|
|
Blood, 5 February 2009, Vol. 113, No. 6, pp. 1375-1382.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on November 6, 2008November 14, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168625.
Previous Article | Next Article 
Submitted July 17, 2008
Accepted October 24, 2008
Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison
Jan J. Cornelissen*, Bronno van der Holt, Gregor E.G. Verhoef, Mars B. van 't Veer, Marinus H.J. van Oers, Harry C. Schouten, Gert Ossenkoppele, Pieter Sonneveld, Johan Maertens, Marinus van Marwijk Kooy, Martijn R. Schaafsma, Pierre W. Wijermans, Douwe H. Biesma, Shulamit Wittebol, Paul J. Voogt, Joke W. Baars, Pierre Zachee, Leo F Verdonck, Bob Lowenberg, and Adriaan W. Dekker
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Isala Clinics-Sophia, Zwolle, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Haga Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands
Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Meander MC, Amersfoort, Netherlands
Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerpen, Belgium
University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
* Corresponding author; email: j.cornelissen{at}erasmusmc.nl.
While commonly accepted in poor-risk ALL, the role of alloSCT is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in CR1, according a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. 433 eligible patients were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an alloSCT. AlloSCT was performed in 91 out of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24% and 55% for patients with versus those without a donor (HR: 0.37 (0.23-0.60), P<0.001). Non-relapse mortality estimated 16% (+/- 4) at 5 years following alloSCT. As a result, DFS at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60% versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60 (0.41-0.89), P= 0.01). Following risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (p=0.05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favourable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest non-relapse mortality. This trial is registered with www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|
|