|
|
Blood, 1 January 2008, Vol. 111, No. 1, pp. 25-41.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on October 23, 2007October 22, 2007; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-08-109488.
Previous Article | Next Article 
Submitted August 27, 2007
Accepted September 21, 2007
American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the use of epoetin and darbepoetin
J Douglas Rizzo*, Mark R Somerfield, Karen L. Hagerty, Jerome Seidenfeld, Julia Bohlius, Charles L Bennett, David F Cella, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Matthew J Goode, Ann A Jakubowski, Mark U Rarick, David H Regan, and Alan E Lichtin
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, United States
BlueCross and BlueShield Association, Chicago, IL, United States
University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
Patient Representative, Mesa, AZ, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
NW Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, United States
US Oncology, Portland, OR, United States
Cleveland Clinical Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
* Corresponding author; email: rizzo{at}mcw.edu.
Purpose: To update the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASH/ACSO) recommendations for the use of epoetin. The guideline was expanded to address use of darbepoetin and thromboembolic risk associated with these agents. Method: An Update Committee ("Committee") reviewed and analyzed data published since 2002 through July 2007. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases were searched. Recommendations: For patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia, the Committee continues to recommend initiating an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) as hemoglobin (Hb)approaches, or falls below, 10 g/dL, to increase Hb and decrease transfusions. ESA treatment continues to be recommended for patients with low-risk myelodysplasia for similar reasons. There is no evidence showing increased survival as a result of ESA treatment. Conclusive evidence is lacking that, absent clinical circumstances necessitating earlier treatment, initiating ESAs at Hb levels greater than 10 g/dL either spares more patients from transfusion or substantially improves their quality of life. Starting doses and dose modifications based on response or lack thereof should follow the package insert. Continuing ESAs beyond 6 to 8 weeks in the absence of response, assuming appropriate dose increase has been attempted in nonresponders as per US Food and Drug Administration-approved label, does not seem to be beneficial, and ESA therapy should be discontinued. The Committee recommends monitoring iron stores and supplementing iron intake for ESA-treated patients. ESAs should be used cautiously with chemotherapy, or in clinical states, associated with elevated risk for thromoembolic complications. The Committee also cautions against ESA use for patients with cancer who are not receiving chemotherapy, since recent trials report increased thromboembolic risks and decreased survival under these circumstances.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri
Unraveling the Mystery of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Cancer Promotion
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2008;
68(11):
4013 - 4017.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri
Role of Erythropoietin-stimulating Agents in the Outcomes of Patients with Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
140 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
| |