhibits
programmed death of the infected cells. LMP-1 is also considered an
oncogene because of its ability to transform rodent fibroblasts.
Deletions near the 3 end of the LMP-1 gene, in a region that
affects the half-life of the LMP-1 protein, have been reported in some
EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders60,61; B-cell PTLD
after marrow or stem cell transplantation have not been analyzed yet.
Infection of B cells by EBV also induces high levels of interleukin-1
(IL-1), IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, CD23, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). The
cellular IL-10 and the EBV-induced BCRF1, a homolog of IL-10, act as
autocrine growth factors, stimulating the proliferation of
EBV-transformed B cells and inhibiting their susceptibility to
apoptosis. Much of the initial work investigating anti-EBV cellular
responses was performed in patients with acute infectious mononucleosis
(reviewed in O'Reilly et al23). Early in the course of the
disease, natural killer cells and cytotoxic and suppressor
T cells reactive against EBV emerge. Using standard assays of
cell-mediated cytolysis, Crawford et al62 found that, in
recipients of unmodified marrow, 7 of 10 patients studied had defective
killing of autologous targets at 3 months posttransplant, but all were
normal by 6 months.
In a recent study, investigators at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center explored whether deficiencies of EBV-specific cellular immunity
contribute to EBV-PTLD susceptibility.63,64 They performed limiting dilution analysis to quantify anti-EBV specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) frequencies in 26 recipients of unmodified or T-cell-depleted grafts from EBV-seropositive donors. At
3 months, only 5 of the 26 patients had EBV CTLp frequencies in the
normal range of seropositive controls, whereas at 6 months, 9 of 13 patients were within the normal range. This time interval of low CTLp
frequency corresponds to the period in which B-cell PTLD are observed.
The same investigators showed that EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes
home preferentially to and induce selective regression of autologous
EBV-induced B-cell lymphoproliferative lesions in xenografted SCID
mice.65 These studies have led to clinical trials (see
below) on the role of EBV-specific T lymphocytes in controlling
EBV-induced B-cell proliferation. Rather definitive proof has been
provided by the St Jude group using adoptive transfer of gene-modified
EBV-specific T lymphocytes.66 Preliminary clinical results67 showed that adoptive transfer of EBV-specific
cytotoxic T lymphocytes offered effective therapy for B-cell PTLD. The
investigators showed long-term persistence of gene-marked EBV-specific
cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo. These cells not only restored cellular immunity against EBV, but also provided a population of CTLps that
responded to in vivo or ex vivo challenge with the virus for as long as
18 months.
Prophylaxis and treatment.
Because various recognized risk factors such as initial diagnosis
(primary immune deficiency syndrome) or type of donor
(HLA-nonidentical) cannot be changed and others (eg, GVHD prophylaxis)
are considered an integral part of the overall treatment regimen, it
has been proposed to use early identification of EBV-associated PTLD as an indication for therapy rather than apply true prophylaxis. The St
Jude group used both the outgrowth of transformed B lymphocytes ex vivo
and detection of EBV DNA by a PCR method as tools to detect EBV-associated lymphoproliferation before clinical disease
developed.68 A semiquantitative PCR assay is used to assist
in the detection of EBV DNA in peripheral blood and in monitoring the
effect of therapy.67,69-71
Complete regression of B-cell PTLD has been reported in 40% of
patients after reduction or discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, particularly in renal transplant recipients.72
Immunosuppression is intrinsic to marrow transplantation, and
discontinuation of immunosuppression is likely to result in flares of
GVHD and a further delay in recovery of T-cell-mediated immunity.
EBV-transformed B cells contain a circular viral DNA that is not
susceptible to inhibition by thymidine kinase (TK) inhibitors.
Nevertheless, anecdotal reports suggest tumor regression with either
acyclovir and ganciclovir therapy (reviewed in Benkerrou et
al72 and Sullivan et al73). Chemotherapy and
irradiation have been useful in selected cases, and in a recent series
of cardiac transplant recipients, among 19 consecutive patients with
PTLD, 6 of 8 treated with aggressive chemotherapy are surviving in
complete remission, at a median follow-up of 38 months.74
Surgical resection has proven effective when the PTLD was limited to
single sites in solid organ transplant recipients.11
More recently, three approaches have shown promise in the treatment of
B-cell PTLD in marrow transplant recipients: interferon, B-cell-specific monoclonal antibodies, and cellular therapy. A combination of interferon and intravenous Ig was first reported in
1988 by the Minneapolis group to be effective in B-cell PTLD. Remissions were maintained in several patients.75 In a
recent update, three of seven patients receiving interferon
achieved a complete remission (Gross and Filipovich, personal
communication, July 1997).
