|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Genetic and Immunological Properties of Phage-Displayed Human
Anti-Rh(D) Antibodies: Implications for Rh(D) Epitope Topology
Tylis Y. Chang and
Don L. Siegel
From the Blood Bank/Transfusion Medicine Section, Department of
Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Understanding anti-Rh(D) antibodies on a molecular level would
facilitate the genetic analysis of the human immune response to Rh(D),
lead to the design of therapeutically useful reagents that modulate
antibody binding, and provide relevant information regarding the
structural organization of Rh(D) epitopes. Previously, we described a
Fab/phage display-based method for producing a large array of
anti-Rh(D) antibodies from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of a single
alloimmunized donor. In the current study, we present a detailed
analysis of 83 randomly selected clones. Sequence analysis showed the
presence of 28 unique 1 heavy chain and 41 unique light
chain gene segments. These paired to produce 53 unique Fabs that had
specificity for at least half of the major Rh(D) epitopes.
Surprisingly, despite this diversity, only 4 closely related heavy
chain germline genes were used (VH3-30, VH3-30.3, VH3-33, and VH3-21).
Similarly, nearly all V light chains (15/18) were
derived from one germline gene (DPK9). light chains showed a more
diverse VL gene usage, but all (23/23) used the identical
J 2 gene. Several Fabs that differed in epitope specificity used identical heavy chains but different light chains. In
particular, 2 such clones differed by only 3 residues, which resulted
in a change from epD2 to epD3 specificity. These results suggest a
model in which footprints of anti-Rh(D) antibodies are essentially
identical to one another, and Rh(D) epitopes, as classically defined by
panels of Rh(D) variant cells, are not discrete entities. Furthermore,
these data imply that the epitope specificity of an anti-Rh(D) antibody
can change during the course of somatic mutation. From a clinical
perspective, this process, which we term epitope migration, has
significance for the design of agents that modulate antibody production
and for the creation of mimetics that block antibody binding in the
settings of transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the newborn.
Blood, Vol. 91 No. 8 (April 15), 1998:
pp. 3066-3078
© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Yamagami, S. Kacir, K. Ishii, A. S. Payne, D. L. Siegel, and J. R. Stanley
Antibodies to the Desmoglein 1 Precursor Proprotein but Not to the Mature Cell Surface Protein Cloned from Individuals without Pemphigus
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2009;
183(9):
5615 - 5621.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Anstee
Red cell genotyping and the future of pretransfusion testing
Blood,
July 9, 2009;
114(2):
248 - 256.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Roark, J. B. Bussel, D. B. Cines, and D. L. Siegel
Genetic analysis of autoantibodies in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura reveals evidence of clonal expansion and somatic mutation
Blood,
July 30, 2002;
100(4):
1388 - 1398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. N. van den Brink, W. S. Bril, E. A. M. Turenhout, M. Zuurveld, N. Bovenschen, M. Peters, T. T. Yee, K. Mertens, D. A. Lewis, T. L. Ortel, et al.
Two classes of germline genes both derived from the VH1 family direct the formation of human antibodies that recognize distinct antigenic sites in the C2 domain of factor VIII
Blood,
April 15, 2002;
99(8):
2828 - 2834.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. N. van den Brink, E. A. M. Turenhout, N. Bovenschen, B. G. A. D. H. Heijnen, K. Mertens, M. Peters, and J. Voorberg
Multiple VH genes are used to assemble human antibodies directed toward the A3-C1 domains of factor VIII
Blood,
February 15, 2001;
97(4):
966 - 972.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Y. Chang, D. L. Siegel;, N. D. Avent, W. Liu, J. W. Jones, M. L Scott, and D. Voak
The limitations of site-directed mutagenesis in the localization of Rh D epitopes
Blood,
August 1, 2000;
96(3):
1196 - 1199.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. F. Wagner, A. Frohmajer, B. Ladewig, N. I. Eicher, C. B. Lonicer, T. H. Muller, M. H. Siegel, and W. A. Flegel
Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes
Blood,
April 15, 2000;
95(8):
2699 - 2708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Avent and M. E. Reid
The Rh blood group system: a review
Blood,
January 15, 2000;
95(2):
375 - 387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Liu, N. D. Avent, J. W. Jones, M. L. Scott, and D. Voak
Molecular Configuration of Rh D Epitopes as Defined by Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Expression of Mutant Rh Constructs in K562 Erythroleukemia Cells
Blood,
December 15, 1999;
94(12):
3986 - 3996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.B. Hemker, P.C. Ligthart, L. Berger, D.J. van Rhenen, C.E. van der Schoot, and P.A. M.-v. Wijk
DAR, a New RhD Variant Involving Exons 4, 5, and 7, Often in Linkage With ceAR, a New Rhce Variant Frequently Found in African Blacks
Blood,
December 15, 1999;
94(12):
4337 - 4342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zhu, S. Haller, H. Li, A. Chaudhuri, A. Blancher, and K. Suyama
Use of RhD Fusion Protein Expressed on K562 Cell Surface in the Study of Molecular Basis for D Antigenic Epitopes
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 26, 1999;
274(9):
5731 - 5737.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|