|
|
Blood, 1 September 2008, Vol. 112, No. 5, pp. 1638-1645.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 18, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-11-124602.
Previous Article | Next Article 
Submitted November 19, 2007
Accepted May 8, 2008
A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as frontline therapy for patients age 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
Stefan Faderl*, Farhad Ravandi, Xuelin Huang, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Zeev Estrov, Gautam Borthakur, Srdan Verstovsek, Deborah A Thomas, Monica Kwari, and Hagop M Kantarjian
Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
* Corresponding author; email: sfaderl{at}mdanderson.org.
Clofarabine is a novel nucleoside analog with activity in adult AML. We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination; and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have therefore conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower dose clofarabine +/- low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML 60 years. Patients received clofarabine 30 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days +/- cytarabine 20 mg/m2 subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation courses comprised 3 days of clofarabine +/- 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range 60 to 83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% versus 31%, p= 0.025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (p=0.276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months versus 1.7 months, p=.04), but not overall survival (11.4 months versus 5.8 months, p=.1). Clofarabine plus low dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with a comparable toxicity profile.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bauer, N. Skoetz, C. Brillant, C. Herbst, I. Monsef, S. Kluge, and A. Engert
Tenth Biannual Report of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group--Focus on Acute Myeloid Leukemia
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 21, 2009;
101(20):
E1 - E1.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Klepin and L. Balducci
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in Older Adults
Oncologist,
March 1, 2009;
14(3):
222 - 232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Shah and J. E. Lancet
Frontline Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are We Making Progress?
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
372 - 377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|