Two anti-B-cell antibodies (anti-CD21 and anti-CD24) were used by
Alain Fischer's group and by one of the authors (G.S.) in a
multicenter trial.36,76,77 Among 19 marrow transplant
recipients, 10 had a complete remission and 6 survived at a median
follow-up of 20 months.72 The survivors in this series all
were patients with oligoclonal disease. Studies in a SCID mouse
model78 show that, after initial remission, with such an
approach 30% to 50% of mice relapsed within 30 to 70 days, providing
a very strong indication that persistence of residual B cells can
provoke a second tumor in the absence of efficient cytotoxic T cells.
Currently, the anti-CD21 and CD24 antibodies used in these studies are
not available for clinical use (Alain Fischer, personal communication, July 1997). Based on in vitro data showing an antitumor effect of anti-IL-6 antibody in neutralizing the IL-6-dependent
proliferative loop,79,80 the same investigators are now
testing this antibody in patients with PTLD (Alain Fischer, personal
communication, July 1997).
In 1994, Papadopoulos et al47 first reported therapeutic
efficacy of the infusion of donor leukocytes in five patients who developed a B-cell PTLD after T-cell-depleted allogeneic marrow transplantation. Unirradiated donor leukocytes were infused at doses
calculated to provide 1.0 × 106 CD3+ T
cells/kg of body weight. All five patients had complete pathologic or
clinical responses. Three of the five patients developed chronic GVHD
and two died of respiratory failure with no evidence of PTLD at
autopsy. Subsequently, Rooney et al67 reported on the use of gene-marked EBV-specific T lymphocytes to control or prevent B-cell
PTLD in 10 patients. Three of the patients had shown signs of EBV
reactivation, with or without overt lymphoproliferation, and 7 received
T-cell infusions as prophylaxis. In the 3 patients with EBV
reactivation, EBV DNA levels that had increased 1,000-fold or more
returned to control levels within 3 to 4 weeks of immunotherapy. In a
recent update, the Sloan-Kettering team reported data on 15 patients
with eradication of B-cell PTLD in 14; GVHD occurred in 6 among the 12 evaluable patients.81 The St Jude team described the
prophylactic use of EBV-specific T-cell clones in 25 high-risk patients, none of which developed PTLD. Among 6 patients who either refused CTL therapy or were ineligible for treatment, 2 developed lymphomas that were successfully treated with CTL.82
Bordignon's group most recently reported on the use of HSV-TK gene
transfer in donor lymphocytes infused to control B-cell PTLD in two
patients. One of these patients subsequently developed GVHD that was
successfully treated with ganciclovir by way of activating the HSV-TK
suicide gene.83
Thus, promising approaches have been developed for the treatment of
B-cell PTLD in high-risk marrow84 and solid organ
transplant recipients.33 However, the numbers of patients
treated are still limited. Also, the use of cellular therapy may induce
GVHD if non-EBV-specific CTL are used and still requires high-level
biotechnology laboratories to provide either EBV-specific CTL clones or
HSV-TK-transduced T lymphocytes.
T-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Besides the well-defined B-cell PTLD, an entity of T-cell proliferative
disorders without EBV association has been reported both after solid
organ and marrow transplantation. After solid organ transplantation
these disorders have occurred predominantly at extranodal sites and
were monoclonal.85,86 After marrow transplantation, only
three such cases have been reported87; two occurred late
after transplant and may be included in the late-onset lymphoma
category (see below). None of the cases was associated with human
T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV1), human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV), or human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) infection.
Late-Onset Lymphoma
Some 20 cases of late occurring lymphomas have been reported in the
literature.21,88-94 At least two have been linked to EBV infection (just as early onset PTLD) and three were associated with
T-cell depletion of the graft. These cases presented like ordinary
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with lymph node enlargement with or without
generalized symptoms; one of these patients has been reported to be
disease-free after chemotherapy. At least two of the late lymphomas
were Hodgkin's disease. At Hôpital Saint Louis in Paris, such a
late occurrence of EBV-related Hodgkin's disease in donor cells was
observed in a patient transplanted 8 years before for chronic
myelogenous leukemia.89 Although more work is needed,
ongoing studies seem to support the notion that these late-occurring
lymphomas represent an entity distinct from the early occurring B-cell
PTLD (R. Curtis, personal communication, November 1997).
