|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, 1 May 2002, Vol. 99, No. 9, pp. 3163-3168
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
Maintenance therapy with alternate-day prednisone improves
survival in multiple myeloma patients
James R. Berenson,
John J. Crowley,
Thomas M. Grogan,
Jeffrey Zangmeister,
Adrienne D. Briggs,
Glenn M. Mills,
Bart Barlogie, and
Sydney E. Salmon
From Cedars Sinai Medical Center and the Jonsson
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles,
School of Medicine; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center,
Seattle, WA; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson; Columbus
Community Clinical Oncology Program, OH; Louisiana State University,
Shreveport; and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock.
The role of maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma is
controversial. Recent studies have shown an improvement in both
progression-free and overall survival for patients receiving
maintenance treatment with a combination of interferon and
glucocorticoids, compared with interferon alone. The role of
glucocorticoids alone as maintenance therapy has not been
previously addressed. We compared alternate-day, oral prednisone at 2 different dose levels (10 mg versus 50 mg) for remission maintenance
among previously untreated myeloma patients following a response to
induction with standard-dose vincristine, doxorubicin, and
dexamethasone with prednisone (VAD-P) or VAD-P plus quinine (VAD-P/Q).
There were 250 eligible patients registered on Southwest
Oncology Group study 9210 and randomized to receive VAD-P or
VAD-P/Q. There were 125 patients achieving at least a 25% tumor
reduction following induction therapy who were randomized to either
physiologic (10 mg) or pharmacologic (50 mg) doses of alternate-day,
oral prednisone until disease progression. At the time of study entry,
patient characteristics were similar in VAD-P and VAD-P/Q patients and
in the 2 arms randomized to maintenance therapy. After a median
follow-up of 53 months, there was no difference in either
progression-free or overall survival between the 2 induction regimens.
However, from the time of maintenance randomization, both
progression-free (14 versus 5 months; P = .003) and
overall survival (37 versus 26 months; P = .05) were
significantly improved in patients receiving 50 mg as compared with 10 mg alternate-day prednisone. There was no difference in
treatment-related adverse events between the groups. Thus, 50 mg, oral,
alternate-day prednisone is effective maintenance treatment for
multiple myeloma patients who achieve a response to induction chemotherapy.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Spencer, H. M. Prince, A. W. Roberts, I. W. Prosser, K. F. Bradstock, L. Coyle, D. S. Gill, N. Horvath, J. Reynolds, and N. Kennedy
Consolidation Therapy With Low-Dose Thalidomide and Prednisolone Prolongs the Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing a Single Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Procedure
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2009;
27(11):
1788 - 1793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Katzel, P. Hari, and D. H. Vesole
Multiple Myeloma: Charging Toward a Bright Future
CA Cancer J Clin,
September 1, 2007;
57(5):
301 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fonseca and A. K. Stewart
Targeted therapeutics for multiple myeloma: The arrival of a risk-stratified approach
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
March 1, 2007;
6(3):
802 - 810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dispenzieri, S. V. Rajkumar, M. A. Gertz, M. Q. Lacy, R. A. Kyle, P. R. Greipp, T. E. Witzig, J. A. Lust, S. J. Russell, S. R. Hayman, et al.
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART): Consensus Statement
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
March 1, 2007;
82(3):
323 - 341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Attal, P. Moreau, H. Avet-Loiseau, and J.-L. Harousseau
Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
Hematology,
January 1, 2007;
2007(1):
311 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Richardson, T. Hideshima, and K. C. Anderson
Plasma cell dyscrasias
ASH Self-Assessment Program,
January 1, 2007;
2007(1):
298 - 327.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Suvannasankha, C. Fausel, B. E. Juliar, C. T. Yiannoutsos, W. B. Fisher, R. H. Ansari, L. L. Wood, G. G. Smith, L. D. Cripe, and R. Abonour
Final Report of Toxicity and Efficacy of a Phase II Study of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Prednisone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Hoosier Oncology Group Trial, HEM01-21
Oncologist,
January 1, 2007;
12(1):
99 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Attal, J.-L. Harousseau, S. Leyvraz, C. Doyen, C. Hulin, L. Benboubker, I. Y. Agha, J.-H. Bourhis, L. Garderet, B. Pegourie, et al.
Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma
Blood,
November 15, 2006;
108(10):
3289 - 3294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Z. Orlowski
Initial Therapy of Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation
Hematology,
January 1, 2006;
2006(1):
338 - 347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. V. Rajkumar and R. A. Kyle
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
October 1, 2005;
80(10):
1371 - 1382.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gardyn
Thalidomide With Continuous Low-Dose Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 20, 2005;
23(6):
1323 - 1323.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Stewart, C. I. Chen, K. Howson-Jan, D. White, J. Roy, M. J. Kovacs, C. Shustik, A. Sadura, L. Shepherd, K. Ding, et al.
Results of a Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial of Thalidomide and Prednisone Maintenance Therapy for Multiple Myeloma after Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2004;
10(24):
8170 - 8176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Kyle and S. V. Rajkumar
Multiple Myeloma
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 28, 2004;
351(18):
1860 - 1873.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G.M. Durie, J. Jacobson, B. Barlogie, and J. Crowley
Magnitude of Response With Myeloma Frontline Therapy Does Not Predict Outcome: Importance of Time to Progression in Southwest Oncology Group Chemotherapy Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
1857 - 1863.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Barlogie, J. Shaughnessy, G. Tricot, J. Jacobson, M. Zangari, E. Anaissie, R. Walker, and J. Crowley
Treatment of multiple myeloma
Blood,
January 1, 2004;
103(1):
20 - 32.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L Stanford and S. D Zondor
Bortezomib Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Ann. Pharmacother.,
December 1, 2003;
37(12):
1825 - 1830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Unger, M. LeBlanc, J. J. Crowley, H. B. Grossman, R. B. Natale, A. J. Wozniak, J. R. Berenson, A. F. List, W. A. Peters III, R. C. Flanigan, et al.
Estimating the Impact of New Clinical Trial Proven Cancer Therapy and Cancer Chemoprevention on Population Mortality: The Karnofsky Memorial Lecture
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2003;
21(90230):
246s - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. H. Yang, M. H. Ma, R. A. Vescio, and J. R. Berenson
Overcoming Drug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma: The Emergence of Therapeutic Approaches to Induce Apoptosis
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 15, 2003;
21(22):
4239 - 4247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Kyle, M. A. Gertz, T. E. Witzig, J. A. Lust, M. Q. Lacy, A. Dispenzieri, R. Fonseca, S. V. Rajkumar, J. R. Offord, D. R. Larson, et al.
Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
January 1, 2003;
78(1):
21 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. V. Rajkumar, M. A. Gertz, R. A. Kyle, P. R. Greipp, and Mayo Clinic Myeloma, Amyloid, and Dysproteinemia G
Current Therapy for Multiple Myeloma
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
August 1, 2002;
77(8):
813 - 822.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|