Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 November 2007, Vol. 110, No. 10, pp. 3507-3516.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 20, 2007; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097238.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2007-06-097238v1
110/10/3507    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seam, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cheson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seam, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cheson, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Next Article next article arrow

Submitted June 29, 2007
Accepted July 25, 2007

The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma

Pamela Seam, Malik E. Juweid, and Bruce D. Cheson*

Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States

* Corresponding author; email: bdc4{at}georgetown.edu.

18-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a non-invasive, 3-dimensional imaging modality that has become widely used in the management of patients with malignant lymphomas. This technology has been demonstrated to be more sensitive and specific than either 67gallium scintigraphy or computerized tomography, providing a more accurate distinction between scar or fibrosis and active tumor. PET scans have been evaluated in pretreatment staging, restaging, monitoring during therapy, post-therapy surveillance, assessment of transformation and, more recently, as a surrogate marker in new drug development. Data to support these various roles requires prospective validation. Moreover, caution must be exercised in the interpretation of PET scans because of technical limitations, variability of FDG-avidity among the different lymphoma histologic subtypes, and in the large number of etiologies of false-negative and false-positive results. Recent attempts to standardize PET in clinical trials, and incorporation of this technology into uniformly adopted response criteria will hopefully lead to improved outcome for patients with lymphoma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Terasawa, J. Lau, S. Bardet, O. Couturier, T. Hotta, M. Hutchings, T. Nihashi, and H. Nagai
Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Interim Response Assessment of Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1906 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Cheson
The Case Against Heavy PETing
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1742 - 1743.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. K. Buck, M. Bommer, M. E. Juweid, G. Glatting, S. Stilgenbauer, F. M. Mottaghy, M. Schulz, T. Kull, D. Bunjes, P. Moller, et al.
First Demonstration of Leukemia Imaging with the Proliferation Marker 18F-Fluorodeoxythymidine
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1756 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. L. Elstrom, J. P. Leonard, M. Coleman, and R. K. J. Brown
Combined PET and low-dose, noncontrast CT scanning obviates the need for additional diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients undergoing staging or restaging for lymphoma
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2008; 19(10): 1770 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
C. Bodet-Milin, F. Kraeber-Bodere, P. Moreau, L. Campion, B. Dupas, and S. Le Gouill
Investigation of FDG-PET/CT imaging to guide biopsies in the detection of histological transformation of indolent lymphoma
Haematologica, March 1, 2008; 93(3): 471 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. E. Juweid
18F-FDG PET as a Routine Test for Posttherapy Assessment of Hodgkin's Disease and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Where Is the Evidence?
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 9 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020