 |
MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS) AND ACUTE LEUKEMIA |
MDS and Acute Leukemia After Allogeneic Transplantation
In the early 1970s, Fialkow et al95 and Thomas et
al96 reported on two patients with acute lymphoblastic
leukemia receiving TBI and transplanted with marrow from an
HLA-identical sibling donor, who within 2 to 4 months experienced what
appeared to be a relapse of their original disease. However, further
studies using cytogenetic analysis showed that the leukemic cells were donor-derived. Both donors continued to be healthy. Several similar cases, including patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and chronic myeloid leukemia
(CML), were subsequently reported from other institutions
(reviewed in Deeg et al97). Conditioning regimens in those
patients consisted of chemotherapy only or chemotherapy plus TBI, and
the diagnosis of recurrent leukemia in donor cells was made 6 months to
more than 3 years after transplantation. Boyd et al98
estimated that as many as 3% to 5% of leukemia recurrences may in
fact be new leukemias in donor cells. However, no molecular tools were
used in that study.
The mechanism that would lead to leukemia in previously healthy
transplanted cells was not clear. Several hypotheses have been
proposed. Donor cells may have been transformed by antigenic stimulation through host tissue,95,99,100 as observed in
murine models of marrow transplantation.101 However, if
this was the case, one would expect a higher frequency of this event.
Alternatively, the recipient lymphohematopoietic environment in which
the original leukemia had developed might trigger a similar development
in donor cells.95 Furthermore, fusion of normal cells with
leukemic cells still residing in the recipient or transfection of an
etiologic agent (virus/oncogene) might have transformed donor
cells.102-104 Although these possibilities are conjectural,
the clinical observations are of interest in the context of
leukemogenesis in general.
More recent studies have used refined molecular biology tools (eg,
variable number tandem repeat [VNTR] analysis) to determine the
origin (host v donor) of normal or abnormal cells in patients posttransplant. As determined by microsatellite analysis, disease reappearance in donor-derived cells is infrequent.105 A
rare case of transplantation of leukemia from the donor into the
patient has been reported.106
MDS, of some concern in autologous transplant recipients (see below),
has occurred extremely infrequently after allogeneic transplantation
(even in patients with Fanconi anemia in whom MDS develops frequently
if not transplanted with normal cells). This observation provides
indirect support for the notion that MDS after autologous
transplantation is related to pretransplant factors rather than the
transplant itself.
MDS and AML After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are
used with increasing frequency in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, breast cancer, and other indications. Recent randomized trials have shown that this approach is more effective than conventional chemotherapy in patients with
chemotherapy-sensitive relapse107 and in some patients with
high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.108,109 Secondary MDS and
AML have been observed after conventional chemotherapy and to a lesser
extent radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma.8,110-113 Alkylating agents, epipodophylotoxins,
combined modality therapy, and splenectomy have been implicated as risk
factors.110 Clearly, therefore, this complication does
occur in patients who have not been transplanted, and a thorough
evaluation of all transplant candidates, particularly in regard to
cytogenetic abnormalties, before autologous transplantation is
mandatory.114
Nevertheless, beginning in 1993, several studies reported the
development of secondary MDS and AML in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who had undergone autologous transplantation at a frequency that appeared unusually high (reviewed in Socié,88 Blume,115
Kumar,116 Taylor et al,117
Rohatiner,118 and Stone119). Marolleau et
al120 first reported three cases of AML among 168 patients
treated with autologous transplants for advanced lymphomas (median
follow-up, 3 years). In 1994, the University of Nebraska
team121 reported its experience in a case-control study.
Twelve cases of MDS/AML occurred in 511 patients after autologous
transplants for Hodgkin's disease (n = 249) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
(n = 262). The cumulative incidence at 5 years was estimated to be 4%
(11% and 12% for the two groups, respectively, among patients alive
at 5 years). Age greater than 40 years at the time of transplant and
the use of TBI were risk factors. Among 262 patients receiving
autologous transplants for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma at the Dana Farber
Cancer Center, 12 developed MDS/AML for a 6-year cumulative incidence
of 18% ± 9%.122 Pretreatment variables predictive (in
univariate analysis) for the development of MDS included prolonged interval between initial treatment and transplantation, duration of
exposure to chemotherapy (alkylating agents), and use of radiotherapy, especially pelvic irradiation. The Minneapolis team123
reported on 206 patients with either Hodgkin's disease (n = 68) or
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 138) who showed a 5-year cumulative
incidence of MDS of 14.5% ± 11.6%. Recipients of peripheral blood
transplants had an apparent higher risk than marrow transplant
recipients (31% ± 33% v 10.5% ± 12%, respectively;
P = .0035). In these three series combined, the elapsed time
between transplant and diagnosis of MDS/AML ranged from 30 to 103 months. In a study at City of Hope Medical Center, clonal chromosomal
abnormalities were detected in 10 of 275 patients after autologous
transplant for Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma.124,125 The diagnosis was made 1.8 to 6.5 years
after chemotherapy and 0.5 to 3.1 years after transplantation,
respectively. In nine patients the abnormalities involved chromosome 5, 7, 11q23, 21q22, or combinations thereof. Five patients had morphologic
evidence of MDS or AML. The cumulative probability of developing clonal
chromosomal abnormalities reached 9% ± 4.7% at 3 years after
transplantation.
The Minneapolis team recently updated their results.41
Among 258 patients receiving autologous transplants for Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 10 developed MDS/AML, for a cumulative probability of 13.5% ± 4.8% at 6 years. In
multivariate analysis, the use of peripheral blood stem cells (RR = 5.8) and age over 35 years at transplant (RR = 3.5) were associated
with an increased risk of MDS/AML. A French study of 467 patients also observed a higher incidence of MDS after peripheral blood than after
marrow stem cell transplantation.126
MDS/AML have also been reported after transplantation for breast
cancer.127 Although studies are less extensive than in
patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, there is
evidence that in particular after accelerated dose adjuvant therapy,
the incidence of MDS may be high.
These observations are of interest and raise several questions. Is
MDS/AML after transplantation related to pretransplant chemoradiotherapy administered as primary or salvage therapy? Among 188 patients who underwent transplant for multiple myeloma at the
University of Arkansas,128 71 were enrolled in a total therapy program and received no more than one course of standard chemotherapy (median, 7.6 months of treatment), whereas 117 patients had received more prolonged treatment courses before transplantation (median, 24 months). Seven patients developed MDS, all in the group of
patients who had received prolonged treatment, leading the
investigators to conclude that pretransplant therapy was the major risk
factor for MDS after autologous transplantation. A closely related
question is whether MDS/AML arises from the infused marrow (or
peripheral blood) stem cells or from residual cells in the patient. If
the disease develops from reinfused stem cells, then it is unlikely
that TBI administered in preparation for transplant is a risk
factor unless we postulate that TBI modifies the microenvironment in a
way that enhances the risk of leukemogenesis. However, if the
development of MDS/AML is related to the transplant procedure, we need
to ask the following questions. Is it the procedure itself or, eg, the
status of immunoincompetence following the transplant that contributes
to the development of MDS? Do peripheral blood stem cells modify the
milieu in a way different from marrow? Investigations into the function
of growth factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cells show indeed
cellular function (T cells and monocytes) and cytokine patterns
different from marrow.129 In fact, the term disordered
engraftment has been proposed to describe the hematopoiesis in these
patients.119
 |
SOLID TUMORS |
Observations in animal models suggested that posttransplant (or
postirradiation) solid tumors occurred with considerable delay, ranging
from 7.5 to 15 years (median, 11.5 years) in x-irradiated and 4 to 15 years (median, 8 years) in rhesus monkeys irradiated with fission
neutrons.17 The time interval in -irradiated dogs was
1.6 to 10.5 years (median, 8 years).16 Extrapolation to humans with a longer expected life span would suggest that solid tumors
might develop a decade or more after transplantation. This appears to
be born out by the actual data.1-3
Solid Tumors After Allogeneic Transplants
Initial reports, generally on small numbers of patients who had
undergone allogeneic (or syngeneic) marrow transplantation, documented
the development of some adenocarcinomas of the rectum, brain tumors
(glioblastomas) particularly in patients who had also received cranial
irradiation (1,800 to 2,400 cGy) before transplantation, squamous cell
carcinomas of the skin, and cancers of the oropharyngeal
mucosa.97,130 In contrast to PTLD, which generally were
diagnosed within 2 to 4 months of transplantation, these solid tumors
were observed at 1 to 5 years.1-3
In the first larger series, analyzing results in 2,145 patients
transplanted from 1970 through 1987 in Seattle, Witherspoon et
al54 found 35 new malignancies; 13 of these were solid
tumors, including glioblastoma, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma,
adenocarcinoma, hepatoma, and basal cell carcinoma. These tumors were
diagnosed between 2.5 months and 14 years (median, 4.6 years) after
transplantation. Although TBI was a significant risk factor when all
malignancies were considered, only the use of antithymocyte globulin as
an immunosuppressive agent was identified as a significant risk factor for solid tumors. Subsequent analysis of the results in patients with
aplastic anemia transplanted in Seattle and at Hôpital Saint Louis in Paris, as well as reports from other European centers, showed
that irradiation, in particular total lymphoid or thoraco-abdominal irradiation (as compared with conditioning regimens that did not involve irradiation), was a significant risk factor for the development of solid tumors.131 A combined analysis of results in 700 patients with aplastic anemia transplanted at the Fred Hutchinson
Cancer Research Center or Hôpital Saint Louis suggested that, in
addition to irradiation (RR [RR] = 3.9), treatment of chronic GVHD
with azathioprine (RR = 7.5) and older age (RR = 1.1) increased the risk of a posttransplant malignancy.131 Not surprisingly,
the highest incidence of malignancy was observed in patients in whom the etiology of marrow failure was Fanconi anemia (Kaplan-Meier estimate at 15 years, ~40%). However, it is of note that no
hematologic malignancies (MDS, etc) were observed in either idiopathic
or Fanconi-associated aplastic anemia, an indication that the
transplanted (allogeneic) stem cells were able to develop and
differentiate normally in the patient's marrow microenvironment.
Bhatia et al41 summarized observations in patients
transplanted in Minneapolis. Among 2,150 patients, 15 developed a solid tumor (8 in 1,400 allogeneic and 7 in 750 autologous transplant recipients)41 for a cumulative probability of 5.6% at 13 years. Irradiation was the major risk factor (RR = 6; P = .008). Kolb et al132 determined the incidence of
posttransplant malignancies in 1,211 patients who had survived at least
5 years after transplantation at 45 European centers. Forty-seven
patients developed malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma,
breast cancer, glioblastoma, lymphoma, and others. In comparison to
normal controls, the incidence rates were increased significantly for
malignancies of the oral cavity, skin, esophagus, uterine cervix, and
brain. In univariate analysis, donor age, chronic GVHD, and treatment
of GVHD with cyclosporine, thalidomide, azathioprine, or methotrexate,
and the number of agents used were found to be significant. In
multivariate analysis using a Cox model, donor age above 30 years and
chronic GVHD were significant risk factors, but the use of irradiation for conditioning was not.
In a large collaborative study, Curtis et al133 analyzed
results in 19,220 patients (97.2% allogeneic and 2.8% syngeneic recipients) transplanted between 1964 and 1992 at 235 centers. There
were 80 solid tumors for an observed/expected (O/E) ratio of 2.7 (P < .001). In patients surviving at least 10 years after transplantation, the risk was increased eightfold. The cumulative incidence of tumors was 2.2% at 10 years and 6.7% at 15 years. The
risk was increased significantly for melanoma (O/E = 5.0), cancers of
the oral cavity (11.1), liver (7.5), CNS (7.6), thyroid (6.6), bone
(13.4), and connective tissue (8.0). The risk was highest for the
youngest patients and declined with age (P for trend, <.001).
Other risk factors are summarized in Table
2. Most striking was the link of squamous cell carcinoma with chronic GVHD and male gender. The underlying diagnosis was important insofar as
the risk of solid tumors was higher for patients with acute leukemia
and lower in patients with lymphoma or aplastic anemia. The risk
associated with TBI decreased if irradiation was administered with a
fractionation regimen, but increased with the total cumulative dose
administered. This analysis strongly suggests that reduced doses of
TBI, the omission of limited field irradiation, and the prevention of
GVHD, in particular chronic GVHD, should reduce the risk of
posttransplant solid tumors.
Solid Tumors After Autologous Transplants
Although studies to date have focused on allogeneic transplant
recipients, there is evidence for an increased incidence of new
malignancies in autologous patients as well. A French study analyzed
results in patients with Hodgkin's disease, 467 of whom had received
an autologous stem cell transplant and 3,855 had been treated with
conventional therapy.126 Among the transplanted patients,
18 developed a new malignancy for an the incidence of 8.9% at 5 years.
The incidence was particularly high in patients above the age of 35 years and in patients who had received peripheral blood (rather than
marrow) stem cells. Whereas the incidences of MDS were similar in
transplanted and nontransplanted patients, transplanted patients were
at a higher risk of solid tumors (P = .039). As noted before, a
recent analysis of results in patients transplanted in Minneapolis also
showed seven solid tumors in 750 autologous transplant recipients.
Unpublished Seattle data show 6 solid tumors among 684 autologous
transplant recipients conditioned with a radiation-containing or
chemotherapy-only regimen (R.P. Witherspoon, personal communication,
November 1997). Further observations in autologous
transplant recipients will be of great interest because etiologic
factors, such as chronic alloantigenic stimulation and GVHD, can
basically be excluded.
Pathogenesis of Solid Posttransplant Tumors
Much less is known about the pathogenesis of solid tumors than of
PTLDs. However, the interaction of various factors, as shown in Fig 1,
appears to apply to these malignancies as well. Using a PCR technique,
Socié et al (unpublished observations) found evidence for involvement of human papilloma virus (HPV) 13, 15, or 16 in three of eight tumors examined; HHV8 was detected in one tumor. In
addition, the pattern of p53 expression suggested mutations of this
gene in all eight tumors studied. Mutations might be induced by
cytotoxic therapy, and suppressed immunity would interfere with a
normal surveillance. Clearly, considerable work is needed for a better
understanding of those questions.
Therapy
Therapy of solid tumors after transplantation has followed the
standards used in nontransplant patients. Experimental studies suggest
that selective immunostimulation and measures aimed at scavenging free
radicals may be beneficial in preventing tumor development.
 |
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN EVALUATING THE RISK OF NEW MALIGNANCIES
AFTER STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION |
The development of new malignancies has long been recognized as a
potential complication of cytotoxic therapy, either with chemotherapeutic agents or irradiation. An increased incidence has been
observed, eg, in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease, acute
leukemia, or solid tumors in childhood. Intensive cytotoxic conditioning therapy is also used in preparation for stem cell transplantation to eradicate the underlying disease. Furthermore, in
allogeneic transplants, the conditioning regimen provides
immunosuppression, thereby assuring sustained engraftment of
donor-derived cells. As a result, transplantation is followed by a
period of severe immunodeficiency that is further enhanced, in
allogeneic transplants, by immunosuppressive agents administered for
prophylaxis or therapy of GVHD. These and other factors (including the
primary disease and treatment administered pretransplant) contribute to
the development of second malignancies after stem cell transplantation.
The data reviewed here raise questions about the best approach to
estimate risks and to provide information for physicians and patients
about the excess risk of second malignancy after stem cell
transplantation. The most commonly used method is the standardized
incidence ratio (SIR), ie, the ratio of observed (O) incidence of
malignancies in the patient cohort compared with the expected (E)
incidence of these malignancies in the general population of the same
age and gender. High SIR, or RRs, in cohorts of young patients must be
viewed within the context of the frequency of events in the comparable
general population at similar ages. For example, few cases of a new
acute leukemia in a cohort lead to a high SIR because of the rarity of
this disease in the general population, whereas a substantial number of
second breast cancers is needed before the O/E ratio becomes
significant because of the relative frequency of this tumor type within
the general population.
Another commonly used method is actuarial risk estimates (using
Kaplan-Meier method, eg). These actuarial estimates often lead to
alarming figures once the interval after treatment exceeds 5 to 10 years, due to the fact that data for most of the study population are
censored at follow-up intervals shorter than those at which second
malignancies are recognized. As a result, this method magnifies the
percentage of change caused by any event. This problem should be kept
in mind when comparing actuarial estimates provided by two different
studies (ie, 5% and 15% actuarial incidences of second malignancies
at 10 years might not be different, due to large confidence interval
limits). These methodologic aspects have been reviewed in a recent
editorial on second cancers after Hodgkin's disease in childhood
treated with conventional chemoradiotherapy.134
Finally, in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, one
has to ask whether the general population is the best reference group.
Because other conventional (standard chemotherapy) treatment is
administered for some (if not all) diseases that are also treated with
transplantation, it would be important to compare the risk of second
malignancy (and survival!) in patients receiving transplants versus
conventional therapy rather than transplanted patients versus the
healthy population.
 |
CONCLUSIONS |
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers curative therapy for
many patients with otherwise incurable disease. Currently about 20,000 transplants are performed annually and most patients who do not
experience a recurrence of their underlying disease within 1 or 2 years
of transplantation do well and lead productive lives. However, some
complications do occur, one of them being the development of a new
malignancy. The incidence of posttransplant malignancies appears to be
low overall, although some high-risk situations have been recognized,
including an underlying diagnosis of immunodeficiency or other genetic
defects, high-dose irradiation for conditioning, T-cell depletion of
the marrow, HLA nonidentity of the donor, and chronic GVHD. Although we
have begun to develop a good understanding of the mechanism involved in
and the frequency of PTLD, information on hematopoietic disorders and
solid tumors is much more rudimentary. The time course of development
of the various malignancies varies (Fig 2),
and longer observation is required before the full extent of the risk
of solid tumors can be assessed. Thus, many questions remain.
Nevertheless, available data provide a basis on which to develop
approaches that may be associated with lower risks.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Scheme of time course and RR of the major categories of
posttransplant malignancies. Whereas lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) occur almost exclusively in allogeneic transplant recipients, solid tumors are observed in both allogeneic and autologous patients. MDS and leukemia have been reported more frequently after autologous transplantation. (Note logarithmic scale of time axis.)
|
|
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted August 28, 1997;
accepted October 15, 1997.
Supported by Public Health Services Grants No. CA18029, CA18221,
CA15704, and HL36444 and by Contract No. NCI N01-CP-51027.
Address reprint requests to H. Joachim Deeg, MD, Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of
Washington, 1124 Columbia St, M318, Seattle, WA 98104.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors thank H.J. Kolb, R.P. Witherspoon, and R. Curtis for their
continuing contributions; R. Storb and E. Gluckman for support; A. Fischer and A. Fillipovich for communication of yet unpublished
results; B. Larson and H. Childs for typing the manuscript; and E.D.
Thomas for providing critical comments.
 |
REFERENCES |
1. Deeg HJ: Delayed complications after bone marrow transplantation,
in Forman SJ, Blume KG, Thomas ED (eds): Bone Marrow Transplantation.
Boston, MA, Blackwell Scientific, 1994, p 538
2.
Socie G,
Kolb HJ:
Malignant diseases after bone marrow transplantation: The case for tumor banking and continued reporting to registries. EBMT Late-Effects Working Party (editorial).
Bone Marrow Transplant
16:493,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Deeg HJ,
Witherspoon RP:
Risk factors for the development of secondary malignancies after marrow transplantation.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am
7:417,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4. The Committee for the Compilation of Materials on Damage Caused
by the Atomic Bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Hiroshima and Nagasaki:
The Physical, Medical, and Social Effects of the Atomic Bombings. New
York, NY, Basic Books, 1981
5.
Mole RH:
Late effects of radiation: Carcinogenesis (review).
Br Med Bull
29:78,
1973[Free Full Text]
6.
Boice JD:
Cancer following medical irradiation.
Cancer
47:1081,
1981[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Tucker MA,
D'Angio GJ,
Boice JD Jr,
Strong LC,
Li FP,
Stovall M,
Stone BJ,
Green DM,
Lombardi F,
Newton W,
Hoover RN,
Fraumeni JF Jr:
Bone sarcomas linked to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in children.
N Engl J Med
317:588,
1987[Abstract]
8.
Travis LB,
Curtis RE,
Stovall M,
Holowaty EJ,
Van Leeuwen FE,
Glimelius B,
Lynch CF,
Hagenbeek A,
Li CY,
Banks PM,
Gospodarowicz MK,
Adami J,
Wacholder S,
Inskip PD,
Tucker M,
Boice JD:
Risk of leukemia following treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
J Natl Cancer Inst
86:1450,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Mauch PM,
Kalish LA,
Marcus KC,
Coleman CN,
Shulman LN,
Krill E,
Come S,
Silver B,
Canellos GP,
Tarbell NJ:
Second malignancies after treatment for laparotomy staged IA-IIIB Hodgkin's disease: Long-term analysis of risk factors and outcome.
Blood
87:3625,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10.
Swerdlow AJ,
Douglas AJ,
Vaughan Hudson G,
Vaughn Hudson B,
MacLennan KA:
Risk of second primary cancer after Hodgkin's disease in patients in the British National Lymphoma Investigation: Relationships to host factors, histology and stage of Hodgkin's disease, and splenectomy.
Br J Cancer
68:1006,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Cohen JI:
Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease associated with acquired immunodeficiency (review).
Medicine
70:137,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Shapiro RS:
Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders in immunodeficiency: Meeting the challenge.
J Clin Oncol
8:371,
1990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Seiden MV,
Sklar J:
Molecular genetic analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (review).
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am
7:447,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Young L,
Alfieri C,
Hennessy K,
Evans H,
O'Hara C,
Anderson KC,
Ritz J,
Shapiro RS,
Rickinson A,
Kieff E,
Cohen JI:
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated genes in tissues of patients with EBV lymphoproliferative disease.
N Engl J Med
321:1080,
1989[Abstract]
15.
Schwartz RS,
Beldotti L:
Malignant lymphomas following allogeneic disease: Transition from an immunological to a neoplastic disorder.
Science
149:1511,
1965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16.
Deeg HJ,
Prentice R,
Fritz TE,
Sale GE,
Lombard LS,
Thomas ED,
Storb R:
Increased incidence of malignant tumors in dogs after total body irradiation and marrow transplantation.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
9:1505,
1983[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Broerse JJ,
Hollander CF,
Van Zwieten MJ:
Tumor induction in Rhesus monkeys after total body irradiation with X-rays and fission neutrons.
Int J Radiat Biol
40:671,
1981
18.
Kolb HJ,
Rieder I,
Bodenberger U,
Netzel B,
Schaffer E,
Kolb H,
Thierfelder S:
Dose rate and dose fractionation studies in total body irradiation of dogs.
Pathol Biol
27:370,
1979[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Shepherd JD,
Gascoyne RD,
Barnett MJ,
Coghlan JD,
Phillips GL:
Polyclonal Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorder following autografting for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bone Marrow Transplant
15:639,
1995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Okada S,
Nagayoshi K,
Nakauchi H,
Nishikawa S,
Miura Y,
Suda T:
Sequential analysis of hematopoietic reconstitution achieved by transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
81:1720,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21.
Socie G,
Kolb HJ,
Ljungman P:
Malignant diseases after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: The case for assessment of risk factors (review).
Br J Haematol
80:427,
1992[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22. (suppl 1)
Socie G,
Henry-Amar M,
Devergie A,
Esperou-Bourdeau H,
Ribaud P,
Traineau R,
Gluckman E:
Malignant diseases after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: An updated overview (review).
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol
36:S75,
1994
23. O'Reilly RJ, Lacerda JF, Lucas KG, Rosenfield NS, Small TN,
Papadopoulos EB: Adoptive cell therapy with donor lymphocytes for
EBV-associated lymphomas developing after allogeneic marrow transplants, in De Vita TD, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds): Important Advances in Oncology 1996. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott-Raven, 1996, p
149
24.
Witherspoon RP,
Deeg HJ,
Storb R:
Secondary malignancies after marrow transplantation for leukemia or aplastic anemia.
Transplantation
57:1413,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Leblond V,
Sutton L,
Dorent R,
Davi F,
Bitker MO,
Gabarre J,
Charlotte F,
Ghoussoub JJ,
Fourcade C,
Fischer A,
Gandjbakhch I,
Binet JL,
Raphael M:
Lymphoproliferative disorders after organ transplantation: A report of 24 cases observed in a single center.
J Clin Oncol
13:961,
1995[Abstract]
26.
List AF,
Greco FA,
Vogler LB:
Lymphoproliferative diseases in immunocompromised hosts: The role of Epstein-Barr virus (review).
J Clin Oncol
5:1673,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27.
Swinnen LJ:
Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder.
Leuk Lymphoma
6:289,
1992
28.
Morrison VA,
Dunn DL,
Manivel JC,
Gajl-Peczalska KJ,
Peterson BA:
Clinical characteristics of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders.
Am J Med
97:14,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Swinnen LJ,
Costanzo-Nordin MR,
Fisher SG,
O'Sullivan EJ,
Johnson MR,
Heroux AL,
Dizikes GJ,
Pifarre R,
Fisher RI:
Increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 in cardiac-transplant recipients.
N Engl J Med
323:1723,
1990[Abstract]
30.
Joncas JH,
Russo P,
Brochu P,
Simard P,
Brisebois J,
Dube J,
Marton D,
Leclerc JM,
Hume H,
Rivard GE:
Epstein-Barr virus polymorphic B-cell lymphoma associated with leukemia and with congenital immunodeficiencies.
J Clin Oncol
8:378,
1990[Abstract]
31.
Wilkinson AH,
Smith JL,
Hunsicker LG,
Tobacman J,
Kapelanski DP,
Johnson M,
Wright FH,
Behrendt DM,
Corry RJ:
Increased frequency of posttransplant lymphomas in patients treated with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone.
Transplantation
47:293,
1989[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Faure P,
d'Agay MF,
Tricot G,
Gluckman E,
Brocheriou C:
Immunoblastic lymphoma after bone marrow graft. Apropos of a case treated by |